The following posts provide a snapshot of selected UK, EU and global financial regulatory developments of interest to banks, investment firms, broker-dealers, market infrastructures, asset managers and corporates.
-
UK 2025 Regulatory Initiatives Grid published
14 April 2025
The Financial Services Regulatory Initiatives Forum (the Forum) has published the Regulatory Initiatives Forum Grid (the Grid), with the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) also updating its webpage. The previous Grid was due to be published in May 2024 but was postponed due to the General Election, meaning the Forum published only an interim update in October 2024.
The 2025 Grid sets out the regulatory pipeline for the next 24 months and reflects the reprioritisation that has taken place since the new government came into power. Notable initiatives include:- motor finance commission review: the FCA intends to confirm, within six weeks of the Supreme Court's decision on past use of discretionary commission arrangements by motor finance firms, whether it will propose a redress scheme;
- liquidity risk management in funds: the FCA will consult on refined proposals regarding liquidity risk management in funds to implement FSB and IOSCO guidelines;
- Consumer Composite Investments (CCI) Regulation: the FCA published a second consultation paper on the new CCI regime on 16 April (see our update) and plans to issue a Policy Statement with final rules in late 2025;
Topics : Client Asset Protection, Conduct and Culture, Consumer / Retail, Financial Crime and Sanctions, Financial Market Infrastructure, FinTech, Fund Regulation, MiFID II, Operational Resilience, Other Developments, Payment Services and Payment Systems, Prudential Regulation, Recovery and Resolution, Securities -
UK PRA business plan 2025/26
10 April 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published its Business Plan 2025/26 which sets out the workplan for and regulatory initiatives to advance its strategic priorities. This year's business plan is said to reflect the evolution of the PRA's priorities, and in particular the work it is doing to deliver its new secondary objective on competitiveness and growth. Specific initiatives include:- Implementing the Basel 3.1 standards, where the PRA intends to publish its final rules, once Parliament has revoked the relevant parts of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
- Finalising and implementing the strong and simple framework for small domestic deposit takers. During 2025/26, the PRA will finalise the simplified capital regime and the additional liquidity simplifications. It intends to publish a policy statement on these in Q4.
Read more. -
PRA Dear CFO letter: prudential expectations on significant risk transfer financing
9 April 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a Dear CFO letter outlining its prudential expectations regarding practices related to illiquid and structured financing portfolios. The PRA focuses on significant risk transfer (SRT) financing activities, but holds a wider expectation that firms should consider its expectations for all relevant financing portfolios. The PRA emphasises the expectation that firms analyse the characteristics of different collateral types when determining the appropriate regulatory capital treatment. The PRA is concerned that not all firms conduct sufficiently through assessments of collateral eligibility and that some firms have adopted imprudent approaches to the recognition of collateral for regulatory capital purposes, leading to an undercapitalisation of risks. The PRA highlights that its expectations align with the near-final rule changes for implementation of the Basel 3.1 Standards.
The PRA expects firms to consider the concerns identified in the letter and ensure, where needed, that policies, control frameworks and reporting are enhanced to address them. Supervisors will be requesting relevant firms to provide a response to the letter by 11 June.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EBA 2024 reports: Market and credit risk benchmarking exercises
4 April 2025
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published its 2024 Reports on the annual market and credit risk benchmarking exercises. Both reports are mandated by Article 78 of the Capital Requirements Directive to assist competent authorities at monitoring the consistency of risk weighted assets (RWAs) across all EU institutions authorised to use internal approaches for the calculation of capital requirements. Regarding market risk, the report summarises the conclusions drawn from a hypothetical portfolio exercise conducted in 2023/24, performed on a sample of 43 European banks from 13 jurisdictions. The results confirm that most participating banks in the exercise have seen a relatively low dispersion in the initial market valuation, though slightly higher compared to 2023. However, there was a decrease in the dispersion of risk measures submissions compared to the previous exercise, as well as variability in general through most exercises, owing to better data submissions by participating banks because of improved instructions, knowledge of the portfolio and the resolution of issues encountered in the previous exercise. The EBA has also released, for the first time, a specific report on the fundamental review of the trading book Alternative Standardised Approach (ASA). This report expands the findings of the market risk report. In the future, benchmarking exercises will be extended to banks that apply the ASA methodology independently of the current requirement to obtain approval to adopt internal models for market risk own funds requirements. For credit risk, the results confirmed that the variability of RWAs remained stable compared to the previous year, but for some asset classes and parameters, a reduction could be observed in the longer run.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK BoE consults on FSCS depositor protection and new resolution tool
31 March 2025
The UK Bank of England (BoE) has published its consultation paper CP4/25 which contains proposals for depositor protection and the new resolution tool proposed by the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill. The consultation paper was published alongside relevant appendices and a press release.
The first part of the consultation proposes increasing the FSCS deposit protection limit from £85,000 to £110,000, and increasing the limit applicable to temporary high balance claims from GBP1 million to GBP1.4 million. The increases take into account the effect of consumer price inflation since the limit was last updated in 2017, with the UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) revising the figure to a round number for memorability, with the aim of increasing depositor awareness and confidence in the deposit protection framework. The consultation also proposes changes to the PRA's supervisory expectation, reinstating that firms should ensure their systems are able to accommodate limit changes at short notice.
Read more. -
EC adopts proposal to amend CRR in relation to SFT stable funding factors
31 March 2025
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a proposal to amend Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) in relation to the stable funding factors for securities financing transactions (SFTs) and unsecured transactions with a residual maturity of less than six months. The factors are used to apply the net stable funding requirements (NSFR) under the CRR, and, by virtue of article 510(8) of CRR, were due to be increased unless otherwise specified in a legislative act adopted on the basis of an EC proposal. The original intention of article 510(8) was to increase the factors in line with the international standards agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, but allowing for credit institutions to adapt in time, and calibrate appropriately, for the increase, which would have occurred by 28 June. However, the current position is instead being maintained in order to ensure the ongoing efficient functioning of SFT and collateral markets, and avoid an undue increase in funding costs for credit institutions. The decision to maintain the current position also intends to bolster the EU's competitive position given the decisions made by other jurisdictions (including the UK and the U.S.) to deviate from the Basel III international standards. The EC has also published, alongside the proposal document, a staff working document providing background, and a press release giving an overview of the proposal and its context.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK FPC consults on increase to O-SII buffer thresholds
28 March 2025
The UK Financial Policy Committee (FPC) has published its consultation paper on increasing the current capital buffer thresholds which apply to other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs). The thresholds are part of the FPC's framework for the systemic risk buffer, which requires systemically important banks to hold more capital to absorb stress, and increase the resilience of the UK financial system as a whole. The consultation follows the FPC's review in 2024 which noted the growth in nominal GDP between 2019 and 2023, and that current capital buffer thresholds would need to change to reflect this cumulative growth. Accordingly, the FPC is proposing to increase the current O-SII buffer thresholds by 20% (rounded to the nearest GBP5 million), based on the 20% cumulative growth in nominal GDP between 2019 and 2023. If the FPC confirms these proposals, the UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), which is responsible for issuing O-SII buffer rates, will reissue 2024 O-SII buffer rates based on firms' 2023 leverage exposure measures which will apply from 1 January 2026. The FPC also proposes to assess the thresholds as part of its regular reviews of the framework which take place at least every three years, to avoid significant one-off increases in future. Going forward, it is proposed that future indexation will be communicated through the FPC Record which will then be used by the PRA for setting the new rate. The deadline for comments is 30 May.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England 2025 bank capital stress test launched
24 March 2025
The Bank of England (BoE) has launched the 2025 bank capital stress test for the seven largest and most systemic UK banks and building societies. The exercise is the successor to the Annual Cyclical Scenario. The test involves a hypothetical stress scenario which will be used to assess the resilience of the UK banking system to deep simultaneous recessions in the UK and global economies, large falls in asset prices, higher global interest rates and a stressed level of misconduct costs. The stress scenario is not a forecast of macroeconomic and financial conditions. Rather, like previous concurrent stress test scenarios, it is intended to be a coherent "tail risk" scenario designed to be severe and broad enough to allow the Financial Policy Committee and Prudential Regulation Committee to assess the resilience of UK banks to a range of adverse shocks. The 2025 Bank Capital Stress Test has three elements, which include a macroeconomic scenario, a financial markets and traded risk scenario and a misconduct stress. The macroeconomic scenario involves a severe global aggregate supply shock leading to deep recessions in the UK and globally. The BoE also published key elements of the stress test. The results will be published at an aggregate and individual bank level in Q4. The results will be used to inform the setting of capital buffers for the UK banking system and individual participating banks, and to inform a broader understanding of risks in the banking system.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission targeted consultation on the application of the markets risk prudential framework
24 March 2025
The European Commission (EC) has launched a consultation to help determine the best approach for the application of the EU's framework on market risk prudential requirements for banks, with an accompanying press release. Last year, the Commission postponed by one year (until 1 January 2026) the date of fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB) application in the EU, in order to align implementation with other major global jurisdictions. Recent international developments indicate further possible delays in these jurisdictions, raising concerns on the international level playing field and the impact on EU banks. In this context, the EC is consulting on possible action within its mandate under Article 461a of the capital requirements regulation around three potential options: (i) implementing the FRTB as currently laid down in the Banking package, from 1 January 2026; (ii) postponing the date of application by a further year (1 January 2027); or (iii) introducing temporary and targeted amendments to the market risk framework for up to three years. A list of possible temporary amendments is set out in the annex to the consultation. Combinations of the options or other alternatives could also be envisaged provided they are within the EC's mandate. Interested parties are invited to submit their contributions by 22 April. The EC is empowered under Article 461a to adopt a Delegated Regulation by the end of June.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK PRA consultation on recognised exchange policy and transfer of main indices
19 March 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has launched a consultation on the proposed conditions an investment exchange must meet to be a 'recognised exchange' for the purposes of Article 4(1)(72)(c) of the UK's Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The PRA proposes to introduce a new Recognised Exchanges (RE) Part to specify the conditions which focus on two areas: (i) exchange and market structure risk; and (ii) asset liquidity risk.
The PRA proposes that firms should undertake the exchange and asset liquidity risk assessment themselves but to mitigate the risk that firms adopt inconsistent approaches, the PRA proposes to evaluate the implemented approaches through post implementation thematic reviews. Consequential amendments are proposed to the definition of higher risk equity exposure in the PRA's near-final rules implementing Basel 3.1, tying into the criteria for equity risk weight exposures the exchange and market structure risk but not the asset liquidity risk conditions. The PRA also proposes to restate the list of 'main indices' (those securities that are traded on a stock exchange, which are treated as eligible for recognition as Credit Risk Mitigation) in the Glossary Part of the PRA Rulebook without any policy changes. The list is currently in Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/1646. The deadline for comments on the consultation is 18 June.
Read more. -
EBA final report on amendments to ITS on internal model authorisations under CRR
17 March 2025
The European Banking Authority has published its final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) amending the existing implementing regulation on the joint decision process for internal model authorisation under Articles 143(1), 151(9), 283 and 325az of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). This final draft amending ITS is part of the first phase of the EBA roadmap for implementing the EU Banking Package. The key amendments include:- A revised scope for the use of internal models for regulatory purposes under CRR III, where the possibility of applying these models for operational risk has been removed. As a result, references to the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) have been deleted from the scope of the revised ITS.
- Updated references to the ITS and regulatory technical standards (RTS) on the functioning of supervisory colleges, reflecting changes in the revised supervisory colleges regulatory framework.
The draft ITS will be submitted to the Commission for endorsement following which the ITS will be subject to scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council before being published in the Official Journal of the EU.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
BCBS provides an update on upcoming workstreams
13 March 2025
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has published a press release providing an update on its workstreams. The BCBS states that it will publish by mid-2025 an update on the outcome of its work to prepare a suite of practical tools to support supervisors in their day-to-day work, taking into account the lessons learned from the 2023 banking turmoil. The BCBS has also committed to analysing recent developments and global practices on banks' information and communication technology risk management. The Committee plans to publish a range of practices report covering its findings in 2026. As part of the BCBS's work relating to non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs), the BCBS states that it will conduct a comprehensive investigation into the synthetic risk transfers from banks to NBFIs to provide an enhanced understanding of the risks and benefits of these products and the evolving nature of the transaction structures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU amending technical standards published for specifying the data collection for the 2025 benchmarking exercise
12 March 2025
The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/379 has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The EU Capital Requirements Directive requires competent authorities to conduct an annual assessment of the quality of internal approaches used for the calculation of own funds requirements. To assist competent authorities in this assessment, the European Banking Authority calculates and distributes benchmark values to competent authorities that allows a comparison of individual institutions' risk parameters. These benchmark values are based on data submitted by institutions as laid out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 which specifies the benchmarking portfolios, templates, and definitions to be used as part of the annual benchmarking exercises. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/379 amends the implementing technical standards set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070, replacing the existing annexes IV, V, VI, VII, and X. It will enter into force on 1 April.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK PRA consults on increasing threshold for leverage ratio framework
5 March 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has opened a consultation on raising the retail deposits leverage ratio threshold from £50 billion to £70 billion. The leverage ratio applies to major UK banks, building societies and investment firms and to those firms with significant non-UK assets. The PRA sets thresholds to determine which firms are subject to the leverage ratio. The thresholds are £50 billion in retail deposits for major UK firms and £10 billion for non-UK assets for firms with significant non-UK assets. The PRA is proposing to increase the threshold for major UK firms, which was first implemented in 2016, to £70 billion to maintain the proportionality of the framework, ensure it reflects the risk appetite and does not lead to inadvertent regulatory tightening. The threshold for significant non-UK assets will remain the same as the PRA considers that it is still appropriate. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until 5 June. The PRA proposes that the implementation date for these changes would be 1 January 2026.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
FCA speech on approach to NBFI leverage
26 February 2025
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published a speech by Sarah Pritchard, executive director of consumers, competition and international, on the FCA's approach to non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) leverage. The FCA believes that the first line of defence against the build-up of systemic risk related to leverage use is NBFIs themselves appropriately managing their own investment risk. However, for NBFIs to effectively manage their risks related to leverage use, they need to have access to adequate data and information about the markets in which they operate and the risks to which they're exposed. The second line of defence is counterparty credit risk management. However, in recent stress episodes, counterparty credit risk management has often failed to prevent systemic risks from crystallising. Enhancing private disclosure between counterparties would give leverage providers more information about the overall risk exposures of their NBFI clients, allowing them to manage their counterparty risk more effectively. That said, if NBFIs are required to disclose too much information, this could reveal proprietary information about their investment strategies. The FCA consider that industry has an important role to play in establishing best practice and in developing solutions that can balance the interests of leverage users and providers to improve data availability, so that NBFIs and counterparty credit providers can continue to operate as the first and second lines of defence.
Read more. -
EBA consultation on amending data collection for 2026 benchmarking under CRD IV
25 February 2025
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published a consultation paper containing draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 with regard to the benchmarking of internal models in advance of the 2026 benchmarking exercise. Article 78 of Directive 2013/36 (CRD VI) requires competent authorities to conduct an annual assessment of the quality of approaches used for the calculation of own funds requirements. To assist competent authorities in this assessment, the EBA calculates and distributes benchmark values to competent authorities that allows a comparison of individual institutions' risk parameters. These benchmark values are based on data submitted by institutions as laid out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 which specifies the benchmarking portfolios, templates and definitions to be used as part of the annual benchmarking exercises.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
FSB letter to G20 finance ministers and central bank governors ahead of meeting
24 February 2025
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published a letter (dated 21 February) to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors ahead of their meeting on 26 and 27 February. The letter addresses areas of focus for the FSB, including:- Implementation monitoring, providing a strategic review of the FSB's monitoring of 15 years of implementation of reforms. The review is intended to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the monitoring of post-global financial crisis regulatory reforms and identify areas where improvements can be made in the tools used to ensure consistent, global implementation of agreed reforms. The FSB will publish a progress report in October.
- Completing the G20 roadmap to enhance cross-border payments. The FSB note that as the work has advanced, many structural issues have become apparent that require concerted efforts to resolve. Addressing these issues calls for significant additional work up to and beyond 2027. The FSB will report in October on progress towards the G20's goal of making cross-border payments faster, cheaper, more transparent, and accessible. The FSB's focus this year is on improving the end-user experience, coordinating closely the work of the Bank for International Settlements Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and other partner organisations.
Read more. -
EBA report on data availability and feasibility of a common methodology for ESG exposures
24 February 2025
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published a report on the data availability and feasibility of a common methodology for ESG exposures. In accordance with the mandate under Article 501c(1) of Regulation 575/2013 (CRR), this report aims to assess the availability and accessibility of data related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, as well as the feasibility of introducing a standardised methodology for identifying and qualifying banking book credit exposures to ESG risks.
The EBA explores institutions' existing practices and identifies the current challenges in standardising the identification and classification of exposures to ESG risks, building on observations related to data quality and collection, assessment methodologies and available regulatory guidance. The overview of current practices is complemented by an analysis of specific elements covered by the mandate, including sustainability disclosure reporting frameworks, supervisory stress testing and ESG scores in the credit risk ratings of external credit assessment institutions.
Read more. -
UK PRA approach to policy updated
20 February 2025
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published its updated approach to policy under the regulatory framework as set out in UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The approach document has been amended following the consultation (CP27/23) and is published with the PRA's policy statement which provides feedback to the consultation responses. The CP had, in particular, asked for feedback on the PRA's secondary competitiveness and growth objective, the implementation of international standards, and stakeholder engagement, in the context of the PRA's enhanced objective and accountability requirements introduced by FSMA 2023.
With regard to the secondary competitiveness and growth objective, the PRA reiterates a number of the points raised by the Independent Evaluation Office during its evaluation of the PRA's approach to its new objective, including the PRA's clarification that the most appropriate way to advance the secondary competitiveness and growth objective is to take forward a wide range of initiatives across its general functions, rather than via a single flagship initiative.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK FCA update on personal investment firms and capital deduction for redress
14 February 2025
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has updated its webpage on its consultation paper CP23/24: capital deduction for redress: personal investment firms. The consultation was issued in response to the FCA identifying significant redress liabilities falling to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, in order to strengthen prudential requirements so that personal investment firms have to hold more capital for redress. The consultation is now closed, and the FCA has updated its webpage to confirm that it is considering feedback. However, the updated webpage also confirms that the FCA is looking across at feedback linked to other proposals including the call for input on modernising the redress framework, and its review of regulatory requirements following the introduction of the Consumer Duty. The FCA also confirms that it will continue to carry out increased monitoring of firms as part of its authorisation process, and highlights the update it published in January which sets out FCA expectations on redress liabilities, and what firms should and should not do to tackle polluting behaviour and meet their redress liabilities.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority policy statement on simplifying firm-specific capital communications
12 February 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published a policy statement (PS2/25) on streamlining firm-specific capital communications which simplifies the content and process of the firm-specific capital communications used to set Pillar 2A, the systemic buffers and the additional leverage ratio buffer (ALRB). These changes have no impact on firms' capital requirements. The PRA also provides feedback to responses received to Chapter 3: Streamlining firm-specific capital communications of its September 2024 consultation on streamlining the Pillar 2A framework (CP9/24). In response to the feedback, the PRA has made one small change to paragraph 5.18 of supervisory statement SS31/15 on the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP). This change has no meaningful effect on the policy. The new policy and rules will take effect on 31 March. This is consistent with the consultation, and firms are not required to take any specific actions to implement the changes.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority draft ITS to support Pillar 3 Data Hub
12 February 2025
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published its final report on draft ITS on IT solutions for public disclosures by institutions, other than small and non-complex ones, relating to Pillar 3 disclosures under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank clarifications on ICAAP and ILAAP requirements
10 February 2025
The European Central Bank (ECB) has published a report clarifying the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP), as well as the respective package submissions. The ECB reminds banks of its main supervisory expectations on sound and effective capital and liquidity management in line with the ECB Guides on ICAAP and ILAAP published in November 2018. The ECB also outlines some clarifications on the governance around the submissions and key content areas which should be reflected in ICAAP and ILAAP packages. The report notes that it remains banks' responsibility to determine and apply the most appropriate approach to ensure sound capital and liquidity adequacy assessment processes tailored to their own specificities. Therefore, the ECB's clarifications focus on sound practices instead of setting additional expectations or requirements. They should be considered by banks to refine or improve their capital and liquidity management practices. Regarding the technical details around ICAAP and ILAAP package submissions, the note "Technical implementation of the EBA Guidelines on ICAAP information collected for SREP purposes" that was sent to banks in February 2017 remains applicable and is included in the annex to the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission call for evidence on amending net stable funding ratio treatment of securities financing transactions under CRR
10 February 2025
The European Commission (EC) has published a call for evidence on targeted amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) to adjust the prudential treatment of securities financing transactions (SFTs) under the net stable funding ratio (NSFR).
Under Article 510(8) of the CRR, until 28 June 2025, EU credit institutions can apply lower required stable funding (RSF) factors for SFTs and unsecured transactions with a residual maturity of less than six months than those set out under the Basel standards. Under Article 510(7) of the CRR, the EC has the power to adopt a legislative proposal to amend provisions in the CRR on the treatment of these instruments under the NSFR. The targeted amendments therefore aim to make permanent the current transitory prudential treatment for SFTs and unsecured transactions with a residual maturity of less than six months, with financial customers, for the purpose of the NSFR (i.e. to extend the current treatment also beyond 28 June 2025, and permanently). The EC is proposing to make this treatment permanent on the basis that the higher RSF factors that would otherwise apply would make these instruments more costly in the EU and would consequently harm the demand for collateral and the liquidity in the collateral markets. The EC is also responding to concerns that the decisions of the U.S. and the UK to maintain lower RSF factors than under the Basel standards for these instruments on a permanent basis may lead to a loss of competitiveness for EU banks. The deadline for responses to the call for evidence is 10 March 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority reports on implementation of first phase of banking book heatmap
6 February 2025
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published a report on the implementation of the first phase of the short/medium term objectives in their interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) heatmap. In the report, the EBA sets out a number of observations and recommendations, including in relation to:- the materiality of non-maturity (NMD) behavioural assumptions and the complexity of their modelling. This includes a non-restrictive list of risk factors impacting NMD repricing behaviour and a toolkit to support supervisors in their analysis of NMD modelling.
- the complementary dimensions to the supervisory outlier test (SOT) on the Net Interest Income (NII) metric. The report discusses the additional dimensions that supervisors could consider for institutions defined as outliers.
- the expected approach to model and project commercial margins of NMD, which are subject to behavioural optionality, in the SOT on NII.
- hedging strategies.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision consults on amendments to principles for the management of credit risk
5 February 2025
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a consultative document on updating the principles for the management of credit risk. The principles, first issued in October 2000, provide guidelines for banking supervisory authorities to evaluate banks' credit risk management processes in four key areas: (i) establishing a suitable credit risk environment; (ii) operating under a sound credit-granting process; (iii) maintaining an appropriate credit administration, measurement and monitoring process; and (iv) ensuring adequate controls over credit risk.
The Basel Committee mandated a review of the principles in 2023, to determine if they remain fit for purpose given the developments in global financial markets related credit risks and trends and changes to the supervisory and regulatory landscape over the past 25 years. The review confirmed the ongoing relevance of the credit risk principles but identified certain parts that either have become obsolete, superseded and redundant or are not fully aligned with the current Basel Framework and the Basel Committee's guidance. Therefore, the Basel Committee proposes to make a limited set of technical amendments to align the principles with the current Basel Framework and the latest guidelines. A comparison against the 2000 version has been published alongside the consultation. The consultation is open to comments until 21 March 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU joint report on use of countercyclical capital buffer
31 January 2025
The European Central Bank and the European Systemic Risk Board have published a joint report on the use of the positive neutral countercyclical capital buffer (PN CCyB) in the EEA. This approach has gained traction among EEA countries in recent years as a way of increasing resilience over the financial cycle and enhancing financial stability.
The report addresses areas of commonality in the approaches adopted by EEA countries, including:- broad agreement on what a positive neutral approach means and what it is useful for.
- in most jurisdictions, there is no expectation that the PN CCyB will yield higher CCyB requirements at the peak of the cycle when cyclical systemic risks become elevated.
- there is broad consistency in the conditions that would guide authorities' decisions to release the CCyB.
- in most jurisdictions, the introduction of a PN CCyB does not need to be offset by a reduction in other capital requirements.
- clear and transparent communication is a key element in the introduction and use of a PN CCyB.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission adopts Delegated Regulation amending Regulatory Technical Standards on the supervisory delta of call and put options mapped to the commodity risk category
January 28, 2025
The European Commission adopted a Delegated Regulation amending Regulatory Technical Standards as regards the specification of the formula for calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options mapped to the commodity risk category. The RTS specify the formula for the purposes of Article 279a(3) of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation in the standardized approach for counterparty credit risk. CRR III expanded the scope of Article 279a(3) to cover commodity risk, which requires amendment to the RTS. The Council of the European Union and the European Parliament will now scrutinize the Delegated Regulation. If neither objects, the Regulation will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force 20 days after publication.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority response to HM Treasury November 2024 letter on remit and recommendations
January 27, 2025HM Treasury has published a letter (dated December 18, 2024) from Andrew Bailey, BoE Governor, in his role as Chair of the Prudential Regulation Committee. In the letter, Mr Bailey sets out the response of the PRC to HMT's November 2024 letter on recommendations for the PRC. The letter discusses actions taken by the PRA to advance the secondary competitiveness and growth objective and sets out the work the PRA is taking or planning to take in support of the specific recommendation to the PRC on government economic policy. This work includes planned consultations on: (i) the banking data review. The PRA plans to consult in the summer on reforms resulting from the first phase of the review, which will cover changes to reporting on Counterparty Credit Risk and explore the scope for returns that the PRA can delete outright; and (ii) the Senior Managers & Certification Regime. The PRA plans to consult in the coming months on proposals to increase the efficiency of the regime by providing greater flexibility and clarity to firms and individuals.Topic : Prudential Regulation
-
UK Financial Policy Committee response to HM Treasury November 2024 letter on remit and recommendations
January 27, 2025
HM Treasury has published a letter (dated 18 December 2024) from Andrew Bailey, Bank of England Governor, in his role as Chair of the Financial Policy Committee. In the letter, Mr Bailey sets out the response of the FPC to HMT's November 2024 letter on remit and recommendations for the FPC. The letter outlines the work of the FPC to help identify, monitor and address systemic risks to the resilience of the UK financial system and examples of work to support the government's economic policy. Included in this work, the FPC: (i) will continue to work in an open and collaborative way with other relevant bodies for the purpose of pursuing its financial stability objective. This includes working closely with the newly formed Financial Market Infrastructure Committee, to jointly discuss innovation in wholesale markets, including systemic stablecoins and tokenized assets; (ii) will continue to monitor the implementation and outcomes of the new critical third parties regime; (iii) plans to publish an assessment of channels of financial stability risks stemming from the adoption of AI and machine learning, as well as its approach to monitoring such risks in a report in H1 2025; (iv) will continue to consider the materiality of nature-related risks for its primary financial stability objective; and (v) will further update the O-SII buffer framework to ensure it is operating as intended.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority writes to domestic and international banks on its 2025 supervisory priorities
January 21, 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Dear CEO letter outlining its supervisory priorities for 2025 for domestic banks and international banks and large investment firms. The PRA's key areas of focus for 2025 include:- Risk management, governance and controls: firms' senior management, and boards need to ensure that their organizations have robust governance, risk management and controls frameworks in place that are adaptive and resilient, leveraging stress and scenario analyses to inform risk management, strategy and business planning. Firms are expected to have these frameworks in place across businesses, risk and internal audit functions, commensurate with the firm's business model. The PRA also notes that counterparty credit risk will remain an area of focus.
- Data risk: firms must continue to improve their ability to aggregate data to ensure that they have the information necessary to support holistic risk management, robust board decision-making, and accurate regulatory calculations. Throughout 2025 the PRA will continue to assess data accuracy.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority responds to Government on enhancing sustainable economic growth
January 20, 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a letter (dated January 15, 2025) from Sam Woods, PRA Deputy Governor and CEO, to the Government setting out the actions the PRA has taken, and will take, with a view to enhancing economic growth. Actions already addressed by the PRA include:- simplifying the prudential regime for small banks;
- proposing further amendments to remuneration requirements to enhance competitiveness; and
- simplifying regulatory data-reporting from banks.
The PRA also considers that broader changes could simplify and rationalize the U.K. regulatory regime in other ways, such as identifying potential overlaps between PRA's governance and disclosure requirements and those of legislation or other regulators. In the PRA's view, rationalizing the U.K. financial services regulators' "have regards" principles could lead to a simplification of the length and complexity of the analysis underpinning new regulations with consequential benefits for the cost of regulatory engagement by firms and efficient use of resources by the PRA. The principles relate to the number of principles regulators are required to "have regard" to and to which they are held to account for when exercising their powers. -
UK Chancellor announces engagement with financial services leaders to bolster growth plans
January 20, 2025
HM Treasury has announced that the Chancellor will increase engagement with financial services leaders to strengthen plans to grow the economy. Over the coming months, the Chancellor plans to host a series of Industry Forums with key sub-sector leaders in banking, insurance, and asset management to elicit views on delivering long-term growth. HMT explains that the Industry Forums, alongside extensive further engagement at official and ministerial levels, will ensure that industry and senior stakeholders are closely involved in the development of the upcoming Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy so that it tackles the key issues that matter most to the industry. The first meetings of the Industry Forums will run throughout January and February, reconvening ahead of the Government's publication of the Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy as part of the Industrial Strategy later this year. The Government will continue to work closely with industry following the publication of the Strategy, to ensure that it is implemented effectively. The Strategy, set to be published in the spring, aims to develop policies that foster growth in the financial services sector. -
UK Financial Conduct Authority responds to Government call for regulators to support growth
January 17, 2025
The Financial Conduct Authority has published a letter (dated January 16, 2025) from Nikhil Rathi, FCA Chief Executive, sent to the Government, setting out its work to ensure that it is supporting the Government's U.K. growth mission. The letter responds to Government's December call for regulators to support growth. In the letter, the FCA explains that to achieve the vast reforms, the FCA will need to take greater risks and prioritize resources. The Government's support and acceptance of this approach is required, including an acceptance that there will be failures because it will not be possible to prevent all harm under an approach based on risk-based choices. The FCA emphasizes that this acceptance needs to be shared across all accountability mechanisms, including in Parliament, and states that metrics for "tolerable failures" within the overall system would assist.
The areas addressed in the letter include:- unlocking capital investment and liquidity: in addition to the planned reforms for the wholesale markets, the FCA will fast-track a review of capital requirements for specialized trading firms to improve liquidity;
- accelerating digital innovation to enhance productivity: the FCA makes a number of suggestions on how to do this including introducing a new open banking payment method and developing open finance, the removal of the £100 contactless payment limit to enhance consumer flexibility and level the playing field with digital wallets. The FCA also suggests that government action could help by introducing digital identity authentication, enhancing the quality of the Companies House database to reduce costs for business, and digitalizing court systems to reduce delays;
Read more. -
UK delays the implementation of Basel 3.1
January 17, 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority has announced that, in consultation with HM Treasury, it has decided to delay the implementation of Basel 3.1 in the U.K. by one year until January 1, 2027. The PRA explains that it has decided to delay the implementation to allow more time for greater clarity to emerge about implementation plans in the U.S. and to take into account competitiveness and growth considerations. While the PRA now expects to implement on January 1, 2027, it will continue to monitor developments. The transitional periods in the rules will be reduced to ensure the date of full implementation remains on January 1, 2030. The PRA is also immediately pausing until further notice the data collection exercise intended to inform an off-cycle review of firm-specific Pillar 2 capital requirements. Also in light of the delay to implementation, the end-date of the time window to join the Interim Capital Regime, previously set as February 28, 2025, will be moved back. The PRA will provide further information in due course.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority publishes draft guidelines on ESG scenario analysis
January 16, 2025
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper on its draft guidelines on ESG scenario analysis. For institutions using the internal ratings-based approach for calculating the own funds requirements for credit risk, these guidelines are intended to specify the way in which ESG risks, and in particular, physical and transition risks stemming from climate change, are taken into account in the scenarios used for credit risk internal stress testing. They: (i) specify the different uses institutions should make of scenario analysis and propose a progressive and proportionate approach to incorporating scenario analysis into the institution management system; (ii) provide guidance on what is required before undertaking a scenario analysis and more specifically on the criteria for setting scenarios and identifying the transmission channels for translating climate risks into financial risks; and (iii) specify the distinctive features to be taken into account when conducting a climate stress test in addition to the requirements set out in the guidelines on institutions' stress testing and the use of scenarios to help define and adjust the institution's strategy and test the robustness of its business model to a range of plausible futures. These guidelines complement the EBA guidelines on the management of ESG risks, published earlier this month. The EBA will hold a virtual public hearing on the consultation on March 17, 2025, and the deadline for comments is April 16, 2025. The EBA plans for the guidelines to be finalized by the second half of 2025, and apply from January 11, 2026 to institutions other than small and non-complex institutions and, at the latest, from January 11, 2027 for SNCI. -
Financial Stability Board analytical framework and toolkit to assess climate-related vulnerabilities
January 16, 2025
The Financial Stability Board published a report containing a framework and analytical toolkit to assess climate-related vulnerabilities. The report introduces an analytical framework that the FSB will use to trace how physical and transition climate risks can be transmitted and amplified by the global financial system. The framework builds on the existing FSB Financial Stability Surveillance Framework and focuses on assessing climate-related vulnerabilities holistically, particularly from a cross-border and cross-sectoral point of view. The accompanying toolkit to the framework comprises three categories of metrics to monitor climate-related vulnerabilities from a forward-looking perspective. These are: (i) proxies to provide early signals on potential drivers of transition and physical risks; (ii) exposure metrics to gauge the extent of direct and indirect exposures in the real economy and the financial system; and (iii) risk metrics to quantify the impacts for financial institutions and the system as a whole. The FSB notes that while these metrics are already used by some FSB members domestically, various methodological and data challenges need to be overcome for them to be used for global monitoring. The FSB notes that the framework and toolkit are live documents, to be refined as understanding evolves on how climate-related vulnerabilities affect financial stability and as methodological and data issues are resolved. As such, the FSB will continue to develop the framework by operationalizing the toolkit and conducting in-depth analyses of specific climate vulnerabilities that may have global financial stability implications. -
European Banking Authority consults on draft technical standards on the prudential treatment of crypto-assets exposures
January 8, 2025
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper on its draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the calculation and aggregation of crypto-exposure values under the Capital Requirements Regulation 3. The RTS specify the technical elements necessary for institutions to calculate and aggregate crypto-asset exposures in relation to the prudential treatment of such exposures. The RTS aim to address implementation aspects and ensure harmonization of the capital requirements on crypto-assets exposures by institutions across the EU.
The draft RTS also further develop the relevant capital treatment for credit risk, counterparty credit risk, market risk and credit valuation adjustment risk for 'asset reference tokens' and 'other' crypto-assets exposures and align, to the extent possible, the capital treatment with the elements specified in the Basel standard on prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority finalizes amendments to resolution assessment reporting and disclosure dates
January 7, 2025
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement on amendments to resolution assessment reporting and disclosure dates. The statement provides feedback to responses the PRA received to its consultation paper (CP12/24) on the same topic. It also contains the PRA's final policy which provides greater flexibility over the timing of Resolution Assessment report submissions and disclosures by moving from fixed two-year cycles to a periodic basis. The final policy takes effect on January 10, 2025.
The PRA's final policy is reflected in: (i) amendments to the Resolution Assessment Part of the PRA Rulebook, which can be found in Appendix 1 of the statement; and (ii) an updated supervisory statement (SS4/19) on resolution assessment and public disclosure by firms, found in Appendix 2.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank issues statement on framework for assessing capital buffers of other systemically important institutions
December 20, 2024
The European Central Bank has published a statement on its framework for assessing capital buffers of other systemically important institutions. In the statement, the ECB announced that it will enhance the floor methodology used to assess capital buffers for O-SIIs so that it also takes into account the systemic importance of O-SIIs for the banking union as a whole. This will lead to a more consistent treatment of O-SIIs across Member States participating in the banking union. The effect of these changes will be that for each O-SII at the highest level of consolidation within the banking union, the O-SII buffer should be no less than the higher of the minimum buffer rates implied by the banking union perspective and the national perspective. Moreover, the enhanced methodology will contribute to deepening financial integration by reducing the current disparity between capital requirements for domestic and cross-border activities within the banking union.
The ECB began using the enhanced floor methodology to assess O-SII buffers notified by national authorities from January 1, 2024, with the enhanced methodology being fully phased in as of January 1, 2028.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK authorities consult on operational incident and third-party reporting
December 13, 2024
The Financial Conduct Authority, Prudential Regulation Authority, and the Bank of England have launched consultations on operational incident and third-party reporting. The regulators propose to establish a framework to enhance incident and third-party risk management, strengthen firms' operational resilience and minimize harm. To achieve this, the regulators propose a definition for an operational incident and introduce new material third-party reporting rules. The proposals introduce standardized reporting templates to allow the regulators to collect data which would be used to monitor and respond to potential risks arising from operational incidents and firms' increasing reliance on third parties.
The deadline for comments is March 13, 2025. The FCA intends to publish finalized rules in H2 2025. The PRA and the BoE propose that the implementation date for the proposals will be no earlier than H2 2026. You may like to see our client bulletin, "Operational incident reporting: UK financial regulators propose new rules", which goes into the details of these proposals. -
Final Basel Committee guidelines for counterparty credit risk management
December 11, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published the final version of its guidelines for counterparty credit risk management, replacing its "Sound Practices for Banks' Interactions with Highly Leveraged Institutions" (originally published in January 1999). The guidelines provide a supervisory response to the significant shortcomings that have been identified in banks' management of CCR, including the lessons learned from recent episodes of non-bank financial intermediary distress.
The guidelines include the need to: (i) conduct comprehensive due diligence both at initial onboarding and on an ongoing basis; (ii) develop a comprehensive credit risk mitigation strategy to manage counterparty exposures effectively; (iii) measure, control and limit CCR using a wide variety of complementary metrics; and (iv) build a strong CCR governance framework. Banks and supervisors are encouraged to take a risk-based and proportional approach in the application of the guidelines. The Basel Committee will continue to monitor implementation of the guidelines on an ongoing basis.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EMIR 3 Published in the Official Journal of the European Union
December 4, 2024
The EMIR 3 Regulation and Directive have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will enter into force on December 24, 2024. The EMIR 3 Regulation amends the European Market Infrastructure Regulation and applies from December 24, 2024, except for the amendments to the calculation of the clearing thresholds for financial counterparties and non-financial counterparties which will only apply once the related technical standards enter into force. The EMIR 3 Directive amends the Directive on Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities, the Capital Requirements Directive and Investment Firm Directive. Member States must transpose the EMIR 3 Directive into national laws and bring those into force by June 25, 2026. This aligns with the implementation date for CRD VI.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Policy Statement on Definition of an Interim Capital Regime Firm
November 29, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published its final policy statement and statement of policy relating to the definition of an Interim Capital Regime firm and an ICR consolidation entity. The policy statement explains the means by which ICR-eligible firms can join the ICR. Joining the ICR will enable eligible firms to preserve their current capital requirements from the implementation date (i.e., January 1, 2026) of the Basel 3.1 standards, until the implementation of the permanent Small Domestic Deposit Taker capital regime. The PRA is currently consulting on proposals to revoke the ICR when the SDDT capital regime is implemented.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England System-Wide Exploratory Scenario Exercise and 2024 Central Counterparty Supervisory Stress Test
November 29, 2024
The Bank of England has published the final report on its system-wide exploratory scenario. The SWES was a 'system-wide' exercise, incorporating a wide range of financial firms and business models, focusing not on the resilience of individual participants, but the impact on important U.K. financial markets.
Through running the SWES, the BoE, working closely with and with the full support of the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, and the Pensions Regulator, has drawn key financial stability conclusions, including that actions taken by authorities and market participants following recent market shocks have improved gilt market resilience, but further work is required given the other vulnerabilities highlighted by this exercise. The BoE considers that the SWES has proven to be an effective tool to understand system-level vulnerabilities. The BoE, alongside the FCA, will use the experience as a framework for future system-wide analysis and embed it into how market-wide surveillance is conducted. To support this the BoE will invest in its in-house capacity to model system-wide dynamics, supported by continuing engagement with market participants.
The BoE also published the results of its 2024 CCP Supervisory Stress Test. In the core credit stress test, the BoE found that all three U.K. CCPs have adequate pre-funded resources to cover a severe stress scenario and the default of the 'Cover-2' members—the two members whose default generates the greatest depletion of mutualized resources at the CCP. The BoE identified that in some very extreme but plausible scenarios there may be a risk to CCPs, and will follow-up with CCPs to probe how they capture the risks identified by these hypothetical scenarios via their own stress testing. -
Bank of England Amends Approach to Stress Testing UK Banking System
November 29, 2024
The Bank of England has updated its approach to stress testing the U.K. banking system. From 2025 onwards, the BoE will move from an annual to a biennial frequency for its main bank capital stress test. This will be a test of risks related to the financial cycle in which the largest and most systemic U.K. banks participate and will be used to inform the setting of capital buffers for the banking system and individual banks. In the intervening years, the BoE will use stress testing when appropriate to supplement its assessment of the resilience of the banking system to cyclical risks. The BoE will continue to use exploratory exercises as a means of assessing other risks, including structural and emerging risks that are not closely linked to the financial cycle. The scope of firms involved in the tests in intervening years will depend on the risks being assessed. When deciding on the timing of these exercises, the BoE will consider the risk environment and the sequencing and timing of the stress tests described above. The next bank capital stress test will take place in 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Report on Countercyclical Capital Buffer
November 28, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a report on the range of practices in implementing a positive neutral countercyclical capital buffer. The CCyB aims to ensure that banking sector capital requirements take account of the macro-financial environment in which banks operate, in order to increase the resilience of the banking sector and maintain the flow of credit to the real economy during periods of stress. A positive neutral CCyB is a CCyB that is set at a rate above zero at a time when risks are judged to be neither subdued nor elevated. The Basel Committee observes that authorities that have introduced a positive neutral CCyB have found it helpful for banks in their jurisdictions to have buffers of capital in place that can be released in the event of sudden shocks, including those unrelated to the credit cycle, such as the Covid-19 pandemic.
The report builds on prior publications on the same topic by examining the observed range of practices adopted by jurisdictions which have chosen to implement a positive neutral CCyB. It considers the different jurisdictional frameworks for implementing a positive neutral CCyB, describes the various observed approaches to the calibration and operation of the buffer, and discusses reciprocity considerations. The Basel Committee emphasizes that the adoption of a positive neutral CCyB approach is not required, and the report does not seek to discuss or opine on the merits or demerits of a positive neutral CCyB relative to other macroprudential measures or tools. Some jurisdictions may use tools other than the positive neutral CCyB to address similar risks, based on their specific jurisdictional circumstances.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Hedging of Counterparty Credit Risk Exposures
November 27, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation on technical amendments on the hedging of counterparty credit risk exposures. The interpretative issues addressed relate to the circumstance where a bank has a derivative exposure and uses a guarantee or credit default swap to hedge the CCR arising from the derivative counterparty. While the CCR rules include a specific approach for the recognition of collateral, the recognition of guarantees or credit derivatives, such as CDSs, is not explicitly addressed, suggesting that banks may use the substitution approach of the credit risk mitigation framework. To address this inconsistency, the Basel Committee proposes amendments to the credit risk and CCR standards, which aim to better align the treatment of guarantees and credit derivative protection with the treatment of eligible collateral in the CCR framework. The proposed amendments do not affect the need for banks to check whether the requirements in CRE22.81 and CRE40 are met and need to be applied accordingly. Responses may be submitted until January 31, 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Finalizes Various Technical Amendments to the Basel Framework
November 27, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a document on the finalization of various technical amendments to the Basel framework. The amendments relate to: (i) the definition of specialized lending in the standardized approach to credit risk (to better align it with the definition in the internal ratings-based approach); and (ii) the curvature charge for Group 2a cryptoassets in the cryptoasset exposure standard to align the treatment with other asset classes. Basel Committee members have agreed to implement the technical amendments set out in this document as soon as practical, within three years at the latest. The technical amendment to SCO60.80 will be implemented as part of the final cryptoasset exposures standard, i.e., from January 1, 2026. The amendments were published for consultation in July and have been finalized as originally proposed.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulators Consult on Compensation Reform
November 26, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority have published a joint consultation on compensation reform. The consultation paper sets out proposed amendments to the remuneration part of the PRA Rulebook, Supervisory Statement SS2/17 and the FCA's associated non-Handbook Guidance relating to compensation for dual-regulated firms. The proposals complement previous compensation regime changes enhancing proportionality for small firms, and removing the bonus cap.
Read more. -
HM Treasury Publishes Prudential Regulation of Credit Institutions (Meaning of CRR Rules and Recognised Exchange) (Amendment) Regulations 2024
November 21, 2024
HM Treasury has published the Prudential Regulation of Credit Institutions (Meaning of CRR Rules and Recognised Exchange) (Amendment) Regulations 2024, together with an explanatory memorandum.
The Regulations have two primary purposes: (i) Regulations 2 and 3 make amendments to primary legislation in connection with the revocation of the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation, which currently forms part of assimilated law on financial services. Regulation 2 amends the definition of "CRR rules" in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to include rules made by the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority as part of Basel 3.1 implementation to replace CRR provisions revoked under the Financial Services and Market Act 2023. Regulation 3 makes a related amendment to section 5 of the Financial Services Act 2021 to ensure that certain requirements apply to those rules; and (ii) Regulation 4 amends the definition of "recognized exchange" as contained in the CRR. This will support an expansion of investment exchanges that fall within the definition of a "recognized exchange". The Regulations specify that investment exchanges can qualify as a "recognized exchange" if they are: (a) U.K.-based investment exchanges that are considered to be regulated markets; (b) in the register of Recognized Overseas Investment Exchanges, a regime owned by the FCA; or (c) an investment exchange, which meets certain conditions as set out in the PRA's rulebook. For this purpose, the PRA expects to make rules on the proposed "conditions", which will help firms identify a "recognized exchange". The PRA plans to consult on its conditions shortly. The Regulations come into force on November 22, 2024.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Outcome of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision November 2024 Meeting
November 20, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has set out the outcomes from its meeting on November 19-20, 2024. Key takeaways include:- implementation of Basel III—committee members unanimously reaffirmed their expectation of implementing all aspects of the Basel III framework in full, consistently and as soon as possible;
- non-bank financial intermediation—the BCBS approved a final set of guidelines that seek to address weaknesses in banks' counterparty credit risk management exposed in recent episodes of NBFI distress. The finalized guidelines will be published next month;
- 2023 banking turmoil—an update on the BCBS's work to develop a suite of practical tools to support supervisors in their day-to-day work as part of its efforts to strengthen supervisory effectiveness in light of the lessons learned from last year's banking turmoil will be published in early 2025;
- macroprudential policy—the BCBS will publish a report on existing practices to support jurisdictions that wish to apply positive cycle-neutral rates when risks are judged to be neither subdued nor elevated. The report will be published next month; and
- climate-related financial risks—the BCBS anticipates finalizing its proposed Pillar 3 disclosure framework in H1 2025.
-
Financial Stability Board Publishes Letter to G20 Leaders and 2024 Annual Report
November 18, 2024
The Financial Stability Board has published a letter sent to the G20 leaders ahead of their meeting on November 18, 2024, together with the FSB 2024 annual report. The letter warns of ongoing vulnerabilities within the global financial system, illustrated by recent episodes of market turmoil and the failure of several banks and non-banks in recent years. The letter stresses the importance of effective implementation of the FSB's policies, emphasizing that authorities must not only put policies into national laws and regulations, but also build the capacity to operationalize them.
In the annual report, the FSB provides an overview of its work in its key priority areas, which include: (i) addressing lessons from the March 2023 banking turmoil; (ii) enhancing the resilience of non-bank financial intermediation; (iii) addressing financial risks from climate change; (iv) improving cross-border payments; (v) responding to technological innovation; and (vi) enhancing the resolvability of central counterparties. Looking ahead, the FSB will continue to focus on these priority areas and will also place an emphasis on: (a) implementation monitoring of its recommendations on crypto-asset activities and global stablecoin arrangements; (b) further work on resolution reforms; and (c) regular monitoring and progress reports on financial stability issues.
For more information on the issues and developments relating to FinTech, see our blog A&O Shearman on fintech and digital assets. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Policy Statement on the April Occasional Consultation Paper
October 31, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement to its occasional consultation paper (CP6/24). The statement provides feedback to responses the PRA received to the consultation paper, as well as the PRA's final policy, as follows: (i) amendments to the Disclosure (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook; (ii) amendments to the Reporting (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook; (iii) amendments to the Regulatory Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook; (iv) amendments to the Glossary of the PRA Rulebook; and (v) the addition of a new Rule 9.5A to the Policyholder Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook (Policyholder Protection).
The statement also provides feedback to responses in relation to a proposal in CP6/24, which was a joint consultation with the FCA (FCA Consultation paper 24/10). It also contains the PRA's and U.K. Financial Conduct Authority's final policy in the form of amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251. The regulators are making consequential amendments to the BTS to ensure they reflect the expected changes to the U.K. version of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation that will be made in the Securitisation (Amendment) Regulations 2024. The implementation date for these amendments is November 4, 2024 with the exception of the amendments to U.K. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251, which will be effective on November 1, 2024, which is when the final Technical Standards instrument by the PRA and FCA comes into force.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delegated Regulation Amending CRR Postponing Application Date of Own Funds Requirement for Market Risk Published in the OJ
October 31, 2024
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 amending the EU Capital Requirements Regulation with regard to the date of application of the own funds requirements for market risk has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Delegated Regulation inserts a new Article 520a into the CRR that states, until January 1, 2026, institutions must continue to apply Part Three, Title IV, and the market risk requirements of Articles 430, 430b, 445 and 455 of the CRR. CRR III introduced into the CRR specific disclosure requirements for market risk, tailored to the requirements laid down in the fundamental review of the trading book for the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk. This Delegated Regulation delays the date of application of these provisions to January 1, 2026. For reasons of consistency, the related specific disclosure requirements will also be delayed. The Delegated Regulation will enter into force on November 1, 2024, the day after its publication in the Official Journal, and will apply from January 1, 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Speech on Artificial Intelligence and Financial Stability
October 31, 2024
The Bank of England has published a speech by Sarah Breeden, BoE Deputy Governor, Financial Stability, on AI and financial stability. In the speech, Ms. Breeden explores the novel features of Generative AI, and how financial stability can be upheld whilst harnessing its potential benefits for economic growth.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Structural Foreign Exchange Positions under EU Capital Requirements Regulation
October 24, 2024
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the treatment of structural foreign exchange positions under Article 104c of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation and on reporting on structural foreign exchange positions. The draft RTS largely retain the provisions of the EBA's 2020 guidelines. The key changes are: (i) the introduction of a clear quantitative threshold for a currency to be considered eligible for the structural FX treatment; (ii) the option for banks to consider only credit risk own funds requirements when determining the position neutralising the sensitivity to the capital ratios, as long as the credit risk own funds requirements are the ones driving the variability of the ratio against FX changes; (iii) clarifications around how institutions should remove the risk position from the own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk; and (iv) provisions relating to institutions' policies on currencies that are particularly illiquid in the market. The changes are not expected to lead to a material capital impact. The consultation also sets out a proposed policy framework for the treatment of structural FX positions. The deadline for comments is February 7, 2025.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Large Exposures Framework
October 18, 2024
The U.K Prudential Regulation Authority began consulting on proposals to amend the prudential framework for large exposures. The proposals include changes to implement the remaining Basel large exposures standards, by: (i) removing the possibility for firms to use internal model methods to calculate exposure values to securities financing transactions; and (ii) introducing a mandatory substitution approach to calculate the effect of the use of credit risk mitigation techniques.
Other changes the PRA is consulting on include: (a) removing the option for firms to exceed LE limits for trading book exposures to third parties; (b) allowing firms to exceed LE limits for trading book exposures to intragroup entities, and simplifying the calculation of the additional capital requirements; (c) allowing firms to apply for higher LE limits to exposures to intragroup entities, and amend the conditions firms need to meet to mitigate the higher concentration risk; (d) removing the exemption from LE limits to firms' exposures to the U.K. deposit guarantee scheme; (e) removing the option for firms to use immovable property as CRM; and (f) removing the stricter requirements on exposures to certain French counterparties.
The deadline for comments is January 17, 2025. The implementation date for the changes would, except for the proposal on SFTs, take effect shortly after publication of the final policy statement. The proposal to remove the possibility for firms to use initial margin methods to calculate exposure values to SFTs would take effect on January 1, 2026. The PRA proposes to offer firms that currently have a modification by consent under rules 2.1 and 2.2 of the Large Exposures Part of the PRA Rulebook a modification by consent to maintain the current position until March 2026.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Restatement of Remainder of UK Capital Requirements Regulation
October 15, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper on the restatement of the remaining provisions of the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation. The consultation paper sets out the PRA's proposals to restate the relevant provisions in the assimilated CRR in the PRA Rulebook and other policy material such as supervisory statements or statements of policy. The PRA also proposes to update the credit ratings mapping tables in some assimilated Technical Standards and to restate them in the PRA Rulebook. The proposals in the consultation consist primarily of the restatement of assimilated law into PRA rules and policy materials without modifications. There are a few instances where the consultation proposes to modify certain areas as part of their restatement. The PRA notes that more substantive proposals relate to proposed changes to the securitization requirements. The deadline for comments is January 15, 2025. -
UK Resolution Authority Consults on Amendments to Approach for Setting MREL
October 15, 2024
The Bank of England has published a consultation paper on amendments to its statement of policy on setting the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities. The proposals are designed to ensure that the U.K.'s MREL framework: (i) is simplified and consolidated where possible, to make it easier to navigate and implement; (ii) keeps up to date with, and is responsive to, wider developments in financial regulation and markets; (iii) remains aligned with international standards; and (iv) adapts over time to reflect lessons learnt from its implementation.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Standards Publishes Progress Report on the 2023 Banking Turmoil and Liquidity Risk
October 11, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Standards has published a progress report on the 2023 banking turmoil and liquidity risk. The report, requested by the G20 Brazilian Presidency, provides an update on the Basel Committee's analytical work on liquidity risk dynamics observed during the turmoil, building on the Committee's stocktake report published in October 2023. The report includes updated empirical analysis on a range of liquidity-related issues highlighted by the turmoil, including distressed banks' outflow rates, the materiality of different liquidity risk factors, and the role and use of supervisory monitoring tools. Drawing on the findings of this progress report, the Basel Committee plans to pursue a series of follow-up initiatives related to the turmoil, including: (i) prioritizing work to strengthen supervisory effectiveness and identify issues that could merit additional guidance at a global level; and (ii) pursuing additional follow-up analytical work based on empirical evidence to assess whether specific features of the Basel Framework, such as liquidity risk and interest rate risk in the banking book, performed as intended during the turmoil and assess the need to explore policy options over the medium term. -
HM Treasury Publishes Policy Statement on Treatment of Overseas Investment Exchanges Under UK Capital Requirements Regulation
October 7, 2024
HM Treasury has published a policy statement on the treatment of overseas investment exchanges for the purposes of the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation. HM Treasury initially proposed to expand the definition of 'recognized exchanges' in the U.K. CRR to include those in the Recognized Overseas Investment Exchange regime and those detailed in the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority's technical standards that accompany the U.K. CRR definition. Following feedback that these proposals would be insufficient in restoring competitiveness with other jurisdictions (there are 30 exchanges in the ROIE regime compared to the EU's list of 108 exchanges), HM Treasury has amended its proposals. HM Treasury will add the link to the ROIE regime as initially proposed, but rather than refer to the PRA's technical standards, the CRR definition will refer to a set of conditions that will come to be specified in the PRA rulebook for the purpose of identifying recognized exchanges or assets traded on such exchanges. The PRA will therefore formulate new rules for the purposes of identifying recognized exchanges and intends to consult on these as soon as is practicable. Until the rules are made, qualifying exchanges will include those that are domestic U.K. investment exchanges and those in the ROIE regime, once the necessary legislation is made. -
Draft UK Prudential Regulation of Credit Institutions (Meaning of CRR Rules and Recognised Exchange) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 Published
October 7, 2024
The draft U.K. Prudential Regulation of Credit Institutions (Meaning of CRR Rules and Recognised Exchange) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 have been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The purpose of the Regulations is to ensure that the revocation of the onshored Capital Requirements Regulation under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (which is yet to take effect) will not impact the U.K.'s approach to implementation of Basel 3.1, which has been delegated to the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority in accordance with the U.K. government's smarter regulatory framework. Regulation 2 amends the definition of "CRR rules" in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to include rules made by the PRA as part of Basel 3.1 implementation to replace CRR provisions revoked under FSMA 2023. This ensures that the FSMA 2000 accountability framework will continue to apply to the PRA's new rules. Regulation 3 makes a related amendment to section 5 of the Financial Services Act 2021 to ensure that certain requirements apply to those rules. Regulation 4 expands the definition of a "recognized exchange" in the CRR so that a wider range of instruments can benefit from preferential capital treatment. It does this by allowing overseas investment exchanges to be brought into the definition. This will include those exchanges on the Recognized Overseas Investment Exchanges register, and eventually it will also include exchanges where they meet conditions set by the PRA, which will be consulted on shortly. The instrument will enter into force the day after the day on which it is made. HM Treasury has published a separate policy statement on the treatment of overseas investment exchanges under CRR. -
UK Financial Policy Committee Publishes Latest Summary and Record
October 2, 2024
The Bank of England has published the record of the Financial Policy Committee meeting on September 19, 2024. Headline judgements and policy actions from the meeting: (i) risks to U.K. financial stability are broadly unchanged since the June 2024, although significant financial market and global vulnerabilities remain; (ii) there was a significant spike in volatility across global financial markets in August. Although short-lived, the FPC notes that the extent of the moves, in response to relatively limited economic news, illustrates the potential for vulnerabilities in market-based finance to amplify shocks; (iii) the U.K. banking system remains in a strong position to support households and businesses, even if economic and financial conditions were substantially worse than expected.
The FPC decided to maintain the U.K. countercyclical capital buffer at its neutral rate of 2% and as part of its annual review of the leverage ratio Direction, the FPC confirmed that the U.K. leverage ratio framework remained appropriate. The FPC's next meeting will be on November 15, and the record will be published on November 29, 2024.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Restatement of UK Capital Requirements Regulation Rulebook Requirements
September 12, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on its proposals to restate, and in some cases modify, the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation requirements relating to the definition of own funds in its own rulebook. The PRA rules will replace the existing definition of own funds under CRR, which HM Treasury is proposing to revoke under draft legislation published on September 12, 2024 (discussed above).
The PRA proposes to restate in its rules the vast majority of the current U.K. CRR requirements in this area, with some modifications to ensure their operability in the PRA Rulebook, and to omit some provisions that are not necessary or relevant for U.K. firms. The PRA also proposes to make some minor adjustments to enhance the proportionality or transparency of the PRA's approach covering the following elements of the definition of own funds framework: (i) proportionality in the Pre/Post-Issuance Notification regime; (ii) inclusion of interim profits in Common Equity Tier 1 capital resources; (iii) reduction of Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments; (iv) clarification of the regulatory capital treatment of non-CET1 shares; (v) a requirement for PRA permission for additional forms of capital reduction; and (vi) permitting the terms governing CET1 instruments to reflect the possibility of (but not commit to) a future capital reduction.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Streamlining Pillar 2A Capital Framework and Capital Communications Process
September 12, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on streamlining the Pillar 2A capital framework and capital communications process. In addition to PRA-regulated banks, building societies, designated investment firms and PRA-approved or PRA-designated holding companies, the revised rules will also be relevant to Small Domestic Deposit Takers, firms who meet the SDDT criteria and are considering becoming a SDDT and firms that anticipate being subject to the Interim Capital Regime. The deadline for comments is December 12, 2024.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Second Near-Final Policy Statement on Implementation of the Basel 3.1 Standards
September 12, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published its second near-final Policy Statement on the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards. The PRA has decided to move the implementation date by a further six months to January 1, 2026 with a transitional period of 4 years to ensure full implementation by January 1, 2030.
The policy statement provides feedback to responses to the following sections of the PRA's Consultation Paper 16/22: Chapter 3 – credit risk – standardized approach; Chapter 4 – credit risk – internal ratings based approach; Chapter 5 - credit risk mitigation; Chapter 9 - output floor; Chapter 11 - disclosure (Pillar 3); and Chapter 12 - reporting. The statement also contains feedback to responses on the parts of Pillar 2 relating to the Pillar 2A credit risk methodology, use of IRB approach benchmarks, and the interaction with the output floor.
Read more.
-
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Simplified Capital Regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers
September 12, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on its proposed simplified capital regime and additional liquidity simplifications for small domestic deposit takers. This consultation forms the second phase of the PRA's simplified prudential regulation for SDDTs, the PRA having already finalised its requirements in relation to non-capital related prudential regulation, along with the criteria that must be met to be a SDDT. Together with the Phase 1 simplifications, the proposals would create a simpler, more certain and less costly capital regime for SDDTs.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Updates to UK Policy Framework for Capital Buffers
September 12, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on amendments to the U.K. framework on capital buffers under the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-Prudential Measures) Regulations (CBR), which will be revoked. HM Treasury has published a draft statutory instrument that will restate certain of the CBR provisions. Other provisions under the CBR will be transferred to the PRA's rulebook. The CBR sets out the statutory framework for the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), Capital Conservation Buffer (CcoB), Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SII) buffer, Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) buffer and the Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB).
The PRA's consultation does not propose changes to its policy approach to capital buffers, but rather streamlines some of its policy materials to enhance usability and clarity. The PRA may make further amendments to its proposals depending on the outcome of HM Treasury's proposed changes to the CBR. The PRA proposes to: (i) revoke the U.K. Technical Standards on the methodology for the identification of G-SIIs; (ii) introduce a new Statement of Policy (SoP) setting out the PRA's approach to G-SII identification and buffers, which will replace the aforementioned U.K. Technical Standards and relevant provisions to be revoked in the CBR; (iii) make minor amendments to the PRA's existing Statements of Policy on O-SII designation and O-SII buffer setting to reflect proposed amendments to the CBR; and (iv) make minor consequential amendments to PRA rules that refer directly to the current CBR.
The deadline for responses to the PRA's consultation is December 12, 2024. The PRA proposes that the implementation date for the changes will be Q2 2025. -
HM Treasury Publishes Policy Update on Applying the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 Model to the UK Capital Requirements Regulations
September 12, 2024
HM Treasury has published a policy update to confirm its legislative approach for applying the "FSMA model" to the assimilated EU capital requirements regime under the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Buffers Regulations. The application of the Financial Services and Markets Act model, which transfers firm-facing rulemaking powers to the regulators, will take place in three stages. HM Treasury will: (i) revoke articles of the U.K. CRR which the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority will replace with rules in order to implement the Basel 3.1 package; (ii) revoke any U.K. CRR provisions left on the statute book following Basel 3.1 implementation and revoke and restate (with modifications) the CBR; and (iii) publish new legislation to: (a) restate the U.K. CRR equivalence regimes in legislation (with the exception of the Article 142 regime); (b) restate (with certain modifications) key U.K. CRR definitions which are needed to ensure that the overall framework continues to operate as intended; and (c) make any consequential amendments to other parts of the statute book which will be needed once the U.K. CRR has been completely revoked.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Thematic Findings of Internal Audit Review of the Credit Risk Management Framework
September 10, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has sent a letter to lenders' chief risk officers to share the thematic findings from an internal audit review of non-systemic U.K. deposit takers' credit risk management framework. Approximately two-thirds of the findings related to notable breaches of rules around lending. The PRA considers that its observations reinforce the need for some firms to continue to enhance their portfolio management controls and affordability assessments, with consideration of changes in the macroeconomic environment to ensure that new lending is sustainable. The PRA sets out the key improvements that were identified in the following areas (in priority order based on the number of findings): affordability assessment, quality assurance and underwriting process, quality of management information, credit risk appetite, lending policy and collections. The PRA recommends that lenders use the points outlined in the letter as a reference when they next review and assess their credit risk management framework controls and potential areas that might need strengthening.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Direction for Modification by Consent for Leverage Ratio Requirements
September 10, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has announced that it is reviewing the leverage ratio requirement thresholds and is offering a modification by consent, where certain conditions are met, to disapply the relevant part of the PRA Rulebook until the review is complete. The modification by consent is available to a firm if it: (i) did not meet the criteria set out in 1.1 of the Leverage Ratio – Leverage Ratio – Capital Requirements and Buffers Part of the PRA Rulebook before September 10, 2024; and (ii) expects to meet the criteria after the next accounting reference date or any accounting reference date before December 31, 2025. This modification will cease to have effect at the end of June 30, 2026, however the PRA may revoke the modification earlier, at an appropriate time following the completion of the review.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Euopean Commission report on the future of European competitiveness
September 10, 2024
The European Commission has published a report on the future of European competitiveness, prepared by Mario Draghi, former President of the European Central Bank. The report aims to set out a new industrial strategy for Europe to overcome barriers to the EU's competitive strength. It sets out priority proposals in the short and medium term in key strategic sectors. For financial regulation, the report focuses on the completion of the Capital Markets Union and the Banking Union.
Read more. -
UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Commencement No 7) Regulations 2024 Published
September 3, 2024
The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Commencement No 7) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/891) have been made. The Regulations revoke certain instruments listed in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 relating to securitization, specifically: (i) the Securitisation Regulations 2018; (ii) provisions of the retained EU Securitisation Regulation that have not already been revoked; and (iii) the retained instruments that amended or supplemented the Securitisation Regulation and Capital Requirements Regulation. These instruments are to be revoked so that the new U.K. securitization framework, established under the Securitisation Regulations 2024 can come into force on November 1, 2024 as provided for by the Securitisation (Amendment) Regulations 2024. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Market Risk Framework
August 13, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published its final amendments to the Regulatory Technical Standards on the market risk framework, also known as the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation III introduced a number of changes to the FRTB, as implemented in the EU via CRR II, and consequently mandated the EBA to review its RTS in areas where the underlying CRR legal basis has been amended, namely on the treatment of foreign-exchange and commodity risk in the banking book, the profit and loss attribution test, and the risk factor modellability assessment. The EBA's RTS therefore amend the following: (i) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2059, which sets out the details on the profit and loss attribution test. The amending RTS remove the aggregation formula for computing the total own funds requirements for market risk for an institution using the alternative internal model approach as this formula has been now introduced in the CRR III; (ii) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/2060, which relates to the risk factors' modellability assessment. The amending RTS ensure that institutions are able to identify how far they rely on a third-party vendor for the purpose of assessing the modellability of a risk factor; and (iii) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1577, which relates to the treatment of foreign exchange and commodity risk in the non-trading book. The amending RTS ensure that translation risk is duly captured by institutions. The EBA will submit the final draft RTS to the European Commission for endorsement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Responds to European Commission's Delegated Act Postponing Application of Market Risk Framework
August 12, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published a no-action letter in response to the European Commission's postponement of the application of the revised market risk framework, also known as the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book. In the no-action letter, the EBA recommends that competent authorities should not prioritize any supervisory or enforcement action relating to the amendments to the provisions setting the boundary between the banking and trading books, or those defining internal risk transfers between books. The EBA also clarifies that the points it made in its separate no-action letter on the same topic issued in 2023 should remain applicable. The EBA considers that the front-loaded application of the revised provisions on the boundary and internal risk transfers, compared to the rest of the FRTB framework, would subject institutions to an operationally complex, fragmented, and costly two-step implementation. There are also no jurisdictions at the global level that envisage such a two-step implementation of the FRTB framework. This means that a front-loaded application of the boundary provisions would lead to global institutions being subject to very different regulatory requirements depending on where the risk management is performed, leading to a fragmentation of the regulatory framework. In a separate document, the EBA shares some considerations on technical questions and implementation issues arising from the postponement, that were deemed material and relevant with a view to achieving a harmonised implementation of the market risk framework across institutions during the postponement period. The EBA also provides clarity on the supervisory benchmarking exercise. The EBA considers that a legislative proposal to provide the necessary legal certainty should be introduced by the European Commission, under an accelerated adoption procedure by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, if possible.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Amends Implementing Technical Standards Specifying the Data Collection for the 2025 Benchmarking Exercise
August 9, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published its final draft Implementing Technical Standards amending the Implementing Regulation on the benchmarking of credit risk, market risk, and IFRS9 models for the 2025 exercise. The EU Capital Requirements Directive requires competent authorities to conduct an annual assessment of the quality of internal approaches used for the calculation of own funds requirements. To assist competent authorities in this assessment, the EBA calculates and distributes benchmark values to competent authorities that allows a comparison of individual institutions' risk parameters. These benchmark values are based on data submitted by institutions as laid out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 which specifies the benchmarking portfolios, templates and definitions to be used as part of the annual benchmarking exercises. Proposed changes for the 2025 benchmarking exercise include the expansion to all asset classes of the alternative standardised approach validation portfolios. Only minor changes are proposed in relation to credit risk. The EBA notes that the templates based on the alternative internal model approach have not been implemented because of the postponed implementation of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book in the EU. The EBA has submitted the draft ITS to the European Commission for endorsement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Policy Statement on Leverage Ratio Treatment of Omnibus Account Reserves
July 29, 2024
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement on the leverage ratio treatment of omnibus account reserves and minor amendments to the leverage ratio framework. PRA rules require firms to exclude from the leverage ratio any claims on central banks matched by liabilities in the same currency and of identical or longer maturity. The PRA explains that a new model of reserves holding has emerged where the reserves of several firms are co-mingled in a single account held at the central bank—known as an "omnibus" account. Therefore, the PRA is:- introducing new rules to apply the exclusion consistently across reserves held on omnibus accounts as well as traditionally-held reserves, with the exclusion of the former subject to specific additional conditions; and
- making minor amendments to SS45/15 and the leverage ratio disclosure and reporting instructions to provide clarification about the PRA's expectations and ensure consistency with PRA rules.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Policy Statement on its Approach to Rule Permissions and Waivers
July 25, 2024
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement on its approach to rule permissions and waivers. The policy statement provides feedback to responses the PRA received to CP3/24 published in January. Appendix 1 contains the four responses received to the consultation paper and Appendix 2 contains the PRA's final statement of policy on the same topic. The statement of policy sets out the PRA's approach to the granting of rule permissions under section 138BA of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as inserted by FSMA 2023. The PRA explains that following the responses it received to its consultation it has made two amendments to the statement of policy: (i) what the PRA generally expects to include in a subject specific statement of policy; and (ii) that there may be exceptional circumstances where it may be appropriate to grant a s138BA FSMA permission for which it has not set out criteria despite the s138A FSMA statutory tests not being met. The PRA expects these changes to be beneficial to persons subject to PRA rules by making its policy on s138BA FSMA permissions clearer and more transparent. The statement of policy takes immediate effect on publication of this policy statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Adopts Delegated Regulation Amending EU Capital Requirements Regulation Postponing Application Date of Own Funds Requirement for Market Risk
July 24, 2024
The European Commission has adopted a Delegated Regulation amending the EU Capital Requirements Regulation with regard to the date of application of the own funds requirements for market risk. In addition, alongside the Delegated Regulation, the Commission has published a related Q&A document. Article 461a of the CRR, as amended by CRR III, requires the Commission to monitor the international implementation of the Basel III Fundamental Review of the Trading Book standards across jurisdictions and includes an empowerment to adopt delegated acts to ensure an international level playing field, if there are significant deviations in implementation by third countries.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Progress Report on Enhancing Resilience of Non-Bank Financial Intermediation
July 22, 2024
The Financial Stability Board has published a progress report to the G20 on enhancing the resilience of non-bank financial intermediation. The aim of policies by the FSB to enhance NBFI resilience has been to reduce excessive spikes in the demand for liquidity, enhance the resilience of liquidity supply in stress, and enhance risk monitoring and the preparedness of authorities and market participants. The report sets out the recent and ongoing work by the FSB, in collaboration with standard-setting bodies, to enhance the resilience of the NBFI sector. The FSB notes that the design and implementation of NBFI policies continues to advance, albeit at an uneven pace across jurisdictions. The report includes a table which provides an overview of the FSB's medium-term NBFI work program. The report concludes by outlining further work to assess and address systemic risk in NBFI that the FSB, in collaboration with the standard-setting bodies, will carry out. The work is structured in three main areas: (i) in-depth assessment and ongoing monitoring of vulnerabilities in NBFI; (ii) the development of policies to enhance NBFI resilience; and (iii) the monitoring of the implementation and assessment of the effects of NBFI reforms. The FSB explains that this work will help it to determine whether collectively the reforms have sufficiently addressed systemic risk in NBFI, including whether to develop additional tools for use by authorities.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Finalizes Standards for Banks' Crypto-Asset Exposures
July 17, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Standards has published its final disclosure framework for banks' crypto-asset exposures and targeted amendments to its standard for banks exposures to crypto-assets to tighten the criteria for certain stablecoins to receive a preferential regulatory treatment. The final disclosure framework, which is based on the disclosure requirements in the final prudential standard on banks' crypto-asset exposures, includes a standardized table and templates covering banks' crypto-asset exposures. These require banks to disclose qualitative information on their crypto-asset-related activities and quantitative information on the capital and liquidity requirements for their crypto-asset exposures. The targeted amendments to the crypto-asset prudential standard aim to further promote a consistent understanding of the standard, particularly regarding the criteria for stablecoins to receive a preferential "Group 1b" regulatory treatment. Various other technical amendments clarify other aspects of the standard. Both standards have an implementation date of January 1, 2026.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Report on Bank Digitalization Assessment Criteria
July 11, 2024
The European Central Bank has published a report defining bank digitalization assessment criteria and collection of sound practices. Understanding bank digitalisation and the management of related risks is a key priority of the ECB and the criteria are intended to assess how banks shape, steer and implement their digitalisation strategies, focusing closely on risk identification and mitigation. The criteria and sound practices are grouped into three areas: (i) business model; (ii) governance; and (iii) risk management.
The report also outlines the sound practices the ECB has observed in the digital context. The ECB found that banks demonstrating sound practices assess both the opportunities and risks related to their digital strategy, based on a granular assessment of their business environment. The most advanced digital strategies are those embedded in business or IT strategies, translated into digital initiatives driven by business use cases and technological developments which are then consistently evaluated for efficacy during the execution phase. While most banks have adopted digital solutions to transform their back and front office operations, many have not defined sufficiently granular KPIs, including those assessing the impact of their digital strategies on profit and loss. This means they cannot determine the effectiveness of their strategies and whether they have met their objectives. The ECB states that it will expand the focus of its supervisory work to include reviewing the use of specific technologies more broadly, including the deployment of artificial intelligence and related business use cases.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Consults on Principles for the Sound Management of Third-Party Risk
July 9, 2024
The Basel Committee on Banking Standards has published a consultation on principles for the sound management of third-party risk in the banking sector. The principles address banks' increasing reliance on third-party service providers due to the ongoing digitalization and rapid growth in financial technology, establishing a common baseline for banks and supervisors for the risk management of these arrangements. The consultation consists of 12 high-level principles offering guidance to banks and supervisors on effectively managing and supervising risks from third-party arrangements. The principles introduce the concept of a third-party life cycle and emphasise overarching concepts such as criticality and proportionality. They also address supply chain risk and concentration risk and highlight the importance of supervisory coordination and dialogue across sectors and borders.
While primarily directed at large internationally active banks and their prudential supervisors, the principles also offer benefits to smaller banks and authorities in all jurisdictions. They establish a common baseline for banks and supervisors for the risk management of third parties, while providing the necessary flexibility to accommodate evolving practices and regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions. The deadline for comments is October 9, 2024.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Technical Standards on Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk
July 8, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper on draft regulatory technical standards to specify the conditions and the criteria to assess whether the credit valuation adjustment risk exposures arising from fair-valued securities financing transactions are material, as well as the frequency of that assessment. The draft RTS support the revised framework for the determination of own funds requirements for CVA risk introduced under CRR 3, which provides that firms should include SFTs in the calculation where the SFTs are fair valued and the firm's CVA risk exposures arising from those transactions are material. The concept of materiality set out in the draft RTS will therefore determine whether fair-valued securities financing transactions can be exempted from own funds requirements for CVA risk. The draft RTS included in this consultation paper propose to employ a quantitative approach for the determination of the materiality of such CVA risk exposures. In particular, they propose to perform the assessment on the basis of a ratio that quantifies the amount of CVA risk arising from fair valued SFTs relative to the CVA risk of transactions in scope of the own funds requirements for CVA risk. The draft RTS propose to conduct this assessment on a quarterly basis, to ensure consistency with the regular calculation and reporting cycle of own funds requirements by institutions. Comments may be submitted until October 8, 2024.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Systemic Risk Board Assessment of Implementation of its Recommendation on Guidance for Setting Countercyclical Buffer Rates
July 3, 2024
The European Systemic Risk Board has published a report on its second assessment of implementing actions taken by EU Member State bodies responsible for setting the countercyclical buffer rate, following the ESRB's Recommendation on setting countercyclical buffer rates. The report assesses compliance with the Recommendation, which is addressed to the designated EU Member State bodies, as well as the European Central Bank. The report concludes that the overall level of compliance remains high, with all addressees graded as either fully or largely compliant, and that the deficiencies in compliance identified are not sufficiently material to diminish the efficiency of macro-prudential policies or the single market. The next ESRB follow-up assessment is expected to take place in three years' time, starting from the last reporting deadline.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Adopts Implementing Regulation Amending Implementing Technical Standards on Mapping Credit Assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation
July 1, 2024
The European Commission has adopted the Commission Implementing Regulation amending the Implementing Technical Standards laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1799 as regards the mapping tables specifying the correspondence between the credit risk assessments of external credit assessment institutions and the credit quality steps set out in the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. The mappings need to be updated as: (i) the quantitative and qualitative factors underpinning the credit assessments of some mappings have changed due to the additional quantitative information collected and the qualitative developments registered by some ECAIs; and (ii) some ECAIs have extended their credit assessments to new market segments, resulting in new rating scales and new credit rating types. The Implementing Regulation will enter into force 20 days after it is published in the Official Journal of the European Union.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Extraordinary Circumstances for Continuing the Use of Internal Models for Market Risk
June 28, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published its final draft regulatory technical standards on the conditions and indicators that the EBA shall use to determine whether extraordinary circumstances have occurred for the purposes of Articles 325az(5) and 325bf(6) of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. Under the CRR, national regulators may permit institutions to soften or waive the application of certain requirements for the use of internal models in accordance with the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, under extraordinary circumstances. The draft RTS establish a high-level framework for identifying the occurrence of extraordinary circumstances, setting out conditions that need to be met and indicators that could support the identification of extraordinary circumstances. More specifically, they set out that only a situation of cross-border financial market stress, or a regime shift, can qualify as a situation of extraordinary circumstances, and only subject to the additional condition that this stress or regime shift impacts the validity or suitability of the results of the back-testing or the profit and loss attribution test. The draft RTS will be submitted to the European Commission for endorsement following which they will be subject to scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union before being published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The draft RTS will apply from 20 days after their entry into force.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK June Financial Stability Report Published
June 27, 2024
The U.K. Financial Policy Committee has published the financial policy summary and record of the FPC meeting on June 11, 2024, as well as its June financial stability report. The FPC considers the overall risk environment to be broadly unchanged from Q1. Markets continue to price mostly for a benign central case outlook, and some risk premia have tightened even further, despite the global risk environment facing several challenges. Some of these challenges have become more concerning and proximate.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Updates on Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities Instruments
June 27, 2024
The European Banking Authority has published an updated report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1, Tier 2 and total loss absorbing capacity as well as the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities instruments of EU institutions. The update provides new guidance on the prudential valuation of non-CET1 instruments and on other aspects related to the terms and conditions of the issuances. The report builds upon the 2023 update with substantial amendments made.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Pillar 3 Disclosure Framework under Third Capital Requirements Regulation
June 21, 2024
The European Banking Authority has finalized its draft implementing technical standards on public disclosures by institutions that implement the changes in the Pillar 3 disclosure framework introduced by the third Capital Requirements Regulation, which stem from the latest Basel III reforms. The ITS implement the CRR III prudential disclosure requirements by including new requirements on output floor, credit risk, market risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, and a transitional disclosure on exposures to crypto-assets. In addition, they aim to provide institutions with a comprehensive, integrated set of uniform disclosure formats. The ITS repeal the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 on public disclosures, with a view to enabling the EBA to comply with its mandate to develop IT solutions, making the technical standards more user-friendly for institutions. Later in 2024, the EBA will complement these ITS with the CRR III disclosure requirements that are not directly linked to Basel III implementation, in particular the extension of the disclosure requirements on environmental, social and governance risks to all institutions in accordance with the proportionality principle, and new disclosure requirements on shadow banking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards for Assessing the Materiality of Extensions and Changes to New Market Risk Internal Models
June 20, 2024
The European Banking Authority has finalized its draft regulatory technical standards on the conditions for assessing the materiality of model extensions and changes to the use of alternative internal models and changes to the subset of the modellable risk factors referred to in Article 325bc under Article 325az(8)(a) of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. The final draft RTS differentiate between material extensions and changes under the internal models approach, to be approved by national regulators, and non-material extensions and changes, to be notified to national regulators four weeks in advance. This last category is further divided into two subcategories: extensions and changes notified with additional information, and extensions and changes with basic information. For the categorization of extensions and changes to the relevant categories and subcategories, the final draft RTS set out a combination of qualitative and quantitative conditions. In particular, the quantitative conditions aim at assessing the effect of the extension or change on the IMA own funds requirements and on the relevant components of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book IMA, before and after the planned extension or change. The final draft RTS also include guiding principles that institutions should follow in the categorization process, provisions on the implementation of extensions and changes, and documentation requirements. With the submission of these final draft RTS to the Commission for endorsement, the EBA completes its roadmap on market and counterparty credit risk approaches published on June 27, 2019.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Third Capital Requirements Regulation and Sixth Capital Requirements Directive Published
June 19, 2024
The EU has published the final legislation implementing revisions to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive (commonly referred to as the EU banking package) in the Official Journal of the European Union, namely:- a Regulation amending the EU Capital Requirements Regulation regarding requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk, and the output floor ((EU) 2024/1623) (CRR III). The Regulation enters into force on July 9, 2024, 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. CRR III will apply from January 1, 2025, with the exception of certain specified points of Article 1, which will apply from July 9, 2024; and
- a Directive amending the EU Capital Requirements Directive regarding supervisory powers, sanctions, third-country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks ((EU) 2024/1619) (CRD VI). The Directive enters into force on July 9, 2024, 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Member states are required to adopt and publish the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with CRD VI by January 10, 2026, and to apply those measures from January 11, 2026, with the exception of Article 1(9) and (13), which shall apply from January 11, 2027. A further exception provides for measures necessary to comply with the amendments set out in Article 1(13) regarding Article 48k and 48l of CRD, which shall apply from January 11, 2026, and Article 1(9) regarding Article 21c(5) of CRD, which shall apply from July 11, 2026.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Announces Delay to Basel Fundamental Review of the Trading Book Market Risk Reforms
June 18, 2024
Mairead McGuinness, European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and Capital Markets Union, made a speech discussing the importance of continuing to make progress on the Banking Union and CMU. Topics on the Commission's agenda to continue development include analyzing the EU securitization market. The European Commission will launch a public consultation in the autumn on how to make the market more attractive to issuers and investors. Ms. McGuinness also announces a delay to the date of application of the Basel Comittee on Banking Supervision's Fundamental Review of the Trading Book market risk reforms by one year, until January 1, 2026. Ms. McGuinness explains that it is now clear there will be a delay in the U.S. in implementing the reforms and therefore a delay in the EU is necessary to ensure a global level playing field. The delay will be adopted by way of a delegated act, which will take a minimum of three months.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delegated Regulation Published Supplementing EU Capital Requirements Regulation on Identifying Groups of Connected Clients
June 18, 2024
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1728 has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, supplementing the EU Capital Requirements Regulation with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying in which circumstances the conditions for identifying groups of connected clients are met. The definition of a group of connected clients in the CRR makes it possible to identify two or more natural or legal persons who are so closely linked by idiosyncratic risk factors that it is prudent to treat them as a single risk. Consequently, the purpose of the RTS is to set out clear circumstances where interconnections between clients by means of a control relationship and/or an economic dependency relationship lead to a single risk and thus a requirement to group those clients. The Delegated Regulation enters into force on July 8, 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delegated Regulation Published Supplementing EU Capital Requirements Regulation on Assessments of Internal Models for Market Risk
June 17, 2024
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1085 has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, supplementing the EU Capital RequirementsRegulation with regard to regulatory technical standards on the assessment methodology under which national regulators verify an institution's compliance with the requirements to use internal models for market risk. The RTS identify all elements that are to be assessed by the national regulator when granting the approval to use an internal model approach to compute the own funds requirements for market risk. They are constituted by three main chapters: (i) assessment of qualitative requirements; (ii) assessment of the internal risk-measurement model used to compute the expected shortfall measure and the stress scenario risk measure; and (iii) assessment of the internal default risk model used to compute the additional own funds requirement for default risk. The Delegated Regulation enters into force on July 7, 2024, 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, with the exception of Article 18(1)(a), regarding the environmental risk, Article 18(1)(c)(vii) and Article 18(2)(b)(v), which will apply from January 1, 2025; and Article 21(1)(b), which will apply from January 1, 2026.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Amends Disclosures and Reporting on MREL and TLAC
June 7, 2024
Commission Implementing Regulation 2024/1618 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/763, laying down implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting and public disclosure of MREL and TLAC, has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amending ITS were created in response to changes to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation as well as to clarify requirements in response to the Single Rulebook Q&A process. In particular, the amending ITS adjust the templates and reporting instructions to reflect: (i) the requirement to deduct investments in eligible liabilities instruments of entities belonging to the same resolution group ("daisy chain" framework); (ii) the prior permission regime for buying back eligible liabilities instruments issued by the reporting entities and groups; and (iii) other minor updates to the ITS and the accompanying technical package to address some identified issues. The amending ITS will enter into force on June 27, 2024, and will apply from December 27, 2024. -
EU Consultation on Draft Technical Standards for Operational Risk Loss under Third Capital Requirements Regulation
June 6, 2024
The European Banking Authority has opened a consultation on a package of draft regulatory technical standards that aim to standardize the collection and the record of operational risk losses and to provide clarity on the exemptions for the calculation of the annual operational risk loss and on the adjustments to the loss data set that banks must perform in case of merged or acquired entities or activities. The package consists of:- Draft RTS on establishing a risk taxonomy on operational risk, which provide a list of operational risk event types, categories, and attributes that institutions must use when recording operational risk loss events in line with the current framework and the international standards.
- Draft RTS on the conditions under which it would be unduly burdensome for an institution to calculate the annual operational risk loss. In such cases, the draft RTS allow for a temporary waiver from the requirement to calculate the annual operational risk loss.
- Draft RTS on the adjustments to an institution's loss data set following the inclusion of losses from merged or acquired entities or activities, which provide indications on the currency and the risk taxonomy to be used when incorporating the loss data set of merged entities or activities.
The deadline for comments is September 6, 2024. The EBA intends to finalize the draft RTS by the end of 2024. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Delays Publication of Second Resolvability Assessment Due to General Election
June 6, 2024
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a modification by consent of Rule 4.1 of the Resolution Assessment Part of the PRA Rulebook. The PRA explains that, as with previous general elections, it will be following the Cabinet Office's election guidance, which includes limiting communications activities until after the election. In line with this approach, the Bank of England and PRA have chosen to delay publication of the second Resolvability Assessment Framework assessment of the major U.K. banks to early August. The publication of the BoE's assessment was due by June 14, 2024, alongside firms' own public disclosures (as required by Rule 4.1 of the Resolution Assessment Part of the PRA Rulebook). As such, the PRA is offering a modification by consent to delay the deadline for firms to publish their RAF disclosures from the second Friday in June, to the second Friday in August at the latest. Each firm that wishes to take advantage of this modification should consider the terms of the direction. -
EU Discussion Paper on Investment Firms' Prudential Framework
June 3, 2024
The European Banking Authority and European Securities and Markets Authority have published a joint discussion paper on the potential review of the investment firms' prudential framework. The discussion paper aims at gathering early stakeholder feedback to inform the response to the European Commission's call for advice.
The EBA notes that it is of the overall opinion that the current framework reaches the original general objectives, providing a robust and risk-sensitive prudential framework tailored to the size, activities and complexity of investment firms regulated under the Markets in Financial Instruments package. Nonetheless, it notes that market participants and supervisors highlighted a number of issues or areas of potential improvements of the prudential framework that may lead to changes to either the Investment Firm Regulation and Investment Firm Directive or to the related delegated regulations.
Among other things, the discussion paper considers: (i) the implications of the adoption of the new EU Banking package (known as CRD VI and CRR III) concerning the trading book, the fundamental review of the trading book and credit valuation adjustments; (ii) prudential consolidation and a possible extension to crowdfunding and crypto-asset service providers; (iii) aspects related to compensation, including the scope of application, compensation policies, the requirements on variable remuneration, and their oversight, disclosure, and transparency; (iv) the treatment of firms currently non-prudentially regulated and active in commodity markets; (v) the categorization of investment firms; and (vi) reviewing the existing K‐factors to cover risks currently only addressed under the Pillar 2 framework or as possible alternatives to existing K-factors.
The deadline for comments is September 3, 2024. The EBA and ESMA plan to publish a final report by December 2024. -
European Central Bank Consults on Draft Guide on Outsourcing Cloud Services
June 3, 2024
The European Central Bank has opened a consultation on a draft guide on outsourcing cloud services to cloud service providers. The guide aims to clarify both the ECB's understanding of related legal requirements, including those under the EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act and the Capital Requirement Directive, and its expectations for the banks it supervises. The guide sets out detailed supervisory expectations, drawing on risks and best practices observed in the context of ongoing supervision and dedicated on-site inspections. It covers topics including: (i) the governance of cloud services; (ii) the availability and resilience of cloud services; (iii) ICT security, data confidentiality and integrity; (iv) exit strategy and termination rights; and (v) oversight monitoring and internal audits. The deadline for comments is July 15, 2024. -
Amendments Proposed to Global Standard for Banks’ Exposures to Crypto-Assets
01/25/2024
Following publication of the final bank prudential requirements for exposures to crypto-assets, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is consulting on proposed amendments to the requirements for exposures to stablecoins. The consultation closes on March 28, 2024. The Basel Committee does not state whether these proposals, if they proceed, would need to be implemented by January 1, 2025, which is the implementation date for the final standard for banks' exposures to crypto-assets.
The Basel Committee's final requirements for exposures to crypto-assets apply different prudential approaches depending on whether a crypto-asset meets certain conditions. Crypto-assets that meet all of the conditions are referred to as "Group 1 crypto-assets" and, within that group, stablecoins fall within Group 1b. The Basel Committee is proposing changes to the requirements that determine whether a bank can include a stablecoin exposure in the Group 1b category. First, the Committee is proposing changes to the composition of reserve assets of stablecoins that will enhance the asset quality criteria for reserve assets under the redemption risk test and provide additional safeguards for reserve assets. Secondly, the Committee proposes that banks should be required to perform due diligence, at the point of acquisition and regularly thereafter, that provides the bank with an adequate understanding of the stabilization mechanism and its effectiveness. Statistical tests will be required as part of the due diligence. A regulator would be capable of overriding a bank's categorization of its exposure on the basis of those test results.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Fourth Commencement Regulations Under Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 Published
01/18/2024
The Fourth Commencement Regulations - the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 - under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 were made on December 14, 2023.
Read more. -
UK Extends Transitional Period for Third-Country Benchmarks
01/08/2024
The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Benchmarks and Capital Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 were enacted on December 19, 2023. The Regulations amend two pieces of legislation that are set to be repealed by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023, both of which are subject to a transitional period until that repeal takes place. HM Treasury is able to amend the legislation during the transitional period to ensure that it remains up to date.
The Regulations amend the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation to reintroduce the inadvertently removed "discount factor" that reduces the amount of capital that small- and medium-sized firms must hold for their trading and derivative activities. The amendment took effect on December 20, 2023. This move is in line with the approach of other leading jurisdictions and aligns with the government's policy to enhance the competitiveness of the U.K. markets. It also accords with the Prudential Regulation Authority's introduction of a simpler prudential regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers.
The Regulations also amend the U.K. Benchmarks Regulation to extend the transitional period for third-country benchmarks from the end of 2025 to the end of 2030. This change is in line with HM Treasury’s policy announced in November 2023. The extension took effect on January 1, 2024. -
UK Statutory Instrument Made to Ensure Legislation Remains Consistent with Latest Repeals
01/08/2024
The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2023 make consequential amendments to various pieces of legislation arising from the repeal by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 of certain retained EU financial services laws. The Regulations took effect on January 1, 2024. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Commencement No. 1) Regulations 2023 provided for the repeal of 98 statutory instruments on August 29, 2023, and further revocations from January 1, 2024, including the European Long-Term Investment Funds Regulation (and related SI and tertiary legislation) and a provision from the Capital Requirements Regulation so as to allow the Bank of England more flexibility to set internal Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities for U.K. subsidiaries of non-U.K. global systemically important banks. These latest Regulations make consequential amendments to ensure that legislation remains consistent with the January 2024 repeals.
Consequential amendments are also made to account for the removal of the double volume cap from the U.K.'s Markets in Financial Instruments regime. The DVC limited the level of dark trading to a certain proportion of total trading in an equity. Instead, the Financial Conduct Authority must monitor trading and has new powers to direct that transparency waivers should be suspended if the ongoing use of the waiver would impact market integrity. In addition, consequential amendments are made following the Electronic Money, Payment Card Interchange Fee and Payment Services (Amendment) Regulations 2023 which amended payments-related REUL. -
Bank of England Publishes Policy Statement on Implementation of Basel 3.1 Standards
01/03/2024
The Bank of England has published a Policy Statement on the Implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards in the U.K., taking account of responses to its Consultation Paper 16/22 published in November 2022. The Basel 3.1 changes introduce the as yet unimplemented Basel reforms to banks' regulatory capital frameworks, intended to restore credibility in the calculation of risk-weighted assets and improve the comparability of banks' capital ratios.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator's Rules for Small Banks Coming at Start of 2024
12/22/2023
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement and rules for implementing the Strong and Simple Framework. The framework is intended to simplify the prudential regulation of non-systemic banks and building societies that are not internationally active, reducing costs for firms, but maintaining their resilience. Up until now, the regulatory approach has broadly applied the same requirements to all banks and building societies, irrespective of their size and activities. Certain prudential rules are simplified for smaller banks and building societies, but to a lesser extent than in some other jurisdictions.
The policy statement sets out the scope criteria, liquidity and disclosure requirements, and confirms certain timings. The PRA has decided to rename Simpler-regime Firms to Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), and Simpler-regime consolidation entities to SDDT consolidation entities. The rules providing for eligible firms to become SDDTs, definitions and disclosure requirements take effect on January 1, 2024. The other rules covered by the policy statement will apply from July 1, 2024. The PRA will consult in Q2 2024 on amending the Pillar 2 and buffer requirements for SDDTs.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Sets Out Expectations for Banks Innovating in Digital Money
11/27/2023
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Dear CEO letter, addressed to CEOs of banks, setting out its expectations of banks (deposit-takers) regarding the risks that arise from innovations in digital money and money-like instruments available to retail customers. The letter focuses on innovations in the use of deposits (and tokenized deposits), e-money and regulated stablecoins used for payment (which are being brought into the regulatory perimeter).
The PRA sets out how banks are expected to limit contagion arising from confusion regarding the different protections available to retail holders of bank deposits, e-money and regulated stablecoins. Where a bank or its group want to issue e-money or regulated stablecoins, that activity should be carried out from an insolvency-remote entity that is separate to the bank, with different branding from the bank to ensure that any failure of the e-money or stablecoin issuer would not impact the bank and the continuity of its deposit-taking services. The PRA also expects any tokenized deposit-taking to be undertaken in a way that ensures protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. An e-money or stablecoin issuer that decides to accept traditional deposits would first need to establish a separate entity to obtain permission to operate as a bank.
Read more. -
Basel Committee Report on 2023 Banking Turmoil
10/20/2023
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a press release in early October in which it announced:- That it would consult on disclosure frameworks for climate-related financial risks (in November 2023) and banks' cryptoasset exposures (soon).
- The publication of its report on the banking turmoil of 2023, which assesses the causes of the turmoil, the regulatory and supervisory responses, and the initial lessons learnt. The Basel Committee states that it will be undertaking some follow-up work, including prioritizing work to bolster supervisory effectiveness globally and assessing whether any aspects of the Basel Framework did not function as intended during the turmoil.
- That by mid-2024 it would publish a report on developments in the digitalisation of finance and their implications for banks and supervisors.
-
UK Regulatory Gateway for Financial Promotions Applies from February 2024
08/29/2023
The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Commencement No. 2 and Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2023, made on August 22, 2023, bring into force certain provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 and create a number of transitional regimes. We discuss the FSM Act in our client note, "A Boost for U.K. Financial Services: The U.K. Financial Services and Markets Act 2023."
Read more. -
Final Global Prudential Requirements for Banks' Exposures to Crypto-Assets
12/16/2022
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published its final bank prudential requirements for exposures to crypto-assets. The Basel Committee consulted on these requirements in 2021 and 2022 and has now set the minimum standards based on the principle of "same risk, same activity, same treatment." These standards will be implemented by January 1, 2025. The Basel Committee has maintained the different prudential approaches depending on whether a crypto-asset meets certain conditions. Crypto-assets that meet all of the conditions are referred to as "Group 1 crypto-assets" and are generally tokenized crypto-assets and stablecoins. Group 2 crypto-assets are all other crypto-assets, which are deemed to present additional and higher risks than Group 1 crypto-assets. The capital requirements for Group 1 crypto-assets will be based on the risk weights for exposures under the existing Basel framework. Exposures to Group 2 crypto-assets will attract a higher capital charge.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults Further on Capital Requirements for Banks' Exposures to Crypto-Assets
06/30/2022
Following its consultation last year, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has launched a second consultation on bank prudential requirements for exposures to crypto-assets. The first consultation set out a preliminary proposal for the prudential treatment of crypto-assets, based on feedback to the 2019 discussion paper and other input from stakeholders. This second consultation proposes revisions to the initial proposals based on the feedback received and sets out proposed minimum standards based on the principle of "same risk, same activity, same treatment". Responses to the consultation may be submitted until September 30, 2022. The Basel Committee intends to publish final standards before the year-end; standards may be stricter than those presented in this consultation if feedback indicates any deficiencies.
The Basel Committee is maintaining its approach of adopting different prudential treatments depending on whether a crypto-asset meets certain conditions. Crypto-assets that meet all of the conditions are referred to as Group 1 crypto-assets and will be subject to the existing Basel framework. Group 2 crypto-assets are those that do not meet the conditions and are therefore deemed to present additional and higher risks than Group 1 crypto-assets. Group 2 crypto-assets will be subject to an adapted prudential regime, with netting and a 100% capital charge. Group 1 and Group 2 crypto-assets could be tokenized crypto-assets and stablecoins; Group 2 could also include unbacked crypto-assets.
Read more. -
UK Treasury Committee Makes Recommendation for Future Regulatory Framework Review
06/16/2022
The House of Commons Treasury Committee has published a report on the Future of Financial Services Regulation setting out its view on the priorities for regulatory change in the U.K. now that the U.K. has left the EU. The report considers some of HM Treasury's proposals in the Future Regulatory Framework Review and presents its related recommendations. It also makes specific recommendations for the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report on Non-Bank Lending Sector
05/04/2022
The European Banking Authority has published a report on the EU non-bank lending sector i.e., the growing number of financial intermediaries operating outside the EU financial services regulatory perimeter, including BigTech firms (e..g, Meta, Amazon and Google) and FinTech firms, which develop innovative technology for financial services.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Discussion Paper on Role of Environmental Risks in the Prudential Framework
05/02/2022
The European Banking Authority has published a discussion paper on whether, and how, environmental risks should be incorporated into the EU prudential frameworks for EU credit institutions and investment firms. The feedback received will help the EBA to determine (in accordance with its mandates under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation and EU Investment Firm Regulation) whether the EU should introduce specific prudential treatment for certain exposures and assets that are substantially linked to environmental and/or social objectives and impacts. Responses should be submitted by August 2, 2022.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Proposes Definition of "Simpler-Regime" Firm
04/29/2022
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has opened a consultation in which it proposes introducing a definition of a "Simpler-regime Firm". This is the PRA's first step in developing a strong and simple prudential framework for non-systemic banks and building societies that are not internationally active following the 2021 discussion paper and feedback paper. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until July 22, 2022. The PRA wants to create a graduated framework for U.K. prudential supervision with simpler rules applying to the smallest firms. The applicable rules would increase in sophistication as the size and complexity of firms increased.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Potential Digital Euro
04/05/2022
The European Commission has launched a targeted consultation on a possible digital euro. The EU is considering introducing a digital euro for retail payments, which would be available alongside cash. A decision has not yet been made. The European Central Bank, responsible for the design and implementation of the digital euro, launched a project in July 2021 to get ready for the potential issuance of a digital euro. The introduction of a digital euro would require an EU regulation based on a proposal by the European Commission and agreed through the co-legislative process. Legislative changes would also be needed for existing legislation (e.g., under the revised Payment Services Directive). Central banks from non-euro area Member States also envisage issuing digital currencies.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Prudential Disclosures of ESG Risks
01/24/2022
The European Banking Authority has published final draft Implementing Technical Standards on Pillar 3 prudential disclosures of environmental, social and governance risks under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. The ITS specify the type and format of information to be published in accordance with the new CRR requirements on disclosure of prudential information on ESG risks.
Read more. -
Feedback Published on Initial UK Discussion Paper 'Strong and Simple' Prudential Framework
12/15/2021
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a feedback statement to the discussion paper published earlier this year in which it proposed introducing a "strong and simple" prudential framework for non-systemic banks and building societies that are not internationally active. The discussion paper concerned the possibility of introducing a graduated framework for U.K. prudential supervision with simple rules applying to the smallest firms. The applicable rules would increase in sophistication as the size and complexity of firms increased. The PRA discussed the possible approaches to identifying firms that would be in scope of the first threshold by looking at, for example, their activities, cross-border business and risk exposures. The introduction of such a framework would represent a major policy change for the U.K.
The feedback statement summarizes the responses to the discussion paper and sets out broad themes emerging. Overall, respondents were supportive of the idea to introduce a strong and simple framework, although concerns were expressed about the number of layers that the framework would involve. The PRA would welcome any comments on the feedback statement. Further consultations on the potential framework will follow in 2022 and/or 2023.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
HM Treasury Identifies Areas for Improving the UK Securitization Framework
12/13/2021
Following its call for evidence earlier this year, HM Treasury has published its report on the review of the U.K. Securitization Regulation. HM Treasury was required to conduct a review of the functioning of the Regulation and report to Parliament on its findings by January 2022. The Securitization Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as "simple, transparent and standardized" (STS) securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. Related provisions under the Capital Requirements Regulation set out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
Read more. -
EU Publishes Proposed Banking Package 2021
10/27/2021
The European Commission has published three legislative proposals to amend the EU Capital Requirements Regulation and the EU Capital Requirements Directive, referred to as the Banking Package 2021. The proposals are subject to consultation, responses to which may be submitted until January 14, 2022.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Publish Final Report on Expanded Disclosures under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
10/22/2021
The European Supervisory Authorities (the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) have published a new final report and draft Regulatory Technical Standards on disclosures to be made under the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. The EU SFDR was published in December 2019 and the majority of its provisions have applied since March 10, 2021.
Read more. -
European Commission Publishes Study on Banks’ and Prudential Supervisors’ Integration of ESG Factors
09/27/2021
The European Commission has published a study on EU banks’ integration of environmental, social and governance factors into their risk management processes, business strategies and investment policies. The study finds that, although banks have made efforts to pursue ESG agendas, the speed and degree of integration of ESG considerations must accelerate. In addition, it finds that prudential supervisors could take more action to integrate ESG factors into their supervision of banks. Further details of the challenges facing banks and supervisors in ESG integration are set out in the study.
Read more. -
HM Treasury Publishes Amendments to UK Capital Requirements Regulation
09/23/2021
HM Treasury has made certain amendments under the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation (Amendment) Regulations 2021 to the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation. The UK CRR is the U.K. version of the corresponding EU regulation, as applicable after Brexit. The new regulations introduce some new provisions and revoke certain others. The related explanatory memorandum describes the changes in further detail. The changes will come into force on January 1, 2022.
Read more. -
European Commission Consultation on Improving the EU Secondary Markets for Markets for Non-Performing Loans
07/16/2021
The European Commission is consulting on improving transparency and efficiency in the EU secondary markets for non-performing loans. The objective is to provide a more liquid market by improving the quantity, quality and comparability of NPL data. The consultation was announced in December 2020 as part of the Commission’s Strategy for post-Covid-19 NPLs. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until September 8, 2021.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Government Opens Review of Securitization Regulation
06/24/2021
HM Treasury has opened a Review of the U.K. Securitization Regulation with the issue of a call for evidence. The Review is required under the Regulation, and HM Treasury must report to Parliament on its findings by January 2022. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until September 2, 2021. HM Treasury also asks respondents to consider whether any changes are needed that are time-sensitive so that consideration can be given to whether a change is implemented through legislation or regulator rules. In the context of the Future Regulatory Framework Review, the responsibility for making and implementing rules will be transferred to the regulators. The FRF Review is ongoing, with a second consultation expected later this year.
