The Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority announced the launch of their new joint initiative, the New Bank Start-up Unit, which will provide information and support to newly authorized banks and those wishing to become a new bank in the United Kingdom. This initiative will help new banks through the regulatory authorization process via the use of dedicated PRA or FCA staff members, a dedicated website, helpline and email address. Case officers will be allocated to firms during the authorization process. The PRA and FCA have also published a guide on the New Bank Start-up Unit which includes useful information for those aiming to set up a bank.
 
View the Guide.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved an application by Union di Banche Italiene, S.p.A., a foreign bank headquartered in Italy, to establish a representative office in New York under section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978. UBI is organized as a joint stock corporation under Italian law and has total assets of approximately $108 billion. As part of its evaluation under the IBA and Regulation K, the Federal Reserve Board noted its previous determinations that other banks in Italy were subject to comprehensive, consolidated supervision by the Bank of Italy alone. However, UBI became subject to direct prudential supervision by the European Central Bank pursuant to the Single Supervisory Mechanism as of November 2014. This order appears to represent the first Federal Reserve Board order under the IBA since the SSM took effect, finding that a foreign bank is subject to comprehensive, consolidated supervision by the ECB and a home country supervisor (the Bank of Italy) acting through the SSM. 

View the order. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a letter from the European Commission, dated December 17, 2015, on ESMA's advice and opinion on the passport under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive. ESMA advised the Commission in July 2015 on the extension of the EU passport under the AIFMD to managers and funds in to Guernsey, Jersey and Switzerland but advised that due to a lack of evidence for Singapore, Hong Kong and the US, it was unable to provide assessments for those jurisdictions. In the letter, the European Commission asks ESMA to provide an assessment for the US, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Isle of Man, Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Australia by June 30, 2016. In addition, the Commission requests that ESMA provide: (i) a more detailed assessment of the capacity of third country supervisory authorities and their enforcement track record; and (ii) a preliminary assessment of the expected inflow of funds by type and size into the EU from the relevant third countries. The Commission concurs that a further opinion from ESMA on the functioning of the EU passport under the AIFMD and on the operation of the National Private Placement Regime is warranted once the AIFMD has been transposed into all of the Member States. It is noted that such an opinion would be useful ahead of the review of the AIFMD planned for 2017.
 
View the Commission's letter.  

A letter addressing possible competition issues between established and challenger banks dated October 7, 2015 sent from the Chairman of the Treasury Committee, Mr. Andrew Tyrie, addressed to the Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England, Mr. Andrew Bailey, was published. The letter refers to the potential difficulties challenger banks may face in satisfying the conditions required to use the Internal Ratings-Based approach for calculating credit risk. Mr. Tyrie is concerned that newer banks may be at a competitive disadvantage to more established banks, given that the IRB approach leads to lower capital requirements compared to the Standardized Approach which newer smaller banks would be able to use more easily. The letter asks whether: (i) the new corporation tax regime for banks encourages competition between new and established banks; (ii) adaptations made by the Prudential Regulation Authority's to capital requirements for new banks will be effective in overcoming the competitive disadvantage that new banks may face; (iii) the PRA has plans to make further adjustments to capital or other requirements for new banks; (iv) the PRA is restricted, and if so, to what extent, from making further adjustments to newer banks' capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive IV or other EU legislation; and (v) there has been a reduction in requests for pre-application discussions with the PRA and Financial Conduct Authority since the new tax regime was announced in July 2015.
 
View the letter.

The European Systemic Risk Board published a report on the systemic risk implications of CCP interoperability arrangements which are governed by the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. There are currently five interoperable links in operation in the EU, including four authorized EU CCPs, a Swiss CCP and its Norwegian branch. The ESRB considers that the EU's current regulatory framework for interoperability is sound. However, the ESRB recommends that: (i) more regulatory granularity should be included in the framework to provide clarity for supervisors and regulators, to avoid regulatory arbitrage and to ensure a harmonized EU approach; (ii) the expected proposed legislation on CCP recovery and resolution should clarify the interaction of an interoperability arrangement with the default waterfall framework as well as portability and other default management measures; (iii) further analysis of the risks involved in interoperable arrangements for derivatives should be carried out; and (iv) the ESRB should be given a consultative role on the future development of any guidelines and rules on interoperability. The European Securities and Markets Authority recommended in February 2015 that the interoperability provisions in EMIR, which are limited to transferable securities and money-market instruments, should not be extended to OTC derivatives but could be extended to Exchange-Traded Derivatives. The European Commission must take the ESRB and ESMA reports into account when it prepares its report to the European Parliament and Council on the issue.
 