The Securitization Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as "simple, transparent and standardized" (STS) securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. Related provisions under the Capital Requirements Regulation set out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
Read more. -
UK Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform Publishes Recommendations
06/16/2021
The Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform has published its report, making several recommendations for reforming the U.K.'s approach to regulation as well as practical suggestions for implementing the reforms. The main recommendation tasks the government with building a U.K. regulatory framework that has proportionality at its core and that is based on the principles of the common law. The report also provides specific proposals for regulatory reforms across several sectors, identified as high growth sectors, including the financial services sector. The TIGRR recommendations will be progressed by the newly established Brexit Opportunities Unit, which is being led by Lord Frost, Minister of State at the Cabinet Office. Consultations on proposals to implement these ambitious recommendations are expected later this year.
The TIGRR report recommends the approach to regulation is reformed along traditional common law lines, moving away from the EU codified system. The report suggests that the government reconsiders the approach to regulation with the aim of enhancing productivity, encouraging competition and invigorating innovation.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Proposes Capital Requirements for Banks' Exposures to Crypto-Assets
06/10/2021
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has launched a consultation on bank prudential requirements for exposures to crypto-assets. The consultation follows the Basel Committee's 2019 discussion paper on the prudential treatment of crypto-assets. This latest consultation sets out a preliminary proposal for the prudential treatment of crypto-assets, based on feedback to the discussion paper and other input from stakeholders. The Basel Committee believes that setting the policy will be an iterative process and that a further consultation will be needed. Responses to this consultation may be submitted until September 10, 2021.
The Basel Committee considers that the increasing growth of crypto-assets raises financial stability concerns and is increasing the risks encountered by banks. Certain crypto-assets are highly volatile and may pose risks for banks as exposures increase, including liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, operational risk, money laundering/terrorist financing risk, and legal and reputation risks.
Read more. -
UK Discussion Paper on Systemic Stablecoins Published
06/07/2021
The Bank of England has published a discussion paper on new forms of digital money that are potentially systemically important, focusing on systemic stablecoins. HM Treasury recently consulted on bringing certain crypto-assets into the U.K. regulatory perimeter and proposed that the BoE would regulate systemic stablecoins (under the Banking Act 2009) and that the Financial Conduct Authority would be responsible for consumer protection and conduct regulation. Feedback to the discussion paper can be submitted until September 7, 2021. The feedback will inform the BoE's next steps and it will consult on a specific regulatory framework for stablecoins, pending the finalization of the anticipated legislation.
According to the BoE, systemic stablecoins would be those that have the potential to scale up and grow rapidly and become widely used for payments by individuals and non-financial businesses. Non-systemic stablecoins would be those that are not widely used for payments and would not be subject to regulation by the BoE. Systemic stablecoins would be: (i) denominated in sterling; (ii) backed by assets that make them stable in value, unlike crypto-assets that have no safeguard, such as Bitcoin; and (iii) would not be created by lending to the real economy, unlike commercial bank money.
Read more. -
European Securities and Markets Authority Issues Call for Evidence on Digital Finance
05/25/2021
Following the publication by the Commission of its Digital Finance Strategy in September 2020, the Commission has asked the European Supervisory Authorities for technical advice on the regulatory and supervisory challenges of three areas, namely the growing fragmentation of value chains in finance, digital platforms and bundling of various financial services, and groups combining financial and non-financial activities.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on "Strong and Simple" Prudential Framework for Small Banks
04/29/2021
In what would be a significant policy change, the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a discussion paper in which it proposes introducing a "strong and simple" prudential framework for non-systemic banks and building societies that are not internationally active. The aim is to simplify the prudential regulation of these firms, reducing costs for firms, but to maintain their resilience. The consultation closes on July 9, 2021, and will be followed by a consultation with proposals.
The existing regulatory approach broadly applies the same requirements to all banks and building societies, irrespective of their size and activities. Certain prudential rules are simplified for smaller banks and building societies, but to a lesser extent than in some other jurisdictions. The PRA notes that a graduated framework may take years to implement. Therefore, it is starting with the smallest firms and will consider how it might be built out for larger, non-systemic U.K. domestic firms. The plans follow the principles of the Basel Standards and consider how other jurisdictions have implemented similar regimes, such as Australia, Canada and the U.S.
The discussion paper sets out what the simpler regime might look like, including:- the possible approaches to identifying firms that will be in scope by looking at, for example, their activities, cross-border business and risk exposures;
- the possible requirements under the regime; and
- ways in which firms might transition in and out of the regime, such as by using an intermediate stage or PRA waivers.
View the PRA's discussion paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Services Act 2021 Published
04/29/2021
The U.K. Financial Services Bill has received Royal Assent from Her Majesty the Queen and has become an Act of Parliament, the Financial Services Act 2021. Some provisions of the Act came into force on the date of Royal Assent, with a limited number following on June 29, 2021. The majority of the Act will come into force on a date specified in regulations yet to be made by HM Treasury.
Read more. -
UK Regulators Publish Dear CEO Letter for Banks and Building Societies on Deposit Aggregators
04/14/2021
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority have published a joint Dear CEO letter addressed to CEOs of U.K. banks and building societies on the risks of accepting deposits from deposit aggregators.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Publishes Guide to Pecuniary Penalties for Prudential Regulatory Breaches
03/02/2021
The European Central Bank Banking Supervision division has published a guide to its method for setting pecuniary penalties for breaches of prudential regulatory requirements by Eurozone banks that are directly prudentially supervised by the ECB. The ECB will adopt a two-stage approach, first determining the base amount, and then deciding whether to adjust that amount by reference to a range of factors.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Draft Regulatory Technical Standards Under EU Capital Requirements Regulation
03/01/2021
The European Banking Authority has published draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the revised EU Capital Requirements Regulation, designed to harmonize the methodology for calculating certain technical elements of the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk across the EU.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Identifies Error in "Higher Paid Material Risk Taker" Definition
02/25/2021
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has identified an error in the definition of "Higher Paid Material Risk Taker" within Rule 1.3 of the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook, implementing part of the EU's Fifth Capital Requirements Directive in U.K. laws before the end of the Brexit transitional period. The definition currently requires an individual to be treated as a Higher Paid Material Risk Taker when: (a) their annual variable remuneration exceeds 33% of their total remuneration; and (b) their total remuneration exceeds £500,000. Instead, an individual should be treated as a Higher Paid Material Risk Taker when either condition (a) or (b) are satisfied.
Read more. -
Bank of England Publishes Dear CEO Letter on Resolvability Assessment Framework
02/24/2021
The Bank of England has published a Dear CEO letter addressed to the CEOs of eight major U.K. banks, emphasizing the importance of the BoE's Resolvability Assessment Framework and the BoE's expectation that banks will take responsibility for their resolvability. The eight banks are in scope of the first RAF reporting and disclosure cycle.
Read more. -
EU Final Draft Technical Standards on the Determination of Indirect Exposures Published
02/19/2021
Following its consultation last year, the European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the determination of indirect exposures to underlying clients of derivative and credit derivative contracts. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation, as amended by CRR 2, requires firms to add to the total exposures to a client the exposures arising from derivative contracts listed in Annex II of the CRR and credit derivative contracts, where the contract was not directly entered into with that client but the underlying debt or equity instrument was issued by that client. The final draft RTS will form part of the EU's large exposures framework. The final draft RTS include a methodology for the calculation of indirect exposures for different classes of derivative contracts and credit derivative contracts with a single underlying debt or equity instrument and a methodology for calculating exposures arising from contracts with multiple underlying reference names.
The final draft RTS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
View the final report and final draft RTS on the determination of indirect exposures.
View details of CRR 2.
View details of the EBA's consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft EU Technical Standards on Disclosures of Indicators of Global Systemic Importance Published
02/18/2021
The European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the disclosure of indicators of global systemic importance by Global Systemically Important Institutions. The EU Capital Requirements regulation requires G-SIIs to disclose annually the values of the indicators used for determining their score in accordance with a set identification methodology. The final draft ITS set out the uniform disclosure formats and associated instructions for the disclosures to be made. The provisions of these final draft ITS will be incorporated into the existing comprehensive ITS on firms' public disclosures and, to facilitate comparability. The format has been aligned with the format set out in the Basel III standards - the "Disclosure of G‐SIB indicators".
The final draft ITS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
View the EBA's final report and final draft ITS on G-SII disclosures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Government Publishes Proposals for Investment Firm Prudential Regime and Implementation of Outstanding Basel III Requirements
02/04/2021
The U.K. Government has opened a consultation on the implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime and the remaining Basel III Standards in the U.K. The Financial Services Bill, once it is finalized, will introduce powers for the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority to introduce the IFPR and outstanding Basel III prudential requirements for banks. The FCA has already launched a consultation on some aspects of the IFPR and will consult on the others throughout the year. The PRA is expected to consult on implementation of Basel III in Q1 2021. HM Treasury's consultation concerns those aspects of the two regimes that will require secondary legislation under the Financial Services Bill. The consultation closes on April 1, 2021.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Technical Amendments to Rules on Haircuts for Securities Financing Transactions
01/26/2021
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has launched a consultation on two proposed technical amendments to the Basel II Framework rules on minimum haircut floors for securities financing transactions. The proposals aim to address an interpretative issue relating to collateral upgrade transactions and correct a misstatement of the formula used to calculate haircut floors for netting sets of SFTs. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until March 31, 2021.
View the consultation paper.
View details of the FSB's delay to the framework for minimum haircuts for uncleared SFTs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on its Approach to Supervising International Banks
01/11/2021
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on its proposed approach to supervising international banks. The proposals cover the U.K. activities of PRA-authorized banks and designated investment firms that are headquartered outside of the U.K. or are part of a group based outside of the U.K., including those firms operating in the U.K. through a branch. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until April 11, 2021. Implementation of the final policy is expected to occur in Q2 2021, except for those EEA firms that are in the Temporary Permissions Regime which are expected to meet the expectations "as soon as reasonably practicable" and at least by the time the firm is authorized and exits the TPR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Final Rules on Implementation of CRD V
12/28/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published its final Policy Statement setting out the final rules for implementing CRD V in the U.K. The Policy Statement confirms the final rules set out in the PRA's near-final Policy Statement, published on December 9, 2020. The Policy Statement also confirms the PRA's proposed approach to enforcing compliance with consolidated prudential requirements for U.K. banking consolidation groups, as proposed in the PRA's consultation paper published on December 9, 2020. The Supervisory Statements and Statements of Policy attached to the Policy Statement should be read together with the PRA's Supervisory Statement, "Non-binding PRA materials: The PRA's approach after the UK's withdrawal from the EU", for guidance on how to interpret the materials after the end of the transition period.
Read more. -
UK Regulator Publishes Proposals for New Investment Firm Prudential Regime
12/14/2020
Following the discussion paper published earlier this year, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has launched its first consultation on the new U.K. Investment Firms Prudential Regime. The IFPR is a new prudential regime for U.K. firms authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, which it is proposed will be introduced from January 1, 2022, subject to the progress of the Financial Services Bill. The IFPR is intended to simplify the prudential requirements applicable to solo-regulated U.K. investment firms. It will not apply to the larger investment firms that will remain dually regulated, that is, prudentially regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the FCA for all other aspects. The consultation closes on February 5, 2021.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Policy Statement and Near-Final Rules on Implementation of CRD V
12/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement setting out responses to its consultations on the U.K. implementation of CRD V, as well as its near-final policy material. The final rule instruments will be published in time for the December 28, 2020 deadline for implementation of CRD V. The policy statement is relevant to U.K. banks, building societies, PRA-designated investment firms and U.K. financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Banking Consolidation Group Prudential Compliance During Brexit Transition Period
12/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on which bank entities should be responsible for ensuring compliance with consolidated prudential requirements for U.K. banking consolidation groups for a transitional period between December 28, 2020 and the date on which the relevant group's parent holding company is approved or declared exempt from the requirements under the PRA's approval regime.
Read more. -
EU Authorities Warn of Potential Loss of Preferential Capital Treatment for STS Securitizations
12/07/2020
The European Supervisory Authorities have issued a press release warning of the change in the status of "simple, transparent and standardized" securitization transactions at the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020. The Securitization Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as STS securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. Related amendments to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation set out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations. For a securitization to qualify as an STS securitization, the EU Securitization Regulation requires the originator, sponsor and securitization special purpose entity to be established in the EU. The ESA's announcement highlights that securitizations that currently meet the STS criteria may not do so from January 1, 2021, if one or more of the originator, sponsor or SSPE are established in the U.K. The loss of STS status will mean that the EU CRR preferential capital treatment is no longer available.
The European Securities and Markets Authority will be working with EU national regulators to ensure that its database of STS securitizations is up to date as at January 1, 2021.
View the ESA's press release. -
UK Parliament Publishes Financial Services Bill for Post-Brexit Regulatory Framework
10/21/2020
The U.K. Government has published a Financial Services Bill setting out a proposed regulatory framework for the financial services industry following the U.K.'s exit from the EU. The Bill is part of the U.K.'s wider initiative under the Future Regulatory Framework Review to re-frame its regulatory framework. Although Brexit has brought challenges to the financial sector, there may also be post-Brexit opportunities for the U.K. to seize. The aim of these reforms is to cement the U.K.'s position as a global financial centre of excellence. A core piece of that will be to set conditions that continue attracting business to the U.K. and to look for opportunities to cut "red tape" whilst at the same time maintaining the U.K.'s globally recognized high regulatory standards.
Read more -
UK Prudential Regulator Issues Further Consultation on Implementation of CRD V and CRR II
10/20/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a further consultation on its proposed implementation of the fifth Capital Requirements Directive. CRD V came into force in July 2019. EU Member States are required to implement the majority of CRD V provisions by December 28, 2020. As this is prior to the end of the U.K.'s Brexit transition period, the U.K. is obliged to transpose those provisions of CRD V that are applicable befor the end of the transition period into U.K. law under the terms of the EU-U.K. Withdrawal Agreement.
Read more. -
HM Treasury Publishes Results of Consultation on CRD V Implementation
10/15/2020
HM Treasury has published a summary of the responses to its consultation on the U.K.'s implementation of the fifth Capital Requirements Directive, together with HM Treasury's proposed next steps. CRD V came into force in July 2019 and EU Member States are required to implement the majority of its provisions by December 28, 2020. As this is prior to the end of the U.K.'s Brexit transition period, the U.K. is obliged to transpose these provisions of CRD V that are applicable before the end of the transition period into U.K. law under the terms of the EU-U.K. Withdrawal Agreement.
Read more. -
Bank of England Financial Policy Committee Publishes Policy Summary
10/08/2020
The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee has published its latest Policy Summary and the minutes of its meeting held on September 30, 2020. The FPC notes a range of near-term risks that could impact the U.K. economy, including the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic, post-Brexit trading arrangements between the U.K. and EU and various other geopolitical risks.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Phases Out COVID-19 Guidelines on Loan Repayments Moratoria
09/21/2020
The European Banking Authority has confirmed that it will phase out its Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative payment moratoria in accordance with its September 30, 2020 deadline. The EBA originally published the Guidelines in April 2020, stipulating that, for a period of three months, banks should not class payment moratoria that were based on national law or private-sector initiatives as forbearance or distressed restructuring practices, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Guidelines were extended for a further three months on June 30, 2020 but the EBA now intends to comply with the September 30, 2020 phase out deadline in light of the success of the temporary moratoria and the need to return to the usual rescheduling of loans on a case-by-case approach. The treatment described in the Guidelines will continue to apply to payment holidays granted prior to September 30, 2020.
View the EBA's statement on the phase-out of its Guidelines.
View details of the EBA's Guidelines. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Proprietary Trading Review
09/21/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a report on the extent of proprietary trading by PRA-authorized deposit takers and investment firms incorporated in the U.K. Restrictions on proprietary trading (being the trading of financial instruments or commodities as principal by banks or investment firms) were introduced for ring-fenced retail banks in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and came into force in January 2019. However, the U.K. decided not to impose a complete ban on proprietary trading for all banks, as had been seen in other countries, such as the U.S. under the Volcker Rule. Instead, the PRA was mandated to produce a report under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, with a view to informing the U.K. Parliament of the need for any further restrictions on proprietary trading.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Decision Excluding Eurozone Central Bank Exposures from Total Exposure Measures
09/21/2020
The European Central Bank has published a Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union temporarily excluding certain central bank exposures from significant Eurozone banks' leverage ratio calculations for the purposes of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. The Decision will enter into force on September 26, 2020 and the exclusion will apply until June 27, 2021.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Publishes Guide to Assessment Methodology for Counterparty Credit Risk and Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Calculations
09/18/2020
The European Central Bank has published its final Guide on the assessment methodology it will use to examine: (i) the internal model methods banks use to calculate exposures to counterparty credit risk; and (ii) the advanced methods banks use to calculate own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment risk. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation requires the ECB to permit banks to use internal models for counterparty credit risk purposes if those models comply with relevant CRR provisions. The ECB's Guide sets out how the ECB will determine banks' compliance.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Survey on Banks' Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Disclosure Frameworks
09/17/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a survey designed to collect information on large banks' disclosure practices on environmental, social and governance risks. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation implements the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, which require banks to disclose information about their risks and risk management procedures and policies. In 2018, the Basel Committee published updated Pillar 3 requirements. The revised CRR, published in June 2019, incorporates the revised Basel Committee disclosure standards and mandates the EBA to produce draft Implementing Technical Standards to ensure comparability of the disclosures made with international non-EU active banks.
Read more. -
EU Technical Standards Supplementing the Securitization Regulation
09/03/2020
Several EU Technical Standards supplementing the EU Securitization Regulation have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Securitization Regulation has applied directly across the EU since January 1, 2019. It provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as "simple, transparent and standardized" (STS) securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. Related amendments to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation set out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Announces Termination of Temporary Approach to VAR Back-Testing Exceptions
08/27/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement confirming that, following its review of the temporary approach that allows firms to offset increases in VAR back-testing exceptions through a reduction in risks-not-in-VAR capital requirements, it has decided to terminate the temporary approach from September 30, 2020. The PRA has made this decision because of the changes introduced to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (known as the CRR Quick Fix package), which has applied directly across the EU since June 27, 2020.
From October 1, 2020, firms should no longer apply any commensurate reduction in risks-not-in-VAR capital requirements. Firms should apply to the PRA to exclude back-testing options that do not result from deficiencies in their internal model occurring between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021.
View the PRA's statement.
View details of CRR Quick Fix. -
UK Prudential Regulator Issues Updated Statement on IFRS 9 and Capital Requirements
08/26/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a further statement on IFRS 9 and capital requirements in the context of COVID-19. In line with the Financial Conduct Authority's guidance in relation to mortgage payments, firms should consider tailored forbearance arrangements where, at the end of the COVID-19 payment deferral period, a borrower is unable to resume payments in full immediately, with all deferred sums either paid in full or capitalized. The PRA states that the tailored forbearance arrangements may be as good an indicator of significant increases in credit risk, credit impairments or defaults as forbearance before the pandemic. Any loans subject to tailored forbearance should not be automatically treated as having experienced SICR or become credit impaired or in default, and firms will need to exercise judgment where the position is not clear.
The PRA also states that some of the guidance in its statement on March 26, and June 4, 2020 continues to be relevant, depending on the circumstances.
View the PRA's statement.
View details of the PRA's June statement.
View details of the PRA's March statement. -
EU Consultation on Draft Guidelines to Implement Alternative Internal Model Approach
08/12/2020
The European Banking Authority has opened a consultation on proposed guidelines on criteria for the use of data inputs in the risk measurement model under the Internal Model Approach for market risk, set out in the revised Capital Requirements Regulation, known as CRR2. The consultation closes on November 12, 2020.
CRR2 implements a revised framework for minimum capital requirements based upon market risk—the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, published in January 2019 by the Basel Committee on Banking Standards. The revisions include an alternative IMA, one part of which is the expected shortfall risk measure used to determine capital requirements for those risk factors with sufficient available observable market data.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Provides Clarity on Application of CRR Quick Fix Package
08/11/2020
The European Banking Authority has published guidance on the impact on supervisory reporting and disclosure of the EU's CRR Quick Fix adjustments, which were made in response to COVID-19. The CRR Quick Fix introduced changes to a broad range of requirements on firms under the Capital Requirements Regulation. It has applied directly across the EU since June 27, 2020. The EBA's guidance consists of:
- Guidelines on supervisory reporting and disclosure requirements in compliance with the CRR "quick fix" in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic (EBA/GL/2020/11). These Guidelines aim to clarify how firms should report the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting versions 2.9 and 2.10, and on the existing ITS on disclosure of leverage ratio.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Proposes Principles for Operational Risk
08/06/2020
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has opened a consultation on proposed principles for operational resilience and updated Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk (PSMOR). The consultation closes on November 6, 2020.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Proceeds with Extension of Coverage under Financial Services Compensation Scheme
08/04/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement and final rules on the temporary high balances coverage extension under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. The PRA has decided to implement the proposal, made in July this year and in response to the coronavirus pandemic, to extend coverage under the FSCS for temporary high balances, from six months to 12 months from the date of the deposit or the first date the balance becomes legally transferrable to the depositor. The change will be effected by changes to the PRA's depositor protection rules and the Statement of Policy on the Deposit Guarantee Scheme. The change will take effect from August 6, 2020. The coverage will revert to six months from February 1, 2021.
View the Policy Statement, updated rules and Statement of Policy. -
EU Final Draft Technical Standards on TLAC and MREL Disclosure & Reporting
08/03/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Implementing Technical Standards on disclosure and reporting of Minimum Requirement for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities and Total Loss Absorbing Capacity. Revisions to the EU's Bank Recovery & Resolution Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation, which were finalized in 2019, implement the Financial Stability Board's TLAC requirements in the EU as well as amend the EU's existing MREL requirements. The TLAC requirements will apply to all EU global systemically important institutions and the revised MREL requirements to G-SIIs and other relevant firms. The final draft ITS will supplement the Pillar 3 disclosure requirements and supervisory reporting requirements on TLAC and MREL introduced by BRRD2 and CRR2.
The EBA has submitted the final draft ITS to the Commission for endorsement. The ITS on TLAC disclosures will apply immediately on entry into force. The MREL disclosure requirements will apply either from January 1, 2024 (the expiration date of relevant transitional periods) or from the later deadline set by the relevant resolution authority.
View the EBA's report, final draft ITS and related annexes.
View details of BRRD2.
View details of CRR2. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on UK Implementation of CRD V
07/31/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposed changes to the PRA rules to implement the fifth Capital Requirements Directive. CRD V came into force in July 2019 and EU Member States are required to implement the majority of its provisions by December 28, 2020. As this is prior to the end of the U.K.'s Brexit transition period, the U.K. must transpose those provisions of CRD V that are applicable before the end of the transition period into U.K. law under the terms of the EU-U.K. Withdrawal Agreement. Certain of those provisions (including those relating to capital buffers and holding company approval and supervision) must be implemented in the U.K. by HM Treasury. Those provisions are the subject of a separate consultation by HM Treasury consultation (published on July 16, 2020). HM Treasury has delegated responsibility for implementation of the remaining provisions to the PRA.
Read more. -
EU Single Resolution Board Publishes Guidance on Bank Operational Continuity and FMI Contingency Plans
07/29/2020
The EU Single Resolution Board has published new guidance for Eurozone banks for which it is the resolution authority on: (i) operational continuity in resolution for Eurozone banks; and (ii) financial market infrastructure contingency plans. The guidance applies to "significant" Eurozone banks that are directly prudentially supervised by the European Central Bank and certain other cross-border groups, for whom resolution is their strategy.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Results of Bank COVID-19 Vulnerability Analysis
07/28/2020
The European Central Bank Banking Division has published the results of the COVID-19 vulnerability analysis it conducted on Eurozone banks directly prudentially supervised under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The analysis was designed to establish how 86 Eurozone banks would be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and any vulnerabilities that may arise over a three-year horizon.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Announcement on Bank Dividend Payments and Share Buybacks Beyond 2020
07/28/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published an announcement on its approach to dividend payments and share buybacks by large U.K. banks subject to its prudential supervision, in light of COVID-19. The PRA states that it intends to assess firms' plans for distributions beyond 2020 in Q4 2020, taking into account banks' current and projected capital positions and the level of uncertainty around the economy, market conditions and capital trajectories at that time.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Policy Statement on Asset Encumbrance
07/27/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on asset encumbrance, relevant to all PRA-regulated firms other than credit unions and insurance firms. The Policy Statement takes account of the PRA's consultation on its proposed expectations of how firms manage prudential risks associated with asset encumbrance. "Encumbered assets" are those that are used to secure, collateralize or credit-enhance a transaction and so cannot be freely transferred or liquidated by the pledging party. The PRA's consultation aimed, among other things, to ensure that firms: (i) put in place, and document, adequate risk management processes to monitor the potential impacts of asset incumbrance; (ii) appropriately consider the effects that increased asset encumbrance may have on the restoration of financial viability during a stress scenario; and (iii) ensure that asset encumbrance levels do not unduly impact the amount and cash value of assets that could be lent against in resolution.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Recommendation on Bank Dividend Distributions During COVID-19
07/27/2020
The European Central Bank has published an updated Recommendation on dividend distributions by significant institutions that are directly prudentially supervised by the ECB. The Recommendation states that, until January 1, 2021, no dividends should be paid out for the financial years 2019 and 2020, nor should share buy-backs aimed at remunerating shareholders take place. Banks that consider themselves legally required to pay out dividends should explain their underlying reasons to their joint supervisory team. Banks that plan to pay dividends to a non-Eurozone parent institution, parent financial holding company or parent mixed financial holding company should also discuss their intentions with their joint supervisory team.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Consults on Technical Standards on Indirect Exposures
07/23/2020
The European Banking Authority has opened a consultation on proposed draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the determination of indirect exposures to clients of derivative and credit derivative contracts underlying a debt or equity instrument for large exposures purposes. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation, as amended by CRR 2, requires firms to add to the total exposures to a client the exposures arising from derivative contracts listed in Annex II of the CRR and credit derivative contracts, where the contract was not directly entered into with that client but the underlying debt or equity instrument was issued by that client. The proposed draft RTS set out how firms should determine exposures arising from derivative and credit derivative contracts not entered directly into with a client but whose underlying debt or equity instrument was issued by a client. The consultation closes on October 23, 2020.
View the EBA's consultation paper.
View details of CRR 2.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Technical Standards for Estimating Default Probabilities and Losses Given Default under CRR 2
07/22/2020
The European Banking Authority has published draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the requirements for the internal methodologies or external sources to be used for estimating default probabilities and losses given default for firms subject to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR 2). Responses to the consultation should be submitted by October 22, 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Supervision of New and Growing Non-Systemic Banks
07/22/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposed changes to its supervision of new and growing non-systemic U.K. banks. The consultation will primarily be relevant to banks in their first few years of authorization as a PRA deposit-taker and prospective banks interested in, or currently, applying for deposit taker authorization. The PRA notes that some new and growing banks may have sufficient experience and resources to quickly move to the standard expected of established banks. In deciding which banks should be subject to its new policy, the PRA would consider each banks' case on its merits and apply supervisory judgement. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by October 14, 2020. The PRA expects the amendments set out in the consultation to take effect in the first half of 2021.
Read more. -
HM Treasury Provides Guidance on Application of EU CRR Quick Fix Package During Brexit Transitional Period
07/16/2020
HM Treasury has published a statement on the application of the EU CRR Quick Fix package during the Brexit transitional period. The EU CRR Quick Fix package consists of a Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation (and also amending the Regulation amending the CRR, known as CRR2) and it was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on June 26, 2020. The Regulation forms part of the EU's response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Read more. -
UK Financial Services Sector Plan for Supporting COVID-19 Recovery
07/16/2020
TheCityUK, the U.K.'s industry body for financial and related professional services, has published a report entitled "Supporting UK Economic Recovery: Recapitalising Businesses Post COVID-19". The report sets out options for how large debt burdens incurred by small and medium-sized businesses as a result of COVID-19 can be managed. The report was prepared in consultation with financial and professional services firms, HM Treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
HM Treasury Consults on UK Implementation of CRD V
07/16/2020
HM Treasury has launched a consultation on the U.K.'s implementation of the EU amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive that were published in June 2019 (known as CRD V). EU Member States are required to implement the CRD V changes into their national regimes by December 28, 2020. As this is prior to the end of the U.K.'s Brexit transition period, the U.K must transpose those provisions of CRD V that are applicable before the end of the transition period into U.K. law under the terms of the EU-U.K. Withdrawal Agreement. HM Treasury's consultation relates only to those aspects of CRD V that must be implemented via legislation. The rest of CRD V will be implemented by the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority through updates to the PRA rules. Responses to HM Treasury's consultation should be submitted by August 19, 2020.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Finalizes Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
07/09/2020
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published final revisions to the credit valuation adjustment risk framework under the Basel III standards. The updated international standard sets out the proposed regulatory capital treatment of CVA risk for derivatives and securities financing transactions. The CVA risk framework is designed to manage the risk of banks incurring mark-to-market losses from deterioration in the creditworthiness of counterparties in derivatives or SFTs. The framework was last revised in December 2017, partly to align it with the Basel Committee's market risk framework. The latest revisions include:
- The reduction of certain risk weights;
- The introduction of new index buckets and revised aggregation of CVA capital requirements;
- An amendment to the scope of portfolios subject to CVA risk capital requirements. SFTs, where the CVA risks stemming from such positions are not material, are excluded and certain client-cleared derivatives are exempt; and
- Revision of the overall calibration of the CVA risk framework, covering both the standardized and the basic approach.
View the updated CVA standard.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Proposals to Extend Coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme
07/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has opened a consultation on proposals for extending coverage of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme for temporary high balances. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until July 23, 2020. The PRA is proposing to extend coverage under the FSCS for temporary high balances, from six months to 12 months from the date of the deposit or the first date the balance becomes legally transferrable to the depositor. The coverage would revert to six months from February 1, 2021. The proposal is made because of the impact of COVID-19 on consumers.
View the consultation paper. -
European Central Bank Publishes Guideline on Default Definition for Less Significant Eurozone Institutions
07/07/2020
The European Central Bank, Banking Supervision division has published a guideline harmonizing the threshold for assessing the materiality of credit obligations past due for the purposes of default assessments under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. CRR defines the circumstances in which an obligor under a credit obligation will be deemed to be in default. The materiality of the credit obligation is relevant for these purposes, and CRR grants competent authorities the discretion to determine, according to their view of a reasonable level of risk, the threshold against which materiality should be measured.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Report on Implementation of EU Prudential Framework During COVID-19
07/07/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a report on the implementation of certain prudential policies introduced by the EBA to deal with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The report focuses on two areas in particular: implementation issues around the EBA's Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments and the criteria that institutions should follow for the identification and treatment of operational risk events and losses.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Final Updated AML Guidelines
07/02/2020
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published final updated guidelines on the "Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism". The updated guidelines apply to all banks, banking groups and relevant regulators.
The updated guidelines include detailed guidance on the interaction between prudential and AML/CFT supervision to enhance the effectiveness of the supervision of banks' AML/CFT regimes. The updated guidelines also merge and replace two other Basel Committee documents, namely Customer due diligence for banks (October 2001) and Consolidated KYC risk management (October 2004). The guidelines should be read in conjunction with other Basel Committee papers, such as the Core principles for effective bank supervision, as well as relevant guidance published by the Financial Action Task Force.
View the updated guidelines. -
Final EU Guidelines on the Treatment of Structural FX Under Capital Requirements Regulation
07/01/2020
The European Banking Authority has published final guidelines on the implementation of the structural FX provision under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR requires institutions to calculate their net open positions in currencies according to specified formulae but permits institutions to exclude positions that have been taken for hedging purposes and that are structural. The guidelines will apply to both firms and national regulators from January 1, 2022, to allow firms time to comply with the new framework. However, regulators should review, update or revoke permissions already granted before the guidelines apply.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Statement on EU CRR ‘Quick Fix’ Package
06/30/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement on the EU Capital Requirements Regulation ‘Quick Fix’ package, confirming that it applies directly to all PRA-regulated firms. The CRR Quick Fix package has applied across the EU since June 27, 2020. The CRR Quick Fix package is part of the EU’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
In its statement, the PRA confirms that U.K.-regulated banks already applying the CRR transitional arrangements for IFRS 9 must implement the revised calculations as a result of the Quick Fix package, which extended by two years the transitional measures for the implementation of IFRS 9. In addition, a bank contemplating ceasing to apply the IFRS 9 transitional measures must first obtain PRA approval to do so. The PRA is encouraging those banks to submit their requests by July 31, 2020, which requests must include a written explanation of the basis on which senior management has satisfied itself with the continuing adequacy of the bank’s financial resources.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Updates Statement on Regulatory Reporting
06/26/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulator has announced that, given the time firms have had to adjust to working during COVID-19 and the need for prudential regulators to access data in a timely manner, the PRA expects that, in general, firms will submit regulatory reports on time going forward. Firms experiencing difficulty with this should contact their supervisor. This amends the statement made by the PRA on April 2, 2020, when it stated that it would accept delayed submission of certain regulatory returns with deadlines on or before May 31, 2020. The PRA's previous statement, which confirmed its flexibility on receiving firms' Pillar 3 disclosures, still stands, although the PRA notes that it does not expect publication timelines for Pillar 3 disclosures to be affected by COVID-19 in most cases.
View the PRA's statement on regulatory reporting during COVID-19.
View the PRA's April statement on regulatory reporting. -
EU Banking ‘Quick Fix’ Regulation Published
06/26/2020
A new EU Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation (and also amending the Regulation amending the CRR, known as CRR2), has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. It is known as the CRR Quick Fix package and applies from June 27, 2020. The Regulation forms part of the EU’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Read more. -
EU Amends Technical Standards on Prudent Valuation in Response to COVID-19
06/25/2020An EU Regulation amending the Regulatory Technical Standards on prudent valuation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amending Regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) No 101/2016 (which supplements the EU Capital Requirements Regulation) by increasing the aggregation factor applicable to the core approach from 50% to 66% until December 31, 2020, with the aim of it applying for the June 30, 2020, COREP reporting. The amending Regulation applies from June 26, 2020.
View the amending Regulation. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Technical Standards for Public Disclosures and Reporting Requirements Under CRR II
06/24/2020
The European Banking Authority has published its final reports and draft Implementing Technical Standards for public disclosures and supervisory reporting requirements under the revised EU Capital Requirements Regulation. CRR implements the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, which require banks to disclose information about their risks and risk management procedures and policies. In 2018, the Basel Committee published updated Pillar 3 requirements. The revised CRR, published in June 2019, incorporates the revised Basel Committee disclosure standards and mandates the EBA to produce the draft ITS to ensure comparability of the disclosures made with international non-EU active banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Technical Standards for Public Disclosures and Reporting Requirements Under CRR II
06/24/2020
The European Banking Authority has published its final reports and draft Implementing Technical Standards for public disclosures and supervisory reporting requirements under CRR II. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation implements the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, which require banks to disclose information about their risks and risk management procedures and policies. In 2018, the Basel Committee published updated Pillar 3 requirements. The revised CRR, published in June 2019, incorporates the revised Basel Committee disclosure standards and mandates the EBA to produce the draft ITS to ensure comparability of the disclosures made with international non-EU active banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Discussion Paper on New Investment Firm Prudential Regime
06/23/2020
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a discussion paper setting out its initial views on establishing a new Investment Firm Prudential Regime. The EU introduced a new prudential regime for EU investment firms through the Investment Firm Regulation and the Investment Firm Directive, which will (mostly) apply from June 26, 2021. The U.K. encouraged the introduction of the EU IFD and IFR while it was a member of the EU. However, the U.K. will not implement the IFR and IFD into U.K. laws as they come into force after the U.K. has left the EU and after the Brexit transitional period ends.
Read more. -
HM Treasury Updates Policy Statement on Prudential Standards for Investment Firms in UK Financial Services Bill
06/23/2020
HM Treasury has published an updated policy statement on its proposals for the prudential standards in the U.K.'s upcoming Financial Services Bill. The Financial Services Bill will set out a proposed regulatory framework for the financial services industry following the U.K.'s exit from the EU. HM Treasury published its original policy statement on the proposed prudential regime in March 2020, setting out its plans to: (i) complete the U.K.'s implementation of the remaining Basel III standards; and (ii) establish a new prudential regime for U.K. investment firms.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Amended Draft Technical Standards for Passport Notifications
06/18/2020
The European Banking Authority has published amending draft Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards on passporting notifications under the fourth Capital Requirements Directive. CRD4 requires an EU bank wishing to establish a branch in another EU Member State to notify the national regulator of its home Member State of certain information. In the event of any changes in the information supplied, the relevant bank must notify the national regulators of both the home and host Member State at least one month prior to the change coming into effect. In 2014, the EBA produced RTS on the information to be provided to the national regulators in connection with the exercise of these passporting rights, and ITS on the forms, templates and procedures for such notifications.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Extends Payments Moratoria Guidelines
06/18/2020
The European Banking Authority has extended the applicability of its Guidelines on legislative and non-legislative loan repayments in light of the ongoing effects of COVID-19. The Guidelines were originally published in April 2020 and stated that, where payment moratoria were based on national law or a private-sector initiative broadly applied by credit institutions in response to COVID-19, they would not be classified as forbearance or distressed restructuring measures. The Guidelines as originally published applied to moratoria applied before June, 30 2020. That deadline has now been extended to moratoria applied before September 30, 2020.
View the EBA's updated statement on its Guidelines on payments moratoria.
View details of the EBA's original statement on its Guidelines on payments moratoria. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Peer Review of Deposit Guarantee Scheme Stress Test Results
06/17/2020
The European Banking Authority has published the results of its peer review of EU deposit guarantee schemes. The EU Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive establishes requirements for EU DGSs, including that Member States conduct stress tests of their DGSs. Member States were required to report on their stress tests by July 3, 2019, and the EBA has based its peer review report on the results of the tests. The report is intended to assess the resilience of EU DGSs and identify good practices and areas for improvement.
Read more. -
UK Regulators Acknowledge European Systemic Risk Board Recommendation on Financial Institution Distributions
06/08/2020
The Bank of England and U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority have publicly acknowledged the ESRB's Recommendation on the restriction of distributions during COVID-19. The ESRB recommends that EU financial institutions refrain from making dividend distributions, entering into buy-backs of ordinary shares or creating obligations to pay variable remuneration to material risk takers where those actions reduce the quantity or quality of own funds at the EU group level and sub-consolidated or individual level. The BoE and PRA note that the Recommendation applies to U.K. authorities during the Brexit transition period.
View the BoE and PRA's joint statement on the ESRB's Recommendation.
View details of the ESRB's Recommendation.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
European Systemic Risk Board Announces Further Actions to Combat Impact of COVID-19
06/08/2020
The European Systemic Risk Board has announced a series of further actions designed to combat the impact of COVID-19 on European financial markets. The actions relate to the five priority areas already identified by the ESRB as requiring particular focus in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as follows:- Implications for the financial system of guarantee schemes and other fiscal measures to protect the economy: the ESRB has published a Recommendation introducing minimum requirements for national monitoring of the financial stability implications of the various debt moratoria and guarantee schemes introduced by Member States to support economies through COVID-19 (Recommendation A); national regulators are also advised to regularly report information on these schemes to the ESRB in accordance with reporting templates to be published by the ESRB by June 30, 2020 (Recommendation B); national regulators implicated by the Recommendation should communicate the actions they have taken, or intend to take, in response to the Recommendation A by July 31, 2020 and Recommendation B by December 31, 2020;
-
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Further Guidance on IFRS 9 and Capital Requirements
06/04/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a “Dear CEO” letter providing further guidance on IFRS 9 and capital requirements in the context of COVID-19. The PRA published a “Dear CEO” letter in March 2020, advising firms on the application of certain key concepts (including the definition of "default" in the Capital Requirements Regulation and expected credit loss accounting under IFRS 9). This guidance related in large part to payment holidays, many of which are now coming to an end. The PRA’s latest guidance therefore focuses on exits from those initial payment deferrals.
Read more. -
EU Consultation on Proposed Capital Requirements of Non-Modellable Risks Under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book
06/04/2020
The European Banking Authority has opened a consultation on proposed Regulatory Technical Standards on capital requirements of non-modellable risks under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book. The Regulation amending CRR, which was finalized in June 2019, implements, among other things, the Basel III revised requirements to calculate own funds requirements for market risk (FRTB). It will apply directly across the EU from June 28, 2021. The consultation closes on September 4, 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
First Consultations on Proposed Technical Standards for New EU Investment Firm Prudential Regime
06/04/2020
The European Banking Authority has opened consultations on several draft technical standards required to implement the new prudential framework for investment firms. The Investment Firm Regulation and the Investment Firm Directive introduce a more tailored prudential regulatory regime for many EU investment firms that reflect the risks inherent in the diverse activities those firms undertake. It also aims to amend the prudential requirements imposed on certain investment firms to avoid the imposition of undue administrative burdens by removing those firms from the scope of the revised Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. Only the largest investment firms will be subject to, and need to obtain bank authorization under, CRD and CRR. The majority of both the IFR and IFD will apply from June 26, 2021. The EBA's consultations are on proposed technical standards that will supplement the IFR and IFD.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Roadmap on Investment Firm Regulation and Directive Deliverables
06/02/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a new roadmap under the Investment Firm Regulation and the Investment Firm Directive. The IFR and IFD introduce a more tailored regulatory regime for many EU investment firms that reflects the risks inherent in the diverse activities those firms undertake. It also aims to amend the prudential requirements imposed on certain investment firms to avoid the imposition of undue administrative burdens by removing them from the scope of the revised Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. The majority of both the IFR and IFD will apply from June 26, 2021.
The EBA's roadmap sets out the timing for the EBA to produce final versions of Regulatory Technical Standards, Implementing Technical Standards, Guidelines and Reports. The EBA must also establish a list of capital instruments and a database of administrative sanctions. The mandates will be delivered in four phases, starting from December 2020, and cover:- Thresholds and criteria for investment firms to be subject to the CRR;
- Capital requirements and composition;
- Reporting and disclosure;
- Remuneration and governance;
- Supervisory convergence and supervisory review and Pillar 2; and
- Environmental, social and governance exposures.
View the EBA's IFR and IFD Roadmap.
View details of the IFR and IFD.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Statement on Electronic Signatures
06/02/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement on the use of electronic signatures in the context of remote working arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PRA has stated that, in the absence of specific legal provisions to the contrary, firms are entitled to use electronic signatures to submit forms and other regulatory documents to the PRA. The advice does not extend to the use of electronic signatures more generally.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on COVID-19 Exposures Reporting
06/02/2020
The European Banking Authority has published guidelines on bank reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures designed to protect borrowers from the economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis. The measures include payment moratoria, which are exempt from prudential treatment as forbearance measures and therefore not subject to the usual supervisory reporting framework. Public guarantee schemes introduced in many Member States are also not captured by existing reporting frameworks. This has created a data gap, which has implications for the risk-analysis of individual institutions and for overall financial stability in the EU.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Reports on Impact of COVID-19 on EU Banking Sector
05/25/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a report on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial health of EU banks. The report is mostly based on supervisory data submitted by banks in Q4 2019 and Q1 2020. The EBA's report confirms that banks have activated their contingency plans in response to the crisis, however, their operational capabilities remain under pressure. In addition, some banks have used parts of their capital and liquidity buffers and are expected to continue to do so in the coming months. The report also confirms that the asset quality of banks is likely to continue deteriorating as non-performing loan volumes increase.
View the EBA's report.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Guidance on Treatment of COVID-19 Payment Holidays
05/22/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a new statement on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address COVID-19. The statement follows the announcements made by the PRA, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and the U.K. Financial Reporting Council in March 2020 on financial reporting and audit requirements in light of COVID-19. Those announcements included a letter from the PRA to banks on the application of IFRS 9 (including expected credit loss accounting) to loan arrangements during the pandemic.
Read more. -
EU Single Resolution Board Publishes Revised MREL Policy
05/20/2020
The EU Single Resolution Board has published a revised policy on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities. The policy is applicable to Eurozone banks and reflects the changes made in 2019 to the EU Banking Package (which includes the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Single Resolution Board Publishes Revised MREL Policy
05/20/2020
The EU Single Resolution Board has published a revised policy on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities. The policy is applicable to Eurozone banks and reflects the changes made in 2019 to the EU Banking Package (which includes the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Consults on Climate-Related and Environmental Risks Guide for Banks
05/20/2020
The European Central Bank has launched a consultation on its proposed guide on how Eurozone banks should manage and disclose climate-related and environmental risks in accordance with the EU prudential framework. The guide is not legally binding, but aims to raise awareness within the Eurozone banking industry of climate-related and environmental risks and to improve the management of such risks. The consultation closes on September 25, 2020.
The guide applies to significant institutions directly supervised by the ECB, although national regulators in Eurozone member states are expected to apply the guide’s expectations proportionately when supervising less significant Eurozone banks. It should be read in the context of the wider EU bank prudential framework, with particular reference to the Capital Requirements Regulation, the Capital Requirements Directive and relevant ECB guidelines. The guide includes an overview of the nature and characteristics of climate-related and environmental risks as well as the ECB’s supervisory expectations of banks’ business models and strategies, governance and risk appetite and integration of climate-related and environment risks into their credit, operational, market and liquidity risk management frameworks.
View the ECB's consultation on its Climate-Related and Environmental Risks Guide. -
UK Regulator Confirms Policy on Credit Risk
05/14/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on its approach to implementing the European Banking Authority's Technical Standards and Guidelines on Probability of Default estimation, Loss Given Default estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the Internal Ratings Based approach to credit risk. The EBA's regulatory products are designed to address concerns about the variability of own funds requirements arising from the internal models that firms use to calculate their minimum credit risk capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Policy Statement is relevant to U.K. banks, building societies and PRA-designated U.K. investment firms.
Read more. -
European Systemic Risk Board Actions on Five COVID-19 Priority Areas
05/14/2020
The European Systemic Risk Board has established five priority areas on which it intends to take action to combat the impact of COVID-19 on the EU financial system. In determining its actions, the ESRB hopes to ensure an effective response to the pandemic across the EU that prevents individual Member State actions from negatively impacting the EU Single Market and to take advantage of flexibility in regulatory standards to support financial institutions in providing financial services and liquidity.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority to Act on Dividend Arbitrage Trading Schemes
05/12/2020
In response to the November 2018 request of the European Parliament to conduct an enquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes, the European Banking Authority has published a report (dated April 28, 2020) on the approach of national regulators across the EU to tackle market integrity risks associated with dividend arbitrage trading schemes. The EBA has also published a ten-point Action Plan to address the risks arising from such schemes. Both the report and Action Plan accompanied the EBA's letter to the European Parliament that describes its actions and the steps it intends to take in the future on this issue.
The report sets out the findings arising from the enquiry, which consisted of surveys of national authorities responsible for anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing and of national prudential regulators. The EBA found that dividend arbitrage trading schemes are not possible in all EU member states and that, where they are possible, they are not always regarded as a tax crime. The EBA concluded that AML and prudential authorities approach dividend arbitrage trading schemes in different ways and there are variations in the extent to which the handling of the proceeds from these schemes by financial institutions constitutes money laundering.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Statement on Pillar 2A Capital Requirements
05/07/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement announcing its decision to set all Pillar 2A requirements to a nominal amount for the purposes of the 2020 and 2021 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Processes, instead of their usual percentage of Risk Weighted Assets. The statement applies to all firms subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. The PRA has said that it is making the change as it does not consider that RWAs are a useful measure for the evolution of risks in the stressed situation that the pandemic represents. The outcome of the change is that banks are freed up to use their Pillar 2A capital to fund lending and other activities.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Interim Financial Stability Report on Impact of COVID-19
05/07/2020
The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee and Monetary Policy Committee have published reports focusing on the impact of COVID-19 on the U.K. economy and banking sector, together with the minutes of their May Committee meetings and a transcript of the BoE’s joint FPC and MPC press conference, discussing the findings of the Committee reports.
Read more. -
EU Recommendations For STS Framework For Synthetic Securitization
05/06/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a report on the feasibility of developing a framework for simple, transparent and standardized synthetic securitization that is limited to balance-sheet securitization under the EU Securitization Regulation.
The EBA is recommending:- The establishment of a cross-sectoral framework for STS synthetic securitization that is limited to balance-sheet securitization;
- To be eligible for 'STS' status, a synthetic securitization must comply with the proposed STS criteria, including the criteria adapted appropriately for synthetic securitization;
- The European Commission should consider the potential for a differentiated capital treatment for STS balance-sheet synthetic securitization; and
- Any proposal for STS synthetic securitization should include a mandate to the EBA to monitor the functioning of the STS synthetic market.
The European Commission will consider the report and recommendations in preparing its own report and, if appropriate, legislative proposal.
View the EBA's report on a STS framework for synthetic securitization. -
UK Prudential Regulator on Regulatory Treatment of UK Bounce Back Loan Scheme
05/04/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement on credit risk mitigation eligibility and the leverage ratio treatment of loans made under HM Treasury's Bounce Back Loan Scheme and a separate modification by consent of the exclusion of loans under the BBLS from the calculation of the total exposure measure of the leverage ratio.
Read more. -
Bank of England Announces COVID-19 Changes to Resolution Measures
05/01/2020
The Bank of England and U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority have issued a statement on changes to the resolution measures applicable to the major U.K. banks and building societies, designed to ease the operational burden on firms in the wake of COVID-19.
The dates by which firms must submit their first reports describing their preparations for resolution, and publish summaries of those reports, under the BoE and PRA’s new Resolvability Assessment Framework have been extended by one year. The first reports should be submitted to the PRA by October 2021 and public disclosures should be made by June 2022.
Read more. -
UK Regulators Respond to Amended COVID-19 Support Packages
04/27/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority and the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority have published guidance for firms on the implications of HM Treasury's amendments to the U.K. Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the introduction of the Bounce Back Loan Scheme.
HM Treasury has announced the new BBLS which will run alongside the existing CBILS and CLBILS, providing government guarantees for loans to small businesses of between £2,000 and £50,000. The minimum threshold for CBILS loans will be increased to £50,001, and firms with existing CBILS loans of £50,000 or less will be entitled to switch their facility to the BBLS. The BBLS will launch for applications from May 4, 2020.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidance on Prudential Flexibility for COVID-19
04/22/2020
The European Banking Authority has published guidance on its supervisory flexibility for certain aspects of the European bank prudential regulatory framework, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Q&A on Use of Liquidity and Capital Buffers During COVID-19
04/20/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Q&A guide on how banks should use their capital and liquidity buffers during the COVID-19 crisis. The PRA and Financial Policy Committee have stressed the important role that banks must play in providing liquidity to the economy in the wake of the pandemic, using all tools at their disposal, including the buffers built up in the years since the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
Read more. -
UK Conduct Regulator Statement on Financial Resilience for Solo-Regulated Firms
04/17/2020
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a statement on its intended approach to prudential regulation of FCA solo-regulated firms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Firms are expected to plan ahead and prudently manage their financial resources. Firms that have been set capital buffers are permitted to use them to support the continuation of their activities, but should contact the FCA if they intend to draw down a buffer. Firms should also maintain up-to-date wind-down plans taking account of the impact of COVID-19 and should contact the FCA if they are concerned about their ability to meet debts as they fall due or their wind-down plans identify material execution risks. Boards should be satisfied that any discretionary distributions of capital to fund share buy-backs, dividends, or upstream cash are prudent.
View the FCA's statement on financial resilience for solo-regulated firms. -
European Central Bank Announces Capital Requirements Relief for Market Risk
04/16/2020
The European Central Bank has announced its decision to temporarily reduce capital requirements for market risk in response to high levels of volatility arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The reduction will be effected via the reduction of the qualitative market risk multiplier, a supervisory measure that is set by regulators and used to compensate for underestimation of market risk capital requirements. The ECB's decision will be reviewed after six months.
View the ECB's announcement on capital requirements relief for market risk. -
G20 Action Plan for COVID-19
04/15/2020
The G20 finance ministers and central bank governors have published an Action Plan for the international response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Action Plan covers the healthcare, economic and fiscal responses that G20 members have agreed to undertake, as well as measures to ensure a return to a strong and sustainable global economy, the provision of support to countries in need and the learning of lessons in preparation for future crises.
Read more. -
COVID-19: European Central Bank Confirms Easing of Prudential Measures for Large Eurozone Banks
04/15/2020
The European Central Bank, Banking Supervision has published a letter addressed to the significant Eurozone banks that it directly prudentially supervises under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB, Banking Supervision, expresses its support of the EBA's statement dated March 31, 2020 on supervisory reporting and Pillar 3 disclosures. In line with the EBA's statement, the ECB: (i) confirms that significant Eurozone banks may delay by one month the submission of supervisory data for remittance dates between March 2020 and May 2020; (ii) excludes information on the liquidity coverage ratio; and (iii) is allowing firms an additional two months to submit information on funding plans.
The ECB recommends that Eurozone national regulators should apply the same delays to the smaller Eurozone banks.
View the ECB's letter to significant banks.
View details of the EBA's statement on supervisory reporting and Pillar 3 disclosures.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
European Banking Authority Updates Guidelines on Equivalence of Non-EU Confidentiality Regimes
04/15/2020
The European Banking Authority has published updated Guidelines on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes under the Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA has added one new third-country national regulator—the New York State Department of Financial Services—to the current list of third-country national regulators whose confidentiality regimes can be regarded as equivalent to those in the EU, following an assessment of the professional secrecy and confidentiality frameworks under which they operate. The updated recommendations apply from April 16, 2020. The Guidelines are intended to assist national regulators in the EU in their assessment of third-country equivalence with the aim of facilitating cooperation with third-country supervisory authorities and their participation in supervisory colleges overseeing international banks.
View the updated Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Announces Delays for Certain Regulatory Reporting and Disclosure Requirements
04/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has announced a series of amendments to regulatory reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to U.K. banks, building societies, designated investment firms and credit unions, in light of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The PRA’s changes follow recent statements and recommendations made by the European Banking Authority, providing clarity on measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the EU banking sector.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes 2020/2021 Business Plan
04/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published its Business Plan for 2020/2021, which sets out its strategic goals for the next 12 months and its work plan to deliver them. The PRA has had to tailor its intended Business Plan to take account of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, it has elected to cancel its 2020 annual cyclical scenario stress tests, delay the publication of the results of the 2019 biennial exploratory scenario, postpone less critical aspects of its supervisory program for individual firms and extend consultation periods and implementation timeframes for new initiatives where possible.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Takes Further Steps in Response to COVID-19
04/09/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has announced two further measures in response to the coronavirus outbreak. The first is the PRA's decision to maintain the systemic risk buffer rates at the rate set in December 2019. The rates determine the amount of additional regulatory capital that must be held by "systemic risk buffer institutions" (i.e. U.K. financial institutions deemed to be systemically important). In scope firms are the so-called "ring-fenced bodies" within the meaning in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and include banks and large building societies holding more than £25bn in deposits. The buffer applicable to each institution is intended to reflect the relative costs to the U.K. economy if the institution in question were to fall into distress. In December 2019, the PRA maintained the rates that had first been set in May 2019. The SRB rates will be re-assessed in December 2021 and the decision taken then will take effect in January 2023.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Report on Impact of Basel III Reforms
04/08/2020
The European Banking Authority has published two reports on the impact of the Basel III liquidity coverage ratio, as implemented in the EU, and the estimated impact of the Basel III credit and market risk, and credit valuation adjustment reforms, which are yet to be implemented by the EU. The reports are based on 2019 data that was collected prior to the outbreak of COVID-19.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Announces Further Measures to Alleviate COVID-19 Impact
04/03/2020
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has announced a series of measures designed to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the global banking sector. The latest measures are designed to facilitate bank lending to the real economy and boost banks’ operational capacity to the financial strain of COVID-19. They follow the extension to Basel III implementation deadlines announced by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision on March 27, 2020.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Welcomes Postponement of Basel III Implementation
04/02/2020HM Treasury and the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority have published a joint statement welcoming the delay to implementation of certain aspects of the Basel III regulatory reforms, announced by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision. The GHOS has delayed the deadlines for introducing certain Basel III standards by one year until 2023 (or, in the case of the output flow, 2028). The Treasury and PRA intend to work together to produce a U.K. implementation timetable that is consistent with the GHOS’s delay.
View the PRA's statement on the delayed implementation of Basel III.
View details of the GHOS's delays to the implementation of Basel III.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available at our COVID-19 Research Center. -
European Banking Authority Guidelines on Treatment of COVID-19 Payments Moratoria
04/02/2020
The European Banking Authority has published guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments applied in light of the COVID-19 crisis. The Guidelines state that, where payment moratoria are based on national law or a private-sector initiative broadly applied by credit institutions in response to COVID-19, they will not be classified as forbearance or distressed restructuring measures.
Read more. -
Single Resolution Board Letter to Eurozone Banks on COVID-19 Relief Measures
04/01/2020
The EU Single Resolution Board has written to Eurozone banks about potential COVID-19 relief measures. It is united with the European Supervisory Authorities and national regulators in aiming to alleviate operational burdens on banks to enable them to deal with the COVID-19 crisis. The SRB intends to apply a pragmatic and flexible approach to 2020 resolution plans and MREL decisions and will consider postponing less urgent information requests where necessary. It does, however, confirm that Eurozone banks still need to submit the following reports: Liability Data Report, Additional Liability Report and MREL quarterly template.
View the SRB's letter to Eurozone banks. -
UK Prudential Regulator Statement on Bank Dividends and Bonuses in Light of COVID-19
03/31/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement supporting the decisions of the U.K.'s largest banks to suspend dividends and buybacks on ordinary shares until the end of 2020 and to cancel outstanding 2019 dividends. The PRA also makes it clear that it expects banks to refrain from paying cash bonuses to senior staff, including material risk takers. In parallel, the PRA has written to the CEOs of the largest U.K. banks (HSBC, Nationwide, Santander, Standard Chartered, Barclays, RBS and Lloyds Banking Group), notifying them of the PRA's expectation that they should not pay cash bonuses to senior staff.
View the PRA's statement. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Capital Requirements Guidance for UK Firms in Light of COVID-19
03/31/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published two statements addressed to U.K. firms on the application of certain requirements of the EU Capital Requirements Regulation.
The first statement sets out the PRA's approach to calculating exposure under the internal models method for counterparty credit risk in light of the significant moves in counterparty credit risk exposures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Firms are reminded of their notification obligations in relation to any changes they make to their internal models method models as a result of the PRA's guidance.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Issues Statements on Addressing COVID-19 Impact for EU Banking Sector
03/31/2020
The European Banking Authority has published three statements providing clarity on measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the EU banking sector. The statements are: Statement on supervisory reporting and Pillar 3 disclosures in light of COVID-19: referring to its statement issued on March 12, 2020, the EBA outlines further details on actions that firms, national regulators and resolution authorities can take to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. The EBA stresses the importance of firms providing reliable data for supervisory purposes, particularly given market fluctuations. However, the EBA reiterates that some leeway can be given to firms for certain areas and asks national regulators to consider the extent to which a delay to submission of data may be justified. In general, the EBA suggests that firms should be given an additional month to submit data (with an additional two months given for remittance of data on funding plans), but national regulators should confirm the precise requirements. The EBA excludes from the forbearance information on the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and reporting for resolution planning purposes. The EBA also encourages national regulators to be flexible about the deadline for firms to publish their Pillar 3 data. Firms should contact their regulator if they expect that there will be a delay to their Pillar 3 disclosures.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Defers Basel III Implementation in Response to COVID-19
03/30/2020
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has delayed the implementation timeline for Basel III to allow firms to focus on tackling the challenges resulting from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
Read more. -
COVID-19: European Central Bank Recommends Suspension of Dividends by Large Eurozone Banks
03/27/2020
The European Central Bank has published an updated Recommendation requiring the largest Eurozone-based banks to suspend the payment of any dividends and buyback of shares until at least October 1, 2020. The Recommendation is addressed to significant institutions that are directly prudentially supervised by the ECB. Eurozone national regulators of smaller banks are expected to apply the Recommendation, as deemed appropriate. The Recommendation applies to both 2019 and 2020 dividends, but does not retroactively apply to dividends that have already been paid for the 2019 financial year. Where a bank believes that it is legally obliged to make a dividend pay-out, it should explain the reasons to its joint supervisory team.
The purpose of the Recommendation is to ensure that banks are able to maintain their lending and therefore the support of businesses during the current global pandemic.
View the ECB recommendation here.
View the ECB press release here.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
UK Financial Conduct Authority Expectations on Financial Resilience of Firms
03/26/2020
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a statement reminding firms that they are able to use capital and liquidity buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The FCA also stated that firms should plan ahead and ensure that any potential exit from the market is conducted in an orderly manner. The statement is relevant for firms that are solo-regulated by the FCA.
Firms are encouraged to contact the FCA if they are unable to meet their capital requirements.
View the FCA announcement.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
COVID-19: UK Regulators Issue Joint Statement on Financial Statement Requirements
03/26/2020
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, the Financial Reporting Council and the Prudential Regulation Authority have announced a number of measures and initiatives to assist firms during the current global coronavirus pandemic. These include:- a statement from the FCA on the publishing of audited financial reports for listed companies;
- guidance from the FRC for companies preparing financial statements to be read in conjunction with PRA guidance on assessing expected loss under IFRS9; and
- guidance from the FRC for audit firms.
Read more. -
COVID-19: European Securities and Markets Authority Publishes Statement on Accounting Implications
03/25/2020
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a statement to ensure the consistent application by issuers of International Financial Reporting Standards within the European Union. In particular, it addresses the requirement for consistent application of IFRS 9 related to the classification of financial assets and liabilities. ESMA considers a range of accounting implications that may arise for Issuers as a result of national governments' and EU bodies' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Provides Clarity on the Prudential Framework in Light of COVID-19
03/25/2020
The European Banking Authority has released two separate statements in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the first covering bank prudential regulation and the second dealing with consumer protection and payment services.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Announces Postponement of Certain of its Activities
03/25/2020
In order to ensure that banks are able to focus on key operations throughout the current COVID-19 pandemic, the European Banking Authority has announced a postponement and extension of certain activities.
Read more. -
Bank of England Financial Policy Summary and Record of the Financial Policy Committee March 2020 Meetings
03/24/2020
The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee met on March 9 and 19, 2020, a time when the COVID-19 pandemic dominated the news and in turn presented challenges for markets.
Read more. -
Bank of England Announces COVID-19 Policy Measures
03/20/2020
The Bank of England has announced a series of supervisory and policy measures designed to help firms prudentially regulated by the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority (banks, building societies, insurers and large investment firms) and BoE-regulated financial market infrastructures (CCPs, central securities depositories and recognized payment systems) with the impact of COVID-19.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Announces Temporary Capital and Operational Relief for Banks
03/12/2020
The European Central Bank has announced a series of measures designed to support banks to continue their vital role of funding the real economy in the wake of COVID-19. Banks will be permitted temporarily to operate below the level of capital required by Pillar 2 Guidance, the capital conservation buffer and the liquidity ratio. They will also be permitted partially to use capital instruments that do not qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 capital to meet Pillar 2 Requirements. The ECB hopes that, together with EU national regulators' relaxation of the countercyclical capital buffer, these measures will provide significant capital relief to banks.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Prioritizes Supporting Core Bank Operations
03/12/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a statement on actions to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the EU banking sector. In the statement, the EBA states that it is working with the European Central Bank and EU national regulators to ease the immediate operational burden on EU banks and recommends that national regulators should use, where appropriate, the flexibility embedded in the regulatory framework.
The EBA views supporting banks' focus on core operations as a priority and has decided to postpone the EU-wide stress test to 2021. However, the EBA will conduct an additional EU-wide transparency exercise to provide updated information on banks' exposures and asset quality. The EBA also recommends that national regulators grant some flexibility on the remittance dates for supervisory reporting by banks.
The EBA states that banks should adopt prudent dividend and other distribution policies, including variable remuneration.
View the EBA's statement.
Details of other regulatory responses to COVID-19 are available on our COVID-19 Research Center. -
HM Treasury Policy Statement on Prudential Standards for Investment Firms in UK Financial Services Bill
03/11/2020
HM Treasury has published a policy statement on its proposals for the prudential standards in the U.K.'s upcoming Financial Services Bill. The Financial Services Bill will set out a proposed regulatory framework for the financial services industry following the U.K.'s exit from the EU. The U.K. has historically wished and repeatedly sought to impose higher capital requirements on banks and investment firms than the EU has accepted, in part driven by the better capitalization of U.K. banks compared to some EU institutions. The new policy statement establishes four overarching principles which will govern HM Treasury's approach to prudential standards: (i) financial stability and high international standards; (ii) supporting growth, competition and competitiveness; (iii) giving U.K. regulators a central role in designing technical prudential requirements; and (iv) flexibility, allowing the U.K. to maintain its relationship with the EU and take account of U.K.-specific requirements.
Read more. -
Single Resolution Board Launches Consultation on Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities Policy
02/17/2020
The Single Resolution Board has launched a consultation on proposed changes to its policy on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) for Eurozone banks, designed to bring the SRB’s MREL policy in line with the changes introduced by the 2019 EU banking package for EU banks. MREL is the EU's precursor to total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) standards at international level. The SRB is responsible for ensuring the compliance of Eurozone-based institutions that are subject to the Single Resolution Mechanism (primarily Eurozone countries) with their resolution and recovery planning requirements. It works with national regulators from Eurozone countries to determine MREL requirements. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by March 6, 2020. The SRB expects to publish its final MREL Policy Statement based on these responses by the end of April 2020 and will apply the policy to MREL decisions taken in early 2021.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Guidelines on Systemic Risk Buffers for Sectoral Exposures
02/12/2020
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on proposed Guidelines on the appropriate subsets of sectoral exposures to which national regulators may apply a systemic risk buffer under the Capital Requirements Directive. CRD 5 amended the provisions on when a national regulator may set a systemic risk buffer for sectoral exposures. The EBA is mandated to prepare Guidelines to enhance harmonization of the approach across the EU. CRD 5 must be transposed into Member State laws by December 28, 2020 and those laws must be applied from December 29, 2020. Responses to the consultation can be submitted until July 13, 2020. Once finalized, the Guidelines will apply to the relevant national regulators from December 29, 2020.
View the consultation paper.
View details of CRD 5 and CRR 2.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Proposes Guide on Assessing Counterparty Credit Risk
02/07/2020
The Banking Supervision arm of the European Central Bank has opened a consultation on a proposed guide on assessing counterparty credit risk. The proposed guide sets out the ECB's approach to assessing the internal models that banks use to calculate their exposure to counterparty credit risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The proposed guide would apply to those Eurozone banks for which the ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism, and that are permitted to use internal model methods. The consultation closes on March 18, 2020.
View the ECB public consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report on Diversity Practices in Banks and Investment Firms
02/03/2020
The European Banking Authority has issued a report on diversity practices in credit institutions and investment firms. The report is based on diversity data collected by national regulators under the Capital Requirements Directive. CRD requires banks (known as “credit institutions”) and investment firms to adopt policies promoting diversity in their management bodies. The report finds that 41% of institutions still do not have a diversity policy, despite a CRD obligation to implement one. Even amongst institutions that have implemented a policy, not all promote gender diversity. The EBA is calling on institutions and Member States to consider additional measures to promote a more balanced gender representation and to ensure compliance with diversity policy requirements. It intends to continue monitoring diversity in management bodies and to issue further benchmark studies in the future.
View the EBA's report on diversity practices. -
EU Amends Implementing Standards for Diversified Stock Indices Under Capital Requirements Legislation
01/29/2020
A Commission Implementing Regulation amending existing Implementing Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The ITS specify the stock indices that are sufficiently diversified to be counted as individual equities, without requiring market participants to take account of their specific risk under CRR for any stock index future placed on them. The amendments to the ITS update the stock indices listed in light of the latest available data. The ITS will apply directly across Member States from February 19, 2020.
View the amending Commission Implementing Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Policy Statement on Changes to Pillar 2 Capital Requirements
01/23/2020
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement following its consultation last year on changes to the Pillar 2 capital requirements for banks and large investment firms. The amendments will apply from January 23, 2020. The PRA has made some changes to the proposed text following feedback from respondents that further clarification would be helpful, in particular on the setting of the PRA buffer using the hurdle rate in stress, buffer interactions and usability. The amendments are implemented in:- Statement of Policy, "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital";
- Supervisory Statement, "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" (SS31/15); and
- Supervisory Statement, "Implementing CRD IV: Capital buffers" (SS6/14).
View the Policy Statement.
View the updated Statements.
View details of the PRA's consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Proposals to Amend the EU-Wide Stress Test Framework for Banks
01/22/2020
The European Banking Authority has commenced a consultation on proposed changes to the EU-wide stress test framework for banks. The EU-wide stress test contributes to improving the financial resilience of banks. Responses to the consultation may be submitted until June 30, 2020. The EBA is holding a public hearing on the proposals on February 21, 2020.
The EBA is proposing to amend the framework to have two parts. The first would be the supervisory element, based on a common EU methodology. It would include the current constrained bottom-up approach, but also have an option for national regulators to adjust or replace banks' estimates based on top-down models and other tools. The second part would be the bank element and would be based on the same common methodology applied in the supervisory part. However, banks would be given more discretion to calculate their projections, provided an explanation and disclosure of the rational and impact of any deviations is possible. The quality of disclosure of the results would remain high, with only the supervisory leg being amended to limit the quantity of disclosure. Feedback is also sought on the approach to scenario designs.
View the consultation paper and other details. -
European Central Bank Sets Out Expectations of Eurozone Banks' Dividend and Variable Remuneration Policies
01/21/2020
The Banking Supervision arm of the European Central Bank has set out its expectations of Eurozone banks regarding their dividend distribution and variable remuneration policies. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and has certain powers relating to the supervision by national Eurozone regulators of smaller banks. The ECB has published a letter addressed to significant banks warning them to take a "prudent, forward-looking stance" when setting the banks' remuneration policy and has also published a Recommendation (dated January 17, 2020) on requiring significant banks to "establish dividend policies using conservative and prudent assumptions". The Recommendation will apply directly to significant Eurozone banks. The ECB expects national Eurozone regulators to consider how it might be applied proportionally to the smaller banks. The ECB expects Eurozone banks to consider how their variable remuneration policies and dividend distribution policies will impact their ability to continue to meet their regulatory capital requirements, particularly taking into account the transitional provisions of the Capital Requirements Directive (version IV) and the transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 on own funds.
View the ECB's letter.
View the ECB's Recommendation. -
European Central Bank Consults on Proposed Guidelines on Materiality Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due for Small Eurozone Banks
01/20/2020
The European Central Bank has opened a consultation on proposed guidelines on the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions based in the Eurozone. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation risk quantification provisions set out that a default occurs when an obligor is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to a firm, its parent or any of its subsidiaries. The materiality of the credit obligation is to be assessed against a threshold set by the national regulator according to its view of a reasonable level of risk. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and has set the materiality threshold for these firms. The proposed guidelines are addressed to national Eurozone regulators within the SSM responsible for setting the threshold for less significant institutions. The ECB is proposing a single materiality threshold for all less significant institutions, both for retail and non-retail exposures.
The consultation closes on February 17, 2020.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Technical Standards Governing Own-Funds Requirements for Non-Trading Book Positions
01/13/2020
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on its draft regulatory technical standards specifying how institutions should calculate their own funds requirements for market risk in respect of non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign-exchange risk or commodity risk. The draft RTS have been published for consultation in accordance with the revised Capital Requirements Regulation, which came into force on June 7, 2019 and (subject to certain exceptions) will apply directly across the EU from June 28, 2021. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by April 10, 2020. The EBA is expected to consult in 2020 on other technical standards to supplement CRR II and has published a roadmap providing the due dates for its deliverables.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report on Big Data and Advanced Analytics
01/13/2020
The European Banking Authority has published a report on big data and advanced analytics in the banking sector. The report sets out the findings of the EBA's review of big data and analytics and presents key pillars and elements of trust for the development, implementation and adoption of BD&AA by banks.
Read more. -
Bank of England and UK Conduct Regulator Announce Proposals for Financial Sector Data Reforms
01/07/2020
The Bank of England and U.K. Financial Conduct Authority have published a series of proposals setting out their plans to enhance their data and analytics capabilities. The proposals include a revised FCA data strategy, a BoE discussion paper on transforming data collection and a viability report published by the FCA and BoE, together with seven regulated firms, on the possibilities of digital regulatory reporting. The FCA and BoE depend on data to conduct their supervisory responsibilities.
Read more. -
European Parliament Publishes Resolution on EU Financial Services Regulation for Third Countries
12/23/2019
The European Parliament has published a resolution on relationships between the EU and third countries concerning financial services regulation and supervision. The resolution follows the publication of a report in August 2018 by the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs setting out its proposal for the European Parliament’s resolution, which comes in the wake of the U.K.’s upcoming exit from the EU. The key factors prompting the resolution include the need to mitigate risks to financial stability arising from a possible no-deal Brexit, the need for clarification of the relationship between third-country markets and the EU’s single market in the interests of broader financial stability and the fact that existing third-country equivalence rules are not currently subject to a single framework.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Feedback to Resolution Planning Disclosures Consultation
12/20/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a statement summarizing the feedback it received to its June 2019 consultation on firms’ public disclosures on resolution planning and resolvability. The consultation sought feedback on a series of questions regarding general and firm-specific disclosures made by systemically important banks and other firms subject to resolution planning requirements.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Feedback to Derivatives and Trading Portfolios’ Solvent Wind-Down Consultation
12/20/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a statement summarizing the feedback it received to its June 2019 consultation on the solvent wind-down of derivatives and trading portfolios. The consultation sought feedback on a series of questions regarding existing wind-down practices that may be used as a recovery option for global systemically important institutions that find themselves under stress. The FSB intended to consider publishing guidance on solvent wind-down planning depending on the responses elicited by the consultation.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Technical Standards for the Standardized Approach to Counterparty Credit Risk
12/18/2019
The European Banking Authority has published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards governing the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk in derivatives transactions. The final draft SA-CCR RTS will supplement the requirements set out in the EU's Capital Requirements Regulation, as amended by CRR 2. The SA-CCR requirements aim to address the shortcomings of existing calculation methods to ensure parties are adequately protected in the event of default by a counterparty to a derivatives transaction and these final draft RTS aim to ensure a more harmonized calculation of own funds requirements for counterparty credit risk than has been the case under CRR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulatory Authority Responds on Prudential Impediments for Banks Arising from the LIBOR Transition
12/18/2019
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a letter addressed to the Chair of the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates. The letter responds to the Working Group's letter in October 2019 requesting regulatory forbearance or clarification from regulators on the impact that the LIBOR transition is likely to have on the prudential requirements for banks. The main issues raised by the Working Group include: (i) the potential for certain capital instruments to no longer qualify as regulatory capital; (ii) the potential for securitizations and MREL-eligible instruments to be considered as "new contracts" as a result of changes to contractual terms, leading to the need to insert bail-in or other bank recovery contractual terms; and (iii) that many banks will need to obtain regulatory approvals for alterations to the models used to determine their regulatory capital arising from their exposures and risks.
Read more. -
EU Recommendations to Combat Undue Short-Term Pressure From Financial Sector on Corporates
12/18/2019
The European Supervisory Authorities have each published advice to the European Commission on undue short-term pressure from the financial sector on corporations. The ESAs comprise the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The ESAs' advice responds to the European Commission's request in June 2019 for evidence and possible advice on potential undue short-term pressure by financial service participants on corporations. The Commission asked the ESAs to: (i) provide evidence of any short-termism and, if any, the consequences thereof; (ii) assess the drivers of such short-termism, including the effects of regulation on financial market participants, for example, the guidance on remuneration practices; (iii) identify existing regulations that either mitigate or exacerbate short-term pressures; and (iv) evaluate the need for regulatory or policy action and propose specific areas where action is needed. The ESAs' advice, summarized below, may result in the Commission proposing amendments to several pieces of EU legislation, such as the Capital Requirements Directive and related Regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments package and the Non-Financial Reporting Directive.
Read more. -
Bank of England Consults on Proposed 2021 Climate Change Stress Tests
12/18/2019
The Bank of England has published a discussion paper seeking feedback on its proposals for a series of 2021 stress-tests on climate-related risks for the largest banks, insurers and the financial system. The stress tests will help to quantify potential climate change risks faced by the financial system and enable market participants and oversight bodies like the BoE to develop measures to prepare for those risks. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by March 18, 2020. The final stress testing framework will be published in the second half of 2020 with the results of the exercise published in 2021.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Finalizes Revisions to Pillar 2 Liquidity Reporting Frequency
12/17/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulatory Authority has published a Policy Statement, revised reporting rules and a revised Supervisory Statement on the PRA's approach to supervising liquidity and funding risks (SS 25/15).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Policy Committee Highlights Risks of Open-Ended Funds and Global Stablecoins
12/16/2019
The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England has published its latest financial stability report. The report sets out the FPC's view of the resilience of the U.K. financial system and the main risks to the U.K.'s financial stability as well as the work being carried out to address those risks. The FPC states that the 2019 annual cyclical scenario stress test indicates that the U.K. banking system would be resilient to deep simultaneous U.K. and global recessions. Furthermore, the U.K. financial system is resilient to and prepared for any disruptions that may arise from a disorderly Brexit.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Prudential Treatment of Crypto-Assets
12/12/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a discussion paper seeking the views of stakeholders on the prudential regulatory treatment of crypto-assets. The paper is relevant for academics, banks, central banks, finance ministries, market participants, payment system operators and providers, supervisory authorities and technology companies. Responses should be submitted by March 13, 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Publishes Amendments to Eligible Collateral Standards Under Capital Requirements Regulation
12/11/2019
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published draft Implementing Technical Standards amending the existing ITS that establish the standards for the main indices and recognized exchanges that can hold securities eligible as collateral under the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (or “CRR II”).
Read more. -
European Systemic Risk Board Publishes Recommendation on Collection of Information from Banks
12/09/2019
The European Systemic Risk Board has published a Recommendation on the exchange and collection of information for macroprudential purposes by national regulators about branches of banks (credit institutions) that have their head office in another Member State or in a third country.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Publishes Amendments to Closely Correlated Currencies Standards Under the Capital Requirements Regulation
12/09/2019
The European Commission’s Implementing Technical Standards amending the existing Implementing Regulation on closely correlated currencies has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Report on Banks’ Funding Plans Guidelines
12/09/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its final report on an update of its guidelines on harmonized definitions and templates for banks (credit institutions) to report their funding plans in accordance with the European Systemic Risk Board’s Recommendation on the funding of banks. The Guidelines apply to national regulators and banks that report their funding plans to national regulators in accordance with the local implementation of the European Systemic Risk Board’s Recommendation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Conduct Regulator Publishes Consultation on Proposed Miscellaneous Changes to Rules
12/06/2019
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a consultation on its proposed changes to various aspects of the FCA Handbook.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Action Plan on Sustainable Finance
12/06/2019
The European Banking Authority has published an action plan on sustainable finance, setting out how it intends to deliver on its aims to help combat environmental, social and governance risks and providing clarity on the direction of its policy in this area. The EBA has been mandated to contribute to work on ESG risks under various pieces of EU legislation and will focus on environmental factors and climate change in its initial phase of work. The action plan also sets out the EBA’s projected timelines and milestones on sustainable finance.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Outsourcing and Third Party Risk Management Rules
12/05/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority is consulting on proposals for modernizing the regulatory framework on outsourcing and third party risk management by the financial services sector. The proposals are relevant to banks, building societies, PRA-designated investment firms, insurance and reinsurance firms and groups in scope of the Solvency II Directive as well as U.K. branches of overseas banks and insurers. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by April 3, 2020. The PRA aims to publish its final policy on the proposals in the second half of 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
New Regulation and Directive Governing Prudential Requirements for EU Investment Firms
12/05/2019
The new EU Investment Firms Regulation and Investment Firms Directive have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The new legislation aims to create a more tailored regulatory regime for many EU investment firms that reflects the risks inherent in the diverse activities those firms undertake.
Read more. -
UK Regulators Launch Consultation on Operational Resilience in Financial Services
12/05/2019
The Bank of England, U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority and U.K. Financial Conduct Authority have published a shared policy summary and consultation papers on strengthening operational resilience in the financial services sector. The consultation impacts banks, building societies, PRA-designated investment firms, firms subject to the Solvency II Directive, recognized investment exchanges, CCPs, central securities depositories, payment system operators, FCA enhanced scope SM&CR firms and entities authorized and registered under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and Electronic Money Regulations 2011. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by April 3, 2020.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Advice on EU Implementation of Basel III
12/04/2019
The European Banking Authority has published the second part of its two-part technical advice on the impact of the Basel III reforms in the EU. The Basel III reforms aim to reduce excessive variability of risk weighted assets and improve the comparability of banks’ capital ratios, and in 2018, the European Commission requested the EBA to provide technical advice on their implementation in the EU. The first part of the EBA’s advice was delivered in August 2019, relating to Basel III reforms to credit risk, operational risk, output floor and securities financing transactions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Final Report on Impact of Regulatory Reforms for SME Financing
11/29/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published its final report on the impact of financial regulatory reforms on the provision of financing to small- and medium-sized enterprises. The report follows the FSB’s consultation in June 2019 on its draft paper examining the way in which the Basel III and certain national and regional regulatory reforms have impacted SME financing.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on Technology and Security Risk Management
11/28/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its final guidelines on the management of information and communication technology and security risks by financial institutions in the EU. The Guidelines set out how financial institutions should comply with relevant provisions on the governance and risk management of ICT and security risks under the Fourth Capital Requirements Directive and the Second Payment Services Directive.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Consultation on Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk
11/28/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation paper seeking feedback on its final amendments to the credit valuation adjustment risk framework set out under the Basel III standards. The paper provides a detailed description of the amendments and sets out the proposed revised standards. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by February 25, 2020.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Guidance on Sector-Specific Capital Buffers
11/27/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has today published its guiding principles for the operationalization of a sectoral countercyclical capital buffer (or "SCCyB"). The SCCyB complements the Basel Committee's countercyclical buffer by establishing capital requirements that could be imposed on a particular sector, in addition to the countercyclical buffer that is based on banks' total risk weighted assets. The SCCyB will only apply to jurisdictions that choose to implement it on a voluntary basis and will not form part of the Basel standards.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Statement on Proportionate Implementation of Basel Framework
11/26/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a joint statement with the Basel Consultative Group on the proportionality of the implementation of the Basel Framework by the banks and jurisdictions to which it applies. The Basel Consultative Group is the Basel Committee's sub-group responsible for enhancing the Basel Committee's engagement with global supervisors, including those from non-member countries. The Basel Framework is the set of bank prudential standards established by the Basel Committee that Basel members have agreed to implement. The joint statement confirms the role of proportionality that is established in the Basel Committee's "Core principles for effective banking supervision".
The statement follows the Basel Committee's survey on proportionality in bank regulation and supervision, in which it found that a majority of Basel Committee and BCG jurisdictions apply proportionality measures in supervision of banks.
View the Basel Committee's statement on proportionality.
View the Basel Committee's Core principles for effective banking supervision.
View the Basel Committee's survey on proportionality in bank regulation and supervision.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Consultation on Draft MREL and TLAC Disclosure and Reporting Standards
11/22/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper on its draft Implementing Technical Standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (or “MREL”) and total loss-absorbing capacity (or “TLAC”). Responses to the consultation should be submitted by February 22, 2020. The EBA expects to submit the final draft ITS to the European Commission in June 2020.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes 2019 List of Global Systemically Important Banks
11/22/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published the 2019 list of global systemically important banks. Alongside the 2019 G-SIB list, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published further information relating to its 2019 assessment of G-SIBs, including:
- The denominators of each of the 12 high-level indicators used to calculate the banks’ scores under the G-SIB methodology;
- The 12 high-level indicators used to calculate these denominators; and
- The cutoff score used to identify the G-SIBs in the updated list and the thresholds used to allocate G-SIBs to buckets for the purpose of calculating the specific higher loss absorbency requirements.
The Basel Committee assessment was based on its 2013 methodology for identifying G-SIBs. A revised assessment methodology was published by the Basel Committee in July 2018, which is expected to be implemented by member jurisdictions by 2021.
View the 2019 G-SIB list.
View the Basel Committee's statement on its G-SIB assessment methodology.
View details of the Basel Committee's revised assessment framework for G-SIBs.
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Specific Supervisory Reporting Requirements for Market Risk
11/21/2019
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on its proposed draft Implementing Technical Standards on specific supervisory reporting requirements for market risk. “Market risk” relates to the risk of losses that banks face to their on- and off-balance sheet positions from adverse movements in market prices. The EBA was mandated to produce the ITS under the Capital Requirements Regulation II, published in June 2019, which made extensive changes to the EU’s capital requirements regime, including through the implementation of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s international standards on market risk.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Roadmap for Technical Standards and Guidelines Supplementing the Risk Reduction Package
11/21/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a roadmap for the risk reduction package that involved changes to the EU Capital Requirements Regulation, the Capital Requirements Directive and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. The EBA is mandated within the changed legislation to prepare technical standards, guidelines and reports on governance and remuneration, large exposures, resolution, reporting and disclosure. The EBA's roadmaps set out the timelines for delivery of all of the mandates, including where deadlines have been adjusted by the EBA.
View the EBA's roadmaps for the risk reduction package.
View details of CRD5 and CRR2.
View details of BRRD 2. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements for Market Risk and Sovereign Exposures
11/14/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has opened two consultations on revisions to the Basel III Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, one related to market risk disclosures and one on sovereign exposures disclosures. Responses to both consultations should be submitted by February 14, 2020. No indication is given as to when the sovereign exposure disclosure requirements might be introduced. The Basel Committee intends to publish the revisions of the market risk disclosure requirements in time for implementation of the revisions by member jurisdictions by no later than January 1, 2022.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports Reduction in EU Banks’ Non-Performing Loans
11/08/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a report on non-performing loans in the EU banking sector, in which it finds that total NPLs have decreased from over €1.5 trillion in June 2015 to €636 billion in June 2019. The level of European NPLs was a key concern for EU supervisors and market participants following the financial crisis, triggering efforts to deal with the issue at a supervisory, political and market participant level.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Consultation on Coordination of Prudential and AML/CFT Supervision
11/08/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation paper on the “Introduction of guidelines on interaction and cooperation between prudential and anti-money laundering/counter-terrorism financing supervision”. Under the consultation paper, the Basel Committee proposes to amend its guidelines on the “Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism” to include guidance on the interaction between prudential and AML/CFT supervision in a bid to enhance the effectiveness of the supervision of banks’ AML/CFT regimes. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by February 6, 2020.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Plenary Meets to Review Global Financial System Vulnerabilities, FinTech and its 2020 Work Program
11/07/2019
The Financial Stability Board has met in Paris to review key issues facing financial markets, including vulnerabilities in the global financial system, FinTech developments and its 2020 work program.
Read more. -
European Commission Confirms Fitness of EU Supervisory Reporting Requirements for Financial Services
11/07/2019
The European Commission has published the results of its “fitness check” of EU supervisory reporting requirements. The reporting requirements imposed by EU and national regulatory authorities require regulated institutions to provide information to their respective authorities regarding their financial condition and activities. The European Commission assessed the effectiveness, coherence, relevance and efficiency of existing reporting requirements in order to identify areas that may be simplified or streamlined.
Read more. -
EU Technical Standards On Homogeneity Conditions For STS Securitizations
11/06/2019
Regulatory Technical Standards under the EU Securitization Regulation on the conditions for a securitization to be considered "homogenous" have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Homogeneity is one of the requirements for a securitization to be classed as a simple, transparent and standardized securitization or STS securitization. Exposures related to STS securitizations will attract lower risk weightings for firms subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation. The RTS will apply directly across the EU from November 26, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Considers Key Supervisory and Policy Initiatives
10/31/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met on October 30-31, 2019 to discuss key policy and supervisory issues, including: (i) a proposed consultation on adjustments to the credit valuation adjustment risk framework; (ii) a proposed consultation on revised market risk and sovereign exposure disclosure requirements; (iii) a proposed discussion paper on the prudential treatment of cryptoassets; (iv) a proposed consultation on guidelines for enhanced cooperation between prudential regulatory authorities and anti-money laundering/counter-terrorism financing authorities; and (v) its reports into the implementation of the Net Stable Funding Ratio and large exposures standards in Argentina and China. All of the proposed consultation papers, as well as the NSFR/large exposures reports, are expected to be published in November 2019.
Other topics under discussion included benchmark rate reforms, the implementation of the Basel Committee's guidance on managing foreign exchange settlement risk and the usability of capital buffers. On the latter subject, the Basel Committee has also published a newsletter reiterating the importance of the capital buffer framework and emphasizing that the buffers are designed to be usable. The Basel Committee has announced that Canada will host the 21 International Conference of Banking Supervisors on October 21-22, 2020.
View the Basel Committee's press release on its October 30-31 2019 meeting.
View the Basel Committee's newsletter on capital buffers.
View details of the 21 International Conference of Banking Supervisors. -
European Banking Authority Urges EU Legislative Update for Cross-Border Banking and Payment Services in the Digital Era
10/29/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a report identifying potential barriers to customer choice and the cross-border provision of banking and payment services in the EU, together with proposals for how to overcome these issues. Building on the EBA's FinTech Roadmap and the European Commissioner's Consumer Financial Services Action Plan, the report sets out the areas where the institutions, including FinTech firms, may face challenges when seeking to provide intra-EU cross-border services, focusing on authorizations and licensing, consumer protection and conduct of business requirements and anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism. The EBA makes recommendations for where changes to EU primary legislation or further guidelines could address the issues to enhance the EU's single market.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Launches Consultation on More Proportionate Capital Requirements for Credit Unions
10/24/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on the capital requirements that apply to credit unions. The PRA considers that credit unions approaching the thresholds of £10 million in assets or 15,000 members may find barriers to expansion under the current capital regime. It also finds that the risks that the capital regime endeavours to tackle could be addressed in a simpler manner than the link between capital and credit union membership size and activity which is currently used. The PRA also considers that engaging with small credit unions earlier could increase chances of a non-failure solution.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Opinion on Regulatory Treatment of Non-Performing Exposure Securitizations
10/23/2019
The European Banking Authority has published an opinion recommending amendments to the regulatory treatment of the securitization of non-performing exposures. The opinion examines how securitizations may be used to fund the reduction of NPEs and outlines regulatory constraints imposed on the use of securitizations in this way, alongside its proposals for amendments to the regulatory framework.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates Asks Regulators to Act on Prudential Impediments to LIBOR Transition
10/23/2019
The Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates has written to the Prudential Regulation Authority raising issues in the banking prudential regulation regime that, in its view, will require changes and/or regulatory forbearance if a smooth transition from LIBOR to SONIA is to be achieved. Although the letter focuses on the U.K. regime, the issues are likely to be relevant globally.
Read more. -
European Commission Consults on Alternative Standardized Approach for Market Risk
10/22/2019
The European Commission has invited responses to its consultation on proposed changes to the standardized approach for market risk. The changes follow the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s revisions to the Basel III market risk capital framework, which were published in January 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Launches Consultation on Supervision of Liquidity and Funding Risk
10/17/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on proposed amendments to its Supervisory Statement, “The PRA’s approach to supervising liquidity and funding risk”. The amendments are intended to clarify the appropriate use of the Bank of England’s liquidity facilities and the credibility of recovery plans that rely on such facilities.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Technical Standards for Public Disclosures under CRR II
10/16/2019
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on its draft Implementing Technical Standards for public disclosures by financial institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. CRR implements the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, which require relevant financial institutions to disclose information about their risks and risk management procedures and policies. In 2018, the Basel Committee published updated Pillar 3 requirements. The revised CRR was published in June 2019 and, for the most part, will apply directly across the EU from June 28, 2021. It incorporates the revised Basel Committee disclosure standards into CRR and mandates the EBA to produce the draft ITS to ensure comparability of the disclosures made with international non-EU active banks. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by January 16, 2020. The EBA expects to submit the revised draft ITS to the European Commission in June 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Consultation on Structural FX Guidelines Under Capital Requirements Regulation
10/16/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation on its proposed guidelines on the implementation of the structural FX position contemplated by the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR requires institutions to calculate their net open positions in currencies according to specified formulae, but permits institutions to exclude positions that have been taken for hedging purposes and that are of a structural nature.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Technical Standards for Supervisory Reporting Requirements under CRR II
10/16/2019
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on its draft Implementing Technical Standards for financial institutions’ reporting requirements under the revised Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft ITS will amend the existing reporting regime applicable to banks subject to the CRR, taking into account certain amendments to that regime made by CRR 2 and the “Backstop Regulation”. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by January 16, 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Report on Implementation of G20 Financial Regulatory Reforms
10/16/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published its annual report on the 2019 progress made in the implementation of the G20’s financial reforms. The FSB published an interim progress report in June 2019 at the meeting of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in Japan, which summarized FSB member jurisdictions’ progress to date in implementing the recommended reforms. The annual report provides further detail on the progress made and sets out areas for future work.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Report on Progress of Over-The-Counter Derivatives Market Reforms
10/15/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a report on the progress its member jurisdictions have made in 2019 on the implementation of agreed G20 reforms to over-the-counter derivatives markets. The report finds that there has been limited additional implementation of the reforms since the FSB’s 2018 report.
Read more. -
UK Rules to Implement France's Large Exposure Limit for Highly Indebted Corporates
10/15/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement and final rules to reciprocate the French measure on large exposures, following a recommendation by the European Systemic Risk Board. In July 2018, France's Haut Conseil de stabilité financière (HCSF) imposed a measure under the Capital Requirements Regulation that lowers the large exposure limit, from 25% to 5% of a firm's eligible capital, for French G-SIIs and French O-SIIs for their exposures to French non-financial counterparties that are 'highly indebted'. The PRA will apply the same 5% large exposure limit for exposures to certain French NFCs through amendments to the Large Exposures part of the PRA Rulebook. The measures apply on a consolidated basis to U.K. firms identified by the PRA as Global Systemically Important Institutions and Other Systemically Important Institutions from January 1, 2020.
View the PRA rules.
View the PRA Policy Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Report on Progress of Over-The-Counter Derivatives Market Reforms
10/15/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a report on the progress its member jurisdictions have made in implementing the agreed G20 reforms to over-the-counter derivatives markets in 2018. The report finds that good progress has been made in implementation of the agenda.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Update on Market Fragmentation Work
10/14/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a progress update on its ongoing work to tackle market fragmentation. The update follows the FSB’s June 2019 Report on Market Fragmentation, which explored the link between market fragmentation and financial stability and identified four areas for further work to address the issue: deference (e.g. the reliance authorities place on one another when regulating or supervising participants on a cross-border basis); pre-positioning of capital and liquidity; regulatory and supervisory coordination and information-sharing; and market fragmentation as part of the evaluation of reforms, starting with the “too-big-to-fail” evaluation.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Letter to G20 Ministers on Effect of Reforms and Future Work
10/13/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a letter to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors describing the progress of post-financial crisis reforms and key focus areas for the future. Over the past ten years, the FSB has proposed a number of reforms to the global financial system, working with international organizations on implementation to improve financial stability.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Implements New Waiver of Deposit Protection Rules
10/13/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has announced that it will provide a new waiver by consent of the Continuity of Access Rules under the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook. The DPP Rulebook sets out rules requiring firms to ensure that eligible depositors have access to deposits covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event of the firm’s insolvency, by establishing systems to facilitate a transfer of such deposits (the so-called “Continuity of Access” rules).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Implementing Final Basel III Reforms
10/11/2019
The European Commission has launched a public consultation on aligning the EU rules on capital requirements to certain final outstanding elements of the Basel III international standards. On December 7, 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the last part of the Basel III reforms. The revisions were to the standardized approach and the Internal Ratings-Based approach for credit risk, the Credit Valuation Adjustment risk framework, the leverage ratio framework, including the introduction of a leverage buffer for Global Systemically Important Banks, the operational risk framework and the new output ratio floor. It was agreed that the revised standards would be implemented from January 1, 2022, except that the output floor would be phased-in until January 1, 2027. The Commission's consultation closes on January 3, 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Brexit: European Banking Authority Again Warns Against Letter-Box Entities
10/08/2019
The European Banking Authority has issued a further Communication on issues associated with the U.K.'s withdrawal from the EU, scheduled to take place on October 31, 2019. The EBA notes that financial institutions have made progress on their preparations for a no-deal Brexit. However, national regulators have highlighted concerns about the operationalization of relocation plans and customer communication. In particular, national regulators have noted that in some cases authorization has been obtained, but it remains unclear whether the firm has transferred assets, skilled staff and risk function to fully operationalize the new business. The EBA reminds firms of the principles it set out in its October 2017 Opinion on structures, and particularly the need for firms not to set up so-called "empty shells".
Read more. -
Eurozone Supervisory Priorities for 2020
10/07/2019
The European Central Bank's Banking Supervision arm has published the 2020 supervisory priorities of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and a risk assessment for 2020. ECB Banking Supervision has identified the following risks to the euro banking sector: (i) economic, political and debt sustainability challenges in the euro area; (ii) business model sustainability; (iii) cybercrime; (iv) execution risk related to banks' strategies for non-performing loans; (v) easing lending standards; (vi) repricing in financial markets; (vii) misconduct, money laundering and terrorism financing; (viii) Brexit; (ix) global outlook and geopolitical uncertainties; (x) reaction to regulation; and (xi) climate-change related risk.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Issues Statement on Liquidity of Euro Area Banks
10/07/2019
The European Central Bank has issued a statement on the results of its 2019 supervisory stress test. The European Central Bank is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. It found that the vast majority of banks directly supervised by the ECB have overall comfortable liquidity positions, although there were some vulnerabilities that required further attention.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Basel III Capital Monitoring Report and Update on EU Bank Liquidity Measures
10/02/2019
The European Banking Authority has published two reports reviewing the impact of the EU’s implementation of the Basel III capital monitoring reforms and Capital Requirements Regulation liquidity measures. The EBA estimates that once the Basel III reforms are fully implemented, EU banks’ Tier 1 minimum required capital will have increased by an average of 19.3%. Liquidity coverage ratios, meanwhile, averaged roughly 149% in December 2018, significantly above the minimum threshold of 100% set out in the CRR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Launches Consultation on Asset Encumbrance Rules
09/30/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on its proposed expectations of how firms manage prudential risks associated with asset encumbrance. The PRA’s expectations are relevant to all PRA-authorized firms, other than credit unions and insurance firms. Responses should be submitted by January 17, 2020.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Strategic Focus Areas for 2020
09/27/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its 2020 Work Programme. The Programme details six strategic areas of focus for 2020 and these are:
- Support the development of the risk reduction package and the implementation of the global standards in the EU. The EBA will work on developing level 2 legislation required by the revised Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive, the revised Bank Recovery & Resolution Directive and the new Covered Bonds Directive and Investment Firm Regulation and related Directive (the latter two have not yet entered into force). The EBA will continue to work on the implementation of the market risk requirements, following the finalization of the Basel Committee on Banking Standard's fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB). In particular, in 2020, the EBA anticipates implementing the reporting requirement and certain aspects of the FRTB revisions for the internal model approach and for the treatment of non-trading book positions subject to FX or commodity risk. Another priority will be finalization of the EBA's roadmap for the internal ratings-based approach for calculating minimum capital requirements for credit risk.
- Providing efficient methodologies and tools for supervisory convergence and stress testing. The EBA intends to consult on Pillar 2 changes during 2020 and will conduct the 2020 stress test for EU banks.
-
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Credit Risk
09/18/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on its approach to implementing the European Banking Authority's Technical Standards and Guidelines on Probability of Default estimation, Loss Given Default estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the Internal Ratings Based approach to credit risk. The consultation is relevant to U.K. banks, building societies and PRA-designated U.K. investment firms. Responses to the consultation need to be submitted by December 18, 2019.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Implements New Waiver of Deposit Protection Rules
09/13/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has announced that it will provide a new waiver by consent of the Continuity of Access Rules under the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook. The DPP Rulebook sets out rules requiring firms to ensure that eligible depositors have access to deposits covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event of the firm’s insolvency, by establishing systems to facilitate a transfer of such deposits (the so-called “Continuity of Access” rules).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Clarification on Legacy Own Funds Instruments Coming in Mid-2020
09/09/2019
The European Banking Authority has announced that it will clarify by mid-2020 the position of instruments that were both issued and qualified as "own funds" for capital purposes before December 31, 2011. When the Capital Requirements Regulation entered into force, transitional provisions provided that these legacy instruments would also qualify as own funds instruments under the CRR, even if they did not meet the enhanced requirements for own funds introduced in that measure. The transitional period for such instruments ends on December 31, 2021. The EBA has stated that it will provide clarification on the appropriate treatment of the legacy instruments to ensure that banks maintain high quality regulatory capital and that the rules are consistently applied across the EU. The EBA confirms that it will take into account recent changes to own funds requirements in CRR II as well as other linked changes under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive.
View the EBA's announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Proposes Amendments to the Pre-Issuance Notification Rules for Regulatory Capital Instruments
09/09/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper in which it proposes amendments to the Pre-Issuance Notification (PIN) requirements for regulatory capital instruments. The PIN requirements are applicable to PRA-authorized Capital Requirements Regulation firms and require firms to notify the PRA of certain capital instruments that they intend to issue. The PRA assesses the terms and conditions of these instruments prior to issuance, to ensure that firms maintain quality capital resources which comply with CRR. Responses to the consultation are requested by December 9, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Writes to Banks on Prudential Supervision of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks
09/05/2019
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a "Dear CEO" letter sent to all PRA-regulated banks and investment firms (firms that are subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation) on the prudential supervision of money laundering and terrorist financing risks. The PRA reminds firms of the Opinion published by the European Banking Authority on July 24, 2019, which invited national prudential supervisors to (i) make clear to institutions the expectation that prudential supervisors should be aware of AML/CTF risks that may affect the institutions they oversee; and (ii) notify institutions that AML/CTF concerns will be taken into account in determining prudential supervision.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Amends Its Supervisory Expectations on Non-Performing Loans
08/22/2019
Following the coming into force on April 26, 2019 of an EU regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation that introduced a statutory prudential backstop, and requires banks to have minimum loan loss coverage for newly originated loans, the European Central Bank has published a communication on supervisory coverage expectations for non-performing loans. The ECB communication announces that the ECB has revised its supervisory expectations on NPLs that it published in its March 2018 Addendum to the Guidance for Eurozone banks on NPLs as a result of the Amending Regulation. Neither the Guidance nor the Addendum are legally binding, but both apply to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Advice on EU Implementation of Basel III
08/05/2019
The European Banking Authority has published several documents setting out its advice to the European Commission on the impact and implementation in the EU of the Basel III 2017 reforms. On December 7, 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the last part of the Basel III reforms. The revisions were to the standardized approach and the Internal Ratings-Based approach for credit risk, the Credit Valuation Adjustment risk framework, the leverage ratio framework, including the introduction of a leverage buffer for Global Systemically Important Banks, the operational risk framework and the new output ratio floor. The revised standards take effect from January 1, 2022, except that the output floor may be phased-in until January 1, 2027.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Draft Guidelines for Capital Requirements Regulation Contractual Payments
07/31/2019
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on its proposed guidelines on the methodology used to determine the weighted average maturity of contractual payments due under securitization transaction tranches for the purposes of the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes, amongst other things, the principles by which firms should calculate their credit risk, including in relation to securitization transactions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Credit Rating Equivalence Decisions Repealed for Some; Reaffirmed for Others
07/30/2019
A series of Implementing Decisions on the equivalence with the EU Credit Rating Agencies Regulation of the credit rating regimes of certain non-EU countries have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The EU CRA Regulation provides that banks, investment firms, insurers, reinsurers, management companies, investment companies, alternative investment fund managers and CCPs may only use credit ratings for certain regulatory purposes if a rating is issued by: (i) an EU CRA registered with the European Securities and Markets Authority; (ii) a third-country CRA under the endorsement regime; or (iii) a third-country CRA under the equivalence/certification regime. Equivalence decisions for several jurisdictions were adopted in 2012 under the CRA Regulation, as it was at the time. The equivalence decisions were for Brazil, Canada, Argentina, Singapore, Australia, Mexico, the U.S., Japan and Hong Kong. CRAs from Mexico, the U.S. and Japan subsequently obtained certification from ESMA.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Opinion on Relation of Prudential Objectives to Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing
07/24/2019
The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion signaling the importance of money laundering and terrorism financing risks in the prudential supervision of EU Member States. The Opinion invites national prudential supervisors to make clear to institutions in their jurisdictions the expectation that prudential supervisors should be aware of AML/CTF risks that may affect the institutions they oversee.
Read more. -
UK Regulator Publishes Policy Statement on Eligibility of Financial Collateral Under Capital Requirements Regulation
07/23/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published the final version of its amended Supervisory Statement on credit risk mitigation, providing additional clarity on the eligibility of financial collateral under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Supervisory Statement is published alongside the PRA's Policy Statement, which provides feedback on the responses to the PRA's consultation paper on the same topic launched in January this year. The amendments to the Supervisory Statement are effective as of July 23, 2019, the date the Policy Statement is published. Firms with concerns about their ability to comply with the revised Supervisory Statement are advised to liaise with their usual supervisory contacts.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Consults on Changes to Counterparty Credit Risk Treatment
07/23/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has issued a consultation on proposed additions to its Supervisory Statement on counterparty credit risk. The additions are intended to provide clarity to the market on how firms should satisfy the Capital Requirements Regulation's requirement to ensure senior management are aware of the limitations and assumptions included in models used to calculate exposure values for derivatives. The consultation is relevant to all firms captured by the provisions of the Capital Requirements Directive. Responses to the consultation are requested by October 25, 2019.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Reports on Regulatory Perimeter, Regulatory Status and Authorization of Fintech Activities
07/18/2019
Fulfilling its mandate under the European Commission's FinTech Action Plan to map the current authorization and licensing approaches for innovative FinTech business models in Europe, the European Banking Authority has published a report on the regulatory perimeter, regulatory status and authorization of FinTech activities under its remit, in particular the banking, payment services and electronic money services sectors. The European Securities and Markets Authority published its related report on July 12, 2019.
Read more. -
UK Proposes Rules to Implement France's Large Exposure Limit for Highly Indebted Corporates
07/16/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposals to reciprocate the French measure on large exposures, following a recommendation by the European Systemic Risk Board. In July 2018, France's Haut Conseil de stabilité financière (HCSF) imposed a measure under the Capital Requirements Regulation that lowers the large exposure limit, from 25% to 5% of a firm's eligible capital, for French G-SIIs and French O-SIIs for their exposures to French NFCs that are 'highly indebted'.
The PRA is proposing to apply the same 5% large exposure limit for exposures to certain French NFCs through amendments to the Large Exposures part of the PRA Rulebook. The proposals would apply to Global Systemically Important Institutions and Other Systemically Important Institutions from January 1, 2020.
Responses to the consultation should be submitted to the PRA by September 6, 2019.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Recommended Legal Action Plan for Transition from EONIA to €STR
07/16/2019
Following its consultation earlier this year, the working group charged with implementing the European market's move away from EONIA, has published a recommended legal action plan for new and legacy contracts referencing EONIA. The implementation of the recommended legal measures is intended to address issues arising from the transition from EONIA to the euro short-term rate (known as €STR). €STR is a risk-free rate and, with a fixed spread, will replace EONIA as a reference rate in a variety of euro-denominated financial contracts, including derivatives, collateral remuneration for derivatives and cash products such as commercial paper, repurchase agreements and default interest payable under syndicated loans.
Read more. -
European Commission Highlights Areas for Further Analysis in Basel III Reforms
07/15/2019
The Director General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union of the European Commission has written to the European Banking Authority highlighting areas where further analysis is required on the impact and implementation of the Basel III reforms in the EU. The EBA is in the process of finalizing its advice to the European Commission on the impact within the EU of the implementation of the Basel III reforms to credit risk, operational risk, output floor and securities financing transactions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Provides Guidance to Aide Convergent Implementation of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio in the EU
07/12/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its first report on its monitoring of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio implementation in the EU. The LCR has applied as a 100% minimum binding standard across the EU since January 1, 2018, ahead of the Basel implementation date of January 1, 2019. The LCR requirements are set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, supplemented by the LCR Delegated Regulation (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61). The LCR Delegated Regulation allows national regulators some discretion when implementing the LCR requirements. The EBA's report sets out its observations on the implementation of the LCR, focusing on the level of divergence of implementation of the LCR across the EU. To enhance a more convergent implementation of the LCR, the EBA also provides some guidance for national regulators and banks on operational deposits, retail deposits excluded from outflows and notifications on additional liquidity outflows.
The EBA intends to continue monitoring implementation of the LCR, including the extent to which national regulators and banks apply its guidance incorporated in the report and will assess whether any more formal guidance is needed.
View the EBA's report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Progress Report on Repair of Internal Ratings Based Models
07/08/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a progress report on its 2016 roadmap designed to address concerns about the variability of own funds requirements arising from the internal models that firms use to calculate their minimum credit risk capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Seeks Feedback on Taxonomy for Sustainable Economic Activities
07/04/2019
The European Commission's Technical Expert Group on sustainable finance has launched a call for feedback on the taxonomy for sustainable economic activities. The TEG's Report on Taxonomy was published on June 18, 2019, alongside the Commission's Guidelines on reporting climate-related information, an interim TEG report on EU climate benchmarks and a TEG report on an EU green bond standard. The Report on Taxonomy links to the EU's proposed Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment.
Feedback on the TEG's Report on Taxonomy should be submitted by September 13, 2019.
View the Report on Taxonomy.
View further details on the call for feedback.
View the Commission's Guidelines on reporting climate-related information. -
European Central Bank Requests Benchmark Transition Plans from Large Eurozone Banks
07/03/2019
The Chair of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank, Andrea Enria, has written a "Dear CEO" letter to the larger Eurozone banks on their preparation for the transition from interest rate benchmarks to risk-free-rates. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB is seeking assurance from these banks that they have plans in place to address the transition from interest rate benchmarks to risk-free-rates, focusing on the transition from the Euro overnight index average, EONIA, to the Euro short-term rate - €STR - as a euro risk-free rate. EONIA will be calculated as €STR plus a fixed spread, from October 2, 2019, which is when €STR will be launched. EONIA is due to cease entirely from the beginning of 2022.
The ECB is requesting the significant Eurozone banks to provide: (i) a summary of the key risks to the reform of benchmarks; (ii) a detailed action plan on how to address those risks and pricing issues as well as implement process changes; and (iii) contact details for those at the firm overseeing the transition.
View the letter.
View details of the new EONIA methodology. -
Financial Stability Board Reports on Implementation of the TLAC Standard
07/02/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a report on the Review of the Technical Implementation of the Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Standard. The FSB conducted a review of implementation of the TLAC Standard by jurisdictions that covered the Global Systemically Important Banks to which the TLAC Standard applied as at January 1, 2019 and the home and material host jurisdictions of those G-SIBs. The focus of the review was assessing whether implementation aligns with the timelines and objectives set out in the TLAC Standard.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Revisions to Leverage Ratio Requirements
06/26/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published revisions to its standards for leverage ratio capital requirements. The revisions relate to: (i) calculations of leverage ratios for "client-cleared" derivatives; and (ii) disclosure requirements for leverage ratios.
Read more. -
Eurozone Single Resolution Board Publishes Update to MREL Policy
06/25/2019
The Eurozone Single Resolution Board has published an addendum to its 2018 policy statement on minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities. The addendum takes into account changes made as part of the EU’s “Banking Package”, published in the Official Journal of the European Union on June 7, 2019, in particular the EU’s implementation of the Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) standard by changes made under the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2).
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Launches Consultation on Revisions to Pillar 2 Liquidity Reporting Frequency
06/25/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulatory Authority has launched a consultation on amending the frequency with which firms must submit reports using the PRA’s liquidity reporting template. The obligation to make a report using the "PRA 110" template comes into force on July 1, 2019 and obliges firms with total assets equal to or greater than €30bn to report details of their liquidity on a monthly basis, or, in the event of specific liquidity or market stress, on a weekly basis.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Progress Report on G20 Financial Regulatory Reforms
06/25/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a progress report summarizing FSB member jurisdictions’ progress in implementation of the G20’s recommended financial reforms. The G20’s program of financial reforms was launched in 2009 to mend the weaknesses that led to the global financial crisis. The FSB is the body responsible for delivering the G20’s proposed changes and its latest report sets out progress made since the FSB’s last report in November 2018, as well as areas where further work is required.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Draft Methodology for 2020 EU-Wide Stress Tests
06/25/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its draft methodology, templates and template guidance for the 2020 EU-wide stress tests that will be carried out to assess EU banks' resilience to an adverse economic shock. The final methodology will be published by the end of 2019. The stress test will be launched in January 2020 and the results will be published by the end of July 2020.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Overview of Pillar 2 Practices and Approaches
06/21/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published an overview report on the Pillar 2 supervisory review process and on the different practices that regulators and legislators in Basel member jurisdictions have adopted in relation to it.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Report on the Future of the UK Financial System and the Bank's Priorities for the Future
06/20/2019
Huw van Steenis, the Bank of England financier appointed by the BoE in 2018 to review the future of the U.K. financial system, has published his "Future of Finance" report, setting out a vision for the medium-term future of the U.K. financial system and the BoE's role in supporting that. The report was based on consultations with entrepreneurs, financiers, tech firms, global investors, consumer groups, charities, policymakers and business leaders across the U.K. and overseas. In response, the BoE has published a document which sets out the actions it intends to take to deal with the challenges and opportunities identified in the report.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Discusses Supervisory Initiatives and Approves Implementation Reports
06/20/2019
Central bankers and banking supervisors of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met this week to discuss a range of policy and supervisory initiatives.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Proposes Guidelines on Loan Origination and Monitoring
06/19/2019
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring. The consultation stems from the European Council's Action Plan on tackling non-performing loans in Europe. The purpose of the guidelines is to improve the processes by which institutions grant loans and monitor them thereafter, with the overarching goal of improving the financial stability of the EU financial system.
Read more. -
UK Regulator Issues Consultation Paper on Adequate Financial Resources
06/13/2019
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a consultation paper explaining the FCA's proposed approach to minimum financial resources requirements and seeking feedback on the proposed clarifications to its stated approach. The consultation paper is relevant for all FCA solo-regulated firms subject to the FCAs's threshold conditions and/or Principles for Business. Firms should submit responses by September 13, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Publishes Fourth Progress Report on Reduction of Non-Performing Loans in Europe
06/12/2019
The European Commission has published its fourth progress report on the reduction of non-performing loans in Europe. The report describes the impact of the EU's measures to tackle NPLs, which stem from the European Council's "Action Plan to Tackle NPLs in Europe". The Action Plan was designed to reduce risk in the European banking sector. As part of this project, the European Commission launched a package of legislative and non-legislative measures designed to address the build-up of non-performing loans seen in the years following the financial crisis.
Read more. -
European Commission Publishes Progress Report on European Economic Monetary Union
06/12/2019
The European Commission has published a report on progress made in Europe since the publication of "The Five Presidents' Report" of 2015, in which five of the EU's key figures set out their agenda for deepening the EU's Economic and Monetary Union. The report is published ahead of the Euro Summit on June 21, 2019, where EU leaders will meet to review progress in tackling the challenges faced by the EU.
Read more. -
European Commission Updates Credit Rating Agencies Regulation Equivalence Decisions
06/11/2019
The European Commission has published a series of draft Implementing Decisions on the equivalence with the EU Credit Rating Agencies Regulation of the credit rating regimes of certain non-EU countries. The Implementing Decisions for Brazil, Canada, Argentina, Singapore and Australia repeal the existing equivalence decisions of the credit rating legislation in these countries, stripping these regimes of their equivalent status. The Implementing Decisions for Mexico, the US, Japan and Hong Kong confirm the equivalence of such countries' credit rating legislation.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Offers Modification of UK Capital Rules Reflecting Changes to Capital Requirements Regulation II
06/10/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a draft modification of its capital rules to correspond with changes made to the Capital Requirements Regulation II that will apply directly in Member States from June 27, 2019. Firms wishing to benefit from the modified rules should apply to the Authorisations Division of the PRA.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Consultation on Impact of Regulatory Reforms for SME Financing
06/07/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a consultation paper on the effects of post-financial crisis regulatory reforms on financing for small- and medium-sized enterprises. The FSB’s analysis suggests that there have not been material or persistent negative effects on SME financing, although some evidence suggests the more stringent Basel III capital requirements may have slowed the pace and tightened the conditions of SME lending at the least capitalized banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Capital Requirements Directive V and Capital Requirements Regulation II Finalized
06/07/2019
The legislative amendments to the EU's Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, widely referred to as "CRD5" or "CRR2", have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Subject to certain exceptions, the Regulation amending CRR will apply directly across the EU from June 28, 2021. EU Member States are required to transpose the Directive amending CRD into their national laws and to apply those provisions from December 29, 2020, subject to certain exceptions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Revisions to EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive Finalized
06/07/2019
A new Directive amending the EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, widely referred to as "BRRD2", has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Read more. -
European Systemic Risk Board Committee Publishes Report on Regulatory Complexity Risks
06/04/2019
The European Systemic Risk Board's Advisory Scientific Committee has published a report on the risks of excessive regulatory complexity. The report considers the key drivers of regulatory complexity, the risks it entails and sets out seven principles designed to prioritize regulatory robustness, upon which it argues the design and reform of financial regulation should be based.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Launches Common Supervisory Action on MiFID II Appropriateness Rules
06/03/2019
The European Securities and Markets Authority has announced that it will launch a common supervisory action in the second half of 2019 on the application of the appropriateness requirements under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The action will be undertaken as part of ESMA's mandate to build a culture of common supervision among EU national regulators.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Consults on Resolution-Related Disclosures and Solvent Wind-Down of Derivatives and Trading Portfolios
06/03/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published two consultation papers on: (i) Public Disclosure of Resolution Planning and Resolvability; and (ii) Solvent Wind-down of Derivatives and Trading Portfolios. The first consultation paper focuses on disclosures made by financial institutions on their resolution planning and resolvability during “peace time” (i.e., times when there is no resolution commencing or in progress). The second consultation paper focuses on considerations that national regulators and global systemically important banks should take into account when commencing the solvent wind-down of a G-SIB’s derivative and trading book activities.
Read more. -
EONIA Methodology and One-Off Spread Confirmed
05/31/2019
The European Money Markets Institute has adopted the EONIA working group's proposed methodology for calculating EONIA's replacement rate. The new methodology, dubbed "€STR" (or the "Euro short term rate"), will take effect as of October 2, 2019. In line with the adoption of the €STR, the European Central Bank has calculated the average risk spread between the new €STR and the existing EONIA rate as 0.0085% (8.5 basis points). The spread will be used for a limited period to calculate an adjusted EONIA rate for all existing contracts which continue to reference EONIA following the introduction of the €STR in October 2019.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Delivers Report on Crypto-Assets
05/31/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published a report on crypto-assets outlining the actions being undertaken by various international organizations in response to the challenges posed by crypto-assets and the FSB's own proposed course of action for the year ahead. The report will be delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors at the next G20 meeting in Japan on June 8-9, 2019.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Reports on Progress to Address Correspondent Banking Declines
05/29/2019
The Financial Stability Board has published two reports as an update on the work to address correspondent banking declines - the "FSB Action Plan to Assess and Address the Decline in Correspondent Banking - Progress Report" and "Remittance Service Providers' Access to Banking Services: Monitoring of the FSB's Recommendations".
Read more. -
EU Technical Standards on Authorization of Third-Party Firms Assessing STS Status of Securitizations
05/29/2019
A Commission Delegated Regulation specifying Regulatory Technical Standards on the applicable requirements for third party entities seeking authorization as providers of STS verification services has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS supplement the Securitization Regulation (also known as the STS Regulation), which has applied directly across the EU since January 1, 2019. The Securitization Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as "simple, transparent and standardized" (STS) securitizations and requires originators and sponsors to notify the European Securities and Markets Authority when a securitization meets the STS criteria. ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website. The Securitization Regulation allows (but does not require) originators, sponsors and securitization special purpose entities to use third-party firms to assess whether a securitization meets the STS criteria, provided that those firms are authorized by the relevant national regulator. The new RTS set out what the application for authorization should cover, which includes information on the entities' organizational structure, operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance and conflicts of interest.
The RTS will apply directly across the EU from June 18, 2019.
View the RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Confirms 2019 Focus
05/29/2019
The European Banking Authority has published its annual report for 2018, setting out details of the work it undertook in 2018 and its focus areas in 2019. The EBA will, in 2019, focus on: (i) finalizing the guidelines on loan origination as part of its contribution to tackling non-performing loans in the EU; (ii) implementing the changes arising from the revised Capital Requirements Regulation, which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on June 7, 2019; (iii) implementing the new Investment Firm Regulation and Directive by preparing various technical standards, guidelines and reports; (iv) preparing technical standards and guidelines, as required under the EU Securitization Regulation, that facilitate the use of internal models for banks investing in securitization positions; (v) assisting with the EU's implementation of Basel IV; (vi) the impact of FinTech, in particular, on payment institutions' and e-money institutions' business models; (vii) identifying regulatory and supervisory areas affected by the use of big data and developing best practices and principles for the application and implementation of data analytics by institutions; (viii) continuing to assess the risks of crypto-assets; (ix) supporting the European Commission's work on sustainable finance; and (x) improving the supervision of anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing.
View the EBA's annual report 2018. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Draft Implementing Technical Standards For Supervisory Reporting under the Capital Requirements Regulation
05/28/2019
The European Banking Authority has published draft Implementing Technical Standards for supervisory reporting, which make changes to the existing reporting obligations of EU banks (credit institutions) and investment firms. The majority of the technical standards will apply from March 2020, with the exception of the liquidity coverage requirements, which will apply from April 2020.
Read more. -
European Commission Adopts Technical Standards on Homogeneity Conditions for STS Securitizations
05/28/2019
The European Commission has adopted draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the EU Securitization Regulation on the conditions for a securitization to be considered homogenous. Homogeneity is one of the requirements for a securitization to be classed as a simple, transparent and standardized securitization or STS securitization. Exposures related to STS securitizations will attract lower risk weightings for firms subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation. The new EU securitization framework has applied across the EU since January 1, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Consultation on Proposed Amendments to Technical Standards Under the Capital Requirements Regulation
05/24/2019
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a consultation paper in which it proposes amending the Implementing Technical Standards that specify the main indices and recognized exchanges for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646). CRR requires a bank to hold sufficient capital to cover the risks associated with its business and prescribes how the credit risks of collateral should be treated. Securities that will be regarded as eligible as collateral are equities and convertible bonds that are constituents of a main index and debt securities that are listed on a recognized exchange. ESMA's consultation relates to the ITS setting out the main indices and recognized exchanges.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Consults on Impact of the Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms
05/23/2019
The Financial Stability Board has begun its evaluation of the post-2008 financial crisis reforms on banks that were deemed "too big to fail", publishing the summary terms of reference. The evaluation will consider whether the implemented reforms are reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important banks (or SIBs). The FSB is also asking for feedback from financial institutions and other stakeholders on the impact of these reforms. In particular, the FSB is seeking input on how the reforms have achieved their objectives, the impact of the reforms on SIBs, whether the impact differs for different types of banks, the impact of the reforms on financial system resilience and whether there are any unintended consequences of the reforms. The FSB asks those submitting responses to provide evidence, where possible. Responses should be submitted by June 21, 2019. The FSB intends to use the responses to prepare a draft report on the impact, which would be issued for consultation in June 2020. The final report is expected by the end of 2020.
View the summary terms of reference.
View the request for feedback. -
Proposed EU Templates for Reporting of Intra-Group Transactions by Financial Conglomerates
05/22/2019
The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities has launched a consultation on draft Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration for financial conglomerates under the Financial Conglomerates Directive. FICOD sets out requirements for regulated entities to report at least annually all significant intra-group transactions of regulated entities within a financial conglomerate and for information sharing between relevant regulators of conglomerates.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Authority Opinion on Equivalence of Argentina's Prudential Requirements
05/22/2019
The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion opining that the prudential supervisory and regulatory requirements in Argentina are equivalent to the EU's requirements as set out in the Capital Requirements. The EBA provided its Opinion and formal assessment for Argentina to the Commission in November 2018. However, the documents have only now been published, at the request of the Commission. An equivalence decision for Argentina by the European Commission was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on April 1, 2019. The equivalence decision means that EU banks may apply preferential risk weights and hold less regulatory capital for their exposures to Argentinian banks, investment firms, clearing houses, CCPs, exchanges as well as the Argentinian government, central bank and public bodies, including any intragroup exposures of EU subsidiaries of Argentinian banks. Such an equivalence decision under CRR is one of the factors that a national regulator must take into account when deciding whether to adopt a domestic equivalence decision on consolidated supervision under the Capital Requirements Directive (i.e. whether to exercise consolidated supervision under EU rules to non-EU parents).
View the Opinion.
View the EBA's assessment.
View details of the equivalence decision for Argentina.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Supervisory Authorities Finalize Proposed Revisions to Implementing Technical Standards for Mapping of External Credit Ratings
05/20/2019
The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities has published a Final Report and final draft amending Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of External Credit Assessment Institutions' credit assessments under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Joint Committee comprises the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The publication of the Final Report follows the consultation conducted by the ESAs between October 26, 2018 and December 31, 2018.
Read more. -
EONIA Working Group Seeks Feedback on Implementation of Euro Risk-Free Rates
05/15/2019
The working group charged with implementing the European market's move away from EONIA, the current reference rate used in euro-denominated financial contracts, has published a consultation paper setting out its "Legal Action Plan" for transitioning to the chosen new euro short-term rate. The current consultation paper focuses on how the new rate should be incorporated into both new and existing financial contracts so as to ensure a swift and smooth transition from EONIA. The paper seeks feedback from market participants on its proposals. Responses should be sent by June 12, 2019.
Read more. -
European Commission Investigates Anti-Competitive EU Loan Syndication
05/05/2019
A report examining competition within the European syndicated loan market has been published, following a call by the European Commission for an examination of the sector. The report was prepared at the request of the Commission by consultancy firm Europe Economics with input from boutique competition law firm Euclid Law.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Technical Standards for Counterparty Credit Risk
05/02/2019The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on the Regulatory Technical Standards that it is developing to govern certain aspects of counterparty credit risk in derivatives transactions. The EBA has been mandated to produce the RTS under the current draft of the Capital Requirements Regulation 2. The consultation runs until August 2, 2019. A public hearing will also take place at the EBA premises in Paris on June 17, 2019 from 15:00 - 17:00 CET. Parties interested in attending should register by May 28, 2019.
Read more. -
US Federal Reserve Proposes Broadened Application of US Netting Provisions
05/02/2019
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has proposed amendments to Regulation EE, which implements the netting provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991. The proposed amendments would expand the definition of “financial institution” for purposes of the netting provisions to more clearly cover certain categories of entities and would clarify how the activities-based test under Regulation EE applies following the consolidation of legal entities.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Sets Out 2019 Systemic Risk Buffer Rates
05/01/2019
The Prudential Regulation Authority has released its first systemic risk buffer rates, which will apply from August 1, 2019. The rates determine the amount of additional regulatory capital which must be held by "systemic risk buffer institutions" (i.e. U.K. financial institutions which have been deemed to be systemically important). In scope firms are the so-called "ring-fenced bodies" within the meaning in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and include large building societies holding more than £25bn in deposits. The buffer applicable to each institution is intended to reflect the relative costs to the U.K. economy if the institution in question were to fall into distress.
Read more. -
New EU Requirements On Minimum Loan Loss Coverage For Newly Originated Loans
04/25/2019
An EU Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation introducing a statutory prudential backstop, and requiring banks to have minimum loan loss coverage for newly originated loans, has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Amending Regulation is part of the package of legislative and non-legislative measures proposed by the European Commission in March 2018 to address remaining and future non-performing loans in the EU.
The Amending Regulation builds on existing CRR provisions, requiring a deduction from own funds where non-performing exposures are not sufficiently covered. The Amending Regulation establishes a set of conditions for the classification of NPLs, which builds on the existing framework in the existing Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting. It also makes provision for different levels of stringency depending on whether an exposure is collateralized or not and on the reason for the classification of an exposure as non-performing. National regulators will be able to use their supervisory powers under the Capital Requirements Directive to address situations in which a bank's NPLs are insufficiently covered by the backstop.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Evaluation of Bank of England's Stress Testing Program
04/24/2019
The Independent Evaluation Office (the Bank of England's independent review body) has published its evaluation of the BoE's approach to concurrent stress testing of the U.K. banking system. It concluded that overall the BoE has delivered on its stated approach and that the tests are valued highly by policymakers. The IEO has, however, outlined opportunities for refinement in three key areas, which the BoE has confirmed it is committed to implementing.
In the wake of the global financial crisis, the BoE reviewed its stress testing policy for the U.K. banking system and in 2015 published its approach to "concurrent" stress testing (the practice of simultaneously testing the entire balance sheets of several banks) up to 2018. The BoE's approach includes two scenarios: the annual cyclical scenario, a countercyclical scenario in which the severity of the scenario increases as risks build, and the biennial exploratory scenario, probing risks not linked to the financial cycle.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Statements on Managing Climate Change Risks
04/15/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement and related Supervisory Statement on enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change. The statements are in response to the PRA’s consultation paper published in 2018 which sought feedback on the draft Supervisory Statement. The Statements are relevant to all U.K. insurance and reinsurance firms, banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms.
Read more. -
European Securities and Markets Authority Publishes Supervisory Briefing on MiFID II Appropriateness Rules
04/04/2019
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published an updated version of its supervisory briefing on appropriateness. The original appropriateness briefing was published in December 2012 to provide guidance to EU national regulators on the appropriateness requirements under the original Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The updated appropriateness briefing reflects the amended requirements introduced by the revised Directive or MiFID II and takes into account the new version of ESMA's suitability guidelines published in May 2018 to the extent they are relevant to the appropriateness rules.
Read more. -
EU Equivalence for Argentina's Prudential and Regulatory Requirements
04/01/2019
An equivalence decision on the prudential and regulatory requirements in Argentina has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The equivalence decision means that EU banks may apply preferential risk weights and hold less regulatory capital for their exposures to Argentinian banks, investment firms, clearing houses, CCPs and exchanges as well as the Argentinian government, central bank and public bodies. Such an equivalence decision under CRR is one of the factors that a national regulator must take into account when deciding whether to adopt a domestic equivalence decision on consolidated supervision under the Capital Requirements Directive (i.e. whether to exercise consolidated supervision under EU rules to non-EU parents).
View the equivalence decision.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Communication on Progress on Building the Capital Markets Union
03/15/2019
The European Commission has published its latest progress report on building of the Capital Markets Union. The CMU is an EU initiative which aims to deepen and further integrate the capital markets of Member States, further safeguard financial stability, strengthen the international role of the euro and diversify sources of finances for small and medium enterprises. The CMU aims to allow consumers to buy cheaper and better investment products, and enable financial services providers to scale up by offering services in other Member States.
The progress report notes that the CMU is an important Single Market project that will give increased access to capital for both companies and citizens, especially in smaller countries. A well-developed CMU increases the EU’s attractiveness to foreign investment and complements the EU’s agenda of free and fair trade. Broadly, the Commission has delivered measures that it had committed to take forwards at the beginning of the mandate and put in place certain "building blocks" of the CMU. However, the report notes that it may take time for the impact of the Commission’s actions to be realized.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Changes to Pillar 2 Capital Requirements
03/13/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has opened a consultation proposing changes to the Pillar 2 capital requirements for banks and large investment firms.
Responses to the consultation may be submitted until June 13, 2019. The PRA is proposing to implement the changes from October 1, 2019.
The Pillar 2 capital for firms comprises Pillar 2A and Pillar 2B. Pillar 2A is a firm's capital requirement for certain risks, including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, counterparty credit risk, credit concentration risk and interest rate risk in the non-trading book. Pillar 2B is the PRA's buffer for each firm, in addition to the buffers required under the Capital Requirements Directive. The PRA's proposals relate to changes needed to its approach to setting the Pillar 2B buffer as a result of the Bank of England's changes to the stress testing framework. The proposals also aim to: (i) clarify the PRA's approach to assessing weaknesses in risk management and governance under Pillar 2B; and (ii) explain the process for updating the benchmarks used to calculate the Pillar 2A requirement for credit risk.
The changes would be implemented by updates to:- Statement of Policy, "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital";
- Supervisory Statement, "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" (SS31/15); and
- Supervisory Statement, "Implementing CRD IV: Capital buffers" (SS6/14).
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulators Host the First Meeting of the New Climate Financial Risk Forum
03/13/2019
The Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority have published press releases following the first meeting of the Climate Financial Risk Forum on March 8, 2019. The CFRF is a joint forum established by the PRA and FCA in late 2018. The CFRF aims to encourage financial sector approaches towards managing the financial risks from climate change as well as supporting green finance. The CFRF will develop practical tools and approaches to reduce the barriers for firms looking to adopt a strategy for minimizing financial risks from climate change. The regulators are concerned with both the impact of climate change itself and the transition to supporting a low carbon economy. Both the FCA and the PRA consulted in late 2018 on the impact of climate change. The PRA consulted on a draft Supervisory Statement on managing the financial risks from climate change and the FCA consulted on climate change and green finance and the potential changes to its regulatory approach to these issues. The FCA consultation set out specific actions that the FCA intends to take in the short term in four areas - capital markets disclosures, public reporting requirements, green finance and pensions.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Final Rules on Definition of Default for Credit Risk
03/06/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published final rules and an updated Supervisory Statement alongside a Policy Statement on the definition of default for credit risk. The EU Capital Requirements Regulation's risk quantification provisions set out that a default occurs when an obligor is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to a firm, its parent or any of its subsidiaries. The materiality of the credit commitment is to be assessed against a threshold set by the national regulator according to its view of a reasonable level of risk.
The European Banking Authority developed a roadmap in 2016 to address concerns about the variability of own funds requirements arising from the internal models that firms use to calculate their minimum credit risk capital requirements under the CRR. The PRA is adopting a two-stage approach to implementing the EBA's roadmap. This first stage concerns the definition of default. The PRA will consult later on implementation of the second stage on PD and LGD estimation, once the EBA's regulatory products on this topic have been finalized.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Final Guidelines on Identifying an Economic Downturn in IRB Modelling
03/06/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a report and final Guidelines on the estimation of LGD appropriate for an economic downturn in compliance with the Capital Requirements Regulation, the Regulatory Technical Standards on the internal ratings-based assessment methodology and the final draft RTS on the specification of an economic downturn.
The Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2021 and firms should incorporate these requirements in their rating systems by that time. However, national regulators may bring forward, at their discretion, this deadline. The EBA Guidelines remind firms that the use of own estimates of LGD appropriate for an economic downturn is subject to approval by their home state regulator.
The Guidelines specify how LGD estimates appropriate for an economic downturn - identified in accordance with the draft RTS on economic downturn - should be quantified, taking into account the specificities of firm processes, underwriting standards and general response to adverse economic conditions. The Guidelines supplement the existing EBA Guidelines on Probability of Default, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets.
The publication of these Guidelines marks the completion of the EBA's 2016 roadmap, designed to address concerns about the variability of own funds requirements arising from the internal models that firms use to calculate their minimum credit risk capital requirements under the CRR.
View the final report and guidelines.
View details of the EBA's consultation on the guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Announces Forthcoming Statements on Various Issues of Concern
02/28/2019
On February 27-28th, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met to discuss policy and supervisory issues, and the extent to which members had implemented post-financial crisis reforms.
The Committee noted the implementation status of margin requirements for uncleared derivatives and it will publish in March a joint statement with the International Organization of Securities Commissions on certain implementation aspects of margin requirements.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Consults on Guidelines on Credit Risk Mitigation
02/25/2019
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper concerning proposed guidelines on credit risk mitigation for firms using the advanced internal ratings based approach with own estimates for loss given default. The consultation follows the EBA's report on the CRM framework, published in March 2018, which should be read in conjunction with the consultation paper. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by May 25, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Revised Guidelines on Outsourcing Arrangements
02/25/2019
The European Banking Authority has published revised Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements. The guidelines are intended to update and replace outsourcing guidelines issued in 2006 (by the EBA's predecessor, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors) on outsourcing by credit institutions. The EBA Guidelines have a wider scope, applying to all financial institutions that are within the scope of the EBA's mandate, namely credit institutions and investment firms subject to the Capital Requirements Directive, as well as payment institutions and electronic money institutions. The investment firms within scope, provided that the new Investment Firm Regulation and Directive and related changes to CRD and the Capital Requirements Regulation have entered into force, will only be the largest investment firms (Class 1 Investment Firms). The Guidelines also integrate the recommendation on outsourcing to cloud service providers that was published by the EBA in December 2017. Both the 2006 guidelines and the December 2017 recommendations will be repealed when these new Guidelines enter into force.
Read more. -
No Revision Needed to International Liquidity Risk Management Principles
01/17/2019
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has completed the review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The Basel Committee has concluded that the Principles do not require revision. The Committee expects both supervisors and banks to remain attentive to liquidity risks in the financial markets. Banks should take into account developments since 2008 that may impact their liquidity risk management considerations. These developments include, for example, increasing digitisation of finance and payment systems, an increased use of central clearing of derivatives and margining and the increasing significance of cyber-attacks.
View the announcement.
View the 2008 Principles.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Eurozone Single Resolution Board Publishes Policy Statement on Second Wave of 2018 MREL Policy
01/16/2019
The Eurozone Single Resolution Board has published the second wave of its 2018 minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities as part of resolution planning required under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and related Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation. The SRB published the first wave of the 2018 MREL requirements in November which applied to banks that did not have binding MREL targets in 2017.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Standards Finalizes Basel Market Risk Framework
01/14/2019
Following its consultation from March to June last year, the Basel Committee on Banking Standards has announced the final revisions to the Basel III market risk capital framework. At the same time, it has also announced its 2019 priorities.
The objective of the Basel market risk framework is to ensure that banks hold enough regulatory capital to protect against losses arising from movements in market prices of instruments held in their trading book. Certain changes to the 2016 market risk framework are to:
- Clarify the scope of application. The Committee has provided further guidance on the regulatory book to which instruments should be assigned in circumstances where instruments could go into more than one book and has revised the treatment of structural foreign currency positions. The revised framework also allows equity investments in funds to be allocated to the trading book, provided that a bank: (i) is able to "look through" to the fund's underlying assets; or (ii) has access both to daily price quotes and to the information contained in the mandate of the fund.
- Revise the internal model approach to address implementation challenges, in particular, by amending the profit and loss attribution (PLA) test metric and failure consequence.
- Amend the standardized model approach. The approach to measuring risk factor losses was too high in relation to the actual risk and there was unnecessary operational burden. The changes in the standardized approach include widening the scope of currency pairs that are considered liquid in the FX risk class to ensure more currency pairs are subject to lower risk weights and introducing new "index" buckets for equity and credit spread risks so that each underlying position in an index does not need to be identified.
-
UK Regulator Launches Consultation on Eligibility of Financial Collateral Under Capital Requirements Regulation
01/10/2019
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on proposed amendments to its Supervisory Statement on credit risk mitigation to clarify its expectations around the eligibility of financial collateral. The consultation paper is relevant for banks, building societies and PRA-designated U.K. investment firms that are subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation. The consultation closes on April 10, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Brexit: European Banking Authority Calls for More Communication with Clients
12/17/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a press release calling for firms to take more action in their Brexit-related communications with customers. The U.K. will depart the EU without a transitional period on March 30, 2019 if the withdrawal agreement is not ratified by that time. In June 2018, the EBA issued an Opinion that stressed the need for firms to consider their obligations to existing and prospective customers. It set out a list of minimum information that national regulators should ensure firms send to customers whose contracts or services might be affected by the end of the year. In its press release, the EBA urges firms to consider the June 2018 Opinion and to communicate to customers the risks and effects that a no-deal Brexit may have on a customer's contract with the firm.
View the press release.
View details of the EBA's June 2018 Opinion. -
Final EU Guidelines on Simple, Transparent and Standardized Criteria for Securitizations
12/12/2018
The European Banking Authority has published two sets of finalized guidelines under the Securitization Regulation which, along with targeted amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation, forms part of the new EU Securitization Framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations from January 2019. Originators and sponsors will be required to notify the European Securities and Markets Authority of any securitization that meets the STS criteria to be able to use the "STS" designation. ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website.
Read more. -
UK Regulations Implementing the EU Securitization Regulation Made
12/04/2018
The U.K. Securitization Regulations 2018 have been laid before Parliament and will come into force on January 1, 2019. The Regulations implement the EU Securitization Regulation (also known as the STS Regulation) into U.K. law.
The EU Securitization Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as simple, transparent and standardized securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria and common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. It also allows (but does not require) originators, sponsors and securitization special purpose entities to use third-party firms to assess whether a securitization meets the STS criteria, provided that those firms are authorized by the relevant national regulator. Originators, sponsors or original lenders of a securitization will be required to retain on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest in the securitization of at least 5%. Related amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation set out preferential regulatory treatment for investors, in particular, for bank investors, of their exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
Read more. -
European Supervisory Authorities Advocate Proportional Approach to Compliance With Certain Aspects of the Securitization Regulation
11/30/2018
The European Supervisory Authorities have issued a joint statement addressing two issues arising from the Securitization Regulation. The Securitization Regulation will apply directly across the EU from January 1, 2019 to securities issued under securitizations on or after January 1, 2019. Securitizations issued before that date may be referred to as STS securitizations, provided that they meet certain conditions.
The first issue addressed in the joint statement relates to disclosure requirements for EU securitizations. The Securitization Regulation requires originators and sponsors to notify ESMA of any securitization that meets the "Simple, Transparent and Standardized" criteria. ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website. Securitization special purpose entities, originators and sponsors of a securitization will be required to make certain information available via a securitization repository to holders of a securitization position, to the national regulators and, upon request, to potential investors. The European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Commission still have to address a number of market concerns on the proposed ESMA disclosure templates (that will be introduced as Technical Standards under the Regulation) as part of these transparency requirements. This is a process that will not be concluded by January 1, 2019.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Agrees Next Steps for Basel Standards
11/29/2018
Central bankers and banking supervisors from over eighty jurisdictions met this week in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to discuss a range of policy and supervisory topics.
On November 26-27, 2018 there was a meeting of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision at which it was agreed that a consultation would take place next year to discuss a framework to consolidate the Committee's standards into a single integrated structure. Moreover, a number of items were agreed:- A set of targeted revisions to the market risk framework which is due to be implemented by January 1, 2022.
- A consultation on potential enhanced disclosures to reduce bank window-dressing behaviour related to leverage ratio will be pursued. The Basel Committee issued a statement in October declaring unacceptable the alleged tendency in banks to engage in so-called window-dressing by temporarily reducing transaction volumes around key reference dates, which has supposedly the effect of allowing banks to report and publicly disclose better leverage ratios.
- A set of revisions to the Pillar 3 disclosure framework will be published in December.
- A report will be published in December setting out the range of bank, regulatory and supervisory cyber-resilience practices across jurisdictions.
View the press release.
View details of the Basel Committee's consultation on the revised market risk framework.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Conduct Authority Reports on Cyber Security Resilience in Financial Services
11/27/2018
The Financial Conduct Authority has published a report entitled "Cyber and Technology Resilience: Themes from cross-sector survey 2017-2018." The FCA compiled the report by requesting 296 firms during 2017 and 2018 to provide a self-assessment of their cyber and technological capabilities, focusing on governance, delivery of change management, managing third-party risks and the effectiveness of cyber defenses. The FCA analyzed the responses and considered data from firm's responses to recent operational incidents to produce the report.
Read more. -
UK Parliamentary Committee Launches Inquiry Into Operational Resilience in the Financial Services Sector
11/23/2018
The U.K. Treasury Committee has announced the launch of a new Inquiry into IT failures in the financial services sector. The Inquiry has been launched in response to recent IT failures at a number of financial institutions that have led to consumers being unable to access their bank accounts or becoming subject to fraud.
The Committee will assess the causes and consequences of these recent IT failures. Among other things, the Committee will consider the extent to which such incidents are becoming more frequent, sources of concentration risk in the financial sector, the impact of legacy IT systems, the effect of outsourcing on operational resilience, best practices in responding to operational incidents and whether the U.K. regulators are able to regulate firms' capabilities for responding to such incidents.
Written submissions can be made to the Committee by January 18, 2019. The Committee will also appoint a special advisor to provide policy advice to the Committee on the issues. Individuals interested in the role should respond to the call for Expressions of Interest.
View the announcement. -
UK Prudential Regulator Proposes Minor Policy Change for Systemic Risk Buffer
11/22/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper entitled "The systemic risk buffer: Updates to the Statement of Policy," proposing minor updates to its Statement of Policy, "The PRA’s approach to the systemic risk buffer." The consultation is relevant to "SRB institutions," which are: (i) ring-fenced bodies within the meaning in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000; or (ii) large building societies that hold more than £25 billion in deposits (where one or more of the account holders is a small business) and shares (excluding deferred shares).
The PRA proposes to amend the Statement of Policy to:
- remove the statement that the PRA’s approach to reviewing the SoP every two years is mandated by the SRB regulations;
- replace references to the PRA's April 2018 consultation, "The PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital," with references to the finalized Statement of Policy that was subsequently published; and
- include references to the PRA's Supervisory Statement, "UK leverage ratio framework," that was recently updated to apply an additional leverage ratio buffer rate to SRB institutions.
As the proposals are of only a minor nature, the consultation period is short and comments on the consultation paper are invited by December 6, 2018.
View the consultation paper (PRA CP 29/18).
Return to main website.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Eurozone Single Resolution Board Publishes Policy Statement on First Wave of 2018 MREL Policy
11/20/2018
The Eurozone Single Resolution Board has published its 2018 Policy Statement for firms’ minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities under the first wave of 2018 resolution plans to be adopted under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. The SRB is responsible for ensuring the compliance of Eurozone banks that are subject to the Single Resolution Mechanism (primarily Eurozone countries) with the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation and BRRD. As part of this function, the SRB works with national regulators to determine relevant institutions’ MREL requirements. The purpose of the Policy Statement is to provide clarity for Eurozone banks on the SRB’s determination of 2018 MREL targets.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Report on Incentives to Clear OTC Derivatives Published by Global Standard Setting Bodies
11/19/2018
A final joint report on the incentives to clear OTC derivatives has been published by the Financial Stability Board, the International Organization of Securities Commissions, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. The report is part of the FSB's post-implementation evaluation of the effects of the G20 financial regulatory reforms.
The report sets out the results of an evaluation of the reforms that have been implemented to incentivize central clearing of OTC derivatives and outlines areas for further consideration by the global standard setting bodies. The reforms considered include mandatory clearing requirements, capital, liquidity and margin requirements, as well as the reforms to CCP resilience, recovery and resolution.
Read more. -
2018 List of Globally Systemically Important Banks Published
11/16/2018
The Financial Stability Board has published the 2018 list of global systemically important banks. Alongside the 2018 G-SIB list, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published further information relating to its 2018 assessment of G-SIBs, including:- a list of all the banks in the assessment sample;
- the denominators of each of the 12 high-level indicators used to calculate the banks' scores;
- the 12 high-level indicators for each bank in the sample used to calculate these denominators;
- the cut-off score used to identify G-SIBs in the updated list and the thresholds used to allocate G-SIBs to buckets for the purpose of calculating the specific higher loss absorbency requirements; and
- links to disclosures of all banks in the assessment sample.
The Basel Committee assessment was based on its 2013 methodology for identifying G-SIBs. The revised 2018 assessment methodology will apply from 2021, based on end-2020 data and the corresponding higher loss absorbency requirements will apply from January 1, 2023.
View the 2018 G-SIB list.
View details of the revised assessment framework for G-SIBs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Final Draft Technical Standards on Estimating and Identifying an Economic Downturn in IRB Modelling
11/16/2018
The European Banking Authority has published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation. The aim of the RTS is to ensure that institutions using the Internal Ratings-Based approach to calculating capital requirements can use a well-defined and common specification of the nature, duration and severity of an economic downturn for portfolios relating to comparable types of exposure.
The nature of the economic downturn is defined as a set of relevant economic factors and its severity is specified via the most severe values observed on the relevant economic factors over a given historical period. The duration of an economic downturn is specified using the concept of a "downturn period," namely the period of time where the peaks or troughs, which relate to the most severe values of one or several economic factors, are observed.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Final First Chapter of Its Guide to Internal Models
11/15/2018
The European Central Bank has published the final first chapter of its guide to internal models. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the ECB to assess and grant permission for banks directly supervised by the ECB to use internal models for credit risk, counterparty credit risk and market risk. The ECB's guide sets out how the ECB intends to approach the assessment of whether a firm meets the necessary requirements for the permission to be granted. This chapter is on general topics, comprising overarching principles for internal models, implementation of the internal ratings-based approach, internal model governance, internal validation and audit, model use, change management and third-party involvement. The ECB recently consulted on model-specific chapters, including for credit, market and counterparty credit risks.
The ECB notes that the guide may need to be amended if the European Commission adopts a different version of the European Banking Authority's final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on assessment methodology for the IRB approach.
View the guide.
View the feedback statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Finalizes Supervisory Approach for New EU Securitization Framework
11/15/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement setting out its approach to supervision under the new EU securitization framework that will take effect from January 1, 2019. The PRA consulted on its proposals in May 2018. The incoming EU framework consists of: (i) the Securitization Regulation, which imposes general requirements for all EU securitization activity and outlines the criteria and process for designating certain securitizations as "Simple, Transparent and Standardised"; and (ii) revisions to the banking securitization capital framework within the Capital Requirements Regulation. Respondents to the PRA's consultation on its approach were largely supportive. The PRA has made some changes (outlined in the Policy Statement) to its consultation text in line with comments received.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Finalizes Changes to the Leverage Ratio Rules for Ring-Fenced Banks
11/14/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on applying the U.K. leverage ratio to systemic Ring-fenced Bodies and reflecting the Systemic Risk Buffer. The SRB is one of the elements of the overall capital framework for U.K. banks and building societies. It will be applied by the PRA to individual institutions and introduced at the same time that ring-fencing comes into force in 2019. RFBs are banks that hold more than £25 billion in core deposits. They must separate their core retail banking business from their investment banking business by January 1, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Final Guides for Capital and Liquidity Management
11/12/2018
The European Central Bank has published two finalized Guides, one on the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and the other on the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP). The ECB consulted on draft versions of the Guides between March and May 2018. The Guides, which are relevant to institutions within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, are designed to assist institutions in strengthening their ICAAPs and ILAAPs and encourage the use of best practices by explaining in greater detail the ECB's expectations.
The ICAAP and ILAAP Guides each set out seven principles that have been derived from the relevant provisions of the Capital Requirements Directive and that will be considered, among other things, by the ECB in the assessment of each institution's ICAAP or ILAAP as part of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. Frequently Asked Questions have also been published alongside the Guides, along with consultation responses received and a feedback statement.
The ECB intends to use the guides to assess significant institutions' ICAAPs and ILAAPs from January 1, 2019.
View the ICAAP Guide.
View the ILAAP Guide.
View the FAQs.
View the consultation responses.
View the feedback statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Legislation Published to Update Supervisory Reporting Requirements
11/09/2018
A Commission Implementing Regulation supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Implementing Regulation amends the existing Implementing Regulation ((EU) No 680/2014) to reflect the gradual supplementation and amendment of elements of the CRR reporting requirements by the adoption of further Regulatory Technical Standards. The Amending Regulation was adopted by the European Commission on October 9, 2018. It amends the existing Implementing Regulation to set out:- additional requirements relating to prudent valuation adjustments of fair-valued positions;
- additional requirements to accommodate the reporting on securitization positions subject to the revised securitization framework; and
- minor changes to the reporting requirements on the geographical distribution of exposures.
The Amending Regulation will enter into force on November 29, 2018 and will apply directly across the EU from December 1, 2018.
View Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1627. -
European Banking Authority Final Guidelines on Managing Non-Performing and Forborne Exposures
10/31/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a final report setting out finalized Guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures (FBEs). The EBA consulted on a draft of the Guidelines in March 2018. The aim of the Guidelines is to help to reduce NPEs on banks' balance sheets by providing supervisory guidance to ensure that credit institutions effectively manage NPEs and forborne exposures (FBEs) on their balance sheets.
The final Guidelines cover: (i) key elements for developing and implementing an NPE strategy; (ii) the key elements of governance and operations in relation to an NPE workout framework; (iii) governance and operations in relation to FBEs; (iv) governance and operations for NPE recognition; (v) NPE impairment measurement and write-offs; (vi) collateral valuation of immovable and movable property; and (vii) supervisory evaluation of management of NPEs and FBEs.
The Guidelines will apply from June 30, 2019. Credit institutions should calculate their NPL ratios using the reference date of December 31, 2018.
View the final report.
View details of the EBA's consultation on the Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Updates Approach Document on Banking Supervision
10/31/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published an updated version of its document entitled "The Prudential Regulatory Authority's approach to banking supervision." The document replaces the previous version that was dated March 2016.
In the latest update, the PRA has removed duplicative information and replaced some text with links to information contained in legislation or other material on the PRA's or Bank of England's website. The update includes a new foreword by the PRA's Chief Executive Officer, Sam Woods.
The update includes two new chapters, on identifying the risks to the PRA's objectives and on how the PRA tailors its supervisory approach. A number of new sections to existing chapters have also been added, covering safety and soundness and the stability of the financial system, the PRA's regulatory principles and operational resilience. Further detail in areas such as capital and resolvability is also added.
View the Updated Approach Document.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Amending Legislation Published for Liquidity Coverage Requirement
10/30/2018
An Amending Regulation supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, following its adoption in July 2018 by the European Commission. The Amending Regulation, which relates to the Liquidity Coverage Requirement for credit institutions, makes changes to the existing Delegated Regulation on the LCR with the objective of improving its practical application. The existing Delegated Regulation sets out detailed requirements on the LCR and specifies which assets are to be considered as liquid (so-called high quality liquid assets) and how the expected cash outflows and inflows over a 30-day stressed period are to be calculated.
The Amending Regulation makes the following changes:- full alignment of the calculation of the expected liquidity outflows and inflows on repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and collateral swaps transactions with the international liquidity standard developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision;
- treatment of certain reserves held with third-country central banks;
- waiver of the minimum issue size for certain non-EU liquid assets;
- the application of the unwind mechanism for the calculation of the liquidity buffer; and
- integration in the existing Delegated Regulation of the new criteria for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations.
The Amending Regulation will enter into force on November 19, 2018 and will apply directly across the EU from April 30, 2020.
View the Amending Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Supervisory Authorities Propose Revisions to Implementing Technical Standards for Mapping of External Credit Ratings
10/26/2018
The Joint Committee of the European Securities Authorities (that is, the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) has published a consultation paper setting out proposed revisions to Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of External Credit Assessment Institutions' credit assessments under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
The proposed revisions will amend the existing Implementing Regulation ((EU) 2016/1799), which sets out how ECAIs' credit assessments should be "mapped" to credit quality steps for the purposes of calculating capital requirements. The proposed amendments reflect the result of a monitoring exercise on the adequacy of mappings, which necessitates amendments related to: (i) the re-allocation of the credit quality steps for two ECAIs; and (ii) changes in credit rating scales/types for ten ECAIs. The consultation webpage also contains mapping reports for each of the 11 ECAIs concerned.
Comments on the consultation are invited by December 31, 2018. Respondents are asked to provide comments via the "Send your comments" button on the EBA's consultation webpage.
View the consultation paper.
View the EBA's consultation webpage. -
European Banking Authority Sets Out Its Work Priorities for 2019
10/23/2018
The European Banking Authority has published its Work Programme for 2019, setting out details of, and planned main outputs from, 37 separate work streams across the following five key strategic priorities:
- Leading the Basel III implementation in the EU.
- Understanding risks and opportunities arising from financial innovation.
- Collecting, disseminating and analyzing banking data.
- Ensuring a smooth relocation of the EBA to Paris.
- Fostering the increase of the loss-absorbing capacity of the EU banking system.
The EBA also confirms that work related to Brexit will remain a horizontal priority for the EBA in 2019 and explains that the EBA's other activities may be affected in the future by Brexit-related developments. Should that be the case, any substantial change in the work programme will be communicated in due time, in order to seek steering and approval from its Management Board and Board of Supervisors.
View the EBA's 2019 Work Programme. -
European Commission Announces Work Plan for 2019
10/23/2018
The European Commission has published a Communication, outlining its work plan for 2019. The Communication is addressed to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Communication discusses the ongoing challenges for the EU in the run-up to the European Parliamentary elections and the post-Brexit Summit in Sibiu at which a new multi-annual framework for the EU27 will be finalized.
Separately published Annexes to the Communication relating to: (i) new initiatives; (ii) REFIT initiatives; (iii) priority pending proposals; (iv) legislative initiatives that have been withdrawn; and (v) a list of envisaged repeals. Priority pending proposals of particular relevance to financial institutions include legislative proposals relating to the forthcoming sustainable finance package, cross-border distribution of collective investment schemes, crowdfunding, amendments to the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, prudential regulation and supervision of investment firms and a proposed amending regulation relating to minimum loss coverage for non-performing exposures.
Read more. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Leverage Ratio Treatment of Client-Cleared Derivatives
10/18/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation paper entitled "Leverage ratio treatment of client-cleared derivatives," seeking views from stakeholders on whether a targeted and limited revision of the leverage ratio exposure measure is warranted with respect to the treatment of client cleared derivatives.
On the publication of the finalized Basel III framework in December 2017, the Basel Committee stated that it would continue to monitor the impact of the Basel III leverage ratio’s treatment of client-cleared derivative transactions. It confirmed that it would review the impact of the leverage ratio on banks’ provision of clearing services and any consequent impact on the resilience of central counterparty clearing. The Basel Committee has completed its review and is of the view that only a strong evidence-based case would justify making revisions to the current leverage ratio treatment of client cleared derivatives.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Highlights Concerns About Leverage Ratio "Window-Dressing"
10/18/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has issued a statement on leverage ratio "window-dressing" behavior by banks.
To comply with the Basel III leverage ratio standard, among other things, banks are required to publicly disclose their leverage ratio, calculated on a quarter-end basis, or more frequently in certain jurisdictions. The Basel Committee has noted what may be a tendency in banks to engage in so-called window-dressing by temporarily reducing transaction volumes around key reference dates, which has the effect of allowing banks to report and publicly disclose higher leverage ratios.
The Basel Committee states that window dressing is unacceptable as it undermines the policy objectives of the leverage ratio standard and risks disrupting the operations of financial markets. The Basel Committee calls on banks to desist from undertaking transactions for window-dressing purposes and makes several suggestions for actions by supervisors to address these concerns. These include increasing the frequency of reporting and supervisory monitoring, focused supervisory inspections and/or additional public disclosures. The Basel Committee will continue to monitor potential window-dressing behavior and may consider adjusting the Pillar 1 minimum capital requirements and/or Pillar 3 disclosure requirements if necessary.
View the Basel Committee's Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Updated Stress Testing Principles
10/17/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a final version of its Stress Testing Principles, which replace its 2009 Principles for Stress Testing and Supervision. The Basel Committee conducted a review of the 2009 Principles during 2017 and launched a consultation on proposed revisions in December 2017.
The new principles reflect the growth in importance of stress testing since the 2009 version was produced and its evolution into a critical element of risk management for banks as well as a core tool for both banking supervisors and macroprudential authorities.
The new principles are also set at a higher level than the previous version, so that the principles can apply across many banks and jurisdictions and so that they are robust to developments in stress testing practices. The principles focus on the core elements of stress testing frameworks, including the objectives, governance, policies, processes, methodology, resources and documentation that guide stress testing. Each principle is followed by a short description of considerations that are equally relevant for banks and authorities, along with additional considerations for banks or authorities.
View the Stress Testing Principles.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Managing Financial Risks from Climate Change
10/15/2018
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper on a draft Supervisory Statement on managing the financial risks from climate change. The consultation follows the PRA's publication in September 2018 of its report "Transition in thinking: The impact of climate change on the U.K. banking sector." The consultation paper is relevant to banks, insurers, re-insurers, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. The PRA wants firms to take a strategic approach to financial risks from climate change by taking into account current and credible risks and identifying actions needed now to mitigate existing and future risks.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Proposes Period of Overlap for Transition to New Pillar 2 Reporting Template
10/12/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation proposing a six-month overlap period following the introduction of the new Pillar 2 Liquidity reporting template (PRA110) from July 1, 2019. The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set additional Pillar 2 liquidity requirements, to capture those liquidity risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under the Pillar 1 framework. The final element - Pillar 3 - involves public reporting of capital. The PRA published its final Policy Statement on the introduction of its Pillar 2 framework in February 2018. The PRA110 template was scheduled to replace the existing "daily flows" and "enhanced mismatch" liquidity reports (FSA047 and FSA048) from July 1, 2019.
Since its Policy Statement, the PRA has reassessed the risks from transitioning to the PRA110 template and considers it prudent to delay the termination of FSA047 and FSA048, to ensure data quality and continuity. The PRA proposes that the PRA110 is introduced on July 1, 2019 as planned. However, between then and January 1, 2020, firms should additionally continue to submit liquidity reports using FSA047 and FSA048. The overlap will allow the PRA and firms alike to assess the quality of PRA110 reporting.
The PRA is inviting comments on the proposal by November 12, 2018. The PRA considers that the short consultation period is justified due to the fact that firms are already reporting using FSA047 and FSA048.
View the consultation paper (PRA CP22/18).
View details of the PRA's Pillar 2 Policy Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Conduct Regulator Consults on Brexit-Related Changes to Its Rulebook and Binding Technical Standards
10/10/2018
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published its first consultation on proposed changes to the FCA Handbook to ensure a functioning legal and regulatory framework for financial services in the event of a "no-deal" scenario whereby the U.K. exits the EU on March 29, 2019 without a ratified Withdrawal Agreement in place and there is consequently no transitional period for firms. The proposed amendments will not take effect if the U.K. enters into a transitional period after exit day.
The consultation includes the FCA's proposals in relation to the Binding Technical Standards it has been empowered by HM Treasury to amend prior to Brexit and to maintain afterward. These are the retained EU "Level 2" delegated and implementing regulations that set out regulatory technical standards and implementing technical standards. The consultation also sets out the FCA's proposed approach to non-legislative "Level 3" materials such as guidelines, recommendations and opinions that will also be onshored.
The FCA states in the consultation that the majority of the proposed changes are consequential in nature and follow the amendments to retained EU law that HM Treasury is proposing, as set out in the series of financial services-related statutory instruments being made under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Read more. -
UK Financial Policy Committee Publishes Outcome of its October Meeting
10/09/2018
The Financial Policy Committee has published a statement from its meeting held on October 3, 2018 where it reviewed developments since June 19, 2018. The FPC continues to consider that the U.K. banking system is sufficiently robust to withstand the disruption of a "hard Brexit" and that there is no need for additional capital buffers for banks as a result. The FPC is of the view that the banking system would be able to absorb, in addition to a disorderly Brexit, further costs that might arise from trade tensions. However, the FPC is concerned about the lack of action taken by EU authorities to address the risks of disruption in the event of the U.K. leaving the EU without a deal on March 29, 2019. In particular, the FPC would like mitigating action to be taken to address the risks associated with derivatives contracts and the transfer of personal data.
Aside from the risks presented by Brexit, the FPC considers that domestic risks are still at a standard level overall. However, the FPC is concerned about the swift growth of leveraged lending and intends to: (i) assess the implications for banks in the 2018 stress test; and (ii) review the impact of the increasing role of non-bank lenders and changes in the distribution of corporate debt. The FPC has decided to maintain the U.K. countercyclical capital buffer rate at 1% and will review the rate again at its meeting on November 28, 2018.
Read more. -
US FDIC Seeks to Improve Communication, Transparency and Accountability10/05/2018
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published a notice and request for comment seeking input on how to improve the efficacy, efficiency and transparency of the agency’s communication with insured depository institutions. The notice outlines current forms of communication, including, regulations, policies, procedures and guidance; news and updates; industry data, educational materials and outreach; general communication; and direct communication. The notice requests comment with respect to the efficiency, ease of access and content of communications with insured financial institutions. Comments to the FDIC’s notice are due no later than December 4, 2018.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Changes to Forms for Regulatory Transactions
10/01/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation entitled "Regulatory transactions: Changes to notification and application forms." The proposals in the consultation are for the amendment of various PRA forms that are used for applications and notifications for regulatory transactions. The PRA has chosen to combine the proposals into one substantial consultation paper to avoid having to issue multiple separate consultations on the same forms. The affected forms are located in the Passporting, Change in Control, Insurance Special Purpose Vehicles (ISPVs) and Notifications Parts of the PRA Rulebook.
The consultation proposals are relevant for PRA-authorized firms and any firms that have, or intend to acquire, a qualifying holding in a PRA-authorized firm.
Comments on the consultation are invited by November 1, 2018. The PRA expects that the proposals will take effect immediately after the publication of its planned Policy Statement.
View the consultation paper (PRA CP 21/18).Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulator Reports on Climate-Related Financial Risks for the UK Banking Sector
09/26/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a report entitled "Transition in thinking: The impact of climate change on the U.K. banking sector".
The purpose of the report is to: (i) examine the financial risks from climate change that impact PRA regulated banks, building societies and designated investment firms; (ii) assess how those entities are responding to and managing the financial risks from climate change; and (iii) assist those entities in understanding the PRA's supervisory approach to the financial risks from climate change. The report will also be used to inform the Bank of England's wider work to assess the system-wide financial risks from climate change.
Read more. -
International Task Force Report Shows Momentum Building for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures
09/26/2018
The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures has issued a status report outlining progress on adoption of the TCFD disclosure recommendations issued in June 2017. The TCFD was established by the Financial Stability Board in 2015 and its 2017 recommendations provide a voluntary framework for companies to develop more effective climate-related financial disclosures through their existing reporting processes. The recommendations are structured around four areas: (i) governance; (ii) strategy; (iii) risk management; and (iv) metrics and targets.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Guide to On-site Inspections and Internal Model Investigations
09/21/2018
The European Central Bank has published its finalized Guide to on-site inspections and internal model investigations under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB is empowered under the SSM Regulation to conduct, with respect to Eurozone entities within its supervisory remit: (i) on-site inspections, which are in-depth investigations of risk, risk controls and governance; and (ii) internal model investigations, which involve in-depth assessments of internal models used for the calculation of own fund requirements.
The ECB has developed the Guide as a reference document for supervised entities and other legal entities for which the ECB has decided to launch an on-site inspection. It consulted on a draft of the Guide in July 2017 and has published a separate feedback statement on the consultation responses that were received. The Guide applies to ECB inspections of significant institutions, less significant institutions and other legal entities referred to in the SSM Regulation, including third parties to whom credit institutions have outsourced functions.
The Guide comprises three sections: (i) the general framework for inspections; (ii) the inspection process; and (iii) applicable principles for inspections. The Guide is not a legally binding document and does not replace the legal requirements laid down in the relevant applicable EU law.
View the Guide.
View the feedback statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Provides Brief Update on Various Workstreams
09/20/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a press release summarizing the outcome of its meeting on September 19-20, 2018. The Committee committed to consider Pillar 1 and Pillar 3 measures to prevent banks adjusting their balance sheets around regulatory reporting dates to manipulate reported leverage ratios. In addition, the Committee intends to further analyze banks' exposures to crypto-assets to reach a conclusion on whether action is needed to address the risks that these assets may present.
The Basel Committee will publish the following before the end of the year:- an updated 2018 list of global systemically important banks, along with the high-level indicator values of all the banks that are within the G-SIB assessment exercise;
- final revisions to the market risk framework (towards the end of the year);
- a consultation paper (in October 2018) on whether the exposure measure should be revised to alleviate its impact on client clearing, including presenting options for revising this; and
- the revised Principles on Stress Testing (in October 2018).
The Basel Committee also published responses to Frequently Asked Questions on the treatment of settled-to-market derivatives under the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio.
View the press release.
View the FAQs. -
US-UK Financial Regulatory Working Group Holds Inaugural Meeting
09/18/2018
The U.S.-U.K. Financial Regulatory Working Group has issued a statement following its inaugural meeting held on September 12, 2018 in London. Participants discussed the outlook for financial regulatory reforms and future priorities, including possible areas for deeper regulatory cooperation to facilitate further financial services activity between U.S. and U.K. markets. Participants also discussed Brexit-related issues, including: (i) U.S.-U.K. financial regulatory issues resulting from the U.K.’s exit from the EU; and (ii) the implications of Brexit for financial stability and cross-border financial regulation, including contractual continuity and potential cliff-edge risks.
The Working Group was established in April 2018 to serve as a forum for staff from the U.S. Department of the Treasury and HM Treasury and financial regulatory authorities to exchange views on the regulatory relationship between the U.S. and the U.K. Its objectives are to further financial regulatory cooperation, improve transparency, reduce regulatory uncertainty, identify possible cross-border implementation issues, address regulatory arbitrage and work towards achieving compatibility of U.S. and U.K. laws and regulations.
The next meeting of the Working Group will be held in the first half of 2019 in Washington, D.C.
View the statement. -
European Central Bank Consults on Part 2 to Guide to Licensing Credit Institutions
09/14/2018
The European Central Bank has opened a consultation on a draft Part 2 to its Guide to Assessments of Licence Applications by banks. The ECB published the Guide to Assessment of Licence Applications in March 2018, which applies to all license applications to become a credit institution within the meaning of the Capital Requirements Regulation. The ECB developed the Guide, which is not legally binding, to promote awareness and enhance the transparency of the assessment criteria and processes for establishing a credit institution within the Single Supervisory Mechanism.
The consultation on the draft Part 2 of the Guide focuses on assessment criteria for capital requirements and business plans, including initial capital, own funds, location, operations and structural organization, banking group and outsourcing.
The consultation closes on October 25, 2018.
View the consultation paper.
View the consultation webpage.
View details of the Guide to Assessments of Licence Applications.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Seeks Comments Regarding the Treatment of Reciprocal Deposits
09/13/2018
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published a notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments regarding a limited exception for a capped amount of reciprocal deposits from treatment as brokered deposits.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Proposes Enhancements to the European Banking Authority's Supervisory Powers for Anti-Money Laundering
09/12/2018
The European Commission has published a Communication setting out a broad strategy for strengthening the EU's framework for anti-money laundering supervision. The Communication is accompanied by a fact sheet setting out Questions and Answers on the strategy.
The Commission notes that, despite the recent strengthening of the EU's framework, through the Fourth Money Laundering Directive (4MLD) and the forthcoming Fifth Money Laundering Directive (5MLD), there are concerns that gaps remain in the EU's supervisory framework. The Commission highlights that there is no clear articulation between the prudential and anti-money laundering rules for financial institutions. It identifies shortcomings in the reaction time of national supervisors and in the level of cooperation and information sharing both between prudential and anti-money laundering supervisors and on a cross-border basis between EU supervisors and other supervisors based both within and outside the EU. While the Commission recognizes that 5MLD will remove certain obstacles to cooperation between anti-money laundering and prudential supervisors, it also notes that further steps are necessary to ensure effective supervisory cooperation, especially where financial institutions operate across borders.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Revisions to Supervisory Reporting Requirements
09/12/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on changes to the PRA's reporting requirements to reflect proposed changes set out by the European Banking Authority in EBA consultations launched in August 2018. The EBA proposes a number of revisions to the existing Implementing Technical Standards on the supervisory reporting requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation. These include proposed revisions to the financial reporting (FINREP) annexes of the ITS, which add new reporting requirements for non-performing and forborne exposures, amend the reporting of profit or loss items (in particular on expenses) and amend the reporting on leases following International Financial Reporting Standard 16. Proposed revisions to the common reporting (COREP) annexes relate to the Liquidity Coverage Requirement for credit institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Proposes to Permit Certain Federal Savings Associations to Operate with National Bank Powers
09/10/2018
The U.S. Office of Comptroller of the Currency published a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding permitting federal savings associations with total consolidated assets of $20 billion or less as of December 31, 2017 (“covered savings associations”), to elect to operate with the same rights and privileges as a national bank. The proposed rule seeks to implement Section 206 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which amends the Home Owners’ Loan Act, and is intended to provide business flexibility for certain federal savings associations to adapt to change without a corresponding requirement to change charters. Under the proposed rule, a covered savings association has same rights and privileges as a national bank that has its main office situated in the same location as the home office of the covered savings association, and is subject to the same duties, restrictions, penalties, liabilities, conditions and limitations that would apply to such a national bank. The covered savings institution, however, will retain its federal savings association charter, and will be treated as a federal savings association for governance and other purposes, including consolidation, merger, dissolution, conversion, conservatorship and receivership. Treatment as a covered savings association would generally continue even after the institution’s total consolidated assets exceed $20 billion. Comments to proposed rule are due no later than November 19, 2018.
View full text of the proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Seeks to Retire Certain Financial Institution Letters
09/10/2018
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published a proposal (FIL-46-2018) seeking comment with respect to the retirement of certain Financial Institution Letters. FILs are letters that typically announce various types of regulations, policies, publications, and other matters of interest to those in the banking community. The retired FILs would be archived and moved to inactive status, but would still be available for reference. The FDIC issued the proposal pursuant to the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996, which requires the FDIC (and other agencies) to conduct a review of their rules at least every 10 years to identify outdated or unnecessary regulations. In connection with this mandate, the FDIC has identified 374 FILs issued between 1995 and 2017 regarding risk management supervision that have become outdated or redundant. The FDIC is also currently reviewing FILs regarding other subject matters, and is exploring opportunities to update or streamline its remaining FILs generally. Comments to the proposal are due by October 10, 2018.
View full text of the FDIC proposal, including a list of the letters to be retired.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Finalizes Technical Amendment to Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements
08/30/2018
Following a consultation in March 2018, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a finalized technical amendment to the consolidated Pillar 3 disclosure technical standard that was issued in March 2017. The amendment imposes additional Pillar 3 disclosure requirements for those jurisdictions implementing an Expected Credit Loss, or ECL, accounting model as well as for those adopting transitional arrangements for the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions. These additional disclosures require banks to disclose, where applicable: (i) the "fully loaded" impact of ECL transitional arrangements used in Total Loss Absorbing Capacity resources and ratios; (ii) the allocation between general and specific provisions for standardized approach exposures; and (iii) the rationale for their categorization of ECL accounting provisions in general and specific categories for standardized approach exposures.
The technical amendment will also apply to jurisdictions adopting transitional arrangements for the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions. The interim approach to, and transitional arrangements for, the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions were published separately by the Basel Committee in March 2017.
The amendments covered by the revised Technical Standard will take effect from January 1, 2019.
View the Technical Amendment.
View the consultation paper.
View the interim approach and transitional arrangements published March 2017.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Publishes Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with Respect to Community Reinvestment Act Modernization
08/28/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking with respect to the modernization of the Community Reinvestment Act.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Interim Final Rule Expanding the Applicability of the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement
08/28/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued an interim final rule increasing the asset threshold for the applicability of the Federal Reserve Board’s Small Bank Holding Company and Savings and Loan Holding Company Policy Statement (Regulation Y, Appendix C) from $1 billion to $3 billion in total consolidated assets.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Revised Implementing Technical Standards for Reporting of Securitization Information
08/28/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a consultation paper setting out proposed amendments to existing Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting, to align the reporting of securitizations with the new EU securitization framework. The new securitization framework took effect in January 2018 and comprises: (i) the Securitization Regulation (also known as the STS Regulation), which lays down common due diligence for institutional investors, risk retention and transparency measures and establishes a category of simple, transparent and standardized securitization in the EU; and (ii) a Regulation making targeted amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation to provide for the capital treatment of STS securitizations and certain SME synthetic securitizations, including measures to reduce reliance on external credit ratings.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Proposes Revised Implementing Technical Standards for Supervisory Reporting Under the Capital Requirements Regulation
08/28/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on proposed revisions to the existing Implementing Technical Standards for the financial reporting, or FINREP, framework under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
The proposed revisions relate to the reporting requirements for non-performing and forborne exposures. The EBA proposes revisions to existing templates to provide for additional breakdowns on performing and non-performing exposures, forborne exposures and collateral obtained. The proposals include some new templates for additional reporting by institutions with elevated levels of non-performing exposures that are not "small and non-complex." The new templates are designed to provide further insights into an institution's portfolios of performing and non-performing loans and/or or forborne loans and advances and on collateral obtained. The EBA also proposes revisions to the reporting on profit or loss items in FINREP and to account for the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases, which is due to replace IAS 17 as the standard for the accounting of leases from January 1, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Revised Supervisory Reporting Technical Standards on Liquidity Coverage Requirement
08/28/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on proposed revisions to the Implementing Technical Standards that relate to supervisory reporting, under the common reporting, or COREP, framework, in line with the Liquidity Coverage Requirement, or LCR, under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
The proposed revisions to the ITS are intended to reflect amendments made to an existing Delegated Regulation supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation. These amendments were made by an Amending Regulation adopted by the European Commission in July 2018. The changes introduced by the Amending Regulation require the EBA to make related changes to the ITS on LCR reporting to capture the necessary elements for its calculation and monitoring. The revisions to the ITS relate mainly to the calculation of inflows and outflows in securities financing transactions and collateral swaps or the unwind waivers envisaged for some SFTs and collateral swaps with central banks. Further minor amendments are also proposed.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC Expand 18-Month Examination Cycle for Small Banks and Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks
08/23/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly issued an interim final rule and request for comment to expand the number of insured depository institutions and U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks eligible for an 18-month on-site examination cycle.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Issues Opinion on Proposed Prudential Framework for Investment Firms
08/22/2018
The European Central Bank has published an Opinion on the legislative proposals adopted by the European Commission in December 2017 for a new framework for the prudential regulation of investment firms. The framework proposed by the European Commission comprises a proposal for a regulation on the prudential requirements of investment firms (including amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the European Banking Authority Regulation) along with a proposal for a directive on the prudential supervision of investment firms, which includes amendments to the CRD IV Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The ECB was asked by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to provide its opinion on the proposed framework in January 2018.
In the Opinion the ECB states that it generally supports the objectives of the proposed framework, which are to create a prudential framework better suited to the risks and business models of different types of investment firms and to subject systemically important investment firms to the same prudential rules as credit institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC Issue Interim Final Rule with Respect to the Treatment of Certain Municipal Obligations as High-Quality Liquid Assets
08/22/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly issued an interim final rule and request for comment to treat “liquid and readily-marketable,” investment grade municipal obligations as level 2B high-quality liquid assets (HQLAs) for purposes of the liquidity coverage ratio rule.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Final Draft Technical Standards on Reporting and Disclosure Requirements for Securitizations
08/22/2018
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a final report and technical standards on the disclosure and reporting requirements under the EU Securitization Regulation (or STS Regulation). The Securitization Regulation requires originators and sponsors to notify ESMA of any securitization that meets the "Simple, Transparent and Standardized" criteria. ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website. Securitization special purpose entities, originators and sponsors of a securitization will be required to make certain information available via a securitization repository to holders of a securitization position, to the national regulators and, upon request, to potential investors. The Securitization Regulation will apply directly across the EU from January 1, 2019 to securities issued under securitizations on or after January 1, 2019. Securitizations issued before that date may be referred to as STS securitizations provided that they meet certain conditions.
Read more. -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Publishes Updated Business Combinations Booklet
07/31/2018
The U.S. Officer of the Comptroller of the Currency released an updated version of the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual Business Combinations booklet. The booklet, which was updated in November of 2017, has been revised to make certain technical corrections and process updates with respect to clarifications regarding the public notice and comment period and a change in the public comment calculation period.
View full text of the revised booklet.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft EU Technical Standards on Securitization Risk Retention Requirements
07/31/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the EU Securitization Regulation (or STS Regulation) on the risk retention requirements for originators, sponsors and original lenders. The Securitization Regulation requires, among other things, originators, sponsors or original lenders of a securitization to retain on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest in the securitization of at least 5 %. The final draft RTS specify in greater detail the risk retention requirement, including the modalities of retaining risk, the measurement of the level of retention, the prohibition of hedging or selling the retained interest and the conditions for retention on a consolidated basis.
The final draft RTS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement. The final RTS will apply directly across the EU twenty days after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The Securitization Regulation, which will apply from January 1, 2019, has replaced the risk retention requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation. Once the final RTS enter into force, the existing Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) No 625/2014) on risk retention requirements, made under the Capital Requirements Regulation, will be repealed.
View the final draft RTS.
View the existing Delegated Regulation on risk retention requirements.
View details of the EBA's consultation on the draft RTS. -
Final Draft EU Technical Standards on Homogeneity Conditions for STS Securitizations
07/31/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the EU Securitization Regulation on the conditions for a securitization to be considered homogenous. Homogeneity is one of the requirements for a securitization to be classed as a simple, transparent and standardized securitization or STS securitization. Exposures related to STS securitizations will attract lower risk weightings for firms subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation. The new EU securitization framework will apply across the EU from January 1, 2019.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Consults on Changes to Definition of Default for Credit Risk
07/27/2018
The Prudential Regulation Authority has opened a consultation on proposals to implement the European Banking Authority's recent regulatory products on the definition of default in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR risk quantification provisions set out that a default occurs when an obligor is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to a firm, its parent or any of its subsidiaries. The materiality of the credit commitment is to be assessed against a threshold set by the national regulator according to its view of a reasonable level of risk.
The EBA developed a roadmap of regulatory products that aim to reduce unwarranted variability in the risk weighted assets calculated using banks' Internal Ratings-Based models. Three of these products pertain to the definition of default: the Regulatory Technical Standards on the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due, the Guidelines on the application of the definition of default and the EBA Opinion on the use of the 180 days past due criterion.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Revised Pillar 2 Guidelines
07/20/2018
Following a consultation between October 2017 and January 2018 on a package of revisions to certain of its Guidelines, the European Banking Authority has published three final reports and revised Guidelines aimed at strengthening the Pillar 2 framework.
The revised Guidelines have been prepared in line with the EBA's April 2017 Roadmap for revisions of the Pillar 2 framework, to keep the SREP Guidelines that were published in December 2014 (and in force from January 2016) up to date with respect to the EU and international standards. The EBA also aims to promote best supervisory practices and address issues identified in the EBA's ongoing work on assessment of supervisory convergence.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Responds to Caius Capital LLP's Challenge Against Regulatory Capital Treatment of UniCredit CASHES
07/20/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a response following allegations by Caius Capital LLP that UniCredit S.p.A.'s regulatory capital treatment in respect of a 2008 issuance of convertible and subordinated hybrid equity-linked securities (CASHES), which had been sanctioned by regulators including the European Central Bank, was incorrect. On May 3, 2018, Caius wrote a letter to the EBA, asking it to open an investigation for a breach of EU law on the basis that the structure of the transaction called into question the eligibility of ordinary shares underlying the CASHES as CET1 capital under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. Caius has since published further letters restating and expanding upon its arguments that a portion of UniCredit's regulatory capital currently recognized as CET1 under the EU rules is ineligible for such classification.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Consults on Initial Evaluation of the Impact of Regulatory Reforms on Infrastructure Finance
07/18/2018
The Financial Stability Board is seeking feedback on an initial evaluation of the effects of the post-financial crisis regulatory reforms on infrastructure finance. The initial evaluation focuses on infrastructure finance provided by the financial sector, for which the financial regulatory reforms are of immediate relevance. The FSB has established a framework for assessing whether the reforms are achieving their intended outcomes and whether there are any material unintended consequences to be addressed.
The initial evaluation shows the results of a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Basel III reforms to regulatory capital and the OTC derivatives reforms. The results of a qualitative analysis of reforms that are at an earlier stage of implementation, such as investment funds rules and accounting standards, are also presented.
Feedback on the initial evaluation is invited by August 22, 2018. The FSB will consider the feedback in finalizing its report to the G20, due to be published towards the end of November 2018.
View the consultation paper. -
US Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Randal Quarles Discusses Streamlining the Supervision and Regulation of Large Financial Institutions
07/18/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Vice Chairman for Supervision, Randal Quarles, discussed the tailoring of supervision and regulation for large financial institutions. Vice Chairman Quarles noted that post-crisis regulations made the financial system demonstrably stronger and more resilient, and that there was some degree of tailoring that occurred in the initial creation of the post-crisis regulatory framework. Vice Chairman Quarles stressed that while steps have been taken since to improve the efficiency and efficacy of regulation, more can be done to streamline this framework. He noted that there are still improvements that can be made to allow for greater differentiation in the supervision and regulation of large firms and further tailoring, a theme he has reiterated in several prior speeches.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Oversight Council Announces Proposed Decision to not Apply "Hotel California" Provision to Large US National Bank
07/18/2018
The U.S. Financial Stability Oversight Council issued a proposed decision with respect to a national bank’s petition to not treat the surviving entity of a bank holding company parent merging into its large U.S. national bank subsidiary as a nonbank financial company supervised by the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to Section 117 of the Dodd Frank Act (commonly referred to as the “Hotel California” provision). Section 117 applies to any entity, or its successor entity, that received financial assistance under, or participated in, the Capital Purchase Plan established under the Troubled Asset Relief Program and was a bank holding company with total consolidated assets of at least $50 billion as of January 1, 2010.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Publish Proposed Changes to the Volcker Rule
07/17/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission published their previously announced notice of proposed rulemaking entitled Proposed Revisions to Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds in the Federal Register. The proposed rules seek to simplify and tailor the Volcker Rule. Comments to the proposal are due by September 17, 2018.
View proposed changes to the Volcker Rule.
View full text of the proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Court Annuls European Central Bank Leverage Ratio Decisions for Six Banks
07/13/2018
The General Court of the European Union has annulled decisions of the European Central Bank, refusing to allow six French banks to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio certain exposures connected to French savings accounts. Banque Postale, BPCE, Confédération Nationale du Crédit Mutual, Société Générale, Crédit Agricole and BNP Paribas applied to the ECB, as their direct prudential supervisor under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, for permission to exclude exposures consisting of sums in a number of savings accounts taken out with them and transferred to the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, a French public investment vehicle. National regulators and the ECB have discretion to allow banks to exclude exposures that satisfy a number of conditions from the calculation of the leverage ratio under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Secondary Legislation Adopted Amending Liquidity Coverage Requirement
07/13/2018
The European Commission has adopted an Amending Regulation to make amendments to an existing Delegated Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2015/61) supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation. The existing Delegated Regulation sets out detailed requirements on the Liquidity Coverage Requirement and specifies which assets are to be considered as liquid (so-called high quality liquid assets) and how the expected cash outflows and inflows over a 30-day stressed period are to be calculated.
The European Commission consulted on a draft of the Amending Regulation between January and February 2018. The Amending Regulation makes changes to the existing Delegated Regulation with the objective of improving its practical application, relating to:- full alignment of the calculation of the expected liquidity outflows and inflows on repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and collateral swaps transactions with the international liquidity standard developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision;
- treatment of certain reserves held with third-country central banks;
- waiver of the minimum issue size for certain non-EU liquid assets;
- the application of the unwind mechanism for the calculation of the liquidity buffer; and
- integration in the existing Delegated Regulation of the new criteria for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Provides Hurdle Rate Change Information for 2018 Stress Test
07/12/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a statement on Systemic Risk Buffers and Pillar 2A in stress test hurdle rates. The Bank of England announced in its March 2018 Key Elements of the 2018 Stress Test that it would be making four changes to the way hurdle rates are calculated. Hurdle rates are the level that a firm's capital ratio falls to during a stress scenario relative to the level of capital a firm is expected to maintain during the scenario. The PRA's statement provides details on two of the ways in which hurdle rates will change: (i) hurdle rates will incorporate buffers to capture domestic systemic importance, in addition to global systemic importance; and (ii) the calculation of minimum capital requirements (incorporated in the hurdle rates) will more accurately reflect how they would evolve in a real stress scenario.
The PRA has not commented on when further details of the other changes to hurdle rates will be published. The BoE expects to publish the results of the stress test in Q4 2018.
View the statement.
View details of the Key Elements of the 2018 stress test.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US FDIC Publishes Updates to Interagency Forms
07/11/2018
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced updates to four of its interagency forms: (i) the Biographical and Financial Report (OMB Control Number 3064-0006); (ii) the Bank Merger Act Application (OMB Control Number 3064-0015); (iii) the Notice of Change in Control form (OMB Control Number 3064-0019); and (iv) the Notice of Change in Director or Senior Executive Officer form (OMB Control Number 3064-0097). The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System also published updated versions of these forms (FR 2081c, FR 2070, FR 2081a and FR 2081b, respectively) to its website on July 11, 2018. The FDIC announcement notes that these updates are based upon the comments and recommendations of an interagency working group, comprised of representatives from the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The changes to the forms were made to improve the clarity of the specific information requested in the forms, provide additional transparency to financial institutions completing the forms, make changes to reflect new laws, regulations, capital requirements and accounting rules and to delete information requests that have been determined to be unnecessary. The changes to the FDIC forms are effective immediately.
View full text of the FDIC Financial Institution Letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulatory Technical Standards Published on Assessment Methodology For Use of Advanced Measurement Approaches for Calculating Operational Risk Capital Requirements
07/06/2018
A Commission Delegated Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation with Regulatory Technical Standards on the assessment methodology to be used by national regulators when deciding whether to permit institutions to use Advanced Measurement Approaches for operational risk. The RTS cover: (i) the qualitative and quantitative criteria that firms must meet before they are granted permission to use AMA models for calculating their capital requirements to cover operational risk; (ii) the criteria for the supervisory assessment of key methodological components of the operational risk measurement system; and (iii) common standards for the supervisory assessment of a bank’s operational risk governance.
The Delegated Regulation was made by the European Commission on March 14, 2018 and is based on final draft RTS submitted to the European Commission by the European Banking Authority in June 2015. The Delegated Regulation comes into effect across the EU on July 26, 2018. For institutions currently using AMA models or whose application to do so is pending, the Delegated Regulation will apply from July 26, 2019 and certain provisions related to correlation will not apply until July 26, 2020.
View the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/959.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Finalizes Revised Assessment Framework for G-SIBs
07/05/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a revised methodology and the higher loss absorbency (HLA) requirement for the assessment of Global Systemically Important Banks. The revised framework updates and replaces the Basel Committee's July 2013 publication, "Global systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement."
The Basel Committee committed, on the introduction of the G-SIB framework, to review the framework every three years. It consulted on potential enhancements to the framework between March and June 2017. Following feedback to that consultation, the Basel Committee is proposing no changes to the fundamental structure of the G-SIB framework and states that it is generally recognized that the G-SIB framework is meeting its primary objective of requiring systemically important banks to hold higher capital buffers. The framework is also providing incentives for G-SIBs to reduce their systemic importance.
The proposed revisions to enhance the framework include a timetable for implementation. The revised assessment methodology will apply from 2021, based on end-2020 data. The corresponding HLA requirements based on the revised methodology will apply from January 1, 2023.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Release Statements Regarding Implementation and Impact of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
07/05/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation released statements regarding the implementation and impact of the passage of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Policy Committee Outlines Steps to Reduce Risks to the UK's Financial Stability
07/03/2018
The Bank of England has published a Financial Stability Report, dated June 2018, and a record of the Financial Policy Committee Meeting held on June 19, 2018. The Report sets out the FPC's view of the U.K.'s financial stability, the resilience of the U.K.'s financial system and the risks posed to each of those. Where applicable, the Report also notes the steps that the FPC is taking to address the risks. The record of the meeting provides a summary of issues discussed by the FPC in June.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Consults on Materiality Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due
07/03/2018
The European Central Bank has launched a consultation on a proposed Regulation on the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR risk quantification provisions set out that a default occurs when an obligor is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to a firm, its parent or any of its subsidiaries. The materiality of the credit obligation is to be assessed against a threshold set by the national regulator according to its view of a reasonable level of risk. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and must set the materiality threshold for these banks. The ECB must take into account the Regulatory Technical Standards on the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due that supplement the CRR requirements on the conditions for use of the internal ratings-based approach.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Reflecting the Systemic Risk Buffer Framework Within the Leverage Ratio Framework for UK Systemic Ring-Fenced Bodies
07/03/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper entitled "UK leverage ratio: Applying the framework to systemic ring-fenced bodies and reflecting the systemic risk buffer."
The Systemic Risk Buffer is one of the elements of the overall capital framework for U.K. banks and building societies. It is applied by the PRA to individual institutions and will be introduced at the same time that ring-fencing comes into force in 2019. SRB institutions are banks falling within the definition of Ring-fenced Bodies in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and large building societies that hold more than £25 billion in deposits (where one or more of the accountholders is a small business) and shares (excluding deferred shares).
Read more. -
EU Draft Amended Technical Standards on Benchmarking of Internal Models
06/29/2018
The European Banking Authority has published amended draft Implementing Technical Standards specifying the benchmarking portfolios, templates and definitions to be used as part of the annual benchmarking exercise by those institutions that use internal approaches for market and credit risk under the EU Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA consulted on proposed changes to the ITS in Q4 2017 and Q1 2018.
The amended ITS include all the portfolios that will be used for the 2019 benchmarking exercise, provided that the amended ITS are adopted by the European Commission. For market risk benchmarking, major changes have been made to the portfolios, including the introduction of a new set of portfolios comprising vanilla instruments. Minor changes have been made to the credit risk portfolios including changes to the information requested from firms.
Regarding the 2018 benchmarking exercise, the EBA has confirmed that firms do not have to resubmit the same data as a result of the difference between the submission dates in the draft ITS published by the EBA and the final ITS published on May 18, 2018 in the Official Journal of the European Union.
View the amended ITS.
View details of the EBA's consultation on amending the ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Sets out Expectations on Firms' Exposures to Crypto-Assets
06/28/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a "Dear CEO" letter, addressed to the Chief Executive Officers of banks, insurance companies and designated investment firms. The purpose of the letter is to remind firms of their relevant obligations under the PRA rules and to communicate the PRA's expectations regarding firms' exposures to crypto-assets.
Crypto-assets have exhibited high price volatility and relative illiquidity and may also be vulnerable to fraud and manipulation, which raises concerns about potential misconduct and poses issues for market integrity. The PRA's letter does not define crypto-assets, but the Financial Conduct Authority uses this term to refer to any publicly available electronic medium of exchange that features a distributed ledger and a decentralized system for exchange. The FCA recently published a "Dear CEO" letter outlining best practice for firms in handling the financial crime risks that crypto-assets can pose.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulator Confirms Changes to Large Exposures Framework
06/28/2018
Following a consultation in October 2017, which closed on January 4, 2018, the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on changes to its large exposures framework.
The Policy Statement sets out the PRA's feedback on the responses received to its consultation. Respondents were largely supportive of the proposals. The PRA is implementing its proposals largely as consulted on, with only minor changes. The Policy Statement outlines the changes as follows:
(i) Changes to the relevant part of the PRA Rulebook on large exposures and regulatory reporting - the text of the changes is set out in a PRA Rulebook Instrument, "CRR Firms: Large Exposures Amendment Instrument".
(ii) An update to the PRA's supervisory statement on large exposures (SS16/13) to reflect the PRA's expectations on the resolution exemption and to provide additional guidance to firms on Core UK Group and Non-core Large Exposures Group permissions.
(iii) An update to the PRA's supervisory statement, Guidelines for completing regulatory reports (SS34/15), to remove the requirement to submit the UK integrated groups - large exposures data item (FSA018).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Updated Supervision Booklets
06/28/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has announced updates to a number of supervision booklets, including the "Bank Supervision Process," "Community Bank Supervision," "Compliance Management Systems" and "Large Bank Supervision" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook, and the "Federal Branches and Agencies Supervision" booklet. The updated booklets replace previously issued booklets of the same titles. The OCC also provided a table of previously issued bulletins and publications that have been rescinded and incorporated into the updated booklets. At a high level, the revisions and updates clarify the applicability of the booklets for financial institutions of differing size; add content with respect to asset management, including assessing Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering and Office of Foreign Assets Control compliance; incorporate aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act; make technical corrections, including clarified terminology and to reflect the integration of the Office of Thrift Supervision into the OCC; include revised concepts and references; and incorporate references to OCC issuances published since each booklet's last publication date.
View the full text of the OCC press release and revised booklets.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Vice Chairman for Supervision Discusses the Promotion of Global Financial Stability
06/27/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Vice Chairman for Supervision, Randal Quarles, discussed the importance of the promotion of global financial stability at the Utah Bankers Association 110th Annual Convention. Vice Chairman Quarles began by discussing financial stability in the United States, noting that the implementation of post-financial crisis reform is largely complete and is now in the process of being reviewed and revised to promote efficiency and efficacy. Vice Chairman Quarles also noted how this review and revision process is easing the regulatory burden on community and regional banks, through reforms such as the passage of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, the Bank Exams Tailored to Risk program and the implementation of a new streamlined Call Report form in 2017. With respect to global financial stability, Vice Chairman Quarles discussed the role of the Financial Stability Board, explaining that the FSB helps to improve access to information on an international scale and promote minimum standards in areas such as resolution planning. Vice Chairman Quarles also highlighted that while the FSB may set international regulatory standards, it has no enforcement powers and no legal authority to direct its members to act. Instead, the FSB promotes effective dialogue by functioning by consensus, which allows international stakeholders to have meaningful input in the decisions that are made.
View the full text of Vice Chairman Quarles's speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Updated Guidelines on Outsourcing by Financial Institutions
06/22/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements. The proposed Guidelines are intended to update and replace the outsourcing guidelines issued in 2006 (by the EBA's predecessor, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors) that applied to outsourcing by credit institutions. The proposed Guidelines will have a wider scope, applying to all financial institutions that are within the scope of the EBA's mandate, namely credit institutions and investment firms subject to the Capital Requirements Directive, payment institutions and electronic money institutions. The proposed Guidelines also integrate the recommendation on outsourcing to cloud service providers that was published by the EBA in December 2017.
The proposed Guidelines set out a definition of outsourcing in line with delegated legislation under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. They cover: (i) proportionality and group application; (ii) the nature of outsourcing arrangements; (iii) the applicable governance framework; (iv) the outsourcing process; and (v) guidelines on outsourcing addressed to competent authorities. A separate Annex provides an illustrative template that could be used for complying with the requirement in the proposed Guidelines to maintain a register of all outsourcing arrangements at institution and group level where applicable.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Updates Recommendations on Equivalence of Non-EU Confidentiality Regimes
06/20/2018
The European Banking Authority has published an updated Final Report on recommendations on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes under the Capital Requirements Directive. The Final Report was originally published in April 2015.
The EBA has added three third-country national regulators to the current list of third-country national regulators whose confidentiality regimes can be regarded as equivalent with those in the EU, following an assessment of the professional secrecy and confidentiality frameworks under which they operate.
The new entries are:- The Guernsey Financial Services Commission (the Bailiwick of Guernsey);
- The Superintendence of the Financial Services of the Central Bank of Uruguay (the Oriental Republic of Uruguay); and
- The Bank of Korea (the Republic of Korea).
The updated recommendations apply from June 21, 2018. The recommendations are intended to assist national regulators in the EU in their assessment of third-country equivalence with the aim of facilitating cooperation with third-country supervisory authorities and their participation in supervisory colleges overseeing international banks.
View the updated Final Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Updates its Asset Quality Review Manual
06/20/2018
The European Central Bank has published a revised version of its manual on the methodology for phase 2 of its Asset Quality Review, which forms part of the Comprehensive Assessment that the ECB and national regulators must make of relevant Eurozone banks under the EU Regulation on the Single Supervisory Mechanism. This revised version replaces the earlier version of the AQR manual published in 2014.
In Frequently Asked Questions published alongside the updated AQR manual, the ECB explains that the AQR manual has been updated to reflect the entry into force of the new accounting rules of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 on January 1, 2018. This has required some changes to the provisions of the AQR manual, in particular to incorporate new approaches to determining impairments and classifying financial instruments. The manual has also been updated to reflect their view that bank business models focused on investment services have become increasingly important for ECB Banking Supervision, in particular in the context of Brexit.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Use of Purchased Receivables Approach for Capital Requirements for Securitized Exposures
06/19/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions to allow institutions to calculate capital requirements, including on expected loss, arising from securitized exposures (known as KIRB) in accordance with the purchased receivables approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
As part of the new EU Securitization framework that will apply from January 1, 2019, an Amending Regulation makes amendments to the CRR to revise the capital requirements for securitizations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Issues Annual Report for 2017
06/18/2018
The European Banking Authority has published its Annual Report for 2017.
The Annual Report summarizes the progress made in a number of workstreams undertaken by the EBA in 2017, including the EBA's work on: (i) developing and maintaining an EU Single Rulebook for banking; (ii) promoting supervisory convergence; (iii) developing resolution policies and promoting common approaches for the resolution of failing financial institutions; (iv) determining and monitoring key risks in the banking sector across Europe; (v) strengthening the EBA's role as EU data hub for the collection, use and dissemination of banking data; (vi) protecting consumers, monitoring financial innovation and contributing to easy retail payments in the EU; (vii) Brexit preparations; (viii) international engagement; and (ix) cross-sectoral work by the European Supervisory Authorities under the Joint Committee.
Read more. -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Clarifications Regarding CRA Evaluation
06/15/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has issued clarifying guidance with respect to the examination and evaluation of institutions under the Community Reinvestment Act. The bulletin issued by the OCC notes that clarifications with respect to CRA evaluation processes were previously communicated to examiners, and that effective June 1, 2018, the OCC rescinded its previous "Large Bank CRA Examiner Guidance," issued December 29, 2000 (OCC Bulletin 2000-35). The OCC bulletin provides clarification with respect to a number of aspects of the CRA evaluation process, including the frequency and timing of CRA performance evaluations, the applicable CRA performance evaluation period, full-scope and limited-scope reviews, the evaluation of various components of CRA evaluations and the timing for the finalization of CRA performance evaluations when there is an open investigation regarding potential discriminatory or other illegal credit practices. The OCC bulletin also outlines the guidance provided to examiners with respect to CRA evaluations, including the factors to consider in the evaluation process, communication with supervised institutions during the evaluation process and the presentation and analysis of performance data.
View the full text of the OCC bulletin.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Discusses Agency Priorities before House and Senate Committees
06/14/2018
U.S. Comptroller of the Currency Joseph M. Otting has discussed the priorities of the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee and U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Comptroller Otting identified the following as his key priorities: modernizing the OCC's approach to the Community Reinvestment Act, encouraging institutions to meet the short-term, small-dollar credit needs of their customers, enhancing Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance, simplifying regulatory capital requirements, simplifying the Volcker Rule and promoting efficacy and efficiency in the supervisory activities of the OCC.
View the full text of Comptroller Otting’s prepared testimony before the two committees, here, here and here.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Approves Final Rule Regarding Single-Counterparty Credit Limits for Bank Holding Companies and Foreign Banking Organizations
06/14/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved a final rule, which implements section 165(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act, and establishes single-counterparty credit limits for bank holding companies and foreign banking organizations with $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets (including any U.S. intermediate holding company of these foreign banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets) and any other bank holding company classified by the Federal Reserve Board as a global systemically important bank.
Under the final rule, a U.S. GSIB cannot have aggregate net credit exposure to another single global systemically important banking organization or a nonbank financial company supervised by the Federal Reserve Board that exceeds 15% of its tier 1 capital, and cannot have aggregate net credit exposure that exceeds 25% of its tier 1 capital to any other counterparty (defined under the final rule to include a company (including any consolidated affiliates of the company); a natural person (including the person's immediate family collectively where the exposure to the natural person exceeds 5% of the institution's tier 1 capital); a U.S. state (including all of its agencies, instrumentalities, and political subdivisions); foreign sovereign entities that are not assigned a zero risk weighting under the risk-based capital rules (including their agencies and instrumentalities); and political subdivisions of foreign sovereign entities (including their agencies and instrumentalities)). Other financial institutions subject to the final rule (other than U.S. IHCs subject to the rule) cannot have aggregate net credit exposure to any other counterparty that exceeds 25% of an institution's tier 1 capital.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Confirms its Approach to MREL Reporting
06/13/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on reporting the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities and an updated Supervisory Statement "Resolution Planning", following a consultation which ran from January 8 to April 9, 2018. MREL is a minimum requirement for firms to maintain equity and eligible debt liabilities that can bear losses before and in resolution and results in a top up to standard regulatory capital requirements, similar in concept to the old Tier 3 requirements under Basel II. The requirement will apply to U.K. authorized banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, parent undertakings of those firms that are financial holding companies and to U.K. authorized subsidiaries of such firms. The MREL requirement is the EU implementation, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board.
Read more. -
Bank of England Confirms its Approach to Setting Internal MREL in Groups
06/13/2018
The Bank of England has published a Policy Statement setting out its feedback to the responses it received to its October 2017 consultation on its approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities. MREL is a minimum requirement for firms to maintain equity and eligible debt liabilities that can bear losses before and in resolution and results in a top-up to standard regulatory capital requirements, similar in concept to the old Tier 3 requirements under Basel II. The requirement will apply to U.K. authorized banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, parent undertakings of those firms that are financial holding companies and to U.K. authorized subsidiaries of such firms. The MREL requirement is the EU implementation, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board.
The BoE's October 2017 consultation set out proposals for changes to the BoE's 2016 Statement of Policy on its approach to setting "external" MREL for resolution entities, to include the BoE's approach to "internal" MREL, i.e. instruments that are issued to a resolution entity from other legal entities in a group. Internal MREL is intended to cover U.K.-headquartered banking groups as well as U.K. subsidiaries of overseas banking groups.
Read more. -
Financial Stability Board Seeks Comment on Technical Implementation of TLAC
06/06/2018
The Financial Stability Board is seeking feedback on the technical implementation of standards on the adequacy of total loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity for Global Systemically Important Banks in resolution - the TLAC Standard. The FSB wants to assess whether implementation aligns with the timelines and objectives set out in the TLAC Standard. The TLAC Standard is being phased in, with G-SIBs expected to reach the first minimum requirement by January 1, 2019.
The FSB is due to report to the G20 on the implementation of TLAC by the end of 2019. The comments provided in response to the call for feedback will help the FSB to prepare that report. The FSB highlights that the objective of the call for feedback is to monitor implementation by jurisdictions of the TLAC Standard and to identify whether there are any technical issues or operational challenges in implementation. The aim is not to seek views on the substantive aspects of the standard or whether any changes should be made to it. The FSB will consider whether further implementation guidance is needed based on the feedback.
The FSB requests views and evidence on:
1. the regulatory adoption of the TLAC principles and Term Sheet;
2. cross-border aspects of the implementation of the TLAC Standard;
3. G-SIBs' issuance strategies and overall progress towards meeting external and internal TLAC requirements;
4. distribution of TLAC instruments and liabilities in the market; and
5. any technical issues or material factors impacting implementation of the TLAC Standard.
Responses to the call for feedback should be submitted via email by August 20, 2018.
View the call for feedback. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's 2018-2019 Work Program
06/05/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published its 2018-2019 work program, setting out its focus areas for policy development, supervision, implementation and monitoring. Industry will welcome the news that the Committee intends to adopt a limited number of new policy initiatives, concentrating primarily on cyber risk, operational resilience and proportionality. On the implementation of the Committee's post-crisis reforms, one of the more immediate actions will be to finalize the revised market risk framework, which is due to be implemented by January 1, 2022. Other revisions to be finalized include the assessment framework for Global Systemically Important Banks and the Pillar 3 disclosure framework. Other work will include:- Furthering discussions on the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures.
- Continuing to promote strong supervision, which will involve holding discussion sessions and workshops on emerging challenges for supervision, such as how supervisors should comprehensively assess risks when banks change their business models, oversight of third-party origination practices and oversight of risk management practices, in particular, lending standards, collateral management and valuation practices.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Propose First Major Revisions to Volcker Rule
06/05/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission released for public comment a proposal that would simplify and tailor the Volcker Rule. The joint notice of proposed rulemaking includes 342 specific questions for public comment largely focused on reducing compliance burdens under the Volcker Rule.
Read more. -
Transitional Periods Further Extended for Own Funds Requirements for Exposures to CCPs
06/04/2018
A Commission Implementing Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, following a consultation by the European Commission in April 2018 which closed on May 15, 2018. The Commission Implementing Regulation extends the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to CCPs that are set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation.
Thirty-two third-country CCPs have been recognized by the European Securities and Markets Authority to date. However, a number of third-country CCPs are still awaiting recognized status and their recognition process is not scheduled to be completed by the expiry of the existing CRR and EMIR transitional periods on June 15, 2018. Without an extension of the transitional periods, banks and investment firms in the EU (or which are subject to consolidated supervision in the EU) would need to increase their own funds requirements for their exposures to those CCPs that are awaiting recognized status.
The Commission Implementing Regulation takes effect on June 7, 2018 and will apply directly across the EU. The effect of the Commission Implementing Regulation is to extend the transitional periods by a further six months, to expire on December 15, 2018.
View the Commission Implementing Regulation ((EU) 2018/815).Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Authorities Raise Concerns About Proposed Data Waiver for Non-Performing Loans
06/01/2018
The European Banking Authority and the European Central Bank have written to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union expressing concerns about the impact of proposed data waivers for non-performing loans. The letter refers to a proposal put forward by certain stakeholders, in particular the Bank of Italy, that losses due to the sale of NPLs should be permanently eliminated from the dataset used for the Loss Given Default (LGD) estimation for the firm disposing of the NPLs. The proposal is based on the belief by some stakeholders that the disposal of NPLs and the corresponding capital release is hindered by the regulatory framework for internal models, in particular the requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation for LGD estimation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Updates Guide to Management Body Fit and Proper Assessments
05/28/2018
The European Central Bank has published an updated Guide to Fit and Proper assessments for the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders in significant institutions. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB Guide covers fit and proper assessments of members of management bodies, both in their management function (executives) and supervisory function (non-executives). It applies to all institutions under the direct supervision of the ECB, namely in-scope credit institutions, financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies. In the context of licensing or qualifying holdings, the ECB Guide will also apply to less significant institutions.
The ECB Guide has been updated following the publication of the joint European Banking Authority and European Securities and Markets Authority Guidelines on the suitability of management body members and key function holders, which will apply from June 30, 2018, and the EBA Guidelines on Internal Governance.