View the ESRB report.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission reopened the comment period for proposed amendments to rule 13n-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1945. The Dodd-Frank Act added sections 13(n)(5)(G) and (H) to the Exchange Act, requiring security-based swap data repositories to make data available to certain regulators and other entities, subject to certain conditions. The SEC proposed rules to implement those data access conditions on September 14, 2015. As part of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 (Public Law 114 94) signed into law on December 4, 2015, certain of those conditions were revised, including, most notably, eliminating a requirement that the recipient of such data agree to indemnify the swap data repository and SEC for expenses arising from litigation relating to the information provided. The law also clarified that the data access was limited to security-based swap data, and not all data maintained by the repository, and added “other foreign authorities” to the list of entities that the SEC may determine it is appropriate to provide access to. Comments may be submitted for 30 days, following the publication of the proposed amendments in the Federal Register.

View the proposed amendments. 

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight extended no action relief originally provided in CFTC Letter 13‑41, which was issued on June 28, 2013. CFTC Letter 13-41 permits Part 45 and Part 46 reporting counterparties to mask legal entity identifiers, and certain other enumerated identifiers and identifying terms, and permits Part 20 reporting entities to mask identifying information, in required reports in light of privacy, secrecy and blocking laws in certain jurisdictions. The CFTC previously extended this relief through CFTC Letter 15-01, and is now further extending relief, subject to certain conditions, until the earlier of March 1, 2017 and the date that the reporting party no longer holds the requisite reasonable belief that privacy law bars reporting. 

View the CFTC press release. 

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released an advisory indicating support for the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s March 2014 guidance entitled “External audits of banks” for internationally active banks. The advisory notes that while the guidance is largely consistent with existing US standards and practices, there are certain differences between the principles and the expectations of US regulators. The advisory defines “internationally active banks” as insured depository institutions that have consolidated total assets of $250 billion or more, consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign exposure of $10 billion or more and US depository institution holding companies that meet, or have a subsidiary depository institution that meets, the same standards (with the calculation of consolidated total assets excluding assets held by insurance underwriting subsidiaries, in the case of bank holding companies). Key differences highlighted in the advisory include: (i) unlike the guidance, US standards and practices do not require “tendering”, i.e., putting an external audit contract out for bid, but the US banking agencies recommend that institutions consider whether such practice is appropriate; and (ii) while the US banking agencies encourage open communication between external auditors and a financial institution’s supervisor, there is no generally applicable requirement for an external auditor to report directly to the institution’s primary regulators.

View the interagency advisory statement. 

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued an order under the Commodity Exchange Act delegating to the National Futures Association certain reporting and administrative responsibilities, effective March 1, 2016. The NFA will receive, review and maintain notices of swap valuation disputes in excess of $20 million USD filed by swap dealers and major swap participants pursuant to CFTC regulation 23.502(c). The NFA will also be responsible for providing summaries and periodic reports related to these notices to the CFTC. The NFA is not authorized to render “no-action” positions, exemptions or interpretations with respect to applicable disclosure, reporting, recordkeeping and registration requirements.

View the order. 

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published revised standards on minimum capital requirements for market risk, which form part of the new market risk framework as endorsed by the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision, known as GHOS, the Basel Committee's governing body. Improvements in the new risk framework include: (i) a revised boundary between the banking and trading books that will reduce scope for arbitrage; (ii) a revised internal models approach with more coherent and comprehensive risk capture; (iii) an enhanced model approval process and more prudent recognition of hedging and portfolio diversification; and (iv) a revised standardized approach that serves as a credible fall-back and floor to the model-based approach and facilitates more consistent and comparable reporting of market risk across banks and jurisdictions. The Basel Committee will also finalize its efforts to address the problem of excessive variability in risk-weighted assets by the end of this year. These efforts will include a proposal to remove the internal model approach for credit risk and limits on the use of internal models for credit risk (in particular, through the use of floors). The GHOS also agreed that the final design and calibration of the leverage ratio should be based on a Tier 1 definition of capital and should comprise a minimum level of 3%. The Basel Committee will finalize the calibration in 2016 to allow time for the leverage ratio to be implemented as a Pillar 1 measure by January 1, 2018.
 