Read more. -
US President Trump Signs Dodd-Frank Act Reform Bill
05/24/2018
U.S. President Trump signed into law the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act; the first major financial services reform bill since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. While the act is not a wholesale repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act, and does not offer the broad regulatory relief that was proposed under the Financial Choice Act of 2017, it does modify or eliminate certain requirements on community and regional banks and nonbank financial institutions in particular that have been perceived to be especially burdensome. The key aspect of the act may be the increase, from $50 billion to $250 billion, of the threshold at which a large banking organization automatically becomes subject to enhanced prudential standards. The act contains several other important provisions, including: exempting banks with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets from the Volcker Rule and easing certain fund naming restrictions under the Volcker Rule; exempting certain deposits held by custodial banks from the calculation of the supplementary leverage ratio; reducing reporting and supervision requirements applicable to community banks; and easing certain securities law requirements. Many of the provisions in the act are self-executing, although a number of other provisions require positive action to be taken by U.S. federal financial regulatory agencies.
View more detailed discussion of the act.
View full text of the act.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Publishes its Spring Semiannual Risk Perspective
05/24/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced the publication of its spring 2018 Semiannual Risk Perspective. The OCC report discusses risks facing national banks and federal savings associations and provides high-level overviews of the economic operating environment, bank performance, and trends in supervisory actions. The report highlights key risks in three areas: easing underwriting practices with respect to credit underwriting practices, elevated operational risk, due, in part, to cybersecurity and increased use of third-party service providers, and compliance risk, particularly with respect to high BSA/AML/OFAC compliance risk, changing regulatory landscape and evolving risks outpacing compliance management systems. The report also focuses on risk that is emerging with respect to rising interest rates and their effect on increased uncertainty in deposits. With respect to trends in supervisory actions, the report notes that the number of banks with composite ratings of 4 or 5 have declined year-over-year through the end of 2017, that the number of outstanding matters requiring attention has been declining over the past few years, and that the number of outstanding enforcement actions has declined since 2010.
View full text of the OCC report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Standards for Estimating and Identifying an Economic Downturn in IRB Modelling
05/22/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched two consultations on standards for estimation and identification of an economic downturn in Internal Ratings Based modelling.
The first consultation sets out draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation. The nature of the economic downturn is defined as a set of relevant economic factors and its severity is specified via the most severe values observed on the relevant economic factors over a given historical period. The duration of an economic downturn is specified using the concept of a "downturn period", namely the period of time where the peaks or troughs, which relate to the most severe values of one or several economic factors, are observed. The aim of the RTS is to ensure that institutions using the IRB approach can use a well-defined and common specification of the nature, duration and severity of an economic downturn for portfolios relating to comparable types of exposure.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Its Approach to New EU Securitization Framework and Significant Risk Transfer
05/22/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Consultation Paper, setting out the PRA's proposals on its approach to supervision under the new EU securitization framework that will take effect from January 1, 2019. The incoming EU framework consists of: (i) the Securitization Regulation, which imposes general requirements for all EU securitization activity and outlines the criteria and process for designating certain securitizations as "Simple, Transparent and Standardised"; and (ii) revisions to the banking securitization capital framework within the Capital Requirements Regulation.
Read more. -
EU Secondary Legislation Published on the Exclusion of Transactions With Non-EU Non-Financial Counterparties From Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Charges
05/18/2018
A Commission Delegated Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, setting out Regulatory Technical Standards on procedures for excluding from the own funds requirement for credit valuation adjustment risk transactions with non-financial counterparties that are established in a third country and that do not hold positions over the clearing threshold under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (so called NFC-s). The RTS supplement the requirements of the Capital Requirements Regulation.
Under the CRR, transactions between an institution and a NFC- are excluded from the own funds requirements for CVA risk, irrespective of whether that NFC- is established in the EU or in a third country. As NFC-s established in third countries are not subject directly to EU regulation, the RTS clarify that EU firms are responsible for: (i) taking the necessary steps to identify all NFC-s under this exemption and calculating accordingly their own funds requirements for CVA risk; (ii) ensuring that exempt counterparties established outside the EU would qualify as NFC-s if they were established in the EU; and (iii) ensuring that counterparties calculate the clearing threshold according to the relevant provisions in EMIR and do not exceed those thresholds.
Read more. -
EU Implementing Regulation Published for Revised Benchmarking Portfolios, Reporting Templates and Reporting Instructions under the Capital Requirements Directive
05/18/2018
A Commission Implementing Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, setting out changes to Implementing Technical Standards contained in a Commission Implementing Regulation published in 2016. The ITS cover benchmarking portfolios, reporting templates and reporting instructions for the purposes of the supervisory benchmarking exercise under the Capital Requirements Directive. The benchmarking exercise is conducted at least annually to assess the internal approaches used by firms for calculating own funds. The European Banking Authority consulted on the proposed revisions to the ITS in a consultation which closed in January 2018 and subsequently submitted draft revised ITS to the European Commission, on which provisions of the Amending Regulation are based.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
International Bodies Publish Identification Criteria and Capital Treatment for Simple, Transparent and Comparable Short-Term Securitizations
05/14/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organization of Securities Commissions have published an updated version of the sound practices document, "Criteria for identifying simple, transparent and comparable short-term securitisations", which was originally published in 2015. The Basel Committee has also published an updated version of its standards document, "Capital treatment for simple, transparent and comparable short-term securitisations".
The Basel Committee and IOSCO consulted on the proposed updated Criteria in July 2017. The Basel Committee consulted at the same time on proposed additional guidance and requirements for the purpose of applying preferential regulatory capital treatment for banks acting as investors in, or as sponsors of, STC short-term securitizations, typically in asset-backed commercial paper structures.
Read more. -
Eurozone Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting Needs Strengthening
05/08/2018
The European Central Bank has published a report on the thematic review on effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. The ECB launched the thematic review in 2016 to carry out an in-depth assessment of credit institutions' governance, data aggregation capabilities and reporting practices. The thematic review was based on 25 Eurozone significant institutions and took into account the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting.
The ECB has ascertained that implementation of the Basel Committee's principles is unsatisfactory and that the issues are mostly as a result of a lack of clarity around responsibility for data quality. The ECB considers that further efforts are needed to enhance the effectiveness of risk data aggregation and risk reporting.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Approves Amendments to Regulation A
05/07/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved final amendments to Regulation A (Extensions of Credit by Federal Reserve Banks). The amendments make technical changes to provisions regarding establishing the primary credit rate in a financial emergency and delete obsolete provisions of Regulation A. With respect to the former, Regulation A will be amended to provide that in a financial emergency (defined as “a significant disruption to the U.S. money markets resulting from an act of war, military or terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other catastrophic event”), the primary credit rate will be the target federal funds rate or, if the Federal Open Market Committee has established a target range for the federal funds rate, a rate corresponding to the top of the target range. The amendments also delete references to credit ratings for Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facilities, given that the program has expired. The amendments to Regulation A will take effect on June 8, 2018.
View full text of the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority to Provide Technical Advice on Implementation of Final Basel III Reforms
05/07/2018
The European Banking Authority has announced that the European Commission had requested technical advice on implementing the final Basel III reforms into EU law. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the final revisions to Basel III on December 7, 2017. The revisions cover the standardized approach and the Internal Ratings-Based approach for credit risk, the Credit Valuation Adjustment risk framework, the leverage ratio framework, including the introduction of a leverage buffer for Global Systemically Important Banks, the operational risk framework and the new output ratio floor. The revised standards will take effect from January 1, 2022, except for the output floor which may be phased-in until January 1, 2027.
The Commission has asked the EBA to provide technical advice on the potential impact of the revisions on the EU banking sector and the wider EU economy and on any potential implementation challenges. The Commission has also requested that the EBA consider the potential changes to the Basel market risk framework, on which the Basel Committee is currently consulting.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman for Supervision Randal Quarles Discusses Liquidity Regulation and the Federal Reserve Board’s Balance Sheet
05/04/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Vice Chairman for Supervision Randal Quarles discussed the relationship between liquidity and other post-crisis regulation and the Federal Reserve Board’s balance sheet.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Finalizes Policy on Groups and Double Leverage
04/30/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement setting out its proposals to amend the Groups policy framework it has in place for the application of prudential standards to firms on an individual and consolidated basis within banking groups.
The PRA consulted between October 2017 and January 2018 on proposals to enable: (i) assessment and mitigation of the risks to group resilience due to the use of "double leverage" (which occurs when one or more parent entities in a group funds some of the capital in its subsidiaries by raising debt or lower forms of capital externally); (ii) assessment and mitigation of the risks highlighted by prudential requirements applied by local national regulators on overseas subsidiaries of U.K. consolidation groups; and (iii) improved monitoring of the distribution of financial resources across different group entities.
Following feedback received, the PRA has made three changes to the proposals, which it does not consider to be significant changes. The first and second changes affect the PRA Supervisory Statement, "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" by: (a) changing the definition of "double leverage" so that it is accounting based to reflect the reporting practices of stand-alone holding companies; and (b) clarifying the level of application of the double leverage formula. The third change affects the PRA Statement of Policy, "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital" by amending the formula for double leverage.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Finalizes Model Risk Management Principles for Stress Testing
04/30/2018
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement and a finalized Supervisory Statement following a consultation which ran from December 2017 to March 2018 on model risk management principles for stress testing. In the consultation, the PRA proposed that firms that use stress testing models, and that participate in the Bank of England's annual concurrent stress test, should follow in full a set of four proposed principles when establishing and adopting risk management practices in relation to their models. Firms not participating in the BoE's annual stress test should instead seek to apply the four principles on a proportionate basis, taking into account their size, complexity, risk profile and the relevance to the firm of using stress test models.
The Policy Statement sets out feedback on the three responses it received to the consultation. The PRA has made a number of changes to the consultation draft of the Supervisory Statement to address issues raised by respondents. In particular, the PRA has made changes to the wording of Principles 1.2 (Model Inventory), 2.1 (Board oversight), 2.3 (Model developers, owners, users and control functions), 3.1 (Model purpose and design), 3.7 (Business Involvement), 3.8 (Model uncertainty), 3.9 (Model Monitoring), 4.1 (Scope and validation of review) and 4.2 (Independence). In addition, it has included a further section in the Supervisory Statement to set out its expectations on the application of materiality considerations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Confirms Revised Pillar 2 Reporting Requirements
04/30/2018
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement confirming that updated Pillar 2 reporting requirements will apply from October 1, 2018 for banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. This follows the PRA's consultation on the proposed updates, which ran from December 6, 2017 to March 5, 2018. The PRA proposed a new data item to capture stress-testing data currently included in firms' Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process documents. This change aims to increase transparency and comparability in stress test data provided alongside ICAAP documents and to decrease the operational risks associated with capturing stress test data manually. The PRA also proposed reducing the frequency of reporting of the data items in the Reporting Pillar 2 part of the PRA Rulebook for some firms as well as consolidating the definition of several reporting parts of the PRA Rulebook into the Glossary.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Guidelines on Disclosure of Non-Performing and Forborne Exposures
04/27/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Guidelines on disclosure of non-performing and forborne exposures. Since the 2007/08 financial crisis, there has been a build-up of non-performing loans in the EU, which impacts banks' viability and lending capabilities. The European authorities have agreed various actions to tackle NPLs in Europe, resulting in several recent steps being taken by the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the EBA.
The proposed Guidelines set out the content, format and frequency of disclosures for non-performing exposures, forborne exposures and foreclosed assets. The draft Guidelines would apply to all banks that are subject to any of the disclosure requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation and would apply to all exposures that fall within the definition of either non-performing or forbearance in the ITS on Supervisory Reporting (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014). The level and frequency of disclosure will depend on the significance of a firm and the level of NPEs.
The draft Guidelines should be read with the EBA's proposed Guidelines on sound risk management practices for banks for managing NPEs, FBEs and foreclosed assets.
As with the proposed risk management Guidelines, the EBA intends to publish the finalized disclosure Guidelines before the end of 2018 and for the Guidelines to apply from January 1, 2019. Feedback on the proposed Guidelines can be provided by June 27, 2018. The EBA is holding a public hearing on the draft Guidelines on June 27, 2018.
View the consultation paper.
View the EBA's proposed Guidelines on sound risk management practices for NPEs.
View the Commission's proposals to address the build-up of NPLs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Clarification on Scope of EMIR Obligations for Public Entity Clearing Members Needed
04/27/2018
The Chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority, Steven Maijoor, has written to the European Commission recommending that clarification of certain provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation should be made during the current revision of EMIR. EMIR requires clearing members of CCPs to provide initial margin and default fund contributions. ESMA has noticed that CCPs across the EU, as well as their national regulators, are adopting different approaches to these requirements for public entities. Some CCPs and national regulators exempt public entity clearing members from the requirement to provide initial margin and default fund contributions while others grant no exemptions.
ESMA requests the Commission to consider whether the scope of EMIR needs to be clarified and whether a specific amendment could be made to EMIR during the current review process.
The European Commission published legislative proposals to amend EMIR in May - the technical revisions in so-called EMIR 2.1 - and June 2017 - the Brexit-driven CCP "location policy" or so-called EMIR 2.2, which attempts to force the relocation of UK CCPs to the Eurozone. The legislative procedures to finalize those changes are ongoing.
View the letter.
View the Commission's technical amendments legislative proposal.
View the Commission's location policy legislative proposal. -
European Commission Adopts Revised Implementing Technical Standards on Mapping of External Credit Ratings
04/24/2018
A Commission Implementing Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Amending Regulation, which takes effect on May 15, 2018, revises a Commission Implementing Regulation adopted in October 2016 under the Capital Requirements Regulation.
Under the CRR, firms that use the Standardised Approach for the purposes of calculating their capital requirements for credit risk can use external credit assessments to determine the credit quality of exposures. These external credit assessments must be made by External Credit Assessment Institutions. ECAIs are either credit rating agencies registered under the CRA Regulation or central banks that issue credit ratings (which are exempt from the application of the CRA Regulation). The 2016 Implementing Regulation set out Implementing Technical Standards for the mapping of the credit quality of exposures (obtained from ECAIs) to their corresponding risk weights.
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities consulted in July 2017 on the need to make changes to the 2016 Implementing Regulation to reflect the fact that, since it was adopted, five additional ECAIs had been recognized and one ECAI had been de-registered. The Joint Committee submitted draft revised ITS to the Commission in December 2017 and the Commission has adopted them in the Amending Regulation.
View the Amending Regulation ((EU) 2018/634).
View details of the July 2017 consultation. -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Progress Report on Basel III Implementation
04/23/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published its 14th progress report on implementation of the Basel III prudential framework, based on responses from Basel Committee member jurisdictions, and reports the status as of the end of March 2018. The Report sets out in tabular form the results of the Basel Committee's monitoring of the adoption progress of all Basel III standards agreed to date, which will come into effect by 2022. The table omits details of those Basel III standards that have already been implemented by all Basel Committee member jurisdictions. It sets out the ongoing implementation progress of each member jurisdiction on aspects of the risk-based capital standards, leverage ratio requirements, liquidity requirements, the requirements for systemically important banks, interest rate risk in the banking book, the supervisory framework for large exposures and the Pillar 3 disclosure requirements.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Toolkit to Abate Misconduct Risk
04/20/2018
The Financial Stability Board has published a report, "Strengthening Governance Frameworks to Mitigate Misconduct Risk: A Toolkit for Firms and Supervisors." The report is part of the FSB's work on measures to reduce misconduct in the financial sector and follows the FSB's stocktake of endeavors by international bodies, national authorities, industry associations and firms.
The Toolkit is designed to provide firms and authorities with a set of tools that can be used, taking into account the applicable legislative, judicial and regulatory frameworks. Rather than creating an international standard or adopting a prescriptive approach, the FSB's Toolkit allows firms and supervisors to decide whether and how to use the Toolkit to address misconduct risk. The FSB also states that firms and their supervisors can use individual tools separately or in combination.
The Toolkit comprises 19 tools, divided into three categories and assigned between firms and national authorities.
Read more. -
US Federal Reserve Board Governor Lael Brainard Discusses Cyclical Regulation
04/19/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Governor Lael Brainard spoke at the Global Finance Forum regarding maintaining resiliency across economic cycles. Governor Brainard drew comparisons between the current state of the economy and the economy prior to the financial crisis, noting positive growth, but highlighting elevated risks in asset valuation and business leverage. Governor Brainard discussed that post-crisis regulation has greatly improved the capital and liquidity positions of financial institutions, and highlighted the importance of maintaining a dynamic capital regime, but cautioned against purely backward-looking analysis, rather than proactively seeking out emerging risks. Governor Brainard discussed the importance of properly tailoring and calibrating existing regulations, such as the countercyclical capital buffer rule, but also stressed the importance of implementing additional critical regulatory elements, such as finalizing the net stable funding ratio, which she noted was close to finalization, and the Dodd-Frank Act limits on large counterparty exposure. Governor Brainard also expressed her support for improving the efficiency of the Volcker Rule without undermining its efficacy, and for moving forward with minimum haircuts for securities financing transactions. Governor Brainard distinguished these regulations, designed to promote the resiliency of large financial institutions, with the regulation of smaller institutions, suggesting that with respect to the latter, regulations should be appropriately tailored to reduce regulatory burden.
View full text of Governor Brainard's speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman for Supervision Randal Quarles Delivers Semi-Annual Supervision and Regulation Testimony to Congress
04/19/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Vice Chairman for Supervision Randal Quarles testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs regarding the Federal Reserve Board’s regulation and supervision of financial institutions. Vice Chairman Quarles submitted identical remarks to the U.S. House Financial Services Committee two days earlier on April 17, 2018.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US and UK Establish Financial Regulatory Working Group
04/19/2018
The U.S. Treasury Department and HM Treasury have issued a joint statement announcing the establishment of a Financial Regulatory Working Group. The Working Group will be a forum for treasury staff and financial regulatory authorities to exchange views on the regulatory relationship between the United States and the U.K. The objectives of the Working Group will be to further financial regulatory cooperation, improve transparency, reduce regulatory uncertainty, identify possible cross-border implementation issues, address regulatory arbitrage and work towards achieving compatibility of U.S. and U.K. laws and regulations.
View the statement. -
US Federal Reserve Board Governor Lael Brainard Discusses Modernization of the Community Reinvestment Act
04/17/2018
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Governor Lael Brainard spoke at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Baltimore Community Development Gathering regarding efforts to modernize the Community Reinvestment Act. Governor Brainard provided a brief summary of the history and importance of the CRA, noting that the current CRA regulations date back to 1995 and are in need of update to better reflect how banks currently operate and the customer base they serve, given structural and technological changes in the banking industry.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Propose Revisions to Capital Rules to Reflect Change in US AAP Relating to Credit Losses
04/17/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced proposed revisions to the agencies’ regulatory capital rules to reflect changes to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles regarding credit losses. The proposed revisions will identify which of the new credit loss allowances will be eligible for inclusion in a financial institution’s regulatory capital. The proposal will further provide for an optional transition period that will allow financial institutions to phase in the adverse effects on certain regulatory capital components over a three-year period. The proposal also seeks to amend the stress testing regulations to allow covered institutions that have adopted these changes to U.S. GAAP to not include the effects from adopting this new standard until the 2020 stress test cycle. The proposed amendment will also make conforming changes, including with respect to certain definitions, disclosures and regulatory reporting forms. Comments to the proposal are due 60 days from the proposal’s publication in the Federal Register.
View full text of the agencies’ proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Draft Guidelines on the Exposures to be Associated With High Risk
04/17/2018
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Guidelines on certain types of exposures and the circumstances in which they can be categorized as being associated with high risk for regulatory capital purposes. The Capital Requirements Regulation provides that when firms use the Standardised Approach for determining minimum capital requirements for credit risk, risk weightings must be allocated to an exposure, based on its exposure class. One of the exposure classes is "exposures associated with particularly high risk," which are: investments in venture capital firms or private equity, speculative immovable property financing and investments in Alternative Investment Funds where the fund's mandate allows a higher leverage than required in the UCITS Directive. An exposure that is of particularly high risk receives a risk weight of 150%.
The EBA's mandate is to prepare guidelines on the types of exposures other than those set out in the CRR that must be associated with particularly high risk and under which circumstances. The EBA's draft Guidelines aim to implement that mandate by specifying that firms should classify exposures as items of high risk where the exposure has a "high risk of loss due to being structurally different from common exposures of the same asset class." The EBA provides a list of those exposures that would fall within the scope of this category.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Again Extending the Transitional Measures for Exposures to CCPs
04/17/2018
The European Commission has published a legislative proposal to extend until December 15, 2018 the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to CCPs set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Market Infrastructure Regulation. Thirty-two third-country CCPs have been recognized by the European Securities and Markets Authority to date. However, there are still third-country CCPs that are awaiting recognition status. Without an extension of the transitional periods, banks and investment firms in the EU (or which are subject to consolidated supervision in the EU) would need to increase their own funds requirements for their exposures to those CCPs that are not yet recognized.
Feedback on the proposal can be provided until May 15, 2018.
The proposals to amend the CRR include an amendment to these transitional provisions. The proposed amendment would remove the need for the European Commission to continuously extend the transitional period by basing the transitional deadline instead on the timing of an application for recognition by a third-country CCP.
View the proposed ITS and the consultation feedback page.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Make Recommendations to Address Risks in EU Securities, Banking and Insurance Sectors
04/12/2018
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities has published a report on risks and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system. The ESAs are the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The ESAs make recommendations for policy actions by the ESAs, national regulators and financial institutions. A summary of the risks and recommendations contained in the report is set out below.- To combat cyber risks, the ESAs recommend that financial institutions should continue to improve IT systems, explore risks in the context of information security and take steps to resolve risks surrounding connectivity and outsourcing to third-party providers. The ESAs will continue to keep these risks under review. ESMA is launching a supervisory project on cloud computing outsourcing and will continue work to address supervisory convergence. The EBA is developing guidelines on the management of information and communication technology risks. EIOPA is conducting a qualitative exercise on cyber risk with national regulators and the industry.
-
Two US Banking Regulators Propose Amendments to Supplementary Leverage Ratio Calculations for GSIBs and Their Insured Depository Institution Subsidiaries
04/11/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published a joint notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comment that would modify the calculation of the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio for U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies and certain of their insured depository institutions subsidiaries regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and OCC.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Two US Banking Regulators Propose Amendments to Supplementary Leverage Ratio Calculations for GSIBs and Their Insured Depository Institution Subsidiaries
04/11/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published a joint notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comment that would modify the calculation of the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio for U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies and certain of their insured depository institutions subsidiaries regulated by the Federal Reserve Board and OCC.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Proposes to Integrate its Regulatory Capital and Stress Test Rules for Large Banks
04/10/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System published a notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comment intended to integrate its capital and stress rules and thereby simplify the capital regime applicable to bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets and to the U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banking organizations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Compensation Trends in EU Credit Institutions and Investment Firms
04/10/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a report entitled "Benchmarking of remuneration practices at the European Union level and data on high earners." The report sets out the EBA's analysis of the compensation data provided to it by national regulators for 2016, which the EBA has compared with data from 2015 and 2014. The Capital Requirements Directive requires the EBA to benchmark remuneration trends in credit institutions and investment firms at EU level and to publish aggregated data on high earners earning EUR 1 million or more per financial year. National regulators are required to collect the relevant information from credit institutions and investment firms and to submit it to the EBA.
The analysis shows a slight decrease in 2016 in the number of high earners paid EUR 1 million or more. There was also a significant decrease in the number of identified staff subject to a cap on the ratio of fixed to variable compensation, although the EBA notes that this was due to a significant reduction by two banks of their numbers of identified staff. The EBA also notes that the supervisory framework for compensation practices is still not sufficiently harmonized, with significant differences among Member States and among institutions in the application of deferral and payout in instruments.
Read more. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes its 2018/19 Business Plan
04/09/2018
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published its Business Plan for 2018/19 which sets out its strategic goals and workplan to deliver those goals. The PRA also published a consultation paper on its fees and levies for 2018/19 alongside the Business Plan as well as a report to the Prudential Regulation Committee on the adequacy of PRA resources and independence of PRA functions.
Read a summary of the PRA's goals and workplan. -
European Commission Reports on the Potential Procyclical Effects of the EU Regulatory Capital Framework
04/09/2018
The European Commission has published a report on the effects of the EU regulatory capital framework on the economic cycle. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the Commission to assess periodically whether risk-sensitive regulatory requirements contained in the CRR and the Capital Requirements Directive create unintended procyclical effects and to consider whether it would be appropriate to implement any remedies. The report is addressed to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and was prepared in cooperation with the European Banking Authority, the European Systemic Risk Board and Member States.
The Commission analyzed whether capital ratio requirements are procyclical and, if so, if they have an impact of the level of capital held by banks. The Commission has concluded that there is only weak evidence of any procyclical effects resulting from the requirements in CRR and CRD. The EU regulatory framework already provides various tools that deal with procyclical effects, such as the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer, the leverage ratio and risk weight adjustments for specific exposures. The Commission does not consider that any major changes to the EU framework are required at this time.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Department of the Treasury Releases Report Outlining Community Reinvestment Act Recommendations
04/03/2018
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued recommendations to the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regarding the modernization of the Community Reinvestment Act. The report is a follow-up to Treasury’s 2017 report to the President entitled A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities: Banks and Credit Unions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Issue Final Rule Exempting Commercial Real Estate Transactions of $500,000 or Less from Appraisal Requirements
04/02/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a final rule that exempts commercial real estate transactions of $500,000 or less from the appraisal requirements promulgated under Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. The final rule raises the threshold from $250,000 to $500,000, for which appraisals are not required in connection with commercial real estate transactions. The agencies originally proposed to increase the threshold to $400,000, but they determined that an increase to $500,000 would not pose a threat to the safety and soundness of financial institutions, and would result in a material reduction in the compliance-related regulatory burden for financial institutions. For purposes of the final rule, “commercial real estate transaction” is defined as “a real estate-related financial transaction that is not secured by a single 1-to-4 family residential property.” The final rule clarifies that construction loans of $500,000 or less secured by a single 1-to-4 family residential property are not exempted from the appraisal requirement. In lieu of an appraisal, financial institutions are required to obtain an evaluation of the collateral that is sufficient to support the institution’s decision to engage in the transaction and consistent with safe and sound business practices. The final rule took effect on April 9, 2018.
View full text of final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig Discusses Finding the Correct Regulatory Balance
03/28/2018
Outgoing U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig discussed the importance of attaining meaningful regulatory relief without undermining the safety and soundness of the financial system. Citing a few historical examples, Vice Chairman Hoenig discussed the similarities among past crises, as well as the deregulatory attitude that has followed these crises once the economy begins to recover. Vice Chairman Hoenig noted that with a strong regulatory foundation, including strong capital and constraints on the reliance on government bail-outs, a number of costly administrative rules could be minimized or eliminated.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Consults on Guide to Internal Models
03/28/2018
The European Central Bank has begun a consultation on the first chapter of a proposed guide to internal models. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the ECB to assess and grant permission for banks directly supervised by the ECB to use internal models for credit risk, counterparty credit risk and market risk. The ECB's proposed guide aims to set out how the ECB intends to approach the assessment of whether a firm meets the necessary requirements for the permission to be granted.
The consultation covers only the first chapter of the proposed guide. This chapter is on general topics comprising overarching principles for internal models, implementation of the internal ratings-based approach, internal model governance, internal validation and audit, model use and change management as well as third-party involvement. The ECB intends to consult on model-specific chapters, including for credit, market and counterparty credit risks, at a later date.
The consultation closes on May 25, 2018.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley Discusses the Role of Incentives in Ensuring a Resilient and Robust Financial System
03/26/2018
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley spoke at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the role incentives play in ensuring a resilient and robust financial system. In his remarks, President Dudley noted the considerable progress that has been made since the financial crisis in creating a more robust and resilient financial system, including with respect to the safety and soundness of, and to the resolution process for, systemically important financial institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
U.S. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Provides Update on Examination Modernization Project
03/22/2018
The U.S. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council announced an update regarding its Examination Modernization Project. The project initially grew out of the regulatory review process undertaken pursuant to the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act, and is intended to identify potential improvements that can be made in the efficiency and efficacy of the community financial institutions safety and soundness examination processes. The project has focused primarily on leveraging improved technology to streamline and simplify the examination process for community financial institutions. As part of the project, the FFIEC has identified four key areas where the supervisory burden can potentially be reduced, including, better communication throughout the examination process, using technology to move examination tasks offsite, tailoring examinations based upon risk and improving electronic file transfer systems. While the FFIEC will first focus on these four areas, the Examination Modernization Project is envisioned as a long-term process, and the FFIEC will continue to identify new parts of the examination process that could benefit from further improvement. To facilitate improvements in the first key area regarding transparency, the U.S. federal financial regulatory agencies have committed to issue reinforcing and clarifying guidance to examination staff about the importance of being transparent and communicative throughout the examination process.
View full tex of FFIEC press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Updates Frequently Asked Questions on Basel III Standards
03/22/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published updated versions of its frequently asked questions on two aspects of the Basel III prudential framework.
The Basel Committee has updated the FAQ it published in August 2015 on the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures, providing answers to additional questions concerning collateral taken outside of netting sets, the treatment of Eurodollar futures, supervisory delta adjustments for negative interest rates, credit derivatives and effective notional calculations. The Basel Committee has also updated the FAQ it published in January 2017 on market risk capital requirements, with the addition of answers to three new questions on the standardized approach, the internal models approach and the trading book boundary and scope of application.
View the updated FAQ on the standardized approach for counterparty credit risk.
View the updated FAQ on market risk capital requirements.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Amending Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements
03/22/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation document on a technical amendment to the Pillar 3 disclosure requirements and the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions. The proposals are relevant in jurisdictions implementing an expected credit loss accounting model and for those adopting transitional arrangements for the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions. The Basel Committee is proposing to introduce a new requirement in the Pillar 3 standard to reflect any transitional effects for the impact of ECL accounting on regulatory capital.
The consultation closes on May 4, 2018.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Consults on Proposed Revisions to Minimum Capital Requirements for Market Risk
03/22/2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consultation on proposed revisions to the standard it published in January 2016 on the minimum capital requirements for market risk. The Basel Committee has been monitoring the implementation of the standard and its impact on banks' market risk capital requirements since the standard was published and has identified several issues.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Final Guidelines on Internal Governance Under the Capital Requirements Directive
03/21/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a compliance notification form on its website, seeking confirmation, by May 21, 2018, of compliance (or intention to comply) with the Final Guidelines on Internal Governance it published in September 2017.
The EBA was mandated under the Capital Requirements Directive to provide guidelines on the corporate governance arrangements, processes and mechanisms required under that Directive. CRD IV requires that institutions must have robust governance arrangements, which include a clear organizational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks they are or might be exposed to, adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administration and accounting procedures and remuneration policies and practices that are consistent with and promote sound and effective risk management. The EBA consulted in October 2016 on proposed updates to its previous guidelines on internal governance, which were published in September 2011.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Reports on the Credit Risk Mitigation Framework
03/21/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a report following its assessment of the credit risk mitigation framework under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Credit risk mitigation is defined in the CRR as a "technique used by an institution to reduce the credit risk associated with an exposure or exposures which that institution continues to hold". The incentive for institutions in using CRM techniques is that CRM can attract a reduction in capital requirements.
This CRM report forms the fourth and final phase of the EBA's roadmap for the implementation of the regulatory review of the internal models based approach. That roadmap, launched in February 2016, favoured continued use of the IRB approach (that is, the Foundation IRB Approach and the Advanced IRB Approach) and set out plans for the introduction, in four phases, of changes which aim at harmonizing definitions and supervisory practices in the definition of default, the estimation of risk parameters and treatment of defaulted assets, credit risk mitigation techniques and disclosure in four phases.
The EBA considers that increased clarity of the CRM framework is an integral part of the IRB review and the EBA has analyzed, in the CRM report, whether an overhaul of the CRM framework as presented in the CRR would be beneficial.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority and European Banking Authority Final Guidelines on Suitability of Management Body Members and Key Function Holders
03/21/2018
Following consultation in late 2017, the European Securities and Markets Authority and European Banking Authority have jointly published final Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of management bodies and key function holders in credit institutions, investment firms, financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies. These assessments are required under the Capital Requirements Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
Under the CRD and MiFID II, an assessment of the suitability of members of a management body should take into account factors such as sufficiency of time commitment, honesty, integrity and independence of mind of a member of the management body. The management body must have adequate collective knowledge, skills and experience among its members. Firms should devote adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of such members. Diversity is also to be taken into account when selecting members of the management body. In the case of key function holders, the Guidelines also specify requirements regarding the suitability of the heads of internal control functions and the chief financial officer of credit institutions and certain investment firms. The Guidelines apply to any other persons assessed as key function holders under the firm's risk-based approach. An Annex is provided as a template for firms to record the results of relevant assessments.
Read more. -
G20 Communiqué Calls for Recommendations for Regulation of Crypto-Assets
03/18/2018
The G20 has published a Communiqué following the meeting of Finance Ministers & Central Bank Governors in Buenos Aires on March 19 – 20, 2018.Among other things, the Communiqué states that the G20 welcomes the finalization of Basel III and remains committed to full, timely and consistent implementation and finalization of the reforms. The G20 looks forward to the outcome of the evaluation of the reforms to identify and address any unintended consequences, which is being led by the Financial Stability Board.
The G20 also commits to continue to address the decline in correspondent banking relationships. It welcomes the FSB's March 2018 progress report on correspondent banking and calls on the FSB to monitor, with the FATF, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group and the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion, the adoption of the recommendations in the FSB's March 2018 report "Stocktake of Remittance Service Providers' Access to Banking Services."
Read more. -
Bank of England Publishes Details of Its 2018 Stress Test
03/16/2018
The Bank of England has published a report entitled "Stress testing in the U.K. banking system: key elements of the 2018 stress test," providing details of the Annual Cyclical Scenario, which is the only stress test that the BoE will conduct in 2018. The report is accompanied by detailed guidance for participating banks and building societies.
The ACS will examine the impact on participant banks and building societies of three types of severe stress, which will be assumed to be synchronized. These are: (i) a U.K. and global macroeconomic stress; (ii) a traded risk stress (linked to a financial market scenario consistent with the macroeconomic scenario); and (iii) an independent misconduct costs stress. Seven banks and building societies will participate in the 2018 ACS. The report states that these participants account for around 80% of the outstanding stock of lending to the U.K. real economy by banks regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Implementing the Final Basel III Requirements
03/16/2018
The European Commission has opened an exploratory consultation on implementing the final aspects of Basel III into EU law, which will require changes to the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation. Basel III was finalized on December 7, 2017. The final package revises the standardized and Internal Ratings-Based approach for credit risk, the Credit Valuation Adjustment risk framework, the leverage ratio framework, including the introduction of a leverage buffer for Global Systemically Important Banks, the operational risk framework and the new output ratio floor. The revised standards are due to take effect from January 1, 2022 and will be phased in over five years. The European Commission is seeking feedback on the various elements of the Basel III package, including how the revisions will impact the EU banking sector and wider economy, how they compare to the current EU requirements and whether they pose any particular implementation challenges.
The Commission's consultation closes on April 12, 2018.
View the consultation paper and response form.
View the final Basel III package.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Confirms Its Approach to Supervising Non-Performing Loans Levels
03/15/2018
Following its consultation in late 2017, the European Central Bank has published the final Addendum to its Guidance for Eurozone banks on non-performing loans. The ECB published its final Guidance for banks on NPLs on March 20, 2017. The Addendum sets out the ECB’s supervisory expectations on the minimum levels of prudential provisions expected for new NPLs. It is intended to function as a starting point for dialogue between the ECB and individual institutions. As with the Guidance, the Addendum is not legally binding but would apply to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. An institution that does not comply with the ECB’s supervisory expectations, as set out in the Addendum, would be able to provide its rationale to the ECB as part of the dialogue. The supervisory expectations in the Addendum will be incorporated into the 2021 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. In the meantime, firms are expected to review their credit underwriting policies and begin provisioning for any loan classified as a NPL.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Passes Financial Institution Examination Reform Bill
03/15/2018
The U.S. House of Representative passed the Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act (H.R. 4545) by a vote of 283-133. The bill would amend the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 to require federal financial institution regulatory agencies to issue final examination reports within 60 days of the later of a financial institution’s exit report or the provision of additional information by a financial institution regarding its examination. The bill would also permit financial institutions to obtain an independent review of material supervisory determinations contained in a final report of examination, including the right to an Administrative Law hearing. The bill would also establish the Office of Independent Examination Review, which, among other things, would receive and investigate complaints from financial institutions with respect to examinations, examination practices and examination reports, review written examination procedures of federal financial regulatory agencies and conduct supervisory appeals.
View full text of the bill.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Adopts Revised Forms, Including Bank Merger Act Application Form
03/15/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revisions, certain forms, including the Interagency Notice of Change in Control (FR 2081a), Interagency Notice of Change in Director or Senior Executive Officer (FR 2081b), Interagency Biographical and Financial Report (FR 2081c) and the Interagency Bank Merger Act Application (FR 2070) forms. The revisions to the Interagency Bank Merger Act Application form include additional requested items, such as projected financial statements and capital figures as of the end of each of the first three years of operation following consummation of the merger. In doing so, the Federal Reserve Board noted that the form’s prior requirement of one year of projected financial statements was not viewed as sufficient. The Federal Reserve Board also explained that the additional requested items in the revised Bank Merger Act Application form are typically requested in follow-up questions in connection with the application, and that the changes will increase the efficiency with which Bank Merger Act applications are processed. The revisions to the Bank Merger Act Application form also include clarifications, the deletion of certain requested items, definition updates and minor editing changes. The notice highlights that the Federal Reserve Board worked with the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in drafting the revisions to these forms.
View full text of the Federal Reserve Board notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Advice on Measures to Address the Build-Up of Non-Performing Loans in the EU
03/14/2018
The European Banking Authority has published its advice to the European Commission on the use of statutory prudential backstops to prevent the building up of new non-performing loans. The Commission consulted in November 2017 on proposals for statutory prudential backstops to address insufficient provisioning for newly originated loans that turn into non-performing loans and requested the EBA to provide technical advice on its proposals by November 27, 2017. On March 14, 2018, the Commission published its legislative proposals to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation to require minimum loss coverage for non-performing exposures.
The EBA’s advice provides an overview of the Commission’s November 2017 proposal and discusses certain technical aspects, such as the interaction of the proposals with the introduction of IFRS 9 as well as the existing prudential framework. The EBA’s advice also provides a quantitative assessment of the proposal which, the EBA stresses, is a conservative impact analysis given the data available and time constraints under which the report was produced.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Launches Package to Address Non-Performing Loans Build-Up in the EU
03/14/2018
The European Commission has launched a package of legislative and non-legislative measures to address remaining and future non-performing loans in the EU. Since the 2007/8 financial crisis, there has been a build-up of NPLs in the EU, which impacts banks’ viability and lending capabilities. NPLs are loans where the borrower has difficulties in making scheduled payments to cover interest and/or capital reimbursements. A loan is classified as an NPL when it is either more than 90 days past due or the loan is assessed as unlikely to be repaid by the borrower.
The package comprises:- A proposed Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation to introduce a statutory prudential backstop, which will require banks to have minimum loan loss coverage for newly originated loans;
- A proposed new Directive on credit services, credit purchasers and the recovery of collateral which seeks to enable banks to deal more efficiently with NPLs by introducing an accelerated extrajudicial collateral enforcement mechanism and facilitating the outsourcing of servicing of loans to specialized credit servicers; and
- A Technical Blueprint for Member States to set up National Asset Management Companies where NPLs have become a significant issue in a particular Member State. It is intended for use in restructuring of banks in compliance with the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and State Aid rules.
Read more. -
US Senate Passes Financial Regulatory Reform Bill
03/14/2018
The U.S. Senate passed a significant financial services reform bill 67-31 on a bipartisan basis that would eliminate certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, including, most notably, increasing, from $50 billion to $250 billion, the threshold at which a large banking organization automatically becomes a systemically important financial institution that is subject to stricter supervisory standards. The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155) would also (i) exempt banks with less than $10 billion total consolidated assets from the Volcker Rule; (ii) exempt certain funds placed on deposit with certain central banks by a custodial bank from the calculation of the supplementary leverage ratio; (iii) reduce certain reporting and supervision requirements applicable to community banks; and (iv) ease certain securities law requirements. A number of the provisions of the bill track legislation that has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives over the past year, the most significant of which is the Financial Choice Act of 2017, which would amount to an omnibus revision of the Dodd-Frank Act. The House will now have to consider the Senate bill, and the differences between the two bills will likely be negotiated and resolved in a Conference Committee of the House and Senate.
View full text of the bill.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Amends Procedures for Hearings Conducted Under the Dodd-Frank Act
03/13/2018
The U.S. Financial Stability Oversight Council approved certain amendments to its procedures for hearings under Titles I and VIII of the Dodd-Frank Act. The amendments add Section 117 of the Dodd-Frank Act to the scope of its hearing procedures, and make other conforming technical and streamlining amendments. Section 117 of the Dodd-Frank Act (the so-called Hotel California provision) applies to certain bank holding companies and provides that in the event one of these entities ceases to be a bank holding company, it shall thereupon be treated as a nonbank financial company subject to supervision by the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Section 117 also provides that an entity designated as a nonbank financial company pursuant to this section may request a hearing before the FSOC to appeal this treatment. The amendments are effective immediately, but the FSOC will accept written comments received within 30 days of the publication of the amendments in the Federal Register.
View full text of the FSOC resolution.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Proposes EU Covered Bonds Legislative Package
03/12/2018
The European Commission has published legislative proposals for a new EU covered bonds framework. The legislative package consists of a proposed Directive on the issue of covered bonds and covered bond public supervision and a proposed Regulation to amend the prudential treatment of covered bonds under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The proposals are part of the EU's Capital Markets Union project and follow from the work of the European Banking Authority in this area, in particular, its 2016 recommendations for an EU covered bonds framework.
The proposed Covered Bonds Directive will apply to covered bonds issued by EU credit institutions, which means that only EU credit institutions will be able to issue covered bonds governed by the framework. Issuers using the EU covered bonds label will need to comply with the proposed Directive but can also use the label with national labels. Covered bonds are debt obligations issued by credit institutions and secured against a ring-fenced pool of assets to which bondholders have direct recourse as preferred creditors. The proposed Directive provides requirements for issuing covered bonds and the structural features of covered bonds, including dual recourse and bankruptcy remoteness. There are also provisions to address liquidity risk through the imposition of a liquidity buffer related to the cover pool and transparency provisions requiring information to be disclosed to covered bond investors. In addition, the proposed Directive provides for supervision at national level of covered bonds.
Read more. -
US Federal Reserve Board Provides Updated CCAR and DFAST Questions and Answers
03/09/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System published updates to its Comprehensive Capital and Analysis Review and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests questions and answers guide. The Federal Reserve Board provided additional questions and answers with respect to a number of topics, including general CCAR considerations, range of practice and supervisory expectations, FR Y 14-A report supporting documentation and the remediation of supervisory findings.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Seeks Feedback on Draft Guidelines on Managing Non-Performing Exposures
03/08/2018
The European Banking Authority has commenced a consultation on draft Guidelines on the management of non-performing and forborne exposures. The Capital Requirements Directive requires in-scope banks and investment firms to have robust governance arrangements and effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which the firm is exposed. The EBA is responsible for issuing related guidelines to further harmonize across the EU how firms implement these obligations.
Since the 2007/08 financial crisis, there has been a build-up of non-performing loans in the EU, which impacts banks’ viability and lending capabilities. In March 2017, the European Central Bank finalized its Guidance on managing NPLs, which applies to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. The EBA’s draft Guidelines similarly aim to reduce the build-up of non-performing exposures (NPEs) in a bank’s balance sheet.
The EBA’s proposed Guidelines set out sound risk management practices for banks for managing NPEs, forborne exposures (FBE) and foreclosed assets and apply to all exposures that fall within the definition of non-performing and forbearance in the ITS on Supervisory Reporting (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014). The finalized Guidelines will also apply to national regulators responsible for assessing firms’ risk management of NPEs and FBEs, as part of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. National regulators must also ensure that firms comply with the Guidelines on an individual, sub-consolidated and consolidated basis.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Passes Regulatory Reform Bills and Senate Continues Debate on Regulatory Reform Bill
03/06/2018
The U.S. House of Representatives passed four bills from the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, all by voice vote, which are primarily designed to reduce the regulatory burden on financial institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Proposes Amendments to Regulation J (Collection of Checks and Other Items by Federal Reserve Banks and Funds Transfers through Fedwire)
03/06/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System published a proposed rule for that would amend Regulation J (Collection of Checks and Other Items by Federal Reserve Banks and Funds Transfers through Fedwire). The proposed amendments are intended to better harmonize Regulation J with the Federal Reserve Board’s recent amendments to Regulation CC (Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks), and to reflect a transition from a paper-based check collection system to one that is essentially entirely electronic. The proposed amendments are designed to clarify and simplify provisions of Subpart A of Regulation J, while removing obsolete provisions, and to better reflect the rights of stakeholders, including with respect to the Federal Reserve Banks. The amendments also include proposed clarifications to Subpart B of Regulation J to reinforce that terms used in financial messaging standards do not confer legal status or responsibilities. Comments to the Federal Reserve Board’s proposal are due 60 days from its publication in the Federal Register.
View full text of the Federal Reserve Board proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Government Launches Independent Review Into the Prudential Supervision of the Co-operative Bank
03/06/2018
HM Treasury has directed the Prudential Regulation Authority to conduct an independent investigation into the prudential regulation of the Co-operative Bank plc during the period 2008 to 2013. HM Treasury is empowered to require the Financial Conduct Authority or PRA to undertake investigations where it considers that such an investigation is in the public interest and the relevant regulator has not launched an investigation on its own initiative. The investigation will consider the actions, policies and approach of the Financial Services Authority and one of the successors to its functions, the PRA, during their respective periods in charge of prudential supervision, including the withdrawal by the Co-operative Bank from the bidding process to purchase bank branches from Lloyds Banking Group (known as Project Verde).
Read more. -
US Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman for Supervision Discusses Regulatory Agenda for Foreign Banking Organizations
03/05/2018
Randal Quarles, U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Vice Chairman for Supervision, discussed the need to examine post-crisis reforms. Focusing on post-crisis regulations that impact foreign banking organizations operating in the U.S., he noted that regulations should be reviewed to ensure not only efficacy, but also efficiency and transparency.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Consults on Draft Guides to Assessing Adequacy of Internal Capital and Liquidity
03/02/2018
The European Central Bank has published two consultations on draft guides on the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP). The draft Guides, which will be relevant to institutions within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, are designed to assist institutions in strengthening their ICAAPs and ILAAPs and encourage the use of best practices by explaining in greater detail the ECB’s expectations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Votes to Pass Bill on Operational Risk Capital Requirements for Financial Institutions
02/27/2018
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 245-169 in favor of passing H.R. 4296. The bill prohibits federal financial regulators from establishing operational risk capital requirements for financial institutions unless the requirements are based upon, and appropriately sensitive to, the risks posed by the institution’s current business and operations. The requirements also must be forward-looking, rather than focused on historical losses of the financial institution, and provide for adjustment to capital requirements based upon the operational risk mitigating activities of the financial institution. The bill was originally part of the larger Financial CHOICE Act, which passed the House in June 2017. The bill was read in the U.S. Senate and referred to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Finance, & Urban Affairs.
View full text of the bill.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Systemic Risk Board Final Report and Opinion on Use of Structural Macroprudential Instruments in the EU
02/27/2018
Read more.
The European Systemic Risk Board has published a final report setting out proposed amendments to the ESRB Handbook on Operationalising Macroprudential Policy and policy proposals on the legal framework of the systemic risk buffer and the structural buffers for global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) and O-SIIs. Alongside the final report, the ESRB has also published an Opinion to the European Commission on structural macroprudential buffers.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Proposes Revisions to Pillar 3 Disclosure Framework
02/27/2018
The Pillar 3 framework was last updated in March 2017, following a Basel Committee review. The Basel Committee now proposes some revisions and additions to the Pillar 3 framework which result from the finalization of the Basel III framework in December 2017.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a Consultation on its proposals for the third phase of the Pillar 3 Framework. Pillar 3 comprises a set of quantitative and qualitative disclosure requirements applicable to banks in relation to capital, risk exposures and risk assessment processes, which are designed to allow other market participants to assess each bank’s capital adequacy.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Announces Technical Amendments to Stress Testing Regulation
02/23/2018
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule that makes certain technical amendments to its annual stress testing regulation. The stress testing regulation provides that the OCC may require an institution to include trading and counterparty components in its adverse and severely adverse scenarios if the institution has significant trading activities. Under the final rule, the date range of this position data has been expanded from between January 1 and March 1 of the current calendar year to between October 1 of the preceding calendar year and March 1 of the current calendar year. The final rule notes that this will provide the OCC with greater flexibility in establishing an appropriate as-of date and that the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has made a similar change to its corresponding regulations. The final rule also amends and clarifies the transition period for institutions that meet the $50 billion asset threshold, which subjects the institution to different stress testing requirements. Under the final rule, if an institution crosses the $50 billion threshold in the fourth quarter of a calendar year, it will not be subject to the supervisory stress testing requirement until the third calendar year after it crossed the threshold. Otherwise, institutions become subject to the over $50 billion stress testing requirements two calendar years after crossing the threshold. The final rule also makes definitional and other technical changes. The final rule will become effective 30 days from its publication in the Federal Register.
View full text of final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Final Policy on Pillar 2 Liquidity
02/23/2018
The PRA received a number of consultation responses. The Policy Statement sets out the PRA's feedback and explanation of a number of changes it has made to its original proposals.
The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement on Pillar 2 liquidity, following two consultations in May 2016 and July 2017. The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set additional Pillar 2 liquidity requirements. The Pillar 2 framework complements the Pillar 1 Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirements by capturing those liquidity risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under Pillar 1. In its May 2016 and July 2017 consultations, the PRA set out proposals for liquidity assessments, the introduction of a framework for cashflow mismatch risk (CFMR) and survival guidance on the granular liquidity coverage requirement stress within the CFMR framework.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Warns Firms to Improve Prudential Reporting
02/19/2018
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a new "Dear CEO" letter that it has sent to the Chief Executive Officers of certain firms for which it acts as prudential regulator.
The letter is addressed to the CEOs of "IFPRU Firms" (firms solo-regulated by the FCA that fall within the definition of "investment firm" in the Capital Requirements Directive and which are subject to the requirements of CRDIV) and "BIPRU Firms" (firms solo-regulated by the FCA that fall outside the definition of "investment firm" for CRD IV purposes). The FCA has observed that the prudential returns (in particular the Common Reporting (COREP) and Financial Reporting (FINREP) returns) submitted by these firms often contain inaccurate or incomplete data. The FCA stresses that, while errors or omissions can appear minor in isolation, they can materially distort data that are aggregated and used to analyse a sector or a group of firms.
Examples of the issues the FCA has observed include; failure to submit certain returns, such as the FINREP return; failure to complete underlying templates; inaccurate calculations; inconsistent submissions; reporting using incorrect units; and failure to report cumulatively where that is required.
The FCA instructs CEOs of IFPRU and BIPRU firms to review their firm’s regulatory reporting practices to ensure that they are fit for purpose, comply with the relevant reporting provisions and produce materially accurate data. The FCA plans to conduct a review of a sample of firms' returns as of October 1, 2018 and, should the same issues persist at that time, it will consider taking further steps to improve reporting standards.
View the Dear CEO letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Consults on Guidance on the Eligibility of Guarantees as Unfunded Credit Protection for Capital Requirement Purposes
02/16/2018
The Prudential Regulation Authority is consulting on its expectations regarding the eligibility of guarantees as unfunded credit protection for the purposes of a firm's Pillar 1 regulatory capital requirements. The PRA is intending to add a new section to the Supervisory Statement 'Credit risk mitigation'.
The EU Capital Requirements Regulation allows firms to recognize certain forms of credit risk mitigation when calculating their regulatory capital requirements. Unfunded credit protection can be attained through a guarantee where a third party becomes obliged to pay out in the event of non-payment or default of the credit obligor. The CRR sets out the eligibility criteria for a guarantee to qualify for CRM.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Final Rule Amending International Banking Regulations
02/14/2018
The FDIC adopted amendments to its international banking regulations that primarily impact the asset pledge requirements applicable to FDIC-insured branch offices of non-U.S. banks (of which there are only 10) as well as certain securities-related powers of foreign branch offices of state nonmember banks, which depend in part on whether the branch is transacting in investment grade securities. The amendments implement Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act, which generally requires the removal of reliance on credit ratings in banking (and other) regulations for determining the creditworthiness of a security or money market instrument. Under the amended regulation, an investment grade security is one “whose issuer has adequate capacity to meet all financial commitments under the security for the projected life of the exposure.”
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Approves Request to Establish Second Intermediate Holding Company
02/14/2018
The U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a letter permitting Deutsche Bank AG to establish a second U.S. intermediate holding company to hold its asset management business pursuant to Regulation YY.
View More.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reiterates Concerns over Commission’s Proposed Approach to EU Capital Requirements Regulatory Perimeter Issues
02/12/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a letter, dated February 9, 2018, from the EBA Chairperson, Andrea Enria, to Olivier Guersent, Director-General of DG-FISMA at the European Commission, relating to the regulatory perimeter of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The letter is in response to the January 22, 2018 letter to the EBA from the European Commission regarding the EBA's Opinion on regulatory perimeter issues under the EU capital requirements framework and the proposed changes under CRD V.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Delegated Regulation on Materiality Thresholds for Credit Obligations Past Due
02/06/2018
A Commission Delegated Regulation on Regulatory Technical Standards for the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Delegated Regulation supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation with regard to the conditions for use of the internal ratings-based approach. The CRR risk quantification provisions set out that a default occurs when an obligor is past due more than 90 days on any material credit obligation to a firm, its parent or any of its subsidiaries. The materiality of the credit obligation is to be assessed against a threshold set by the national regulator according to its view of a reasonable level of risk. The European Banking Authority was obliged to prepare draft RTS specifying the conditions for setting that threshold by a national regulator.
The Delegated Regulation sets out those conditions for retail exposures and for exposures other than retail exposures as well as providing for notification of materiality thresholds to the EBA, the updating of the thresholds and the applicable date for thresholds.
The Delegated Regulation applies from May 7, 2018.
View the Delegated Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Regulators Propose Amendments to Swap Margin Rule
02/05/2018
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the US Farm Credit Administration and the US Federal Housing Finance Agency issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comment regarding the minimum margin requirements for covered swap entities (the “Swap Margin Rule”). The proposed rule would amend swap margin requirements to ensure conformity with rules recently adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC, which impose restrictions on certain swap and other financial contracts that are deemed to be qualified financial contracts. The proposed rule would amend the definition of “Eligible Master Netting Agreement” to align with the revised definition of “Qualifying Master Netting Agreement” in the recent rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC, and would ensure that a netting agreement for a firm subject to the Swap Margin Rule is not excluded from the definition of “Eligible Master Netting Agreement” solely on the basis of the firm’s compliance with the recently promulgated qualified financial contract rules. The proposed rule would also provide that certain legacy agreements would not become subject to the Swap Margin Rule solely on the basis of their amendment to comply with the qualified financial contract rules recently promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC. Comments to the proposed rule are due no later than 60 days following publication in the Federal Register.
View interagency notice of proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Issues Cease-and-Desist Order Against Large US Financial Institution
02/02/2018
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a cease-and-desist order against a large US financial institution. The order requires the institution to utilize its resources to ensure compliance with consent orders issued by other US federal financial regulators. The order also requires the institution to submit written plans to its applicable Federal Reserve Bank that are designed to further enhance board-level oversight and governance of the institution and further improve the institution’s compliance and operational risk management program. These plans must be approved by the relevant Federal Reserve Bank and are subject to third-party review once implemented. In addition, the institution may not grow until the requirements of the cease-and-desist order are satisfied, absent specific Federal Reserve Board approval. Concurrently with the release of the cease-and-desist order, the Federal Reserve Board sent letters addressed to the institution’s board of directors, its former lead independent director, and its former Chair describing governance deficiencies identified by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board press release accompanying the publication of the order also noted upcoming changes in the composition of the institution’s board of directors.
View the Federal Reserve Board announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Regulators Release 2018 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Scenarios and Instructions
02/01/2018
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released the 2018 scenarios for the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST), and the Federal Reserve Board issued its instructions to the firms participating in the 2018 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Passes Five Bills Affecting Financial Institutions
01/30/2018
The US House of Representatives passed five bills focused on regulatory reform for financial institutions. The bills passed by the House include: the Housing Opportunities Made Easier Act (H.R. 2255), which amends the Truth in Lending Act to allow mortgage appraisal services to be donated to organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions;
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Testifies Before the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs
01/30/2018
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified before the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs at the committee’s Financial Stability Oversight Council annual report to Congress hearing. In his prepared statement, Secretary Mnuchin noted that the FSOC annual report recommended that member agencies review existing rules and regulations to reduce overlap and duplication, modernize regulations that have become outdated and tailor regulations to fit the size and complexity of the financial institutions for which the regulations are applicable. Secretary Mnuchin praised Congress for the bipartisan Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, a legislative proposal that seeks to ease the regulatory burden on smaller community-based financial institutions, and urged both the US Senate and the US House of Representatives to take quick action to reduce regulatory burdens. Secretary Mnuchin also stressed that cybersecurity is a key risk identified in the FSOC annual report. While Secretary Mnuchin stated that progress has been made with regard to cybersecurity, he highlighted the danger that a large-scale cybersecurity incident could significantly disrupt the financial system, especially given the ever-increasing reliance on technology.
View full text of Secretary Mnuchin’s statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Government Accountability Office Releases Report Regarding US Federal Financial Institution Regulator Compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act
01/30/2018
The US Government Accountability Office released a report that details the compliance of six US federal financial institution regulators (the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) with the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). Under the RFA, regulators must either consider a proposed rule or regulation’s impact on smaller financial institutions and consider potential alternatives, or certify that the proposed rule or regulation will not have a significant impact on a large percentage of small financial institutions. The GAO report identified a number of weaknesses with the agencies’ compliance with both aspects of the RFA, including a lack of transparency with respect to documentation supporting an agency’s regulatory flexibility analysis, and missing information in certifications. The GAO report makes 10 recommendations—each tailored to respond to perceived weaknesses at specific regulators—with each of the 6 reviewed agencies receiving at least 1 recommendation. The recommendations include enhancing transparency, developing policies and procedures that better document and explain the respective agency’s analysis, and requiring the agencies to review existing evaluation frameworks to ensure harmonization with the requirements of the RFA.
View full text of the GAO report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Issues Information Request Regarding Civil Investigative Demands
01/26/2018
The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comment regarding the agency’s Civil Investigative Demands (CID) processes. Further to statements issued by CFPB Acting Director Mick Mulvaney, the request for information provides an opportunity for the public to provide comments aimed at improving and streamlining the CID processes for consumers and financial institutions. The request for information asks for comment regarding a number of aspects of the CFPB’s CID processes, including suggestions for modifying or updating CID processes, proposed improvements to how information is conveyed to entities that receive CIDs and suggestions regarding the timing and deadlines under the existing CID framework. Comments are due by March 27, 2018.
View CFPB’s Information Request.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Issues Final Rule Regarding Prepaid Accounts
01/25/2018
The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau published a final rule that amends the regulations implementing the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (Regulation E), and the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z), and corresponding official interpretations. The final rule makes a number of modifications to these regulations, including changes to error resolution requirements and limited liability provisions, which will now apply after a consumer’s identity has been verified, designed to promote prompt registration of prepaid cards by individuals. In addition, the final rule clarifies how the prepaid rule applies to credit cards linked to digital wallets, which promotes consumer use of digital wallets, while providing the same protections that apply to traditional credit card accounts. The final rule also delays the effective date of these provisions until April 1, 2019.
View the CFPB’s final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Regulators Announce Favorable Community Reinvestment Act Consideration to Aid Areas Affected by Hurricane Maria
01/25/2018
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced that the agencies will give favorable consideration under the Community Reinvestment Act for bank activities that helped with revitalization and stabilization of the US Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico, which were designated as major disaster areas because of Hurricane Maria. The agencies announced that financial institutions located anywhere in the United States, including outside of the affected areas, will receive favorable CRA consideration for their community development activities concerning affected areas and individuals, provided that the institution has been responsive to the CRA needs of its own assessment area. The agencies clarified that favorable CRA consideration will be given to institutions that aid affected areas and individuals—including those who have been displaced and relocated outside of the affected areas—regardless of census information or the personal income of the individual being assisted. The agencies did, however, note that greater weight will be given to activities that assist areas and individuals that are of low and moderate income.
View the interagency statement regarding the announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Conduct Authority To Allow 90-Day Unbreakable Deposits For Client Money
01/22/2018
The UK Financial Conduct Authority has published a Policy Statement and final rules to introduce changes to its client money rules to amend the existing 30-Day Rule, under which firms are prevented from placing client money in bank accounts with unbreakable terms of longer than 30 days. The client money rules require firms to deposit client money in an account opened with an authorised bank, a central bank or in a qualifying money market fund. An unbreakable deposit is one where the firm placing the deposit has no contractual ability to request the return of the monies prior to the end of the agreed term.
The rule changes have been made following feedback from firms that banks have been increasingly reluctant to provide 30-day unbreakable deposits. This reluctance appears to have been due to the interaction of the client money and prudential regimes. All client money is subject to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio which requires banks to have highly liquid assets to cover 100% of their potential net cash outflows over 30 days. Unbreakable deposits of a maximum of 30 days are therefore capital inefficient for banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Quarles Speaks on Improving Effectiveness of Post-Crisis Regulation
01/19/2018
Vice Chairman of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Randal Quarles, delivered remarks at the American Bar Association Banking Law Committee’s annual meeting. In his remarks, Mr. Quarles discussed his approach as Vice Chair of Supervision and outlined a number of items that were areas of focus. Mr. Quarles noted that the post-crisis regulatory framework was largely complete—with the exception of the implementation of the Basel III framework—and noted that this provided an opportunity to reflect on these regulations and assess their utility and move towards efficient and transparent regulation. Mr. Quarles reiterated the need to reduce the regulatory burden for smaller financial institutions and echoed prior comments from Federal Reserve Board Chairman-nominee Jerome Powell that key regulatory areas that need improvement include resolution planning, stress testing and simplification of the Volcker Rule. Specifically, he noted that the relevant agencies have begun work on a proposal to streamline the Volcker Rule and “congeal around a thoughtful Volcker rule 2.0.” Mr. Quarles also discussed a few emerging areas for consideration, including (i) tailoring regulation to match an institution’s size, footprint, risk profile and business model, (ii) a re-evaluation of loss absorbency requirements, (iii) a recalibration of the leverage ratio and (iv) the Federal Reserve Board’s framework for control determinations under the Bank Holding Company Act, which he generally views as too opaque.
View full text of VC Quarles' speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
House Financial Services Committee Advances 15 Bills
01/18/2018
The US House Financial Services Committee announced that it had advanced 15 bills, many of which would alter the regulatory framework for financial institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Finalizes FR Y-7 Reporting and Clarifies Regulation YY Requirements
01/18/2018
The US Federal Reserve Board issued a notice finalizing its revisions to the Form FR Y-7 (Annual Report for Foreign Banking Organizations), regarding how a foreign banking organization should certify its compliance with US risk committee and home country capital stress testing requirements under Regulation YY.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Reports Steady Downward Trend in EU Banks' Non-performing Loans
01/18/2018
The European Commission has published a Communication to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Central Bank, setting out its first progress report on the implementation of the "Action Plan To Tackle Non-Performing Loans in Europe" that was adopted by the Council in July 2017. The Communication discusses addressing NPLs as part of risk reduction in the financial sector and reports that the general improvement in NPL ratios over recent years continued in 2017. The ratio of NPLs is at its lowest level since Q4 2014. The Communication concludes by stressing the importance of maintaining the pace of NPL reduction and the need, not only for continued action by individual banks and by Member States, but also for concerted action at EU level by the Commission and other EU institutions, including the ECB.
A Commission Staff Working Document, published jointly with the Communication, provides further detail on the workstreams identified as necessary to deliver the Action Plan and on developments in selected Member States.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Delays Implementation of Pillar 2 Reporting Requirements
01/17/2018
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has announced that it is postponing by six months the introduction of a new liquidity reporting template, PRA110. PRA110 is intended to capture information on cashflow mismatch risk within the Pillar 2 framework.
The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set additional Pillar 2 liquidity requirements. The Pillar 2 framework involves additional capital requirements set through regulatory discretion and complements the Pillar 1 Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirements, by capturing those liquidity risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under Pillar 1. The PRA consulted in July 2017 on a draft liquidity reporting template for CFMR, to be numbered PRA110. PRA110 will build on the European Banking Authority's maturity ladder reporting template, which will apply from March 2018, by including additional columns and rows to capture additional information. The PRA originally proposed that the PRA110 template would be implemented on January 1, 2019 and that, on implementation of PRA110, it would terminate the old FSA047 and FSA048 returns.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on Uniform Disclosure of IFRS 9 Transitional Arrangements
01/12/2018
The European Banking Authority has published a final Report and final Guidelines on uniform disclosures under the Capital Requirements Regulation regarding the transitional period for mitigating the impact of the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (known as IFRS 9) on own funds.
IFRS 9, which applies for accounting periods beginning January 1, 2018, will require the measurement of impairment loss allowances to be based on an expected credit loss accounting model rather than on an incurred loss accounting model. The application of IFRS 9 could lead to a sudden significant increase in expected credit loss provisions and consequently to a sudden decrease in an institution's Common Equity Tier 1 capital. For this reason, institutions that prefer not to recognize the full impact of IFRS 9 (or analogous ECL models) immediately have the option of phasing in implementation of IFRS 9 over a transitional period.
IFRS 9 is being implemented in the EU through a regulation amending the CRR which sets out transitional provisions. The amending Regulation applied directly across the EU from January 1, 2018. A firm that uses the transitional arrangements must publicly disclose its own funds, capital ratios and leverage ratios both with the application of the transitional arrangements and also on a "fully-loaded" basis, i.e., as if the transitional arrangements had not been applied.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Senate Banking Committee Holds Bank Secrecy Act Modernization Hearing
01/09/2018
The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs held a full committee hearing entitled “Combating Money Laundering and Other Forms of Illicit Finance: Opportunities to Reform and Strengthen BSA Enforcement.” Chairman Mike Crapo and ranking member Sherrod Brown each delivered opening statements at the hearing. Mr. Crapo highlighted the vital importance of robust anti-money laundering laws, rules and regulations, and their implementation through financial institution policies and procedures. Mr. Crapo also noted, however, that much has changed since the Bank Secrecy Act was enacted nearly 50 years ago, and stressed the need for its modernization. Mr. Brown also emphasized the importance of a robust AML regime, and noted that many large US and international financial institutions have been penalized for AML deficiencies. Mr. Brown noted that broadening information-sharing may make sense but that important questions about privacy protections must also be addressed.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Expectations on Disclosures of Expected Credit Loss Under IFRS 9
01/08/2018
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a "Dear CFO" letter that was sent to the Chief Finance Officers of larger UK-headquartered credit institutions. The "Dear CFO" letter sets out the PRA's expectations as to the minimum disclosures those firms should be making on transition to the new standard for loan loss provisioning based on "expected credit losses" that forms part of standard 9 of International Financial Reporting Standards. The ECL requirements will replace the old "incurred loss" provisioning model that was contained in standard 39 of the International Accounting Standards. ECL will require banks to provision for expected credit losses from the time a loan is originated, rather than awaiting "trigger events" signalling imminent losses. IFRS 9 has been implemented through Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2067, which requires credit institutions and investment firms that use IFRS to prepare their financial statements to apply IFRS 9 as of the starting date of their first financial year starting on or after 1 January 2018. The Regulation permits banks and investment firms that are required to use IFRS 9 to apply transitional provisions where the application of IFRS 9 leads to a significant increase in credit loss provisions and a decrease in the firm's Common Equity Tier 1 capital. Firms that use these transitional arrangements must publicly disclose their own funds, capital ratios and leverage ratios with and without the application of those arrangements.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Requests Comments Regarding Proposed Call Report Revisions
01/02/2018
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System requested comment regarding revisions to the FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9ES and FR Y-9CS call reports for holding companies. The notice requests comment with respect to, among other things, the utility of the reports, the accuracy of agency assumptions with regard to the burden imposed by the data collection activities, and means to enhance the quality of information collected or reduce the burden of the information collection activities. The proposed revisions include deletions or combination of certain sections of the reports, reducing the reporting frequency and increasing/adding reporting thresholds for certain data items. Comments to the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed revisions are due March 5, 2018.
View the Federal Reserve Board’s notice and request for comment.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
New EU Securitization Framework Published
12/28/2017
Two new EU Regulations introducing the new EU securitization framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union - the STS Regulation and a Regulation amending the existing Capital Requirements Regulation. The two Regulations implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's amended Securitization Framework for alternative regulatory capital treatment for simple, transparent and comparable securitizations in 2014 as part of Basel III.
The STS Regulation provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as STS securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. Originators and sponsors will be required to notify the European Securities and Markets Authority of any securitization that meets the STS criteria and ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website. The STS Regulation allows (but does not require) originators, sponsors and securitization special purpose entities to use third-party firms to assess whether a securitization meets the STS criteria, provided that those firms are authorized by the relevant national regulator.
Read more. -
EU Transitional Arrangements for IFRS and Large Exposures
12/27/2017
An EU Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards transitional measures for mitigating the impact of the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards (known as IFRS 9) has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. IFRS 9, which applies for accounting periods beginning January 1, 2018, will require the measurement of impairment loss allowances to be based on an expected credit loss accounting model rather than on an incurred loss accounting model. The amending Regulation allows banks and investment firms that are required to use IFRS 9 to apply transitional provisions where the application of IFRS 9 leads to a significant increase in credit loss provisions and a decrease in the firm's Common Equity Tier 1 capital. A firm that uses the transitional arrangements must publicly disclose their own funds, capital ratios and leverage ratios with and without the application of those arrangements.
The amending Regulation also provides for transitional arrangements for the exemption from the large exposure limit available for exposures to certain public sector debt of Member States denominated in the currency of that Member State. A transitional period of three years from January 1, 2018, will apply to these exposures incurred on or after December 12, 2017. Exposures incurred before that date will continue to be exempt from the large exposures requirements.
The amending Regulation applies directly across the EU from January 1, 2018.
View the CRR IFRS Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
OCC and FDIC Announce Examiner Guidance Regarding Mortgage Disclosure Act Data Collection
12/21/2017
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued statements providing guidance for examiners with respect to data collection by financial institutions pursuant to Regulation C, which implements the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. In the statements, both agencies noted the regulatory and compliance challenges financial institutions face due to amendments to Regulation C made by the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which took effect on January 1, 2018. To address these challenges, the agencies announced that they will not require resubmission of HMDA data collected in 2018 and reported in 2019 unless there are material errors. The OCC and FDIC further noted that they do not intend to assess any penalties with respect to errors in data that is collected in 2018 and reported in 2019.
View the OCC bulletin.
View the statement by the FDIC.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Changes to Shared National Credit Program Provides Regulatory Relief to 82 Financial Institutions
12/21/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced an increase in the aggregate loan commitment threshold for an institution to be included in the Shared National Credit program. The agencies noted that the increase from $20 million to $100 million reflects changes in average loan size and adjustments for inflation. In their joint release, the agencies noted that this change will bring regulatory relief to 82 financial institutions, while only nominally reducing the dollar amount of loans evaluated under the Shared National Credit program.
View the joint agency press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Update Community Reinvestment Act Thresholds for Small and Intermediate Small Institutions
12/21/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced technical amendments to the asset thresholds used to define small banks and saving associations and intermediate small banks and savings associations under the Community Reinvestment Act. These adjustments, which occur annually, are required under the CRA and based upon changes to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. Under the adjusted threshold, a “small institution” will be any institution that had assets of less than $1.252 billion as of December 31 of either of the last two years. The definition of “intermediate small institution” will be updated to include institutions with at least $313 million as of December 31 of each of the last two years, and assets of less than $1.252 billion as of December 31 of either of the last two years. The updated definitions will take effect as of January 1, 2018.
View the Interagency final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Proposes Technical Amendment to the Net Stable Funding Ratio
12/21/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a proposed technical amendment to the Net Stable Funding Ratio. Consultation on the proposed technical amendment will run for a short 45-day consultation period, under a new procedure adopted by the Basel Committee at its meeting in December 2017.
The proposed technical amendment relates to the treatment of extraordinary monetary policy operations in the NSFR. The amendment proposes to allow reduced required stable funding factors for central bank claims with maturity of more than six months.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Recommendations on Outsourcing by Financial Institutions to Cloud Service Providers
12/20/2017
The European Banking Authority has published its final report on Recommendations on outsourcing by financial institutions to cloud service providers. The EBA has developed the Recommendations on its own initiative as part of its broader work on FinTech, given the increasing importance and popularity of cloud services as an enabling technology used by financial institutions.
The Recommendations are designed to complement the guidelines on outsourcing issued by the EBA's predecessor, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors on December 14, 2006. The Recommendations further specify the CEBS guidelines in five key areas: the security of data and systems; the location of data and data processing; access and audit rights; chain outsourcing; and contingency plans and exit strategies.
The Recommendations are addressed to credit institutions, investment firms and national regulators and will apply from July 1, 2018.
View the EBA Final Report. -
European Banking Authority Publishes Full Impact Assessment of Basel III Reforms on EU Banks
12/20/2017
Following the summary it published on December 7, 2017, the European Banking Authority has issued its full cumulative impact assessment of the impact of the finalized "Basel III" prudential framework on EU banks.
The finalized Basel III framework, announced on December 7, 2017, includes further elements developed with the overall aim of addressing undue variability in the calculation of risk weighted assets and improving the comparability of banks' capital ratios.
Using December 2015 data, the EBA has conducted an analysis of the impact of the December 2017 revisions on the EU banking system. The EBA's impact assessment outlines, at a high level, the effect of the December 2017 revisions on: (i) minimum required capital; (ii) regulatory capital ratios, leverage ratios and capital shortfalls; and (iii) the extent to which banks are constrained by the different metrics of capital requirement in the revised framework, namely the output floor, the leverage ratio and risk weighted assets.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Consults on Revised Principles for Supervisory and Bank Stress Testing
12/20/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published proposals on a revised version of the stress testing principles it first published in 2009. The revisions to the principles are the outcome of a review of its current stress testing principles, carried out during 2017.
The proposed new principles have been stated at a higher level than the previous principles, so that the principles can apply across many banks and jurisdictions and so that they are robust to developments in stress testing practices. Overlaps between principles have also been removed, along with some of the descriptive wording accompanying each principle. While the application of the previous set of principles was split between banks and supervisors, it is intended that each of these new "streamlined" principles will apply to both supervisors and banks. Additional considerations for banks and supervisory authorities are set out within each principle.
Comments on all aspects of the proposed new principles are invited by March 23, 2018. Comments should be submitted using an online response form.
View the consultation paper.
View the online response form.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Proposals for an Amended Prudential Regime for Investment Firms
12/20/2017
The European Commission has published legislative proposals to amend the EU framework on the prudential supervision of investment firms. The proposals follow the European Banking Authority's Opinion on revising the regime published in September 2017. The aim of the proposals is to tailor the prudential requirements and supervisory arrangements to the risk profile and business models of investment firms.
The Commission's proposals maintain the EBA's recommendation for three different categories of investment firm.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Approves Bipartisan Bill to Modify Systemically Important Financial Institution Designation
12/19/2017
The US House of Representatives voted 288-130 in favor of the Systemic Risk Designation Improvement Act of 2017 (H.R. 3312). The bill, introduced on July 19, 2017 and sponsored by Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer, removes the $50 billion asset-threshold under the Dodd-Frank Act. In place of this automatic designation, certain Dodd-Frank provisions will now apply only to institutions designated as global systemically important bank holding companies and other bank holding companies that have been designated by the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System as warranting enhanced supervision and/or enhanced prudential standards.
View the full text of H.R. 3312.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Launches Three Consultations on Technical Standards under the Securitization Regulation
12/19/2017
The European Securities and Markets Authority has issued three consultations on technical standards under the new EU framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations. The new framework is made up of the STS Regulation and amendments to the existing Capital Requirements Regulation. The STS Regulation, which will come into effect in 2019, provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as STS securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure. The amended CRR sets out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
The STS Regulation requires originators and sponsors to notify ESMA when a securitization meets the STS criteria and ESMA will maintain a list of all such securitizations on its website. The STS Regulation allows (but does not require) originators, sponsors and SSPEs to use third-party firms to assess whether a securitization meets the STS criteria, provided that those firms are authorized by the relevant national regulator.
Read more. -
Federal Reserve Board Repeals Regulation C and Proposes Revisions to Regulation M
12/18/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced publication of a final rule repealing Regulation C. This regulation had been promulgated to implement provisions under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. However, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, all rulemaking authority under the HMDA was transferred to the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB implemented its own Regulation C in 2016, after publishing an interim final rule in 2011. The repeal of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation C is effective January 22, 2018. On the same day, the Federal Reserve Board also published a notice of proposed rulemaking and request for public comment regarding revisions to Regulation M, which implements the Consumer Leasing Act. Similar to Regulation C, most, but not all, of the Federal Reserve Board’s rulemaking authority under the CLA was transferred to the CFPB under Dodd-Frank. As such, the Federal Reserve Board’s proposal seeks to tailor Regulation M to reflect only the rulemaking authority under the CLA still vested with the Federal Reserve Board. Comments to the proposal are due March 5, 2018.
View FRB's final rule repealing Regulation C.
View notice of proposed rulemaking regarding Regulation M.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Amended Technical Standards for Benchmarking of Internal Models Under the Capital Requirements Directive
12/18/2017
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on proposals to amend the Implementing Technical Standards specifying the benchmarking portfolios, templates and definitions to be used as part of the annual benchmarking exercise by those institutions that use internal approaches for market and credit risk.
Feedback gathered by the EBA from institutions and national regulators suggest that changes to the ITS on benchmarking of internal models are needed to provide clearer instructions of reporting requirements, better data validation and more relevant portfolios for which benchmark values can be calculated. The changes proposed by the EBA relate to both market risk and credit risk. Minor changes are also proposed to the reporting templates and instructions, to keep the portfolios up to date and ensure the reported data is relevant for the 2019 assessment.
Comments on the proposals are invited by January 31, 2018. The EBA also plans to hold a public hearing to discuss the proposals on January 23, 2018.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Seeks Views on Implementation Issues Arising From Revisions to the Capital Requirements Regulation
12/18/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a discussion paper seeking early-stage feedback on potential implementation issues arising from proposed revisions to the Capital Requirements Regulation to incorporate new international standards for counterparty credit risk and market risk. These international standards, developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, comprise: (i) the SA-CCR framework, a new standardized approach for measuring exposure at default for counterparty credit risk, which will replace both current non-internal models approaches, namely the Current Exposure Method and the Standardised Method; and (ii) the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book framework, which makes a number of revisions and enhancements to the framework for market risk following the fundamental review of the trading book undertaken by the Basel Committee.
The CRR 2 proposal published by the European Commission in December 2016 is still being discussed by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament as part of the normal EU legislative procedure. However, the EBA has considered its draft mandates under those proposals and identified a number of issues that banks implementing the SA-CCR and/or the FRTB frameworks are likely to face, due to the need to introduce changes to infrastructures, IT systems, data management, pricing models or approximating techniques.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Finalizes Revisions to Components of CCAR and DFAST
12/15/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced the finalization of revisions to certain aspects of its Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) programs.. The Federal Reserve Board had originally requested public comment on modifications to the information collected as part of the FR Y–14A/Q/M reports applicable to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and US intermediate holding companies on June 9, 2017. As finalized, the “global market shock” component of CCAR will now include firms that (i) are not “large and noncomplex firms” under the Federal Reserve Board’s capital plan rule and (ii) that have aggregate trading assets and liabilities of $50 billion or more, or aggregate trading assets and liabilities equal to 10 percent or more of total consolidated assets. Notably, this would include certain US intermediate holding companies of foreign banking organizations. Firms that were not previously subject to the global market shock component will not be subject to the requirement until the 2019 CCAR/DFAST cycle. The revisions also result in an elimination or modification of certain schedules to the FR Y-14A/Q/M reports, including clarifying certain aspects of the reports. Under the initial request for comment, certain of these changes would take effect on September 31, 2017 or December 31, 2017, although the Federal Reserve Board’s final announcement extends the effective date for a number of these revisions to December 31, 2017 or March 31, 2018.
View FRB's notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Consults on Assessment Methodology Guide for Counterparty Credit Risk
12/15/2017
The European Central Bank is consulting on a draft ECB guide on the assessment methodology for the internal model method and the advanced CVA capital charge for counterparty credit risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. IMM and A-CVA are internal models used by banks to calculate counterparty credit risks for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and securities financing transactions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Technical Standards on Homogeneity of Underlying Exposures in Securitization
12/15/2017
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the homogeneity of underlying exposures in securitizations under the new EU framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations. The new framework is made up of the STS Regulation and amendments to the existing Capital Requirements Regulation. The STS Regulation, which will come into effect in 2018, provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as STS securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure for all financial services sectors. The amended CRR sets out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
The "simple" criterion provides, among other things, that the securitization must be backed by a pool of underlying exposures that are homogenous in terms of asset type and that the underlying exposures must include obligations that are contractually binding and enforceable, with full recourse to debtors and, where applicable, guarantors. The homogeneity requirement in the STS Regulation is designed to better enable investors to assess risk and conduct robust due diligence.
Read more. -
Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC Release Examiner Guidance for Institutions Affected by Major Disasters
12/15/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the US National Credit Union Administration released interagency examiner guidance regarding financial institutions affected by major disasters. In accordance with the guidance, examiners will continue to assign component and composite ratings for these affected financial institutions, taking into account how the disaster has affected certain of the ratings factors, such as capital adequacy and asset quality. The guidance also notes that examiners should evaluate management capability, but should distinguish between problems intrinsic to the management of the institution, and those problems caused by the major disaster. The guidance notes that a major disaster may result in a lower component or composite rating for an affected institution, but that formal or informal action that would typically be considered for lower-ranked institutions may not be required, taking into account the institution’s disaster recovery plan and policies, which should also be evaluated for reasonableness, among other factors. If action is required, the guidance instructs examiners to appropriately tailor the response to the specific circumstances affecting the institution.
View the interagency supervisory guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Technical Standards on Risk Retention for Securitization Transactions
12/15/2017
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk retention requirements for originators, sponsors and original lenders under the new EU securitization framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations. The new framework is made up of the STS Regulation and amendments to the existing Capital Requirements Regulation. The STS Regulation, which will come into effect in 2018, provides the criteria for identifying which securitizations will be designated as STS securitizations, a system to monitor the application of those criteria as well as common requirements on risk retention, due diligence and disclosure for all financial services sectors. The amended CRR sets out the regulatory treatment of exposures to securitizations that are deemed to be STS securitizations.
The STS Regulation requires, among other things, originators, sponsors or original lenders of a securitization to retain on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest in the securitization of at least 5 %. The draft RTS specify in greater detail the risk retention requirement, including the modalities of retaining risk, the measurement of the level of retention, the prohibition of hedging or selling the retained interest and the conditions for retention on a consolidated basis.
Read more. -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Releases its 2017 Annual Report
12/14/2017
The US Financial Stability Oversight Council published its 2017 annual report. The report addresses topics such as financial and regulatory developments and potential emerging threats and vulnerabilities, and makes a number of recommendations with respect to these topics. The report notes that market conditions have been relatively stable over the last year, and discusses the FSOC’s rescission of its designation of two nonbank financial institutions for supervision by the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System—American International Group, Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation, Inc. One key issue in the report is the continuing and growing threat that cybersecurity risks pose to the financial system. The report notes that although progress has been made in this area, more work is required to guard against significant cybersecurity events in the future. The report also discusses FinTech initiatives, both in the context of how innovation is changing financial market structure and financial products. The report notes that while these innovations can provide great benefits, they also create new risks to, and potential vulnerabilities in, the financial system.
View the FSOC report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Develops Templates for Non-Performing Loans
12/14/2017
The European Banking Authority has published standardized data templates for non-performing loans, following calls from the European Commission and the Council of the European Union to develop templates that would assist in developing the NPL secondary markets. The templates are not a supervisory reporting requirement, but a market standard to be used by banks on a voluntary basis.
View the EBA’s press release.
View the templates.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
House Financial Services Committee Advances 13 Bills, Including Bills Directed at Financial Institution Regulatory Reform
12/13/2017
The US House Financial Services Committee announced that it had approved 13 bills, several of which were focused on regulatory reform for financial institutions. Representative Jeb Hensarling noted in an accompanying press release that the Financial Services Committee remains committed to, among other things, reducing regulatory red tape that burdens and affects financial institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Standards on Disclosure Requirements for Encumbered and Unencumbered Assets
12/13/2017
A Commission Delegated Regulation setting out Regulatory Technical Standards for the disclosure of encumbered and unencumbered assets has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS supplement the Capital Requirements Regulation by setting out the requirements on firms to disclose balance sheet value per exposure class, broken down by asset quality and the total amount of unencumbered assets on the balance sheet. The final RTS set out the data required to be disclosed, the format and the timing of the disclosure. Additional disclosure requirements are set for larger banks.
The final RTS enter into force on January 2, 2018. The additional disclosure requirements for larger banks will apply from January 2, 2019.
View the final RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Issues Updates to its Pillar 2A Capital Framework
12/12/2017
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a policy statement setting out final amendments to its supervisory statements on "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" and its Statement of Policy "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital". These changes were proposed in a consultation by the PRA in July 2017, which closed in October 2017. Following feedback to the consultation, the PRA will proceed with the amendments it proposed in July, subject to some minor changes.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Confirms Approach to MREL and Capital Buffers
12/11/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published an updated Supervisory Statement, “The minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) - buffers and Threshold Conditions”. The MREL requirement is the EU implementation, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board.
The updated Supervisory Statement set out the PRA’s expectations on the relationship between the minimum requirement for MREL and both capital and leverage ratio buffers. It follows the PRA’s consultation earlier this year clarifying that it did not intend to create a different buffer requirement from that which is usable in the going-concern regime. The Supervisory Statement also discusses the implications that a breach of MREL would have for the PRA’s consideration of whether a firm is failing, or likely to fail, to satisfy the Threshold Conditions. The PRA has confirmed that it expects firms not to count Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital towards both MREL and the capital buffer requirements.
The Supervisory Statement applies to PRA-regulated banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms.
View the updated Supervisory Statement. -
Federal Reserve Board announces Three New Reference Rates for Overnight Repo Transactions
12/08/2017
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced final plans for the production of three new reference rates regarding overnight repurchase transactions of Treasury Securities. The rates will be produced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in consultation with the US Office of Financial Research. The three rates—Tri-Party General Collateral Rate, Broad General Collateral Rate, and Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)—are based on transaction-level data from segments of the repurchase market, and were the subject of an August 30, 2017 Federal Reserve Board request for public comment. The three interest rates will be constructed to reflect the cost of short-term secured borrowing in highly liquid and robust markets and each rate will be calculated as a volume-weighted median of transacted rates. The FRBNY intends to begin publishing these rates in the second quarter of 2018. The Federal Reserve Board also noted that although the Alternative Reference Rates Committee selected (in June 2017) SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. Dollar LIBOR, the details of the transition from U.S. Dollar LIBOR are outside the scope of the request for comment and this announcement.
View Federal Reserve Board press release and corresponding notice. -
Federal Reserve Board requests comment on package of proposals that would increase the transparency of its stress testing program
12/07/2017
The Federal Reserve Board announced a suite of proposals intended to increase the transparency of its stress testing program. One key aspect of the proposals is intended to increase transparency in the modeling used by the Federal Reserve Board to estimate hypothetical losses in its stress testing, including in the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Specifically, the Federal Reserve Board will make available certain information available to the public that has previously not been released: (i) a range of loss rates, estimated using the Federal Reserve Board's models, for loans held by CCAR firms; (ii) portfolios of hypothetical loans with loss rates estimated by the Federal Reserve Board's models; and (iii) more detailed descriptions of the Federal Reserve Board's models, such as certain equations and key variables that influence the results of those models. The Federal Reserve Board is also seeking comments on a proposed “Stress Testing Policy Statement” that would increase transparency around the development, implementation, and validation of models used by the Federal Reserve Board in its CCAR and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) processes. Finally, the Federal Reserve Board proposed modifications to its framework regarding annual hypothetical economic scenarios. Specifically, the proposal will clarify when the Federal Reserve Board may make changes to certain factors used in the framework, including changes to the unemployment rate and house price index.
Read More.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Extends Transitional Measures for Exposures to CCPs Again
12/07/2017
A Commission Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to CCPs set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Markets Infrastructure Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Thirty-two third country CCPs have been recognized by the European Securities and Markets Authority to date. However, there are still third country CCPs that are awaiting recognition status. Without an extension of the transitional periods, banks and investment firms in the EU (or which are subject to consolidated supervision in the EU) would need to increase their own funds requirements for their exposures to those CCPs that are not yet recognized. The Implementing Regulation extends the transitional period to June 15, 2018.
The proposals to amend the CRR include an amendment to these transitional provisions. The proposed amendment would remove the need for the European Commission to continuously extend the transitional period by basing the transitional deadline instead on the timing of an application for recognition by a third country CCP.
View the Implementing Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Discusses Regulatory Treatment of Sovereign Exposures
12/07/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a discussion paper on the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures. The discussion paper sets out the issues raised by the Task Force on Sovereign Exposures, which the Basel Committee set up in 2015, and presents potential ideas for addressing those issues. The Basel Committee's view is that all sovereign exposures entail risk but they also play an important role in the banking system, financial markets and broader economy. The suggestions presented in the discussion paper seek to balance the prudential risks with the Basel Committee's mandate to enhance financial stability.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Revised Technical Standards on the Mapping of External Credit Ratings
12/07/2017
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities has published a final report setting out revised draft Implementing Technical Standards for the assessment of credit quality under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Under the CRR, firms that use the Standardised Approach to credit risk (rather than the internal ratings based approaches or internal models) can use external credit assessments to determine the credit quality of exposures. Credit quality can be determined by reference to the credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions. The corresponding risk weight to which an exposure's credit quality should be mapped to establish the credit risk of that exposure is set out in an Implementing Regulation published in October 2016. ECAIs are defined as credit rating agencies registered or certified in accordance with the Credit Rating Agency Regulation or any central banks issuing ratings that are exempt from the application of the CRA Regulation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Assesses Impact of the New Basel III Framework on EU Banks
12/07/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a cumulative impact assessment setting out its analysis of the impact of the finalized "Basel III" prudential framework on EU banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel III Finally Finalized
12/07/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published the last part of the Basel III reforms. The revisions are to the standardized approach and the Internal Ratings-Based approach for credit risk, the Credit Valuation Adjustment risk framework, the leverage ratio framework, including the introduction of a leverage buffer for Global Systemically Important Banks, the operational risk framework and the new output ratio floor. The revised standards will take effect from January 1, 2022 and will be phased in over five years.
The revisions to the standardized approach to credit risk include, among other things, recalibrating the risk weights for rated exposures to banks, a specific risk weight for exposures to small and medium-sized enterprises, a standalone treatment of exposures to project finance, object finance and commodities finance, more risk-sensitive approaches for exposures for residential and commercial real estate, subordinated debt, equity exposures and unrated exposures to banks. There is also a new standalone treatment for covered bonds.
The IRB approach for credit risk has been amended by: (i) removing the option to use the advanced IRB approach for certain asset classes, including for exposures to large and mid-sized corporates, banks and other financial institutions and for exposures to equities; (ii) adopting "input" floors; and (iii) providing more specification of parameter estimation practices to reduce risk-weighted asset variability.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Support Conclusion of Reforms to International Capital Standards
12/07/2017
The Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced their joint support for the finalization by the Basel Committee of the “Basel III” agreement on bank capital standards, which were formulated initially in response to the financial crisis. The revised international standards will take effect in January 2022 and will be phased in over five years. The agencies announced that they will be considering how to best implement these standards in the United States, and that all proposed changes will be effected through the procedures of standard notice-and-comment rulemaking.
View FRB press release on joint-agency announcement.
View FDIC press release on joint-agency announcement.
View OCC press release on joint-agency announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Principles for Assessing Stress Test Model Risk Management Practices
12/06/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on model risk management principles for stress testing. The PRA is proposing a set of four principles which are intended to assist firms in developing and implementing policies and procedures to identify, manage and control the risks inherent in the use of stress test models. The principles will be set out in a new Supervisory Statement entitled "Model risk management principles for stress testing", a draft of which is provided in the annex to the consultation paper. The Supervisory Statement would present the PRA's expectations on the model risk management practices firms should adopt when using stress test models.
The four proposed principles are that:
1. Banks have an established definition of a model and maintain a model inventory.
2. Banks have implemented an effective governance framework, policies, procedures and controls to manage their model risk.
3. Banks have implemented a robust model development and implementation process, and ensure appropriate use of models.
4. Banks undertake appropriate model validation and independent review activities to ensure sound model performance and greater understanding of model uncertainties.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Proposes Update to Pillar 2 Reporting Requirements
12/06/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper proposing updates to the Pillar 2 reporting requirements. The PRA is proposing a new data item to capture stress testing data currently included in firms' Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process documents. The purpose is to enhance transparency and comparability in stress test data provided alongside ICAAP documents and to decrease the operational risks associated with capturing stress test data manually. The PRA is also proposing to reduce the frequency of reporting of the data items in the Reporting Pillar 2 part of the PRA Rulebook for some firms to take a more proportionate approach. In addition, the PRA proposes to consolidate the definition of several reporting parts of the PRA Rulebook into the Glossary.
The proposals are relevant to banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. The proposed changes would impact the PRA rules, the Supervisory Statement on Pillar 2 Reporting (SS32/15) and the Statement of Policy on the PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital.
The consultation closes on March 6, 2018. The PRA intends its final policy to take effect from October 1, 2018.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Roadmap for Completing the Economic and Monetary Union: Key Points for Financial Institutions
12/06/2017
The European Commission has published a Communication on further steps towards completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union. The Commission is proposing several initiatives. First, the Commission is proposing a regulation to establish a European Monetary Fund. The EMF would replace the existing European Stability Mechanism and would act as a backstop to the Single Resolution Fund. Any support that the EMF provided to the SRF would need to be fully repaid by the Single Resolution Board from its own resources, including contributions from the industry. There are also proposals on new budgetary instruments for a stable euro area within the EU framework, changes to the Common Provisions Regulation, proposals to strengthen the Structural Reform Support Programme and a proposal to establish a European Minister of Economy and Finance. The Communication is supplemented by a proposed roadmap for implementing these steps over the next 18 months. The proposed roadmap indicates the dates by which certain of the Commission's proposed financial services legislation would be finalized. The risk-reduction package (amendments to the Capital Requirements framework and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive) would be finalized by mid-2018 and the Capital Markets Union legislative initiatives, including the review of the European Supervisory Authorities and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, would be finalized by mid-2019.
View the Commission's Communication. -
Revisions to Supervisory Reporting Templates and Instructions Under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation Published
12/06/2017
A Commission Implementing Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which amends the Implementing Technical Standards, published in 2014, for the reporting by institutions on own funds and the provision of financial information.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Banking Committee Advances “Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act”
12/05/2017
The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs announced the advancement of S. 2155, the “Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act.” This legislation was supported by 16 of the Banking Committee’s 23 members, and is intended to ease regulation on credit unions and smaller banks. On the same day, Vice Chairman of the FDIC Thomas Hoenig released a statement in support of the legislation, noting its goal is supporting economic growth, while easing the regulatory burden on smaller, less risky, financial institutions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Office of Financial Research Releases 2017 Annual Report to Congress and 2017 Financial Stability Report
12/05/2017
The US OFR released its 2017 annual report to Congress and 2017 financial stability report. In connection with its release of these reports, the OFR notes that it has developed and implemented new vulnerability monitoring and stress index tools, which were used in preparing the OFR’s findings. The OFR reports outline 3 key threats to financial stability. First, the danger that cybersecurity threats pose not only to the financial industry, but also to the broader economy in general. The financial stability report notes that regulators are continuing to develop more robust cybersecurity standards, but that gaps still remain. The second threat discussed in the reports is the orderly resolution of a systemically important financial institution in the event of failure. The reports note that while the current framework makes orderly resolution more feasible, there are shortcomings in the framework with regard to nonbank financial institutions. The reports also highlight the important role that Orderly Liquidation Authority plays in resolution framework. Finally, the third key threat is the evolving structure of financial markets. Specifically the reports highlight the risks posed by lack of substitutes for essential services, such as settlement of US Treasury securities; market fragmentation, and replacing LIBOR with a new reference rate.
View OFR's 2017 Annual Report to Congress.
View OFR's 2017 FS Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Regulators May Re-evaluate Leveraged Lending Guidance
12/05/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation sent letters to Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer stating that they are considering seeking public input regarding improvements to the agencies’ Interagency Guidance on Leveraged Lending. Then Acting Comptroller of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency sent a similar letter to Representative Luetkemeyer in November. Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer had requested via letter that the agencies discontinue their enforcement of leveraged lending restrictions. The request by Rep. Luetkemeyer was predicated upon an October determination by the U.S. Government Accountability Office that the leverage lending guidance issued by the agencies fell under the Congressional Review Act. Because of this, the guidance may have no effect until it has been submitted to, and reviewed by, Congress.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Proposes to Amend Regulation A
12/04/2017
The Federal Reserve Board issued a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding amendments to Regulation A. The proposed amendments would revise the provisions with regard to the establishment of the primary credit rate at the discount window in a financial emergency. Under the proposal, the primary credit rate in a financial emergency will be the target federal funds rate, or, the top of the target range, if the Federal Open Market Committee has established a target range for the federal funds rate. The Federal Reserve Board also proposes to delete provisions that relate to the use of credit ratings for collateral for extensions of credit under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to reflect the expiration of this program. Comments on the proposal are due on January 8.
View notice of proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Announces Affirmation of Current Countercyclical Capital Buffer
12/01/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that it voted to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer at its current level of 0%. In coming to this decision, the Federal Reserve Board consulted with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and followed the framework established in the Federal Reserve Board’s corresponding policy statement. The countercyclical capital buffer is a tool that can increase financial system resiliency by providing financial institutions with a means to absorb higher losses in times of declining or fluctuating credit conditions.
View press release discussing the Federal Reserve Board’s determination.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Holds Nomination Hearing of Jerome Powell
11/28/2017
The US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs held the nomination hearing of Jerome Powell to serve as Chair of the Federal Reserve Board. Governor Powell’s written testimony briefly discussed his background and the Federal Reserve Board’s policy goals of maximum employment and price stability. Governor Powell acknowledged the Federal Reserve Board’s efforts to tailor regulation to a bank’s size and risk profile but stressed, however, that balance must be maintained between easing of regulatory burdens and preserving core regulatory reforms. Senator Sherrod Brown and Mike Crapo each expressed some degree of support for Governor Powell. Senator Crapo spoke briefly about the regulatory burden on the financial industry, especially with regard to smaller community institutions, and referenced bipartisan legislation that has been introduced to alleviate some of these burdens. Senator Brown, on the other hand, cautioned against deregulation, and expressed concerns about the direction of financial regulation under the current Administration.
View Governor Powell’s written testimony.
View Senator Brown’s opening statement.
View Senator Crapo’s opening statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley Discusses the Evolving Structure of the US Treasury Market
11/28/2017
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President and CEO William Dudley delivered remarks to attendees of the Evolving Structure of the US Treasury Market: Third Annual Conference. President Dudley’s remarks focused on the four priorities that were outlined in the Joint Staff Report on the Treasury flash event that occurred on October 15, 2014. These priorities include an increased need for collaboration between the public and private sectors with regard to Treasury market structure which will allow for a better understanding of the evolution of the Treasury market. The second priority discussed by President Dudley was increased data transparency regarding activities in the cash market which he argued will promote a robust and safe Treasury market, and allow for more timely response to issues that arise. A third, and related, priority raised by President Dudley is the market practices and risks associated with the Treasury market, noting that the opacity of the clearance and settlement practices can lead to information asymmetry and mispricing of risks. Finally, President Dudley discussed the importance of interagency monitoring of the Treasury market.
View transcript of President Dudley’s remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
First Deputy Comptroller of the Currency Keith Noreika Discusses “Whether Bank Holding Companies Are Obsolete”
11/28/2017
Keith Noreika, First Deputy Comptroller of the Currency discussed whether bank holding companies are obsolete, a topic he described as both timely and complex. Mr. Noreika, newly relieved of his post as Acting Comptroller, contended that the correct question to be asking is whether bank holding companies are a universally sound practice for all banks, noting that they may inherently be more valuable for large, complex, institutions, as compared to smaller, more traditional banks. He suggested that many of the reasons why bank holding companies were established initially are no longer as large of a concern given the evolution of state and federal laws and regulation. Moreover, he contended that while operating a bank holding company results in very high compliance and regulatory costs, in many instances, the powers granted to banks have expanded, while those granted to bank holding companies have narrowed. Mr. Noreika also noted that while bank holding companies may be a tool for reducing systemic risk, they are not the only tool that can accomplish this end and presented alternatives to the bank holding company construct such as merging the holding company into the bank.
View transcript of Mr. Noreika’s remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Stability Report Published
11/28/2017
The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England has published the latest UK Financial Stability Report. The FPC notes that the UK banking system is resilient and that UK banks are stronger than they were 10 years ago. The results of the stress test show that no bank needs to improve its capital position. However, as a result of the stress test, the FPC has decided to raise the UK countercyclical buffer rate from 0.5% to 1% from November 28, 2018. In addition, the Prudential Regulation Committee will set capital buffers for individual banks. The FPC will reconsider the countercyclical buffer rate during the first half of 2018.
The FPC continues to assess the risks posed by Brexit and concludes that Brexit presents a material risk to the provision of financial services to customers in both the UK and the EU. Three main risks are discussed: risks associated with bringing EU legislation into UK law through the Great Repeal Bill, risks to the continuity of outstanding cross-border contracts and risks presented by barriers to cross-border financial services provision.
The FPC considers that the extent and nature of the changes to be brought in through the Great Repeal Bill will depend on the terms of the UK's withdrawal agreement and there is a tight timeframe in which it all needs to be achieved. In addition to the Great Repeal Bill, secondary legislation is needed, and the regulators will need to change their rulebooks. Firms will also need to make changes to comply with the amended legal framework.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Repeals Guidelines on Retail Deposits Subject to Different Outflows for the Purpose of Liquidity Reporting
11/27/2017
The European Banking Authority has repealed these Guidelines, published in 2013, because they have been replaced by Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting of institutions, as amended in the 2016 ITS on supervisory reporting by firms of the liquidity coverage requirement, which became effective in September 2016.
View the EBA's announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Makes Derogation for Own Funds Requirements for Certain Covered Bonds Permanent
11/25/2017
A Commission Delegated Regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Under CRR, for banks investing in covered bonds that meet certain criteria, a preferential risk weight is applied. The amending Regulation makes permanent the derogation previously available to national regulators to waive the own funds requirement for certain covered bonds. The CRR sets a transitional date of December 31, 2017 for the waiver to be available.
The amending Regulation follows the European Banking Authority's recommendations on the EU covered bond framework published in 2014 and the European Commission's subsequent report on capital requirements for covered bonds published in 2015.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC Announce Final Rule Extending the 2017 Regulatory Capital Treatment for Certain Items Under the Regulatory Capital Rules
11/22/2017
The Federal Reserve Board, OCC, and the FDIC adopted a final rule, applicable to banking organizations that are not subject to the “advanced approaches” under the US regulatory capital rules. The final rule will extend the 2017 regulatory capital treatment for certain items, including mortgage servicing assets, certain deferred tax assets, certain significant and non-significant investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions, and certain minority interests. Under the final rule, banking organizations that are not subject to the “advanced approaches” capital rules will continue to evaluate these items in accordance with the risk weight and deduction treatment that was applicable in 2017. This extension does not apply to banking organizations that are subject to the “advanced approaches” capital rules, which will continue to be subject to the transition provisions for these items currently established under the regulatory capital rules. The agencies explicitly noted that the final rule was being issued to prevent different rules from taking effect while the agencies consider a broader simplification of the capital rules which the agencies announced that they intended to do as part of the recent review of regulations under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act. The final rule takes effect on January 1, 2018.
View the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
2017 Global Systemically Important Banks List Published
11/21/2017
The Financial Stability Board has published the 2017 list of Global Systemically Important Banks. The list was compiled using end-2016 data and the 2013 assessment methodology designed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The Basel Committee has proposed a revised assessment framework for G-SIBs but has not yet published the finalized version. The 2013 framework identifies G-SIBs by assessing their contribution to systemic risk and imposes higher capital requirements on G-SIBs to reduce the likelihood of their failure. Identified G-SIBs are placed into buckets based on their score of systemic importance. G-SIBs are also subject to Total Loss Absorbing Capacity requirements, higher resolvability requirements and higher supervisory expectations on risk management, risk data aggregation capabilities, risk governance and internal controls.