View the revised minimum capital requirements for market risk.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on proposals to introduce new rules on buy-outs of deferred variable remuneration, i.e. where a firm compensates a new employee for deferred variable remuneration not received from a previous employer due to the employee having left the former firm. The new rules would apply to PRA-regulated banks, building societies and designated investment firms and would amend the existing Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook (known as the PRA Remuneration Code until the PRA and Financial Conduct Authority Remuneration Codes were split). Current remuneration rules, which seek to encourage greater alignment between risk and reward as well as more effective risk management,  allow employers to withhold or reduce unpaid or unvested awards (i.e. the rules of malus) or recoup paid or vested awards (i.e. the rules of clawback). The practice of buy-outs could undermine these rules as employees could potentially evade being accountable for actions they carried out in their previous employment by moving to a new employer who buys-out their cancelled deferred remuneration. The PRA proposes that buy-out terms in contracts between new employers and employees should allow for malus or clawback to be applied following a notification by the old employer if an employee is found guilty of misconduct or risk management failings in his previous employment. The PRA is proposing to allow new employers to apply for a waiver for each employee if they believe the old employer's decision to apply malus or clawback was unfair or unreasonable. Responses to the consultation are due by April 13, 2016.
 
View the consultation paper.

The European Banking Authority published: (i) revised final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the uniform formats and date for disclosure of values used to identify Global Systemically Important Institutions; (ii) revised final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the methodology for the identification of G-SIIs; and (iii) draft revised Guidelines on the further specification of the indicators of global systemic importance and their disclosure under the Capital Requirements Directive IV. 

Read more.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission issued its Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations’ 2016 priorities. Areas of focus for this year include liquidity controls, public pension advisers, product promotion, and two investment products – exchange-traded funds and variable annuities. The priorities also provide for continuing emphasis on protecting investors in ongoing risk areas such as cybersecurity, microcap fraud, fee selection, and reverse churning. The examination priorities address issues across a variety of financial institutions, including investment advisers, investment companies, broker-dealers, transfer agents, clearing agencies, and national securities exchanges. The priorities may be adjusted in light of market conditions, industry developments and ongoing risk assessment activities. OCIE selected the priorities in consultation with certain SEC policy divisions and regional offices, the SEC’s Investor Advocate, and other regulators.

View the SEC press release.

View the SEC examination priorities for 2016.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that Mr. David Silberman will serve as Acting Deputy Director beginning the week of January 11, 2106, replacing Meredith Fuchs. Mr. Silberman previously served as Associate Director for Research, Markets, and Regulations. Mr. Silberman will serve as Acting Deputy Director while a search for a replacement is conducted.

View the CFPB press release.

The European Central Bank's Banking Supervision division published its priorities for 2016. Under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation, the ECB is responsible for the direct prudential supervision of the largest Eurozone banks and indirectly responsible for prudentially supervising the smaller Eurozone banks. The priorities, which aim to direct the ECB's supervision of the largest Eurozone banks, are business model and profitability risk, credit risk, capital adequacy, risk governance and data quality and liquidity. The ECB will be implementing initiatives around the priorities during 2016, including thematic reviews and holding dialogue with the banks.
 
View the 2016 SSM Priorities.

The Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority published proposed changes to their notification rules and forms under the Senior Managers and Certification Regimes. The regulators are proposing the changes in light of the changes to the regime that have been proposed by the UK Government, including extending the Regime to all financial services firms, removing obligation on a firm to notify the PRA or FCA when it knows or suspects that a senior manager or certified person has failed to comply with the conduct rules and replacing the presumption of responsibility with a duty of responsibility. It remains to be seen whether Parliament will approve those changes proposed by the Government. An amending Order, published in December 2015, stops the above-mentioned notification requirement and the presumption of responsibility from coming into force on March 7, 2016 – the date when the remainder of the new Regime will come into effect. The regulators therefore intend to amend their rules and forms to reflect the position that those provisions of the Regime will not enter into force on March 7, 2016. The PRA has also published an updated Supervisory Statement to take into account the changes. The consultations close on February 8, 2016.
 
View the PRA consultation paper.
 
View the FCA consultation paper.
 
View the PRA's updated Supervisory Statement.

The European Commission published a report on the effect of the revised International Accounting Standard 19 on the volatility of own funds of banks and investment firms. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the Commission to assess whether the revised IAS 19 and the requirement on firms to deduct defined-benefit pension fund assets from Common Equity Tier 1 items for the purpose of calculating own funds would impact the volatility of the firm's own funds. The Commission has concluded that the potential additional volatility of own funds introduced by the revision of IAS 19 is limited and that the impact due to initial application has been mitigated by the transitional measures included in the CRR. The Commission therefore does not intend to propose amendments to the CRR in this regard.
 