The G-SIB list comprises 30 banks. The 2017 list is largely the same as the 2016 list except that the Royal Bank of Canada has been added and Groupe BPCE has been removed.
View the list of G-SIBs.
View the Basel Committee 2013 assessment methodology.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC Announce Amendments to Community Reinvestment Act Regulations
11/20/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced changes to their respective regulations under the Community Reinvestment Act. The amendments consist of modifications to the definitions of “home mortgage loan,” and “consumer loan,” to conform to the related amendments made by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s as part of its implementation of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act in its Regulation C. The amendments make other conforming changes, including removal of reference to the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, and changes to the public file content requirements of these agencies. These amendments were the subject of a joint notice of proposed rulemaking, published on September 20, 2017, and the Agencies finalized them as proposed. The changes take effect on January 1, 2018.
View the interagency final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Finalizes Guidelines on the Application of the IRB Approach
11/20/2017
The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on the application of the Internal Ratings-Based approach, in particular, the estimation of risk parameters for non-defaulted exposures, namely of the probability of default (PD) and the loss given default (LGD), and on the treatment of defaulted assets. The Guidelines should be applied in conjunction with the requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the assessment methodology for national regulators regarding compliance by firms with the requirements to use the IRB Approach.
The Guidelines aim to address concerns raised over the lack of comparability of capital requirements determined under the IRB approach across firms which the EBA raised in its Opinion and Report on the implementation of the regulatory review of the IRB approach to calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, published in February 2016.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Extends Comment Periods for Two Supervisory Proposals
11/17/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced an extension of the comment period for two significant proposals that are currently out for comment. One proposal concerns guidance on supervisory expectations for boards of directors, and the other concerns a new large financial institution supervisory rating system. The comment period for both proposals had been previously extended through November 30, 2017, but will now remain open through February 15, 2018.
View Proposed Guidance on Supervisory Expectations for Boards of Directors.
View Proposed Large Financial Institution Rating System.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bipartisan Support for Financial Regulatory Relief Bill
11/16/2017
Mike Crapo, chairman of the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, introduced the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act which would introduce significant financial regulatory reform. Among other things, the bill, which received bipartisan support, would reduce the threshold at which a bank holding company is considered to be a “systemically important financial institution” from $50 billion to $250 billion. The bill also provides other relief for community banks, including setting a leverage ratio of tangible equity to average consolidated assets of between 8% and 10% for banks with less than $10 billion in assets. These same institutions would be exempt from the Volcker Rule. US Senator Sherrod Brown (ranking member of the US Senate Banking Committee) released a statement opposing the bill, cautioning generally against rolling back the protections of Dodd-Frank with little or no perceived benefit to working families. The full Senate Banking Committee is expected to mark up the bill after Thanksgiving.
View full text of the bill.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Regulations and Decisions on Systemically Important Payment Systems Published
11/16/2017
Two regulations and two decisions of the European Central Bank on systemically important payment systems have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will enter into force on December 6, 2017. These regulations and decisions have been made by the ECB in its capacity as supervisor under the Single Supervisory Mechanism for Eurozone banks, following the first comprehensive assessment of SIPS.
The two regulations amend: (i) the ECB Regulation on oversight requirements for SIPS, to make clarifications and amendments deemed necessary for the application of the highest oversight standards; and (ii) the ECB Regulation on the powers of the ECB to impose sanctions, to ensure that sanctions can be effectively imposed for oversight infringements.
The two decisions cover procedural aspects for the ECB to impose corrective measures for non-compliance with the ECB Regulation on oversight requirements and the methodology for calculating sanctions when the oversight requirements are infringed.
View Regulation Amending the Regulation on Oversight Requirements.
View Regulation Amending the Regulation on ECB Sanctions Powers.
View Decision on Procedural Aspects.
View Decision on Sanctions Calculation Methodology. -
House Financial Services Committee Advances 23 Bills, Including Many Directed at Regulatory Reform
11/15/2017
The US House Financial Services Committee announced that it had approved 23 bills, many of which are focused on financial regulatory reform. In a press release, US House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling noted that the bills are intended to provide greater capital market access to small business, and relief for community banks and credit units. The 23 bills include a proposed repeal of Title VIII of Dodd-Frank, which gives the Financial Stability Oversight Council the ability to designate payment and clearing organizations as financial market utilities and allows them to have access to the Federal Reserve discount window. Other bills included in the package would improve the living will submission process and stress testing process, including that a bank holding company would only be subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review process every two years.
View full text of the bills.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Regulators Discuss Lessons Learned Since the Financial Crisis
11/15/2017
Michael Held, Vice President and General Counsel of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discussed the many lessons learned from the financial crisis and cautioned against the dangers of forgetting these lessons. Mr. Held conceded that although post-crisis reforms and regulations should be reviewed, they should not be repealed at the cost of safety and soundness. Mr. Held discussed the improved resilience of the financial system, including praising the Orderly Liquidation Authority and other post-crisis improvements to the bankruptcy process, as improving cross-border resolution. Mr. Held stressed that financial institutions and regulators need to evolve as systems and risks evolve, in order to be adequately prepared for the next economic downturn.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports Good Compliance with its Guidelines for Identification of Other Systemically Important Institutions
11/15/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a report setting out the outcomes of its ongoing peer review exercise into whether its 2014 Guidelines specifying the criteria for the identification of Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SIIs) have been applied effectively. National regulators from the EU Member States and the supervisory authorities of the three countries of the European Economic Area participated in the peer review exercise. The EBA report concludes that the majority of national regulators are compliant, but notes deviations from the Guidelines in some jurisdictions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Issues Final Guidance on Identifying Connected Clients
11/14/2017
The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on connected clients under the Capital Requirements Regulation, following two earlier consultations. The Guidelines are intended to replace the "Guidelines on the implementation of the revised large exposures regime" issued in 2009 by the EBA's predecessor, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Measures to Address Non-Performing Loan Build-Up in the EU
11/10/2017
The European Commission has launched a consultation on proposals for statutory prudential backstops to address insufficient provisioning for newly originated loans that turn into non-performing loans. Since the 2007/08 financial crisis, there has been a build-up of NPLs in the EU, which impacts banks' viability and lending capabilities. The Commission is proposing to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation to introduce a requirement for all banks established in the EU to cover incurred and expected losses on newly originated loans that become non-performing. The requirements would be in the form of compulsory and time-bound prudential deductions of NPLs from own funds, and where that minimum coverage requirement is not met, a deduction of the difference between the level of the actual coverage and the minimum coverage from Common Equity Tier 1.
The European Commission has also asked the European Banking Authority to provide technical advice in relation to the Commission's consultation proposals. The advice must provide country-by-country estimates on additional/accelerated capital needs triggered for EU banks by the prudential backstops, taking into account, to the extent possible, expected increases in provisions as a result of the application of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 from January 2018. The advice must also assess the impact of certain design aspects too, including those that are relevant to the functioning, scope design and calibration of statutory prudential backstops. The Commission has requested the EBA to provide its report by November 27, 2017.
The Commission's consultation closes on November 30, 2017.
View the Consultation Paper.
View the consultation page.
View the Commission's request for advice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Prudential Consolidation Methods
11/09/2017
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on the draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the methods of prudential consolidation under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR provides that banks, investment firms, financial institutions and, when certain criteria apply, ancillary services undertakings, fall within the scope of the prudential consolidation framework. Banks and investment firms are required to fully consolidate all subsidiaries that are banks, investment firms and financial institutions. Different methods of consolidation, such as proportional consolidation, the equity method or the aggregation method, are allowed as an alternative to full consolidation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Opinion on Regulatory Perimeter Issues under the EU Capital Requirements Framework
11/09/2017
The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion and a Report on financial intermediaries and regulatory perimeter issues under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The Opinion and Report are a result of the EBA's up-to-date analysis of issues relating to non-bank financial intermediaries (referred to by the EBA as other financial intermediaries or OFIs) and the scope of EU-level and national prudential regulation. The Opinion and the Report provides the EBA's assessment of the use of the exemptions for certain entities from the CRDIV requirements, national approaches to prudential supervision of OFIs, the ambiguities around the definitions of "ancillary services undertaking" and "financial institution" in CRR and the need to update the list of activities that are part of the EU passporting regime.
The Opinion sets out the EBA's view on issues arising under the EU capital requirements framework that the European Commission, European Parliament and Council of the European Union should consider further in their current deliberations over the proposed amendments to the CRR and CRD.
Read more. -
European Central Bank Highlights Challenges for Smaller Eurozone Firms
11/08/2017
The European Central Bank has published a Report on the supervision of less significant institutions under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The SSM is made up of the ECB and national regulators of Eurozone member states, and is responsible for the prudential supervision of all banks in the euro area. The ECB directly supervises the larger firms, classified as significant institutions, and national regulators directly supervise the less significant institutions, subject to the oversight of the ECB. The ECB is also responsible for certain common procedures, such as the granting and withdrawal of authorization and the acquisition of qualifying holdings in SSM firms. The ECB can issue guidelines, regulations or general instructions to the SSM national regulators or even take over the direct supervision of a less significant institution (at its own initiative or at the request of the national regulator).
The ECB's Report discusses the main concerns for less significant institutions, which include competition, and suggests that less significant firms may choose to consolidate businesses to improve profitability. The Report also sets out the steps that the SSM supervisory functions have taken towards harmonizing supervisory approaches to level the playing field, and highlights that the key challenge that needs to be addressed is the use of different accounting systems because that hinders comparability of data between the firms. Finally, the ECB indicates that it is developing specific policy positions and operational guidance on issues relevant to Brexit and the likely relocation of some activities of UK firms moving into the Eurozone.
View the report. -
Acting US Comptroller of the Currency Discusses Removing the Separation Between Banking and Commerce
11/08/2017
Acting Comptroller of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Keith Noreika questioned the US regulatory requirement for banks to maintain a separation between banking and commerce. Noreika noted that the Glass-Steagall Act was enacted at a time when there were very few banks, distinguishing today’s economy where there are many more banks that are subject to a “robust regulatory regime.” He suggested that preventing commercial firms from engaging in banking activities has concentrated US banking operations in a few large banks. He reiterated a commonly expressed view that the financial crisis demonstrated that the separation of banking and commerce does not make the financial system inherently safer. Noreika also rebuked calls to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act, challenging the notion that the separation of commercial banking from investment banking in any way serves the best interest of the financial system and economy.
View Acting Comptroller Noreika’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
New Federal Reserve Governor Randal Quarles Calls for Fresh Look at Various Dodd-Frank Regulatory Requirements
11/07/2017
Randal Quarles made his first public address after being formally sworn in as the new Vice Chairman for Supervision of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at The Clearing House’s Annual Conference in New York. Although Quarles’s remarks have not yet been posted publicly, he notably called for taking a "fresh look" at various Dodd-Frank regulatory requirements, including stress testing, living wills and the leverage ratio. Although he generally did not discuss any specifics, he indicated his support for improving transparency, including seeking input for how to improve the Federal Reserve’s stress testing process. He also expressed support for tailoring regulation to reflect the risks associated with a bank’s activities and not just its size. Specifically, he noted that making adjustments to the $50 billion threshold for enhanced prudential supervision under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act are not dependent on Congressional action.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Finalizes Guidelines on Designating EU Branches as Significant-Plus Branches
11/01/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a final Report and final Guidelines on the supervision of significant branches. The Capital Requirements Directive and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive provide the EU legal framework for the prudential supervision of branches. The Guidelines set out how the consolidating supervisor, the home supervisor and the host supervisor should cooperate to supervise prudentially and assess recovery planning and coordinate monitoring of significant branches requiring intensified supervision. The Guidelines apply to 'significant-plus' branches of EU firms established in another EU member state, not to branches of third-country firms.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Launches Consultation on Package of Pillar 2 Measures
10/31/2017
The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on reviewing three Guidelines with the aim of strengthening the Pillar 2 framework. The consultation covers updates to the following:
1. Guidelines on common procedures and methodology for Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP Guidelines).
2. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities (IRRBB Guidelines).
3. Guidelines on institutions' stress testing.
The consultation on the three Guidelines is being run in parallel, with feedback on the proposals requested by January 31, 2018.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Issues Final Guidelines for Identifying and Managing Step-in Risk
10/25/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published final guidelines for the identification and management of step-in risk, following consultations in December 2015 and March 2017.
The Basel Committee refers to step-in risk as the risk that a bank may provide financial support to an entity that is under financial stress beyond or without any contractual obligations to do so, to protect itself from any adverse reputational risk that may result from its connection to the entity. The aim of the guidelines is to mitigate potential spillover effects from the shadow banking system to banks. The Basel Committee's work on developing the guidelines is part of the G20 initiative to strengthen the oversight and regulation of the shadow banking system to mitigate systemic risks, in particular risks arising due to banks' interactions with shadow banking entities.
Read more. -
Brexit: European Banking Authority Warns Against Letter-Box Entities
10/12/2017
The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion on issues relating to Brexit where a UK firm seeks to establish an entity within the EU27. The Opinion is addressed to the European Commission, national regulators of member states, the European Central Bank in its role as bank prudential supervisor for entities established in the eurozone and to national regulators in Norway, Lichtenstein and Iceland (as per the EEA Agreement). The Opinion is intended to provide guidance on supervisory expectations and to address regulatory and supervisory arbitrage issues that may arise as firms consider establishing entities within the EU27 before the date of the UK's exit from the EU. The Opinion covers areas such as the authorization process, equivalence access for investment services, internal model approvals, resolution and deposit scheme issues and internal governance and risk management. In particular, the Opinion addresses outsourcing and risk transfers using back-to-back or intragroup transactions. The EBA states that 'letter-box' or 'empty shell' entities do not meet the existing regulatory requirements and that national regulators should assess whether outsourcing is being used solely as a means of obtaining an EU passport. The EBA also considers that a group with a new EU27 entity that uses back-to-back or intragroup transactions to transfer risk must have enough capital, risk management and operational capabilities to absorb any material unhedged or unsecured portfolio in the event of the default of the group entity to which the risks have been transferred.
View the EBA's Opinion. -
European Commission Reports on Single Supervisory Mechanism
10/11/2017
The European Commission has published a report, addressed to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, on the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The Banking Union is made up of the SSM, the Single Resolution Mechanism and the deposit guarantee scheme. The SSM is the first pillar of the Banking Union, which the European Authorities are aiming to complete by the end of 2019. The SSM is made up of the European Central Bank and national regulators of Eurozone Member States, and implements the prudential policy and requirements of all banks in the euro area. The ECB directly supervises the larger firms, classified as significant institutions, and national regulators directly supervise the less significant institutions, subject to the oversight of the ECB.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Advocates Completion of the Banking Union by 2019
10/11/2017
The European Commission has published a Communication in which it calls for completion of the Banking Union by 2019 and provides a path on how that could be achieved. The Banking Union is made up of the Single Supervisory Mechanism, the Single Resolution Mechanism and the deposit guarantee scheme. The Communication is addressed to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Communication sets out the Commission's view on the steps needed to complete the Banking Union.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Allows Flexibility on NSFR Treatment of Derivative Liabilities
10/06/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has announced that it has agreed to allow jurisdictions discretion to lower the Net Stable Funding Ratio's treatment for derivatives liabilities. The discretion will allow jurisdictions to lower the required 20% stable funding factor for derivatives liabilities to a floor of 5%. The NSFR measures the assumed degree of stability of liabilities and the liquidity of assets over a one-year horizon. Implementation of the NSFR is expected to begin on January 1, 2018 and this agreement is intended to facilitate implementation. The Committee is considering whether any further revisions to the treatment of derivative liabilities are warranted and will carry out a public consultation on any further proposed changes.
View the announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Changes to its Large Exposures Framework
10/04/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposed changes and clarifications to requirements relating to intragroup transactions in the Large Exposures (LE) Part of the PRA Rulebook. The PRA is making the proposals following its review of its framework for the prudential treatment of financial groups.
The LE framework complements the capital framework by aiming to protect firms from large losses resulting from the sudden default of a single counterparty or a group of connected counterparties. The consultation proposals aim to simplify the overall intragroup LE framework, improve the consistency of the process of granting intragroup permissions and facilitate the orderly resolution of banking groups.
Under the LE framework, firms can apply to the PRA for intragroup permissions, under which exposures to certain group members (entities within a firm's core UK group (CUG)) are exempt from the LE limit and are also excluded from a firm's leverage ratio. The LE framework also permits a firm to apply to the PRA to increase its total exposures to certain cross-border group entities (known as non-core LE group (NCLEG) entities) from 25% to 100% of its own eligible capital.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on its Prudential Treatment of Banking Group Risks
10/04/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposals to amend the Groups policy framework it has in place for the application of prudential standards to firms on an individual and consolidated basis within banking groups. The consultation proposals are being put forward following a review by the PRA of its Groups policy framework to ensure that it remains coherent and fit for purpose in light of post-crisis financial reforms such as ring-fencing and the Basel III reforms.
The PRA proposes to amend relevant Statements of Policy and Supervisory Statements and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment part of the PRA rulebook to implement changes that will enable: (i) assessment and mitigation of the risks to group resilience due to the use of "double leverage" (which occurs when one or more parent entities in a group funds some of the capital in its subsidiaries by raising debt or lower forms of capital externally); (ii) assessment and mitigation of the risks highlighted by prudential requirements applied by local national regulators on overseas subsidiaries of UK consolidation groups; and (iii) improved monitoring of the distribution of financial resources across different group entities. The consultation paper also sets out some further policy proposals to refine the Groups policy framework.
Comments on the proposals are invited by January 4, 2018. The resulting policy will be implemented fully from January 1, 2019. The PRA also requests that, where practical and applicable, firms should aim to incorporate the consultation proposals in their 2018 ICAAP/Individual Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP) submissions ahead of full implementation.
View the PRA consultation paper on groups policy and double leverage (CP19/17).Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Proposes Prudential Backstops for Non-Performing Loans
10/04/2017
The European Central Bank has published for consultation an Addendum to its Guidance for banks on non-performing loans. The ECB published its final Guidance for banks on NPLs on March 20, 2017. The proposed Addendum sets out the ECB's proposal to supplement its Guidance with quantitative supervisory expectations concerning the minimum levels of prudential provisions expected for new NPLs. The ECB notes that the proposed measures should be regarded as prudential backstops which are intended to prevent the excessive future build-up of non-covered aged NPLs on banks' balance sheets. The ECB is proposing that banks would be expected to provide full coverage for the unsecured portion of new NPLs after two years at the latest and for the secured portion after seven years at the latest.
As with the Guidance, the proposed Addendum would be non-binding but would apply to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. If a bank did not comply with the Addendum, then it would need to explain its non-compliance. Any non-compliance could lead to supervisory action being taken. The ECB intends the Addendum to become applicable as soon as it is finalized and for the backstops to apply to new NPLs classified as non-performing from January 2018.
The consultation closes on December 8, 2017.
View the ECB's proposed Addendum.
View the ECB's Guidance on NPLs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Refinements to Pillar 2A Capital Framework
10/03/2017
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement setting out refinements to the Pillar 2A Capital Framework, under which the PRA sets capital requirements for risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The PRA consulted on the Pillar 2A refinements in a February 2017 consultation which closed on May 31, 2017. The PRA's proposals will be implemented largely as consulted on, save for minor amendments.
The PRA has made the following changes to the Reporting Pillar 2 Part of the PRA Rulebook:
· adjustments to the PRA’s Pillar 2A approach for firms using the standardised approach (SA) for credit risk;
· revisions to the PRA’s internal ratings-based (IRB) benchmark used for assessing credit risk; and
· additional considerations the PRA will make, as part of the SREP, for SA firms using International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) as their accounting framework.
The PRA has also made consequential changes to update:
· its Supervisory Statements "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" and "Pillar 2 reporting, including instructions for completing data items FSA071 to FSA082"; and
· its Statement of Policy "The PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital".
The revised Pillar 2A framework, which will affect banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, takes effect from January 1, 2018.
View the Policy Statement (PRA PS22/17).Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Policy Committee Proceed with Changes to UK Leverage Ratio for Treatment of Claims on Central Banks
10/03/2017
Following positive feedback to a combined consultation issued in June 2017, the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee and the Prudential Regulation Authority are proceeding with proposed changes to the UK leverage ratio framework. The aim of the proposals (summarized below) was to ensure that the leverage ratio framework does not act as a barrier to the effective implementation of any monetary policy action that leads to an increase in central bank reserves.
In the June 2017 consultation, the FPC consulted on a draft Recommendation to the PRA that the PRA amend its rules on the leverage ratio to: (i) allow firms to exclude from the calculation of the total exposure measure (which serves as the denominator for the leverage ratio) those assets constituting claims on central banks, where they are matched by deposits accepted by the firm that are denominated in the same currency and of identical or longer maturity; and (ii) require a minimum leverage ratio of 3.25%. Central bank claims include reserves held by a firm at a central bank, banknotes and coins constituting legal currency in the jurisdiction of the central bank, and assets representing debt claims on the central bank with a maturity of no longer than three months.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Launches Consultation on Setting Internal MREL in Groups
10/02/2017
The Bank of England has published a consultation paper setting out proposed changes to the Statement of Policy it issued in November 2016 on its approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). MREL is the requirement for firms to maintain a minimum amount of loss-absorbing resources to ensure that, should the firm fail, the resolution authority can use the firm's own financial resources to absorb losses and recapitalize the business so it can continue to provide critical functions without the need to rely upon public funds. The MREL requirement is the EU implementation, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board.
The BoE's 2016 Statement of Policy focused on "external" MREL, i.e. the calibration of the MREL of UK resolution entities. This consultation sets out the BoE's proposals on "internal" MREL, i.e. instruments that are issued to the resolution entity from other legal entities in a group. The consultation paper sets out the scope of internal MREL, how it should be calibrated, which instruments are eligible and the proposed transitional period for the application of the requirements. Internal MREL is intended to cover UK-headquartered banking groups as well as UK subsidiaries of overseas banking groups.
Read more. -
First Steps on Proposed Revisions to the EU Prudential Framework for Investment Firms
09/29/2017
The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion on the design of a new EU prudential framework for non-bank, non-systemically important investment firms. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate and for which a separate prudential regime should be established. The Commission issued a second CfA in June 2016 asking for: (i) advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them; and (ii) advice on the new prudential regime for investment firms that should not be subject to CRD IV. The EBA published an Opinion on point (i) on October 19, 2016 concluding that investment firms that have been identified, according to the current EU regulatory framework contained in the relevant technical standards and EBA Guidelines, as global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) or other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) should be subject to the full requirements of CRD IV although these criteria might need to be revised through technical standards to take into account the specificities of investment firms. This latest Opinion is in response to the second part of the Cfa and follows the EBA's November 2016 Discussion Paper on its proposals.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Final Supervisory Statement on Waiving Disclosure Requirements
09/27/2017
Following its consultation earlier this year, the Prudential Regulation Authority has published a final Supervisory Statement on compliance with the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on disclosure.
The EBA published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation on December 14, 2016. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulators Remind Firms of New Change in Control Guidelines
09/20/2017
The Financial Conduct Authority has published a statement reminding firms that the Guidelines of the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities on the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings will apply with effect from October 1, 2017. The Prudential Regulation Authority has provided a similar statement by way of notification on its website.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Significant Risk Transfer in Securitization
09/19/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a Discussion Paper on significant risk transfer in securitization, seeking views on proposals to strengthen the regulatory and supervisory framework of significant risk transfer. The EBA's proposals are based on the newly agreed European securitization framework, comprising the Securitization Regulation and amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation, which is due to come into effect in 2018. The Securitization Regulation includes new requirements on risk retention, due diligence, transparency and a new regime for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations (known as STS securitizations). STS securitizations will provide preferential regulatory capital treatment for investors, in particular, for bank investors through the related CRR amendments.
The EBA is proposing to strengthen the supervisory treatment of structural features used in securitizations that may impede the ability of originators to meet the SRT requirements on a continuous basis. The structural features are those that are not covered in the EBA's 2014 Guidelines on SRT for securitization - amortization structure, call options, excess spread and synthetic securitization. The EBA proposes a set of safeguards for each structural feature and a requirement that originators submit a risk transfer self-assessment to the national regulator when submitting their SRT notification.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on Assessment of ICT Risk Under the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)
09/11/2017
The European Banking Authority has published Guidelines for national regulators aimed at ensuring the convergence of supervisory practices in the assessment of the information and communication technology (ICT) risk under the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP).
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Finalizes Technical Standards on MREL Reporting by Resolution Authorities
09/05/2017
The European Banking Authority has published final draft Implementing Technical Standards setting out the common templates to be used and the procedures to be followed by resolution authorities when reporting to the EBA the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) that has been set for each financial institution in their jurisdiction. The MREL requirement is the EU equivalent, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board. The TLAC standard is the minimum amount of loss-absorbing capital an institution needs to hold so that bail-in tools can be deployed successfully on a resolution.
Read more. -
UK Financial Conduct Authority Consults on Allowing 31-90 Day Unbreakable Deposits for Holding Client Money
08/01/2017
The Financial Conduct Authority has launched a consultation on changes to its client money rules (CASS 7) to amend the existing 30-Day Rule under which firms are prevented from placing client money in bank accounts with unbreakable terms of longer than 30 days. The FCA introduced the 30-Day Rule in July 2014 to restrict the practice of some firms of depositing client money in unbreakable deposits for periods of up to years. The placing of client money in lengthy unbreakable terms attracts the risk of diminution if a firm is unable to withdraw that money in response to market events and the risk that client money may not be available for distribution in the case of a firm insolvency. Therefore, the FCA was (and remains) of the view that placing client money in unbreakable deposits for long periods is incompatible with the purpose of the client money regime. However, it is now proposing to allow the use of 31-90 day unbreakable deposits following feedback from firms about an increasing reluctance of banks to provide 30-day unbreakable deposits.
The reduced appetite from banks appears to have arisen due to the interaction between the 30-Day rule and the liquidity requirements of the prudential regime. All client money is subject to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio which requires banks to have highly liquid assets to cover 100% of their potential net cash outflows over 30 days. Unbreakable deposits of a maximum of 30 days are therefore capital inefficient.
Read more. -
Financial Conduct Authority Finalizes Amendments to Client Money Distribution Rules Following a Firm Failure
07/27/2017
The Financial Conduct Authority has published a Policy Statement and final rules following its January 2017 consultation on proposed changes to the client money distribution rules (CASS 7A) affecting the return of client assets following a firm's failure or other pooling events. The rule changes, which come into effect on July 26, 2017, are designed to speed up the distribution of client assets, improve consumer outcomes and reduce the market impact of an investment firm failure. Following consultation feedback, the FCA is introducing the majority of the proposed changes in the form consulted on. However, minor changes have been made to the proposals on post-transfer client notifications (a 14-day deadline will be introduced rather than the 7-day deadline originally proposed) and on the proposed guidance on reconciliations that follow a primary pooling event. The FCA also provided new guidance concerning the need for firms to designate as client transaction accounts those accounts which the CCP makes available as customer accounts for such purposes. The FCA will not be proceeding with its original proposal to require firms to provide annotated samples of their client statements.
View the FCA Policy Statement (PS 17/18). -
Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Relationship Between MREL and Buffer Requirements
07/27/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on an update to its November 2016 Supervisory Statement, "The minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) - buffers and Threshold Conditions". The Supervisory Statement (SS 16/16) set out the PRA';s expectations on the relationship between the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and both capital and leverage ratio buffers, as well as the implications that a breach of MREL would have for the PRA's consideration of whether a firm is failing, or likely to fail, to satisfy the Threshold Conditions. The Supervisory Statement states that the PRA expects firms not to count Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital towards both MREL and the buffer requirements.
Since its publication of the Supervisory Statement in November 2016, the PRA has been asked about the approach to be taken in the situation where MREL is calibrated on the basis of one capital regime (e.g. leverage, in circumstances where the leverage requirement is larger than the risk-weighted requirement), but the largest requirement for buffers derives from the other regime (e.g. risk-weighted capital). The PRA is consulting on revisions to SS 16/16 to clarify that the expectations set in SS16/16 are not intended to create a different buffer requirement from that which is usable in the going-concern regime.
The PRA invites responses to the consultation by September 29, 2017. The PRA aims to publish a revised supervisory statement by the end of 2017.
View the PRA's consultation paper. -
European Banking Authority Issues Final Draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Applications for Authorization of Credit Institutions
07/14/2017
The European Banking Authority has published its final draft Regulatory Technical Standards setting out a comprehensive list of the information that must be provided to national regulators by firms applying for authorization as a credit institution under the Capital Requirements Directive. The final draft RTS are accompanied by final draft Implementing Technical Standards which set out the various procedures and requirements for making applications, along with a template to be used and guidance on how national regulators should deal with incomplete applications. The next step is for the European Commission to consider the draft RTS and ITS with a view to making a decision whether to endorse them via delegated legislation. In an accompanying press release, the EBA urges the Commission to consider adopting the RTS and ITS at the earliest opportunity to enable processing of applications from entities seeking to relocate to continental Europe in the context of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union.
View the EBA Final Report.
View the Press Release. -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Second Consultation on Pillar 2 Liquidity
07/13/2017
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation setting out its proposals on a cashflow mismatch risk (CFMR) framework and other methodologies it will use to assess firms' liquidity risk under the Pillar 2 liquidity framework. CFMR is the risk that a firm has insufficient liquidity from liquid assets and other liquidity inflows to cover liquidity outflows on a daily basis.
The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set additional Pillar 2 liquidity requirements. The Pillar 2 framework complements the Pillar 1 Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirements by capturing those liquidity risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under Pillar 1. The PRA has previously set out, in a consultation in May 2016, a non-exhaustive list of Pillar 2 risks. This consultation builds on the proposals in, and feedback received on, the May 2016 consultation and proposes updates to the Supervisory Statements "The PRA's approach to supervising liquidity and funding risks" and "Guidelines for completing regulatory returns".
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Proposes Adjustments to Pillar 2A Capital Framework
07/12/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority is consulting on proposals to change its Supervisory Statement "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" and its Statement of Policy "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital". The PRA's proposals are intended to bring greater clarity, consistency and transparency to the PRA's capital-setting approach and to promote a greater level of transparency and disclosure.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Waiving Disclosure Requirements
06/21/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on compliance with the European Banking Authority's guidelines on disclosure of the composition of collateral for exposures to counterparty credit risk.
The EBA published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation on December 14, 2016. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Extends Transitional Measures for Exposures to CCPs
06/07/2017
A Commission Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to central counterparties set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Markets Infrastructure Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
The European Banking Authority Consults on the Use of Cloud Service Providers by Financial Institutions
05/18/2017
The European Banking Authority has published for consultation draft Recommendations on outsourcings by financial institutions to cloud service providers.
The EBA has identified the need for specific guidance for outsourcing to cloud service providers to address uncertainty regarding supervisory expectations in this area. The draft Recommendations build on the existing outsourcing guidelines by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors, published in 2006, which the EBA intends to update in due course.
The draft Recommendations address five key areas: the security of data and systems, location of data and data processing, access and audit rights, chain outsourcing, and contingency plans and exit strategies. The draft Recommendations would apply to banks and investment firms subject to the Capital Requirements Directive as well as and national regulators. The EBA will consider whether to extend the applicability of the draft Recommendations to other regulated firms.
The consultation closes on August 18, 2017.
View the Recommendations.
View the CEBS Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Finalizes Guide on Fitness and Propriety Assessments
05/15/2017
The European Central Bank has published a final Guide on fitness and propriety assessments for the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders in significant banks. The final Guide differs from the consultation version published in January, with several clarifications being made, including a requirement that fit and proper assessments are confidential. The ECB Guide is based on six Principles, namely: the primary responsibility of banks in carrying out due diligence and assessments, the role of the ECB as a "gatekeeper", the harmonization of assessments across the euro area, proportionality and case-by-case assessment, due process and fairness, and interaction with ongoing supervision. The Guide sets out the five assessment criteria against which the fitness and propriety of members of the management body is assessed: experience, reputation, conflicts of interest and independence of mind, time commitment and collective suitability. The Guide provides information on the purpose, scope and type of interviews conducted by the ECB of appointees. The Guide highlights how a decision is taken by the ECB after every fit and proper assessment and the various types of decisions that may be taken. The Guide also notes that under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation, the ECB has the power to remove, at any time, members from the management body of a significant supervised entity who do not fulfill the fit and proper requirements.
View the ECB Guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Guidelines for Implementation of an Expected Credit Loss Accounting Model by Banks
05/12/2017
The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on banks' credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses. These final Guidelines are a result of a consultation that ended on October 26, 2016, and build on the related Guidance by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, published in December 2015. The Guidelines will apply at the start of the first accounting period beginning on or after January 1, 2018.
Many banks in the EU apply the International Financial Reporting Standards. IFRS 9, which will apply for accounting periods beginning January 1, 2018, will require the measurement of impairment loss allowances to be based on an expected credit loss accounting model rather than on an incurred loss accounting model. The use of an ECL accounting model involves some discretion in its application. The Guidelines set out supervisory expectations for credit institutions related to sound credit risk practices associated with implementing and applying an ECL accounting model.
These Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the provisions of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive IV as well as the relevant technical standards.
View the final Guidelines.
View the Consultation Paper.
View the Basel Committee Guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Guidelines to Assess Information and Communication Technology Risk
05/11/2017
The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on the assessment of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risk in the context of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). These final Guidelines are a result of a consultation that ended on January 6, 2017. The Guidelines will apply to national EU regulators and aim to promote common procedures and methodologies for their assessment of ICT risk. The Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2018.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Holds Meeting on Efficacy of Volcker Rule
05/08/2017
On May 8, 2017, the US Financial Stability Oversight Council issued a readout of its meeting in which FSOC discussed efforts to assess the efficacy of the Volcker Rule. Reportedly, at the closed-door meeting, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin directed the various agencies with oversight over the Volcker Rule to re-examine the scope of permissible activities under the rule.
View text of the FSOC readout.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Governor Gives Speech Assessing Post-Crisis Regulatory Framework
04/20/2017
US Federal Reserve Board Governor Jerome Powell gave a speech at the Global Finance Forum assessing the “core reforms” of the post-crisis financial regulatory framework. Although Governor Powell generally defended such reforms, he acknowledged that some aspects of the framework could be better tailored and less burdensome, in particular with respect to regulations that have been applied to small and medium-sized institutions. In addition, Governor Powell acknowledged that the post-crisis framework was, in many cases, excessively complex, and called for, among other things, a reassessment of the Federal Reserve’s supervisory expectations of the boards of directors of banking firms.
View text of the speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Announces One-on-One Industry Meetings as Part of Office of Innovation Office Hours
04/13/2017
The US OCC announced that its Office of Innovation will host two days of office hours for national banks, federal savings associations (FSAs) and fintech companies to discuss the OCC’s perspective on responsible innovation. This initial round of meetings will be held in the OCC’s San Francisco Field Office on May 16 and 17, 2017. The OCC anticipates holding office hours in other designated cities at a later date.
The OCC’s Acting Chief Innovation Officer Beth Knickerbocker noted that the office hours are an opportunity for attendees to have candid discussions with OCC staff regarding financial technology, new products or services, partnering with a bank or fintech company or other matters related to financial innovation. OCC staff will provide feedback and respond to questions during the one-hour meetings. The OCC expects to meet with up to fifteen companies over the two-day period.
View more information regarding the meetings.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
FDIC Vice Chairman Delivers Remarks Regarding the Global Capital Index
04/13/2017
US FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig delivered remarks regarding the semi-annual report of the Global Capital Index released that day.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Harmonizes Regulatory Discretions for "Less Significant" Institutions
04/13/2017
The European Central Bank has published a Guideline and Recommendation to harmonize the way in which Euro member state national regulators of "less significant" banks exercise discretions available to them under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. This follows a public consultation on the draft Guideline and Recommendation, which was launched on November 3, 2016 and ended on January 5, 2017. The ECB has already harmonized the application of options and discretions for the banks that it directly prudentially supervises under the Single Supervisory Mechanism.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft Revisions to EU Supervisory Reporting Requirements for Sovereign Exposures and Operational Risk Published
04/07/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a final report and final draft Implementing Technical Standards amending the existing ITS on supervisory reporting. The ITS on supervisory reporting collate the prudential reporting requirements of banks under the Capital Requirements Regulation, related technical standards and other financial information required by national regulators. The ITS on supervisory reporting are updated when prudential or supervisory requirements change. The EBA consulted on the amending ITS at the end of 2016.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Departing Federal Reserve Governor Tarullo Gives Speech Supporting Strong Capital Requirements and Criticizing the Volcker Rule
04/05/2017
Daniel Tarullo’s resignation from the US Federal Reserve Board became effective, and he was succeeded by Governor Powell as the Chairman of the Board of Governors’ Committee on Supervision and Regulation. In a speech given on April 4, 2017, Mr. Tarullo reviewed the Federal Reserve’s development of the capital regulation and stress testing regime in the period since the financial crisis, and expressed support for strong capital requirements and strict supervisory stress testing, as well as for raising the $50 billion asset threshold as the trigger for application of enhanced prudential standards under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, stating that “the time may be coming when the qualitative objection in CCAR should be phased out." In contrast, Mr. Tarullo criticized the Volcker Rule, citing it as an area where “the case for change has become fairly strong."
View full text of the speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Consults on Updating the Guidelines on the Credit Rating Agency Endorsement Regime
04/04/2017
The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a consultation paper on updating the Guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation. Endorsement is a regime that allows credit ratings issued by a third-country CRA and endorsed by an EU CRA to be used for regulatory purposes in the EU. The consultation paper proposes two main changes to the existing Guidelines. First, where a third-country legal and supervisory framework has been positively assessed by ESMA, ESMA will no longer assume that compliance of the third-country CRA with this framework equates to compliance with requirements as stringent as those under the CRA Regulation. The endorsing CRA is expected to verify and be able to demonstrate that the third-country CRA has established internal requirements which are at least as stringent as the corresponding requirements in the relevant provisions of the CRA Regulation. Secondly, the consultation paper clarifies that ESMA has the power to request information directly from the endorsing CRA about the conduct of the third-country CRA. The consultation closes on July 3, 2017.
View the consultation paper. -
Revised Assessment Framework for G-SIBs Proposed
03/30/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has launched a consultation proposing a revised assessment framework for global systemically important banks. The framework, first published in July 2013, identifies G-SIBs by assessing their contribution to systemic risk and imposes higher capital requirements on G-SIBs to reduce the likelihood of their failure. Identified G-SIBs are placed into buckets based on their score of systemic importance. G-SIBs are also subject to Total Loss Absorbing Capacity requirements and higher supervisory expectations on risk management, risk data aggregation capabilities, risk governance and internal controls. The Basel Committee is proposing to amend the framework by, among other things, removing the cap on the substitutability category, expanding the scope of consolidation to include insurance subsidiaries for three categories, amending the definition of cross-jurisdictional activity, revising disclosure requirements and including further guidance on bucket migration. In addition, the Basel Committee is also asking for feedback on the introduction of a new indicator for short-term wholesale funding.
Responses to the proposals are requested by June 30, 2017. The Basel Committee is proposing a transitional schedule for implementing any revised assessment framework so that any changes announced in November 2017 would take effect in 2019 and the resulting higher loss absorbency requirement would apply from January 2021.
View the consultation paper.
View the existing G-SIB assessment framework.
View the current list of G-SIBs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Passes Bankruptcy Reform Bill That Would Amend Title II
03/29/2017
The Judiciary Committee of the US House of Representatives marked up and passed HR 1667, the Financial Institution Bankruptcy Act of 2017. The bill would amend Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act and would create a new subchapter V to chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, to establish a new bankruptcy process for certain financial institutions with assets of $50 billion or more. The legislation now goes to the US Senate for full consideration.
Read HR 1667.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Interim Approach to Regulatory Treatment of Accounting Provisions
03/29/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published details of interim regulatory treatment of accounting provisions and standards for transitional arrangements under Basel III capital framework.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Finalizes Phase 2 of Revisions to the Pillar 3 Disclosure Framework
03/29/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a consolidated and enhanced Pillar 3 disclosure framework standard. The Basel Committee announced in June 2014 that it was undertaking a review of Pillar 3. In January 2015, it issued its revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, completing the first phase of the review. This latest publication represents the second phase of the review. The new standard includes enhancements to the revised Pillar 3 framework, such as key regulatory metrics to provide an overview of a bank's prudential position, and a new disclosure requirement for prudent valuation adjustments. It also includes revisions arising from recent developments, such as the new disclosure requirements arising from the total loss-absorbing capacity regime for global systemically important banks and the revised standard on market risk issued on January 14, 2016. The new standard consolidates all Basel Committee disclosure requirements into the Pillar 3 framework, covering the composition of capital, the leverage ratio, the liquidity ratios, the indicators for determining globally systemically important banks, the countercyclical capital buffer, interest rate risk in the banking book and remuneration.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Governor Powell Defends the Structure of the US Federal Reserve System
03/28/2017
US Federal Reserve Board Governor Jerome Powell provided remarks regarding the history and structure of the Federal Reserve System. Against calls for reform of the Federal Reserve System, Governor Powell defended its current structure, which he noted is essentially unchanged since it was modified by the Banking Act of 1935. He emphasized the importance of avoiding a concentration of power over US monetary policy and financial system, and the need to address national and regional interests. Pointing to reforms in the Dodd-Frank Act, Powell noted that while the governance structure of the Federal Reserve continues to evolve, the independence of a central bank is paramount. On April, 2015 the US House Financial Services Committee’s monetary policy subcommittee held a hearing on the Federal Reserve's mandate and governance structure.
Read Governor Powell’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Consultation on Internal Ratings Based Approach
03/28/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation paper outlining the Prudential Regulation Authority's proposed changes to the Internal Ratings Based approach. The proposed changes are to clarify the PRA's expectations for UK banks, building societies and PRA designated investment firms applying for IRB approval as outlined in its Supervisory Statement. First, with regard to how a firm can demonstrate that they meet the requirements of the Capital Requirements Regulation on the "prior experience" of using IRB approaches. Second, clarifying the use of external data to supplement internal data for estimating Probability of Default and Loss Given Default for residential mortgages. The PRA has also proposed two reference points for estimating Probability of Possession Given Default for residential mortgages for firms that lack significant possession data. Responses to the consultation are due by June 28, 2017. The PRA aims to publish an updated Supervisory Statement in October 2017.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Key Elements of 2017 Stress Test
03/27/2017
The Bank of England has published the key elements of its 2017 stress test. The 2017 test will comprise two scenarios, the annual cyclical scenario and, for the first time, a biennial exploratory scenario. The stressed outcome for UK activity and unemployment is the same as in the 2016 annual cyclical scenario. However for the global economy, the stressed outcome is worse than 2016, largely reflecting the continued and rapid growth of credit in China. The current cyclical scenario will incorporate a sudden increase in the rate of return investors demand for holding pounds sterling with an associated fall in the value sterling. This is particularly relevant due to the vulnerability created by the UK's large current account deficit. The 2017 scenario also differs from the 2016 exercise as it incorporates a rise in the bank rate (in 2016 the bank rate was cut to zero). The purpose of the exploratory scenario is to consider how the UK banking system might evolve if the recent headwinds to bank profitability persist or intensify. The Bank of England will publish the results of the stress test sometime between October and the end of December 2017.
View the stress test scenarios and elements.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Issue Joint Report to Congress under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act
03/21/2017
Member agencies of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), including the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC, OCC and the National Credit Union Administration issued a joint report to Congress detailing their review of rules affecting financial institutions. The review was conducted as part of the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) as part of the agencies’ continued efforts to reduce regulatory burdens while ensuring the safety and soundness of US financial institutions. EGRPRA requires the federal banking agencies, along with the FFIEC, to conduct a review of their rules at least every 10 years to identify outdated or unnecessary regulations.
The report describes several joint actions planned or taken by the federal financial institutions regulators, including: (i) simplifying regulatory capital rules for community banks and savings associations; (ii) streamlining reports of condition and income (call reports); (iii) increasing the appraisal threshold for commercial real estate loans; and (iv) expanding the number of institutions eligible for less frequent examination cycles. The report also describes the individual actions taken by each agency to update its own rules, eliminate unnecessary requirements, and streamline supervisory procedures.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Finalizes Guidance to Banks on Non-Performing Loans
03/20/2017
The European Central Bank has published final Guidance to banks on non-performing loans. The Guidance applies immediately to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. The Guidance is not legally binding but a bank will need to explain, upon request, why it does not comply. Any non-compliance could lead to supervisory action being taken. Eurozone banks are expected to apply the Guidance proportionately with those banks that have a high level of NPLs taking greater actions. The ECB emphasizes that an NPL strategy should outline the bank's approach and objectives regarding the effective management and ultimate reduction of NPL stocks in a clear, credible and feasible manner for each relevant portfolio.
View the final Guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards on the Exchange of Information between Regulators Regarding Qualify Holdings Published
03/17/2017
Final EU Implementing Technical Standards on common procedures, forms and templates for the consultation process between national regulators when carrying out prudential assessments relating to proposed acquisitions of qualifying holdings in credit institutions have been published. The Capital Requirements Directive requires regulators to consult each other when assessing a proposed acquirer of qualifying holdings. The ITS supplements the CRD by setting out requirements on the designation of contact points by regulators, and the timeframe and process for submitting the consultation notice and responding. The ITS also prescribes the templates for the response from the regulator from whom information has been requested. It also outlines language requirements, methods of communication and the mutual feedback process. The ITS enter into force on April 6, 2017.
View the ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Raises Asset Threshold for Bank Mergers
03/16/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that it was raising the asset threshold for bank mergers that it considers unlikely to pose systemic. In an order approving the merger of People’s United Financial Inc. and Suffolk Bancorp, the Federal Reserve stated that in its experience, proposals involving an acquisition of less than $10 billion in assets, or that result in a firm with less than $100 billion in total assets, were generally unlikely to create institutions that pose systemic risks. The previous thresholds were $2 billion and $25 billion, respectively. Proposals below the threshold generally receive a more streamlined regulatory review.
View text of Federal Reserve order approving the merger.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Guidelines for the Identification and Management of Step-in Risk
03/15/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published draft Guidelines on the identification and management of step-in risk. The draft Guidelines follow a previous Basel Committee consultation that was launched in December 2015. Step-in risk relates to the risk that a bank might support unconsolidated entities, beyond the bank's contractual obligations, in order to protect itself from any reputational damage that may result from connections to such entities. The materialization of such risk, if not appropriately anticipated, could result in the erosion of bank's capital and liquidity position. The Committee has expanded its identification criteria by building on the comments received during the first consultation to take into account the risk characteristics of entities involved in addition to the banks' relationships with them. The Basel Committee has adopted a tailored approach in formulating its prudential response and is seeking comments by May 15, 2017.
View the consultation page.
View the draft Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Comptroller of the Currency Discusses Value of International Collaboration and Professional Bank Supervision
03/13/2017
Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry gave a speech at the Institute of International Bankers’ Annual Washington Conference, discussing the value of international collaboration and bank supervision. In his comments, Comptroller Curry noted that “the fundamentals of [sound] banking remain the same—strong capital, ample liquidity, controlled leverage, and limited concentrations.”
View the text of speech.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Confirms that the Imposition of Stricter Conditions for Banks Not Necessary Due to Market Developments
03/08/2017
The European Commission published a report on market developments over the past year that would potentially have created the need for stricter requirements for the level of banks' own funds, large exposures and public disclosure. The Capital Requirements Regulation allows the Commission to impose stricter conditions if measures are necessary to address changes in micro-prudential and macro-prudential risks arising from market developments, in or outside the EU, affecting all Member States, and if the tools provided for in the CRR and the Capital Requirements Directive are not sufficient to address these risks. Such stricter requirements could be based on the recommendation or the opinion of the European Stability Risk Board or the European Banking Authority. The Commission's report concludes that no such circumstances have transpired. The EU financial stability risks identified in the report include: (i) the possible risk re-pricing of risk premia in global financial markets, amplified by low liquidity; (ii) risks of further weakening of banks’ and insurers’ balance sheets; (ii) risks of deterioration of debt sustainability in sovereign, corporate and household sectors; and (iv) risks posed by contagion and exposures to shadow banking entities.
View the report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Guidelines on Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure Published
03/08/2017
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on liquidity coverage ratio disclosure to complement the disclosure requirements of liquidity risk management under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR provides a general disclosure framework for firms for each category of risk where liquidity risk should be considered. The disclosure of key ratios and figures to regulators required under the CRR specifies the liquidity coverage ratio. The LCR is the only regulatory ratio to cover liquidity and is crucial for disclosure, as it provides essential information for the assessment of liquidity risk management and for the decision-making processes of market participants.
The Guidelines set out the general disclosure framework of risk management in relation to liquidity risk, providing a harmonized structure for the disclosure of information and detailing the information on the LCR that is required to be disclosed within the key ratios and figures. The Guidelines include: (i) a qualitative and quantitative harmonized table for the disclosure of key information; and (ii) quantitative and qualitative harmonized templates for the disclosure of the LCR composition and levels.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposals for Powers to Adopt Implementing Decisions
03/07/2017
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on improving the decision-making framework for supervisory reporting requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR imposes an obligation on the EBA to prepare Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting requirements. Once the final draft ITS is sent to the European Commission, there are timeframes (usually three months, extendable by one month) built into the relevant EU legislation for the Commission to endorse the ITS. However, there has often been a gap between the EBA providing the final draft ITS and the Commission’s final endorsement. The ITS on supervisory reporting requirements needs to be updated regularly and corrections and clarifications are needed too. The delayed finalisation of changes made to the ITS have caused problems for financial institutions, national regulators and the EBA.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft EU Standards on Disclosure Requirements for Encumbered and Unencumbered Assets
03/03/2017
The European Banking Authority has published a report and final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the disclosure of encumbered and unencumbered assets. The final draft RTS will supplement the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR requires the EBA to develop draft RTS on the requirements on firms to disclose balance sheet value per exposure class, broken down by asset quality and the total amount of unencumbered assets on the balance sheet. The final draft RTS set out the data required to be disclosed, the format, and timing of the disclosure. In developing the final draft RTS, the EBA has taken into account the European Systematic Risk Board's recommendations, which included that the EBA and regulators should monitor the level, evolution and types of asset encumbrance. The final draft RTS prescribes a harmonized definition of encumbrance. This will enable market participants to compare firms in a clear and consistent manner. The final draft RTS provides four disclosure templates and a box for narrative information to be completed by firms on the importance of the encumbrance in their funding model. The final draft RTS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
View the report and final draft RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Seek Comment on FFIEC 101
03/01/2017
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC issued a proposal to remove two items from Schedule B of form FFIEC 101, the report entitled Risk-Based Capital Reporting for Institutions Subject to the Advanced Capital Adequacy Framework. The two items proposed for removal collect exposure at default (EAD) information related to credit valuation adjustments (CVAs) that already is captured in a separate item on FFIEC 101 Schedule B. No other changes are proposed to the FFIEC 101. Comments are due by May 1, 2017.
View the Proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Technical Standards on the Nature, Severity and Duration of an Economic Downturn
03/01/2017
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR requires firms to use loss given default (LGD) and conversion factor (CF) estimates appropriate for an economic downturn if those are more conservative than the respective long-run average. The EBA consultation paper includes proposed draft Regulatory Technical Standards and amended Guidelines on probability of default (PD) and LGD estimation. The proposed draft RTS set out the downturn conditions that firms must use to estimate the downturn LGDs and conversion factors. In addition, the EBA is proposing to amend the proposed Guidelines on PD and LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted assets to include a method for firms to use to reflect the downturn conditions into downturn LGD and CF factors. The consultation closes on May 29, 2017.
View the consultation paper.
View the proposed Guidelines on PD and LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted assets.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Launches Sensitivity Analysis on Effects of Interest Rate Changes
02/28/2017
The European Central Bank launched a sensitivity analysis of the banking books of directly supervised banks with a focus on interest rate changes. The analysis will be used to inform the ECB’s annual Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process and stress test. Under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, the ECB directly supervises significant banks, and indirectly supervises smaller or “less significant” banks, located in the Eurozone. The ECB is required to organize annual supervisory tests under the Capital Requirements Directive. The ECB will apply six hypothetical interest rate shocks, as set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in the “Standards – Interest rate risk in the banking book”, which was published in April 2016. The ECB notes that the shocks will capture various scenarios with changes in the level and shape of the interest rate curve and will give the supervisors information on how the economic value of the banking book equity and the net interest income projections will change under each shock test. The exercise commenced on February 28, 2017 and the results will be used as part of the SREP assessment in calibrating the Pillar 2 guidance.
View the press release.
View 2017 stress test FAQs.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Timing for EU 2018 Stress Test Announced
02/27/2017
The European Banking Authority announced that the 2018 EU stress test would be launched at the beginning of 2018 and results would be published mid-2018. The EBA is currently preparing the methodology and templates and intends to discuss these with the industry in Q3 2017.
View the EBA's announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Proposals on Pillar 2A Capital Framework
02/24/2017
The Prudential Regulation Authority launched a consultation on proposed changes to the Pillar 2A capital framework. The Pillar 2A framework is effectively a layer of regulatory capital beyond standard requirements based on firm-specific quantitative requirements rather than regulatory discretion.
The PRA is proposing to revise the IRB benchmark, adjust the Pillar 2A approach for firms using the standardized approach for credit risk and include additional considerations for firms using both the standardized approach and IFRS as their accounting framework. The proposals are relevant to banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. Responses to the consultation are due by May 31, 2017. The proposed implementation date for the updated Pillar 2A capital framework is January 1, 2018. The PRA will consider whether further changes are needed to the Pillar 2 framework as a result of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the European Commission's related proposals.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Announces Annual Adjustment to the Asset-Size Threshold in Regulation I
02/22/2017
The US Federal Reserve Board announced the annual adjustment to the asset-size threshold in Regulation I, which determines the dividend rate that certain member banks earn on their Federal Reserve Bank stock. The updated total consolidated asset threshold is $10,122,000,000.
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act of 2015 provides that depository institution stockholders with total consolidated assets above the asset-size threshold shall receive a dividend on paid-in capital stock equal to the lesser of (i) 6 percent or (ii) the most recent 10-year Treasury auction rate prior to the dividend payment. The dividend rate for other member banks remains at 6 percent.
View notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Bank Regulators Issue Revised Economic Scenarios for 2017 Stress Testing
02/10/2017
The US Federal Reserve Board, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation each released revised economic scenarios for use by certain financial institutions with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion for the 2017 stress tests as required under the Dodd-Frank Act. The agencies had previously issued scenarios on February 6, 2017 however, these scenarios contained incorrect historical values for the BBB corporate yield in 2016.
The scenarios represent baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios and include key variables that reflect economic activity, including unemployment, exchange rates, prices, income, interest rates and other relevant aspects of the economy and financial markets. While the baseline scenario represents expectations of private sector economic forecasters, the adverse and severely adverse scenarios are hypothetical scenarios designed to assess the strength and resilience of financial institutions and their ability to continue to meet the credit needs of households and businesses under stressed economic conditions.
View Federal Reserve Board’s revised stress test scenarios.
View OCC’s stress test scenarios.
View FDIC’s revised stress test scenarios.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft Technical Standards on the Exclusion of Transactions with Non-EU Non-Financial Counterparties from Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk
02/09/2017
The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the procedures for excluding transactions with non-financial counterparties established in a third country (which do not hold positions over the clearing threshold, or so called NFC-s) from the own funds requirement for credit valuation adjustment risk. The final draft RTS will supplement the requirements of the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA consulted on proposed draft RTS in August 2015. Firms' transactions with any NFC- will be excluded from the own funds requirements for CVA risk under the CRR, whether or not the NFC- is established in the EU. As NFC-s established in non-EU countries are not subject directly to EU regulation, the final draft RTS clarify that firms are responsible for: (i) taking the necessary steps to identify all NFC-s under this exemption and calculating accordingly their own funds requirements for CVA risk; (ii) ensuring that exempt counterparties established outside the EU would qualify as NFC-s if they were established in the EU; and (iii) ensuring that counterparties calculate the clearing threshold according to the relevant provisions in EMIR and do not exceed those thresholds. The EBA has also included an option for firms to verify the status of third country counterparties at the time of trade inception or on a periodic basis to take account of the situation that firms frequently enter into trades with NFC-s established in a third country. The final draft RTS align the treatment of NFC-s established in a non-EU country with the treatment of NFC-s established in the EU as recommended by the EBA in its February 2015 report. The final draft RTS has been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
View the RTS.
-
EU Technical Standards on Additional Collateral Outflows for Derivative Transactions Published
02/08/2017
A Commission Delegated Regulation, in the form of Regulatory Technical Standards, on additional liquidity outflows corresponding to collateral needs resulting from the impact of an adverse market scenario on an institution's derivatives transactions was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires firms to add an additional outflow for collateral needs that would result from an adverse market scenario on a firm's derivatives transactions, financing transactions and other contracts if material. Due to materiality considerations, the EU has adopted the RTS for derivatives transactions first. The rules apply only to collateralized derivative transactions, including those that mature within 30 days. The RTS require that the calculation of the additional collateral outflows be based on the Historical Look Back Approach for market valuation changes developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The text of the final RTS does not materially differ from the revised draft RTS, which the European Banking Authority submitted to the European Commission on May 3, 2016. The RTS will enter into force on February 28, 2017 and will apply directly across the EU.
View the RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Releases CCAR Stress Test Scenarios for 2017
02/03/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released the scenarios to be used by banks and supervisors for the 2017 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and stress test exercises (DFAST) mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. The Federal Reserve Board concurrently issued instructions to firms participating in CCAR. For the 2017 cycle, a total of 13 of the largest and most complex bank holding companies will be subject to both the quantitative evaluation of their capital adequacy as well as a qualitative evaluation of their capital planning capabilities. The Federal Reserve Board had announced earlier, on January 30, 2017, that 21 firms with less complex operations will no longer be subject to the qualitative portion of CCAR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Standards on Benchmarking Portfolio Assessments Published
02/03/2017
A Commission Delegated Regulation in the form of Regulatory Technical Standards for benchmarking portfolio assessment standards and assessment-sharing procedures was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS supplement the Capital Requirements Directive. The CRD requires that national regulators monitor the range of risk-weighted exposure amounts or own funds requirements (except as regards operation risk) for the exposures or those relating to transactions in benchmark portfolios resulting from the internal approaches adopted by firms. Regulators are also required to assess, at least annually, the quality of the relevant approaches adopted by firms. The EBA is required to assist regulators in their assessments. The RTS set out the standards for the assessment by national regulators and procedures for sharing of those assessments with other relevant EU national regulators and with the EBA. The RTS enter into force on February 23, 2017 and will apply directly across the EU.
View the RTS.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Amendments to Capital Plan and Stress Test Rules
01/30/2017
The US Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule amending the capital plan and stress test rules effective for the 2017 cycle. The final rule removes large and noncomplex firms, specifically those with total consolidated assets of at least $50 billion but less than $250 billion, nonbank assets of less than $75 billion, and that are not deemed, pursuant to the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Q, to be US global systemically important banks, from the qualitative assessment of the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review, thereby significantly reducing the burden on such firms. Accordingly, the qualitative review in CCAR is now focused on the 13 largest, most complex financial institutions.
View text of the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Examination Procedures on Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management Guidance
01/24/2017
The OCC issued examination procedures to supplement OCC Bulletin 2013-29 entitled “Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management Guidance,” which was originally issued October 30, 2013. These procedures use the concepts and definitions in OCC Bulletin 2013-29 but are designed to help examiners: (i) tailor the examination of each bank commensurate with the level of risk and complexity of the bank’s third-party relationships; (ii) assess the quantity of the bank’s risk associated with its third-party relationships; (iii) assess the quality of the bank’s risk management of third-party relationships involving critical activities; and (iv) determine whether there is an effective risk management process throughout the life cycle of the third-party relationship. The procedures include detailed questions examiners can ask when examining covered national banks and federal savings associations.
View the examination procedures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Final Guidelines on Application of Definition of Default Enter Into Force
01/19/2017
The European Banking Authority published translations of the final Guidelines specifying the application of the definition of default in relation to the Internal Ratings Based Approach and the Standardized Approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Publication of the translations triggers the date by which national regulators must inform the EBA as to whether they intend to comply with the Guidelines. That notification is due by March 20, 2017. The Guidelines will apply to national regulators and firms from January 1, 2021. However, national regulators have discretion to accelerate implementation of the Guidelines. The CRR sets out the definition of default of an obligor that is used for the purposes of the IRB and Standardized Approaches. The purpose of the Guidelines is to harmonize the definition of default across the EU framework so that EU banks apply regulatory requirements to their capital positions in a more consistent and comparable way, especially in the context of IRB models.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Rule Adjusting Maximum Civil Money Penalties
01/18/2017
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System finalized a rule increasing the maximum civil money penalty limits for 2017, as required by law. A civil money penalty is a fine imposed by a federal agency to penalize misconduct.
In November 2015, a law was passed that requires all federal agencies to adjust their maximum civil money penalty limits annually for inflation, rather than every four years as previously required. The maximum civil money penalty limits depend on several factors, including the severity and type of violation. Additionally, the law dictates the annual adjustment formula for federal agencies.
The new penalty amounts apply as of January 15, 2017.
View the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Authorities Publish Report on Joint Functioning of EU Capital Requirements and European Market Infrastructure Regulation
01/18/2017
The European Banking Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority published a Report on the joint functioning of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. The focus of the Report is on capital requirements for central counterparties that also hold a banking license, leverage and liquidity for CCPs, large exposures, difference in application of the margin period of risk and the requirements on a client's exposures to clearing members.
The EBA and ESMA note that although the EMIR and CRR requirements may appear to be redundant for CCPs holding a bank license, because some aspects of the EMIR requirements are more stringent, they are in fact based on different definitions of capital and take into account different types of risks. Therefore, CCPs holding a banking license are subject to both capital requirements as matter of principle, with some exemptions when they are properly justified. There are currently 17 authorized CCPs, of which three hold a banking license - Eurex Clearing AG, LCH Clearnet SA and European Commodity Clearing AG.
Read more.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Final Legislation Specifying Conditions for Data Waiver Permissions Published
01/14/2017
A Commission Delegated Regulation, in the form of Regulatory Technical Standards specifying conditions for data waiver permissions, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Capital Requirements Regulation outlines the requirements specific to own-loss given default (“own-LGD”) for regulators when quantifying the risk parameters to be associated with rating grades or pools. The RTS lays down the mandatory conditions under which national regulators may grant firms permissions to use data covering a period of two years, rather than five years, for probability of default, own-LGD and own-conversion factor estimates as set out in the CRR. The RTS stipulates that exposures to central governments, central banks, banks and investment firms would be eligible for data waiver permissions, subject to certain additional requirements being met. First, exposures to corporates would be eligible for data waiver permissions where they are not structurally characterized by few or no observed defaults. Second, types of exposures which were not included in the bank or investment firm’s portfolio at the time when the firm started to implement the Internal Ratings Based Approach should not be eligible for a data waiver permission.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Adopts Procedure for Investigating Breach of EU Law by National Regulators
01/11/2017
The European Banking Authority published a Decision of the Board of Supervisors of the EBA, dated December 23, 2016, adopting Rules of Procedure for the investigation of a breach of EU law. The Regulation establishing the EBA gives the EBA the power to investigate an alleged failure by a national regulator to apply the requirements of the Capital Requirements Regulation or the Capital Requirements Directive or their application in a way which appears to be a breach of EU law. The Decision sets out factors, criteria and other related matters that the EBA will take into account when it receives a request from a third party to initiate an investigation or to EBA own initiative investigations.
View the Decision.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Updates the Recommendations on Equivalence of Confidentiality Regimes
01/11/2017
The European Banking Authority published an updated recommendation on the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes of third country supervisory authorities. The EU Capital Requirements Directive provides that third country supervisory authorities may participate in a college of supervisors set up for an international cross-border bank if: (i) it is considered appropriate for that authority to participate; and (ii) the authority is subject to confidentiality requirements that are equivalent to those set out in the CRD. The EBA's recommendations only relate to the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes. The appropriateness issue is to be determined by each college of supervisors.
In April 2015, the EBA recommended that the confidentiality regimes of the supervisory authorities in the following countries should be considered as equivalent to the CRD IV requirements: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, China, FYR Macedonia, Mexico, Montenegro, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey and the United States. Those recommendations applied from April 2, 2015. The EBA updated the recommendations to include Albania from September 12, 2015.
The EBA has updated the recommendations again adding Australia, Hong Kong, Japan and Kosovo. The latest recommendations applied from January 12, 2017.
View the updated recommendations.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Semiannual Risk Report
01/05/2017
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released its Semiannual Risk Perspective for Fall 2016, which highlights key risks facing national banks and federal savings associations. The report highlighted that strategic risk remains high as banks make changes to their business models and adopt innovative products. The OCC also noted that banks continue to ease underwriting practices to boost loan volume and to respond to competition from bank and nonbank lenders in commercial, commercial real estate and auto lending, according to the report. The credit risk associated with such practices is increasing due to increased risk layering, rising loan policy exceptions and weaker covenant protection. The report cited operational risk as another key risk, particularly cybersecurity threats, increased reliance on third-party relationships and the need for sound governance over sales practices. The report is based on data received from national banks and federal saving associations through June 30, 2016.
View Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Translation of its Guidelines on Corrections to Duration for Debt Instruments
01/04/2017
The European Banking Authority published translations of the final Guidelines on the correction required for the calculation of Modified Duration for debt instruments subject to prepayment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Guidelines will apply from March 1, 2017.
The CRR establishes two methods to calculate capital requirements for general interest rate risk. The relevant methods are the Maturity-Based calculation and the Duration-Based calculation of general risk. The final Guidelines apply to the Duration-Based calculation. The Duration-Based calculation uses the concept of Modified Duration pursuant to the formula outlined in the CRR. This method is only valid for instruments that are not subject to prepayment risk. The EBA is mandated to issue guidelines establishing how to correct the Modified Duration calculation to reflect prepayment risk. The EBA Guidelines propose two approaches to correct the calculation. One option is to treat the debt instrument with prepayment risk as if it is a combination of a plain vanilla bond and an embedded option. The Modified Duration of the plain vanilla bond is therefore corrected with the change in value of the embedded option, which is estimated according to its theoretical delta, resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The other option is to directly calculate the change in value of the whole instrument subject to the prepayment risk resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates.
View the Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delay to Finalizing Basel III
01/03/2017
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced that it had, along with the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision, made progress towards completing the Basel Committee’s post-crisis regulatory reforms, known as Basel III. However, despite the progress, more time is needed to finalize some areas, including the final calibration, before those proposals can be reviewed by the GHOS. This impacts the meeting of the GHOS which had been scheduled for early January, which has been postponed accordingly. The Basel Committee gave no specific date as to when the work would be completed, saying only that it expects to complete the work in the near future.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Requests Extension for Delivery of Draft Technical Standards under EU Capital Requirements Legislation
01/03/2017
The European Banking Authority published a letter, dated December 23, 2016, in which it requests an extension of time from the European Commission for delivering certain draft technical standards which were due to be delivered by December 31, 2016 under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA is requesting an extension for the Regulatory Technical Standards and the Implementing Technical Standards on the authorization of banks because of a combination of its significant workload and considerable resource constraints and issues arising in respect of new entrants and FinTech companies in addition to the need to achieve a balance between allowing Member States to retain their own authorization processes whilst harmonizing the information required. The EBA expects to be able to deliver the ITS and RTS by mid-2017.
The EBA is also requesting an extension for the RTS on consolidation methods which it has experienced difficulties with because of the interactions with the Basel framework and with the European Commission's recent adoption of legislation to amend CRR. The EBA expects to be able to finalize the draft RTS by the end of 2017.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Release Annual Community Reinvestment Act Asset-Size Threshold Adjustments for Small and Intermediate Small Institutions
12/29/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced the annual adjustment to the asset-size thresholds used to define small bank, small savings association, intermediate small bank and intermediate small savings association under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US OCC issued a final rule, 12 C.F.R. § 7.1022, that prohibits national banks and federal savings associations (FSAs) from dealing or investing in industrial or commercial metals.
12/28/2016
The OCC issued a final rule, 12 C.F.R. § 7.1022, that prohibits national banks and federal savings associations (FSAs) from dealing or investing in industrial or commercial metals.
The final rule covers metal, including alloy, in a physical form primarily suited to industrial or commercial uses, such as copper cathodes and aluminum T-bars. The final rule supersedes a prior OCC determination permitting national banks to trade copper. The rule, however, still recognizes that national banks and FSAs may hold industrial or commercial metal under authorities that are distinct from dealing and investing. For example, national banks and FSAs may acquire industrial or commercial metal through foreclosures on loans and then sell the metal to mitigate loan losses.
The rule carries out an OCC recommendation included in its report to Congress and the Financial Stability Oversight Council under section 620 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 620 required the federal banking agencies to conduct a study of the activities and investments that banking entities may engage in under state and federal law and to consider the associated risks and how banking entities mitigate those risks.
The effective date of the final rule is April 1, 2017. Banks with existing holdings of industrial and commercial metal acquired through dealing or investing activities must divest of such metal as soon as reasonably practical, but no later than one year after the effective date of the final rule, subject to four one-year extensions available from the OCC in particular cases.
View the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Releases Global Indicator Amounts for G-SIB Surcharge Calculation
12/28/2016
The US Federal Reserve published the aggregate global indicator amounts for the purposes of calculating the “Method 1” G-SIB Surcharge for 2016. The Federal Reserve Board’s G-SIB surcharge rule establishes a methodology to identify global systemically important bank holding companies in the United States based on certain indicators that are correlated with systemic importance. Under the G-SIB surcharge rule, a firm must calculate its G-SIB score using a specific formula (“Method 1”).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Cyclicality of EU Capital Requirements Framework
12/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report on the cyclicality of banks' capital requirements. The report examines whether the EU's risk-sensitive capital requirements create unintended pro-cyclical effects and whether any remedial steps are necessary or justified. The EU's capital requirements framework is set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV. CRR requires the European Commission to prepare a biennial report for the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on the issue. This report from the EBA is intended to feed into that report.
The EBA concludes that the impact of the EU capital requirements framework on the EU economic cycle is limited and that there are no strong reasons for shifting from the risk-sensitive framework. The EBA notes that EU banking legislation provides tools for regulators to respond to any pro-cyclicality concerns, as appropriate, and recommends periodic monitoring of the potentially cyclical impact of the EU bank regulatory framework (not only regulatory capital) and further research into the effectiveness and efficiency of counter-cyclical instruments.
View the EBA's report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Releases a New Handbook for De Novo Institutions Applying for Deposit Insurance
12/22/2016
The FDIC released a handbook, developed to facilitate the process of establishing new banks, by offering guidance for navigating the phases of establishing an insured institution. The handbook, titled “Applying for Deposit Insurance—A Handbook for Organizers of De Novo Institutions,” is part of recent efforts by the FDIC to increase transparency and clarity regarding the deposit insurance application process. The standards in the Handbook relax certain requirements that had been imposed as a result of the financial crisis. Comments on the handbook are due February 20, 2017.
View handbook.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Equivalence Decision on Recognized Third Countries for Treatment of Exposures of Banks
12/21/2016
A Commission Implementing Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, updating the list of third countries with equivalent regulatory arrangements in relation to prudential requirements for banks and investment firms for the purpose of the treatment of exposures. The Decision lists the countries whose arrangements for supervision and regulation of banks and investment firms are deemed by the European Commission to be equivalent to the standards of the EU as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Decision is based on assessments that reviewed the supervisory and regulatory arrangements in each country for: (i) banks; (ii) investment firms; and (iii) exchanges. The following nations and territory are now equivalent across categories (i) and (ii): Turkey, New Zealand, the Faroe Islands and Greenland. This Decision will enter into force on January 10, 2016.
View the list of equivalent third countries and territories.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority's Third Report on Impact of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio
12/21/2016
The European Banking Authority published its third impact assessment report for the liquidity coverage ratio requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. CRR mandates the EBA to prepare the LCR impact assessment report annually. The aim of the report is to assess the impact of the EU's LCR regulation on the EU banking sector. The report indicates a constant improvement of the average LCR across EU banks since 2011. In addition, it states that the average LCR for EU banks at the end of December 2015 was approximately 134%, with an aggregate gross shortfall of EUR 10.9 billion. This increase has been attributed to an increase in liquid assets.
The EBA is also required to report to the European Commission on whether the EU's timeframe should be amended to fit with the Basel III timeline. The report reviews the phasing-in of the liquidity coverage requirements, in particular, assessing whether there is a case for deferring the introduction of the 100% minimum binding standard from January 1, 2018 until January 1, 2019. Under the CRR and related secondary legislation, the EU LCR minimum requirement was set at 60% from October 1, 2015 and is gradually increasing to 100% in January 2018, a year ahead of the Basel implementation date. The EBA concludes that there is no significant evidence to recommend amending the current transitional framework because the existing level of non-compliance with the LCR under full implementation is low.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Finalize Guidelines for the Prudential Assessment of Acquisitions and Qualifying Holdings
12/20/2016
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities published a report outlining final joint Guidelines for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in the financial sector. The Joint Committee consists of the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The final Guidelines follow a consultation on draft guidelines published on July 3, 2015, and will replace previous guidelines published by the ESAs’ predecessors in 2008.
The purpose of the final Guidelines is to provide legal certainty and clarity on assessment processes relating to increases of control and acquisitions of banks, investment firms and insurance firms, bringing a more harmonized, clear and transparent process in prudential assessments by national regulators. In addition, the final Guidelines seek to provide clearer details on what information is required from proposed acquirers. The guidelines cover questions related to: (i) indirect acquisitions of qualifying holdings, persons acting in concert and decisions to acquire; (ii) assessment periods; and (iii) financial soundness of acquirers. The report summarizes the main points and comments that were raised in the twelve responses to its Consultation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Recommendations for the EU Covered Bonds Framework
12/20/2016
The European Banking Authority published recommendations for harmonizing the EU framework for covered bonds. For banks investing in covered bonds that meet certain criteria, the Capital Requirements Regulation sets preferential risk weights to be applied. The recommendations are set out in a report which builds on the EBA's 2014 Report on EU covered bond frameworks and capital treatment. The aim of the recommendations is to ensure that only financial instruments which comply with certain harmonized structural, credit risk and prudential standards are capable of being covered bonds, and as such have access to the special regulatory and capital treatment provided. Harmonizing the EU framework on covered bonds is part of the Capital Markets Union initiative launched by the European Commission in September 2015
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Proposals for Designation and Supervision of Significant-Plus Branches
12/20/2016
The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft Guidelines on supervision of significant branches. The proposed Guidelines set out how the consolidating supervisor, the home supervisor and the host supervisor should cooperate to prudentially supervise and coordinate monitoring of significant branches requiring intensified supervision. An "intensification test" is proposed to assess which branches should be designated as significant-plus branches. Significant-plus branches will be those that are assessed as important for the firm of the group or as performing critical functions or as important for the financial stability of the host Member State. A branch that is assessed to be a significant-plus branch would be subject to intensified supervision which would entail, amongst other things, a separate branch risk assessment, regular on-the-spot checks and inspections, extensive sharing of supervisory intelligence, coordinated application of supervisory and precautionary measures and reflection of the branch in the firm&'s recovery planning. The consultation closes on March 20, 2017.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Approves Rule Requiring Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure
12/19/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule requiring large (generally defined as consolidated assets of $50 billion or more) depository institution holding companies, and certain nonbank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve, to publicly disclose their liquidity coverage ratio. The final rule requires these covered financial institutions to publicly disclose quantitative and qualitative information regarding their liquidity coverage ratio calculation on a quarterly basis. The disclosures must be made in a direct and prominent manner on the company’s public internet site or in a public financial or other public regulatory report and must remain available for five years. The Federal Reserve stated that requiring institutions to report their medium-term liquidity position would provide “a better indication of the overall strengths and weaknesses of a company’s liquidity position” rather than an examination of short-term swings in a company’s liquidity position. The final rule is similar to the rule proposed in November 2015; however, the rule as adopted extends the implementation timeline of the public disclosure requirements by nine months. Under the new rule, covered companies, which include those that have $700 billion or more in total consolidated assets or those that have $10 trillion or more in assets under custody, will need to start complying with the public disclosure requirements beginning on April 1, 2017. Other covered companies will be required to comply with the public disclosure requirements beginning on April 1, 2018.
View text of the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Issue FAQs Regarding Implementing New Accounting Standards for Credit Losses
12/19/2016
The US Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the US National Credit Union Administration and the OCC issued FAQs to assist institutions in implementing the new accounting standard for credit losses, which was recently issued by the US Financial Accounting Standards Board. The new standard, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses,” replaces the existing incurred loss methodology in US GAAP and establishes the new current expected credit losses methodology (CECL). The FAQs expand on the “Joint Statement on the New Accounting Standard on Financial Instruments—Credit Losses,” which the agencies issued in June 2016. The agencies plan to continue issuing FAQs regarding the implementation of the CECL methodology.
View notice to the banks.
View FAQs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Consults on Internal Loss-absorbing Capacity of G-SIBs
12/16/2016
The Financial Stability Board published a consultative paper containing draft Guiding Principles on the internal total loss-absorbing capacity or Internal TLAC of global systemically important banks. The FSB is proposing the Guiding Principles to support the implementation of the TLAC Standard. The TLAC Standard is designed to ensure that failing G-SIBs will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution. The FSB committed to develop implementation guidance on the TLAC Standard, in particular for internal TLAC. Internal TLAC is the loss-absorbing resources that a resolution entity commits to its material subsidiaries. The proposed Guiding Principles cover, among other things: (i) the process for identifying material sub-groups, the composition of sub-groups, the distribution of internal TLAC between the entities within material sub-groups and the treatment of unregulated or non-bank entities; (ii) the role of home and host authorities and the factors to be considered when determining the size of the internal TLAC requirement; (iii) practical considerations relating to the issuance and composition of internal TLAC; (iv) the trigger mechanism for internal TLAC; and (v) cooperation and coordination between home and host authorities in triggering the write-down and/or conversion into equity of internal TLAC. Responses to the consultation are due by February 10, 2017. The FSB intends to review the technical implementation of the TLAC Standard by the end of 2019.
View the consultative paper.
-
European Central Bank Publishes Outcome of Supervisory Review and 2017 Recommendations on Dividends and Variable Remuneration
12/15/2016
The European Central Bank published the outcome of its second Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process in 2016 and updated Recommendations on dividend distribution and remuneration policies for 2017. The ECB comments that SREP outcomes reveal a broadly stable capital demand for 2017 and that any changes in individual bank levels reflect changes in individual bank risk profiles. The aggregate capital demand by directly supervised banks for 2017 is comparable to that of 2016, with an average of around 10% Common Equity Tier 1. The ECB also imposed liquidity measures that require banks to have higher liquidity coverage ratios than the regulatory minimum.
The updated ECB Recommendations on dividend distribution and remuneration policies are to be adopted in 2017, for the financial year 2016. The ECB has maintained its general stance on both topics whilst accounting for regulatory change on the obligation of the supervisor to differentiate between the types of Pillar 2 capital that a bank is required to hold.
View the press release.
View the recommendations.
-
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Approves Final TLAC Rule
12/15/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule establishing total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) long-term debt (LTD), clean holding company requirements and regulatory capital deductions for US global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and the US intermediate holding companies of non-US G-SIBs. While the final TLAC rule is largely consistent with the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed rule issued in October 2015, the Federal Reserve Board made certain adjustments in the final rule in response to comments received. Notably, the Final Rule: (1) lowered certain of the TLAC and LTD requirements; (2) allows certain US intermediate holding companies to issue external LTD rather than require all such LTD to be issued to the foreign parent company or affiliate; (3) allows for the grandfathering of certain long-term debt including debt that was issued prior to December 31, 2016 and contained acceleration clauses or was governed by foreign law; and (4) removed the phase-in periods provided for under the proposed rule. Institutions that meet the relevant thresholds under the final rule would be required to comply with the requirements by January 1, 2019.
View final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Rules to Reduce Regulatory Burden
12/15/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a final rule to remove outdated or unnecessary provisions of certain rules to reduce regulatory burden. The rule is a result of the OCC’s decennial review of its rules required by the US Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA) of 1996. While the OCC is conducting the EGRPRA review jointly with the other federal financial regulatory agencies, the final rule addresses regulations that are exclusive to the OCC. Of note, the final rule: removes notice and approval requirements for certain changes in permanent capital involving national banks; clarifies national bank director oath requirements; removes certain financial disclosure requirements for national banks; integrates and updates OCC rules for national banks and federal savings associations relating to municipal securities dealers, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 disclosures, securities offering disclosures and insider and affiliate transactions; updates recordkeeping and confirmation requirements for national banks’ and federal savings associations’ securities transactions; and permits the electronic submission of filings required under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act. The OCC has also recommended legislative chances that would remove unnecessary burden for national banks and federal saving associations.
View final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Guidelines on Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosure Requirements
12/14/2016
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines will apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR. The Guidelines apply for year-end 2017 disclosures. However, the EBA recommends that G-SIIs implement these for year-end 2016 disclosures, and strongly encourages implementation of the guidelines for a limited subset of disclosure requirements relating to risk-weighted assets and capital requirements for the year-end 2016 disclosures.
View the final Guidelines.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Finalize Rule Expanding Examination Cycle for Small Insured Depository Institutions and US Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks
12/12/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board and Office of Comptroller of Currency issued interagency final rules that increase the number of small banks and savings associations eligible for an 18-month examination cycle rather than a 12-month cycle. The purpose of the rules is to reduce regulatory compliance costs for smaller institutions, while maintaining safety and soundness protections.
Under the final rules, qualifying well-capitalized and well-managed banks and savings associations with less than $1 billion in total assets are eligible for an 18-month examination cycle. Previously, only firms with less than $500 million in total assets were eligible for extended examination cycle. Qualifying well-capitalized and well-managed US branches and agencies of foreign banks with less than $1 billion in total assets are also eligible.
These rules have been in effect since February 29, 2016, pursuant to interim final rules previously adopted by the agencies. After soliciting comment on interim final rules, the agencies have re-issued them as final rules. Final rules are identical to interim final rules.
View final rules.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Statement of Policy Regarding Illiquid Fund Investments Under the Volcker Rule
12/12/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a statement of policy regarding how banking entities may seek an extension to conform their investments in certain illiquid hedge funds and private equity funds (covered funds) to the requirements of section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule. As noted below, any such extension requests must be submitted by January 21, 2017.
The Volcker Rule provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act permits the Federal Reserve Board, upon an application by a banking entity, to provide up to an additional five years to conform investments in certain legacy illiquid covered funds where the banking entity had a contractual commitment to invest in the fund as of May 1, 2010. The five-year extension for certain legacy illiquid covered funds is the last conformance period extension that the Federal Reserve Board is authorized to provide banking entities under the statute.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Extends Transitional Measures for Exposures to CCPs Again
12/10/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to central counterparties set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Markets Infrastructure Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The authorization process for existing CCPs established in the European Union is complete but there are still third-country CCPs, notably some based in the US, that are awaiting recognition status. Without an extension of the transitional periods, banks and investment firms in the EU would need to increase their own funds requirements for their exposures to those CCPs that are not yet recognized. The implementing Regulation extends the transitional period by an additional six months to June 15, 2017.
The recent proposals to amend the CRR published by the European Commission include an amendment to these transitional provisions. The proposed amendment would remove the need for the European Commission to continuously extend the transitional period by basing the transitional deadline instead on the timing of an application for recognition by a third country CCP.
View the Implementing Regulation.
View more about the proposed amendments to CRR.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Proposal to Apply Existing Rating System for Bank and Savings and Loan Holding Companies
12/09/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board invited comment on a proposal to fully apply the Federal Reserve Board’s existing rating system for bank holding companies to savings and loan holding companies.
The Dodd-Frank Act transferred responsibility for the regulation and supervision of savings and loan holding companies to the Federal Reserve Board, effective July 2011. Since then, the Federal Reserve Board has applied its rating system to savings and loan holding companies on an “indicative” basis that describes how the savings and loan holding company would be rated. However, the assignment of an unsatisfactory indicative rating has not automatically triggered supervisory action.
The Federal Reserve Board’s rating system is in part used to determine the safety and soundness of a financial institution, as well as potential supervisory responses. Fully applying the rating system to both bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies will help ensure consistent standards and supervision.
The proposal would fully apply the rating system to most savings and loan holding companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board. However, it would not apply to savings and loan holding companies engaged in significant insurance or commercial activities. These firms would instead continue to receive indicative ratings.
Comments on the proposed rule must be received no later than February 13, 2017.
View proposed rule.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Approves Technical Amendments to GSIB Surcharge Rule and Proposes Interim Reporting Rule
12/09/2016
The US Federal Reserve announced the approval of technical amendments to its rule regarding risk-based capital surcharges for US-based global systemically important bank holding companies (GSIB surcharge rule), requiring those firms to hold additional amounts of risk-based capital to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The changes would not materially alter the underlying rule approved by the Federal Reserve Board in July 2015.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Reports on Diversity of Bank and Investment Firm Management Bodies
12/08/2016
The European Commission published a report on benchmarking of diversity practices under the Capital Requirements Directive. The CRD requires banks and investment firms to ensure that the composition of management bodies is sufficiently diverse in terms of age, gender, geographical provenance, education and professional background. Firms are required to put in place a policy promoting management body diversity and to publish the report, the firm's objectives, relevant targets (if any) and the extent to which these have been met. The Commission is required to report to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on the results achieved as a result of the requirements of CRD and on the appropriateness of benchmarking diversity practices. The Commission found that improvements could still be made, both for having a policy in place and achieving greater diversity and highlighted the need for firms and supervisors to take steps to ensure that the policies are put in place. In addition, the Commission concluded that the benchmarking of diversity practices is a useful tool for assessing the impact and effectiveness of the CRD requirements over time and to monitor for compliance. The Commission does not consider that any legislative amendments are required at this time.
View the report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Finalizes Revisions to Form FR Y-7 Filed by Foreign Banking Organizations
12/07/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board published a notice in the Federal Register that it has finalized its proposed revisions to Form FR Y-7Q implementing the home country capital adequacy requirements prescribed in Sections 252.143(b) and 252.154(b) of Regulation YY. These revisions are effective December 31, 2016, except for the three new line items regarding a foreign banking organization’s (FBO) leverage ratio, which are effective March 31, 2018.
The Federal Reserve Board noted that the submission of the information required on Form FR Y-7Q constitutes compliance with both the home country capital adequacy reporting and the certification requirements of Regulation YY. Accordingly, commencing with the FR Y-7Q filings as of December 31, 2016, the Federal Reserve Board will treat each quarterly filing as a certification of the reporting FBO’s home country capital adequacy. The Federal Reserve Board also eliminated the proposed line items for Pillar II buffers and any “other” applicable capital buffer. However, it retained the line item for reporting home country GSIB buffers. Regarding confidentiality, the Federal Reserve Board considers all the required information to be publicly available, but will consider, on a case-by-case basis, requests by individual FBOs for confidential treatment of specific line items.
View the Federal Register notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes its Final Approach to Implementing the Systemic Risk Buffer
12/05/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Statement of Policy setting out its approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer. The SRB is used to prevent and mitigate long term non-cyclical macro-prudential or systemic risks not covered by the Capital Requirements Regulation. It is a firm-specific buffer based on a firm's risk weighted exposures and must be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital. The Statement of Policy is relevant to ring-fenced bodies under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and large building societies that hold more than £25 billion in deposits. These are jointly referred to as "SRB institutions". The UK Independent Commission on Banking recommended that the UK's systemically important SRB institutions be held to a higher capital standard. In addition to these recommendations, the UK legislation implementing the systemic risk buffer requires that the PRA apply the Financial Policy Committee framework as of January 1, 2019. The FPC's framework for the systemic risk buffer was published in May 2016.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Governor Daniel Tarullo Discusses Financial Regulation Since the Crisis
12/02/2016
Federal Reserve Board Governor Tarullo gave a speech defending post-financial crisis efforts to strengthen regulation governing the financial system. Governor Tarullo also criticized recent Republican legislative regulatory reform proposals, including the Financial CHOICE Act’s proposal to raise the leverage ratio of banks to 10% in return for relief from many other prudential requirements, including risk-based capital requirements.
View Governor Tarullo’s remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House of Representatives Passes Legislation Eliminating $50 Billion Asset Threshold for SIFI Designation
12/01/2016
The US House of Representatives passed a bill (H.R. 6392) that would replace the current supervisory framework under the Dodd-Frank Act that automatically subjects all bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to enhanced prudential standards with a system that would authorize the Financial Stability Oversight Council to designate companies on a case-by-case basis if the FSOC makes a final determination that material financial distress at the bank holding company, or the nature, scope, size, scale, concentration, interconnectedness or mix of its activities could threaten the financial stability of the United States. G-SIBs, however, would be treated as if such a determination had been made. In a statement issued in support of the bill, Representative Warren Davidson (R-OH) stated that the bill “prevent[s] the Fed and Treasury from Blindly implementing new regulations proposed by an international entity, whether coming from the [BCBS] or unelected bureaucrats on the Financial Stability Board.” By contrast, Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) called the legislation the “first step in the Trump agenda to deregulate Wall St.”
View text of HR 6392.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry Emphasizes the Need for Strong Capital and Liquidity
11/30/2016
Thomas Curry, Comptroller of the Currency provided remarks at The Clearing House’s Annual Conference, focusing on value of strong capital, the need for liquidity, and importance of effective supervision.
Curry began by highlighting that increased capital requirements, and leverage ratio requirements that supplement these capital standards, have led to large bank holding companies being projected to remain well-capitalized under most severe stress test scenario. He argued against reduction in capital and leverage requirements. He similarly emphasized the importance of strong liquidity requirements that were implemented since the financial crisis and noted that US banks have higher revenues and higher profits than their European counterparts under the new regulations.
Curry discussed the importance of “holistic” supervision, arguing that regulators and banks must continue to improve both metrics and “soft” standards of performance. Curry mentioned a trend in some banks to separate Chairmanship of the Board from the CEO position and noted that the OCC is considering whether it would make sense for all, or all of the largest, federally supervised banks to make the same change. Curry concluded by highlighting the performance of community banks and smaller institutions alongside large institutions and noting the progress made since 2008.
View Comptroller Curry's remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Policy Committee Post-Brexit Referendum Financial Stability Report
11/30/2016
The Bank of England published its latest Financial Stability report. In the Report, the Financial Policy Committee explains the key risks affecting the UK financial system, how it is addressing these risks and the developments since the Brexit referendum. The Report also includes a summary of the results of the Bank of England's 2016 bank stress test.
The first part of the Report outlines in detail the Committee’s analysis of major risks posed to the stability of the UK economy and the action it is taking in light of such risks. The second part of the Report contains a summary of the Committee’s analysis of those risks and of the resilience of the financial system. The Committee comments that since the Referendum, financial stability in the UK has been maintained despite a challenging period of uncertainty around the domestic and global economic outlook. For example, there have been significant movements in asset prices, including a 12% fall in the sterling exchange rate index. The Committee also comments that the outlook for financial stability in the UK remains challenging as the economy has entered into a period of adjustment. Since July, vulnerabilities that stem from the global economic environment and financial markets have further increased, such as the expected expansionary fiscal policy that could follow the recent US election. The Committee comments that the UK banking system is capitalized to sustain the provision of financial services when faced with severe stresses. Since the global financial crisis, UK banks have built up capital resources with the aggregate common equity Tier 1 capital held by major UK banks now at 13.5% of risk-weighted assets (as at September 2016).
Read more. -
Counselor to the US Treasury Secretary, Antonio Weiss, Argues for the Preservation of the FSOC
11/29/2016
Antonio Weiss, Counselor to the US Treasury Secretary, argued that the FSOC has become a “critical nerve center during episodes of market volatility or stress,” providing a forum to assess system-wide risks, which was missing during the financial crisis. In the speech, Weiss stated that the establishment of FSOC has improved the ability of regulators to share information and collaborate in a way that no single regulator can do on its own.
View text of Weiss’s remarks.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Second Impact Assessment on Implementation of IFRS 9
11/24/2016
The European Banking Authority announced the launch of a second impact assessment on the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9. The second impact assessment builds on the findings in the first impact assessment that was published by the EBA in a report on November 10, 2016. The Report analyzes the estimated impact of implementing IFRS 9 on firms and their regulatory capital and assesses the interaction between IFRS 9 and other prudential requirements. The implementation efforts by firms (such as the development of processes, systems and models) are ongoing and the EBA expects that implementation measures will continue to evolve until at least the initial application of IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018. The EBA highlights that smaller banks are lagging in preparation compared to larger banks and notes that firms should not underestimate the work required to implement IFRS 9.
The second impact assessment will include questions focused on specific aspects around the main topics and findings from the first impact assessment. The EBA expects more detailed and accurate information from banks relating to their implementation of IFRS 9 than the previous assessment, as the information previously given reflected that banks were at an early stage of implementation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Guidelines on Implicit Support for Securitization Transactions
11/24/2016
The European Banking Authority published translations of the final Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The substantive content of the Guidelines is unchanged since the final Guidelines were published in August 2016. The publication of the translations triggers the application of the Guidelines which will apply from March 1, 2017.
Examples of relevant transactions include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR places restrictions on providing implicit support to securitizations. These rules apply in addition to the so-called "skin in the game" requirements on originators to retain part of the risk on securitizations. To prevent uncapitalized risks of implicit support, the CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR also states that a transaction is not considered to provide support to a securitization if it is executed under arm’s-length conditions and taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The CRR requires a sponsor or originator institution that has failed to comply with this requirement to, at a minimum, hold own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Dividend Rule
11/23/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule, amending Regulation I to implement provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, a five-year bill that reauthorized, at then-current levels, the core programs providing federal transportation funding to the states. The final rule adopts substantively all of the provisions of the interim final rule issued in February of this year. The rule will reduce the dividend rate for banks with total assets of more than $10 billion to the lesser of 6% or the most recent 10-year Treasury auction rate prior to the dividend payment. The rule also adjusts the treatment of accrued dividends when a Federal Reserve Bank issues or cancels capital stock owned by a large member bank.
View text of the rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Proposes Draft "CRD5" Among Various EU Banking Sector Legislative Amendments
11/23/2016
The European Commission published a package of proposed legislative amendments in relation to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation, the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The amendments aim in part to introduce some of the revised global prudential standards from latest FSB/Basel developments, to apply a more proportionate approach to regulating banks and investment firms depending on their size and complexity and to remove some of the options and discretions that are currently available to EU Member States.
The changes to CRR and CRD IV include a new requirement on non-EU G-SIBs (or non-EU banking groups that have EU firms with total assets of at least EUR 30 billion) that have two or more EU firms to establish an EU intermediate holding company. This controversial proposal does not square well with US or other third country bank structural laws nor will it be reflected in banks' existing resolution and recovery plans, and so will doubtless be a contentious issue as it is developed further.
Read more. -
Final Draft EU Standards on the Assessment Methodology for the Use of Internal Models Published
11/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published a Report and the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation on the assessment methodology national regulators should use when a firm applies for approval to calculate their own funds requirements using their internal models for one or more risk categories. In particular, the final draft RTS cover: (i) the methodology for national regulators to assess whether a firm complies with the requirements to use an Internal Model Approach for market risk; and (ii) the conditions under which national regulators assess the significance of the positions that will be included in the scope of an IMA. When finalizing the final draft RTS, the EBA took into account, to the extent possible under the existing CRR, the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published in January 2016. The final draft RTS have been submitted to the European Commission for consideration.
View the final draft RTS.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Responds to Commission Request for Further Information on Application of Proportionality to Remuneration Provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive
11/21/2016
The European Banking Authority published a response to the European Commission’s request for further information on the EBA’s Opinion on the application of the principle of proportionality to remuneration provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive. On December 21, 2015, the EBA published its first Opinion, recommending a possible set of exemptions from some of the remuneration principles, specifically the variable elements of remuneration. The EBA's proposed amendments included: (i) the application of deferral arrangements; (ii) the pay out in instruments for small and non-complex institutions; and (iii) for identified staff that receive only a low amount of variable remuneration when specific criteria are met. The Commission requested further information from the EBA through a letter dated April 21, 2016 on the issue of proportionality. The EBA responded on May 27, 2016, noting the scope of its then-planned analysis and the limitations on such a response given the timing and available data resources.
The EBA found that all but five Member States allow for waivers in the areas of remuneration, that most Member States permit the application of waivers through thresholds based on balance total or by making case-by-case assessments. The EBA concluded that the extent to which banks and identified staff benefit from waivers differs significantly across the EU.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
2016 List of G-SIBs Published
11/21/2016
The Financial Stability Board published an updated list of global systemically important banks. The 2016 list of G-SIBs includes the same banks as those in the 2015 list. However, some banks have moved to a higher or lower bucket due to improved data quality, changes in underlying activity and/or the use of supervisory judgement.
View the 2016 list of G-SIBs.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Announces Broadened Post-Employment Restrictions on Senior Examiners and Officers
11/18/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it was broadening the scope of post-employment restrictions applicable to senior examiners and officers of Federal Reserve Banks. The revised rule broadens the one-year bar on accepting paid work from a financial institution from applying to only examiners who are “central points of contacts” (CPCs) to include deputy CPCs, senior supervisory officers (SSOs), deputy SSOs, enterprise risk officers and supervisory team leaders. The new policy also prohibits former Federal Reserve Bank officers from representing third parties before current Federal Reserve employees for one year after leaving their position, and imposes a one-year ban on current employees discussing official business with these former officers.
The restriction on former officers became effective on December 5, 2016, and the restriction on senior examiner employment will become effective on January 2, 2017.
View press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Harmonizes Approach to Credit Risk for Exposures to Public Sector Entities
11/18/2016
The European Banking Authority published a list of public sector entities that may be treated as regional governments, local authorities or central governments when firms are calculating their capital requirements to EU public sector entities for credit risk purposes under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Exposures to the public sector entities that are included in the EBA's list will attract the same risk weight as the respective regional governments, local authorities or central governments. The EBA has compiled the list on its own initiative to enhance harmonization across the EU in this area.
View the EBA's list.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Representative Hensarling Calls for Repeal of Dodd-Frank
11/16/2016
Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, gave a speech to the Exchequer Club laying out a potential financial regulatory agenda for the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans to pursue. He began by calling for thwarting the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, as well as preventing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from regulating small dollar, “payday” loans.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Proposals to Reintroduce the Maturity Ladder for Liquidity Reporting
11/16/2016
The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft amending Implementing Technical Standards to amend the current ITS on supervisory reporting of firms as amended by the ITS on additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation, banks are subject to liquidity reporting requirements. The ITS on supervisory reporting include provisions on a firm's liquidity reporting requirements. Additional monitoring metrics for liquidity were added to the ITS in March 2016. The EBA's final draft ITS on those additional monitoring metrics included a maturity ladder templates and instructions which were removed by the European Commission before it adopted the ITS. The European Commission has since requested the EBA to update the maturity ladder in line with the detailed information of liquid assets as set out in the Delegated Act on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. The EBA's proposed amending ITS are mostly concerned with reintroducing a maturity ladder in line with the reporting requirements provided for in the LCR Delegated Act. The EBA is due to submit the final revised draft ITS in March/April 2017. It is expected that the revised reporting requirements would apply from March 2018. The consultation closes on January 2, 2016.
View the consultation paper.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Government Accountability Office Reports on Limitations in Federal Reserve Stress Tests
11/15/2016
The Government Accountability Office released a report highlighting limitations in the Federal Reserve stress testing programs. The GAO report noted three specific areas that could hinder the effectiveness of stress tests: qualitative assessment disclosure and communication, scenario design and model risk management. Specifically, the GAO faulted the Federal Reserve for not disclosing full information on its qualitative assessment approach, posing challenges to companies that must meet assessment goals and for not analyzing whether the severe scenario used for stress testing adequately reflects a full range of possible outcomes in the event of a crisis. The GAO report makes 15 specific recommendations, which it reported that the Federal Reserve “generally agreed” with and noted specific ongoing and future efforts to implement these recommendations.
View GAO press release.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Board Approves Final Rule Establishing Recordkeeping Requirements for Deposit Accounts by Large Insured Institutions
11/15/2016
The Board of the FDIC approved a final rule establishing recordkeeping requirements for FDIC-insured institutions with more than two million deposit accounts. Such institutions are required to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor and to implement information technology systems capable of calculating the amount of insured money for depositors within 24 hours of a failure. The final rule also established alternative requirements for certain deposit accounts with “pass through” deposit insurance coverage, including trust and brokered deposits, allowing for institutions to process these accounts during a longer time period after a failure. The rule will become effective on April 1, 2017.
View FDIC press release.
View final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Guidelines on the Assessment of Institutional Protection Schemes Published
11/15/2016
Guidelines laying down principles for the coordination of the assessment and monitoring by the European Central Bank and regulators of institutional protection schemes pursuant to the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Guidelines are applicable to Single Supervisory Mechanism regulators, which includes the ECB and regulators of the participating states. The Guidelines relate to the assessment of IPSs for the purpose of granting prudential permissions and waivers to IPS members pursuant to the CRR and to the monitoring of IPSs that have been recognized for prudential purposes. The Guidelines apply where member institutions simultaneously submit their application for prudential waivers. An IPS is a contractual or statutory liability arrangement that protects its member institutions and ensures that they have the liquidity and solvency needed to avoid bankruptcy where necessary. The CRR requires that regulators must approve and monitor the adequacy of the IPS’s systems for the monitoring and classification of risk and further requires that the IPS conducts its own review. Regulators may allow for certain derogations by an IPS member from certain CRR requirements. The Guidelines outline the process for regulators in making decisions relating to members of the same IPS that consist of both significant and less significant credit institutions. The purpose of the Guidelines is to ensure that regulators apply the same criteria when assessing IPS applications from less significant institutions and consistently monitor ongoing legal requirements. SSM regulators must comply with the Guidelines by December 2, 2016.
View the Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Draft Guidance on Fit and Proper Assessment
11/14/2016
The European Central Bank published for consultation draft Guidance on the fit and proper assessment of members of management bodies of significant banks. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The purpose of the draft Guidance is to outline how the ECB will evaluate the qualifications, skills and proper standing of a candidate for becoming a member of a management body. The draft Guidance builds on the current draft guidance under the Capital Requirements Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive published by the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Banking Authority on October 28, 2016. The assessment criteria for the fitness and proprietary of members of the management body are outlined in the draft Guidance. The criteria include experience, reputation, conflicts of interest and independence of mind, time commitment and collective suitability. The draft Guidance provides information on the purpose, scope and type of interviews conducted by the ECB of appointees. The draft Guidance highlights how a decision is taken by the ECB after every fit and proper assessment and the various types of decisions that may be taken. The draft Guidance also notes that under the SSM Regulation, the ECB has the power to remove, at any time, members from the management body of a significant supervised entity who do not fulfill the fit and proper requirements, which is provided for in the SSM Regulation. The ECB is seeking feedback on its draft Guidance by January 20, 2017.
View the draft Guidance. -
Proposed Revisions to EU Supervisory Reporting Requirements for Sovereign Exposures and Operational Risk
11/14/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper proposing revisions to the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting.The ITS on supervisory reporting collate the prudential reporting requirements of banks under the Capital Requirements Regulation, related technical standards and other financial information required by national regulators. The ITS on supervisory reporting are updated when prudential or supervisory requirements change. The EBA is proposing to revise the ITS in relation to supervisory reporting in order to address weaknesses in the existing supervisory reporting requirements concerning sovereign exposures. The EBA has identified areas where additional information or gaps should be filled. In addition, the EBA is proposing to amend the ITS on supervisory reporting in relation to operational risk so that national regulators can more closely monitor losses due to operational risk events and analyze the drivers behind those events that lead to material losses, in particular for larger banks.
The EBA intends to submit the final draft revised ITS to the European Commission in March or April 2017. The revised reporting requirements are expected to apply from March 1, 2018. Responses to the consultation are requested by January 7, 2017.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Proposed Guidelines on the Application of the IRB Approach
11/14/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on proposed Guidelines on the application of the Internal Ratings-Based approach, in particular, the estimation of risk parameters for non-defaulted exposures, namely of the probability of default (PD) and the loss given default (LGD), and on the treatment of defaulted assets. The draft Guidelines focus on the definitions and modelling techniques used in the estimation of risk parameters for both non-defaulted and defaulted exposures. The Guidelines aim to address concerns raised over the lack of comparability of capital requirements determined under the IRB approach across firms which the EBA raised in its Opinion and Report on the implementation of the regulatory review of the IRB approach to calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, published in February 2016.
Responses to the consultation are due by February 10, 2017. The EBA is proposing that the Guidelines would apply from the end of 2020 due to the numerous changes to rating systems that the Guidelines would involve.
View the consultation paper.
View the EBA's Opinion and Report on the implementation of the IRB approach.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Makes Public Statement on Implementing IFRS 9
11/10/2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority issued a public Statement on the implementation of IFRS 9. The purpose of the Statement is to promote consistent application of European securities and markets legislation, and more specifically, International Financial Reporting Standards. ESMA notes that issuers of securities admitted to trading on regulated markets and their auditors should take the public statement into consideration during the implementation of IFRS 9; in particular, when disclosing and auditing its effects on such financial statements. ESMA is of the view that in most cases it would be appropriate to provide disclosures about changes in accounting policies and impacts on an entity’s financial statements in the period of initial application already prior to the entity’s 2017 annual financial reports. ESMA highlights that IFRS 9 is expected to have significant impacts on firms and, in particular, on credit institutions, due to the new classification for financial assets as well as implementation of the new impairment model based on the ECL. ESMA's Statement provides an illustrative timeline for implementation and a non-exhaustive list of good practices of disclosure when issuers (in general, and not limited to financial institutions) expect the application of IFRS 9 to have a significant impact on their financial statements. ESMA notes that each individual issuer should take into account materiality and its individual circumstances to ensure that relevant and transparent financial information is provided to users of its financial statements.
View ESMA’s Statement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Views From Impact Assessment on Implementation of IFRS 9
11/10/2016
The European Banking Authority published a Report outlining observations from its impact assessment on the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9. The report analyzes the estimated impact of implementing IFRS 9 on firms and assesses the interaction between IFRS 9 and other prudential requirements. The impact assessment was launched in January 2016 on a sample of approximately 50 firms. The implementation efforts by firms (such as the development of processes, systems and models) are ongoing and the EBA expects that implementation measures will continue to evolve until at least the initial application of IFRS 9 from January 1, 2018. The EBA highlights that smaller banks are lagging in preparation compared to larger banks and notes that firms should not underestimate the work required to implement IFRS 9. The EBA is proposing further steps to assist in monitoring the implementation of IFRS 9, including a second exercise on the impact of IFRS 9, ongoing dialogue on the implementation issues outlined in the Report through engagement with the EBA, firms and auditors and considering additional regulatory guidance on the interaction between existing prudential requirements and the applicable accounting framework, including any guidance on transitional arrangements for the application of revised accounting frameworks and clarifications regarding the current regulatory technical standards for specifying specific credit risk adjustments and general credit risk adjustments.
View the Report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Confirms MREL Buffer and Threshold Conditions Policy
11/08/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published its final Supervisory Statement on the relationship between a firm's Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) and capital and leverage buffers as well as the relationship between MREL and the PRA's Threshold Conditions which are a set of minimum requirements that authorized firms must meet in order to continue carrying out their regulated activities. The PRA also provided feedback on the responses to its consultation on its proposed approach. The PRA is maintaining its proposed approach without any substantive changes but has amended the Supervisory Statement to provide clarity to firms. The PRA's approach is to prohibit firms from being able to double-count common equity Tier 1 capital towards MREL and to risk-weighted capital and leverage buffers. Some guidance has been given on enforcement: when a firm is in breach of its MREL requirements, the PRA may investigate whether that firm is failing or likely to fail to meet the Threshold Conditions, although investigation will not be automatic. The PRA's Supervisory Statement should be read in conjunction with the Bank of England's policy documents on setting MREL. The PRA will apply the MREL buffer and Threshold Conditions policies in line with the interim and end-state MREL dates set by the BoE. A firm that cannot meet its MREL requirement should notify the PRA promptly.
View the PRA's Policy Statement on buffers and capital requirements for MREL.
View the PRA's Supervisory Statement on buffers and capital requirements for MREL. -
UK Bank of England Finalizes MREL Requirements
11/08/2016
The Bank of England published the final rules on implementing the EU Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL). This is the equivalent of the US Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (known as TLAC) rule. Under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and related UK legislation, the BoE is responsible for directing relevant firms to maintain MREL. MREL is a minimum requirement for firms to maintain equity and eligible debt liabilities that can bear losses before and in resolution and results in a top up to standard regulatory capital requirements, similar in concept to the old Tier 3 requirements under Basel II. The requirement will apply to UK authorized banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, parent undertakings of those firms that are financial holding companies and to UK authorized subsidiaries of such firms.
Read more. -
European Banking Authority Consults on Bank Authorization Application Information Requirements
11/08/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on proposed technical standards on the information to be provided by applicant banks to national regulators in support of their applications for authorization. The Capital Requirements Directive requires a bank to obtain authorization before it begins its operations. Member states set out the requirements for the authorization in their country which means that different standards apply across the EU. At the moment, national regulators stipulate the information required to be submitted in support of a bank's application for authorization and the requirements around the application process. CRD IV requires the EBA to prepare Regulatory Technical Standards setting out the information to be provided in support of an application for bank authorization, requirements applicable to shareholders and qualifying holdings and obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory powers by a national regulator. The EBA is also required to prepare Implementing Technical Standards setting out the forms, templates and procedures relating to an authorization application. Once the RTS and ITS enter into force, the requirements will be directly applicable across the EU, largely replacing the existing national regimes on information requirements for authorization applications. However, the proposed RTS do allow some flexibility for national regulators to require additional information from an applicant and provide that information is not required where a national regulator has waived a certain authorization requirement for a particular applicant bank. The EBA is proposing that an application for authorization includes, amongst other things, information on a bank's identification and history, own funds, the proposed activities the bank intends to carry out, shareholders and close links, organizational structure and internal audit policies and infrastructure.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US OCC Launches Web System for Banks to File Licensing and Certain Applications and Notices
11/07/2016
The US OCC announced that it will launch a web-based system for banks to file licensing and public welfare investment applications and notices early next year. The Central Application Tracking System will allow OCC-supervised institutions to draft, submit and track applications and notices online. The system also will allow OCC staff to receive, process and manage those submissions online. The first phase of the system’s rollout will start on January 17, 2017, with the second and third phases set to begin that spring. The new system will replace the current OCC systems, e-Corp and CD-1 Invest. Before the phase 1 rollout, the OCC will provide webinars and resources to explain registration and use of the new system.
View the OCC press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Report on the Implications of Implementing Basel Frameworks for Counterparty Credit Risk and Market Risk Published
11/04/2016
The European Banking Authority published a Report on the impact of the adoption into EU legislation of the new international frameworks for counterparty credit risk and market risk. The EBA Report responds to Calls for Advice from the European Commission received in April 2016, as part of the Commission's review of the Capital Requirements Regulation.
As part of its review, the Commission is considering the impact of implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's framework for market risk, known as the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB), published in January 2016 and the new standardized approach for the calculation of the exposure value of derivatives, known as SA-CCR, published in March 2014. The Commission asked the EBA to provide technical advice assessing the impact for EU banks resulting from the adoption of the Basel Committee's framework on market risk and whether any adjustments to that framework would be appropriate. The EBA was also asked for advice on the impact of implementing the SA-CCR, including the proportionate application of SA-CCR to smaller firms.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Aims to Harmonize Approach to Options and Discretions for All Banks within the Single Supervisory Mechanism
11/03/2016
The European Central Bank launched a consultation on proposals to harmonize how Euro member state national regulators of less significant banks exercise the options and discretions available to them under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. The ECB has already harmonized the application of options and discretions for the banks that it directly prudentially supervises under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB considers that it is appropriate to develop a harmonized approach of supervision for all banks within the SSM, to ensure the smooth functioning of the whole euro area banking system. To do so, the ECB is intending to adopt a Guideline, which would be legally binding, and a Recommendation, which would not be legally binding. The options and discretions relate to own funds requirements, capital requirements, large exposures, liquidity and transitional provisions. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017.
View the proposed Guideline.
View the proposed Recommendation.
View further information about the ECB's proposals.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Presents Proposed Design of a New Prudential Regime for Investment Firms
11/03/2016
The European Banking Authority published a discussion paper on the design for a new framework for applying prudential standards to non-bank investment firms that are not deemed to be systemically important. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate. It recommended that a separate prudential regime should be established for these investment firms. The Commission issued a second CfA in June 2016, asking for advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them. The EBA published an Opinion on the criteria aspect of the CfA on October 20, 2016.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Guidelines on Internal Governance
10/28/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on draft revised Guidelines on internal governance for credit institutions and investment firms. The EU Capital Requirements Directive imposes governance requirements on banks and investment firms which include, amongst other things, requirements to have robust governance arrangements, to establish a risk committee and nomination committee and to have adequate risk management processes and internal controls. CRD requires the EBA to develop Guidelines on internal governance. The proposed new Guidelines set out the internal governance arrangements, processes and mechanisms that firms must implement to ensure effective management of the firm. The Guidelines will apply to a firm's governance arrangements, including their organizational structure and processes to identify, manage, monitor and report risks that they may be exposed to, taking into account the three lines of defense model. The EBA's current Guidelines on internal governance, published on September 27, 2011, will be repealed when the new Guidelines enter into force. Responses to the consultation are due by January 28, 2017.
View the consultation paper and proposed revised Guidelines.
View the current Guidelines. -
EU Consultation on Assessing the Suitability of Management
10/28/2016
The European Banking Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority launched a joint consultation on proposed Guidelines on the Assessment of the Suitability of the Members of Management Body and Key Function Holders. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Capital Requirements Directive require firms to assess the suitability of members of their management body. Firms subject to CRD must all assess the suitability of all key function holders that have a significant influence over the direction of the firm. The proposed Guidelines provide criteria for assessing the individual and collective knowledge, skills, experience, reputation, honesty, integrity and independence of members of the management body. The proposed Guidelines also include a framework for assessing whether individual members of management commit sufficient time to performing their duties, set out how diversity should be taken into account in the selection process for members of the management body and provide for appropriate financial and human resources to be allocated to induction and training.
View the consultation paper. -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Announces Annual Indexing of 2017 Reserve Requirement Exemption Amount and of Low Reserve Tranche
10/27/2016
The US Board of Governors of the FRS announced the annual indexing of reserve requirement exemption amount and low reserve tranche, two amounts used in determining reserve requirements of depository institutions under Regulation D.
All depository institutions must hold a percentage of certain types of deposits as reserves in the form of vault cash, as a deposit in a Federal Reserve Bank or as a deposit in a pass-through account at a correspondent institution. Reserve requirements currently are assessed on the depository institution’s net transaction accounts (mostly checking accounts). Depository institutions must also regularly submit reports of their deposits and other reservable liabilities.
For net transaction accounts in 2017, the first $15.5 million, up from $15.2 million in 2016, will be exempt from reserve requirements. A three percent reserve ratio will be assessed on net transaction accounts over $15.5 million up to and including $115.1 million, up from $110.2 million in 2016. A ten percent reserve ratio will be assessed on net transaction accounts in excess of $115.1 million.
The new low reserve tranche and reserve requirement exemption amount will apply to the 14-day reserve maintenance period that begins January 19, 2017. The Federal Reserve Board also announced changes in two other amounts, the nonexempt deposit cutoff level and the reduced reporting limit, that are used to determine the frequency with which depository institutions must submit deposit reports.
View the Federal Reserve Board final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Votes to Affirm the Countercyclical Capital Buffer at Current Zero Percent Level
10/24/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it had voted to affirm the countercyclical capital buffer at the current level of zero percent. The release notes that the CCyB is a macroprudential tool that can be used to raise capital requirements on internationally active banking organizations when such organizations are exposed to an elevated risk of above-normal future losses. In such circumstances, the CCyB would be available to help banking organizations absorb higher losses and to moderate credit supply fluctuations.
The Federal Reserve Board’s release noted that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the OCC were consulted before the Federal Reserve Board voted on this decision. Should the Federal Reserve Board in the future modify the CCyB amount, banking organizations would have twelve months before an increase becomes effective unless the Federal Reserve Board decides on an earlier effective date.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Responds to Commission Call for Advice on Large Exposure Framework
10/24/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report outlining its response to the Commission's call for advice, published on April 26, 2016, on the review of the large exposures framework laid down in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Commission is considering whether to implement the agreed Basel Committee on Banking Supervision framework for measuring and controlling large exposures by modifying the CRR through a legislative proposal before the end of 2016. The EBA's Report analyzes the impact of aligning certain aspects of the large exposures framework pursuant to the CRR.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Draft EU Technical Standards on MREL Reporting
10/24/2016
The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting requirements of the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities. The ITS set out the procedures and templates for the identification and transmission of information by resolution authorities to the EBA on the MREL that has been set for each firm. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive requires national resolution authorities to set individual levels of MREL for each firm. MREL is the EU equivalent of US Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). The consultation closes on November 21, 2016.
View the consultation paper. -
EU Recommendations on the Appropriateness of the Prudential Regime for Investment Firms
10/20/2016
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the criteria for identifying investment firms to which the EU regulatory capital requirements legislation should apply. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate. It recommended that a separate prudential regime should be established for these investment firms. The Commission issued a second Call for Advice in June 2016, asking for advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Grants Relief from Certain US Risk Committee Requirements Applicable to Foreign Banking Organizations under Regulation YY
10/19/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board issued letters to two banks, granting relief from certain US risk committee requirements under Regulation YY in light of certain home country corporate governance requirements and practices of the banks involved. Regulation YY requires foreign banking organizations with combined US assets of more than $50 billion but US non-branch assets of less than $50 billion to establish a US risk committee as a committee of the global board of directors, on a standalone basis, or as a joint committee with its enterprise-wide risk committee. One member of the committee must not be an officer or employee of the company or its affiliates (or an immediate family member of a person who is an executive officer of the company or its affiliates).
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Guidelines on Corrections to Duration for Debt Instruments under Capital Requirements Regulation
10/14/2016
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on the correction required for the calculation of Modified Duration for debt instruments subject to prepayment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes two methods to calculate capital requirements for general interest rate risk. The relevant methods are the Maturity-Based calculation and the Duration-Based calculation of general risk. The final Guidelines apply to the Duration-Based calculation. The Duration-Based calculation uses the concept of Modified Duration pursuant to the formulae outlined in the CRR. This method is only valid for instruments that are not subject to repayment risk. The EBA has is mandated to issue guidelines establishing how to correct the Modified Duration calculation to reflect prepayment risk. The EBA has proposed two approaches to correct the calculation. One option is to treat the debt instrument with prepayment risk as if it is a combination of a plain vanilla bond and an embedded option. The Modified Duration of the plain vanilla bond is therefore corrected with the change in value of the embedded option; which is estimated according to its theoretical delta, resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The other option is directly to calculate the change in value of the whole instrument subject to a repayment risk resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The Guidelines will apply from March 1, 2017.
View the final Guidelines.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Publishes Final Guidelines on Remuneration Practices
10/14/2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority published two sets of final Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies under the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities Directive and the Alternative Investment Funds Management Directive. The Guidelines follow ESMA’s final report that was published in March of this year.
The UCITS Sound Remuneration Guidelines will apply to management companies, including those that are subsidiaries of credit institutions subject to sector-specific remuneration principles, and investment companies that have not designated a management company authorized under the UCITS Directive. The Guidelines set out the obligations of the management company to manage its financial situation and the governance of remuneration (which includes issues such as the design, approval and oversight of the remuneration policy) and outline the requirements for establishing and applying remuneration policies and practices for management companies and their identified staff, specifying the categories of identified staff.
Read more. -
International Standard for TLAC Holdings Published
10/12/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the final Standard for Total Loss Absorbing Capacity holdings. The Financial Stability Board published the TLAC requirements for global systemically important banks in November 2015, which set a minimum requirement for TLAC for G-SIBs, including a Term Sheet implementing the requirements. The Term Sheet states that G-SIBs must deduct, from their own TLAC or regulatory capital, exposures to TLAC instruments and liabilities issued by other G-SIBs and calls on the Basel Committee to further specify these requirements. The Basel Committee consulted in November 2015 on the proposed treatment of TLAC holdings in G-SIBs.
The TLAC holdings standard will require banks to deduct holdings of TLAC instruments that are not already included in regulatory capital from their own Tier 2 capital, subject to the thresholds that apply to existing holdings of regulatory capital and an additional 5 per cent threshold for non-regulatory-capital TLAC holdings only. In addition, instruments that are ranked at the same level as subordinated forms of TLAC must also be deducted.
The TLAC holdings standard will apply to G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs from January 1, 2019 for investments in
most G-SIBs which is the same time that the TLAC requirements apply. The TLAC holdings standard will apply later for G-SIBs headquartered in emerging market economies.
View the final Standard.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards on Mapping Credit Assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for Securitization Positions
10/12/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation containing Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR permits the risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approaches for securitization positions to be determined, if applicable, based on the credit quality of the positions. This credit quality is determined by reference to credit ratings issued or endorsed by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation). The ITS determine the mapping between credit ratings and the credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights set out in the CRR for securitization positions. The ITS enter into force from November 1, 2016.
View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for securitizations.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards on Mapping Credit Assessments by Credit Rating Agencies Published
10/12/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation containing the Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR requires the credit ratings scales used by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation) to be mapped to the risk weights categories in the CRR.
The European Commission has adopted ITS that amended the final draft ITS submitted by the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority). This is despite the ESAs rejecting the Commission's proposed amendments in an Opinion published in May 2016.
The ITS aim to ensure sound credit assessments to encourage financial stability in the EU and determine an objective approach for attributing risk weights to assessments carried out by ECAIs.
View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for credit risk.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Regulatory Treatment of Accounting Provisions
10/11/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation paper and discussion paper on the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions under the Basel III capital framework and related policy considerations. The International Accounting Standards Board and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board have adopted new provisioning standards that require the use of expected credit loss models rather than incurred loss models - the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 and the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL), respectively. These standards modify provisioning standards to incorporate forward-looking assessments in the estimation of credit loss. The new IASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2018, although earlier application is permitted. The new FASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2020 for certain banks that are public companies and from 2020 for all other banks, although early application by all banks is permitted from 2019. The Basel Committee is considering the implications of new ECL models for regulatory capital because the new models will result in fundamental changes to the provisioning practices of banks. The consultation paper sets out the current regulatory treatment of provisions as well as the Basel Committee’s proposal to retain, for an interim period, the current regulatory treatment of provisions under the standardized and the internal ratings-based approaches. In particular, the Committee is proposing that, in the interim period, jurisdictions would extend their existing approaches to categorizing provisions as general provisions (GP) and specific provisions (SP) to provisions measured under the applicable ECL accounting model.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Report and Standardized Templates for Additional Tier 1 Instruments
10/10/2016
The European Banking Authority published an updated Report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 instruments and standardized templates for AT1 instruments. This follows a consultation in July 2016. The Capital Requirements Regulation sets out the eligibility criteria for AT1 instruments, which are further detailed in Regulatory Technical Standards. The CRR requires the EBA to review the quality of own funds instruments issued by banks across the EU. The Report sets out the results of its monitoring the issuances of AT1 capital instruments, assessing the terms and conditions of selected issuances against the criteria provided for in CRR and the related RTS. The Report is based on the review of 33 AT1 issuances from EU banks, which took place between August 2013 and December 2015, for a total amount of EUR 35.5 billion. The Report sets out detailed analysis of some of the clauses reviewed, including the EBA's views on those clauses, and interpretation of some of the CRR provisions, in particular the provisions relating to triggers.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Draft Guidance on Information and Communication Technology Risk
10/06/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on the proposed Guidelines for the assessment of Information and Communication Technology risk under the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. The increasing complexity of ICT risk in the banking industry and the increasing potential adverse prudential impact such risks pose to individual firms and on the sector as a whole has led the EBA to propose the Guidelines. The purpose of the proposed Guidelines is to promote common procedures and methodologies for regulators throughout the EU when they are conducting supervisory assessments of a firm's governance and strategy on ICT and a firm's exposures and controls, as required by the Capital Requirements Directive. National regulators should apply the Guidelines to their assessment of firms proportionately, as set out in the EBA SREP guidelines. The proposed Guidelines should be read alongside the EBA SREP Guidelines. Responses to the consultation are due by January 6, 2017.
View the draft Guidelines.
View the EBA SREP Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Date of UK Stress Test Results Announced
10/03/2016
The Bank of England announced that the results of the UK 2016 banking stress test would be reported to the relevant firms involved on November 29, 2016 and published on November 30, 2016. The 2016 test is the first to be designed under the new approach to stress testing published in October 2015 and covers seven UK banks and building societies: Barclays plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Nationwide Building Society, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, Santander UK plc and Standard Chartered plc.
The Bank also announced that for the first time the UK stress test next year will include two scenarios: the annual cyclical scenario, which assesses the risks to the banking system resulting from the financial cycle, and an additional "exploratory" scenario which assesses a bank's resilience to a wider range of potential threats.
View the announcement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Guidelines on Implicit Support for Securitization Transactions
10/03/2016
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Examples of such transactions include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR places restrictions on providing implicit support to securitizations. These rules apply in addition to the so-called "skin in the game" requirements on originators to retain part of the risk on securitizations. To prevent uncapitalized risks of implicit support, the CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR also states that a transaction is not considered to provide support to a securitization if it is executed under arm’s length conditions and taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The CRR requires a sponsor or originator institution that has failed to comply with this requirement to, at a minimum, hold own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized. The Guidelines set out an objective test in relation to the definition of arm's length conditions.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Finalizes Standards for Underwriting Buy-to-Let Mortgages
09/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement and Supervisory Statement setting out its final policy approach to underwriting standards for buy-to-let mortgage contracts. The Supervisory Statement sets out the minimum standards that firms should use to underwrite buy-to-let mortgage contracts, including minimum requirements for affordability assessments. It also clarifies that the PRA's expectation is that the reduction of capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation for loans to small and medium-sized enterprises should not be applied where the purpose of the loan is to fund a buy-to-let business. The standards will apply to all PRA-regulated firms undertaking buy-to-let lending that are not subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. The PRA expects firms within scope to ensure that the standards are adopted by other firms within their groups that undertake buy-to-let lending.
The new standards will need to be implemented by relevant firms by January 1, 2017 for the interest cover ratio tests and interest rate affordability stress tests. The remaining standards will need to be implemented by September 30, 2017.
View the Policy Statement.
View the Supervisory Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Legislation Amending Technical Standards for Reporting of Financial Information to Regulators Published
09/29/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation amending Regulatory Technical Standards on the reporting of financial information under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS lay down uniform requirements in relation to supervisory reporting to regulators, pursuant to the Capital Requirements Regulation, in the following areas: (i) own funds requirements and financial information; (ii) losses stemming from lending collateralized by immovable property; (iii) large exposures; (iv) leverage ratio; and (v) Liquidity Coverage requirements and Net Stable Funding Requirements. The amending Regulation amends the definitions, templates, and instructions used for the purposes of supervisory reporting. The amending Regulation is based on draft RTS submitted by the European Banking Authority in March 2016. The amending Regulation will enter into force on October 19, 2016 and will apply from December 1, 2016 with the first reporting date being December 31, 2016.
View the amending Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Guidelines on Application of Definition of Default
09/28/2016
The European Banking Authority published the final Guidelines specifying the application of the definition of default in relation to the Internal Ratings Based Approach and the Standardized Approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR sets out the definition of default of an obligor that is used for the purposes of the IRB and Standardized Approaches. The purpose of the Guidelines is to harmonize the definition of default across the EU framework so that EU banks apply regulatory requirements to their capital positions in a more consistent and comparable way, especially in the context of IRB models. The Guidelines expand on various aspects of the application of the definition of default including the “days past due” criterion for default identification, indications of unlikeliness to pay, specific aspects of the application of the definition of default for retail exposures, application of the default definition in a banking group, treatment of external data and criteria for a return to non-defaulted status.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Releases Proposed Rule to Modify Capital Plan and Stress Testing Rules
09/26/2016
The US BoG of the Federal Reserve System issued a proposed rule modifying the capital plan and stress testing rules for the 2017 test cycle. The proposed changes include eliminating the qualitative portion of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review for certain large and noncomplex firms (generally, firms with less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets), along with reduction in the amount of data that such firms are required to submit on the FR Y-14 regulatory reports. Such institutions however, would remain subject to quantitative CCAR requirements and to normal supervision by Federal Reserve Board regarding their capital planning. The proposed rule would be effective for the 2017 CCAR. Comments on the proposal are due by November 25, 2016.
In a speech given the same day, FRB Governor Tarullo stated that the Federal Reserve Board is considering adoption of a “stress capital buffer approach” to setting post-stress capital requirements whereby the G-SIB capital surcharge would be factored into the estimate of the amount of capital required under stress. However, Governor Tarullo emphasized that this was a preliminary proposal and would not apply to the 2017 cycle of CCAR.
View proposal.
View Govenor Tarullo speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Policy Committee Maintains Countercyclical Buffer Rate
09/22/2016
The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England released a statement following its meeting on September 20, 2016. The FPC considers that the current outlook for financial stability in the UK remains challenging following the outcome of the referendum in June for the UK to leave the EU. The FPC has reaffirmed that it expects to maintain a countercyclical buffer rate of 0% until at least June 2017 unless any material changes warrant an amendment. The Prudential Regulation Authority's expectation is that banks should not increase dividends and other distributions as a result of the CCyB being maintained at 0%.
View the statement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Final Draft Technical Standards on the Exchange of Information between Regulators Regarding Qualify Holdings
09/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the common procedures, forms and templates for the consultation process between the relevant national regulators when carrying out the prudential assessment relating to proposed acquisitions of qualifying holdings in credit institutions. The Capital Requirements Directive requires regulators to fully consult with each other when carrying out the assessment of a proposed acquirer of qualifying holdings. The final draft ITS supplements this requirement by setting out the requirements for the designation of contact points by regulators, as well as a timeframe and process for submitting the consultation notice and for providing the response. The final draft ITS provide templates for the response from the regulator from whom information has been requested. It also outlines language requirements and means of communication, as well as how mutual feedback would be carried out. The EBA has made certain amendments to the version of the ITS that it consulted on previously to take into account the final draft ITS prepared on a similar topic under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, which was published by the European Securities and Markets Authority in March 2015. Those amendments seek to align the requirements across sectors. The final draft ITS must be submitted to the Commission for adoption before it can enter into force.
View the final draft ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Minimum Amount of Professional Indemnity Insurance for Authorization under the Revised EU Payment Services Directive
09/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper proposing draft Guidelines on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of professional indemnity insurance required for authorization under the Payment Services Directive II. PSD2 entered into force on January 12, 2016, and will apply from January 13, 2018. The PSD2 recognizes new types of payment services that have emerged in the area of internet payments, such as payment initiation services and account information services. The PSD2 sets out the criteria on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of professional indemnity insurance or other comparable guarantee to be held by regulated firms. The draft Guidelines also set out the criteria, indicators, calculation methods and a formula that regulators should use when granting authorization or registration. The consultation paper explains the EBA's proposal for the use of a formula to calculate the minimum monetary amount of professional indemnity insurance or any comparable guarantee, when and how the lowest tier (the default value) should be used when calculating the monetary amount, provides details on indicators for the criteria set out in the PSD2 and the proposed methodology for some of the indicators. Responses to the consultation are due by November 30, 2016.
View the consultation page.
-
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Updates Deposit Insurance Fund Figures
09/20/2016
FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg issued a statement on the release of updated data regarding the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund. (DIF) The DIF balance stood at almost $78 billion, leading to a reserve ratio of 1.17%, an eight-year high. Chairman Gruenberg’s statement noted that the FDIC still intends to reach the statutory minimum ratio of 1.35% set forth in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, before September 30, 2020.
View text of Chairman Gruenberg’s statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Publishes Semi-Annual Update of Global Capital Index
09/20/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation released the semi-annual report of the Global Capital Index. In a concurrent statement, Vice-Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig noted that while Global Systemically Important Banks did increase their equity capital, a beyond-proportionate increase in assets led to a net increase in the overall leverage of G-SIBs. Vice-Chairman Hoenig also noted that asset quality in Europe remains an issue in comparison to the United States, with more than three times as many non-performing loans, and that better-capitalized banks trade at a premium when compared to banks with weaker capital positions. Vice-Chairman Hoenig noted that, while banks are better capitalized now, with average leverage ratios of around 5%, such ratio remains inadequate should banks have to withstand losses similar to the last financial crisis.
View text of Vice-Chairman Hoenig’s statement.
View Global Capital Index.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Discusses the Condition of the US Federal Banking System
09/15/2016
The Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry addressed how the US federal banking system has progressed since the Great Recession and the 2008 financial crisis, the strength of US banks today and the need for continued vigilance to manage risks. Among other things, the Comptroller discussed leverage ratios and their role as an additional line of defense, or backstop, to the risk-based capital measures. Curry criticized the proposals of some to “water down” the ratios by manipulating what is included or excluded from consideration and stressed the need for clear definitions that accurately and transparently capture the leverage of regulated banks. Curry argued that “weakening the ratio through special exclusions only undermines our original intent and weakens the protection against excessive leverage.” He further noted that while some wish to exclude certain assets from measures of leverage on the grounds that it could affect certain business lines’ profitability, “the essence of assessing a bank’s leverage is about comparing its equity to its assets, and carving out various assets would cut against the very meaning of leverage.”
View the Comptroller's full remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Bank Supervision Operating Plan for Fiscal Year 2017
09/14/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released its bank supervision operating plan for fiscal year (FY) 2017. The plan sets forth the foundation for policy initiatives and for supervisory strategies applicable to individual banks. OCC staff members will use this plan to guide their supervisory priorities, planning and resource allocations.
Of note, the agency indicated that it will focus on Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering compliance management in 2017. Additional supervisory strategies for FY 2017 will focus on: (i) commercial and retail loan underwriting; (ii) business model sustainability and viability; (iii) operational resiliency; and (iv) change management processes to address new regulatory requirements.
The OCC will provide periodic updates about supervisory priorities through the Semiannual Risk Perspective in the spring and fall of 2017, and with a mid-cycle operating plan status report in the third quarter of FY 2017.
View the OCC's Fiscal Year 2017 Operating Plan.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Proposes Framework for Receiverships for Uninsured Federally Chartered National Banks
09/13/2016
The OCC issued a proposed rule setting forth a framework for placing uninsured national banks regulated by the OCC into receivership. While the National Bank Act and Federal Deposit Insurance Act specify the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for insured banks and savings associations, the law grants the Comptroller of the Currency broad authority to choose a receiver for uninsured national banks. The proposal would not apply to federal savings associations, all of which are insured, or to uninsured US branch offices of foreign banks.
The proposed rule describes: (i) the appointment of a receiver and required federal notice; (ii) the process for submitting claims against the receivership; (iii) the order of priorities for payment of administrative expenses and claims; (iv) the powers and duties of the receiver; (v) the payment of dividends on claims; (vi) the sources of funds for payments and claims; and (vii) the status of fiduciary and custodial assets and accounts.
While the OCC has not appointed a receiver for an uninsured national bank in many years, the agency believes that clarifying the framework, process and authority promotes the orderly resolution of such institutions if required and contributes to the broader stability of the federal banking system.
All uninsured national banks are currently trust banks. However, the OCC noted that it retains discretion to grant new charters for uninsured banks, and the OCC specifically stated that an uninsured federal bank charter may be an appropriate entity for delivering banking procedures in a new way in light of technological innovations in financial services.
The deadline to submit comments on the proposed rule is November 14, 2016.
View the proposed rule.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Legislation on Indices and Recognized Exchanges under the Capital Requirements Regulation
09/13/2016
Implementing Technical Standards listing the main indices and recognized exchanges for the use of eligible collateral in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The CRR states that equities or convertible bonds included in a main index may be used by institutions as eligible collateral for credit risk mitigation purposes. One of the eligibility criteria for collateral is that it should be sufficiently liquid. To be considered as main indices for the purposes of the CRR, equity indices should consist mainly of equities that can reasonably be expected to be realizable when an institution needs to liquidate them. Equity indices listed include STOXX Asia/Pacific 600, TSX60, Hang Seng Mainland 100 Index (China), FTSE Europe Index, S&P BMI France, Nikkei 300 and the OMXS60. The convertible bond indices listed as main indices are Exane ECI-Europe, Jefferies JACI Global and Thomson Reuters Global Convertible.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Discusses Marketplace Lending
09/13/2016
As part of the inaugural Marketplace Lending Policy Summit 2016, US Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry discussed marketplace lending’s risks and associated policy questions. Of note, Comptroller Curry addressed the OCC’s work around responsible innovation and feedback it has received to date on potentially granting federal banking charters to fintech firms. Curry noted that if the OCC does decide to grant limited-purpose charters in this area, the institutions who receive the charters will be held to the same strict standards of safety, soundness and fairness that other federally chartered institutions must meet.
View Comptroller Curry's remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Draft Guidance on Non-Performing Loans
09/12/2016
The European Central Bank published proposed draft Guidance on non-performing loans. The proposed Guidance addresses the main aspects of strategy, governance and operations for resolving NPLs. Once finalized, the Guidance will apply to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. Eurozone banks will be expected to apply the Guidance proportionately with those banks that have a high level of NPLs taking greater actions. The ECB Banking Supervision emphasizes that an NPL strategy should outline the bank’s approach and objectives regarding the effective management and ultimate reduction of NPL stocks in a clear, credible and feasible manner for each relevant portfolio. The ECB also published the results of a survey which it undertook with eight national supervisory authorities. The survey assesses the legal and supervisory practices of eight of the Eurozone countries. The ECB considers that some of those countries should revise and strengthen the legal framework on NPLs. Responses to the consultation are due by November 15, 2016.
View the draft Guidance and related information.
View the draft Guidance.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Core Funding Ratio
09/08/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report analyzing the core funding ratio across the EU. The report comes in response to a call for advice from the European Commission to explore the possibilities of the core funding ratio as a potential alternative metric for the assessment of EU banks’ funding risk, taking into account proportionality.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Issue Joint Report on Banking Activities and Investments
09/08/2016
On September 8, 2016, the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the OCC jointly issued, pursuant to a requirement under Section 620 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a study on the scope of permissible activities and investments engaged in by banking entities, and the associated risks of those activities. The banking entities covered in the study include insured depository institutions and any company that controls an insured depository institution or is treated as a bank holding company.
The report recommends changes to mitigate risks associated with banking activities, including (i) repealing the authority of financial holding companies to engage in merchant banking and commodities activities, (ii) reviewing certain activities to determine whether changes in regulations are needed and (iii) clarifying certain prudential rules and regulations. If enacted, the Federal Reserve Board’s recommendations relating to merchant banking and commodities activities would significantly restrict the permissible activities of FHCs established under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999. The Federal Reserve Board also recommended the repeal of exemptions available to owners of industrial loan companies and grandfathered savings and loans.
View the text of the Report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Sets Framework for Setting the Countercyclical Capital Buffer
09/08/2016
The Federal Reserve Board issued a policy statement setting forth the framework for setting the Countercyclical Capital Buffer for private-sector credit exposures in the United States. The CCyB is a macroprudential tool that is intended to assist banking organizations in absorbing shocks associated with fluctuations in credit conditions. As a general matter, the CCyB applies to large internationally active banking organizations that are subject to the advanced approaches capital rules (i.e., those with more than $250 billion in assets or $10 billion in on-balance-sheet foreign exposures), and to any depository institution subsidiary of such banking organizations. The policy statement describes the types of financial system vulnerabilities and other factors that the Federal Reserve Board may take into account as it evaluates settings for the buffer, which may include: leverage in the nonfinancial and financial sectors, maturity and liquidity transformation in the financial sector and asset valuation pressures. However, the range of indicators and models that may be considered will likely change over time. Once activated, the CCyB imposes heightened capital requirements on such covered institutions, which heightened requirements may be removed or reduced by the Federal Reserve Board upon determination that financial conditions that led to the activation of the CCyB have abated or lessened. In addition, the policy statement notes that the Federal Reserve Board will provide notice and seek comment from the public on the proposed level of the CCyB as part of making any final determination to change the CCyB.
View Federal Reserve Board policy statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserce System Extends Deadline for FR Y-9C
09/08/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted revisions to the FR Y-9C reporting form, a standardized financial statement for consolidated bank holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board revised the FR Y-9C to, among other things, delete existing data items, increase existing thresholds for certain data items, and clarify certain instructional items. The changes were originally proposed to take effect on March 31, 2016. In response to comments, the Federal Reserve Board is generally delaying the effective date for implementation for certain changes to September 30, 2016, while others will become effective March 31, 2017.
View the text of adopting releaseTopic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Legislation Amending Indicators used in the Methodology for the Identification of Global Systemically Important Institutions
09/08/2016
A Commission Delegated Regulation amending the Regulatory Technical Standards specifying the methodology for the identification by national regulators of global systemically important institutions and the definition of subcategories of GSIIs was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS specify quantifiable indicators forming the five categories to be used when measuring the systemic significance of a bank. The RTS is based on international standards developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to assess global systemically important banks and on the higher loss absorbency requirement. This methodology is regularly updated. The Amending Regulation updates the reporting templates and reporting instructions for the data collection for 2016 as well as the current values of the indicators that are to be determined.
The Amending Regulation entered into force on September 9, 2016.
View the Regulation.
View the original RTS.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of Currency Prohibiting Industrial or Commercial Metals Investments
09/08/2016
As it indicated it would do in the Joint Report on Banking Activities and Investments, the OCC issued a proposed rule that would prohibit national banks and federal savings associations from dealing and investing in industrial or commercial metal. If finalized, the prohibition would cover metal, including alloy, in a physical form primarily suited to industrial or commercial use (including, for example: copper cathodes, aluminum T-bars and gold jewelry). The proposal states that such metals do not constitute “exchange, coin, and bullion” under 12 USC 24(Seventh), nor would buying or selling such metals for the purpose of dealing or investing in that metal be part of or incidental to the business of banking. By operation of various federal laws, the prohibition would also apply to FDIC-insured state banks and to US branches and agencies of foreign banks. Comments must be submitted 60 days from the date of the proposed rule’s publication in the Federal Register.
View Text of OCC Proposed RuleTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Progress Report on Basel III Implementation
08/29/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a report to the G20 leaders, providing an update on implementation of the Basel III regulatory reforms since the Basel Committee’s last progress report in November 2015. The Basel Committee concluded that the Basel III capital and liquidity standards have generally been transposed into domestic regulations within the time frame set by the Committee. Since the last report, key components such as the risk-based capital standards and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio have now been enforced by all member jurisdictions, while the global systematically important banks framework has been enforced by all member jurisdictions that are home jurisdictions to G-SIBs. The Basel Committee highlighted the ongoing efforts of member jurisdictions to adopt other Basel III standards such as the leverage ratio and the Net Stable Funding Ratio.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation New Issues of Supervisory Insights
08/22/2016
The US FDIC released the Summer 2016 issue of its publication, Supervisory Insights. The magazine contains two original articles and the regular “Regulatory and Supervisory Roundup” which provides summaries of recently released regulations and supervisory guidance. An article entitled “De Novo Banks: Economic Trends and Supervisory Framework,” lays out trends the FDIC staff has observed in de novo formation, the FDIC application review process and steps the FDIC takes to supervise and support new banking institutions. Another article entitled, “Matters Requiring Board Attention (MRBA)” provides a survey of trends among issues appearing in the MRBA section of examination reports. The article notes several specific trends: first, examinations resulting in MRBAs have declined since 2011, second, there have been relative increases in credit concentration risk management and liquidity management-related MRBAs, and third, corporate governance and IT practices are additional areas of increasing concern.
View Summer 2016 Supervisory Insights.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
White House Report on Impact of Financial Reform of Community Banks
08/10/2016
The White House Council of Economic Advisers released a report analyzing the impact of regulations issued pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on community banks, defined generally as banks with assets less than $10 billion. The report disputed claims that increased regulations have negatively impacted smaller-size institutions, noting areas where community banks have remained strong since the Dodd-Frank Act. The report also describes certain long-standing structural challenges that precede the Dodd-Frank Act which community banks have continued to face, and noted the “importance of implementing Dodd-Frank in a way that allows community banks to compete on a level playing field.” In response, Republicans on the US House of Representatives Financial Services Committee published a blog post countering the assertions in the White House report, and posted statements from various community bankers and other small financial services operators commenting on the negative ways in which Dodd-Frank Act reforms have impacted their respective institutions.
View text of the White House Report.
View the HFSC blog post.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Amends Technical Standards on Benchmarking of Internal Approaches under CRD IV
08/04/2016
The European Banking Authority published an amended version of its implementing technical standards on benchmarking of internal approaches under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. The ITS have been amended to assist regulators in their 2017 benchmarking assessment of internal approaches for credit risk and market risk. The 2016 exercise covered credit risk for so-called high-default portfolios (small and medium enterprises and retail) and market risk portfolios. The 2017 exercise will focus on low-default portfolios. The EBA noted that it intends to update the ITS annually to ensure the quality of future benchmarking exercises. The amended ITS have been published as a package of documents with consolidated instructions, templates and annexes. The amended ITS have been submitted to the European Commission but as of yet have not been adopted.
View the amended ITS.
View the amended draft benchmarking package.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Statement on the Leverage Ratio
08/04/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a statement inviting firms to apply for a temporary modification of the application of the Leverage Ratio, Public Disclosure and Reporting Leverage Ratio parts of the PRA Rulebook to them. The modification is available to firms that are currently subject to the UK leverage ratio framework. The statement follows a recommendation in July from the Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England on the composition of the total exposure measure for the purposes of the leverage ratio, which stated that when applying its rules on the leverage ratio, the PRA should consider allowing firms to exclude from the calculation of the total exposure measure those assets constituting claims on central banks where they are matched by deposits accepted by the firm that are denominated in the same currency and of identical or longer maturity.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Proposed Approach to Implementation of the Systemic Risk Buffer
07/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on its proposed approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer. The consultation paper is relevant to ring-fenced bodies under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and large building societies that hold more than £25 billion in deposits (where one or more of the accountholders is a small business) and shares (excluding deferred shares). These are jointly referred to as “SRB institutions”. The UK Independent Commission on Banking recommended that UK systematically important SRB institutions be held to a higher capital standard. In addition to these recommendations, the UK legislation implementing the systematic risk buffer requires that the PRA apply the Financial Policy Committee framework as of January 1, 2019. The PRA’s proposals outline the scope of the framework, the capital implications of the SRB and the PRA’s approach to applying the SRB.
The PRA has proposed that: (i) it will, in the exercise of sound supervisory judgement, only deviate from the SRB rates derived from the FPC framework in exceptional cases; (ii) for building societies in scope of the framework, the applicable basis of the framework will be the group consolidated basis for building societies that are the parents of consolidation groups and the individual basis for all others; (iii) the initial SRB rates will be set and announced by the PRA in early 2019 and will apply three months after being set; and (iv) following the application of the initial SRB rates, rates will be set and announced annually and will apply in the second year following the calendar year in which they were set.
Responses to the proposals are due by October 28, 2016.
View the PRA update.
View the consultation paper.
View the FPC framework and associated consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Results of EU Stress Test Published
07/29/2016
The European Banking Authority published the results of the EU-wide stress test. The stress test covered 51 EEA banks and assessed the resilience of the EEA banking sector to adverse financial conditions. Unlike the stress tests conducted in 2011 and 2014, the 2016 stress test did not aim to identify possible capital shortfalls, as the EBA considers that after five years of continuous capital raising in the EU banking sector, the crisis type of stress test appears to be less relevant. It is intended instead that supervisors will use the 2016 results to assess banks’ forward looking capital planning. The results of the stress test will be used by national regulators in their Supervisory Review Process to assess each bank's capital planning going forward.
View the stress test documentation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors Federal Reserve Expansion of CFO Attestation to Intermediate Holding Companies07/28/2016
The Federal Reserve Board published a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the Capital Assessments and Stress Testing information collection applicable to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and US intermediate holding companies established by foreign banking organizations. The Federal Reserve Board proposed revising the FR Y-14A, Q and M schedules to expand the chief financial officer attestation reporting requirement applicable to US BHCs subject to the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee (LISCC) framework to US IHC respondents on a phased-in basis beginning with reports as of December 31, 2017. The CFO-attestation requirement was finalized for US BHCs earlier this year and implementation is required on a phased-in basis for reports as of December 31, 2016.
The proposal also provides for revisions to the FR Y-14A that include data on the supplementary leverage ratio as well as to include information on material operational risks included in loss projections, operational risk scenarios and updated documentation requirements to align with SR Letter 15-18. Comments were due by September 26, 2016.
View Federal Reserve Board Proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Further Criteria on Preferential Treatment for Calculating the Liquidity Coverage Requirement for Intra-group Liquidity Flows
07/27/2016
The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the criteria for the application of preferential treatment in cross-border intragroup credit or liquidity lines, or within an institutional protection scheme. The Capital Requirements Regulation permits regulators to grant preferential treatment for transactions within a group or an institutional protection scheme by applying higher inflow rates (in the case of the liquidity receiver) or lower outflow rates (in the case of the liquidity provider) for calculating the liquidity coverage requirement for intra-group liquidity flows. Where transactions within a group or an institutional protection scheme constitute cross-border positions, preferential treatment is conditional upon compliance with additional objective criteria specified in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Act. The Capital Requirements Regulation mandates the EBA to develop draft RTS to specify additional objective criteria.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Guidelines for Implementation of an Expected Credit Loss Accounting Model
07/26/2016
The European Banking Authority published draft Guidelines on bank’s credit risk management practices and accounting for expected losses. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for the accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. IFRS 9 requires the measurement of impairment loss allowances to be based on an expected credit loss accounting model rather than on an incurred loss accounting model. Many EU banks use the IFRS standards and because the use of an ECL accounting model involves some discretion in it application, the EBA is proposing that bank’s use the Guidelines when implementing and applying IFRS 9. The proposed Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the relevant provisions of the CRR and CRD. The consultation closes on October 26, 2016. The EBA intends to finalize the Guidelines in Q4 2016 or Q1 2017. The finalized Guidelines will need to be implemented by January 1, 2018.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Connected Clients under the Capital Requirements Regulation
07/26/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper proposing an updated version of the guidelines on the implementation of the large exposures regime that was issued by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors on December 11, 2009. The large exposures regime has since been amended by the Capital Requirements Regulation and complemented by European Commission and EBA guidelines. In light of the CRR amendments, the EBA has reviewed and updated the 2009 CEBS Guidelines and presented the results of the review in the consultation paper. -
US Federal Reserve Extends Comment Period for Detailing Conceptual Frameworks for Capital Standards
07/25/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board extended until September 16, 2016, the comment period for the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking detailing conceptual frameworks for capital standards that could apply to systemically important insurance companies and to insurance companies that own a bank or thrift. The Federal Reserve Board proposal presents one approach, known as the “consolidated approach,” that would apply to systemically important insurance companies and a second approach, referred to as the “building block approach,” for the supervised insurance companies that own a bank or thrift. The Federal Reserve Board extended the comment period, originally set for August 17, 2016, to allow interested persons more time to analyze the issues and prepare their comments.
View Proposed Rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Report on Asset Quality in the EU Banking Sector
07/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report on the recent dynamics, cross-country dispersion and drivers of non-performing exposures in the EU banking sector. The report covers a review of 166 EU banks from September 2014 to March 2016. The EBA notes that there is a high disparity between jurisdictions, suggesting that the average non-performing loan (NPL) ratio is up to three times higher in the EU than in other jurisdictions. The report provides an overview of asset quality across jurisdictions and analyzes the riskiness of counterparties in different countries and the structural characteristics of local markets that can affect credit quality, provisioning policies and recovery of distressed assets.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Decision on Quality of Certain Unsolicited Credit Assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions
07/22/2016
A Decision of the European Banking Authority on unsolicited credit assessments was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The EBA decided that unsolicited credit assessments of certain External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs) did not differ from their solicited credit assessments. An ECAI is a credit rating agency that has been registered or certified under the EU CRA Regulation or a central bank issuing credit ratings which are exempt from the application of the CRA Regulation.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
MD of International Monetary Fund Concerned about Breakdown in Correspondent Banking
07/18/2016
The Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, gave a speech before the Federal Reserve Bank of New York about the struggles facing the global financial market’s smaller players in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Director Lagarde stated that due to heightened post-financial crisis regulations and anti-money laundering rules, many large global banks were prompted to reevaluate their correspondent banking models with smaller countries, and chose to reduce cross-border banking services offered to those entities considered too risky or unprofitable. In connection with those trends, Director Lagarde expressed concern that the global consequences of large banks withdrawing from vulnerable smaller countries, if left unaddressed, could become systemic and disruptive. She urged regulators to collect data and facilitate discussions with banks on this issue. Finally, Director Lagarde emphasized that “a strong and open international financial system is key to restore momentum in the global economy,” and that global banks must avoid “knee-jerk” reactions to increased regulatory costs.
View Director of Lagarde's speech.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Senators Urge Regulators to Reconsider Regulations Applicable to Regional Banks
07/18/2016
Senators Tim Kaine (D-Va) (the Democratic vice-presidential nominee), Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), Gary C. Peters (D-Mich.) and Robert P. Casey (D-Pa.) wrote a letter to the heads of the US Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the OCC, requesting an exemption for certain large regional banks from the requirements of the liquidity coverage ratio and the advanced approaches risk-based capital rules. In their letter, the senators argue that it would be unfair for large regional banks to be subjected to the same LCR and capital rules requirements as are applied to riskier, more complex, systemically important banks.
Currently, because LCR reporting requirements are based on an asset threshold test, some large regional banks are subject to heightened LCR requirements, which requires, among other things, certain daily reporting of liquidity levels. Large regional banks may also, by virtue of size or foreign exposure, be subject to the “advanced approaches” capital requirements that dictate capital reserves a bank must hold to cover potential losses. The senators argue that regional banks should be exempted from complying with the burdens of both the LCR requirement and the Advanced Approaches requirements because they do not share the “same risk profile or complexity” as systemically important banks. The Senators also stated generally that the regulatory regime should move away from reliance on an internal models approach on the theory that such reliance obscures a bank’s financial status.
View full text of the letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Data Collection Exercise to Assist with Review of the Prudential Framework for Investment Firms
07/15/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a data collection exercise to support its response to the European Commission’s Call for Advice on a new prudential framework for investment firms subject to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. In December 2014, the Commission sought technical advice from the EBA and the European Securities and Markets Authority on whether the current prudential framework applicable to MiFID investment firms under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation was appropriate in terms of risk sensitivity, proportionality and complexity. In response, the EBA concluded that the regime was not appropriate for the risks that MiFID investment firms are exposed to and made recommendations.
Read more. -
US FDIC Chairman Testifies on De Novo Banks and Industrial Loan Companies
07/14/2016
Chairman of the US FDIC Martin J. Gruenberg testified before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the US House of Representatives regarding de novo banks and industrial loan companies. During his testimony, he provided an overview of recent banking industry performance and condition, discussed trends in de novo bank and ILC formation, and steps the FDIC is taking to support the creation of de novo banks. Chairman Gruenberg testified that there have been few de novo banks formed in recent years, noting that since January 2011, the FDIC has received only ten applications for deposit insurance for de novo institutions and no applications for new ILCs. Of these ten applications, three were approved, five were withdrawn and two are still in process. Gruenberg noted that although community bank earnings have recovered in recent years, low interest rates and narrow net interest margins have kept bank profitability ratios (return on assets and return on equity) well below pre-crisis levels, making it relatively unattractive to start new banks. Gruenberg also noted that the FDIC is continuing to monitor developments with respect to the formation of new banking institutions, and recently announced a number of initiatives to support the efforts of viable organizing groups in creating new institutions. For example, the FDIC has begun a “Questions and Answers” series to help applicants better develop their proposals and has presented an overview of the deposit insurance application process to a conference of state bank supervisory agencies. Moreover, on April 6, 2016, the FDIC reduced the period of enhanced supervisory monitoring of newly insured depository institutions from seven years to three years.
View Chairman Gruenberg's Testimony.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Guidance on Recognition of Institution Protection Schemes
07/12/2016
The European Central Bank published its Guide on the approach for the recognition of institution protection schemes for prudential purposes. The Capital Requirements Regulation defines an IPS as a contractual or statutory liability arrangement which protects its member institutions and ensures that they have the liquidity and solvency needed to avoid, where necessary, bankruptcy. Certain waivers or derogations of capital requirements are available for IPS member institutions under CRR. In particular, CRR provides that the ECB may, subject to certain exceptions, allow credit institutions to apply a 0% risk weight to exposures to other counterparties which are members of the same IPS with the exception of exposures giving rise to Common Equity Tier 1, Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 items. The ECB directly supervises the largest Eurozone banks for prudential purposes and overseas the prudential supervision by national regulators of the smaller Eurozone banks. The ECB's Guide sets out how it intends to assess compliance of an IPS and its members with the requirements set out in the CRR to grant such a waiver.
View the Guide.
View the feedback statement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Revises its Securitization Framework
07/11/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published an amended Securitization Framework to include alternative regulatory capital treatment for simple, transparent and comparable (STC) securitisations. The Securitization Framework, which was initially published on December 11, 2014, forms part of Basel III. The amendments to the Securitization Framework provide for lower capital charges to apply to STC Securitizations, and include criteria that should be applied to differentiate STC securitizations from other securitizations. The new capital treatment for STC securitizations should be read in conjunction with the criteria for identifying STC securitizations (published by the Basel Committee and the International Organization of Securities Commissions in July 2015). The Securitization Framework, as amended, is due to come into effect in January 2018.
View the updated Securitization Framework.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulator Publishes Policy Statement on Implementation of Ring-Fencing
07/07/2016
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement on the implementation of ring-fencing, covering prudential requirements, intragroup arrangements and the use of financial market infrastructures. The policy statement summarizes feedback received to the consultation paper published in October 2015. The PRA states that it does not consider that the responses received to the consultation paper have necessitated any significant changes to its proposals.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK's Financial Policy Committee Responds to Brexit Vote by Eliminating the Countercyclical Buffer for Bank Capital
07/05/2016
The Bank of England published its latest Financial Stability Report in which the Bank's Financial Policy Committee sets out the key risks to the UK's financial system and weighs them against the resilience of the system. In March 2016, the FPC had identified areas through which there could be increased risk to the UK's financial stability as a result of the vote by the UK public to leave the EU. Such areas include financing of the UK's large current account deficit, the commercial real estate market, the high level of household indebtedness, limited growth in the global economy and vulnerabilities in the functioning of the financial markets. The FPC states that there is evidence that some of these risks have begun to crystallize and that the current outlook for financial stability is challenging. The FPC is monitoring closely the risks of, amongst other things, further deterioration in investor appetite for UK assets, adjustments in commercial real estate markets tightening credit conditions and reduced and fragile liquidity in core financial markets.
To support the supply of credit and in support of market functioning, the FPC has reduced the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate from 0.5% to 0% of banks' UK exposures with immediate effect. This rate is expected to remain in effect until June 2017, and will reduce regulatory capital buffers by £5.7 billion. The FPC continues to monitor the risks closely.
View the report.
You may like to view our client publications and webinar materials on the impact of Brexit, available here. -
European Banking Authority Reports on Level of Asset Encumbrance
07/04/2016
The European Banking Authority published its second report analyzing the level of asset encumbrance across EU banks. The analysis aims to assist EU supervisors in assessing how banks manage funding stress as well as the impact that switching from unsecured to secured funding might have on banks in conditions of stress. The report is based on data received for December 2014 and December 2015 further to a requirement under the Capital Requirements Regulation for banks to report levels of repurchase agreements, securities lending and all forms of asset encumbrance to national regulators and for the EBA to prepare annual reports based on that data. The analysis shows that there has been no significant increase in the overall weighted average encumbrance ratio over the last year. The report noted that high levels of asset encumbrance in some countries (notably Denmark and Sweden) were driven by large covered bond markets or by high central bank funding in countries affected by the sovereign debt crisis (e.g. Greece) or by high levels of repo financing and collateral requirements for OTC derivatives (e.g. UK and Belgium).
View the report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Results of Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
06/29/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it has not objected to the capital plans of 30 of the 33 bank holding companies participating in the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Federal Reserve Board objected to two firms’ plans and while one other firm’s plan was not objected to, it is being required to address certain weaknesses and resubmit its plan by the end of 2016.
CCAR evaluates the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of the largest US-based bank holding companies (including US BHC subsidiaries of non-US banking organizations), including the firms’ planned capital actions such as dividend payments and share buybacks and issuances. When considering a firm’s capital plan, the Federal Reserve Board analyzes, and may object to a capital plan based on, quantitative factors (e.g., a firm’s projected capital ratios under a hypothetical scenario of severe economic and financial market stress) and qualitative factors (e.g., the strength of the firm’s capital planning process, which incorporate the risk management, internal controls and governance practices that support the process). If the Federal Reserve Board objects to a capital plan, a firm may not make any capital distribution unless expressly authorized by the Federal Reserve Board.
Since the first round of stress tests led by the Federal Reserve Board in 2009, the common equity capital ratio, which compares high-quality capital to risk-weighted assets, of the 33 bank holding companies in the 2016 CCAR has more than doubled from 5.5 percent in the first quarter of 2009 to 12.2 percent in the first quarter of 2016. This reflects an increase of more than $700 billion in common equity capital to a total of $1.2 trillion during the same period.
View CCAR 2016 assessment framework and results.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Proposed EU Guidelines on Implementing the Revised Pillar 3 Framework
06/29/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation proposing Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA aims to ensure harmonized and timely implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The proposed Guidelines will introduce specific guidance and formats for disclosure, using tables and templates. Responses to the consultation are due by September 29, 2016. The Guidelines are set to apply for year-end disclosures 2017. However, the EBA recommends that Globally Systemically Important Institutions implement a limited subset of disclosures relating to risk-weighted assets and capital requirements for the year-end 2016 disclosures.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Extension of Exemption for Commodity Dealers Finalized
06/29/2016
An EU Regulation extending the exemption for commodity dealers from large exposures requirements and own fund requirements was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The exemption has been extended from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2020 or until a revised framework for the application of the Capital Requirements Regulation to commodity dealers and investment firms comes into force, whichever is the earlier. The European Council announced in March this year that it had agreed to the extension.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Releases Results of Supervisory Bank Stress Tests
06/23/2016
The US Federal Reserve Board released the results of supervisory stress tests for 33 participating BHCs, representing more than 80 percent of US domestic banking assets. According to the Federal Reserve Board, the largest US bank holding companies “continue to build their capital levels and improve their credit quality, strengthening their ability to lend to households and businesses during a severe recession.”
Under the most severe hypothetical scenario, the results project that loan losses at the 33 participating firms would total $385 billion during the nine quarters tested. This “severely adverse” scenario features a severe global recession with the domestic unemployment rate rising five percentage points, accompanied by a heightened period of financial stress and negative yields for short-term US Treasury securities. In addition to results under the severely adverse hypothetical scenario, the Federal Reserve Board also released results from the “adverse” scenario, which features a moderate recession and mild deflation in the United States. In this scenario, the average common equity tier 1 capital ratio of the 33 firms fell from an actual 12.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015 to a projected minimum level of 10.5 percent in the first quarter of 2018.
The Dodd-Frank Act supervisory stress tests are one component of the Federal Reserve Board’s analysis during the CCAR, which is an annual exercise to evaluate the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of large bank holding companies. This is the sixth round of stress tests led by the Federal Reserve Board since 2009 and the fourth round required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
View Supervisory Stress Test Methodology and Results.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Publishes Supervisory Statement on Governance and Risk Appetite Frameworks for Euro Banks
06/21/2016
The Banking Supervision arm of the European Central Bank published a Single Supervisory Mechanism supervisory statement on governance and risk appetite. In 2015, a thematic review was undertaken of all significant firms in the euro area to assess their management bodies and their risk appetite frameworks. The supervisory statement reports on the findings from that review, identifies good practices and sets out supervisory expectations for a bank's board and risk appetite framework, aiming to guide banks on their implementation of international best practices.
View the supervisory statement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US FDIC Proposes to Amend References to Credit Ratings for Activities of Foreign Bank Organizations
06/21/2016
The FDIC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to remove and modify references to credit ratings with respect to permissible activities for certain foreign banking organizations, consistent with section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act and the FDIC’s authority under section 5(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Specifically, the proposed rule amends subparts A and B of the FDIC’s international banking regulations (12 C.F.R. Part 347). The proposed rule would delete references in Subpart A to nationally recognized statistical rating organization credit ratings in the definition of “investment grade” and replace such references with alternative standards for determining the creditworthiness of securities and other financial instruments. Subpart B would be amended in a similar fashion to eliminate references to credit ratings in respect of the eligibility criteria for assets that foreign banks may pledge in order to satisfy the FDIC’s asset pledge requirement. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due by August 29, 2016.
View FDIC notice of proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Agencies Issue Joint Statement on New Accounting Standard on the Measurement of Credit Losses
06/17/2016
The Federal Reserve Board, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US National Credit Union Administration released a joint statement providing information about the new Financial Accounting Standards Board statement regarding credit loss estimation. The joint statement provides supervisory views regarding the recently introduced standard which introduces the current expected credit losses methodology for estimating credit losses. This standard applies to all banks, savings associations, credit unions and financial holding companies, regardless of their asset size. Early application is permitted for fiscal years after December 15, 2018, but the rule becomes effective in 2020 for public business entities that are US Securities and Exchange Commission filers, and in 2021 for public business entities that are not SEC-filers and private companies.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Annual Report
06/15/2016
The European Banking Authority published its annual report which provides a review of the EBA’s work in 2015 and sets out key areas of focus it has forecast for the short term future. The EBA lists its achievements in 2015 in the following categories: (i) completing the Single Rulebook and enhancing consistency in prudential regulation; (ii) concluding the regulatory framework for effective recovery, resolution and deposit guarantee schemes; (iii) strengthening supervisory convergence and ensuring the consistent implementation of supervisory and regulatory practices across the EU; (iv) identifying, analyzing and addressing the key risks in the EU banking sector; (v) protecting consumers monitoring financial innovation and ensuring secure and efficient payment services across the EU; (vi) international engagement; and (vii) working on cross-sectoral issues.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Annual Report 2015
06/15/2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority published its 2015 annual report. The report reviews ESMA’s mission and objectives for 2015 and measures its achievements against its 2015 objectives. The report also provides information on ESMA's operations, budget and structure. ESMA is charged with enhancing the protection of investors and promoting stable and orderly financial markets, with various roles under legislation such as EMIR and MiFID. The report states that ESMA has made significant steps in realizing its mission by assessing risks to investors, markets and financial stability, completing a single rulebook for EU financial markets, promoting supervisory convergence and supervising credit rating agencies and trade repositories.
View the report. -
Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group Position Paper on Supervisory Convergence
06/13/2016
The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group published advice to the European Securities and Markets Authority in a Position Paper on Supervisory Convergence. The Paper outlines supervisory convergence as one of the key strategies to be pursued by ESMA from 2016 until 2020. The SMSG also outlines the possible role it may take in supporting ESMA to ensure consistent supervisory practice across the European Union.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Joint Industry Response to Basel Committee Consultation on Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements
06/10/2016
The Institute of International Finance, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Global Financial Markets Associations jointly issued an open letter to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The letter outlines the collective views of the Associations on the Basel Committee's Consultative Document on Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements which was published on March 11, 2016. The consultation was a second phase review of the proposed consolidated and enhanced framework for Pillar 3 disclosures under Basel III.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Issues Guidance for Assessing Risk Management at Institutions with Less Than $50 Billion in Assets
06/08/2016
The Federal Reserve Board issued supervisory guidance for supervised institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $50 billion for assessing risk management. The guidance notes that sound risk management principles should apply to all risks facing an institution, including, but not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, compliance and legal risk. The guidance states that in evaluating an institution’s risk management framework, examiners should evaluate four key areas: board and senior management oversight of risk management, policies, procedures and limits, risk monitoring and management information systems and internal controls. The guidance provides additional considerations that examiners should look for in connection with each of these areas, but notes that the considerations listed therein are not a checklist. The guidance explicitly recognizes that risk management processes and control functions for the US operations of foreign banking organizations may be implemented domestically or outside of the United States. However, in cases where the functions are performed outside of the United States, the guidance states that the oversight function, policies and procedures, and information systems need to be sufficiently transparent to allow US supervisors to assess their adequacy.
View the guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US House Financial Services Committee Chairman Outlines Proposal to Replace the Dodd-Frank Act
06/07/2016US House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling provided remarks regarding proposed legislation to replace the Dodd-Frank Act. The Executive Summary and additional details were subsequently released, and the full bill is expected to be released later this month. Under the proposal, banks that maintain a leverage ratio of at least 10 percent and a composite CAMELS rating of 1 or 2 would be deemed well-capitalized and able to elect able to opt out of many regulatory requirements, including capital and liquidity requirements and limits on capital distributions and mergers or acquisitions. The proposal would also repeal Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act (the orderly liquidation authority) and replace it with a new subchapter of the US Bankruptcy Code, remove the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, to designate firms as systemically important and certain payments and clearing organizations as systemically important financial market utilities, and reform the Securities and Exchange Commission and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
View the Executive Summary of the Financial Choice Act and Representative Hensarling’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Decision on Data for Supervisory Benchmarking
06/02/2016
The European Banking Authority published a decision, dated May 31, 2016, on data for supervisory benchmarking under the Capital Requirements Directive. The CRD requires that regulators monitor the range of risk-weighted exposure amounts or own funds requirements, as applicable, except for operation risk, for the exposures or those relating to transactions in benchmark portfolios resulting from the internal approaches adopted by firms. Regulators are also required to assess, at least annually, the quality of the relevant approaches adopted by institutions. In performing this function, regulators receive benchmarking information and data in accordance with the Benchmarking Implementation Regulation. The EBA is required under the CRD to assist regulators in their assessment with regard to supervisory benchmarking. The Decision follows publication of the amended technical standards on benchmarking of internal approaches and requires regulators to submit data for the 2016 benchmarking. Following delay in the EU’s adoption of the Benchmarking Implementation Regulation, the EBA has repealed its previous decision on the topic and replaced it with this decision.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Announces Date of Release for Results of Supervisory Stress Tests and the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
06/02/2016
The Federal Reserve Board announced that it would release results from the latest supervisory stress tests on Thursday, June 23, 2016. Results from the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review will be released on Wednesday, June 29, 2016. The stress tests, conducted pursuant to requirements in the Dodd-Frank Act, and the CCAR exercises aim to help large bank holding companies assess the sufficiency of their capital and capital planning processes, taking into account the unique risks of the institutions and the companies’ risk measurement and risk management procedures.
View the Federal Reserve Board’s press release regarding the stress testing and CCAR results.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Legislation on Exclusion on the Application of Write-down or Conversion Powers under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive
06/01/2016
A Commission Delegated Regulation further specifying the circumstances in which exclusion from the application of write-down or conversion powers is necessary under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Under the BRRD, the bail-in tool may be applied to all liabilities unless they fall within the list of liabilities explicitly excluded. The new Regulation provides that regulators may only exclude a liability if the obstacles invoked for such exercise do not allow for it to take place within a reasonable time. The BRRD only allows regulators to exclude a liability from bail-in, if it considers that it is not possible to bail-in the liability within a “reasonable time,” which is determined by assessing when the write-down amount ultimately has to be determined; and then assessing, the time by which all tasks needed to bail-in those liabilities would need to be performed in order to meet the resolution objectives. The new Regulation specifies that regulators may exclude liabilities on the basis of it being necessary and proportionate to preserve critical functions and core business lines under the BRRD. The Regulation will apply from June 21, 2016.
View the delegated regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Corrections to EU Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation Published in Official Journal
06/01/2016
A Commission Delegated Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union correcting two Commission Delegated Regulations under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. The Regulation corrects a previous Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing the CRR with regard to the Regulatory Technical Standards for non-delta risk of options in the standardized market risk approach. Under the CRR, the EBA is empowered to develop a range of methods to reflect non-delta risks in the own funds requirements of firms in a manner proportionate to the scale and complexity of firms’ activities in options and warrants. One approach to measure non-delta risks of options and warrants is the “simplified approach”. The EBA developed draft RTS accordingly, under which institutions that exclusively purchased options and warrants were obliged to use the simplified approach and did not prevent other institutions from using this approach. The correction states that only institutions that exclusively purchase options and warrants may use the simplified approach, which removes the obligation on such firms to only use the simplified approach and prevents other firms from using it.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Regulatory Reporting Requirements for Intermediate Holding Companies of Foreign Banking Organizations
06/01/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted a proposal to extend various regulatory reporting requirements to US intermediate holding company (IHC) subsidiaries of foreign banking organizations. The final reporting requirements are generally the same as the proposal, with a few adjustments and clarifications. Under the final requirements, the Federal Reserve noted that it will consider requests to modify the financial data for previous years that an IHC would be required to report, or extend the time period by which an IHC would have to report the historical data on the applicable Form FR Y-14. The FR Y-14 series of reports generally collects data for stress-testing purposes. The Federal Reserve Board also clarified that it is not requiring at this time that the FR Y-14 attestation requirement apply to IHC subsidiaries of US bank holding companies subject to the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee. The Federal Reserve Board also extends the IHC’s first filing date of the FR Y-15 form to December 5, 2016 to allow institutions time to facilitate accurate reporting.
View the Final Rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on EU Implementation of the Net Stable Funding Ratio
05/26/2016
The European Commission published a consultation paper on the implementation of the NSFR at European Union level. The Net Stable Funding Ratio measures the assumed degree of stability of liabilities and the liquidity of assets over a one-year horizon. The CRR introduced reporting requirements for the NSFR without setting any more detailed requirements. The EBA published a report in December 2015 on whether, and how, it would be appropriate to ensure that institutions use stable sources of funding, supporting the Basel Committee NSFR at a European level but with some specificities regarding its calibration. To supplement the Commission’s analysis of the EBA’s report and Call for Evidence published in September 2015, the Commission is calling for a more nuanced treatment of specific business models and some transactions. The consultation seeks views on the treatment of specific aspects of the NSFR, derivative and short-term transactions (less than six months) with financial institutions and the application of the proportionality principle, in particular, the appropriate level of NSFR application and the criteria for defining institutions with a “low liquidity risk profile”.
Responses to the consultation are due by June 24, 2016.
View the consultation on implementation of NSFR.
View the EBA report on NSFR.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Finalizes its Systemic Risk Buffer Framework
05/26/2016
The Financial Policy Committee published the final UK framework for the Systemic Rick Buffer for ring-fenced banks and large building societies (i.e. those that will be subject to the UK ring-fencing rules from 2019 with assets over £25 billion). The SRB, a discretionary buffer under the EU Capital Requirements Directive, aims to mitigate and prevent long-term non-cyclical macro-prudential or systemic risk.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on Revisions to Capital Requirements Framework and EU Implementation of CRR
05/26/2016
The European Commission published a consultation paper on proposed options for implementing principles of proportionality in the upcoming capital requirements framework, to review the Original Exposure Method and replace the current standardized approached for counterparty credit risk with a new standardized approach. The consultation looks at the potential introduction of new standards for market risks in the prudential framework as it provides an opportunity to reassess the issue of proportionality for smaller or simpler financial institutions. The current risk framework contained in the CRR establishes some principles of proportionality but there is no derogation for small trading book businesses which would allow firms with non-significant trading activities to use a simplified prudential framework to calculate requirements for their trading exposures. The proposed Basel Committee for Banking Supervision standardized approach would bring significant modifications to the current approach in the CRR, making it more risk sensitive and better suited for complex financial instruments. The Commission is considering whether to implement a simplified version of the new standardized approach or to keep the current standardized approach.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Amendments to EU Technical Standards on Disclosure for Identification of G-SIIs
05/25/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation which amends the Implementing Technical Standards on uniform formats and dates for the disclosure of values used to identify global systemically important institutions under the CRR was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The ITS supplement CRR provisions that require regulators to identify G-SIIs, based upon the templates issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The amended ITS take into account revisions proposed by the European Banking Authority in January 2016. G-SIIs are now required to report the information used to identify G-SIIs (such as indicators, ancillary data and memorandum items) to the regulator in electronic format, using a template annexed to amending ITS. The amended ITS provides that G-SIIs publicly disclose the values of the indicators used for determining the score of G-SIIs in accordance with the Commission Delegated Regulation on the methodology for the identification of G-SIIs. Information required in the template includes general information such as bank name and reporting dates. The template will also include monetary values on indicators such as payments made in the reporting year, assets under custody and underwritten transaction in debt and equity markets. The amending ITS entered into force on May 26, 2016.
View the amending ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on Stress Tests of Deposits Guarantee Schemes
05/24/2016
The European Banking Authority published guidelines for upcoming stress tests of deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive. The Directive introduced a number of measures to improve the resilience of deposit guarantee schemes in Europe and the EBA is required to perform stress tests every three years; the first is to take place by July 3, 2017. The purpose of the stress test is to verify whether the operation and funding capabilities of the DGS are sufficient to ensure deposit protection, within the conditions of the Directive, during times of increased pressure. The EBA has decided to produce guidelines for consistency across the European Union and to ensure that the stress test is a credible assessment tool.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Hoenig Objects to Proposed Revisions to the Basel III Leverage Ratio Framework
05/23/2016
As part of his remarks at a global economic symposium in Paris, US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig stated his objections to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s recently proposed revisions to the Basel III leverage ratio framework. In his speech, Hoenig noted that the banking industry has begun to lobby for special treatment or exemptions from capital requirements for a host of assets included in the leverage ratio calculation. Hoenig argued that if accepted, the effect of such proposed revisions would be to again lower acceptable industry capital standards.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Extends Comment Period on Deposit Account Recordkeeping Proposal
05/20/2016
The FDIC extended the comment period for proposed recordkeeping requirements for FDIC-insured institutions with at least 2 million deposit accounts. The purpose of the proposed recordkeeping requirements is to facilitate rapid payment of insured deposits to customers if large institutions were to fail. The proposed requirements would not apply to smaller institutions, including community banks.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Decision on Unsolicited Credit Assessments
05/17/2016
The European Banking Authority published a Decision permitting the use of unsolicited credit assessments of certain External Credit Assessment Institutions for calculating firm capital requirements. The Decision aims to harmonize regulation related to the use of solicited and unsolicited credit assessments across the European Union.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Report Assesses Impact of Supervisory Guidance on Leveraged Lending
05/16/2016
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York published a post on its Liberty Street Economics blog assessing the impact of interagency guidance intended to curtail leveraged lending issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC in March of 2013. The post shows that banks, in particular the largest institutions, cut leveraged lending while nonbanks increased such lending after the guidance. During the same period of time, nonbanks increased their borrowing from banks, possibly to finance their growing leveraged lending activity. The post notes that this evidence highlights an important challenge of macroprudential policies. Since those policies reach beyond individual banks and target risk in the entire banking system, they are more likely to trigger significant responses that may have unintended consequences.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Reject Proposed Amendments to Technical Standards on ECAIs Credit Assessments
05/12/2016
The European Banking Authority, European Securities and Markets Authority and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (known as the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities) published an Opinion on the European Commission's proposed amendments to the ESA's final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments to the risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Solvency II Directive. The ESA's submitted their final draft ITS to the European Commission in November 2015. The Commission notified the ESAs on March 30, 2016 that it intended to adopt the ITS with amendments by relaxing the ESA's approach to the mapping of ECAIs. The ESA's do not agree with the proposed amendments for several reasons including the fact that the Commission's approach favors promoting competition over financial stability risk concerns.
View the Opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation on Conditions for Derogation from the Liquidity Coverage Requirement
05/12/2016
A Commission Delegated Regulation containing Regulatory Technical Standards specifying the conditions for the application of derogations, concerning currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets, under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR sets out a Liquidity Coverage Requirement which requires firms to hold liquid assets to maintain adequate levels of liquidity buffers to cope with any possible imbalances between liquidity inflows and outflows. Firms may derogate from the LCR where the requirement exceeds the availability of those assets in a particular currency.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Pillar 2 Liquidity Risk Requirements
05/12/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on its proposed approach to Pillar 2 liquidity requirements for intraday risk, debt buyback and non-margined derivatives, including a proposed policy statement. The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set Pillar 2 liquidity requirements, in addition to the standard Pillar 1 Liquidity Coverage Ratio which applies to all firms. The PRA is proposing that: (i) the level of application for setting Pillar 2 requirements should be aligned to the Pillar 1 approach; (ii) there should be no specific disclosure requirements under Pillar 2, other than the disclosure of the high quality liquid assets required to cover Pillar 2 risks which are part of the LCR disclosure requirements; (iii) it will use supervisory discretion, guided by a firm's outstanding debt or exposures, to assess liquidity risk linked with debt buyback and non-margined derivatives; and (iv) the assessment of intraday liquidity risk will be based on a firm’s maximum net debits, stress testing framework and key characteristics, as well as the markets in which it operates.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Argues for Powers to Update Benchmarking Portfolios for Annual Benchmarking Exercise
05/12/2016
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the European Commission’s proposed amendments to the EBA's final draft Implementing Technical Standards on benchmarking of internal approaches to regulatory capital. The Capital Requirements Directive sets out a framework for supervisory benchmarking of the internal approaches that EU firms use to calculate own-funds requirements for credit and market risk exposures. The final draft ITS, submitted by the EBA to the Commission in March 2015, include the benchmarking portfolios, templates, definitions and IT solutions for usage in that exercise. On April 16, 2016, the European Commission informed the EBA that it intended to adopt the final draft ITS with amendments.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Mid-Cycle Status Report
05/11/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a mid-cycle status report on key actions that it has taken to date pursuant to its Committee on Bank Supervision’s annual operating plan for the fiscal year that commenced on October 1, 2015. The plan sets forth the agency’s broad supervision priorities and objectives and is used to develop individual bank supervisory strategies and make related resource allocation decisions. Key actions completed in the first half of fiscal year 2016 include issuing various supervisory communications, including 557 reports of examination, conducting workshops, issuing guidance and reports surveying best practices, and ongoing outreach meetings and presentations to industry members. The OCC’s supervisory priorities for the duration of the 2016 fiscal year include compliance, operational resiliency, credit risk management, stress testing, strategic planning and execution, corporate governance, and interest rate risk.
View the OCC’s mid-cycle status report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of Financial Policy and Research Renamed
05/11/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that the Office of Financial Policy and Research has been renamed as the Division of Financial Stability and designated as a division of the Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve economist Nellie Liang, who was appointed to establish the office in November 2010 will stay on as director. The Division of Financial Stability is responsible for the Federal Reserve’s work on financial stability, including coordinating its interagency and international work, and its role as a member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Financial Stability Board. According to the press release, the change reflects the growth in responsibilities and staffing of the Division.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on LCR Disclosure and Disclosure of Liquidity Risk Management
05/11/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on draft guidelines on liquidity coverage ratio disclosures, to complement the disclosure requirements of liquidity risk management under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR provides general disclosure framework for firms for each category of risk where liquidity risk should be considered. Disclosure of ratios and figures to regulators is required under the CRR, in particular, ratios and figures that provide external stakeholders with a comprehensive view of the firm’s management of risk. In January 2015 the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Act was published, specifying the LCR for credit institutions. The ratio targets ensure that credit institutions maintain an adequate level of liquidity buffer to cover net liquidity outflows in the context of stressed conditions over a period of thirty days. The EBA proposes these draft guidelines to harmonize and specify disclosures required under the general principles in the CRR on liquidity and LCR.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Sets Timeline for Provision of Advice to the European Commission on Review of EU Capital Requirements
05/11/2016
The European Banking Authority published a letter from it to the European Commission relating to the Calls for Advice on various aspects of the revised international regulatory capital requirements. The Commission has requested advice from the EBA on the revision of the own funds requirements for market risk, counterparty credit risk, exposures to CCPs, large exposures and the net stable funding requirement.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Announces Assessment of Four Banks in 2016
05/10/2016
The Banking Supervision division of the European Central Bank announced that it is currently undertaking comprehensive assessments of four European Banks. The banks being assessed are Abanka d.d. (Slovenia), Akciju sabiedrība "Rietumu Banka" (Latvia), Banca Mediolanum S.p.A. (Italy) and Citibank Europe Plc (Ireland). The assessments are being undertaken separately to the European Banking Authority stress test. The assessments commenced in March 2016 and the ECB expects results to be published in November 2016.
View the announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Seeks Feedback on Risks and Benefits of Modern Use of Consumer Data by Financial Institutions
05/04/2016
The European Banking Authority published a discussion paper on innovative uses of consumer data by financial institutions. The focus of the paper is the risks and benefits to consumers and financial institutions arising from the use of commercially available data. Recent innovations include financial institutions combining consumer data they hold internally with data sourced externally from private and public companies and social media. Financial institutions are able to use consumer data, such as buyer behavior, to provide incentives such as shopping discounts to increase consumer consumption of financial services. Benefits for consumers of such innovative usage may include cost reductions and improved quality in products and services offered as financial institutions can more accurately cater to customer needs. Financial institutions can benefit through the creation of new sources of revenue, achieved through better product and service development and sharing consumer data with third parties.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Bank of New York Executive Vice President Discusses Importance of Liquidity Regulations
05/04/2016
Executive Vice President of the US Federal Reserve Bank of New York Simon Potter discussed steps the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has taken to improve the US monetary policy framework following the financial crisis in line with its principles of returning to normalization. He discussed the importance of creating a framework that can provide liquidity for monetary policy implementation and transmission. However, Potter noted that there are important tradeoffs to consider, in that financial market participants may anticipate that central banks, like the Federal Reserve, will make liquidity abundant during times of stress and manage their own liquidity conservatively. He suggested that the Basel III liquidity regulations, namely the liquidity coverage ratio which the US has adopted and the net stable funding ratio which the Federal Reserve has recently proposed, help to mitigate the risk that banks would rely too much on the central bank for liquidity. Potter also noted the importance of the US monetary policy framework being transparent in order to enable market participants to make better-informed decisions. Specifically, drawing parallels to the financial crisis, he observed that a central bank can help foster the contribution of liquidity to the financial system by market participants by committing itself to maintain liquidity.
View Potter’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Release Notice of Proposed Net Stable Funding Ratio Rulemaking
05/03/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved a joint notice of proposed rulemaking to establish a net stable funding ratio in the US, in line with the framework previously established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation previously approved the rule on April 26, 2016. The net stable funding ratio would require covered institutions to maintain stable sources of funding, including capital and long-term debt, over a one-year horizon. Specifically, a covered company’s ratio of (i) “available stable funding,” a measure of the stability of its equity and liabilities over a one-year time horizon to (ii) “required stable funding,” a calculation made based upon the liquidity characteristics of the institution’s assets, derivative exposures and commitments over the same one-year horizon, must be at least 1.0. With respect to assets that qualify as “available stable funding,” asset categories are assigned an “available stable funding” (ASF) weight, with Tier 1 regulatory capital and Tier 2 capital instruments with a maturity of over one year receiving a 100% ASF weight, and trade date payables, certain short-term funding and certain short-term retail brokered deposits receiving a 0% ASF weight. The rule is aimed at reducing liquidity risk by ensuring that a covered institution retains sufficient liquid assets in the event of funding disruptions or a liquidity run in order to remain viable.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Revised Technical Standards on Additional Collateral Outflows under the Capital Requirements Regulation
05/03/2016
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the European Commission's intention not to endorse final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on additional collateral outflows, prepared under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The final draft RTS, submitted to the Commission in March 2014, set out the materiality and the measurement of additional collateral outflows resulting from the impact of an adverse market scenario on a firm's derivatives transactions, financing transactions and other contracts. The technical standards are also a component of the liquidity coverage ratio for which the final standards came into force at the end of 2015. The EBA's final draft RTS include a historical look-back approach (known as HLBA) method for calculating additional liquidity outflows corresponding to collateral needs resulting from the impact of an adverse market scenario on a firm's derivatives transactions, financing transactions and other contracts that was more conservative than that adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in April 2014. The European Commission, which delayed the assessment of the final draft RTS pending the adoption of the LCR RTS, requested the EBA to amend its final draft RTS on additional collateral outflows to align with the HBLA approach adopted by the Basel Committee on the basis that the liquidity outflows under the EBA's HBLA approach would be much higher for major players in the derivatives markets and that netting could be allowed as most collateral received by banks is in the form of cash or sovereign debt. The EBA agrees with the European Commission and has submitted revised final RTS to the Commission for endorsement.
View the Opinion and revised final draft RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Proposes Providing Securities Firms with Access to Discount Window
05/01/2016
Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley delivered remarks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 2016 Financial Markets Conference, focusing on the connection between liquidity and financial stability. Dudley first addressed market liquidity, noting that evidence that market liquidity has diminished is mixed. Turning to funding liquidity, Dudley emphasized the link between funding liquidity and capital requirements and asked whether more should be done to support funding liquidity. Dudley noted the importance of the availability of a lender-of-last resort, and remediating any gaps in the lender-of-last-resort function. As an example, Dudley noted the limited ability of the Federal Reserve Board to provide funding to a securities firm, even on a fully collateralized basis, and suggested that providing such firms with access to the Discount Window “might be worth exploring.” Dudley also noted that the Bank for International Settlement's Committee on the Global Financial System is engaged in a project to determine what lender-of-last-resort gaps currently exist, focusing, in particular, on those that may create vulnerability in terms of financial stability. One area that he anticipates will receive considerable attention is whether there are any gaps with respect to the activities of globally systemic firms that operate on a cross-border basis. He also noted that greater attention needs to be paid to the appropriate role for the home- versus host-country supervisor and that the regulatory and supervisory responses for large, systemically-important firms that operate on a cross-border basis need to be closely coordinated, especially during times of stress. Dudley stressed that expectations about who will be the lender-of-last-resort need to be well understood in both the home and host countries.
View the speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Consults on Reporting of Financial Statements and Forecast Capital Data
04/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on regulatory reporting of financial statements, forecast capital data and IFRS 9 requirements, setting out the PRA’s proposals on future reporting of balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and forecast capital data. The consultation paper is relevant to PRA-authorized banks, building societies and designated investment firms. It also outlines proposals for reporting of P&L data by non-EEA banks that are authorized to accept deposits through a branch in the United Kingdom. The proposals are part of the PRA’s execution of its strategy for the collection of valid, accurate and meaningful information, including a review of reporting requirements to assist the PRA in gaining the information required to engage in judgement-based supervision. Balance sheet and P&L data assist the PRA in its macro-prudential and monetary policy analysis. Responses to the consultation are due by July 29, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Guidance on Banks' Maintenance and Retention of Records and Examiner Access
04/27/2016
The OCC issued a bulletin reminding all OCC-supervised banks of their obligations to maintain and retain their records and the OCC’s authority to obtain prompt and complete access to each bank’s books and records and communicate freely with its employees, officers and directors. The guidance is being issued in response to the OCC’s discovery that certain communications technology being made available to banks contains data deletion and encryption features which could inhibit the OCC’s ability to access bank data and records. The guidance notes that the permanent deletion of internal communications is in conflict with the OCC’s expectations for sound governance, compliance, risk management and safety and soundness principles.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Adopts Final Rule to Amend How Small Banks are Assessed for Deposit Insurance
04/26/2016
The FDIC approved a final rule that amends how banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured for a minimum of five years are assessed for deposit insurance. The rule updates the data and revises the methodology that the FDIC uses to determine the risk-based assessments for such institutions. FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg anticipates that more than 93% of small banks will pay lower rates under the revised framework. The final rule will be used for rate determinations once the FDIC’s insurance fund reaches 1.15%, but not before the third quarter of 2016.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Regulatory Technical Standards for Disclosure of Encumbered and Unencumbered Assets
04/25/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on draft regulatory technical standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation on the disclosure of encumbered and unencumbered assets. The CRR requires the EBA to develop draft RTS to specify institutions’ disclosure of balance sheet value per exposure class broken down by asset quality and the total amount of the balance sheet value that is unencumbered. The draft RTS sets out the data required to be disclosed on encumbered and unencumbered assets, the format, and the timing of the publication. The EBA has developed the draft RTS to take into account the European Systematic Risk Board recommendations, which stated that the EBA and regulators should monitor the level, evolution and types of asset encumbrance. The EBA published its first report analyzing asset encumbrance in September 2015. The report revealed that there had been no increase in levels of asset encumbrance over the past four years. The ESRB further recommended that the EBA issue guidelines and harmonized templates and definitions on transparency requirements for credit institutions on asset encumbrance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Government Accountability Office Issues Report on Resolution Plan Review Process by US Regulators
04/25/2016
The US Government Accountability Office issued a report on the resolution plan review processes developed by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The report found that, although the resolution plan rule has improved the resolvability of large systemically important financial companies in the United States, the lack of transparency by US regulators regarding how the regulators assess and review plans could undermine public and market confidence in resolution plans.
Along with these findings, the GAO report issued a series of recommendations to improve the resolution review process. Among other recommendations, the GAO report encouraged the FDIC and Federal Reserve to publicly disclose information about their respective processes for assessing the credibility of resolution plans and revising the resolution plan rule’s filing requirements in order to provide companies with more time to respond to feedback and guidance from the regulators on their resolution plans.
View the GAO report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes First List of Other Systemically Important Institutions
04/25/2016
The European Banking Authority published the first list of Other Systemically Important Institutions in the European Union. O-SIIs are institutions which have been deemed by national regulators to be systemically relevant in addition to the Global Systemically Important Institutions that have already been identified. The EBA has compiled the list based on the findings of the relevant national regulators across the EU. National regulators relied on the EBA Guidelines on the identification of O-SIIs, which included recommended uniform criteria, including size, importance (substitutability or financial system infrastructure), complexity (or cross-border activities) and interconnectedness of such institutions. The EBA’s guidelines on the identification of O-SIIs were developed in accordance with the Capital Requirements Directive and on the basis of internationally agreed frameworks established by the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision. The EBA will publish an updated list of O-SIIs annually along with a revised definition of any CET1 capital buffer requirements set by national regulators.
View the list of O-SIIs.
View the EBA’s guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Erratum to Consultation on Basel III Leverage Ratio Framework Published
04/25/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published an erratum to its April 2016 consultation paper on proposed revisions to the Basel III leverage ratio framework. The proposals contained in the consultation paper include amendments to: (i) the measurement of derivative exposures by adopting a modified version of the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures; (ii) treatment of regular-way purchases and sales of financial assets so as to achieve consistency across accounting standards; (iii) treatments of provisions; and (iv) credit conversion factors for off-balance sheet items, by aligning them with the standardized approach to credit risk. In addition, the Basel Committee proposes to impose additional requirements on global systemically important banks, setting out various options, including whether the additional requirement should apply uniformly to all G-SIBs or be tailored and whether the form should be a higher minimum requirement or a buffer requirement. Responses to the consultation are still required by July 6, 2016. The Basel Committee intends to finalize the revised leverage ratio requirement in 2016 so as to allow time for its implementation by January 1, 2018.
View the erratum.
View the amended consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Requests European Banking Authority to Assist in its Review of EU Capital Requirements Regulation
04/22/2016
Two letters from Olivier Guersent DG FISMA of the European Commission to Andrea Enria, Chairperson of the European Banking Authority, on issues associated with its review of the Capital Requirements Regulation were published. The first letter, dated April 12, 2016, was in response to the EBAs report on net stable funding requirements under the CCR. The EBA report concluded that NSFR standards developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision fit well with the European banking framework but also flagged some European specificities. By the end of 2016, the Commission, if it deems appropriate, should submit a legislative proposal on the NSFR to the European Parliament and Council relying on the EBA Report when assessing the provisions of the Basel NSFR standard to ensure that a possible NSFR proposal does not hinder the financing of the real economy. The purpose of the letter is to request additional guidance on two areas of the EBA Report. First, with regards to the treatment of derivatives in the NSFR, the Commission is of the view that more specific analysis is required. The Commission expressed concern that the 20% required stable funding factor applied to gross derivatives liabilities and the recognition of margin received as compared to margin posts have not been comprehensively analyzed or subjected to the necessary extensive public consultation. Furthermore, the EBA should provide a complementary assessment on the impact of the provisions and an analysis of the impact on the treatment and calibration of derivatives.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Pre-announced Jurisdiction Buffer Decisions
04/21/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a list of jurisdiction specific pre-announced buffer decisions. In December, 2010, the Basel Committee published Basel III: a global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. As required under Basel III, this document outlines details of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity, including a countercyclical buffer. The countercyclical buffer regime will be phased-in in accordance with the capital conservation buffer between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 becoming fully effective on January 1, 2019. To assist in bank compliance, jurisdictions can pre-announce buffer levels when raising the countercyclical buffer up to 12 months in advance. A jurisdiction may also announce a decrease in the requisite countercyclical buffer, the effect of which is immediate. The list includes all Basel Committee member jurisdictions, their pre-announced buffer decisions, and the current buffers in place. Jurisdictions include Argentina, China, France, India, Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The updated list also includes buffer information on the non-member jurisdiction Norway.
View the update.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Holds Meeting of the Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee
04/14/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee held a meeting to discuss the latest updates and advice on issues related to the resolution of systemically important financial companies pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. At the meeting, the committee covered topics including, the “living will” updates, orderly liquidation updates, and developments in resolution planning in the European Union.
View the agenda for the Systemic Resolution Advisory Committee meeting.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Consultation on Guidelines for Prudential Treatment of Problem Assets
04/14/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation document on guidelines for the prudential treatment of problem assets focusing on credit categorization definitions. In the context of the financial crisis, the Basel Committee noted that credit categorization terms used by firms were not always clear and made it difficult to compare financial information. This contributed to increased uncertainty at the height of the crisis and undermined investor ability to assess bank performance and risk. Credit risk categorization is a tool used by banks when assessing the solvency and riskiness of banks’ credit risk exposures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Research Releases Brief Regarding Global Systemically Important Banks
04/13/2016
The US Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Research published a paper analyzing data on global systemically important banks, based on data released in 2013 and 2014 by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The OFR research report analyzed data regarding 30 banks across the world identified by the Basel Committee as G-SIBs, including eight US bank holding companies. The analysis found, among other things, an increase in the systemic importance scores by Chinese banks, while the systemic importance scores of US G-SIBs generally reflected little change and continued to be among the highest amongst global banks.
View the full text of the OFR report.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Supervisory Best Practices for Securitization
04/12/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report on supervisory measures taken by national regulators in 2014 on compliance by credit institutions and investments firms with securitization risk retention, due diligence and disclosure requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA is required to assess regulators' measures to ensure compliance. The report notes that firms are generally undertaking actions to comply with the requirements. Since the introduction of the requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive II in 2011, ten firms have been deemed non-compliant, with one firm receiving a sanction of an additional risk weight. The report provides analysis of how the EBA's recommendations on regulation of risk retention rules, due diligence and disclosure in the EU, as specified in a 2014 EBA report, have been taken on board in the legislative proposals for the new securitization framework issued by the European Commission as part of its Capital Markets Union initiative.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Issues Global Capital Index Update
04/12/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig issued the semi-annual update of the Global Capital Index, an index showing the capital ratios for global systemically important banks. Upon release of the update, Vice Chairman Hoenig noted that the loss-absorbing tangible capital levels of the largest US banks are increasing relative to their foreign counterparts. Vice Chairman Hoenig emphasized however that, although the update indicated the overall health of US banks, compared to foreign banks, progress must still continue to a point where banks maintain sufficient levels of tangible capital to effectively move the cost of downside risk from the public to the firms.
View the updated Global Capital Index.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Risk Appetite Statement
04/12/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released its Risk Appetite Statement, which documents the OCC’s overall conservative risk appetite in carrying out its supervisory mission. The Risk Appetite Statement provides that the OCC will accept more risk in some areas in order to adapt to the changing needs of supervised national banks and federal savings associations. OCC management and employees will use the statement to evaluate their decisions in overseeing national banks and federal savings associations as well as the execution of agency management functions, such as human resources, procurement and information technology.
Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry noted that by clearly articulating acceptable levels of risks within the OCC’s operations, agency personnel have “clearer signposts by which to guide their decisions and external stakeholders can better understand OCC actions in the context of the risks facing the agency.” The OCC plans to update its Risk Appetite Statement periodically as the federal banking system and its supervision evolve.
View the OCC’s Risk Appetite Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Corrigendum to Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions of Liquidity Coverage Arrangements
04/09/2016
A corrigendum relating to the format and frequency of the reporting of liquidity requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The corrigendum corrects numerical references to Annexes contained in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/322 relating to types of information to be reported and the instructions for reporting.
View the corrigendum.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Files Appeal to Metlife Decision
04/08/2016
The US Financial Stability Oversight Council filed its appeal to the DC District Court opinion overturning the FSOC’s designation of insurer MetLife as a systemically important financial institution. In the March 30, 2016 judicial opinion that was unsealed last week, US District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer called the FSOC’s determination process “fatally flawed” and “arbitrary and capricious,” ruling that the FSOC did not follow its own guidelines before deciding on the Metlife designation. US Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew has criticized the court’s ruling, arguing that by overturning the conclusions of experienced financial regulators, “the court imposed new requirements that Congress never enacted, and contradicted key policy lessons from the financial crisis.”
View the US District Court opinion.
View the statement from Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Proposes Technical Amendments to Risk-Based Capital Surcharge for Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies
04/07/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System proposed technical amendments to its rule requiring a risk-based capital surcharge for global systemically important bank holding companies. The rule, finalized by the Federal Reserve Board in July 2015, establishes the criteria for identifying a GSIB and the methodology a GSIB is required to use to determine its risk-based capital surcharge, which corresponds to the systemic risk of that firm.
The proposed amendments would not materially change the underlying final rule but rather clarify that GSIBs must continue to calculate their surcharges using year-end data, while their related surcharge data will be reported on a quarterly basis. The proposal explains that bank holding companies subject to the rule are required to compute their method 2 surcharge scores using systemic indicator amounts expressed in billions of dollars even though the data is reported in millions of dollars. The amendments also provide additional information on how GSIBs should calculate their short-term wholesale funding scores, which help to determine their surcharges, during the rule’s transition period.
Comments on the proposal are due by May 13, 2016.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release.
View the proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Report on Risks and Vulnerabilities in the EU Financial System
04/07/2016
The European Banking Authority, European Securities and Markets Authority and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (known as the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities) published a report identifying three main areas of risk and vulnerability affecting the stability of the EU financial system. The ESAs noted that investment funds had experienced markedly lower returns during the second half of 2015. The ESAs observed that the low interest rate environment coupled with high non-performing loans ratios in some countries, has contributed to the subdued profitability of banks in the EU. The report concludes that a proactive stance is required to address the high level of non-performing loans at some banks. The report highlighted the trend of increasing interconnectivity of bank and non-bank entities. The ESAs noted that interconnectedness could act as a potential channel for the propagation of shocks and thereby contribute to negative systematic events. The ESA recommends that the regulators should implement enhanced supervisory monitoring of concentration risks, cross-border exposures and regulatory arbitrage. The ESAs also highlights the risks associated with a potential contagion stemming from China and other emerging markets. Following a decade of strong contributions to global economic growth from emerging economies and China, the recent economic slowdown in these economies could have substantial effects on the EU in future. To forecast the risk in market exposure to these economies, the ESAs suggest that these markets should be covered in risk analysis exercises such as stress test exercises. Supervisors are also asked by the ESAs to carefully evaluate any optimistic assumptions relating to returns on cross border activity.
View ESA report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Gruenberg Remarks on Banking Industry Consolidation and the Prospect of De Novo Banks
04/06/2016
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg discussed the consolidation of community banks, noting that while many of the smallest (with assets less than $100 million) have either consolidated or ceased operations, the number of larger community banks (with assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion) has actually increased over the past 30 years. He further noted that approximately 93 percent of FDIC-insured institutions are considered “community banks” and play an important role in providing small loans to farms and businesses and deposit services to communities across the US. However, Gruenberg observed that community banks face many challenges including a decline in net interest margins.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Hoenig Discusses a Framework for Tailored Supervision
04/06/2016
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig discussed the decline of traditional community banks over the last thirty years and the resulting concentration of the US financial system in a few large financial firms. Hoenig outlined his recommendation of a model of regulatory relief that would provide greater flexibility to banks operating in the United States. Notably, Hoenig’s framework would abandon references to size thresholds, but would instead grant regulatory relief to banks that: (i) hold no trading assets or liabilities; (ii) hold no derivatives positions other than interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives; (iii) have a total notional value of all their derivatives exposures (including cleared and non-cleared derivatives) of less than $8 billion; and (iv) maintain a ratio of GAAP tangible equity-to-assets of at least 10 percent. He suggested that such banks should potentially be exempt from Basel capital standards, stress testing requirements, and certain reporting requirements.
View Vice Chairman Hoenig’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Issues Guidance on Basel Committee Consultation on Operational Risk Measurement
04/06/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System's Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation and Basel Coordination Committee issued a bulletin that provides supervisory guidance with respect to the issuance of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s second consultative paper published on March 4, 2016, “Standardised Measurement Approach for Operational Risk.”
The BCBS paper proposes certain revisions applicable to large, internationally active banking organizations, including a non-model-based method for calculating operational risk-weighted assets and a withdrawal of the advanced measurement approaches (AMA) for operational risk from the Basel capital framework. In its bulletin, the Federal Reserve Board states that it will consider the BCBS proposals in connection with the US advanced approaches risk-based capital rule in a manner consistent with the US notice and comment process, during which time the existing AMA capital requirements will remain in effect.
View the Federal Reserve Board guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Amendments to Approaches for Determining Proxy Spreads and Market Loss
04/06/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper proposing amendments to the regulatory technical standards for determining proxy spread and the specification of a limited number of smaller portfolios for credit valuation adjustment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. On February 25, 2015, the EBA published a report on the relevance of the RTS provisions. In particular, the EBA focused on a CVA data collection exercise of 32 banks from 11 jurisdictions. The EBA concluded, based on the collection exercise, that there were difficulties in determining appropriate proxy spreads and market loss given default for a large number of counterparties because spreads may never be observed on markets. The amending RTS provides alternative approaches for the purpose of identifying appropriate proxy spread and market loss given default, in response to the issues outlined in the previous EBA report. The consultation invites responses on whether the amendments address the issues raised in the previous EBA report and whether the amendments are needed. Responses to the consultation are due by July 6, 2016.
View the EBA consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Proposed Revisions to the Basel III Leverage Ratio Framework Published
04/06/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published proposals to revise the existing leverage ratio framework. The proposals include amendments to the : (i) measurement of derivative exposures by adopting a modified version of the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures; (ii) treatment of regular-way purchases and sales of financial assets so as to achieve consistency across accounting standards; (iii) treatment of provisions; and (iv) credit conversion factors for off-balance sheet items by aligning them with the standardized approach to credit risk. In addition, the Basel Committee proposes to impose additional requirements on global systemically important banks, setting out options, including whether the additional requirement should apply uniformly to all G-SIBs or be tailored and whether the form should be a higher minimum requirement or a buffer requirement. Responses to the consultation are due by July 6, 2016. The Basel Committee intends to finalize the revised leverage ratio requirement in 2016 so as to allow time for its implementation by January 1, 2018.
View the consultation paper.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Proposes New Data Items for Regulatory Reporting by Foreign Banking Organizations
04/04/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System proposed changes to various reporting forms, including FR Y-7N, FR Y‑7NS and FR Y-7Q, requiring collection of fourteen new data items to monitor compliance with enhanced prudential standards for foreign banking organizations. The new data items, adopted pursuant to Subparts N and O of Regulation YY, would be used to determine whether an FBO with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more meets capital adequacy standards at the consolidated parent company level that are consistent with the Basel capital framework.
The proposed revisions would be effective September 30, 2016, and, for certain items, March 31, 2018. Comments to the Federal Reserve Board proposal are due by June 3, 2016.
View the proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Rules Allowing Certain Municipal Securities to be Counted as High-Quality Liquid Assets
04/01/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released a final rule that would permit certain US general obligation state and municipal securities to count towards the high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) that large banking organizations may use to satisfy the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) requirement. The LCR, as adopted by the federal banking agencies in September 2014, requires large banking organizations to hold a minimum amount of HQLA no less than their total net cash outflow amount over a 30-day forward-looking period of significant financial stress. Specifically, the final rule allows certain investment-grade, US general obligation state and municipal securities to qualify as HQLA up to certain levels if they meet the same liquidity criteria that currently apply to corporate debt securities. Although the LCR rule did not initially allow US municipal securities to be treated as HQLA, the Federal Reserve noted that subsequent analysis suggested that certain US municipal securities should qualify as HQLA because they have liquidity characteristics similar to other classes of HQLA, including corporate debt securities, and thus should receive similar treatment. The rule goes into effect on July 1, 2016. While the US LCR rule was an interagency rulemaking with substantively identical rules implemented by the Federal Reserve, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, neither the OCC nor the FDIC issued a similar rule with respect to the treatment of municipal securities as HQLA.
View the Final Rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Releases Report on Organization of Global Banks
04/01/2016
In early April, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York released a staff report entitled “Organizational Complexity and Balance Sheet Management in Global Banks,” which analyzes the evolution of banks from standalone institutions to being subsidiaries of complex financial conglomerates. The paper suggests the organizational complexity of the family of a bank is a fundamental driver of the business model of the bank itself, as reflected in the management of the bank’s own balance sheet. Based on microdata on global banks with branch operations in the United States, the report shows that branches of conglomerates in more complex families have a markedly lower lending sensitivity to funding shocks. The balance sheet management strategies of banks are very much determined by the structure of the organizations the banks belong to and the complexity of the conglomerate can change the scale of the lending channel for a large global bank by more than 30 percent.
View the New York Fed staff report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Staff Working Paper Concludes Both Capital and Liquidity Need to be Regulated
04/01/2016
In early April, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System's Divisions of Research and Statistics and Monetary Affairs released a staff working paper entitled “Bank Regulation under Fire Sale Externalities,” addressing the optimal design of, and interaction between, capital and liquidity regulations in a model characterized by fire sale externalities. In particular, the authors analyze whether it suffices to introduce capital regulations alone and let banks freely choose their liquidity ratios or whether liquidity also needs to be regulated. The results of the study indicate that the pre-Basel III regulatory framework, with its reliance only on capital requirements, was inefficient and ineffective in addressing systemic instability caused by fire sales. The paper notes that capital requirements can lead to less severe fire sales by forcing banks to reduce risky assets, however, it also shows that banks respond to stricter capital requirements by decreasing their liquidity ratios. Anticipating this response, the regulator preemptively sets capital ratios at high levels and ultimately, this interplay between banks and the regulator leads to inefficiently low levels of risky assets and liquidity. The paper concludes that macroprudential liquidity requirements that complement capital regulations, as in Basel III, restore constrained efficiency, improve financial stability and allow for a higher level of investment in risky assets.