View the report.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced the end of its Mortgage Operations Counterparty Pilot Program on December 31, 2015. The program, first announced in August 2014, was intended to discover ways to expand the range of firms acting as counterparties in the Federal Reserve’s open market operations, and to analyze the extent to which firms beyond the primary dealer community can raise the New York Fed’s operational capacity and resiliency in its monetary policy operations. Three firms participated in the MOC pilot program and began transacting with the Open Market Trading Desk in secondary market outright operations of agency mortgage-backed securities in December 2014. The results of the pilot programs will provide useful inputs in the Desk’s ongoing evaluations of the Federal Reserve’s counterparty framework.

View the New York Fed press release. 

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed a rule offering an alternative to the requirement for foreign natural persons to provide fingerprints when applying for CFTC registration. The proposal provides that any such person’s registered firm may complete a criminal history background check instead of submitting fingerprints. The proposal generally codifies CFTC Staff Letters 12-49 and 13-29 and would supersede those letters, if adopted. Comments on the proposed rule are due on or before February 11, 2016. 

View the CFTC press release. 

View the proposed rule. 

A European Central Bank Recommendation on dividend distribution policies for Eurozone banks was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The recommendation is aimed at significant supervised entities (i.e. significant banks) and significant supervised groups (each as defined in the Single Supervisory Mechanism Framework Regulation) as well as national regulators. Under the SSM Regulation, the ECB is responsible for the direct prudential supervision of significant Eurozone banks. The Recommendation states that banks must use conservative and prudent assumptions when establishing dividend policies so that any applicable capital requirements, for example minimum capital requirements or countercyclical capital and systemic buffers, are still met after any distribution. The recommendation also makes suggestions for different categories of banks paying dividends for the 2015 financial year in 2016: (i) banks that satisfy the applicable capital requirements and have reached their fully loaded (i.e. calculated without applying the transitional provisions as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation) capital ratios as at December 31, 2015 should distribute net profits in dividends conservatively; (ii) banks that satisfy the applicable capital requirements, but have not reached their fully loaded ratios as at December 31, 2015 should distribute net profits in dividends conservatively and in principle should only pay out dividends if a linear path to the required loaded capital requirements is secured; and (iii) banks that do not satisfy the applicable capital requirements should not distribute dividends. The Recommendation also states that should a bank not be able to comply with the ECB's Recommendation due to a legal obligation to pay out dividends, it should contact its supervisory team immediately.

View the Recommendation.

The revised EU Payment Services Directive, known as PSD2, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The aims of PSD2, which focuses on electronic payments and payment services within the EU, include making payments between Member States as secure, easy and efficient as those made within a Member State, regulating new types of payment services and payment services providers which are currently unregulated and stimulating competition in the electronic payments market. Member States must transpose PSD2 into their national laws by January 13, 2018 and apply those laws from that date, subject to certain exceptions and transitional measures. PSD2 will appeal the current Payment Services Directive with effect from January 13, 2018.
 
View PSD2.

The European Securities and Markets Authority launched a consultation on proposed Guidelines on transaction reporting, reference data, order record keeping and clock synchronization. ESMA is required to prepare the guidelines under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, together known as MiFID II. The proposed Guidelines are based on ESMA's final draft Regulatory Technical Standards relating to transaction reporting, reference data, order record keeping and clock synchronization which are still due to be endorsed by the European Commission. The proposed Guidelines may therefore need to be amended, depending on the adopted version of the RTS. The proposed Guidelines aim to assist investment firms, approved reporting mechanisms, trading venues and systematic internalizers in complying with the provisions of the RTS, focusing on the preparation of transaction reports and order data records for various scenarios. Responses to the consultation are due by March 23, 2016 and ESMA aims to publish the final Guidelines in the second half of 2016. MiFID II will apply directly across the EU from January 3, 2017.
 
View the consultation paper.

The EU Regulation on the Reporting and Transparency of Securities Financing Transactions and of Reuse, known as the SFTR was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The aim of the SFTR is to improve the transparency of securities lending, repurchase transactions, reverse repurchase transactions, buy-sell back or sell-buy back transactions and margin lending transactions which will help reduce the likelihood of banks seeking to avoid rules applicable to them by moving certain of their activities to the shadow banking sector. The SFTR requires: (i) all securities financing transactions, subject to certain exceptions for central banks and similar bodies, to be reported to EU recognized trade repositories; (ii) investment funds to disclose their use of SFTs to investors in regular reports and pre-investment documents; and (iii) minimum conditions to be met on the reuse of collateral, such as disclosure of risks and the need to obtain prior consent. The SFTR also makes certain amendments to the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, including inserting provisions through which equivalence decisions for third country trading venues for the purpose of OTC derivatives can be made and adding a number of authorities to the list of authorities to which trade repositories must provide trade reporting information. The SFTR will apply directly across the EU from January 12, 2016 subject to certain exceptions which will apply at a later date, including the reporting obligation (which is being phased in according to counterparty type), the transparency obligations on management companies and Alternative Investment Fund Managers, and the restrictions on rehypothecation.
 
View the Regulation.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a final report and final Guidelines on cross-selling practices within the meaning of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The Guidelines will apply from January 3, 2017 to the national regulators responsible for the conduct of business supervisory oversight of investment firms and credit institutions when providing investment services and to management companies and external Alternative Investment Fund Managers when they provide investment services under the Directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive respectively. Initially, ESMA had consulted jointly with the European Banking Authority and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority on joint guidelines for the banking and insurance sectors. However, following feedback received to that consultation, it was decided that ESMA should adopt guidelines solely on the basis of the revised MiFID. Firms should note, however, that the final Guidelines do not affect their obligations to comply with other conduct of business standards that may be applicable to them.

Read more.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published a report on the mechanisms for trading venues to effectively manage electronic trading risks and plans for business continuity. The report focuses on how trading venues manage technology, in particular, the potential risks that technological innovations pose to the markets. It stems from an IOSCO investigation into causes of the recent market disruptions which sought to identify steps taken by market participants and regulators to address the causes and probe whether the IOSCO High-Level Principles for Business Continuity issued in 2006 should be updated. In addition, IOSCO surveyed trading venues across more than 30 jurisdictions. The report discusses IOSCO's findings based on responses to the survey, makes recommendations to regulators and proposes sound practices for trading venues. IOSCO recommends that regulators should require trading venues to put mechanisms in place to help ensure the resiliency, reliability and integrity of critical systems and should require trading venues to establish, maintain and implement an appropriate business continuity plan.

Read more.

The International Organization for Securities Commissions published a report on market intermediary business continuity and recovery planning. The report sets two standards for regulators of market intermediaries and recommends sound practices for regulators to consider in their supervision of market intermediaries. The IOSCO standards state that regulators should require market intermediaries to create and maintain written business continuity plans and to update the plans in the event of any material change to the intermediaries' operations, structure, business or location and to conduct an annual review of the plan. The IOSCO recommendations on sound practices for regulators of intermediaries cover setting the components of a market intermediary's business continuity plan and addressing the need for data protection and client privacy, in particular, against cyber-attacks. IOSCO recognizes that the sound practices are flexible and may be tailored to the size and needs of a market intermediary.

View the report.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published its final report on sound practices at large intermediaries relating to the assessment of creditworthiness and the use of external credit ratings. The report analyses responses to the survey conducted by IOSCO and proposes sound practices for regulators of large intermediary firms to consider in supervising such firms. Large intermediary firms may also find the proposed practices useful when they consider implementing their internal credit assessment policies and procedures. The report is intended to enhance the implementation of the Principles for Reducing Reliance on CRA Ratings issued by the Financial Stability Board. The proposed sound practices for regulators include requiring large intermediaries to: (i) establish an independent credit assessment function; (ii) involve senior management in implementing the credit assessment process; (iii) ensure the relevant committees have sufficient information on the credit risks posed to their firms; (iv) establish an appropriate oversight structure to ensure the credit assessment process is properly implemented; (v) avoid exposure to particular credit risks whenever the firm does not have the internal capability to independently and adequately assess the exposure; (vi) incorporate a wide variety of qualitative measures into robust credit assessment processes; and (vii) avoid mechanistically relying on external credit rating agency ratings.

View the report.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission issued (i) an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking, seeking public comment for new requirements for transfer agents and (ii) a concept release on the SEC's broader review of transfer agent regulation. Among other requirements, the ANPR proposes to impose on transfer agents revised registration and annual reporting requirements, and revised requirements relating to the safeguarding of funds and securities, antifraud requirements in connection with the issuance and transfer of restricted securities, and to impose new guidelines relating to cybersecurity and information technology.