View the Federal Reserve Board staff working paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Second Report on Risk-weighted Assets
04/01/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a second report on banking book risk-weighted asset valuation. The report forms part of the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme with the aim of effecting full implementation of the Basel III framework. The Committee's first report in 2013 focused on probability of default and loss-given-estimates for sovereign, bank and corporate exposures. This second report examines the variability of RWA in banks that use internal models to calculate their risk regulatory capital requirements.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Securities and Markets Authority Joins European Banking Authority in Call for Legislative Changes on Application of Remuneration Requirements
03/31/2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority published its final report on Guidelines on the sound remuneration policies under the Units in Collective Undertakings Directive and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, including the final Remuneration Guidelines under UCITS V and revised Remuneration Guidelines under the AIFMD. ESMA also published a letter addressed to the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union in which ESMA recommends that legislation is required to provide clarity on the application of the proportionality principle to the remuneration requirements under EU laws.
-
EU Technical Standards on Leverage Ratio Reporting
03/31/2016
A Commission Implementing Regulation which amends implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting of institutions as regards the reporting of the leverage ratio, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The ITS amends the requirement to report the leverage ratio to regulators under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The amending ITS updates prescribed notional values for institutions and derivatives traded to which certain reporting requirements are attached. The amending ITS provides updated leverage reporting ratio templates and instructions for completing the templates. The amending ITS enters into force on April 20, 2016. The regulation shall apply from the first reporting reference date six months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
View the ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Proposes Standards for Underwriting Buy-to-Let Mortgages
03/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published proposals on minimum standards for firms when underwriting buy-to-let contracts. The proposals would apply to all PRA-regulated firms undertaking buy-to-let lending that are not subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. The PRA is proposing that such firms be required to use an affordability test when assessing a buy-to-let mortgage contract as an interest coverage ratio test and/or an income affordability test. In addition, a standard set of variables would be established that would need to be shown in the tests.
In addition, the PRA has proposed clarification on the application of the small and medium-sized enterprise supporting factor on buy-to-let mortgages which would apply to all firms subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation. Under the CRR, the SME supporting factor is used to reduce the capital requirements on loans to SMEs on qualifying retail, corporate and real estate exposures. The PRA's view is that buy-to-let borrowing is not included in that reduction and the PRA expects firms to consider the purpose of a loan before applying the SME supporting factor. The consultation closes on June 29, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK 2016 Banking Stress Test Launched
03/29/2016
The Bank of England released details of the UK 2016 banking stress test, the first to be designed under the new approach to stress testing published in October 2015. The 2016 stress test will cover seven UK banks and building societies: Barclays plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Nationwide Building Society, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, Santander UK plc and Standard Chartered plc. These are the same firms that participated in the 2015 stress test. The stress test will consist of a macroeconomic stress scenario, a traded-risk stress scenario, a misconduct costs stress and an annual cyclical scenario. The results of the stress test will be published in Q4 2016.
View details of the UK 2016 stress test.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Countercyclical Buffer Rate Increased from 2017
03/29/2016
The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England published a Statement from its policy meeting on March 23, 2016. The Statement summarizes the conclusions reached by the FPC. The FPC has decided to increase the UK countercyclical buffer rate from 0% of risk-weighted assets to 0.5% with effect from March 29, 2017. The current overlapping aspects of Pillar 2 supervisory capital buffers will be reduced at the same time as a one-off adjustment. The UK CCyB rate will apply to all UK banks and building societies as well as investment firms not exempted by the Financial Conduct Authority. According to the rules of the European Systemic Risk Board, this buffer will also apply to EU banks lending into the UK either on a cross-border basis or through a local branch. The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Statement clarifying its approach to adjustments to firms' buffers as the CCyB, systemic and conservation buffers are implemented up to 2019. The PRA intends to ensure that the supervisory buffers will be reduced as soon as practicable after the CCyB rate comes into effect which will depend on the timing of a firm's supervisory review and evaluation process. The adjustments aim to ensure that the transition to the new capital framework avoids double counting in capital buffers covering the same risk and give firms time to transition to the requisite capital buffers by the end of 2019.
The FPC will also assess the implementation and design of internationally-agreed post-crisis regulations to determine whether liquidity could be enhanced. The outcome of that assessment is expected later in 2016.
View the FPC Statement.
View the PRA Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Proposes Amendments to the Internal Rating Based Approach
03/24/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision launched a consultation on changes to the advanced internal ratings based approach and the foundation IRB approach so as to reduce variation in capital requirements for credit risk. The Basel Committee is proposing to: (i) remove the IRB approaches for certain portfolios which will then be subject to the standardized approach to credit risk; (ii) remove the option to use the advanced IRB approach for exposures to corporates that are part of consolidated groups that have annual revenues of more than EUR 200m; (iii) remove the IRB approaches for specialized lending that use banks' estimates of model parameters; and (iv) introduce a floor to the internal model method for counterparty credit risk based on a percentage of the applicable standardized approach. The consultation closes on June 24, 2016. The Basel Committee has committed to finalizing all the proposed changes to the IRB approaches by the end of 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Regulation Harmonizes Options and Discretions Applicable to Large Eurozone Banks
03/24/2016
The European Central Bank Regulation on the exercise of options and discretions relating to the prudential requirements for credit institutions was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The prudential treatment of options and discretions by regulators is outlined in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation, known collectively as CRD IV. The ECB is the prudential regulator for Eurozone banks and directly supervises the large Eurozone banks under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, designated as "significant credit institutions". The ECB Regulation sets out the waivers, options and discretions that the ECB has decided to apply to significant credit institutions in its capacity as the prudential regulator of these firms, and which will replace those adapted by the national regulators. The waivers and discretion cover own funds, capital requirements, liquidity and large exposures. The ECB Regulation will apply, subject to limited exceptions, from October 1, 2016, although transitional provisions have been included so that existing national provisions will apply until the ECB sets a common approach for those waivers and discretions not covered in this Regulation. The ECB also published its Guide to harmonizing the exercise of options and discretions regarding the prudential supervision of credit institutions.
View the ECB Regulation.
View the ECB Guide.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Supporting Factor
03/23/2016
The European Banking Authority published a report on the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Supporting Factor. The SME SF was introduced by the Capital Requirements Regulation to counterbalance the rise in capital requirements resulting from the Capital Conservative Buffer whilst providing an adequate flow of credit to SMEs. The report provides: (i) analysis of the lending trends and conditions for SMEs; (ii) analysis of the effective riskiness of EU SMEs over a full economic cycle; and (iii) the consistency of funds requirements laid down in the CRR for credit risk to SME's. The EBA has concluded that there is currently not enough evidence to suggest that the SME SF has provided additional stimulus for lending to SMEs as compared to larger corporate entities. However, the EBA has also recognised that it may be too early to make strong conclusions based on the current analysis. The EBA makes four recommendations: (i) continued monitoring and a reassessment of the SME SF so as to understand its impact on lending; (ii) a more comprehensive approach for the review of risk weights; (iii) review of the amount owed limit criterion and in the application of the SME SF to understand its purpose and costs of application; and (iv) harmonisation of the SME definition in the CRR.
View the EBA's Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consultation on Reporting Financial Information Using GAAP
03/23/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on reporting financial information across EU jurisdictions using national Financial Supervisory Reporting Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP). The EBA reported that institutions across the EU have identified issues with current templates. The consultation has been decentralised so that all questions and feedback on the draft template are provided to jurisdiction specific Regulators and not through the EBA. The EBA believes it will benefit from the expertise of authorities from different jurisdictions given their knowledge of the local GAAP. The consultation follows from a previous consultation in December, 2015, on proposed changes to the FINREP based on the IFRS 9 requirements. Responses to the consultation are due by April 15, 2016. The EBA stated that it will release a subsequent updated version of the FINREP.
View the EBA press release.
View the draft FINREP GAAP template.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Extension of Exemption for Commodity Dealers Confirmed
03/23/2016
The European Council announced that it had agreed to extend an exemption for commodity dealers under the Capital Requirements Regulation, until December 31, 2020. The CRR currently exempts commodity dealers from large exposures requirements and own fund requirements until December 31, 2017. That date was set on the basis that the Commission would have conducted a review of the prudential regime applicable to commodity dealers and to investment firms by the end of 2015 and, if appropriate, proposed a legislative regime adapted for the risk profile of commodity dealers and investment firms. The Commissions' review is still in progress. The European Commission published its proposed legislative amendments to the CRR in December 2015 on the basis that the extension will avoid the need for relevant firms to temporarily comply with the full CRR requirements in 2018 before being subsequently moved to a tailored regime within two to three years.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Changes to Calculation of Interest Rate Risk on Capital Requirements
03/22/2016
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on standardised methods to compute capital requirements for general interest rate risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR provides for two standardised methods, the so-called Maturity-Based calculation for general interest risk and the Duration-Based calculation of general risk. The Duration-Based calculation uses the concept of Modified Duration which is valid only for instruments not subject to repayment risk. Modified Duration is used to measure the sensitivity in price for a unit change in its internal rate of return of any financial asset that consists of fixed cash flows. A correction to the duration is necessary to reflect the repayment risk. The CRR provides the mandate for the EBA to issue guidelines on how the Modified Duration for debt instruments which are subject to repayment risk should be corrected. The EBA proposes two approaches to correct the Modified Duration calculation: (i) treat the debt instrument with repayment risk as if it was a combination of a plain vanilla bond and an embedded bond; or (ii) calculate directly the change in value of the whole instrument subject to repayment risk resulting from a 100 basis point movement in Interest Rates. Submissions to the consultation are due by June 22, 2016.
View the Consultation Paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Approves Application by Goldman Sachs Bank USA to Acquire Deposits
03/21/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved the application by Goldman Sachs Bank USA under the Bank Merger Act to assume substantially all (approximately $17 billion) of the deposit liabilities and certain assets of GE Capital Bank, a subsidiary of General Electric Corporation, including assets GE Bank uses to manage its online deposit-taking platform. The acquisition was announced in August 2015, and the Federal Reserve Board extended processing of GS Bank’s application in light of numerous public comments that challenged the transaction on various grounds, including that GS is already too big to fail. In approving the transaction, among other findings, the Federal Reserve Board concluded that the transaction would have a negligible impact on the systemic footprint of GS (which has approximately $860 billion in total assets) and would improve the stability of funding available to GS Bank by diversifying its sources of funding.
View the Federal Reserve Board order.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Senior Officials of US Bank Regulatory Agencies Deliver Remarks Regarding Bank Supervisory Process
03/18/2016
As part of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Conference on Bank Supervision, senior officials of several US bank regulatory agencies delivered remarks regarding the effectiveness of bank supervision and key components of the bank supervisory process. In the conference’s opening remarks, NY Fed President William Dudley noted the importance of distinguishing between effective and ineffective supervision, particularly given the confidential nature of the bank supervisory process. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig subsequently noted several critical features of successful oversight of financial institutions including: (i) subjecting commercial banks of all sizes to full-scope examinations, (ii) having regulators require that the largest banks disclose important supervisory findings to allow the public to better understand their financial condition and (iii) recognition by supervisors of their limits and emphasizing that banks hold sufficient capital to backstop management mistakes and bad luck.
View President Dudley’s speech.
View Vice Chairman Hoenig’s speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Approves Rule to Increase Deposit Insurance Fund to Required Minimum Level
03/15/2016
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted a final rule to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund to the statutorily required minimum level of 1.35 percent. Subject to certain minor changes, the rule largely mirrors the proposed rule, which was published for comment in November.The primary purposes of the DIF are to protect the depositors of insured banks and to resolve failed banks. The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum for the DIF reserve ratio, the ratio of the amount in the fund to insured deposits, from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent and required that the ratio reach that level by September 30, 2020. The reserve ratio at the end of 2015 was 1.11 percent, with a DIF balance of $72.6 billion.
The DIF is funded mainly through quarterly assessments on insured banks. Pursuant to a 2011 FDIC rule, regular assessment rates for all banks will decrease when the reserve ratio reaches 1.15 percent, which the FDIC anticipates will occur in the first half of 2016. Banks with total assets of less than $10 billion will have substantially lower assessment rates under the 2011 rule. The final rule will impose on banks with at least $10 billion in assets a surcharge of 4.5 cents per $100 of their assessment base, after making certain adjustments. The FDIC expects the reserve ratio will likely reach 1.35 percent after approximately two years of payments of the surcharges.
The final rule will become effective on July 1. If the reserve ratio reaches 1.15 percent before that date, surcharges will begin July 1. If the reserve ratio has not reached 1.15 percent by that date, surcharges will begin the first quarter after the reserve ratio reaches 1.15 percent.
View the final rule. Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Dodd-Frank Act Criticized at American Bankers' Association Conference
03/15/2016
At an American Bankers’ Association Conference in Washington, DC, US Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby and US House of Representatives Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling both raised concerns regarding the current regulatory regime and certain requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Among other things, Chairman Shelby addressed the costs and burdens of financial regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act, specifically criticizing the $50 billion threshold for identifying systemically important financial institutions, and noted plans to continue to push his regulatory relief bill, The Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015, through the Senate. Chairman Hensarling also outlined proposed legislation that would reform the Dodd-Frank Act, including eliminating certain Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III requirements for banks that hold higher levels of capital.
View Chairman Shelby’s remarks.
View coverage of Chairman Hensarling’s remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Proposes Reducing Regulatory Burden
03/14/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would remove outdated or unnecessary provisions of certain OCC rules to reduce the regulatory burden on national banks and federal savings associations subject to the rules. The proposed rulemaking is part of the OCC’s review of its rules required by the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA) every ten years. The proposed rule was developed following outreach to the industry conducted by the OCC individually and in connection with other US banking regulators. The proposed rule would make the following changes to OCC rules, among others: remove notice and approval requirements for certain changes in permanent capital involving national banks; remove certain financial disclosure requirements for national banks and remove certain unnecessary regulatory reporting, accounting and management policy requirements for federal savings associations. The proposed rule is open for comment for 60 days.
View proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Launches Proposals for a Revised Pillar 3 Disclosure Framework
03/11/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision launched a proposed consolidated and enhanced framework for Pillar 3 disclosures under Basel III. The Basel Committee announced in June 2014 that it was undertaking a review of Pillar 3. In January, it issued its revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements, completing the first phase of the review.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Standards on Supervisory Reporting Requirements for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Published
03/10/2016
Commission Implementing Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which amends the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting by providing for significant changes to the existing Liquidity Coverage Ratio reporting requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The amending ITS introduce the templates and a large number of new data items necessary following the LCR requirements being implemented for credit institutions in January 2015. The European Banking Authority published its final draft amending ITS in June 2015. The changes include new templates and instructions for banks on capturing and reporting all necessary LCR items. The new templates cover liquid assets, outflows, inflows, collateral swaps and calculation of the LCR. The new instructions will only apply to banks; investment firms will continue to use current instructions and templates, at least for now. The amended ITS on supervisory reporting will apply from September 10, 2016.
View the amending ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of Financial Research Publishes Working Paper on the Impact of Counterpart Defaults on the Banking System
03/08/2016
The US Office of Financial Research (OFR) published a working paper using data on the credit default swap (CDS) market to assess the impact of a counterparty default on banks and the financial system as a whole. Using data from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, the paper applies the supervisory scenarios of the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) to CDS markets as a proxy for banks’ trading books. The working paper finds that the indirect effects of the default of a bank’s largest counterparty on the bank’s other counterparties are more significant than the impact on the bank itself. Moreover, the paper finds that, when looking at the financial system as a whole, banks may realize greater losses from the failure of a counterparty shared by the industry when compared to losses from the failure of the individual bank’s largest counterparty. The report concludes that CCAR does not take into account the losses that occur to other counterparties of a banking organization as a result of the default of its largest counterparty, nor does it take into account the large counterparty exposures that exist for the core financial system as a whole.
View working paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Proposes Amendments to the EU Standards on Supervisory Reporting
03/08/2016
The European Banking Authority published final draft Implementing Technical Standards to amend the ITS on supervisory reporting under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The amending ITS make changes to the reporting templates and instructions in Annexes I to VII and IX of the ITS on supervisory reporting which cover financial reporting, solvency (own funds requirements), large exposures and losses resulting from lending collateralized by immovable property. Given the scope of the changes, the EBA is proposing to replace entirely the affected annexes. The EBA considers that the amendments are necessary to align the ITS with the answers in the Single Rulebook Q&As, to correct legal references and a few clerical errors. There has been no public consultation on the proposed changes. The amending ITS will need to be approved by the European Commission, European Parliament and Council of the European Union before they can come into effect. The EBA expects that the amendments will be applicable from the December 31, 2016 reporting reference date.
View the amending ITS.
View the revised annexes and the annexes in tracked changes.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England on EU Membership and its Statutory Objectives
03/07/2016
An open letter from Mark Carney, Governor, Bank of England, to Andrew Tyrie, Chairman, Treasury Select Committee, on the effect of UK's EU membership on the Bank of England's statutory objectives was published. The letter was in response to the Committee's request for comment on the recent settlement agreement between the UK and the EU. The letter summarizes the findings that were made in a BoE report and the possible future impact of the settlement agreement. The BoE's primary objectives are monetary and financial stability. The three main areas in which the BoE's objectives are currently effected by EU membership are: (i) it provides dynamism in the UK economy through increased economic and financial openness; (ii) it increases the UK’s exposure to economic and financial shocks from other nations, in particular the EU; and (iii) the BoE is required to implement EU law, regulations and directives in its regulations and policy instruments. Mr Carney concludes that the settlement agreement provides a number of protections and additional tools that would protect the BoE's ability to achieve its statutory objectives. Implementation of the settlement agreement, through changes to various EU regulations and directives, is proposed to take place only if the outcome of the UK referendum on EU membership (so called "Brexit") is a vote to remain. The referendum is scheduled for June 23, 2016.
View the letter.
View the settlement agreement.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Amendments to EU Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting Published
03/05/2016
Commission Implementing Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which amends the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting by providing for additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation, banks are subject to liquidity reporting requirements. To increase effective liquidity supervision, the amended ITS provide for additional monitoring metrics to enhance regulator's view of a bank's liquidity position, proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the bank's activities. Additional monitoring metrics to be reported now include those metrics based on the concentration of funding by counterparty and product type and metrics based on the concentration of counterbalancing capacity by issuer or counterparty. In addition, the frequency of reporting can be reduced, depending on the nature of the bank. The amended ITS enters into force on March 25, 2016.
View the Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Issue Volcker Rule FAQ to Clarify Capital Treatment of Qualifying TruPS CDO
03/04/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (VR Agencies) issued a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) to clarify the capital treatment of certain collateralized debt obligations backed by trust preferred securities (TruPS CDOs). Specifically, the FAQ clarified that a banking entity is not required to deduct from its tier 1 capital a qualifying TruPS CDO that is retained under section 248.16(a) of the January 2014 interim final rule published by the VR Agencies. The January 2014 interim final rule provides an exemption that would permit a banking entity to retain an interest in, or act as sponsor of, a covered fund that issues TruPS CDOs subject to certain requirements, including that the issuer must have been established prior to May 19, 2010, and the banking entity’s interest must have been acquired on or before December 10, 2013. However, a banking entity would be required to deduct from tier 1 capital its interests in qualifying TruPS CDOs when it acts as a market maker for the interests of such TruPS CDOs and investments in TruPS CDOs that are covered funds but are otherwise not qualifying TruPS CDOs.
View the FAQ.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sytem Re-Proposes Single Counterparty Credit Limits for Large US Bank Holding Companies and Foreign Banking Organizations
03/04/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System re-proposed rules that would establish single counterparty credit limits for domestic and foreign bank holding companies, as well as US intermediate holding companies, with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets. The Federal Reserve also released a quantitative impact study that sets out the conceptual and quantitative foundations for the tighter limits on exposures between systemically important financial institutions. The proposed rule implements section 165(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act which authorizes the Federal Reserve to establish limits on the amount of credit exposure that large domestic banking organizations, foreign banking organizations and US intermediate holding companies (covered institutions) can have to a single unaffiliated counterparty in order to limit the risks in the event of a failure at any such individual firm. The proposed rule builds on earlier proposals for single counterparty credit limits for domestic and foreign banking organizations issued by the Federal Reserve in December 2011 and December 2012 and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s 2014 large exposures framework. Comments on the proposed rule are due by June 3, 2016.
View proposed rule.
View quantitative impact study.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Proposed Amendments to Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting
03/04/2016
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on proposed amendments to the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting to incorporate the new requirements for prudent valuation reporting and supplementary requirements for reporting of credit risk information. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation, firms are subject to requirements on prudent valuation adjustments of fair-valued positions. The Regulatory Technical Standards on prudent valuation came into force on February 16, 2016 and cover the methodology for calculating Additional Valuation Adjustments, consideration to be given to available market data and the simplified and core approaches for the determination of AVA. According to the EBA, the entry into force of the RTS justifies more detailed reporting requirements for prudent valuation than have been required to date. In addition, the EBA is proposing that firms report credit risk on a total level as well as on a country level only. Responses to the consultation are due by March 30, 2016.
View the EBA consultation paper.
View the ITS on supervisory reporting.
View the RTS on prudent valuation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Proposes New Approach to Operational Risk
03/04/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published proposals to revise the standards for operational risk for internationally active banks. The Basel Committee consulted in 2014 on a revised Standardized Approach to operational risk and simultaneously undertook a review of the Advanced Measurement Approach for operational risk. The Basel Committee is proposing to replace the AMA from the Basel framework as well as the three existing Standardized Approaches with a Standardized Measurement Approach. The new SMA is not based on any modelling and would set a standardized approach for measuring operational risk for regulatory capital purposes which would include risk sensitivity by using a bank's financial statement information and its internal loss experience. The Basel Committee introduced the AMA for operational risk in 2006 as part of the Basel II framework. The AMA allows regulatory capital to be estimated using a range of internal modelling practices subject to approval by the bank's regulator. Comments on the proposals are due by June 3, 2016. The Basel Committee intends to provide further details on the timeline for withdrawal of the AMA and implementation of the SMA during the course of 2016.
View th consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Issue Interagency Guidance on Funds Transfer Pricing Related to Funding and Contingent Liquidity Risks
03/01/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued interagency guidance on funds transfer pricing (FTP) practices related to funding risk and contingent liquidity risk for large financial institutions (i.e., domestic institutions with $250 billion or more in assets and foreign institutions with $250 billion or more in US assets). The interagency guidance describes four overarching principles that banks should use to develop, implement and maintain an effective FTP framework: (i) allocate FTP costs and benefits on funding risk and contingent liquidity risk; (ii) have a consistent and transparent FTP framework for identifying and allocating FTP costs and benefits on a timely basis and at a sufficiently granular level, commensurate with the firm’s size, complexity, business activities and overall risk profile; (iii) have a robust FTP governance structure including the production of a report on FTP and oversight from a senior management group and central management function; and (iv) align business incentives with risk management and strategic objectives by incorporating FTP costs and benefits into product pricing, business metrics and new product approval. The guidance notes that an institution’s FTP framework should be adequately tailored to its size, complexity, business activities and overall risk profile.
View interagency guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Annual Assessment of EU Supervisory Colleges
03/01/2016
The European Banking Authority published its report on the functioning of supervisory colleges in 2015. The report sets out the EBA's annual assessment of how well the supervisory colleges have met the action plan for 2015. The EU supervisory colleges make joint decisions on capital, liquidity and recovery plans for EU cross-border banking groups. The EBA considers that, generally, there were significant improvements, particularly when it came to the reorganization of supervisory colleges following the introduction of the Single Supervisory Mechanism in 2014, the frequency of interaction and the quality of supervisory colleges. However, the EBA notes that some areas still require work, such as the joint decision processes, quality of joint decision documents and requests for individual recovery plans outside the joint decision process. The report also includes the EBA's action plan for supervisory colleges in 2016. The plan sets out the focus areas for supervisory colleges which are: on going balance sheet cleaning, reduction of non-performing loans for legacy portfolios, the sustainability of banks' business models, conduct risk and IT risk.
View the EBA's Report. -
US Federal Banking Agencies Jointly Issue Interim Final Rules to Expand Exam Cycle for Smaller Banks and Branches
02/29/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation jointly issued and requested public comment on interim final rules to implement section 83001 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, or FAST Act, which permitted the agencies to expand the on-site examination schedule for qualifying insured depository institutions with less than $1 billion in total assets to once every 18 months from once every 12 months. The interim final rules make parallel changes to the regulations of the federal agencies regarding on-site examination cycles for US branches and agencies of foreign banks with total assets of less than $1 billion. Under the interim final rules, the number of institutions that may qualify for an expanded 18-month examination cycle increased by 617, to close to 5,000 banks and savings associations. In addition, the number of US branches and agencies of foreign banks that may qualify for the 18-month examination cycle increased by 26 branches and agencies to a 89 branches and agencies. The interim final rules are effective on February 29, 2016. Comments on the rules must be received by April 29, 2016.
View the full text of the rules.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Revised Process for Administrative Enforcement Actions of Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering Requirements
02/29/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published a bulletin summarizing its process for initiating and proceeding with any enforcement action for noncompliance with Bank Secrecy Act compliance program requirements or repeated or uncorrected BSA compliance problems. The OCC bulletin supplements the “Interagency Statement on Enforcement of Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering Requirements” and rescinds OCC Bulletin 2005-45, “Process for Taking Administrative Enforcement Actions Against Banks Based on BSA Violations,” dated December 23, 2005. The revised OCC bulletin describes the OCC’s process for conducting administrative enforcement actions based on BSAcompliance issues, which, in each case, begins with a cease-and-desist order issued by the OCC. Pursuant to the OCC bulletin, the enforcement action process now includes a provision which requires the OCC to give any bank investigated by the OCC for noncompliance with BSA or anti-money laundering requirements an opportunity to respond before the
decision to issue a cease-and-desist order is finalized. In each case, the OCC will notify the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of all formal and informal enforcement actions.
View the OCC bulletin.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulators Will Not Apply Bonus Cap Requirements to Smaller Firms
02/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority jointly announced that they will comply with all aspects of the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies published in December 2015, save for the approach related to the Bonus Cap. The Bonus Cap approach relates to provisions that establish that the limit on awarding variable remuneration to 100% of fixed remuneration, or 200% with shareholder approval must be applied to all firms subject to the Capital Requirements Directive. The PRA and FCA favor a risk-based approach in the application of the Bonus Cap, which under CRD principles allows for firms to comply in a way that is proportionate and appropriate to the firm's size, internal organisation, nature, scope and complexity of business. As the EBA Guidelines represent an interpretation of the CRD with which the PRA and FCA do not agree, the PRA and FCA will continue to use the current approach which requires smaller firms to determine an appropriate ratio between fixed and variable remuneration. The Guidelines are applicable to banks and investment firms and cover all staff, with particular aspects focusing on staff whose professional activities have a material impact on a firm's risk profile. The Guidelines set out detailed requirements for remuneration policies and related governance arrangements for implementing remuneration policies and apply from January 1, 2017.
View the EBA's Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies.
View the PRA and FCA's joint statement. -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Revised Policies on Civil Money Penalties
02/26/2016The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published revisions to its policy for assessing civil money penalties as set forth in its Policies and Procedures Manual. The revised PPM, titled “Civil Money Penalties,” replaces the PPM of the same title issued in June 1993. The revised PPM sets forth the OCC’s policies and procedures when assessing civil money penalties against entities such as institution-affiliated parties, national banks, federal savings associations, federal branches and agencies, and bank service companies and service providers.
View the full text of the OCC PPM.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Finalizes Rules on Internal Governance for Third Country Branches
02/26/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a final Policy Statement, Supervisory Statement and Rules for the internal governance of branches of non-EEA banks and PRA-designated investment firms. The PRA consulted in 2015 on its proposed changes, which centre around creating a separate PRA Rulebook. These changes follow the split of the Financial Services Authority into the PRA and the FCA, after which the PRA inherited materials from the FSA to create a Rulebook which contains only PRA rules. The new Rules and Supervisory Statement set out how third country branches should comply with PRA requirements for internal governance of third country branches and cover general organizational requirements, responsibility of personnel, skills, knowledge and expertise of individuals, risk control, outsourcing and record keeping. The PRA has also aligned the final Rules and Supervisory Statement with the requirements for third country branches under the Senior Manager and Certification Regimes. The Rules on internal governance of third country firms will apply from March 7, 2016, the same date from which the SM&CR applies for all firms.
View the PRA's Policy Statement.
View the PRA's Supervisory Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Payment Systems Regulator Report into Banks and UK Payment Infrastructure
02/25/2016
The Payment Systems Regulator published an interim report following its market review into bank ownership and payment infrastructure competitiveness in the UK. The PSR's motivation to conduct the review stems from its statutory objective to promote competition and innovation in the market for payment systems and the services that the systems provide. The Report outlines the PSR's provisional finding that there is no effective competition in the central payment infrastructure market.
Read More. -
European Banking Authority Launches EU-Wide Stress Test
02/24/2016
The European Banking Authority has launched the next round of EU-wide bank stress tests and released the associated methodology and macroeconomic scenarios for its application. The test will involve a sample of 51 EU banks, covering 70% of the region's banking sector. The purpose of the test is to provide a common analytical framework for supervisors, banks and other market participants to assess and compare the stress of EU banks when faced with economic shocks. The common methodology of the test is to assess solvency and the main types of risk faced by EU banks: credit and securitization, market, sovereign, funding and operational and conduct risk. The adverse scenario posed by the test highlights the most material threats to the stability of the EU banking sector: (i) sudden increased risk compounded by a reduction in secondary market liquidity; (ii) weak profitability prospects; (iii) low nominal growth and rising debt sustainability concerns; and (iv) stress in the growing shadow banking sector fueled by liquidity risk. An EU-wide asset quality review will not be conducted before the 2016 test, as was the case in 2014. National regulators regularly assess asset quality as part of their supervisory work. The EBA has not set a single capital threshold. The EBA expects the results of the stress test to be published in the third quarter of 2016. The results will be used to assist the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Processes when determining appropriate capital resources. National regulators will review the results and determine whether any supervisory measure is necessary to address any capital shortfall.
View the EBA press release and related documents.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Report Summarizing Fourth Quarter Financial Results for FDIC-Insured Institutions
02/23/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued the “Quarterly Banking Profile” which summarized financial results for the fourth quarter of 2015 for commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the FDIC. As a general matter, FDIC-insured institutions reported aggregated net income of $40.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2015, an increase of 11.9% (or $4.4 billion) from the previous year. In a statement, FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg noted that the banking industry improved on both revenue and income from the previous year, but noted that banks should remain vigilant to continued interest-rate risk, credit risk and evolving market conditions.
View more information on the FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile.
View the full text of Chairman Gruenberg’s statement.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Issue Interim Final Rules Allowing More Banks and Savings Associations to Qualify for 18-Month Examination Cycle
02/19/2016
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency jointly issued interim final rules that will allow certain well-capitalized and well‑managed insured depository institutions with less than $1 billion in total assets to qualify for an 18-month examination cycle, rather than a 12-month cycle. Institutions are considered to be well-capitalized and well-managed if they have a composite examination rating of 1 or 2—the top ratings in the five-point scale indicating the safety and soundness of a bank or savings association.
The rules are estimated to increase the number of institutions that may qualify for an 18-month examination cycle by approximately 617, to nearly 5,000 insured depository institutions. In addition, the rules increase the number of US branches and agencies of foreign banks that may qualify for an 18-month examination cycle by 26 branches and agencies, to a total of 89. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory compliance costs for smaller institutions, while still maintaining safety and soundness protections. Comments to the rules will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.
View the interim final rules and request for comments.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Approach to Identifying Other Systematically Important Institutions
02/19/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published policy statement outlining approach to identifying other systematically important institutions (i.e. institutions that are not classed as globally systematically important financial institutions but whose failure would have a significant negative effect on the UK financial system). The PRA is required to identify O-SIIs pursuant to the Capital Requirements Directive which implements the framework for domestic systemically important institutions developed by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision.
Read More.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Proposes Guide for Recognition of Institutional Protection Schemes
02/19/2016
The European Central Bank launched a consultation on its proposed guide to the recognition of institutional protection schemes for prudential purposes. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation an IPS is a contractual or statutory liability arrangement of a group of banks which protects member institutions, in particular, by ensuring their liquidity and solvency. Certain waivers or relaxation of capital requirements are available for IPS member institutions under CRR. In particular, CRR provides that the ECB may, subject to certain exceptions, allow credit institutions to apply a 0% risk weight to exposures to other counterparties whichare members of the same IPS. The ECB directly supervises the largest Eurozone banks for prudential purposes and overseas the prudential supervision by national regulators of the smaller Eurozone banks. The ECB's proposed guidelines set out how it intends to assess compliance of an IPS and its members with the requirements set out in the CRR. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by April 15, 2016. Once finalized, the final guidelines will be incorporated into the ECB Guide on options and discretions available in Union law (which is currently being finalized).
View the proposed guide.
View the ECB's consultation webpage.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Notifies Firms of Enhancements to Federal Reserve Models Used to Estimate Operational Risk and Capital
02/17/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System sent a letter to firms participating in the upcoming Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) and Comprehensive Capital Analysis Review (CCAR) notifying them of certain enhancements to aspects of its operational risk and capital models. Among the enhancements to operational risk models are losses from expenses related to put‑back mortgages, as well as potential costs form unfavorable litigation outcomes. For DFAST 2016, the Federal Reserve Board notes that it will use historically-based loss projections (with two new modifications) using an average of two models, while dropping the loss distribution approach. Changes to capital models include incorporating greater precision in the adjustments to the regulatory capital ratio denominators, as well as modifying assumptions regarding the relationship between mortgage servicing assets and associated deferred tax liabilities.
View the letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Proposed Rule to Facilitate Access to Deposits in Large Banking Failures
02/17/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a proposal that would require certain insured depository institutions to maintain certain books and records in order to facilitate the payment of insured deposits to customers in the event such institutions were to fail. The proposed rule applies to insured depositary institutions with a large number of deposit accounts (more than 2 million). Based on current data, 36 insured depository institutions would be covered by the rule. The recordkeeping requirements would require the institutions covered by the rule to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor and would require such institutions to ensure that their information technology systems have the ability to calculate the amount of insured money for each depositor within 24 hours of a failure. Comments on the proposed rule must be received within 90 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register.
View the text of the FDIC proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and US Securities Exchange Commission Issues Proposed Rule Regarding the Orderly Liquidation of Covered Broker-Dealers
02/17/2016
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the US Securities and Exchange Commission jointly issued a proposed rule to implement provisions for the orderly liquidation of covered brokers and dealers as required under Title II of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Specifically, Title II provides for federal receivership proceedings of qualifying financial companies, including covered broker-dealers, with the FDIC serving as receiver. The proposed rule defines a covered broker or dealer as any covered financial company that is registered with the SEC as a broker or dealer and is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. A covered financial company is generally one that is in danger of default and whose failure would have serious adverse effects on US financial stability, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. In the case of covered broker dealer, the FDIC will serve as receiver, but the SIPC will serve as trustee.
Comments on the proposed rule must be received within 60 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register.
View the full text of the proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Equivalence Decision on Recognized Third Countries for Treatment of Exposures of Banks
02/17/2016
A Commission Implementing Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, updating the list of third countries with equivalent regulatory arrangements in relation to prudential requirements for banks and investment firms for the purpose of the treatment of exposures. The Decision lists the countries whose arrangements for supervision and regulation of banks and investment firms are deemed by the European Commission to be equivalent to the standards of the EU as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The assessments reviewed the supervisory and regulatory arrangements in each country for: (i) banks; (ii) investment firms; and (iii) exchanges. The following nations are now equivalent across all three categories: Australia, Brazil, China, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and the United States. This Decision will enter into force on March 8, 2016.
View the list of equivalent third countries and territories.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Delivers Speech Arguing that Banks are Still Too Big to Fail
02/16/2016
In a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari argued that banks are still too big to fail and remain a significant, ongoing risk to the US economy. Kashkari noted that the Dodd-Frank Act did not go far enough and that regulators should consider breaking up large banks into smaller entities, turning them into public utilities by forcing them to hold higher levels of capital (as high as 25% of total assets), and taxing leverage throughout the financial system. According to Kashkari, the Minneapolis Fed will launch an initiative to consider transformational options through policy symposiums and policy briefs and create an actionable plan to end too big to fail that will be released by year-end for consideration by legislators, policymakers, and the public.
Kashkari’s predecessor at the Minneapolis Fed, Narayana Kocherlakota, responded to Kashkari’s proposals, noting that such measures, particularly imposing higher capital standards, would have “adverse macroeconomic consequences.”
View Kashkari’s speech.
View Kocherlakota’s response.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft EU Technical Standards on the Mapping of Credit Assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions for Securitization Positions Published
02/15/2016
The European Banking Authority published final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes that the risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approach for securitization positions should be based, if applicable, on the credit quality of the positions. This credit quality is determined by reference to the credit ratings of CRAs. The draft ITS determine the mapping between credit ratings and credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights to External Credit Assessment Institutions' ratings issued on securitizations. The mapping is backed by the results of an impact analysis as well as quantitative considerations. A securitization-specific systematic mapping methodology is also being considered by the EBA and this would be based on the historical performance of securitization ratings. The ITS aim to enhance regulatory harmonization across the EU allowing credit ratings of all registered credit rating agencies to be used for calculating institutions’ capital requirements.
View the final draft ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards Imposing Disclosure Requirements for Leverage Ratios on Financial Institutions Published
02/15/2016
The Commission Implementing Regulation on the disclosure of leverage ratios by financial institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulation provides that firms must disclose relevant information concerning leverage ratios in the form of an approved template. Firms will be under an obligation to disclose a breakdown of the leverage ratio total exposure measure, a reconciliation of the leverage ratio for a firm's published financial statements and qualitative information on the risk of excessive leverage and the factors impacting the leverage ratio. The Regulation applies directly across the EU from February 16, 2016.
View the Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Publishes Certain Revised Booklets of the Comptroller’s Handbook
02/12/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued two revised booklets of the Comptroller’s Handbook: the “Country Risk Management” booklet and the “Installment Lending” booklet. Each revised booklet updates and replaces the previous versions of the respective booklets. The “Installment Lending” booklet provides updated guidance to examiners regarding the administration of installment lending practices and the controls and processes necessary to manage the risks associated with those practices as well as updated guidance for assessing the quantity of risk associated with installment lending activities.
The “Country Risk Management” booklet provides updated guidance to examiners regarding country risk management, based on lessons learned from the financial crisis of 2008 as well as the European banking and debt crises. The booklet also updates descriptions of the risks associated with international activities and contains a more detailed discussion of the effects of country risk, cross-border risk and sovereign risk on the OCC’s 8 risk categories (credit, interest rate, liquidity, price, operational, compliance, strategic, and reputation).
View the “Installment Lending” booklet.
View the “Country Risk Management” booklet.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Chair of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Presents Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress
02/10/2016Janet Yellen, the Chair of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System submitted before Congress the Federal Reserve Board’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report. In her remarks, Chair Yellen discussed the current economic situation and outlook of the US economy since July 2015, including strong gains in the job market along with continued moderate expansion in economic activity. Chair Yellen further discussed monetary policy and emphasized that the Federal Open Market Committee continues to monitor the federal funds rate, but anticipates that economic conditions will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate.
VIew Chair Yellen’s testimony.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Vice Chairman of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Discusses the Role of the Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort
02/10/2016
Stanley Fischer, the Vice Chairman of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System gave a speech at a conference sponsored by the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation discussing the function of the Federal Reserve as a lender of last resort in the United States. In his remarks, Vice Chairman Fischer noted that, despite recent developments that have placed limitations on the Federal Reserve’s actions as a lender of last resort, the Federal Reserve, when necessary and appropriate, has the authority to act as lender of last resort in several ways. Vice Chairman Fischer noted that the Federal Reserve retains the power to extend discount window loans, either to individual institutions or more generally in order to address broader financial stresses, to insured depository institutions, including commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions, or US branches and agencies of foreign banks. Further, the Federal Reserve is also permitted, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, to lend to non-bank institutions through the use of broad-based facilities to provide liquidity to financial markets.
View the text of Vice Chairman Fischer's speech.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Releases Economic Scenarios for Use in 2016 Stress Testing
02/09/2016
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation released the economic scenarios for use by certain covered financial institutions in the 2016 stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act. Generally, those financial institutions with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion are required to conduct stress tests. The released scenarios include key variables that reflect economic activity, such as unemployment, exchange rates, prices, income, interest rates and other economic and financial factors. The FDIC coordinated with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, which released the scenarios in late January, in developing and distributing the scenarios.
View FDIC stress test scenarios.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opinion and Report on Implementation of Regulatory Review of Internal Ratings-Based Approach Models
02/04/2016
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the implementation of the regulatory review of the Internal Ratings-Based approach to calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk. The Opinion sets out the general principles and timelines for implementation and aims to provide clarity for national regulators and relevant firms. The EBA has also published a report on the future of the IRB approach. Both the Opinion and Report aim to address concerns raised over the lack of comparability of capital requirements determined under the IRB approach across firms as well as identify the main drivers of variability in the implementation of IRB models. The IRB framework will be made up of Regulatory Technical Standards and Guidelines which will be introduced in 2016 and 2017 in four phases: (i) the IRB assessment methodology will be introduced in the first quarter of 2016; (ii) a definition of "default" will be introduced by mid-2016; (iii) estimation of risk parameters and treatment of defaulted assets will be introduced by mid-2017; and (iv) credit risk mitigation will be introduced by the end of 2017. The EBA expects that the effective implementation in all areas will be finalized by the end of 2020.
View the EBA's Opinion and Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Extends Comment Period for Proposed Countercyclical Capital Buffer Framework
01/29/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System extended the comment period to March 21, 2016, for the proposed policy statement describing the Federal Reserve Board’s framework in setting the Countercyclical Capital Buffer. The original deadline for submission of comments was February 19, 2016. The Federal Reserve Board first announced it was soliciting public comment on the proposed policy statement on December 21, 2015. The CCyB is a macro-prudential tool that raises capital requirements on internationally active banking institutions when the risk of above-normal losses in the future is elevated. The proposed policy statement describes various financial-system vulnerabilities as well as issues for Federal Reserve Board consideration in setting the buffer.
View the proposed policy statement.
View the appendix to the proposed policy statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Extends Comment Period on "Total Loss Absorbing Capacity" Proposal
01/29/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System extended the comment period to February 19, 2016, for its proposed rule to strengthen the ability of the largest domestic and foreign banks operating in the United States to be resolved without extraordinary government support or taxpayer assistance. The original deadline for submission of comments was February 1, 2016. The proposed rule requires US Global Systemically Important Banks and the US operations of foreign GSIBs to meet a long-term debt requirement, a “Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity” requirement and a requirement that the parent holding company of a domestic GSIB avoid entering into various financial arrangements that would create obstacles to an orderly resolution. These requirements would strengthen the ability of those banks to withstand financial stress and failure without imposing losses on taxpayers. The proposed rule also includes regulatory capital deductions for firms regulated by the Federal Reserve Board that hold unsecured debt of the parent holding companies of domestic GSIBs.
View the Federal Register notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Amends Pre-Issuance Notification Regime
01/29/2016
The Prudential Regulation Authority published final rules amending the Pre-Issuance Notification regime. The PIN regime applies to banks, building societies, insurers and PRA-designated investment firms. Under the amended rules, banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms will have to give the PRA one month's notice before issuing a Common Equity Tier 1 instrument and complete the CET1 Compliance Template, which may be used instead of providing a legal opinion on the quality of capital requirement. The advance notification requirement will not apply where certain capital instruments are issued on substantively similar terms to prior issued instruments. Insurers will be required to submit legal opinions for instruments issued, other than ordinary share capital, on the quality of capital requirement and must also provide the PRA with one month's notice prior to amending capital instruments. Insurers will also be subject to certain conditions in the event that they make use of the advance notification exemption for drawdowns from note issuance programs. All relevant firms will be required to submit accounting opinions when issuing Additional Tier 1 Capital instruments or Restricted Tier 1 Capital instruments, as applicable.
View the PRA's Policy Statement and final rules.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Systemic Risk Buffer Proposals for UK Banks and Building Societies Published
01/29/2016
The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee published its proposed framework for the UK Systemic Risk Buffer for ring-fenced banks and large building societies (i.e. those that will be subject to the UK ring-fencing rules from 2019 with assets over £25 billion). The SRB, a discretionary buffer under the EU Capital Requirements Directive, aims to mitigate and prevent long-term non-cyclical macro-prudential or systemic risk.
The FPC is proposing that the SRB rate would be calibrated according to a firm's total Risk-Weighted Assets so that firms with RWA: (i) less than £175 billion will have a 0% SRB; (ii) between £175 and £320 billion will have a 1% SRB; (iii) between £320 and £465 billion will have a 1.5% SRB; (iv) between £465 and £610 billion will have a 2% SRB; (v) between £610 and £755 billion will have a 2.5% SRB; and (vi) over £755 billion will have a 3% SRB.
Firms subject to the SRB will also be subject to a 3% minimum leverage ratio requirement as well as an additional leverage ratio buffer of 35% of the applicable SRB rate. The Prudential Regulation Authority will apply the SRB to individual firms from 2019, which is when the ring-fencing rules will become applicable. Comments to the consultation are due by April 22, 2016. The FPC intends to finalize the rules by May 31, 2016.
View the FPC's consultation paper. -
European Securities and Markets Authority Opinion on Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Main Indices and Recognized Exchanges
01/29/2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority published its Opinion on draft Implementing Technical Standards on Main Indices and Recognized Exchanges under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Opinion sets out proposed updates to the draft ITS further to requirements under the CRR to define main indices and recognized exchanges. The definitions are required because the terms have been used in the specification of eligible collateral which is used for the calculation of credit risk by banks and investment firms subject to the CRR. ESMA provided the final draft ITS to the Commission in January 2015 for endorsement. The Commission notified ESMA that it intended to endorse the ITS with amendments by adding the Hang Seng Composite Index and the Russell 3000 Index. In ESMA's Opinion, the Hang Seng Composite Index and the Russell 3000 Index should not be added to the list of main equity indices. Instead, ESMA suggests adding the Russell 1000 Index, the Shanghai Shenzhen CSI 300, the S&P BSE 100 Index and the FTSE Nasdaq Dubai UAE 20 Index to that the list. ESMA also undertook a full review of the ITS and suggests replacing the Nikkei 225 with the Nikkei 300 and the NZSE 10 with the S&P NZX 15 Index. ESMA recommends that the European Commission consider amending the current procedure used to update the list of indices and exchanges to a less burdensome and more speedy process, as the long timeframes required to update a legislative instrument such as an ITS are not appropriate for the frequency with which indices or exchanges are created or merged.
View the Opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Systemic Risk Board Makes Recommendations on EU Macro-Prudential Policy
01/29/2016
The European Systemic Risk Board published Recommendations and Decisions relating to setting Countercyclical Buffer Rates for exposures to third countries and the assessment of cross-border effects of and voluntary reciprocity for macro-prudential measures. The ESRB is responsible for macro-prudential oversight within the European Union. In respect of CBRs, the ESRB recommends that national designated authorities: (i) inform the ESRB as soon as a third county sets a CBR in excess of 2.5%; (ii) identify material third countries on an annual basis taking into account the ESRB Decision on the assessment of materiality of third countries for recognizing and setting CBRs; and (iii) consider and coordinate on whether a lower CBR should be set for exposures to a third country in the event that the third country authority sets a lower CBR. In respect of the assessment of cross-border effects of macro-prudential measures, the ESRB recommends that national designated authorities: (i) assess the cross-border effects, prior to adoption, of the implementation of their own macro-prudential measures on other Member States and on the Single Market, including the risk of regulatory arbitrage; (ii) reciprocate the macro-prudential measures adopted by other Member States where such reciprocation is recommended by the ESRB; and (iii) notify the ESRB of any macro-prudential measure implemented, including an assessment of the effect of the measure and whether any reciprocation by other Member States may be necessary. The ESRB has also established a website which sets out the CRB rates set by national designated authorities.
View the ESRB Recommendations and Decisions.
View the CBR rate website.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Scenarios for 2016
01/28/2016
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released economic and financial market scenarios to be used by certain financial companies, including national banks and federal savings associations with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion, to conduct upcoming stress tests. The supervisory scenarios include baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios, as described in the OCC’s final rules that implement annual stress test requirements under Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
View the OCC press release.
View the 2016 scenario information.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Releases Supervisory Scenarios for 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Exercises
01/28/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released supervisory scenarios for the 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act stress test exercises. The Federal Reserve Board also issued instructions to firms participating in CCAR. CCAR assesses the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of the largest US-based bank holding companies, including the firms’ planned capital actions. The Dodd-Frank Act stress tests are a forward-looking component to help evaluate whether firms have sufficient capital. Firms are required to use the supervisory scenarios in both the stress tests conducted as part of CCAR and those required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The outcomes are measured under three scenarios: severely adverse, adverse and baseline. This year, CCAR will include 33 bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, all of which are required to submit their capital plans and stress testing results to the Federal Reserve Board on or before April 5, 2016. The Federal Reserve Board will announce the results of its supervisory stress tests by June 30, 2016, with the exact date to be announced later.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release.
View the CCAR summary instructions.
View the Dodd-Frank Act stress exercises.
View the 2016 macro scenario tables.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Letter to European Commission on Revised Deadlines for Delivery of Technical Standards
01/28/2016
The European Banking Authority published a letter dated December 18, 2015 addressed to the European Commission in which the EBA requests delays to the dates by which the EBA is required to prepare technical standards and reports under the Capital Requirements Directive, the Capital Requirements Regulation, the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the European Market Infrastructure Regulation and the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation. The EBA states that for the most part it has not been able to deliver its mandates according to deadlines due to a persistent shortage in resources and the need to prioritize other workstreams. The EBA invites the Commission to request the EBA to fulfil its mandates within new time limits.
View the EBA's letter. -
EU Regulations on Functioning of Colleges of Supervisors Published in Official Journal of the European Union
01/28/2016
Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards on the operational functioning and general conditions for the functioning of colleges of supervisors under the Capital Requirements Directive were published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Colleges bring together different national and European regulatory authorities that supervise a banking group and provide a framework for coordinating and performing supervisory duties within the EU banking sector. The College of Supervisors is established for EEA banks with subsidiaries or significant branches in other EEA countries and includes national regulators from the EU as well as non-EU areas when necessary. The Regulations deal with matters including: (i) the mapping of group institutions; (ii) the designation of members and observers of a college; and (iii) participation in college meetings and activities. The Regulations enter into force on February 17, 2016.
View the RTS.
View the ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation on Joint Processes for the Application of Prudential Permissions Published in Official Journal of European Union
01/28/2016
A Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, setting out Implementing Technical Standards on the joint decision process for the application for certain prudential permissions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The ITS deal with matters including: (i) the involvement of third country supervisory authorities in the assessment process; (ii) the steps and procedures for joint decision processes; (iii) the preparation of assessment reports and arriving at and communicating joint decisions; and (iv) resolution of disagreements and decisions taken in the absence of a joint decision. The Regulation enters into force on February 17, 2016.
View the ITS on the joint decision process for the application for certain prudential permissions.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulations on Prudent Valuations Published in Official Journal of European Union
01/28/2016
A Regulation setting out Regulatory Technical Standards for prudent valuations under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS relate to firms applying the CRR standards to assets measured on a fair value basis. The RTS deal with matters including: (i) the methodology for calculating Additional Valuation Adjustments; (ii) consideration to be given to available market data; and (iii) the simplified and core approaches for the determination of AVAs. The Regulation enters into force on February 17, 2016.
View the RTS for prudent valuation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Impact Assessment of New International Financial Reporting Standards
01/27/2016
The European Banking Authority issued a press release announcing the launch of an impact assessment of the forthcoming implementation of the new financial instruments standard, the International Financial Reporting Standards 9, on a sample of around 50 regulated firms across the EU. The new standards supersede the reporting standards for financial instruments in force in the EU since 2005 and change the way financial instruments are accounted for. The new standards will apply to: (i) banks that are required to prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with the IFRS; (ii) banks that are required to use the IFRS for the determination of own funds; and (iii) certain investment firms. IFRS also apply to listed issuers as a result of the Transparency Directive. The EBA will assess the impact of the new standards on regulatory own funds, the interaction between the standards and prudential requirements as well as how firms are preparing for the implementation of the new standards.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Report on Appropriateness of Definition of Eligible Capital under the Capital Requirements Regulation
01/26/2016
The European Commission published a report on the appropriateness of the definition of "eligible capital" under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The definition of "eligible capital" is used for defining large exposures, setting large exposure limits, determining the prudential treatment of qualifying holdings outside the financial sector and setting the capital requirements for investment firms with limited investment services.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Seeks Comment of How Small Banks are Assessed for Deposit Insurance
01/21/2016
The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation released a revised notice of proposed rulemaking that would amend the manner in which banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured by the FDIC for at least five years are assessed for deposit insurance. The rule reflects comments received on the initial proposed rule on small bank assessments that the FDIC released in June 2015 on topics such as calculation of asset growth and treatment of reciprocal deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Specifically, the new proposed rule, among other things: (i) uses a brokered deposit ratio as a measure in the financial ratios method for calculating assessment rates for established small banks (instead of the previously proposed core deposit ratio); (ii) removes the existing brokered deposit adjustment for established small banks; and (iii) revises the previously proposed one-year asset growth measure. The new proposed rule, like the June 2015 proposal, seeks to ascertain appropriate assessments that accurately reflect the risks taken by smaller banks. Comments may be submitted for 30 days, following the publication of the proposed amendments in the Federal Register.
View the FDIC press release.
View the notice of proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Approve Interim Final Rule Expanding 18-Month Exam Cycle for Certain Institutions
01/21/2016
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg and US Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry announced interim final rules expanding the examination cycle for institutions with less than $1 billion in assets that meet certain standards, under statutory power granted by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act which was enacted on December 4, 2015. Specifically, the rule will permit institutions with total assets of $200 million or greater and not exceeding $1 billion that receive a composite CAMELS or ROCA rating of “1” or “2,” and that meet other qualifying criteria, to qualify for an 18-month examination cycle. Previously, the longer, 18 month exam cycle was only available to certain insured depository institutions with less than $500 million in assets. Comments on the interim final rule may be submitted for 60 days, following the publication of the proposed amendments in the Federal Register.
View the FDIC Chairman's statement.
View the OCC press release.
View the Comptroller's statement.
View the interim final rule.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig Provides Remarks on the Role of Debt in Bank Resiliency and Resolvability
01/20/2016
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig gave a speech to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, during which he challenged the Federal Reserve Board’s proposal on TLAC. While agreeing that converting debt is often part of a reorganization or recovery strategy, Hoenig discussed the risks of increased debt levels on the stability of the banking system. The proposed TLAC rule requires GSIBs to maintain sufficient long-term debt to facilitate a Single Point of Entry resolution approach, wherein only the top-tier holding company would be put into receivership and through conversion of debt to equity the operating subsidiaries would be recapitalized. Hoenig noted that the proposed rule estimates that to meet a collective $680 billion long-term debt requirement, GSIBs will need to issue approximately $100 billion in new debt. Hoenig also discussed the negative consequences of the proposal, notably the leverage that it would add to an already highly-leveraged industry, as well as the fact that it may encourage firms to adopt an SPOE resolution strategy and otherwise change their business models even where their Title I resolution plans do not currently contemplate an SPOE plan. The Vice Chairman suggested that “(t)he long-term debt requirement would place added earning demands on the banking system and could be counter-productive, especially during a period of financial stress”. Hoenig also suggested that rather than imposing a rule that facilitates only the SPOE strategy, regulators may want to adopt an approach that is tailored to the business model and resolution plan of each individual institution, even where the approach might call for varying debt and equity requirements.
View the Vice Chairman's speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Guidelines on Implicit Support in Securitizations
01/20/2016
The European Banking Authority published proposed Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions (i.e. support provided by a firm where it is not contractually obliged to do so), as required by the Capital Requirements Regulation. Examples of implicit support include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR restricts the provision of implicit support, because it does not result in significant risk transfer to third parties, by requiring firms to hold a minimum of own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized. A transaction is not considered to provide support if it is executed under arm's length conditions and is taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The EBA's proposed Guidelines cover what constitutes arm's length conditions and when a transaction is not structured to provide support.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Approve the Establishment of a Representative Office by Unione di Banche Italiane, S.p.A.
01/19/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved an application by Union di Banche Italiene, S.p.A., a foreign bank headquartered in Italy, to establish a representative office in New York under section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978. UBI is organized as a joint stock corporation under Italian law and has total assets of approximately $108 billion. As part of its evaluation under the IBA and Regulation K, the Federal Reserve Board noted its previous determinations that other banks in Italy were subject to comprehensive, consolidated supervision by the Bank of Italy alone. However, UBI became subject to direct prudential supervision by the European Central Bank pursuant to the Single Supervisory Mechanism as of November 2014. This order appears to represent the first Federal Reserve Board order under the IBA since the SSM took effect, finding that a foreign bank is subject to comprehensive, consolidated supervision by the ECB and a home country supervisor (the Bank of Italy) acting through the SSM.
View the order.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Parliament Treasury Committee's Letter to Bank of England on Challenger Banks
01/18/2016
A letter addressing possible competition issues between established and challenger banks dated October 7, 2015 sent from the Chairman of the Treasury Committee, Mr. Andrew Tyrie, addressed to the Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England, Mr. Andrew Bailey, was published. The letter refers to the potential difficulties challenger banks may face in satisfying the conditions required to use the Internal Ratings-Based approach for calculating credit risk. Mr. Tyrie is concerned that newer banks may be at a competitive disadvantage to more established banks, given that the IRB approach leads to lower capital requirements compared to the Standardized Approach which newer smaller banks would be able to use more easily. The letter asks whether: (i) the new corporation tax regime for banks encourages competition between new and established banks; (ii) adaptations made by the Prudential Regulation Authority's to capital requirements for new banks will be effective in overcoming the competitive disadvantage that new banks may face; (iii) the PRA has plans to make further adjustments to capital or other requirements for new banks; (iv) the PRA is restricted, and if so, to what extent, from making further adjustments to newer banks' capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive IV or other EU legislation; and (v) there has been a reduction in requests for pre-application discussions with the PRA and Financial Conduct Authority since the new tax regime was announced in July 2015.
View the letter. -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Release Advisory on External Audits
01/15/2016
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released an advisory indicating support for the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s March 2014 guidance entitled “External audits of banks” for internationally active banks. The advisory notes that while the guidance is largely consistent with existing US standards and practices, there are certain differences between the principles and the expectations of US regulators. The advisory defines “internationally active banks” as insured depository institutions that have consolidated total assets of $250 billion or more, consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign exposure of $10 billion or more and US depository institution holding companies that meet, or have a subsidiary depository institution that meets, the same standards (with the calculation of consolidated total assets excluding assets held by insurance underwriting subsidiaries, in the case of bank holding companies). Key differences highlighted in the advisory include: (i) unlike the guidance, US standards and practices do not require “tendering”, i.e., putting an external audit contract out for bid, but the US banking agencies recommend that institutions consider whether such practice is appropriate; and (ii) while the US banking agencies encourage open communication between external auditors and a financial institution’s supervisor, there is no generally applicable requirement for an external auditor to report directly to the institution’s primary regulators.
View the interagency advisory statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Revises Standards on Minimum Capital Requirements for Market Risk
01/14/2016
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published revised standards on minimum capital requirements for market risk, which form part of the new market risk framework as endorsed by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision, known as GHOS, the Basel Committee's governing body. Improvements in the new risk framework include: (i) a revised boundary between the banking and trading books that will reduce scope for arbitrage; (ii) a revised internal models approach with more coherent and comprehensive risk capture; (iii) an enhanced model approval process and more prudent recognition of hedging and portfolio diversification; and (iv) a revised standardized approach that serves as a credible fall-back and floor to the model-based approach and facilitates more consistent and comparable reporting of market risk across banks and jurisdictions. The Basel Committee will also finalize its efforts to address the problem of excessive variability in risk-weighted assets by the end of this year. These efforts will include a proposal to remove the internal model approach for credit risk and limits on the use of internal models for credit risk (in particular, through the use of floors). The GHOS also agreed that the final design and calibration of the leverage ratio should be based on a Tier 1 definition of capital and should comprise a minimum level of 3%. The Basel Committee will finalize the calibration in 2016 to allow time for the leverage ratio to be implemented as a Pillar 1 measure by January 1, 2018.
View the revised minimum capital requirements for market risk.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Revised Final Draft Technical Standards and Guidelines for the Identification of Global Systemically Important Institutions
01/13/2016
The European Banking Authority published: (i) revised final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the uniform formats and date for disclosure of values used to identify Global Systemically Important Institutions; (ii) revised final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the methodology for the identification of G-SIIs; and (iii) draft revised Guidelines on the further specification of the indicators of global systemic importance and their disclosure under the Capital Requirements Directive IV.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Eurozone Supervisory Priorities for 2016 Published
01/06/2016
The European Central Bank's Banking Supervision division published its priorities for 2016. Under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation, the ECB is responsible for the direct prudential supervision of the largest Eurozone banks and indirectly responsible for prudentially supervising the smaller Eurozone banks. The priorities, which aim to direct the ECB's supervision of the largest Eurozone banks, are business model and profitability risk, credit risk, capital adequacy, risk governance and data quality and liquidity. The ECB will be implementing initiatives around the priorities during 2016, including thematic reviews and holding dialogue with the banks.
View the 2016 SSM Priorities.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Publishes Assessment of the Effect of the Revised International Accounting Standard 19 on Own Funds
01/06/2016
The European Commission published a report on the effect of the revised International Accounting Standard 19 on the volatility of own funds of banks and investment firms. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the Commission to assess whether the revised IAS 19 and the requirement on firms to deduct defined-benefit pension fund assets from Common Equity Tier 1 items for the purpose of calculating own funds would impact the volatility of the firm's own funds. The Commission has concluded that the potential additional volatility of own funds introduced by the revision of IAS 19 is limited and that the impact due to initial application has been mitigated by the transitional measures included in the CRR. The Commission therefore does not intend to propose amendments to the CRR in this regard.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Recommends Insufficiently Capitalized Eurozone Banks Not To Make a Dividend Distribution
12/30/2015
A European Central Bank Recommendation on dividend distribution policies for Eurozone banks was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The recommendation is aimed at significant supervised entities (i.e. significant banks) and significant supervised groups (each as defined in the Single Supervisory Mechanism Framework Regulation) as well as national regulators. Under the SSM Regulation, the ECB is responsible for the direct prudential supervision of significant Eurozone banks. The Recommendation states that banks must use conservative and prudent assumptions when establishing dividend policies so that any applicable capital requirements, for example minimum capital requirements or countercyclical capital and systemic buffers, are still met after any distribution. The recommendation also makes suggestions for different categories of banks paying dividends for the 2015 financial year in 2016: (i) banks that satisfy the applicable capital requirements and have reached their fully loaded (i.e. calculated without applying the transitional provisions as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation) capital ratios as at December 31, 2015 should distribute net profits in dividends conservatively; (ii) banks that satisfy the applicable capital requirements, but have not reached their fully loaded ratios as at December 31, 2015 should distribute net profits in dividends conservatively and in principle should only pay out dividends if a linear path to the required loaded capital requirements is secured; and (iii) banks that do not satisfy the applicable capital requirements should not distribute dividends. The Recommendation also states that should a bank not be able to comply with the ECB's Recommendation due to a legal obligation to pay out dividends, it should contact its supervisory team immediately.
View the Recommendation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Proposed Guidelines on Stress Testing
12/18/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on proposed Guidelines on stress testing and supervisory stress testing. The proposed Guidelines cover: (i) internal stress testing by firms, providing detailed guidance for firms when designing and conducting a stress testing program; (ii) the assessment of firms' stress testing by national regulators with the aim of ensuring convergence in the context of the supervisory review and evaluation process; and (iii) supervisory stress testing. The proposed Guidelines provide common organizational requirements, methodologies and processes for firms performing internal stress tests as part of their risk management processes and common methodologies for national regulators when conducting supervisory stress tests but do not set methodologies for the EBA's stress testing in cooperation with national regulators. Once finalized, the Guidelines will replace the current guidelines issued by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors. The consultation is open until March 18, 2016. The EBA aims to publish the final Guidelines in Q2 2016 and expects that they will apply from Q4 2016.
View the proposed Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opines on Maximum Distributable Amount Under EU Regulation Capital Framework
12/18/2015
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion, dated December 16, 2015, addressed to national regulators and the European Commission on the interaction of Pillar 1, Pillar 2 and combined buffer requirements and restrictions on distributions. The EBA considers that national regulators should ensure that the Common Equity Tier 1 capital that is used for calculation of the maximum distributable amount is limited to the amount not used to meet a firm's Pillar 1 and 2 own funds requirements. Also, national regulators should require firms to disclose MDA-relevant capital requirements. The EBA is also of the view that the Commission should review the MDA provisions of the Capital Requirements Directive, aiming to eliminate inconsistencies in the application of the provisions across the EU and should review the prohibition on distribution, in particular, as it relates to Additional Tier 1 instruments when no profits are made in a given year.
View the Opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Synthetic Securitization in Europe
12/18/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report on its analysis and market practice assessment of synthetic securitization in Europe. The report makes recommendations for the European Commission's proposed legislative amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation and proposed securitization regulation, which provide for the preferential regulatory treatment of simple, transparent and standardized securitizations. The EBA's analysis supports the approach taken by the Commission in its proposed securitization framework, which provides for a different regulatory treatment of on-balance sheet synthetic securitization positions retained by originator banks. The EBA concurs that the proposed framework should not be extended to all synthetic securitizations applicable to all investors across asset types. The EBA recommends that certain criteria be met for eligibility of balance sheet synthetic transactions, including requirements that originator banks should meet to transfer the risk of eligible transactions to public or private investors. In particular, the EBA advises the Commission to consider amending its proposal to include transactions in which private investors provide credit protection in the form of cash. The report follows the EBA's report in July 2015 on a qualifying framework for traditional securitization.
View the report.
View the Commission's proposed securitization framework.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Recommends Net Stable Funding Requirement for EU Banks
12/17/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report, dated December 15, 2015, on the necessity for adding stable funding requirements to the EU regulatory capital requirements framework. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the EBA to report to the Commission on whether and how it would be appropriate to ensure that banks and investment firms use stable sources of funding and to provide an assessment of the impact of a stable funding requirement on the businesses and risk profiles of firms in the EU, the financial markets, the economy and trade financing, as well as potential methodologies for determining the amount of stable funding available to and required by firms. The mandate was included in the CRR in response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's publication in 2010 of a net stable funding ratio (known as the NSFR) to be put in place by 2018. The NSFR requires firms to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to their assets and off-balance-sheet activities over a period of one year.
Read more.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Third Progress Report on the Compliance by G-SIBs with Principles For Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting
12/16/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its third progress report on the adoption by banks of its Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. The Principles must be implemented by global systemically important banks by January 1, 2016, and aim to strengthen risk data aggregation and risk reporting at banks so that risk management and decision-making practices are improved. The report details the progress that G-SIBs have made in order to comply with the Principles. The Basel Committee recommends that: (i) banks and national regulators should continue to promote understanding of the Principles; (ii) national regulators should conduct more in-depth/specialised examinations on data aggregation requirements to evaluate weaknesses; (iii) banks should clearly articulate risk data aggregation and risk reporting expectations, in line with their risk appetite in both normal and stress periods; (iv) banks should have appropriate governance arrangements in place to oversee manual processes; (v) banks should consider reducing the complexity of their systems to meet the data aggregation requirements; (vi) auditors should undertake an independent assessment of each bank's compliance with the Principles in early 2016, reporting any necessary remedial action to the bank's board; and (vii) banks that are unable to comply by the deadline should agree plans to do so with their national regulator. The Basel Committee also recommends that national regulators apply the Principles to domestic systemically important banks (known as D-SIBs) from three years after they have been identified as such.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Proposes Extension of Exemptions for Commodity Dealers
12/16/2015
The European Commission published a proposed Regulation which would amend the Capital Requirements Regulation with regards to exemptions for commodity dealers. The CRR currently exempts commodity dealers from large exposures requirements and own fund requirements until December 31, 2017. That date was set on the basis that the Commission would have conducted a review of the prudential regime applicable to commodity dealers and to investment firms by the end of 2015 and, if appropriate, proposed a legislative regime adapted for the risks profile of commodity dealers and investment firms. The Commissions' review is still in progress. The Commission is therefore proposing that the CRR exemptions are extended until December 31, 2020 to allow time for work in this area to be completed and to avoid the need for relevant firms to temporarily comply with the full CRR requirements in 2018 before being subsequently moved to a tailored regime within two to three years.
View the proposed Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation on Currencies with Constraints on Availability of Liquid Assets Published
12/16/2015
The Regulation setting out Implementing Technical Standards for currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR sets out a Liquidity Coverage Requirement which requires firms to hold liquid assets to maintain adequate levels of liquidity buffers to face any possible imbalances between liquidity inflows and outflows. The CRR allows firms to apply derogations where justified needs for liquid assets exist owing to the Liquidity Coverage Requirement, which exceed the availability of those liquid assets in certain currencies. The Regulation identifies the Norwegian Krone as a currency with constraints on the availability of liquid assets. The Regulation enters into force on January 5, 2016.
View the Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Guidelines on Limiting Exposures to Shadow Banking Entities Published
12/15/2015
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on requirements for banks and certain investment firms to have sufficient information about, and to set limits on, their individual and aggregate exposure to shadow banking entities which carry out certain banking-like activities, such as lending, outside a regulated framework. The EBA is mandated to produce the Guidelines under the Capital Requirements Regulation which limits the exposure a firm can have to a single client or group of connected clients (more generally known as limits to large exposures). In order to prepare the Guidelines, the EBA collected data from 148 EU firms on their exposures to shadow banking entities, the results of which are published in a separate report. Both the Report and the Guidelines will help inform the European Commission's report on the appropriateness and impact of imposing such limits, which may be accompanied by a legislative proposal. The EBA Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2017.
View the Guidelines.
View the EBA's report. -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Standards on Assessment Methodology for Use of Internal Models
12/14/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on proposed draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation on the assessment methodology national regulators should use when a firm applies for approval to calculate their own funds requirements using their internal models for one or more risk categories. In particular, the proposed draft RTS cover: (i) the methodology for national regulators to assess whether a firm complies with the requirements to use an Internal Model Approach for market risk; and (ii) the conditions under which national regulators assess the significance of the positions that will be included in the scope of an IMA. The proposed draft RTS are consistent with the RTS on the conditions for assessing materiality of extensions and changes to use market internal models, adopted by the European Commission in June 2015. Comments are due by March 13, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Finalizes Revised FR Y‑15 Reporting Requirements and Seeks Comments on Section 165‑Related Revisions to Form FR Y‑7
12/11/2015
The Federal Reserve Board published a final rule to revise certain elements of its “Banking Organization Systemic Risk Report” (Form FR Y‑15) that will become effective as of December 31, 2015. However, the new requirement to file the form on a quarterly basis has been extended until June 30, 2016, and the effective date of the new requirements for reporting short‑term wholesale funding (Schedule G) has been extended to December 31, 2016. While the preamble to the final rule notes that reporting requirements for Intermediate Holding Companies that foreign banking organizations are required to designate or establish under Dodd‑Frank Act Section 165 have not yet been proposed, under current requirements IHCs with a US bank subsidiary and $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets would be required to file the FR Y‑15 beginning with the next filing date following its establishment. Commenters requested an extension for IHCs, but the Federal Reserve Board indicated it would invite comment on this issue when reporting requirements for IHCs are proposed.
On December 2, 2015, the Federal Reserve Board proposed certain new line items to its “Annual Report of Foreign Banking Organizations” (Form FR Y‑7) to collect information from foreign banking organizations required to comply with the enhanced prudential standards for foreign banking organizations prescribed by Section 165 of the Dodd‑Frank Act.
View the The final rule for Form FR Y‑15.
View the proposed revisions to Form FR Y‑7.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation on Extension of Transitional Provisions for Exposures to CCPs Published in Official Journal of the European Union
12/11/2015
The Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods for own funds requirements for exposures to CPPs as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Implementing Regulation extends the transitional period for regulatory capital requirements for EU banks’ exposures to CCPs from December 15, 2015 to June 15, 2016. The extension is intended to allow further time for CCPs, both from the EU and from non-EU jurisdictions, to become authorized or recognized under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. This is linked to the current consultation on margin holding period for exchange-traded derivatives, published by ESMA on December 14, 2015, which should result in technical standards paving the way for recognition in the new year. The provision aims to minimize disruption to financial markets and to prevent institutions from being penalized through higher own funds requirements during the processes of authorization and recognition of existing CCPs. The Implementing Regulation comes into effect on December 12, 2015.
View the Regulation.
View ESMA's consultation on margin holding period.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Guidelines for Collection of Information for Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process under the Capital Requirements Directive
12/11/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on draft Guidelines for the collection of information for the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process under the Capital Requirements Directive. The consultation forms part of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process and follows on from the criteria and methodologies specified in the EBA Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for SREP. The Guidelines aim to facilitate the assessment of ICAAP and ILAAP as well as to create a consistent approach to the ICAAP and ILAAP frameworks and to the assessment of reliability of the own capital and liquidity estimates of financial institutions. The draft Guidelines set out, amongst other things, the general criteria for national regulators for the collection of ICAAP and ILAAP information from institutions and will be finalized following the completion of the consultation. The Guidelines are expected to apply from June 30, 2016. Comments are due by March 11, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Regulatory Technical Standards under EU Financial Conglomerates Directive Published
12/11/2015
A Commission Delegated Regulation, in the form of Regulatory Technical Standards, was published setting out criteria for the assessment of intra-group transactions and risk concentrations under the EU Financial Conglomerates Directive. The RTS provide national regulators and coordinators with criteria for assessing whether intra-group transactions and risk concentrations are significant and provide for more harmonized reporting of information by financial conglomerates. The Financial Conglomerates Directive provides for the supplementary prudential supervision on a group-wide basis of groups including banks, insurance undertakings and investment firms which are part of a financial conglomerate which provide services and products in different sectors of the financial markets. The Directive covers, amongst other things, the solvency position and risk concentration at the level of the conglomerate, intra-group transactions, internal risk management processes at conglomerate level and regulations on the fit and proper character of the conglomerate's management.
View the Delegated Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opinion and Report on Cooperation and Information Sharing between Regulators
12/10/2015
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion and Report on cooperation and information sharing between EU and non-EU national regulators, as required under the Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA identifies areas of improvement and proposes legislative changes to encourage better prudential supervision of international banks and investment firms. The Opinion states that there is a need for more clarity in the equivalence assessment processes of non-EU supervisory and regulatory regimes, confidentiality regimes within and outside supervisory colleges as well as in the supervision of institutions on a consolidated basis. The EBA states that the establishment of clear instructions on equivalence assessments in the CRD and Capital Requirements Regulation would facilitate coordinated and consistent equivalent assessments. The EBA also proposes, amongst other things, to align the CRD with the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive so that specific references to the status of "observers" are provided for non-EU national regulators that participate in supervisory colleges.
View the Opinion and Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Revised Standardized Approach to Credit Risk Proposed at International Level
12/10/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a second consultation on revisions to the Standardized Approach for credit risk. The consultation seeks to address concerns raised during the first consultation which proposed that references to external ratings for exposures to banks and corporates be removed and that those exposures should be assigned risk weights based on two risk drivers. The Basel Committee is therefore proposing that different approaches should be adopted, depending on whether a jurisdiction prohibits the use of external ratings for regulatory purposes. For exposures to banks: (i) in jurisdictions that allow the use of ratings for regulatory purposes, ratings would be the primary source to determine risk weights for rated exposures, subject to due diligence requirements; and (ii) in jurisdictions that do not allow the use of ratings for regulatory purposes and for unrated exposures in all jurisdictions, exposures would be classified into three different buckets, subject to certain criteria being met. The Basel Committee is also proposing revised approaches for exposures to corporates, secured by real estate, multilateral development banks, retail and defaulted exposures and off-balance sheet items. Responses to the consultation are due by March 11, 2016.
View the consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Issues Revised List of Validation Rules for Supervisory Reporting
12/10/2015
The European Banking Authority published a revised list of validation rules for submitting supervisory reporting data. The rules detail the standards and formats that are to be used for submissions of data by national regulators under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. The revised list displays the rules that have been deactivated due to technical issues or incorrectness.
View the revised list.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Draft Implementing Technical Standards Amending Regulation on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions and Financial Reporting
12/08/2015
The European Banking Authority published Draft Implementing Technical Standards amending the Implementing Regulation on the supervisory reporting of institutions with regard to financial reporting (known as FINREP). This follows on from the changes made to the International Accounting Standards that were issued in July 2014. The new standards supersede the reporting standard for financial instruments in force in the EU since 2005 and change the way that financial instruments are accounted for. The changes require significant amendments to the FINREP reporting templates and instructions. The new standards will apply to: (i) banks that are required to prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards; (ii) banks that are required to use the IFRS for the determination of own funds; and (iii) certain investment firms. Comments are due by March 8, 2016.
View the consultation and related documents.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Policy Statement on Implementation of UK Leverage Ratio Framework
12/07/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a policy statement on the implementation of the UK's Leverage Ratio Framework, providing feedback to responses to its previous consultation paper. The Financial Policy Committee directed the PRA, on July 1, 2015, to implement a UK LRF applying: (i) a minimum leverage requirement of 3% to major UK banks and building societies on a consolidated basis; (ii) a supplementary Leverage Ratio Buffer of 35%; and (iii) a countercyclical LRB of 35% of a firm’s institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer rate. The PRA’s policy statement applies to PRA-regulated banks and building societies with retail deposits of £50 billion or more. The PRA is implementing the FPC's requirements as proposed, except that it is extending its proposed transition period for daily averaged leveraged ratio requirements by 12 months, ending on December 31, 2017, while maintaining the 12 month transitional period for implementing the daily averaging reporting requirement. This would allow firms additional time to improve the comparability and accuracy of averaged numbers without compromising the monitoring of the UK leverage framework. The PRA has also published supervisory statements on the UK leverage ratio, instructions for completing data items and on the capital requirements for major UK banks and building societies.
View the policy statement and supervisory statements.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Progress Report on Principles and Recommendations for Enhancing Risk Disclosures of Banks
12/07/2015
The Financial Stability Board published a progress report from the Enhanced Disclosure Task Force on the implementation of the EDTF's recommendations for enhancing risk disclosures of banks. The report, which covers 40 global or domestic systemically important banks, includes updates based on 2014 annual reports as well as self-assessments by banks and assessments made by users of financial disclosures. The report states that the self-assessments provided by banks show disclosure of 82% of the information recommended by the EDTF. This represents an increase of 7% from the previous year. The report also states that there are still significant opportunities for banks to improve credit risk disclosures and that credit risk disclosures vary significantly across different countries, with UK banks having the highest implementation rates.
View the report. -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Final Rule Providing Information on its Revised Capital Rules for Non-Traditonal Stock Corporations
12/04/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a final rule clarifying the application of the revised capital framework, originally issued in June 2013, to depository institution holding companies that are organized as non-stock entities, such as limited liability companies and partnerships. The final rule illustrates how capital instruments that are issued by firms that are not organized as traditional stock corporations may qualify as regulatory capital under the revised regulatory capital framework. The final rule, which is substantively similar to the proposed rule issued in December 2014, goes into effect January 1, 2016.
Separately, the final rule notes the Federal Reserve Board’s intention to issue separate regulatory capital rules to clarify how (i) depository institution holding companies that are employee stock ownership plans and (ii) savings and loan holding companies that are personal or family trusts, rather than business trusts, in each case, will be treated under the capital rules.
View the text of the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Administrative Penalties Published on an Anonymous Basis
12/02/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report on the administrative penalties for breach of national law implementing the Capital Requirements Directive imposed by Member States and published on an anonymous basis. Under the CRD, Member States must publish details of any administrative penalties imposed for breach of the relevant national law except in certain circumstances where the CRD allows the publication to be anonymous. The EBA is required to report on any divergences between member states in their approach to the publication of penalties on an anonymous basis and in the duration of the publication under national law. The EBA makes the following recommendations: (i) the penalties should be published on a dedicated part of the website to enhance accessibility; (ii) the decision should also be published in English or a summary thereof; and (iii) that the grounds for deciding to publish a decision on an anonymous basis should be disclosed, where appropriate.
View the report. -
Bank of England Identifies Main Current Risks in UK Financial System
12/01/2015
The Bank of England published its Financial Stability Report in which the Financial Policy Committee explains the key risks affecting the UK financial system. The report states that UK banks are now more resilient than they were before the global financial crisis with the result that they are now more willing to make credit available. Risks relating to Greece and its financing needs have fallen significantly since publication of the Bank of England’s Financial Stability Report in July 2015. However, risks originating from advanced economies have moved to emerging market economies and asset prices are deemed to be vulnerable to a crystallization of risks in emerging markets. The FPC states that it is not currently seeking further structural increases in capital requirements for the system as a whole and is also maintaining the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate at 0%. With regards to effective arrangements for bank resolution, the FPC deems that an effective resolution regime has been established in the UK, in part, through ring-fencing, and that new requirements for total loss-absorbing capacity for global systematically important banks will ensure that banks have liabilities that can absorb losses and are able to recapitalize banks in resolution. The report also states that cyber risk continues to be a threat to the UK financial system.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Banking System Stress Test Results Published
12/01/2015
The Bank of England published the results of the 2015 UK banking system stress tests. The 2015 stress test was the BoE's second concurrent stress test of the UK banking system and covered seven major UK banks and building societies. The BoE's Financial Policy Committee will not be taking any macroprudential actions on bank capital in response to the results, considering that the banking system is sufficiently capitalised to support the real economy in a severe global stress scenario. The Prudential Regulation Authority determined that the stress test showed that five of the seven participating firms did not have any capital inadequacies (Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide Building Society and Santander UK) but that both The Royal Bank of Scotland Group and Standard Chartered had not met their individual capital requirements. However, the PRA had not required those two firms to submit revised capital plans on the basis that certain steps had already been taken by the firms. As per the BoE's Approach to Stress Testing the UK Banking System published in October 2015, the BoE will run its first annual cyclical scenario concurrent stress test in 2015, the results for which will be published in Q4 2016.
View the results.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Assessment on Pillar 3 Reports for 17 European Banks
11/27/2015
The European Banking Authority published its first annual assessment on the Pillar 3 reports of a sample of European banks for the 2014 financial year. The report evaluates the compliance of banks against the disclosure requirements set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The report states there has been an increase in the quality of disclosures, in particular relating to clear disclosure indices and information on risk model parameters. Areas that could be improved further include: (i) the breakdown of capital requirements by exposure classes; (ii) the breakdown of internal ratings-based risk parameters by exposures and geography; and (iii) the assessment of the status, remuneration and asset encumbrance of global systemically important institutions. The report also includes a comparison of the revised Basel Pillar 3 requirements published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in January 2015 against the current disclosure requirements set out in the CRR.
View the Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation on Closely Correlated Currencies Published in Official Journal of the European Union
11/27/2015
The Regulation on Implementing Technical Standards for closely correlated currencies as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Closely correlated currencies are currencies that meet specific criteria set out in the CRR, which states that firms may provide lower own funds requirements against foreign exchange risk for positions in relevant closely correlated currencies. The pairs of currencies that meet such criteria are set out in the Annex to the Regulation. The list of closely correlated currencies will be updated yearly.
View the Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finalizes Rule on Capital Plan and Stress Testing
11/25/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved a final rule to modify its capital plan and stress testing rules, which would take effect for the 2016 capital plan and stress testing cycle. Largely similar to the proposed rule, the final rule modifies the timing for certain regulatory requirements that have not yet been incorporated into the capital plan and stress testing framework. Firms subject to the supplementary leverage ratio would begin to incorporate it into their 2017 capital plan and stress testing cycle. All firms would continue to use the generally applicable risk-based capital framework for stress-testing exercises. However, firms with at least $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion in on-balance sheet foreign exposures would continue to be subject to the advanced approaches risk-based capital framework for their regulatory capital ratios. The common equity tier 1 capital requirement in the Federal Reserve Board’s revised regulatory capital rules will be fully phased in over the nine-quarter planning horizon of the 2016 capital plan and stress testing cycles. The final rule eliminates the requirement for firms to calculate a tier 1 common ratio.
View the press release.
View the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Announces Implementation of Several Recommendations to Enhance Supervision of Large and Complex Banking Organizations
11/24/2015
The US Federal Reserve Board announced the implementation of several recommendations to enhance the supervision of large and complex banking organizations. These recommendations followed a comprehensive review of Reserve Bank procedures for supporting sound supervisory decisions as well for resolving differing staff opinions related to the supervision of large and complex organizations. Among other issues, the review identified inconsistencies in practices by Reserve Banks as well as in documentation generated by supervisory teams. The review also noted that a formal process for raising divergent staff views had not been established. As a result, the Operating Committee of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee (known as LISCC), which coordinates the supervision of the largest, most systemically important financial institutions in the US, will oversee the establishment of minimum operating and documentation standards for all supervisory activities. The Federal Reserve System will also work to develop policies and practices to encourage the exchange of differing staff views on all supervisory matters. Additionally, the Federal Reserve System will be developing a curriculum specifically designed for the supervision of large financial institutions for its examiner commissioning and training program.
View the press release.
View the review.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Proposes Rule Requiring Large Banking Organizations to Publicly Disclose Several Measures of their Liquidity Profile
11/24/2015
The US Federal Reserve Board issued a proposed rule that would require large banking organizations to publicly disclose certain measures of their liquidity profile, including, for the first time, quantitative liquidity risk metrics. The proposed rule would require large banking organizations to disclose, on a quarterly basis, their consolidated Liquidity Coverage Ratios based on averages over the prior quarter. In addition, firms would have to disclose their consolidated High-Quality Liquid Asset amounts, organized by HQLA category, as well as their projected net cash outflow amounts, including retail inflows and outflows, derivatives inflows and outflows as well as various other measures. The required disclosures are based generally on a template approved by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision with enhancements to reflect US implementation of LCR requirements.
View the press release.
View the proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Proposal on Establishment of European Deposit Insurance Scheme
11/24/2015
The European Commission published a legislative proposal together with a press release on the establishment of a new European Deposit Insurance Scheme. The EDIS would be a euro area-wide insurance scheme for bank deposits, strengthening the EU's economic and monetary union, setting out measures to reduce risk in the banking sector and amending the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation. The scheme would initially consist of a reinsurance scheme for participating national Deposit Guarantee Schemes in the first three years, after which co-insurance schemes would be put into place for four years, whereby contributions to the EDIS would increase. The EDIS would be funded by contributions made by banks established in the Single Supervisory Mechanism and a full European scheme would be in place by 2024. National schemes would only be able to access EDIS funds if clear conditions are met. The EDIS would encourage national schemes to manage any possible risks cautiously and would be mandatory for member states covered by the SSM. The scheme would also be open to those member states who are not covered by the SSM but who would like to join the Banking Union. National DGSs already provide protection at a national level. The EDIC would back these with a common European scheme.
View the press release.
View the legislative proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Delivers Speech at The Clearing House Annual Conference
11/18/2015
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman, Martin J. Gruenberg, gave a speech at The Clearing House annual conference regarding progress the FDIC has made in implementing the Dodd-Frank Act’s framework for the orderly failure of large, complex, Systemically Important Financial Institutions. With respect to providing feedback to the largest financial institutions on their living will submissions, the Chairman described certain specific actions that firms have been asked to address in their resolution plans, including requiring firms to place a greater focus on reducing the interconnectedness between legal entities and provide greater detail in the public portions of the resolution plans. He also discussed the progress the FDIC has made in: (i) facilitating the orderly resolution of a SIFI under its Title II Orderly Liquidation Authority; and (ii) cross-border coordination on resolution. The Chairman echoed similar remarks made in his speeches at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in May 2015 and at the FDIC Banking Research Conference in September 2015.
View the speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Interim Impact Analysis on Fundamental Review of Trading Book
11/18/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published an interim impact analysis of its fundamental review of the trading book. The analysis used data from 44 banks and assesses the impact of the revisions proposed in previous consultations carried out in 2013 and 2014. The analysis found, amongst other things, that: (i) change in market risk capital charges would produce an increase of 4.7% in the overall Basel III minimum capital requirement; (ii) that such change leads to a 2.3% increase when the bank with the largest value of market risk-weighted assets is excluded from the sample; and (iii) in comparison with the current market risk framework, the standard proposed would result in a weighted average increase of 74% in aggregate market risk capital. The Basel Committee expects to finalize the review before the end of 2015.
View the analysis.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards for Additional Criteria for Preferential Treatment for Intragroup Liquidity
11/18/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards to specify additional criteria for preferential treatment in calculating the Liquidity Coverage Requirement for cross-border intragroup liquidity flows, as required under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR observes that there can at times be a need for intra-group financial support in a case where an institution experiences liquidity difficulties and finds itself under conditions of stress. The draft RTS, amongst other things, specify how liquidity providers and receivers can display a low liquidity risk profile, by for example, a liquidity provider monitoring the liquidity position of the receiver on a daily basis. The draft RTS also detail the binding agreements and commitments that are required for credit and liquidity between group entities. Comments on the consultation are due by January 13, 2016.
View the consultation and draft RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Announces Results of Comprehensive Assessment of Nine Eurozone Banks
11/14/2015
The European Central Bank announced the outcome of its 2015 Comprehensive Assessment of nine banks - Banque Degroof S.A. (Belgium), Sberbank Europe AG (Austria), Unicredit Slovenia (Slovenia), VTB Bank (Austria) AG (Austria), Novo Banco SA (Portugal), Agence Française de Développement (France), J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. (Luxembourg), Medifin Holding Limited (Malta) and Kuntarahoitus Oyj (Municipality Finance plc) (Finland). All banks that become or will become subject to direct prudential supervision by the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism are subject to a Comprehensive Assessment. Capital shortfalls were identified at five of the nine banks: Agence Française de Développement, Medifin Holding Limited, Novo Banco SA, Sberbank Europe AG and VTB Bank AG. Four of these banks have already covered the shortfall. In addition, certain failings in systems and processes were also identified.
View the announcement and results.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Updates Frequently Asked Questions on Brokered Deposits
11/13/2015
The FDIC updated its Frequently Asked Questions regarding brokered deposits. FDIC regulations typically prohibit the acceptance of brokered deposits by FDIC-insured depository institutions that are not well capitalized. The updated FAQs contain revised responses on various topics relating to identifying, accepting and reporting brokered deposits, including but not limited to: (i) the circumstances under which certain business professionals that refer clients to a bank will be considered deposit brokers; (ii) examples of programs that would not be considered brokered deposit programs; and (iii) situations in which contract and dual employees would not be classified as deposit brokers by the FDIC. The FDIC is soliciting comments on the updated document until December 28, 2015.
View the FAQs in “Clean” Format.
View the FAQs in “Track Changes” Format.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Publishes Reports on Post-Crisis Reform and on Implementation of Basel Standards
11/13/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a report to the G20 Leaders, providing an update on finalizing its post-crisis reforms, reviewing the work it has carried out to strengthen the international regulatory framework for banks since the global financial crisis. The report states that the Basel Committee has made good progress in finalizing its post-crisis reforms, which include: (i) carrying out a consultation on proposed revisions to the standardized approaches for credit risk, market risk and operational risk as well as on the design of a capital floor based on these standardised approaches; (ii) finalizing the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements; and (iii) completing its analysis and monitoring of the drivers of variability of risk-weighted assets in the banking book and trading book. The Basel Committee also published a second report to the G20 Leaders, providing an update on the implementation of Basel III standards since its 2014 progress report to the G20 Leaders. The report states that all member jurisdictions have implemented the Basel III risk-based capital regulations and that almost all member jurisdictions have implemented final rules on the liquidity coverage ratio. Work remains ongoing for the adoption of the Basel III standards for the leverage ratio and the net stable funding ratio. The Basel Committee aims to finalize the remaining core elements of the global bank regulatory reform agenda by the end of 2016.
View the reports.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Guidelines on Treatment of Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Under Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process
11/12/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper including draft Guidelines on the treatment of Credit Valuation Adjustment risk further to the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft Guidelines implement the recommendations of the EBA's report on CVAs published in February 2015 and aim to form a common and proportionate approach to determine: (i) the materiality of CVA risk for an institution; (ii) material CVA risk under the SREP; and (iii) adequate additional own fund requirements where risks aren't sufficiently covered. The EBA has also published a data collection exercise for a Quantitative Impact Study to ensure the appropriate calibration of threshold values. The Guidelines will be finalized once the consultation process and QIS are complete. National regulators will then have two months from the date of publication of the translated versions of the guidelines on the EBA website to report whether or not they comply with the Guidelines. Comments on the consultation are due by February 12, 2016. It is expected that the data collection exercise will be completed by January 28, 2016.
View the consultation paper and draft Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Publishes Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Mapping of Credit Assessments by External Credit Assessment Institutions
11/11/2015
The European Banking Authority, European Securities and Markets Authority and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (known as the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities) published two final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Solvency II Directive. The ITS aim to ensure sound credit assessments to encourage financial stability in the EU and determine an objective approach for attributing risk weights to the assessment of ECAIs. The final ITS will replace the Committee of European Banking Supervisors' guidelines on the recognition of ECAIs as well as the existing mappings of ECAIs' credit assessments issued by national regulators. The final draft ITS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement.
View the final draft ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Consults on the Use of Options and Discretions Under Capital Requirements Directive IV
11/11/2015
The European Central Bank published a consultation on harmonizing the exercise of Options and Discretions (O&Ds) available to EU member state national supervisory authorities under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV. Alongside the consultation, the ECB also published a draft Regulation on the exercise of O&Ds, a draft Guide on available O&Ds, an Explanatory Note as well as Q&As. An Option can allow a member state or a national regulator to choose how to comply with a given provision of CRD IV, selecting from a range of alternatives set out in such legislation. A Discretion can allow a national regulator or a member state to choose whether or not to apply a certain provision in CRD IV. The aim of the Regulation is to encourage the harmonization of supervision of significant banks in the Euro area, with the aim of safeguarding the financial stability and integration of the EU banking system. Comments on the consultation are due by December 16, 2015.
View the consultation and related documents.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Updated Supervisory Statement on Internal Ratings Based Approach to Credit Risk
11/11/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published an updated Supervisory Statement on the Internal Ratings Based approaches to credit risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. This is the approach under which certain banks and investment firms with sophisticated risk management systems are allowed to calculate capital requirements based on internally produced parameters. Amongst other things, expectations that have been superseded by decisions or technical standards adopted by the European Commission have been deleted, including on third country equivalence, and expectations for the notification of changes to IRB rating systems have been amended.
View the updated Supervisory Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Capital Requirements for Simple, Transparent and Comparable Securitizations
11/10/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published proposals for the capital treatment of simple, transparent and comparable securitizations which will amend the revised securitization framework published in December 2014. The proposals should be read with the criteria for identifying simple, transparent and comparable securitizations released in July 2015 by the Basel Committee and the International Organization for Securities Commissions. The proposals include the additional criteria that a STC securitization would need to meet in order for lower regulatory capital requirements to apply. Asset-backed commercial paper programmes and synthetic securitizations are excluded from the proposals. Responses to the consultation are due by February 5, 2016. The Basel Committee intends to publish the final standard in 2016. The implementation date will take into account that the revised securitization framework is to be implemented by 2018.
View the consultation paper.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Common Procedures for Information Exchange between National Regulators on Proposed Acquisitions
11/10/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on draft Implementing Technical Standards for common procedures that national regulators in the EU should use when consulting with each other about prudential assessments for proposed acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in credit institutions. The draft ITS set out the proposed process and timeframes for requests of information and includes proposed templates and forms that are to be used by national regulators. Comments on the consultation are due by February 10, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultation on Total Loss Absorbing Capacity Holdings
11/09/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation paper on Total Loss Absorbing Capacity holdings, setting out the proposed prudential treatment of investments in TLAC-qualifying instruments by both Global Systemically Important Banks and non-G-SIBs that are subject to the Basel Committee's standards. The consultation proposes that banks deduct their holdings of TLAC instruments from their regulatory capital, subject to certain thresholds, and seeks to limit contagion within the financial system, should a G-SIB enter into resolution. The consultation also sets out revisions that are required to the text of Basel III, specifying how G-SIBs must take on board TLAC requirements when calculating regulatory capital buffers. Comments are due by February 12, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Announces Details of 2016 EU-Wide Stress Test
11/05/2015
The European Banking Authority published the details of its 2016 EU-wide stress test exercise that will be launched in the first quarter of 2016. The names of the 53 EU banks that will take part in the exercise have been published, of which 39 fall under the jurisdiction of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The stress test will cover broadly more than 70% of the EU banking sector and will assess the ability of EU banks to meet relevant supervisory capital ratios in the event of adverse economic conditions. The EBA also published its draft methodological note for discussion together with a draft template to be used as part of the stress test exercise. The results of the stress tests will be published in the third quarter of 2016.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Stability Board Publishes Updated List of Global Systemically Important Banks for 2015
11/03/2015
The Financial Stability Board published an updated list of banks identified by the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as Global Systemically Important Banks. The list, which is updated on an annual basis, sets out 30 banks that are considered to be G-SIBs. Compared to the list of G-SIBs identified in 2014, China Construction Bank has been added and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria has been removed. The next updated list will be published in 2016.
View the list of G-SIBs.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Highlights Increasing Credit Risk
11/02/2015
The US Comptroller of the Currency, Thomas J. Curry, once more discussed the issue of increased credit risk confronting the federal banking system during the Risk Management Associations' Annual Risk Management Conference. He argued that credit quality issues are a rising concern because banks are beginning to increase their risk appetite and are taking on additional credit risk. He notes that credit risk is increasing in two forms: relaxed credit underwriting and increased loan concentrations. In his statement, Comptroller Curry recommended that banks take initiative to address concentration risk on their own and also review more closely their loan loss allowance levels to determine whether it is appropriate in relation to the level of credit risk within the bank's loan portfolio.
View Comptroller Curry's remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Proposes New Rule to Implement TLAC and Related Requirements
10/30/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System proposed a rule, in consultation with the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, requiring the largest US Global Systemically Important Banking Organizations (known as G-SIBs) and the US Intermediate Holding Companies of foreign G-SIBs to maintain a minimum amount of unsecured long-term debt and a minimum amount of “Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity” as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets. Generally, TLAC is intended to increase the resiliency of an organization by providing a significant capital buffer comprised of regulatory capital and certain eligible debt, together with related capital buffers. The long-term debt, once converted to equity, is aimed at absorbing losses and recapitalizing the covered entity's subsidiaries in resolution. There are four major components of the proposed rule: (i) external long-term debt and related TLAC requirements applicable to the top holding company of a US G-SIB; (ii) internal long-term debt and related TLAC requirements applicable to covered US IHCs; (iii) clean holding company requirements; and (iv) regulatory capital deductions applicable to certain investments in long term debt of covered G-SIBs. Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board is requesting comment on internal TLAC requirements for US G-SIBs. Once finalized, the rules would apply to 8 US G-SIBs and their related entities as well as IHCs controlled by non-US G-SIBs. Banking organizations covered by the rule would be required to comply with most of the proposed requirements by January 1, 2019. The calibration of the risk-weighted assets component of the external TLAC requirement would be phased in over a three-year period commencing on January 1, 2019.
View the proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Adopts Proposed Rule to Increase Deposit Insurance Fund to Statutorily Required Level
10/22/2015
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued for public comment a proposal to increase the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund to the statutorily required minimum level of 1.35 percent. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act increased the minimum for the reserve ratio from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent and required the ratio to reach the new minimum by September 30, 2020. Moreover, the Dodd-Frank Act made this increase the responsibility of large banks with $10 billion or more in total assets. In effect, the proposed rule, if finalized, would impose upon banks a quarterly surcharge of 4.5 cents per $100 of their assessment base, with certain adjustments. It is expected that the surcharges will commence in 2016 and the reserve ratio would reach 1.35 percent following approximately eight quarters of payments of such surcharges (i.e. in advance of the required 2020 date). Comments on the proposed rule will be due 60 days after the rule is published in the Federal Register.
View the proposed rule.
View the FDIC Chairman’s statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consultation on Remuneration Requirements under CRD IV
10/22/2015
The European Commission published a consultation on the possible impact of the maximum remuneration ratio rule for variable and fixed remuneration required by the Capital Requirements Directive. The consultation also addresses the overall efficiency of the remuneration rules as set out in the CRD and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. The consultation aims to obtain views on the remuneration provisions of CRD IV, including on: (i) the efficiency, implementation and enforcement of the principle of proportionality, as well as the identification of any gaps arising from the application of the principle; (ii) compliance with the maximum ratio rule for variable and fixed remuneration as prescribed by the CRD; and (iii) the impact of the maximum ratio rule on competitiveness, financial stability and staff in non-EEA countries. The Commission must report back to the European Parliament and Council by June 30, 2016. Responses are due by January 14, 2016.
View the European Commission's consultation page.
View the consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Comptroller of the Currency Discusses Credit Risk
10/21/2015
The Comptroller of the Currency, Thomas J. Curry, in a speech before the Exchequer Club, discussed the increasing credit risk in the federal banking system. Comptroller Curry believes the financial system is currently at a point in the market cycle where loan underwriting standards are weakening and credit risk is becoming an increasing point of focus. He stated, “...we should be asking whether banks have the appropriate risk management processes and structures in place to measure, monitor and control the increased credit risk they are taking on.” In his remarks, the Comptroller mentioned leveraged lending and auto lending as two specific products of concern.
View the press release.
View the Comptroller’s remarks.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Approach to Stress Testing the UK Banking System
10/21/2015
The Bank of England published its approach to stress testing and evaluating the resilience of the UK banking system and set out its plans in this regard for the next three years. The BoE's approach will include the introduction of an annual cyclical scenario, assessing risks to the banking system that derive from financial cycles, taking into account domestic, global and markets elements. This annual cyclical scenario will include all PRA-regulated banks and building societies with total retail deposits greater than £50 billion, on an individual or consolidated basis, at a firm's financial year end date. Currently, this means the following firms will be included: Barclays plc, HSBC Holdings Group, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide Building Society, Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Santander UK plc and Standard Chartered Bank Group. UK subsidiaries of foreign-owned investment banks will be excluded. Every other year, the BoE will also biannually explore scenarios that are unrelated to the financial cycle and for which risks to financial stability and individual banks are deemed to be emerging. Therefore, in 2016, there will be a European Banking Authority stress test and a UK cyclical scenario test. In 2017, there will be both a UK cyclical and exploratory scenario test (for the first time). In 2018, the BoE intends to only run a UK cyclical scenario test. The results of the 2015 UK stress test are expected to be published on December 1, 2015.
View the BoE's approach to stress testing.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Reports on EU Capital Requirements for Covered Bonds
10/20/2015
The European Commission published its report to the European Parliament and the Council on the capital requirements for covered bonds as incorporated in the Capital Requirements Regulation. Under CRR, for banks investing in covered bonds that meet certain criteria a preferential risk weights is applied. The Commission is required to report on the appropriateness of: (i) the preferential risk weights taking into account types of cover assets, level of transparency on the cover pool and the impact of the covered bond issuance on the issuer's unsecured creditors; (ii) extending the preferential risk weights to covered bonds secured by certain aircraft loans; (iii) including covered bonds guaranteed by residential loans as eligible assets; (iv) the derogation for covered bonds backed by securitization instruments; and (v) the derogation for covered bonds backed by other covered bonds. The Commission considers the European Banking Authority's recommendations on the EU covered bond framework published in 2014 and sets out where it agrees with those recommendations and its proposed steps to implement them, including consulting with stakeholders on proposed changes to the legislative requirements. The Commission's recent consultation on the EU's covered bond framework under the Capital Markets Union initiative is also relevant and will impact on how the capital treatment for covered bonds is revised.
View the Commission's Report.
View the EBA's Report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Identifying Other Systemically Important Institutions
10/19/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority launched a consultation on its proposed criteria and methodology for identifying other systemically important institutions, i.e. institutions that are not classed as globally systematically important financial institutions but whose failure would have a significant negative effect on the UK financial system. According to the Capital Requirements Directive, national regulators are required to identify O-SIIs that are banks, investment firms or mixed financial holding companies incorporated in their jurisdiction. That requirement derives from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision framework for domestic systemically important banks or D-SIBs. In developing its proposals, the PRA states that it has to take into account the relevant EBA Guidelines on the assessment of O-SIIs. The PRA must identify as O-SIIs those firms whose distress or failure would have a systemic impact on the UK or EU economy or financial system due to size, importance, complexity, cross-border activity and interconnectedness. Firms that are designated as O-SIIs by the PRA will be subject to enhanced supervision by the PRA. However, the PRA considers that O-SIIs are likely to be those firms that are currently subject to PRA supervision as a Category 1 firm and therefore there will be minimal impact on the firms. The PRA intends to publish the first list of O-SIIs in Q1 2016 and thereafter annually by December 1, each year. The consultation is open until January 18, 2016. The PRA will publish its final Statement of Policy in Q1 2016.
View the PRA consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Issues Guidance on Examinations of Insured Depository Institutions Prior to Membership as, or Merger Resulting in, a State Member Bank
10/13/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued guidance intended to clarify the criteria and process used by the Federal Reserve Board in determining whether to waive or to conduct pre-membership safety-and-soundness and consumer compliance examinations of insured depository institutions that are looking to either: (i) become state chartered member banks of the Federal Reserve System; or (ii) merge with another institution where a state member bank would be the surviving entity, including those with $10 billion or less in total consolidated assets. Specifically, the Federal Reserve Board stated that a state nonmember bank, national bank, or savings association seeking to convert its status to a state member bank will not generally be required to complete a safety-and-soundness or consumer compliance examination prior to the conversion if the institution seeking membership meets the criteria for "eligible bank," as set forth in the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation H, together with certain additional safety and soundness criteria set forth in the guidance (collectively, the "eligibility criteria"). Under circumstances where an insured depository institution is looking to merge with another institution where a state member bank would be the surviving entity, a safety-and-soundness or consumer compliance examination of the insured depository institution will not be required so long as the state member bank meets all of the eligibility criteria on an existing and pro-forma basis.
View the guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Regulation Correcting Regulatory Technical Standards on Securitization Retention under Capital Requirements Regulation
10/08/2015
A Delegated Regulation correcting the text of the Regulatory Technical Standards on requirements for investor, sponsor, original lenders and originator institutions for exposures to transferred credit risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Minor errors were made in the RTS published in various languages of the EU, and the revisions correct such errors, including clarifying that materially relevant data does not have to be provided to investors at an individual loan level in all circumstances and that it may be sufficient to provide such data on an aggregate basis in certain circumstances. The Delegated Regulation enters into force on October 28, 2015.
View the Delegated Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Announced Approval of Applications by Royal Bank of Canada and RBC USA Holdco Corporation
10/07/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced the approval of the applications by Royal Bank of Canada and its subsidiary, RBC USA Holdco Corporation, to acquire City National Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, City National Bank, under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act. City National is a $33 billion banking organization. The Federal Reserve Board’s approval comes approximately seven months after submission of the application, which was the subject of comments opposing the application. On the same day, the Federal Reserve Board approved the application by Royal Bank of Canada to establish a limited federal branch in New Jersey. As a limited federal branch, it will only take deposits permitted to be taken by an Edge corporation under section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act.
View the press release announcing the approval of the acquisition.
View the Federal Reserve Board order approving the acquisition.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release approving the limited branch.
View the Federal Reserve Board order approving the limited branch.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines on Management of Interest Rate Risk Arising from Non-Trading Activities
10/06/2015
The European Banking Authority published final translations of its Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities, also known as interest rate risk in the banking book or IRRBB, which is the risk to firms arising from adverse movements in interest rates. Under the Capital Requirements Directive, national regulators must require a firm to take measures if its economic value declines by more than 20 per cent of their own funds as a result of a sudden and unexpected change in interest rates of 200 basis points which is termed supervisory "standard shock". National regulators must also take steps when a change occurs, as defined by the EBA in these Guidelines. The Guidelines set out the definition of such change and the methods for the calculation of the outcome of the supervisory "standard shock", which is the shock applied to a firm's portfolio to determine the impact on the economic value of the firm, as well as specify the identification, management and mitigation of IRRBB. The Guidelines apply from January 1, 2016. They will repeal the Guidelines of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors published in 2006. The Guidelines are addressed to national regulators and relevant credit institutions and investment firms. National regulators must notify the EBA by December 7, 2015 as to whether they comply or intend to comply with the Guidelines.
View the Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Issues Report on Regulatory Consistency of Risk-weighted Assets for Counterparty Credit Risk
10/01/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a report relating to the regulatory consistency of Risk-Weighted Assets for counterparty credit risk. This report is part of the BCBS’s wider Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program, which is intended to ensure consistent implementation of the Basel III framework. The report examines variability in banks’ modeling of derivatives, specifically exposure modeling, by presenting findings from a hypothetical test portfolio exercise. The report concentrates on the internal models method and the advanced credit valuation adjustments risk capital charge for OTC derivative trades. This report completes the BCBS’s review, in respect of trading-related internal models, and follows two earlier exercises that focused on market risk RWAs that were published in January 2013 and December 2013. In the report, the BCBS presents key findings, lists a number of observed good practices, and highlights areas where banks and supervisors may seek to harmonize practices to reduce variability in outcomes.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
President of the US Federal Reserve Bank of New York Delivers Speech on Regulation and Liquidity Provision
09/30/2015
William C. Dudley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the US Federal Reserve Bank of New York, delivered a speech at the SIFMA Liquidity Forum reiterating the need to strike a proper balance between sound regulation and liquidity in financial markets. Specifically, his remarks examined market liquidity in two important fixed-income markets: the US Treasury market and the US corporate bond market. He discussed, among other things, methods on how to measure liquidity, evidence of how liquidity has changed in recent years, factors that could influence liquidity provision, and costs associated with shifts in liquidity. Dudley expressed his support for the recommendations in the recently issued interagency report on the October 15, 2014 Treasury market flash rally, including the need to better understand the implications of the evolving Treasury market structure and liquidity and how changes in regulation and market structure influence liquidity conditions more generally. Specifically, he called for study and data analysis as to whether there is a decrease in liquidity and/or an increase in liquidity risk that is costly or poses a risk to financial stability and whether regulation can be altered to improve the balance between enhancing financial stability and the costs of such regulation, including adverse impacts on liquidity.
View the speech.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Announces Approval of Applications by M&T Bank Corporation to Acquire Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.
09/30/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced its approval of the applications by: (i) M&T Bank Corporation to acquire Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.; and (ii) by M&T’s subsidiary bank, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, to merge with Hudson City Savings Bank. Upon consummation of the transactions, M&T will have consolidated assets of approximately $132.5 billion, making it the 25th largest insured depository organization in the United States (currently it is 31st). M&T agreed to purchase Hudson City and submitted applications to the Federal Reserve Board in respect of the transaction in 2012. However, the Federal Reserve Board initially identified weaknesses in M&T’s risk management program, including issues in M&T’s Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering compliance management program and its consumer compliance program and thus postponed consideration of the deal at M&T’s request until M&T was able to remediate these concerns.
View the press release.
View the Order.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Supervisory Statement on Reports Provided by Skilled Persons
09/30/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published an updated Supervisory Statement on reports provided by skilled persons under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Under FSMA, the PRA may appoint, or may require a firm or a certain individual to appoint a skilled person to provide the PRA with a report giving an independent view of a firm's activity. This is part of the PRA's supervisory approach to firms, to identify, assess or prevent risks, track the development of previously identified risks or to use as part of possible remedial measures. The Supervisory Statement is to be read alongside the Use of Skilled Persons Part of the PRA Rulebook, which specifies the rules on contracts entered into with skilled persons. The updated Supervisory Statement provides greater clarity on the use of a skilled person as part of the PRA's supervisory approach and in particular as a discretionary supervisory tool. The Supervisory Statement includes: (i) the PRA's considerations when appointing a skilled person; (ii) the PRA's considerations when determining whether it should use its powers under FSMA to obtain a report by a skilled person or to appoint a skilled person to collect or update information; and (iii) the PRA's expectations of an appointed skilled person.
View the Supervisory Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report Analysing Asset Encumbrance for EU banks
09/30/2015
The European Banking Authority published its first analysis on asset encumbrance for EU banks, using data received from the 200 banks that provide it with such data. This first analysis initiates the regular monitoring of levels of asset encumbrance at EU level and future reports will be published annually. The analysis aims to assist supervisors in assessing how banks manage funding stress as well as the impact that switching from unsecured to secured funding might have on banks in conditions of stress. The report is based on data received for December 2014 and March 2015 further to a requirement under the Capital Requirements Regulation for banks to report levels of repurchase agreements, securities lending and all forms of asset encumbrance to national regulators. The analysis shows that the overall weighted average encumbrance ratio was 27% in March 2015, with ratios at country level that range from 0% for Estonia and 44% in Denmark and Greece. The report shows there has been no increase in levels of asset encumbrance over the past four years, based on a comparison with a similar report released by the European Systemic Risk Board in 2011.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Publishes Proposed Legislative Package to Revive EU Securitization Markets
09/30/2015
The European Commission published two proposed Regulations as part of its Capital Markets Union initiative which aim to revive the EU securitization markets. The proposed Regulation on common rules on securitization and creating a European framework for simple, transparent and standardized securitization (referred to as STS Securitization) sets out the eligibility criteria for STS securitizations such as risk retention rules, due diligence and disclosure requirements. The proposed Regulation also includes requirements for supervisory requirements, amendments to other EU legislation to ensure consistency, an exemption, subject to certain criteria being met, from the clearing obligation for OTC derivative contracts entered into by covered bond entities and securitization special purpose entities and rules on third country securitizations. The second proposed Regulation would amend the Capital Requirements Regulation to revise capital requirements for banks and investment firms originating, sponsoring or investing in securitizations. The objective of the proposals is to align the CRR provisions with the revised Basel framework of 2014 as was recommended by the European Banking Authority in its report on qualifying securitizations in July. The proposed revisions to CRR seek to adopt a more risk-sensitive approach to STS securitization which is currently in the early stages of development at international level. Both legislative proposals are subject to the European legislative process.
View the proposed STS Securitization Regulation.
View the proposed CRR Amendment Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Announces Publication Date for Results of 2015 Stress Test
09/28/2015
The Bank of England announced the timetable for publication of the results of the 2015 UK stress test, which aims to evaluate the resilience of the UK banking system. The stress test covers seven major UK banks and building societies, namely Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide, Royal Bank of Scotland, Santander UK, and Standard Chartered. The Financial Policy Committee and Board of the Prudential Regulation Authority will make their final decisions on the results of the stress tests on November 30, 2015 and will revert to the relevant firms on the same day. The results will then be published on December 1, 2015.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines under Capital Requirements Directive
09/28/2015
The European Banking Authority published final translations of its Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process under the Capital Requirements Directive. The Guidelines include: (i) an overview of the common SREP framework; (ii) details on how regulators are to apply the principle of proportionality in their supervisory engagements with different types of firms; (iii) overall risk management and governance arrangements; and (iv) regular monitoring of key financial and non-financial indicators for changes in financial conditions and risk profiles of firms. National regulators must notify the EBA by February 20, 2016 as to whether they comply or intend to comply with the Guidelines.
View the Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Fiscal Year 2016 Bank Supervision Operating Plan
09/25/2015
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released its bank supervision operating plan for fiscal year 2016. Generally, the operating plan identifies the OCC's bank supervision priorities and objectives for the year and guides the development of supervisory strategies for national banks and federal savings associations. According to the plan, supervisory strategies for fiscal year 2016 will focus on: (i) business model and strategy changes; (ii) compliance; (iii) credit risk and loan underwriting; (iv) cybersecurity and resiliency planning; and (v) interest rate risk.
View the press release.
View the operating plan.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opinion on Draft Technical Standards on Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics
09/25/2015
The European Banking Authority published an opinion on the European Commission's proposal to amend the final draft Implementing Technical Standards on additional liquidity monitoring metrics under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The metrics aim to provide regulators with a more comprehensive liquidity risk profile of a firm according to the nature, scale and complexity of its activities. The Commission had proposed for the maturity ladder templates and instructions to be removed, due to these being based on the provisional approach to reporting requirements under the CRR and so that the ITS are adapted to the new and more detailed definition of liquid assets which becomes applicable from October 1, 2015. The EBA's opinion states that the benefits of having the maturity ladder as initially proposed rather than not having a harmonised tool at all for the next two years (which is the estimated time required to update the ITS and have them adopted by the Commission and implemented by institutions) are greater. If the maturity ladder is kept in the final ITS, the EBA will proceed promptly with an updated ITS, bringing them into line with the new liquidity provisions. The EBA also supports the Commission's suggestion to amend the date of application of the ITS from July 1, 2015 to January 1, 2016. A revised draft of the ITS is included in the annex to the Opinion.
View the Opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Guidelines on Application of Definition of Default under the Capital Requirements Regulation
09/22/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on its draft Guidelines specifying the application of the definition of default in relation to the Internal Ratings Based Approach and the Standardized Approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft Guidelines aim to harmonise the definition of default across the EU framework so that EU banks apply regulatory requirements to their capital positions in a more consistent, comparable and uniform way. The draft Guidelines provide clarification for the definition of default, also covering issues such as indications of unlikeliness to pay, the days past due criterion for default identification and the conditions for a return to non-default status. Comments are due by January 22, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delegated Regulations on Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation Published in Official Journal of the European Union
09/19/2015
Two delegated regulations on Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation were published in the Official Journal of the European Union:- The delegated regulation for the disclosure of information for the compliance of institutions with the requirement for a countercyclical capital buffer which sets out the specifications for the disclosures required by firms for compliance with their requirements for a countercyclical capital buffer; and
- The delegated regulation for the transitional treatment of equity exposures under the Internal Ratings-Based approach which states that national regulators may grant certain firms with exemptions from the IRB treatment where the categories of the firm's equity exposures were already benefiting from an exemption from the IRB treatment on December 31, 2013.
View the Delegated Regulation for Disclosure.
View the Delegated Regulation for Transitional Treatment of Equity Exposures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes New Taxonomy for Supervisory Reporting
09/09/2015
The European Banking Authority published the new taxonomy for national regulators to provide data to the EBA under the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting. The new taxonomy will be used for the first reports under the revised Liquidity and Leverage Ratio requirements and includes revised reporting structures for leverage ratio, and new parallel reporting structures for liquidity ratio for banks.
View the EBA announcement and taxonomy.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Revised List of Validation Rules for Supervisory Reporting Issued by European Banking Authority
09/09/2015
The European Banking Authority published a revised list of validation rules for submitting supervisory reporting data. The rules detail the standards and formats that are to be used for submissions of data by national regulators under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. The revised list displays the rules that have been deactivated due to technical issues or incorrectness.
View the EBA announcement and revised rules.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Approve Bank of America to Begin Using Advanced Approaches Framework to Calculate Risk-Based Capital Requirements
09/03/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced their approval of Bank of America and its subsidiary national banks to use the “advanced approaches” capital framework. The advanced approaches framework requires banks to meet certain criteria for risk-measurement and risk-management when calculating risk-based capital standards as developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. In order to use the advanced approaches framework, banks are required to conduct a satisfactory “parallel run” under the framework in order to show the relevant regulators that the bank is able to comply with the framework for at least four consecutive calendar quarters. Bank of America, along with its subsidiary national banks, fulfilled the parallel run requirement and will begin using the advanced approaches framework to calculate and disclose their risk-based capital measures beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015.
View the FRB press release.
View the OCC press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Issues Call for Advice on Net Stable Funding Requirements and Leverage Ratio
08/19/2015
The European Banking Authority issued a press release stating that it will conduct an analysis on the Net Stable Funding Requirements and Leverage Ratio under the Capital Requirements Regulation. This analysis is further to a recent call for advice issued by the European Commission to the EBA, seeking the EBA’s guidance so that it can prepare legislative proposals, if necessary, on technical issues that are not explicitly mentioned in the CRR. The Commission is seeking the EBA’s analysis on whether it is adequate to establish different NSFR and LR requirements for different types of institutions. This analysis would consider whether different firms could have, depending on their risk profile, size and business model: (i) different NSFR calibrations; (ii) simplified NSFR and LR requirements; or (iii) exemptions from the NSFR and LR requirements. The Commission also seeks analysis on other issues including: (i) the costs and benefits of excluding certain types of firms from the NSFR and LR requirements; (ii) the effects of the NSFR requirements on bank lending in the EU; and (iii) the impact of the NSFR on clearing, settlement and custody activities, on underwriting and market making, on business models and financing structures of institutions as well as on its interaction with risk-based capital requirements. The EBA must submit the reports on the NSFR and LR to the Commission by December 31, 2015 and October 31, 2016 respectively, although it plans to submit the LR report by July 2016.
View the EBA's press release.
View the European Commission's Call for Advice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Further Rulebook Parts
08/14/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on proposals to transfer additional parts of the PRA rules that are in the FS Handbook into the stand-alone PRA Rulebook. The PRA is reshaping the materials inherited from the Financial Services Authority to create a Rulebook which contains PRA rules only and follows the split of the FSA into the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority. The current consultation covers rules for financial conglomerates, third country groups, group risk systems and regulatory reporting. The consultation closes on November 13, 2015. It is expected that the new online PRA Rulebook will be available before the end of 2015.
View the consultation paper.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Intends to Amend Draft Technical Standards on Additional Monitoring Metrics for Liquidity Reporting
08/06/2015
The European Commission issued a press release dated July 24, 2015 announcing its intention to amend the draft Implementing Technical Standards on additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft ITS set the amount and quality of capital that a bank must hold to absorb losses and also sets a general liquidity requirement for banks. The main amendment to the draft ITS concerns the removal of the “maturity ladder” template and its related instructions. This template lists the maturity of liquid assets as well as the expected timing of cash inflows and outflows for firms according to 22 timelines ranging from overnight to over 10 years. The amendment will ensure that the draft ITS aligns with the definition of “liquid assets” in the Commission’s Delegated Regulation on the liquidity coverage requirement for banks which includes the liquidity coverage ratio and the liquidity buffer. The Commission also intends to amend the proposed date of application of the draft ITS from July 1, 2015 to January 1, 2016.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consultation on Exclusion of Transactions with Non-EU Non-Financial Counterparties from Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk
08/05/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper including draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the procedures for excluding a firm’s transactions with Non-Financial Counterparties established in non-EU countries from the own funds requirements for Credit Valuation Adjustment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. A firm’s transaction with a NFC is excluded from the own funds requirements for CVA risk under the CRR, whether or not the NFC is established in the EU. This is the case as long as transactions do not exceed the clearing threshold specified in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. As NFCs established in non-EU countries are not subject directly to EU regulation, the draft RTS clarify that firms are responsible for: (i) taking the necessary steps to identify all NFCs under this exemption and calculating accordingly their own funds requirements for CVA risk; (ii) ensuring that exempt counterparties established outside the EU would qualify as NFCs if they were established in the EU; and (iii) ensuring that counterparties calculate the clearing threshold according to the relevant provisions in EMIR and do not exceed those thresholds. The draft RTS align the treatment of NFCs established in a non-EU country with the treatment of NFCs established in the EU. Comments are due by November 5, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Assesses Level of Prudential Rules under Capital Requirements Legislation
08/05/2015
The European Commission published a report on its assessment of the appropriateness of the rules governing the levels of application of the prudential requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation, together CRD IV. In the EU, subject to certain exceptions, the supervision of a banking group which includes several banks or investment firms is undertaken at the level of the entire banking group (so called consolidated supervision) as well as at the individual level. The outcome of the assessment is that the Commission does not think that it is appropriate to propose amendments to the rules at this time as consideration needs to be given to the impact of the Single Supervisory Mechanism, implementation of the liquidity coverage requirement and the application of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Issues Risk Management Guidance
08/04/2015 | http://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2015/bulletin-2015-36.html.Topic : Prudential Regulation
-
European Banking Authority Call for Evidence on Capital Charges for Lending to Small and Medium Enterprises
07/31/2015The European Banking Authority published a call for evidence under the Capital Requirements Regulation on Small and Medium Enterprises and the related capital reduction for loans to SMEs, also known as the Supporting Factor. The Supporting Factor allows banks to counterbalance the rise in capital resulting from the capital conservation buffer. Under the CRR, banks should use the capital relief produced through the Supporting Factor exclusively to provide an adequate flow of credit to SMEs in the European Union. The call for evidence aims to collect views from stakeholders and the industry to contribute to the report to the European Commission on lending trends and lending conditions for SMEs, as well as the potential risks associated with SMEs in the context of capital reduction. The final report on SMEs and the Supporting Factor will be published by the EBA in the first quarter of 2016. Responses to the call for evidence are due by October 1, 2015.
View the call for evidence.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Amendments to Templates for Supervisory Reporting Published in Official Journal of the European Union
07/31/2015
An Amending Regulation which amends the Regulation with Implementing Technical Standards on instructions, templates and definitions for the supervisory reporting of institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendments do not include any substantive changes to the original Regulation and relate only to the replacement of templates in the annexes of the Regulation. The changes aim to enhance precision in the submission, definitions and instructions relating to the supervisory reporting of institutions.
View the Amending Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Proposes Changes to Report for Foreign Branches of US Banks and Savings Associations
07/29/2015
The US Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, a formal interagency body that prescribes reporting standards for financial institutions, of which the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "agencies") are members, approved for publication a proposal to extend, with certain revisions (including revisions to the officer declaration requirement), the Foreign Branch Report of Condition (FFIEC 030 and FFIEC 030S).
The FFIEC 030 collects information regarding the structure and geographic distribution of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet data of foreign branches of insured US banks and savings associations. The FFIEC 030S (the Abbreviated Foreign Branch Report of Condition) collects financial data items for smaller, less complex branches. Included in the proposed revisions is an amendment to the officer declaration requirement. Currently, the report must be signed by an officer who states that the report is true and correct to the best of his or her belief. The amendments would make explicit a requirement that the officer who signs the declaration must be an officer of the parent US institution, and the new form of declaration would state not only that it is true and correct to the best of the officer’s knowledge and belief, but also that the report has been prepared in conformance with FFIEC instructions. Other amendments would reduce the required information if the single-country consolidation option is elected and add a field on the cover page for the institution to indicate whether the branch meets the criteria for annual or quarterly filing. The proposal would be effective as of the December 31, 2015 report date. Comments are due by September 28, 2015.
View the proposal.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes New Policies on Setting Pillar 2 Capital Requirements
07/29/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published: (i) a Policy Statement on assessing capital adequacy under Pillar 2; (ii) a Statement of Policy on the PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital; (iii) a Supervisory Statement on Pillar 2 reporting; and (iv) a Supervisory Statement on the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process that must be undertaken by firms and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process conducted by the PRA. The documents are applicable to banks, building societies and PRA-designated firms. Pillar 2 aims to ensure that firms have sufficient capital to cover potential risks not sufficiently addressed in the prescriptive Pillar 1 requirements. The Pillar 2 framework enters into force on January 1, 2016. The PRA's Policy Statement on assessing capital adequacy under Pillar 2 contains feedback received on its consultation paper of January 2015 on proposals to enhance transparency and accountability in setting Pillar 2 capital requirements. The Policy Statement explains that firms must carry out an ICAAP in accordance with the PRA's rules and it is not sufficient to only replicate the PRA's methodologies as the ICAAP is the responsibility of a firm's management body.
View the Policy Statement.
View the Statement of Policy.
View the Supervisory Statement on Pillar 2 reporting.
View the Supervisory Statement on the ICAAP and SREP.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Key Information on Global Systemically Important Institutions and Other Large Banks in the EU
07/28/2015
The European Banking Authority published a table setting out metrics to identify Global Systemically Important Institutions in the EU. The table sets out the size, interconnectedness, substitutability, complexity and cross-jurisdictional activity of the largest 37 banks in the EU whose leverage ratio exposure measure exceeded €200 billion in 2014. This information is disclosed annually by the EBA. G-SIIs are subject to higher capital requirements and their identification as G-SIIs is the responsibility of their national regulator. A higher capital requirement applies one year after the publication by the national regulator of a bank’s scoring result, allowing the bank sufficient time to adjust to the new buffer requirement.
View the EBA press release and chart.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Reports on Consistency of Risk-Weighted Approaches and Calculation of Counterparty Credit Risk Exposures and Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk
07/22/2015
The European Banking Authority published two reports on the findings of two benchmarking exercises conducted under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. The exercises aim to assess and improve the consistency and comparability of Risk-Weighted Assets across large EU banks. The first report deals with findings on internal approaches applied for the calculation of RWAs for Low Default Portfolios across large EU firms. The study found that 75 percent of the observed differences in Global Charge levels across institutions can be explained by the proportion of defaulted exposures in a portfolio and portfolio mix. When each portfolio is looked at separately, the impact of defaulted exposures explains around 50 percent of GC differences for both large corporate and institutions portfolios. The remaining 50 percent could be attributed to bank-specific issues such as Internal Ratings-Based parameters or risk management practices. Data was collected from 41 institutions for this study. The study was based only on draft technical standards. The report states that more in-depth analysis is required on the impact of collateral on internal loss-given-default estimates as well as comparisons between the IRB and standardized approaches. The second report deals with the internal approaches applied for Counterparty Credit Risk exposures under the Internal Model Method and Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk according to the Advanced Approach. This study was carried out using data collected by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision and shows significant variability in the calculation of CCR and CVAR when using the IMM across banks, especially where equity and foreign exchange OTC derivatives are concerned.
View the press release and both reports.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority to Propose Legislative Initiative to Improve Consistency of Assessment of Bank Management
07/22/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report, dated June 16, 2015, following a peer review of the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders in banks. The EU Capital Requirements Directive provides that a bank must have at least two suitable persons who effectively direct the business. The EBA Guidelines set out the criteria and processes for banks and their supervisors to follow when assessing the suitability of proposed and appointed members of the management body and provisions for the assessment of key function holders. The peer review results show that national regulators mostly apply the EBA Guidelines, that best practices have been identified but that there is no harmonized practice amongst EU Member States in many areas of the Guidelines. The EBA intends to set out best practices in a revised version of the EBA Guidelines and to recommend a legislative initiative on certain points to ensure further alignment of practices among Member States.
View the report.
View the EBA Guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues G-SIB Surcharge Final Rule
07/20/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a final rule under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requiring all US bank holding companies with $250 billion or more in consolidated total assets or $10 billion or more in consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign exposures to annually calculate their systemic importance using the methodology in the final rule. BHCs that meet the “G-SIB threshold” will be required to hold additional common equity tier 1 capital (the “G-SIB surcharge”) as an addition to the capital conservation buffer under the Federal Reserve’s minimum risk-based capital requirements. Eight US firms are currently expected to qualify as G-SIBs under the final rule. Similar to the proposed rule, under the final rule, estimated surcharges for the eight G-SIBs range from 1.0 to 4.5 percent of each firm’s total risk-weighted assets. Failure to meet the G-SIB surcharge will result in limitations on a G-SIB’s ability to make certain capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The Final Rule is generally similar to the proposed rule issued in December 2014 and is largely based on, but stricter than, an international standard adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The G-SIB surcharge will be phased in starting in 2016, and will become fully effective on January 1, 2019.
View the press release.
View the final rule.
View the Shearman & Sterling client publication.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Sets Interim LCR Reporting Requirements
07/20/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Supervisory Statement setting out the liquidity coverage requirement reporting standards which firm's will need to comply with on an interim basis between October 1, 2015, the date the LCR applies under the original implementing technical standards, and the date of the new LCR requirements come into effect following the adoption by the European Commission of revised ITS on liquidity reporting. Firms are required to submit LCR data to national regulators under the CRR and CRD. The PRA considers that firms should report their LCR positions in the interim period so that their liquidity resilience can be monitored. However, if firms report their LCR positions according to the provisions of the original ITS, their LCR positions will not be properly determined. Therefore, the PRA has set out in the Supervisory Statement the data that firms are required to submit in the interim period.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Final Order that Establishes Enhanced Prudential Standards for General Electric Capital Corporation
07/20/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a final order establishing enhanced prudential standards for General Electric Capital Corporation. GECC is a nonbank financial company designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council for supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. The final order establishes the application of enhanced prudential standards in two phases due to the recent announcement by General Electric – the parent company of GECC – of its plan to shrink GECC’s systemic footprint and only retain businesses that support GE’s core business. Enhanced prudential standards for GECC are similar to those applicable to large bank holding companies with certain alterations to reflect GECC’s unique business model. Enhanced prudential standards include capital requirements, capital-planning and stress-testing, liquidity requirements, and risk-management and risk-committee requirements. GECC must begin compliance with relevant requirements from January 1, 2016.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Proposes Rule to Modify Capital Planning and Stress Testing Regulations
07/17/2015The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System proposed a rule modifying its regulations for capital planning and stress testing. Specific changes include altering the timing for several requirements that have not yet been integrated into the stress testing framework. Notably, banks subject to the supplementary leverage ratio would not be required to incorporate the ratio into their stress testing until the 2017 cycle. Additionally, all banks would continue to use standardized risk-weighted assets for capital planning and stress testing while the use of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets (applicable to banks with more than $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion in on-balance sheet foreign exposures) would be delayed indefinitely. The proposal would also remove the requirement that banking organizations calculate a tier 1 common capital ratio. Currently, banks are required to project post-stress regulatory capital ratios in their stress tests using the tier 1 common capital ration, but as the common equity tier 1 capital ratio becomes fully phased in under the Federal Reserve Board’s regulatory capital rule, it would generally require more capital than the tier 1 common capital ratio. The Federal Reserve Board only expected the tier 1 common capital ratio to remain in force until the common equity tier 1 capital requirement was adopted. The proposed changes would take effect for the 2016 capital plan and stress testing cycles. Comments on the proposal will be accepted through September 24, 2015. The Federal Reserve Board is also currently considering several issues related to its capital plan and stress testing rules and any modifications relating to these issues will be effected through a separate rulemaking, with changes thereunder taking effect no earlier than the 2017 cycle.
View the press release.
View the proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Amending Standards under Capital Requirements Legislation
07/16/2015
The EBA published (i) amending Regulatory Technical Standards on the treatment of non-delta risk of options in the standardized market risk approach; and (ii) amending RTS on the criteria to identify categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on a firm’s risk profile. According to the EBA, the amendments are necessary corrections following changes introduced by the European Commission during the legal adoption process of the original RTS. The RTS were prepared under the CRR and CRD.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Guidelines on Identifying and Dealing with Weak Banks
07/16/2015
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision published guidelines for identifying and dealing with weak banks. The guidelines revise and update the 2002 Basel Committee guidance for dealing with weak banks to take into account the changes in regulatory expectations and practices on early intervention, resolution frameworks, recovery and resolution planning, stress testing and macroprudential oversight. The revised guidelines are directed to supervisors and resolution authorities as well as international financial institutions advising supervisors.
View the guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on the Possible Impact of EU Capital Requirements Legislation on Bank Financing of the Economy
07/15/2015
The European Commission launched a consultation on the possible impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive on bank financing of the economy. Under the CRR, the European Commission must conduct an analysis of how the CRR may impact the ability of banks to provide lending to the wider economy. The consultation aims for a better understanding of the impact of the CRR requirements on the availability of financing, particularly for infrastructure and other investments that support long-term growth as well as corporate borrowers, including small and medium enterprises. Responses to the consultation will form part of the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU. The report will also consider the analysis being conducted by the European Banking Authority on SME lending and independent research. The consultation is open until October 7, 2015.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Releases Draft Details for EU-wide Transparency Exercise and 2016 EU-wide Stress Tests
07/15/2015
The EBA published a draft list of banks that would be participating in the EU-wide transparency exercise at the end of 2015, together with draft templates showing the type of data that will be disclosed covering composition of capital, leverage ratio, risk weighted assets by risk type, sovereign exposures, credit risk exposures and asset quality, market risk and securitization exposures as of December 2014 and June 2015. The EBA also announced certain features of the 2016 EU-wide stress test, which is expected to launch in the first quarter of 2016. The assessment and quality checks of the 2016 stress tests are expected to be concluded by the third quarter of 2016 which is when the results of individual banks will also be published.
View the EBA’s announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Commission Consults on the Possible Impact of EU Capital Requirements Legislation on Bank Financing of the Economy
07/15/2015The European Commission launched a consultation on the possible impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive on bank financing of the economy. Under the CRR, the European Commission must conduct an analysis of how the CRR may impact the ability of banks to provide lending to the wider economy. The consultation aims for a better understanding of the impact of the CRR requirements on the availability of financing, particularly for infrastructure and other investments that support long-term growth as well as corporate borrowers, including small and medium enterprises. Responses to the consultation will form part of the Commission’s report to the European Parliament and the Council of the EU. The report will also consider the analysis being conducted by the European Banking Authority on SME lending and independent research. The consultation is open until October 7, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Consults on Implementation of UK Leverage Ratio Framework
07/10/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published proposed rules on the implementation of the UK leverage ratio framework. The Financial Policy Committee directed the PRA on July 1, 2015, to implement a UK leverage ratio framework applying: (i) a minimum leverage requirement immediately to UK Global Systemically Important Institutions, and from 2018 (subject to a review in 2017) to all banks, building societies and PRA-regulated investment firms; (ii) a supplementary leverage ratio buffer of 35 percent. of corresponding risk weighted systemic buffer rates to UK G SIIs, phased in from 2016, and to domestically systemically important banks, building societies and PRA regulated investment firms from 2019, referred to as the additional leverage ratio buffer or ALRB; and (iii) a countercyclical leverage ratio buffer of 35 percent. of a firm’s institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer rate which will apply immediately to UK G SIIs and other major domestic UK banks and building societies and from 2018 (subject to a review in 2017) to all banks, building societies and PRA regulated investment firms, including any ring fenced banks, large building societies and any other banks that become subject to a countercyclical capital buffer. The PRA’s consultation sets out how it intends to implement that framework and includes proposed rules, templates for reporting, a supervisory statement on which firms would be expected to report leverage ratio information and a supervisory statement on the PRA’s expectations on the application of the UK leverage ratio framework. Responses to the consultation must be submitted by October 12, 2015.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards for Capital Requirements for Mortgage Exposures
07/06/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on draft Regulatory Technical Standards relating to the conditions that national regulators must consider when tightening capital requirements for mortgage exposures and determining higher risk‑weights and higher minimum Loss Given Default values under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft RTS set out the conditions and financial stability considerations that would promote harmonization in setting higher risk weights and higher minimum LGD values. The proposed conditions set out in the consultation paper include a requirement for national regulators to specify the LGD expectation on property segments in property markets. The consultation states that forward‑looking analyses should be made and consideration given to developments in the property markets. The consultation also seeks views on the levels of indicative benchmarks for loss expectations when higher risk weights are set. Responses to the consultation are due by October 6, 2015.
View the consultation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Supervisory Authorities Consult on Draft Guidelines for the Prudential Assessment of Acquisitions and Qualifying Holdings
07/03/2015
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (consisting of the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) published new proposals and draft guidelines for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in the financial sector. The new guidelines will replace previous guidelines published by the ESAs’ predecessors. The draft guidelines aim to provide legal certainty and clarity on assessment processes relating to increases of control and acquisitions in banks, investment firms and insurance firms, bringing a more harmonized, clear and transparent process in prudential assessments by national regulators, as well as clearer details on what information is required from proposed acquirers. The guidelines cover questions related to: (i) indirect acquisitions of qualifying holdings; (ii) assessment periods; and (iii) financial soundness of acquirers. Responses to the consultation are due by October 2, 2015.
View the consultation and draft guidelines.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opinion and Amended Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Derogations for Currencies with Constraints on Availability of Liquid Assets
07/03/2015
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the European Commission’s intention to amend draft Regulatory Technical Standards on derogations for currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR allows firms to apply derogations where a justified need for liquid assets exists owing to the Liquidity Coverage Requirement, and exceeds the availability of those liquid assets in certain currencies. Measures in the draft RTS were introduced to prevent the unnecessary use of derogations by firms, such as a general 8% haircut to be applied to foreign currency liquid assets, and a requirement that the value of the collateral posted at a central bank is subject to a haircut of at least 15%. The EBA states in its Opinion that it agrees with the Commission’s suggestion to remove from the RTS the requirement for a haircut of at least 15%. The EBA also agrees with other amendments suggested by the Commission, such as providing more detail on what is considered to be an exceptional circumstance, conditions for derogations, and the process for notification of exceptional circumstances. The EBA has amended and resubmitted the draft RTS, and these are included in the Opinion.
View the Opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Semi‑Annual Report on Risks in the European Banking Sector
07/03/2015
The European Banking Authority published its seventh semi‑annual report on risks in the European banking sector. The report is based on 2014 data. The report does not cover the current situation in Greece. However, an addendum to the report notes that based on the most recent supervisory data, the exposure towards Greek borrowers by non‑Greek banks in Europe appears to be less than €20 billion or 1.4% of Common Equity Tier 1. The report sets out the main developments and trends that have affected the EU banking sector since mid‑2014 until June 12, 2015 as well as the EBA’s view of the key micro‑prudential risks in the near future.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Report on Impact and Accountability of Banking Supervision
07/02/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a report on the impact and accountability of banking supervision. The report analyzes how global supervisors define and evaluate the impact of their policies and actions and discusses: (i) supervisory trends and their development over time since the financial crisis; (ii) the objectives of supervision and how these are transformed into supervisory actions; (iii) developments in how to measure the impact of supervision through quality assurance mechanisms and feedback loops within the supervisory process; and (iv) internal and external accountability arrangements in the wake of the financial crisis.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consults on Review of the Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
07/01/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced a review of the Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework. The objectives of the review include ensuring that all important drivers of CVA risk and CVA hedges are covered in the Basel regulatory capital standard. Further, the review will align the capital standard with the fair value measurement of CVA employed under a number of accounting regimes and ensure consistency with the proposed revisions to the market risk framework under the Basel Committee’s Fundamental Review of the Trading Book.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Financial Policy Committee Publishes Policy Statement on New UK Leverage Ratio Framework
07/01/2015
The Bank of England published a Policy Statement on the Financial Policy Committee’s powers over leverage ratio tools. The BoE was given powers of direction over leverage ratio requirements and buffers for banks, building societies and Prudental Regulation Authority‑regulated investment firms in April this year. The FPC intends to direct the PRA to apply: (i) a minimum leverage requirement immediately to UK Global Systemically Important Banks and other major domestic UK banks and building societies, and from 2018 (subject to a review in 2017) to all banks, building societies and PRA‑regulated investment firms; (ii) a supplementary leverage ratio buffer of 35% of corresponding risk‑weighted systemic buffer rates to UK G‑SIBs, phased in from 2016, and to domestically systemically important banks, building societies and PRA‑regulated investment firms from 2019; and (iii) a countercyclical leverage ratio buffer of 35% of a firm’s institution‑specific countercyclical capital buffer rate which will apply immediately to UK G‑SIBs and other major domestic UK banks and building societies and from 2018 (subject to a review in 2017) to all banks, building societies and PRA‑regulated investment firms, including any ring‑fenced banks, large building societies and any other banks that become subject to a systemic risk‑weighted capital buffer. The FPC cannot direct the means by which or the time within which the PRA must implement a direction but the PRA is now expected to take the proposals forwards. The implementation of the UK leverage ratio framework for G‑SIBs and other major domestic UK banks and building societies is ahead of the internationally agreed standards which are expected to introduce a minimum leverage ratio requirement by January 1, 2018. A consultation paper on implementation of the FPC’s direction is due to be published on July 10, 2015.
View the Policy Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Bank of England Publishes Financial Stability Report Identifying Main Current Risks in UK Financial System
07/01/2015
The Bank of England published its Financial Stability Report which identifies the main current risks in the UK financial system. The report sets out recommendations made by the Financial Policy Committee on Additional Tier 1 capital for the purposes of the minimum leverage ratio requirement. The report recommends to the Prudential Regulation Authority that AT1 capital should be counted towards Tier 1 capital only if the relevant capital instrument specifies a trigger event that occurs when the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of the institution falls below 7%. The report also directs the BoE, PRA and Financial Conduct Authority to work with firms to complete cyber‑attack resilience assessments (also known as CBEST tests), adopt cyber‑resilience action plans and establish arrangements for CBEST tests to become regular cyber resilience assessments within the UK financial system. The report also refers to recommendations on the new UK leverage ratio framework which are discussed in further detail below.
View the report. -
US Federal Reserve Board Implements Changes to the Name Check Process for Domestic and International Banking Applications
07/01/2015On June 25, 2015, the Federal Reserve Board issued a supervisory letter implementing changes to the "name check" process for banking applications. Under the previous process, a name check was conducted on all proposed officers and/or new principle shareholders of a supervised financial institution involved in an application under consideration by the Federal Reserve Board. The new name check process will only be conducted for individuals that will become principal shareholders or one of the top two policymakers of the organization upon consummation of the process. In the case of a group acting in concert, name checks generally will be initiated on all individual group members with five percent or greater individual ownership interests. A completed name check will remain current for five years; individuals and companies with current name checks will generally not be rechecked unless circumstances indicate otherwise. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board will obtain credit bureau reports in certain limited situations to supplement and corroborate financial information provided in the application process. The guidance is applicable to all financial institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve Board, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets.
View the Federal Reserve Board supervisory letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Monetary Authority of Singapore Releases Consultation Paper on Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions in Singapore
06/23/2015
The Monetary Authority of Singapore released its Consultation Paper on Proposed Enhancements to Resolution Regime for Financial Institutions in Singapore. In the paper, MAS proposed enhancements to the resolution regime in Singapore by strengthening its powers to resolve distressed institutions while maintaining continuity of their critical economic functions. Among other topics, the policy proposals cover: (i) recovery and resolution planning; (ii) temporary stays and suspensions; (iii) statutory bail-in powers; (iv) cross-border recognition of resolution actions; (v) creditor safeguards; and (vi) resolution funding. The proposed policy changes will be introduced primarily through amendments to the MAS Act, supported by the necessary regulations. MAS will also consult on the legislative amendments, after considering the feedback received on the policy proposals in this consultation. The submission deadline for comments on the proposal is July 22, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting for Liquidity Coverage Ratio
06/23/2015
The European Banking Authority published its final draft Implementing Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation, amending the existing ITS on supervisory reporting on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. The final draft ITS make significant changes to the existing LCR reporting templates and a large number of new data items need to be introduced further to the requirements of the LCR delegated regulation published in the Official Journal of the European Union in January 2015. The changes include new templates and instructions for banks on capturing and reporting all necessary LCR items. The new templates cover liquid assets, outflows, inflows, collateral swaps and calculation of the LCR. The new instructions will only apply to banks – investment firms will continue to use current instructions and templates, at least for now.
View the ITS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Releases Final Net Stable Funding Ratio Disclosure Standards
06/22/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released final Net Stable Funding Ratio disclosure standards. The NSFR was introduced by the Basel Committee to reduce funding risk over a period of one year by requiring banks to fund their activities with sufficiently stable sources to mitigate the risk of future funding stress. The NSFR and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio are intended to increase a bank's resilience to liquidity shocks, ensure more stable funding and enhance liquidity risk management. Similar to the LCR disclosure framework, the goal of the NSFR disclosure standards is to improve transparency of funding requirements and reduce uncertainty in the markets as the NSFR is implemented. The NSFR disclosure requirements are applicable to internationally active banks on a consolidated basis although jurisdictions may choose to apply the requirements to other banks. Banks will be required to publish their NSFR disclosures at the same time as they publish their financial statements, either within those statements or linked to their websites. Banks will also need to make archived disclosures publicly available on their websites for a retention period to be determined by national regulators. The NSFR disclosure requirements will be adopted in parallel to the NSFR and banks will be required to comply with the new disclosure requirements from the date of the first reporting period after January 1, 2018.
View the press release.
View the final standards.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards on Extensions and Changes to Internal Approaches Consolidated
06/19/2015
An Amending Regulation which amends the Regulatory Technical Standards on assessing the materiality of extensions and changes of internal approaches when calculating own funds requirements for market risk was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Amending Regulation adds standards to the original RTS on the conditions for assessing materiality of extensions and changes to Internal Model approaches used for the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk. The amendments mean that all of the provisions regulating extensions and changes to internal approaches are set out in a single legal text. The original RTS only included provisions for the Internal Rating Based Approach and the Advanced Measurement Approaches used for calculating capital requirements for credit and operational risk. The Amending Regulation enters into force on July 9, 2015.
View the Amending Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Approves Final Rule Amending Regulation D
06/18/2015
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted a final rule amending Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions), changing the calculation of interest payments on certain balances maintained by eligible institutions at Federal Reserve Banks. In contrast to the previous rule, which based interest payments on the average rate over the two-week reserve maintenance period, the final rule bases interest payments on a daily rate. The amendment is intended to enhance the effectiveness of changes in such rates of interest in moving the Federal funds rate into the target range established by the Federal Open Market Committee, especially when changes in those rates do not coincide with the beginning of a maintenance period. The amendments to Regulation D will be effective July 23, 2015.
View text of amended Regulation D.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
EU Technical Standards on Own Funds Requirements Amended
06/17/2015
A regulation which amends the regulatory technical standards for own funds requirements was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amending regulation aims to ensure a harmonized approach across the EU to the deduction from own funds items of indirect and synthetic holdings in firms' own funds instruments and indirect and synthetic holdings in financial sector entities. The amending regulation adds provisions to the original RTS which: (i) explain what intermediate entities mean for the purpose of deducting holdings in financial sector entities held indirectly through intermediate entities; (ii) expand upon the different investments which should be considered as synthetic holdings and the amount to be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 items in each case; (iii) set out the calculation for firms to determine the percentage held indirectly in a financial sector entity; (iv) include criteria required for indices to be qualify as broad market indices; and (v) explain the calculation of minority interests. The amending regulation enters into force on July 7, 2015.
View the amending regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Revise How Small Banks are Assessed for Deposit Insurance
06/16/2015
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and request for comment on proposed refinements to the deposit insurance assessment system for small insured depository institutions that have been federally insured for at least five years (referred to as “established small banks”). The FDIC is proposing to refine the deposit insurance assessment system by: (i) revising the financial ratios method so that it would be based on a statistical model estimating the probability of failure over three years; (ii) updating the financial measures used in the financial ratios method consistent with the statistical model; and (iii) eliminating risk categories for established small banks and using the financial ratios method to determine assessment rates for all such banks (subject to minimum or maximum initial assessment rates based upon a bank’s composite rating). The FDIC proposes that the refinements would become operative the quarter after the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund reaches 1.15 percent. and that a final rule would go into effect the quarter after a final rule is adopted; however, as stated above, the proposed amendments would not become operative until the quarter after the DIF reserve ratio reaches 1.15 percent.
View the FDIC press release.
View the Noticed of Proposed Rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Proposes Rule to Revise Deposit Insurance Assessments for Small Banks
06/16/2015
The FDIC proposed an amendment to the methods used by the FDIC in assessing small banks for deposit insurance. Under the proposal, only banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured by the FDIC for at least five years would be affected. Specifically, the FDIC will (i) revise the financial ratios method to be based on a statistical model estimating the probability of failure over three years; (ii) update the financial measures used in the financial ratios method to be consistent with the statistical model; and (iii) eliminate risk categories for established small banks and use the financial ratios method to determine assessment rates for all such banks. As the proposal seeks to be revenue neutral, the aggregate assessment revenue collected from small banks affected by the revisions is expected to remain approximately the same as it would have been otherwise. To assist banks in understanding the potential effect of the proposed rule and in estimating assessment rates under the proposal, the FDIC has published an online assessment calculator. Comments on the proposal are due within 60 days from publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.
View the notice of proposed rulemaking.
View the proposed assessment calculator.
View statement by FDIC Chairman, Martin J. Gruenberg.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Finalize Revisions to the Capital Rules Applicable to Advanced Approaches Banking Organizations
06/16/2015
The Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued final revisions to the regulatory capital rules adopted in July 2013. The final rule is applicable to large, international banking organizations that calculate their regulatory capital ratios using the advanced approaches rule (generally, institutions with more than $250 billion in total consolidated assets or more than $10 billion in total on-balance sheet foreign exposures). The final rule substantially adopts the changes to the rule as proposed on December 18, 2014, and corrects and updates certain aspects of the advanced approaches rule, including the calculation requirements for risk-weighted assets for banking organizations using the advanced approaches method. The revisions also enhance the consistency of the advanced approaches rule with international capital standards. The final rule will be effective October 1, 2015.
View the final rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Releases Statement on Court’s Decision in Starr International Company, Inc. v. The United States
06/15/2015
The Federal Reserve Board issued a public statement regarding AIG and the recently issued United States Court of Federal Claims decision in Starr International Company, Inc. v. The United States. In its statement, the Federal Reserve Board stated that its actions during the bailout of AIG during the financial crisis were “legal, proper and effective.” In the decision, the United States Court of Federal Claims found in favor of Starr International Company, Inc. on a portion of its claim against the United States under the Fifth Amendment, but ultimately did not award any damages. The opinion strongly criticized many of the US government’s actions with respect to the assistance it provided AIG in 2008 and the years following. Ultimately, the Court held that no damages were available to the shareholders, because they were in fact in a better position than they would have been had the US government not intervened and AIG had filed for bankruptcy.
View Federal Reserve Board press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Disclosure and Supervisory Reporting of Leverage Ratio
06/15/2015
The European Banking Authority published two final draft Implementing Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation on the leverage ratio for EU firms with regards to disclosure and supervisory reporting. These include amendments and updates to templates used for supervisory reporting and instructions to update the leverage ratio disclosure and reporting framework. The final draft ITS on reporting aim to encourage the harmonization of reporting and disclosure of the leverage ratio across the European Union, as consistent reporting requirements in all member states facilitate the comparability of data as well as cross-border supervision. The final draft ITS will enter into force following their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
View final draft ITS.
View final draft ITS 2.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Agencies Publish Volcker Rule Frequently Asked Questions 14 and 15
06/12/2015
The US federal agencies responsible for implementing the Volcker Rule (the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission) issued two new Volcker Rule Frequently Asked Questions. The FAQs provide guidance regarding the application of covered funds exclusions to foreign public funds and joint ventures.
FAQ 14 generally provides that foreign public funds sponsored by banking entities will not themselves be treated as banking entities even if controlled by a foreign banking entity though means other than share ownership. FAQ 15 generally emphasizes that joint ventures must be engaged in business activities, as opposed to investing in securities or other financial instruments, in order to be exempt as a joint venture.
View FAQ 14.
View FAQ 15.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Agencies Issue Final Standards for Assessing Diversity Policies and Practices of Regulated Entities
06/09/2015
Several US federal financial regulatory agencies (including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Securities and Exchange Commission) issued a final interagency policy statement creating joint standards to assess the diversity policies and practices of entities they regulate, as required by Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act.
Similar to the proposed standards, the final standards provide regulated entities with a framework for strengthening their
diversity policies and practices. This framework includes an organizational commitment to diversity, workforce and employment practices, procurement and business practices and practices to promote transparency of organizational diversity and inclusion within the entities’ US operations.
The final interagency policy statement is effective on publication in the Federal Register.
View the press release.
View the interagency policy statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Launches Consultation on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
06/08/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation paper on the risk management, capital treatment and supervision of interest rate risk in the banking book. The proposals expand upon, and are intended to ultimately replace, the Basel Committee’s 2004 Principles for the Management and Supervision of Interest Rate Risk. The objectives of the proposals are to help ensure that banks have appropriate capital to cover potential losses from exposures to changes in interest rates and to limit capital arbitrage between the trading book and the banking book, as well as between banking book portfolios that are subject to different accounting treatments. The published proposal
presents two options for the capital treatment of interest rate risk in the banking book: (i) a Pillar 1 (Minimum Capital Requirements) approach; and (ii) an enhanced Pillar 2 approach. Comments to the proposal are due by September 11, 2015.
View the consultation document.
View the 2004 Principles for the Management and Supervision of Interest Rate Risk.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Releases Guidance Regarding Calculations of Stage 1 Threshold
06/08/2015
US Financial Stability Oversight Council staff released guidance providing additional information regarding the calculation of Stage 1 thresholds, used by the FSOC to help identify nonbank financial companies for potential supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and to determine application of enhanced prudential standards to such companies. To assist its determination, the FSOC created a three-stage process, where it applies in Stage 1 six quantitative thresholds to a broad group of nonbank financial companies to assess whether any may be subject to further evaluation in Stage 2. The recent FSOC guidance describes the components of each of the thresholds, applicable accounting standards that are applied, data sources that are utilized, entities included in the calculations, the frequency of calculations and periodic review of the Stage 1 thresholds.
View the FSOC staff guidance.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Final Rules on Approach to Regulating Liquidity
06/08/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement setting out the final rules on its approach to regulating liquidity under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Policy Statement provides feedback on the responses received by the PRA to the consultation on liquidity published in November 2014, and refers to a new Supervisory Statement on supervisory liquidity and funding risks which was published on the same day. The Policy Statement is aimed at UK banks, EEA banks with a branch in the UK, PRA-designated investment firms, as well as third country banks or PRA-designated investment firms. The Policy Statement includes new rules and feedback on issues related to: (i) the phasing-in of the Liquidity Coverage Requirement and additional liquidity requirements on top of the LCR; (ii) liquidity reporting and disclosure, including changes made to address concerns about the increased and burdensome volume of liquidity data that is to be reported; and (iii) interim LCR reporting. The Supervisory Statement deals with issues including (i) the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process; (ii) the liquidity supervisory review and evaluation process; (iii) the drawing down of liquid asset buffers; (iv) collateral placed at the Bank of England; and (v) reporting of liquidity positions. The rules and Supervisory Statement come into effect on October 1, 2015, with the exception of Annex E, which will delete the requirement to submit certain liquidity returns and which will enter into force following a further review.
View the policy statement.
View the supervisory statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Advanced Measurement Approaches for Calculating Capital Requirements for Operational Risk
06/05/2015
The European Banking Authority published a final report, dated June 3, 2015, including final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the criteria that national regulators must take into account before allowing firms to use the Advanced Measurement Approaches for calculating capital requirements for operational risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft RTS aim to encourage regulatory harmonization across the European Union and also detail the assessment methodology that is to be used by national regulators. The draft RTS cover: (i) the qualitative and quantitative criteria that firms must meet before they are granted permission to use AMA models; (ii) the criteria for the supervisory assessment of key methodological components of the operational risk measurement system; and (iii) the common standards for the supervisory assessment of a bank’s operational risk governance.
View the final draft RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Extension of Transitional Provisions for Exposures to CCPs Formally Announced
06/04/2015
Following the announcement by the European Commission, that the transitional period for regulatory capital requirements for EU banks’ exposures to CCPs under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation would be extended from June 15, 2015 to December 15, 2015, the Implementing Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on June 9, 2015. The Implementing Regulation comes into effect on June 12, 2015. The extension is intended to allow further time for CCPs, both from the EU and from non-EU jurisdictions, to become authorized or recognized under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. One of the requirements for recognition of a third country CCP is that the third country’s regime for supervision of CCPs is deemed to be equivalent to that of the regime under EMIR. Equivalence decisions for CCP regimes have only been given for Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and Japan. Decisions for major jurisdictions, such as the US, are still outstanding. Authorization or recognition under EMIR will give the CCP the status of being a Qualifying CCP, which is relevant for clearing member firms to calculate their capital requirements for exposures to CCPs under the CRR. Lower capital requirements will be imposed for exposures to a QCCP than for exposures to a non-QCCP CCP.
View the Implementing Regulation.
View our client note on third country equivalence under EMIR. -
Federal Banking Agencies Release Statement on Annual Stress Tests at Medium-Sized Financial Companies
06/02/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively, the Federal banking agencies), released a statement reiterating the disclosure requirements for the annual company-run stress tests conducted by financial institutions with total consolidated assets between $10 billion and $50 billion. In the statement, the Federal banking agencies emphasized the requirement for such medium-sized firms to disclose certain information regarding the annual stress tests, including: (i) a description of the types of risks included in the stress test; (ii) a summary description of the methodologies used to conduct the stress test; (iii) estimates of losses, revenue, and net income; (iv) post-stress capital ratios; and (v) an explanation of the most significant causes for the changes in regulatory capital ratios. In addition, as the Federal banking agencies have previously stated, the company-run stress tests are intended to produce hypothetical results and are not intended to be forecasts or expected outcomes.
Stress test results must be disclosed between June 15, 2015 and June 30, 2015. Any questions regarding the disclosures made in connection with the stress tests should be directed to the firms.
View statement released by the Federal banking agencies.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Amending Regulation on Own Funds Requirements in Force
06/02/2015
The Amending Regulation setting out Regulatory Technical Standards on own funds requirements for institutions under the EU Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Amending Regulation applies to banks and investment firms and specifies the conditions in which a drag on own funds is disproportionate in terms of distributions on: (i) an individual Common Equity Tier 1 instrument; and (ii) the total own funds of the firm. The Amending Regulation also deals with preferential distributions regarding preferential rights to payments of distributions as well as preferential distributions regarding the order of distribution payments. The Amending Regulation enters into effect on June 22, 2015.
View the Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Questionnaire on Regulatory Equivalence of Third Countries
06/02/2015
The European Banking Authority published a questionnaire on the assessment of third country equivalence with the regulatory and supervisory framework under the Capital Requirements Directive IV package. The questionnaire aims to assess whether third countries apply regulatory and supervisory provisions equivalent to those in the EU framework. The questionnaire will be sent to certain third countries so that the regimes of those countries can be assessed. For third countries that are deemed to be equivalent, more favorable treatment in terms of capital requirements could be available for EU credit institutions with relevant exposures to entities located in these countries, though only after the European Commission adopts an Implementing Decision determining the equivalence of the third country’s prudential supervisory and regulatory requirements.
View the questionnaire.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Bank Regulatory Agencies Seek Further Comment on Interagency Effort to Reduce Regulatory Burden
05/29/2015
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Board (collectively, the "federal bank regulatory agencies") approved a notice requesting comment on a third set of regulatory categories as part of their review to identify outdated or unnecessary regulations applied to insured depository institutions. The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 requires federal bank regulatory agencies to review their regulations at least once every 10 years and to categorize and publish the regulations for comment. Consistent with the EGRPRA, the federal bank regulatory agencies have grouped regulations applicable to insured depository institutions into 12 regulatory categories: (i) Applications and Reporting; (ii) Banking Operations; (iii) Capital; (iv) Community Reinvestment Act; (v) Consumer Protection; (vi) Directors, Officers and Employees; (vii) International Operations; (viii) Money Laundering; (ix) Powers and Activities; (x) Rules of Procedure; (xi) Safety and Soundness; and (xii) Securities. The latest notice seeks comment on regulations in the following three categories: (i) Consumer Protection; (ii) Directors, Officers and Employees; and (iii) Money Laundering. Comments will be accepted within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register. Although the current notice seeks comment on the three specifically enumerated categories above, comments are accepted on any of the established categories of regulation as well as on all rules that have been finalized before the publication of the last EGRPRA notice which is expected by year-end. The European Commission also recently launched its Better Regulation Agenda, which among other things, aims to improve the review of existing EU laws.
View the Federal Register Notice.
View the EGRPRA website.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report on Additional Tier 1 Capital Instruments
05/29/2015
The European Banking Authority published a final report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 capital instruments issued by EU firms. Under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation, the EBA must monitor the quality of own funds instruments issued by EU institutions. The report presents the EBA’s recent monitoring results and updates the EBA’s earlier report on the topic, published on May 4, 2015. The EBA has examined 15 AT1 issuances made between August 2013 and November 2014, five of which were made under a conversion mechanism and 10 under a temporary write-down mechanism, for a total amount of €21.4 billion. The report states that certain provisions or wording of existing AT1 instruments should be avoided or revised to minimize uncertainty. Wording used should be consistent with that in the CRR, for example, "non-objection" cannot be used as a substitute for "supervisory permission," a term used in the CRR. Also, certain issuances include partial regulatory calls. This means that only a portion of the instruments may be called by an institution if the corresponding part of the issuance is, due to a regulatory change, no longer recognized in Tier 1 capital. The report states that only regulatory calls for the full amount of instruments are acceptable, irrespective of whether a regulatory changes triggers full or partial derecognition from AT1 capital. The EBA intends to continue monitoring certain AT1 issuances, expects that future issuances will use some level of standardization and advises that terms and conditions should not be unjustifiably complex. The EBA will also develop standardized terms and conditions for AT1 issuances which would not be compulsory for firms but would help to ensure compliance with regulatory provisions.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Releases Annual Report
05/26/2015
The US Financial Stability Oversight Council unanimously approved and published its 2015 annual report. The report discusses a variety of issues, including significant financial market and regulatory developments, potential emerging threats to the financial stability of the US, and recommendations on methods to mitigate such threats. The findings in the FSOC report emphasize, among other things, the need for the continuing enhancement of cyber security for all market participants, the ongoing investigation into whether existing rules and standards are sufficiently robust to mitigate the potential risk that central counterparties could transmit credit and liquidity problems among financial institutions and markets during periods of market stress, and the efforts made to reduce gaps that remain in the scope and quality of data sharing among regulators.
View the 2015 FSOC annual report.
View press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Guidelines on the Management of Interest Rate Risk Arising from Non-Trading Activities
05/22/2015
The European Banking Authority published a final report on guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities also known as interest rate risk in the banking book or IRRBB. The report includes the final guidelines which apply from January 1, 2016, and are addressed to national regulators, relevant credit institutions and investment firms. The final guidelines update and repeal the guidelines published on October 3, 2006 by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors. The guidelines set out the expectations for the identification and mitigation of IRRBB risks by firms. The level of application of the guidelines should be consistent with the level of application of the supervisory review and evaluation process.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Proposes Rule to Treat US Municipal Securities as Level 2B High-Quality Liquid Assets under the Liquidity Coverage Ratio
05/21/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a proposal adding certain general obligation state and municipal bonds to the range of assets a banking organization may use to satisfy the Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement. Under the LCR requirement adopted by the federal banking agencies in September 2014, large banking organizations are required to hold High-Quality Liquid Assets that can be easily and quickly converted into cash within 30 days during a period of financial stress. The proposed rule would allow investment grade, general obligation US state and municipal bonds to be counted as HQLA up to certain levels if they meet the same liquidity criteria that currently apply to corporate debt securities. The limits on the amount of a state or municipality’s bonds that could qualify are based on the specific liquidity characteristics of the bonds. The proposed rule would apply only to entities subject to the LCR and supervised by the Federal Reserve Board. The deadline for comments on the proposed rule is July 24, 2015.
View the proposed rule.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Assignation of Risk Weights to Specialized Lending Exposures
05/11/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper comprising draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the assignation of risk weights to specialized lending exposures under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Specialized lending exposures are exposures to entities created explicitly to finance or operate physical assets. The CRR allows for special treatment of these exposures within the internal model based approach using a set of supervisory risk weights made up of five categories. The proposed RTS aim to determine how banks take into account certain factors, such as financial strength, political and legal environment and transaction characteristics, when assigning risk weight to specialized lending exposures. The draft RTS also specify how banks should combine those factors to determine the final assignment to a certain category. Responses to the consultation are due by August 11, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes New Taxonomy for Supervisory Reporting
05/08/2015
The EBA published the new taxonomy for national regulators to provide data to the EBA under the supervisory reporting requirements set out in the Capital Requirements Directive. The revised taxonomy is for reporting on funding plans and supervisory benchmarking from December 31, 2014 onwards. The revised taxonomy incorporates corrections to funding plans and benchmarking reporting structures.
View the EBA announcement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Mapping of Credit Assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions for Securitization Positions
05/07/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper comprising draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft ITS aim to determine the mapping between credit ratings and credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights to ECAIs’ ratings issued on securitizations. Under the CRR, risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approach for securitization positions should be based on the credit quality of those positions established according to the credit ratings of ECAIs. The ITS aim to enhance regulatory harmonization across the EU allowing credit ratings of all registered credit rating agencies to be used for calculating institutions’ capital requirements. Responses to the consultation are due by August 7, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Monitors Additional Tier 1 Capital Instruments
05/04/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 capital instruments issued by EU institutions. Under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation, the EBA must monitor the quality of own funds instruments issued by EU institutions. The report presents the EBA’s recent monitoring results and updates the EBA’s earlier report on the topic, published in October 2014. The EBA has examined fifteen AT1 issuances made between August 2013 and November 2014, five of which were made under a conversion mechanism and ten under a temporary write-down mechanism. The report states that certain provisions or wording of existing AT1 instruments should be avoided or revised so that uncertainty and complexity is minimized. Wording used should be consistent with that in the CRR, for example, "non-objection" cannot be used as a substitute for "supervisory permission," a term used in the CRR. The EBA intends to continue monitoring certain AT1 issuances, expects that future issuances will use some level of standardization, and advises that terms and conditions should not be unjustifiably complex. The EBA will also develop standardized terms and conditions for AT1 issuances. These would be non-compulsory for institutions, but would help to ensure compliance with regulatory provisions. The EBA report is not fully comprehensive and a final report will be published at the end of May 2015.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Final Rule on Biannual Branch Return Form for Third Country Bank Branches
04/30/2015
The UK Prudential Regulation Authority published a policy statement introducing the final rule that implements the Branch Return, a new return that will collect data biannually from EEA and non-EEA firms with UK branches. The final rule is also directed at firms looking to operate in the UK in the future. The new return gathers quantitative information on economic functions performed by branches in the UK and aims to enhance the PRA’s understanding of the impact that branches have on UK financial stability.
View the Policy Statement and Branch Return Form.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Banking Agencies Issue Guidance on Regulation Z and Regulation X
04/30/2015
The US Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Task Force on Consumer Compliance issued interagency examination procedures for Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) and Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act). The procedures reflect recent amendments by the CFPB to Regulation Z and Regulation X that, among other things, revised and integrated the disclosures received in connection with certain closed-end mortgage loans. The guidance will become effective on August 1, 2015.
View the Federal Reserve Board’s press release.
View a summary of the updates to the examination procedures.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Releases Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity
04/30/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released its Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity. The report delivers aggregate information on applications submitted by bank holding companies, state member banks, savings and loan holding companies, foreign banking organizations, and other entities and individuals for approval to undertake various transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, and engaging in new activities. The latest report covers the period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. During that period, 681 proposals were reviewed, of which 629 were approved and 52 were withdrawn. Among other things, the report noted that merger and acquisition proposals are generally more complex than other proposals. The average and median number of days to approve such an application is 60 and 41 days, respectively, but the average number of days to approve an application that receives adverse public comments is 206 days.
View the latest Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Identification Methodology for Global Systemically Important Institutions
04/29/2015
The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper to update its data template for the identification methodology for Global Systemically Important Institutions under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. This review follows on from the introduction by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision of new identification methodology in January 2015. The consultation paper includes a draft regulation amending the regulatory technical standards on the identification methodology for G-SIIs and the implementing technical standards on uniform format and date of disclosure by G-SIIs. The new data template comprises minor technical revisions such as: (i) average exchange rates being provided by the relevant supervisory authority rather than the respondent bank; and (ii) long-term monitoring items being re-labeled as "Ancillary Data". The scope of the disclosure requirements under CRD IV remains unchanged. Draft revised guidelines on further specification of the indicators of global systemic importance are also included in the consultation paper. Going forward, the data template will be incorporated into the guidelines and instructions specifying how the template should be completed will be published on the EBA website. Responses to the consultation are due by May 30, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Removes Selected National Discretions and Replies to Frequently Asked Question on Funding Valuation Adjustment
04/21/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision agreed to eliminate certain national discretions from the Basel II capital framework. The use of national discretions can hinder comparability across jurisdictions and increase variability in risk-weighted assets. The Basel Committee has agreed to remove national discretions from the Basel II capital framework regarding: (i) the treatment of past due loans; (ii) the definition of retail exposures; (iii) transitional arrangements for corporate, sovereign, bank and retail exposures; (iv) the rating structure standards for wholesale exposures; (v) internal and external audit; and (vi) re-ageing. The national discretion for the internal ratings-based approach treatment of equity exposures will expire in 2016. The Basel Committee intends to monitor national discretions that are still available and consider whether more of them should be removed. The Basel Committee also responded to a frequently asked question on funding valuation adjustment. The FAQ notes that a bank’s adoption of FVA should not have the effect of offsetting or reducing its “own credit” adjustment. A bank should continue to derecognize its debit valuation adjustment in full, whether or not it has adopted a funding valuation-type adjustment.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Seeks Comment on Potential New Deposit Account Records Requirements for Banks with a Large Number of Deposit Accounts
04/21/2015
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPR”), seeking input on potential new recordkeeping standards for certain FDIC-insured institutions with more than two million deposit accounts. The FDIC is required to provide depositors with access to their insured accounts as soon as possible after an institution fails. For a bank with a large number of deposit accounts, payments might be delayed if the bank’s records are unclear or incomplete, making it difficult to determine what is insured and what is not. Generally, the FDIC seeks input on whether banks with a large number of deposit accounts should be required to have a greater responsibility in the deposit insurance determination process. Specifically, the FDIC seeks comment on whether banks should be required to meet certain records standards, including the ability to calculate insured and uninsured amounts for each depositor at the end of each business day. The FDIC also seeks input on what types of new data requirements would aid a quick and effective insurance determination process as well as the appropriate threshold for institutions to have to comply with the potential new requirements. The proposals will be open for comment for 90 days after the ANPR has been published in the Federal Register.
View a statement issued by FDIC Director, Jeremiah O. Norton.
View the press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Outlines Organizational Structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee
04/17/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Division of Banking, Supervision and Regulation issued information regarding the operating structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee supervisory program. SR Letter 15-7 provides information on the program’s organizational structure, including the roles and responsibilities of the committees, subgroups and dedicated supervisory teams that collectively comprise the LISCC’s governance structure. Established in 2010, the LISCC program aims to oversee and supervise the largest, most systemically important financial institutions using a centralized process and is comprised of senior Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Bank officers and financial professionals.
View the letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Annual Assessment on EU Colleges of Supervisors for Cross-Border Banking Groups
04/17/2015
The European Banking Authority published its annual assessment on the EU Colleges of Supervisors. Colleges bring together regulatory authorities that supervise a banking group and provide a framework for coordinating and performing supervisory duties within the EU banking sector. The College of Supervisors is established for EEA banks with subsidiaries or significant branches in other EEA countries and includes national regulators from the EU as well as non-EU areas when necessary. The EBA’s assessment specifies an action plan for 2015, and states that the College’s 2014 action plan was fulfilled to a reasonable extent with improvements in the efficiency of EU supervisory cooperation and the development of a better understanding of the risk profiles of cross-border banking groups. The 2015 action plan covers issues such as: (i) credit, conduct and IT risk; (ii) key tasks for supervisory colleges, including joint decisions on capital and liquidity; and (iii) how best to align the functioning of the College with the new Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards on the operational functioning of supervisory colleges.
View the assessment.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Report to Correct Taxonomy for Supervisory Reporting
04/17/2015
The European Banking Authority published a report on the eXtensible Business Reporting Language taxonomy filing rules. National regulators use this taxonomy to provide data to the EBA under the supervisory reporting requirements set out in the new European capital requirements legislation. The document corrects the scheme identifier for pre-LEIs. Supervisory reporting covers own funds, financial information, large exposures, leverage and liquidity ratios, asset encumbrance and funding plans
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Outlines Organizational Structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee
04/17/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Division of Banking, Supervision and Regulation issued information regarding the operating structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee supervisory program. SR Letter 15-7 provides information on the program’s organizational structure, including the roles and responsibilities of the committees, subgroups and dedicated supervisory teams that collectively comprise the LISCC’s governance structure. Established in 2010, the LISCC program aims to oversee and supervise the largest, most systemically important financial institutions using a centralized process and is comprised of senior Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Bank officers and financial professionals.
View the letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Final EU Regulations on Calculation of Margin Periods of Risk
04/15/2015
Regulations on the calculation of margin periods of risk of netting sets, which calculation firms must use to calculate their own funds requirements when acting as a clearing member, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulations, which supplement the Capital Requirements Regulation, provide for the calculation of exposures to clients according to whether a transaction is cleared by a qualifying CCP or not. A qualifying CCP is one which has been authorized or recognized under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation.
View the Regulations.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Requests Public Comment on Proposed Amendments to Regulation D
04/14/2015
The Federal Reserve Board requested public comment on proposed amendments to Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions). The amendments include making technical changes to the calculation of interest payments on certain balances maintained by depository institutions at Federal Reserve Banks. Comments on the proposal are requested within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register.
View the press release.
View the proposal.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Progress of Supervisory Convergence Across the EU
04/09/2015
The European Banking Authority published its first report on progress towards convergence of supervisory practice across EU Member States. Under the Capital Requirements Directive, the EBA must report annually to the EU Parliament and the Council on the degree of convergence of supervisory practices between Member States. The EBA is responsible for developing a Single Rulebook and recommendations as well as a European supervisory handbook to promote consistency across the EU. The EBA’s report focuses on the supervisory review and evaluation process and assessment of risks (known as SREP), stress testing, review of permissions to use internal approach, and supervisory measures and powers. The EBA notes that there has been significant progress since 2011 in strengthening supervisory colleges and that supervisory convergence is under way. However, further work is required, such as the development of technical standards and guidelines on key aspects of the Internal Ratings Based Approach, the interaction between capital buffers, and additional capital requirements and implementation by national regulators of the EBA’s guidelines and other policy items relating to supervision.
View the EBA’s report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Expands Applicability of Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement
04/09/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a final rule expanding the applicability of its Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (“Policy Statement”) to include certain savings and loan holding companies and raising the asset threshold of the Policy Statement from $500 million to $1 billion in total consolidated assets. This rulemaking will allow a greater number of community banks to qualify for the advantages of being deemed a small bank holding company.
Small bank holding companies are exempt from the requirement to maintain consolidated regulatory capital ratios; instead, regulatory capital ratios only apply at the subsidiary bank level. This rule allows small bank holding companies to use non-equity funding, such as holding company loans, to finance growth and/or to use leverage to fund share repurchases and otherwise provide liquidity to shareholders.
The final rule implements a law passed in December 2014 by Congress. It will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.View the Federal Reserve Board press release.
View the draft final rule.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Issue FAQs on the Regulatory Capital Rule
04/06/2015
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued answers to certain frequently asked questions on the regulatory capital rule. The topics addressed in the FAQs include the following: (i) the definition of capital; (ii) separate account and equity exposures to investment funds; (iii) high volatility commercial real estate exposures; (iv) other real estate and off-balance-sheet exposures; (v) qualifying central counterparty questions; (vi) credit valuation adjustment questions; and (vii) other miscellaneous questions.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Further Parts of the PRA Rulebook
04/02/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published further Rules and Supervisory Statements and Policy Statements that will form part of the PRA Rulebook. The new Rulebook parts include verification of standing data rules and internal governance rules. The new Supervisory Statements cover internal governance, exercising certain functions under the Building Societies Act 1986 and supervising building societies’ treasury and lending activities. Also published is a new Policy Statement on the PRA’s approach to insurance business transfers. The PRA is creating a stand-alone PRA Rulebook and intends to launch the new Rulebook website online in summer 2015. The current PRA Handbook sits alongside the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook, inherited from the Financial Services Authority.
View the PRA Rulebook.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Makes Recommendations on Equivalence of Confidentiality Regimes
04/01/2015
The European Banking Authority published its recommendations on the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes of third country supervisory authorities. Under the EU Capital Requirements Directive, third country supervisory authorities may participate in a college of supervisors set up for an international cross-border bank if: (i) it is considered appropriate for that authority to participate and (ii) the authority is subject to confidentiality requirements that are equivalent to those set out in the EU Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA’s recommendations only relate to the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes. The appropriateness issue is to be determined by each college of supervisors. The EBA recommends that the confidentiality regimes of the supervisory authorities in the following countries should be considered as equivalent to the CRD IV requirements: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, China, FYR Macedonia, Mexico, Montenegro, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey and the United States.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Regulation on Reporting of Supervisory Financial Information Under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Comes into Effect
03/31/2015
The Regulation of the European Central Bank on reporting of supervisory financial information was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulation sets out the requirements for significant and less significant banks to report supervisory financial information to their relevant national regulator. The Regulation applies to all banks that fall under the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as any branches of banks established outside of the SSM where the branch operates in a Eurozone Member State or another Member State that has opted into the SSM. The aim of the Regulation is to ensure that both significant and less significant firms report a common minimum set of information to national regulators, which will then be passed to the ECB. The Regulation came into effect on April 1, 2015.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Agencies Permit Wells Fargo to Begin Using Advanced Approaches Framework
03/31/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the US Office of the Comptroller announced that Wells Fargo – one of the largest global systemically important financial institutions – will be permitted to use the “advanced approaches” capital framework to calculate and publicly disclose its risk-based capital requirements as of the second quarter of 2015. The US advanced approaches framework is available for the largest US banks following a trial or “parallel run” in which the bank proves its ability to meet disclosure requirements for the capital framework under the advanced approach method for four consecutive calendar years. Currently, seven other US banks use the advanced approaches framework. Previously, Wells Fargo used the standardized approach to calculate risk-based capital.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Bank of England Announces Details of 2015 Stress Test
03/30/2015
The Bank of England published details of the 2015 stress test for the largest UK banks and building societies. The stress test, which aims to assess the resilience of banks and the banking system to severe shock, was agreed between the Financial Policy Committee and the Prudential Regulation Authority Board. It is not a variant to the EU stress test calibrated by the European Banking Authority, as was the case for the 2014 stress test. The European Banking Authority is not intending to undertake an EU-wide stress test this year. The results of the stress test will be announced in December 2015. If a firm’s capital or leverage ratios fall below the threshold in the test, it is likely that the PRA will require the firm to strengthen its capital position. The PRA may also require a firm whose ratios meet the threshold to strengthen its capital position after examining capital adequacy, recovery and resolution plans and the extent to which potentially significant risks are not quantified adequately as part of the stress. Any weakness detected in the banking system will be addressed by the FPC which has a variety of powers at its disposal, including recommendations to the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Financial Policy Committee Given Certain Macro-Prudential Powers of Direction
03/25/2015
UK legislation was enacted which gives the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee power to issue directions to the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority for certain macro-prudential measures. The FPC will be able to give a direction to (i) specify a minimum leverage ratio for UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms; (ii) require UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms for which the PRA sets a strategic risk buffer to also maintain an additional leverage ratio specified by the FPC; (iii) require globally systemically important institutions to hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy an additional leverage ratio specified by the FPC; and (iv) require UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms to hold sufficient capital to maintain a countercyclical leverage buffer. The legislation comes into force on April 6, 2015, except for the power of direction for firms required to hold a strategic risk buffer which comes into force on January 1, 2019.
View the legislation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Regulations on Methodology for Calculation of Fixed Costs by Investment Firms
03/24/2015
A Commission Delegated Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Journal, which amends the Delegated Regulation on own funds requirements for investment firms based on fixed overheads. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation certain investment firms are able to use an alternative method based on a quarter of their fixed costs to calculate their total capital requirement. The amending Regulations insert into the Delegated Regulation the methodology for investment firms to calculate fixed overheads. The amending Regulations come into force on April 14, 2015.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Supervisory Board Code of Conduct Published in Official Journal of the European Union
03/20/2015
The Code of Conduct for the Members of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The code includes the basic principles that members of the board are to abide by, as well as rules on conflicts of interest, private financial transactions and wealth declarations. This follows on from the ECB’s new prudential supervisory role for banks in the Eurozone under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB assumed this new role in November 2014, and the SSM creates a new system of financial supervision, under which the ECB directly supervises 120 significant banking groups, and sets and monitors supervisory standards for other Eurozone banks by working more closely with national regulators. The code entered into force on March 21, 2015.
View the code of conductTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Issues Consultation and Draft Guidelines on Limits on Exposures to Shadow Banking Entities
03/19/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a consultation and published draft guidelines on setting limits on exposures to shadow banking entities which carry out activities outside of the regulated framework under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The guidelines set out the approaches that institutions should take to develop internal policies for monitoring and setting limits on individual and aggregate levels. The Principal Approach and the Fallback Approach for setting limits on exposures are set out in the guidelines. The Principal Approach proposes that institutions set an aggregate limit to exposures to the shadow banking sector in relation to the institution’s eligible capital. If an institution is not able to apply the Principal Approach, due to, for example, holding insufficient information about the activities of shadow banking entities, the Fallback Approach should be used which would mean that a limit of 25% of the institution’s eligible capital would be applied to its aggregate exposures to shadow banking entities. In addition, institutions would set tighter limits to individual exposures and should take into account matters such as the financial situation and regulatory status of the shadow banking entity, and whether the entity is vulnerable to asset price or credit quality volatility. The draft guidelines also set out the proposed definitions that are to be used for terms that have not been defined or sufficiently defined in the CRR, such as “shadow banking entities”, “exposures to shadow banking entities”, “excluded undertakings” and “credit intermediation activities.” Comments on the consultation may be submitted until June 19, 2015.
View the consultation paper and guidelinesTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry Testimony
03/19/2015
The Comptroller of the Currency discussed the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s approach to adapting regulatory and supervisory expectations to the size and complexity of supervised institutions. His remarks were part of testimony before the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. His testimony provides a brief overview of the key provisions of Section 165 of Dodd-Frank Act as they apply to bank holding companies and how the OCC’s supervisory and regulatory tools complement and support the objectives of these provisions. He also describes that the OCC has tailored its supervisory programs into three distinct portfolios—community banks, midsize banks, and large banks.
View the oral statement
View the written testimonyTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory Reporting
03/18/2015
The European Banking Authority published its final draft Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting to amend the current ITS on supervisory reporting for institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulations. The draft ITS include minor amendments to several templates that are to be used by financial institutions in the supervisory reporting process as well as corrections to clerical errors and legal references. The ITS set out the standards that financial institutions must meet for the purposes of supervisory reporting.
View the final draft ITS and annexesTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Updates Periodic Risk Dashboard
03/16/2015
The European Banking Authority updated its periodic risk dashboard setting out the principal risks and vulnerabilities in the EU banking sector. The dashboard analyses the evolution of risk indicators among a sample of 55 banks across the EU. The dashboard shows that the capital position trends of EU banks are positive and that CET 1 ratios are at their highest levels since 2009. It also shows that levels of profitability tend to be unstable but that balance sheet structures are shifting towards lower loan-to-deposit ratios, and therefore less debt.
View the risk dashboardTopic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Proposal Requiring Banking Organizations to Include Legal Entity Identifiers on Reporting Documents
03/16/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced a proposal requiring banking organizations to include their existing Legal Entity Identifiers on certain regulatory reporting forms as of June 30, 2015. The LEI is a unique reference code that enables easier identification of a firm’s legal entities. Comments on the proposal are requested within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register.
View the ProposalTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Releases Results for Dodd-Frank Annual Stress Tests
03/11/2015
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System recently released results for the Dodd-Frank Annual Stress Tests for the 31 largest bank-holding companies. This is the third round of stress tests required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. According to the press release, all of the largest US-based bank holding companies have passed the test and have been building capital levels at a sufficient level to withstand severe recession and financial market volatility. The quantitative results from these tests are one part of the Federal Reserve Board’s annual exercise to evaluate the capital planning and adequacy of large financial institutions. Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review results will be released on March 11, 2015.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release
View the 2015 Supervisory Stress Test Methodology and ResultsTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Federal Reserve Board Releases Results for 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
03/11/2015
The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that it has not objected to the capital plans of 28 bank holding companies participating in the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. However, Bank of America Corporation is required to submit a new capital plan to address weaknesses in its capital planning processes. The Federal Reserve Board did object to the capital plans of Deutsche Bank Trust Corporation and Santander Holdings USA due to qualitative concerns. There were no objections based on quantitative grounds. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Morgan Stanley needed to submit adjusted capital actions to meet the minimum post-stress minimum capital requirements.
View the Federal Reserve Board press release
View the CCAR resultsTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Revised List of Validation Rules Issued by European Banking Authority for Supervisory Reporting
03/11/2015
The European Banking Authority published a revised list of validation rules for submitting supervisory reporting data. The rules detail the standards and formats that are to be used for submissions of data by national regulators under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. The revised list displays the rules that have been deactivated due to technical issues or incorrectness.
View the EBA press release and updated validation rulesTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Opinion on Eligibility Conditions for Covered Bonds and Risk Weight Preferential Treatment Further to Swedish Waiver
03/05/2015
The European Banking Authority published an opinion on the Capital Requirements Regulation provision that deals with eligibility conditions for covered bonds in relation to risk weight preferential treatment, including the assets by which eligible covered bonds can be collateralized. Under the CRR, eligible covered bonds can be collateralized by exposures to institutions that qualify for the credit quality step 1, which must not exceed 15% of the nominal amount of outstanding covered bonds of the issuing institution. Exposures to institutions in the EU with a maturity not exceeding 100 days have no CQS 1 requirement, but must at least qualify for CQS 2. After consulting the EBA, national regulators may partially waive these specifications and allow CQS 2 for up to 10% of the total exposure of the nominal amount of outstanding covered bonds of the issuing institution. This would only apply if significant potential concentration problems in the specific member state are due to the application of the CQS 1 requirement. In December 2014, the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority submitted a proposal to the EBA for such a waiver. The EBA has assessed the proposal, taking into account factors such as the nature and magnitude of exposures to institutions that covered bonds assume in that jurisdiction. The EBA is of the opinion that sufficient evidence was submitted by the Swedish Regulator to document that the significant potential concentration problem derives from the application of the CQS 1 requirement specified in the CRR. The EBA has stated therefore that the establishment of a partial waiver is justified.
View the EBA opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Launches Discussion Paper on Future of Internal Ratings-Based Approach
03/04/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a discussion paper on the future of the internal ratings-based approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation. This is the approach under which certain banks and investment firms with sophisticated risk management systems are allowed to calculate capital requirements based on internally produced parameters. The paper discusses the compromised comparability of capital requirements under the IRB approach due to the framework’s high level of flexibility. The EBA believes that a review of the regulatory framework for the IRB approach is required to ensure a higher level of comparability going forward. Comments on the discussion paper may be submitted until 5 May 2015.
View the discussion paperTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Consults on Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies
03/04/2015
The European Banking Authority launched a public consultation on its guidelines on sound remuneration policies. The guidelines specify the criteria for allocation of remuneration components into either fixed or variable remuneration, clarify the way in which the remuneration rules in Capital Requirements Directive should be interpreted by regulators and generally aim to ensure compliance with the bonus cap requirements introduced by CRD. The consultation period ends on June 4, 2015.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Press Release on 2015 EU-wide Stress Test
03/02/2015
The European Banking Authority issued a press release stating that it will not carry out an EU-wide stress test in 2015, but will instead be preparing for the next exercise in 2016. The EBA will however carry out a transparency exercise in 2015 which will provide data on the balance sheets and portfolios of EU banks.
View the EBA Press ReleaseTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Final Draft Standards on Benchmarking Portfolio Assessment
03/02/2015
The European Banking Authority published final draft regulatory technical standards on benchmarking portfolio assessment standards and assessment sharing procedures under the Capital Requirements Directive, together with final draft implementing technical standards on benchmarking portfolios, templates, definitions and IT solutions. These final drafts specify the framework for EU institutions and national regulators on annual supervisory benchmarking. The EBA simultaneously published its technical advice, for the purposes of the report. All documents have now been submitted to the European Commission for adoption.
View the report.
View the technical advice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
The US Federal Reserve Board Extends Comment Period for Global Systemically Important Banks Surcharge
02/26/2015
The Federal Reserve Board extended until April 3, 2015 the comment period for its proposed rule to implement capital surcharges for global systemically important banks. Comments were originally due by March 2, 2015. The Federal Reserve Board extended the comment period to allow relevant parties more time to analyze the proposed rule and prepare comments. The proposal would establish a methodology to identify if a firm is a G-SIB as well as establish the size of a firm’s risk-based capital surcharge. The rule is expected to strengthen the capital positions of these financial institutions and if finalized as proposed, would be higher than international standards.
View the The Federal Reserve Board press release
View the The Shearman & Sterling Publication on the G-SIB Surcharge proposed ruleTopic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Publishes Opinion and Report on Credit Valuation Adjustment
02/25/2015
The European Banking Authority published an Opinion addressed to the European Commission on Credit Valuation Adjustment. The Opinion deals with several aspects of the calculation of own funds requirements for CVA risk. Sixteen recommendations are listed in the Opinion, including: (i) clarifying by means of an amendment to the Capital Requirements Regulations that exchange-traded derivatives are included in the scope of CVA risk charge; (ii) harmonising the treatment of securities financing transactions in the EU; and (iii) clarifying the standardised method for CVA. The Opinion was published by the EBA simultaneously alongside a Report and Review on CVA and the application of CVA charges to non-financial counterparties established in a third country under the CRR. The documents have now been submitted for consideration by the European Commission.
View the Opinion
View the Report and ReviewTopic : Prudential Regulation -
Implementing Technical Standards under CRR
02/20/2015
Amendments to the Implementing Technical Standards for the supervisory reporting of financial institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The ITS set out the standards that financial institutions must meet for the purposes of supervisory reporting. The amendments include the replacement of several templates that are to be used by financial institutions in the supervisory reporting process. The purpose of the amendments is to increase clarity and provide further instructions and definitions to financial institutions for the purposes of supervisory reporting. The amended ITS entered into force on February 21, 2015.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Banking Regulators Request Comments on Reducing Regulatory Burden
02/20/2015
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced that they are seeking comment on banking operations regulations, capital regulations and the Community Reinvestment Act to identify “outdated or unnecessary regulations” that apply to insured depository institutions. Comments are due by May 14, 2015. Over the coming year, the regulators will publish requests for comments for nine additional categories of regulation.
View the Federal Reigster notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Prudential Regulation Authority Statement on Extension of Liquidity Modifications
02/18/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority issued a statement on extending the duration of whole-firm liquidity modifications, intragroup liquidity modifications and permissions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Following the European Commission's adoption of a Delegated Act on the Liquidity Coverage Requirement which will become the binding liquidity standard in the EU from October 1, 2015 (according to its provisions), a number of liquidity modifications granted by the PRA under its Prudential Sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms and the CRR expire between now and October 1, 2015. Given that the time period between these expirations and the LCR becoming binding is relatively short, the PRA will allow firms to extend modification periods. The PRA statement sets out the process that is to be followed to apply for an extension.
Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Opinion on Definition of Eligible Capital
02/17/2015
The European Banking Authority published its opinion on the appropriateness of the definition of “eligible capital” under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The term “eligible capital” has been used since January 2014, replacing the earlier “own funds” term for defining large exposures and setting large exposure limits. Under the “eligible funds” definition, the amount of Tier 2 capital recognized as eligible capital must not exceed one third of Tier 1 capital. Under the “own funds” definition, there was no limit for Tier 2 capital. The EBA opinion
states that it has not found any evidence to show that the new stricter regime would impact firms detrimentally and recommends that a review of the EU large exposures regime is carried out so that it can be further aligned with the final standard of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that was published in April 2014.
View the opinion.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Implementing Technical Standards under CRR
02/14/2015
Implementing technical standards for currencies in which there is an extremely narrow definition of central bank eligibility were published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires firms to report assets as liquid assets where they meet certain conditions, one of which is that the assets are eligible collateral for standard liquidity operations of a central bank in a Member State or a third country. The condition is waived for liquid assets held to meet liquidity outflows in a currency in which there is an extremely narrow definition of central bank eligibility. The ITS establish that the Bulgarian Lev is the only such currency to date.
View the legislation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Recommends Dividend Distribution Policies for Significant Eurozone Banks
02/13/2015
A European Central Bank Recommendation on dividend distribution policies was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The ECB Recommendation is addressed to significant supervised entities and significant supervised groups, which are subject to supervision by the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism.
View the recommendation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Regulatory Capital Tool for Securitization Exposures
02/13/2015
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced that they have developed an automated tool to aid financial institutions subject to the agencies’ regulatory capital rules in calculating risk-based capital requirements for individual securitization exposures. This tool is not a part of the regulatory capital rules or a component of regulatory reporting, and financial institutions may use the tool solely at their own discretion. Specifically, institutions that use the rules’ Simplified Supervisory Formula Approach to calculate risk-based capital requirements for securitization exposures may use the tool to calculate capital requirements for such exposures. The SSFA is a formula-based approach intended to apply relatively higher capital requirements to the more risky junior tranches of securitizations that are the first to absorb losses, and relatively lower requirements to the most senior tranches.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Reports on Implications of Regulatory Reforms for Banks’ Business Models
02/09/2015
The European Banking Authority published an overview of the potential implications of regulatory measures for banks’ business models. The report focuses on the impact of regulation for business models after the recent financial crisis, including the implementation of regulatory capital requirements, the leverage ratio, the liquidity coverage ratio, net stable funding ratio, reforms on banking structures, recovery and resolution regimes and the obligations under European Market Infrastructure Regulation for the derivatives markets.
View the EBA report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Financial Stability Oversight Council Adopts Supplemental Procedures for Nonbank Financial Company Designations
02/04/2015
The US Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) adopted certain changes relating to the process of reviewing nonbank financial companies for systemically important financial institution (“SIFI”) designation to make the process more transparent and collaborative. Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) enables the FSOC to identify a nonbank financial company for supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board”) and be subject to enhanced prudential standards. The changes belong in three categories: (i) improved communication and engagement with companies under consideration by the Council; (ii) better transparency with the public in regards to the designations process, while still protecting sensitive, nonpublic company information; and (iii) improved engagement during the FSOC’s annual reevaluations process.
View the FSOC supplemental procedures.
View the updated Frequently Asked Questions.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK HM Treasury Publishes Outcome of its Consultation on Leverage Ratio Framework
02/02/2015
HM Treasury published the outcome to its consultation on the leverage ratio framework. The Financial Policy Committee previously recommended that HM Treasury enable the FPC to give directions to the Prudential Regulation Authority to set leverage ratio requirements and buffers for PRA-regulated institutions. HM Treasury’s consultation paper sought views on how to implement the FPC’s recommendations and grant the FPC such powers of direction, and also included draft legislation. The FPC stated that the directions should include a power for the FPC to set a minimum leverage ratio requirement, a supplementary leverage ratio buffer to apply to global systemically important banks and major UK institutions, as well as a countercyclical ratio buffer. The outcome sets out the Government's position in light of the consultation responses, stating that the Government believes the FPC is well-placed to consider the level of leverage in the UK financial system which is prudent, whilst the systm continues to conribute to economic growth. The Government also intends to grant the FPC a power to set supplementary ratio buffers. As for the countercyclical ratio buffer, the Government states that the FPC is required to act proportionally when exercising this power, and that this requirement to act proportionally justifies the granting of this power to the FPC.
View the Outcome.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Government to Proceed with Giving Financial Policy Committee Powers for Leverage Ratio Framework
02/02/2015
The UK Government announced that it would be proceeding with the recommendations of the UK Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee to give the FPC powers of direction over the housing market and the leverage ratio for UK banks. The new powers will enable the FPC to direct the Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority to require regulated lenders to place limits on residential mortgage lending (owner-occupied only) and direct the PRA to set: (i) a minimum leverage ratio requirement; (ii) a supplementary leverage ratio buffer that will apply to globally systemically important banks and other major domestic UK banks and building societies, including ring-fenced banks; and (iii) a countercyclical leverage ratio buffer. Draft legislation providing for the new FPC powers has been put before the UK Parliament. On February 4, 2015, the FPC published draft policy statements detailing the specific tools, the firms subject to the requirements, timelines for implementation, how the tools might affect financial stability and economic growth, how the FPC intends to take decisions over setting the countercyclical leverage ratio buffer and the proposed calibration of the tools.
View the announcement here.
View the FPC papers.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Reserve Board Issues Interim Final Rule Raising Threshold for Regulatory Capital Requirements for Qualifying Small Bank Holding Companies
01/29/2015
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board”) issued a proposed rule expanding the applicability of the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (“Policy Statement”) and reducing reporting requirements for certain bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board further adopted an interim final rule excluding savings and loan companies with less than $500 million in consolidated assets that meet certain qualitative requirements in the Policy Statement from regulatory capital requirements.
View the Interim Final Rule.
View the Policy Statement.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Final Standard for Revised Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements
01/28/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued its final standard for revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements. The revised requirements aim to enhance the transparency of the approaches taken by banks in calculating their minimum regulatory capital requirements and allow market participants to access key information and compare banks’ disclosures of risk-weighted assets. In aiming to improve the comparability and consistency of disclosures, new templates are introduced, and five guiding principles for disclosures have been agreed. The disclosures should be: (i) clear; (ii) comprehensive; (iii) meaningful to users; (iv) consistent over time; and (v) comparable across banks. The new requirements will supersede the existing Pillar 3 requirements from the end of 2016.
View the final standards.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Central Bank Addresses Significant Banks on Practices under New Supervisory Framework
01/27/2015
A letter from the Chair of the Supervisory Board of the Single Supervisory Mechanism at the European Central Bank, addressed to the management of significant banks, discussing the practices that apply in the new supervisory setting of the SSM was published by the ECB. The ECB assumed its new prudential supervisory role for banks in the Eurozone under the SSM in November 2014. The SSM creates a new system of financial supervision, under which the ECB directly supervises 120 significant banking groups, and sets and monitors supervisory standards for other Eurozone banks by working more closely with national regulators. The letter states that written clarification has been requested by banks on the processes and practices that apply within the new supervisory framework. The Board recognizes that a broad variety of practices relating to the supervision of significant banks exist across member states, and confirms that the existing process under the SSM Regulation will apply until further notice. In the meantime, the ECB will proactively assess the merits of
various other approaches.
View the ECB letter.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority Amends Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Prudent Valuation
01/23/2015
The European Banking Authority published draft amended final Regulatory Technical Standards on prudent valuation of fair-valued positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft RTS, initially published in March 2014, specified the conditions under which prudent valuation requirements should be applied and introduced a methodology to calculate additional valuation adjustments in the form of two approaches: the simplified approach and the core approach. The revised draft RTS contain small amendments replacing all occurrences in Articles 9 and 10 of the word "volatility" to the word "variance." This affects institutions using the core approach only, and relaxes the calibration of the volatility test, giving more flexibility in the implementation of the prudent valuation framework. The EBA suggests that the calibration of the volatility test should be revised within the first two years of implementation.
View the revised RTS.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
UK Regulator Publishes Updated Version of Supervisory Statement on Third-Country Equivalence Aspects of Credit Risk Provisions
01/23/2015
The UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority published an updated version of its supervisory statement on the approach it will take under the Capital Requirements Regulation on credit risk treatments of exposures to third country counterparties, and for recognized exchanges. Initially, the supervisory statement set out the approach that was to be taken by the PRA on certain credit risk treatments under the CRR, where relevant third country equivalence determinations had not yet been made by the European Commission. It also set out the individual markets and exchanges that qualified as recognized exchanges under the CRR in the absence of a determination by the European Commission. Further to the binding decision of the European Commission that came into effect on January 1, 2015 (which published the names of third countries that apply supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the EU), the section in the supervisory statement dealing with this topic no longer applies and has therefore been deleted.
View the updated supervisory statement.
View the European Commission’s Decision.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Second Progress Report on Adoption of Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting
01/23/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its second progress report on the adoption by banks of its Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. The Principles are to be implemented by global systemically important banks by 2016, and aim to strengthen risk data aggregation and risk reporting at banks so that risk management and decision-making practices are improved. The report details the progress that G-SIBs have made and the measures that they have taken to comply with the Principles. Fourteen out of the thirty-one G-SIBs have stated that they will not be able to comply with the principles by the 2016 deadline. The report also states that national regulators are recommended to apply the Principles to domestic systemically important banks (known as D-SIBs) from three years after they have been identified as such.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Releases Community Reinvestment Act Evaluations
01/23/2015
The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a list of Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") performance evaluations that became public during the period of December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The CRA requires each federal bank regulatory agency to assess each federally insured institution's record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community, consistent with safe and sound lending. The list only includes national banks, federal savings associations and insured federal branches of foreign banks. The possible rating categories are as follows: outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve and substantial noncompliance. Of the thirty evaluations made public, two were rated outstanding and twenty-eight were rated satisfactory.
View list of evaluations.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Proposal Amending Regulations Related to “Fair Credit Reporting”
01/21/2015
The FDIC issued a proposed rule amending regulations related to “Fair Credit Reporting.” The three proposed amendments are as follows: (i) rescinding and removing the provisions of FDIC’s Part 334; (ii) rescinding and removing 12 CFR Part 391 Subpart C and amending 12 CFR Part 334 of the FDIC’s existing Rules and Regulations; and (iii) amending the definition of “creditor” in the Red Flag Identity Theft rule to implement the Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010. Overall, the revisions would streamline FDIC rules and eliminate unnecessary regulations.
View the Federal Register notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Issues Proposal Revising Provisions of Securitization Safe Harbor Rule
01/21/2015
The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) issued a proposed rule revising certain provisions of the Securitization Safe Harbor rule regarding the treatment of financial assets transferred in the process of a securitization or participation in a FDIC receivership. The rule, if finalized as proposed, would clarify the retention of economic interest in the credit risk of securitized financial assets. The amendment would be effective on the same timeline as the credit risk retention rule adopted under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act.
View the Federal Register notice.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Amendment to Regulation on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions on Asset Encumbrance, Single Data Point Model and Validation Rules
01/21/2015
The EU Implementing Regulation which amends the Regulation laying down Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting of institutions regarding asset encumbrance, single data point model and validation rules under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendments include changes on: (i) the format and frequency of reporting on asset encumbrance on an individual and consolidated basis; (ii) first reporting reference dates; and (iii) validation rules. The Implementing Regulation enters into force on February 10, 2015.
View the Implementing Regulation.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Basel Committee Work Program for 2015 and 2016
01/21/2015
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its work program for 2015 and 2016. The program is based around four themes: (i) policy development; (ii) the balance between simplicity, comparability and risk sensitivity across the regulatory framework; (iii) monitoring and assessing implementation of the Basel framework; and (iv) improving the effectiveness of supervision. The Basel Committee’s work program states its objectives, which include restoring confidence in capital ratios, continuing to revise existing methods of measuring risk-weighted assets, assessing the role of stress testing, reviewing the regulatory treatment of sovereign risk as well as assessing the interaction of reform policies overall.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Prudential Regulation Authority Consultation on Capital Adequacy under CRD IV
01/19/2015
The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on assessing Pillar 2 capital adequacy under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV. Pillar 2 aims to ensure that firms have sufficient capital to cover potential risks not sufficiently addressed in the prescriptive Pillar 1 requirements. The consultation paper sets out proposed changes to the current framework, rules and supervisory statements, focusing on: (i) new proposed methodologies for determining Pillar 2A capital (which aims to strengthen the relationship between an institution’s risk profile, risk management and risk mitigation systems); (ii) the buffer and the form it would take; (iii) governance and risk management; and (iv) disclosure. The consultation period closes on April 17, 2015. The PRA plans to publish its policy statement and final rules together with a supervisory statement in July 2015. It is expected that the new rules would apply from January 1, 2016.
View the consultation paper.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Delegated Regulations under CRD IV Published in Official Journal of the European Union
01/17/2015
The following Delegated Regulations supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union:
1. Delegated Regulation on the liquidity coverage requirement for credit institutions covering matters such as stress scenarios, the composition of the liquidity buffer and the general requirements for liquid assets. This Delegated Regulation will enter into force on February 6, 2015.
2. Delegated Regulation on the leverage ratio covering matters such as the calculation of the leverage ratio and the exposure value of derivatives. This Delegated Regulation entered into force on January 18, 2015.
View Delegated Regulation 1
View Delegated Regulation 2Topic : Prudential Regulation -
European Banking Authority’s Second Report on Impact of Liquidity Coverage Ratio
01/15/2015
The European Banking Authority published its second impact assessment report for the liquidity coverage ratio requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. The report is based on data provided by 322 European banks and concludes that the LCR is not expected to have a material detrimental impact on the business and risk profile of EU-established institutions. This is mainly because EU institutions have significantly improved their compliance with LCR requirements and the potential for making adjustments to balance sheets to meet LCR requirements.
View the report.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures Amendment Regulations Published
01/13/2015
HM Treasury published the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 ("the Amending Regulations") together with an explanatory memorandum. The Regulations amend the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014, which implemented all of the capital buffers under the Capital Requirements Directive except for the Systemic Risk Buffer and the Other Sysemically Important Institutions buffer. The Amending Regulations introduce the SRB for banks and investment firms. Capital buffers require firms to hold additional amounts of capital on top of their minimum capital requirements. Under CRD, member states are able to decide which firms should meet the SRB and must notify the European Commission, European Systemic Risk Board, European Banking Authority and national regulators of the reasons for use of the SRB. The SRB would apply to banks and building societies with deposits of more than £25 billion (i.e. it will apply to ring-fenced banks under the bank structural reform requirements), The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England will be responsible for setting the SRB and the Prudential Regulation Authority will apply the SRB on an entity-by-entity basis. The SRB is applicable from January 1, 2019.
View the Regulations.
View the explanatory memorandum.Topic : Prudential Regulation -
Qualified Financial Contracts Recordkeeping Related to Orderly Liquidation Authority
01/07/2015
The US Department of the Treasury (“US Treasury”), acting for the US Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), issued a proposed rulemaking aimed to implement the Qualified Financial Contract (“QFC”) recordkeeping requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed rules would apply to financial companies with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets, financial companies designated by the FSOC, as well as financial affiliates of these companies and would require recordkeeping of positions, counterparties, legal documentation and collateral. This information is needed to help the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver to, among other things, decide whether to transfer QFCs, evaluate the consequences of decisions to transfer, disaffirm or permit the termination of QFCs with one or more counterparties, and conclude whether any financial systematic risks are posed by the transfer, disaffirmation or termination of such QFCs in the case of a distressed situation. The deadline for comments is April 7, 2015.
View the US Treasure press release.
View the Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking.Topic : Prudential Regulation