The SEC concept release addresses a broader range of other issues and it is possible that the various proposals will be acted on separately by the SEC. Issues addressed in the concept release include the processing of book entry securities, recordkeeping issues, administration of issuer plans, outsourcing, the role of transfer agents to mutual funds, and crowdfunding.Comments on both the ANPR and the concept release must be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register.

View the SEC ANPR and concept release. 
 

The European Banking Authority published proposed Guidelines on compensation policies and procedures related to the sale and provision of retail banking products and services. The EBA is seeking to address the issues arising out of the recent cases on misconduct and mis-selling by staff in financial institutions where poor remuneration policies and practices have been identified as a root cause. The proposed Guidelines apply to the remuneration paid to staff employed by banks, credit intermediaries, payment institutions and electronic money institutions when selling mortgages, personal loans, deposits, payment accounts, payment services and/or electronic money. The proposed Guidelines set out the design of remuneration policies and practices, including prevention of conflicts of interest, using quantitative and qualitative criteria for determining variable remuneration and how the rights and interests of consumers should be taken into account. The EBA also proposes that remuneration policies and practices should be documented, and that such documentation should be retained for five years, be accessible to staff and made available to national regulators on request. Responsibility for complying with the Guidelines would rest with the management body of a firm. The consultation closes on March 22, 2016.
 
View the consultation paper.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on sound remuneration policies and an Opinion on the application of proportionality to the remuneration provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive. The final Guidelines are applicable to banks and investment firms and cover all staff with particular aspects focusing on staff whose professional activities have a material impact on a firm's risk profile. The Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2017, a year later than originally intended. Therefore, firms do not need to amend their existing compensation practices for the 2016 performance year.  The Guidelines set out detailed requirements for remuneration policies, the related governance arrangements and processes for implementing remuneration policies, updating the guidelines on remuneration policies published by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors to take into account changes introduced by the revised CRD IV, technical standards on the identification of staff and on the instruments which can be used for variable remuneration, the EBA's opinion on the use of allowances and industry developments.

Read more.

The International Organization for Securities Commissions published a statement on addressing the regulation of crowdfunding and a report on its survey conducted on how crowdfunding is regulated in twenty-three IOSCO jurisdictions. The objectives of the statement and the report are to highlight emerging trends and issues in crowdfunding and to enhance IOSCO's understanding of how jurisdictions have adopted regulations on crowdfunding. Crowdfunding provides an alternative capital raising avenue, particularly for small enterprises and start-ups, which is beneficial in supporting economic growth but which may pose risks for investor protection. IOSCO's survey found that most jurisdictions had implemented regulations to address issues on conflicts of interest, data protection and fraud. IOSCO believes that more attention is required on the risk of default or failure of start-ups, potential failure of crowdfunding platforms, illiquidity, money laundering, fraud and terrorist financing as well as the suitability of any particular platform for an investor. IOSCO urges policy makers and regulators to consider the steps taken in some jurisdictions to address the risks of crowdfunding, including the imposition of registration requirements for funding portals, setting disclosure requirements for issuers and funding portals and requiring the appointment of a third party custodian to hold investor assets. In addition, the cross-border risks involved in crowdfunding should either be addressed by restricting cross-border fundraising or implementing a coordinated approach between relevant jurisdictions.

View the statement.

View the survey.

The European Commission launched a consultation which seeks to collect information on how institutional investors, asset managers and other service providers in the investment chain take into account, for the purpose of investment decisions, sustainability information and performance of companies or assets. The consultation is linked to the Commission's Communication on Long-Term Financing of the European Economy as well as the action plan for building a Capital Markets Union. The consultation is open until March 25, 2016.

View the consultation.

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on proposed Guidelines on stress testing and supervisory stress testing. The proposed Guidelines cover: (i) internal stress testing by firms, providing detailed guidance for firms when designing and conducting a stress testing program; (ii) the assessment of firms' stress testing by national regulators with the aim of ensuring convergence in the context of the supervisory review and evaluation process; and (iii) supervisory stress testing. The proposed Guidelines provide common organizational requirements, methodologies and processes for firms performing internal stress tests as part of their risk management processes and common methodologies for national regulators when conducting supervisory stress tests but do not set methodologies for the EBA's stress testing in cooperation with national regulators. Once finalized, the Guidelines will replace the current guidelines issued by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors. The consultation is open until March 18, 2016. The EBA aims to publish the final Guidelines in Q2 2016 and expects that they will apply from Q4 2016.

View the proposed Guidelines.

The European Banking Authority published an Opinion, dated December 16, 2015, addressed to national regulators and the European Commission on the interaction of Pillar 1, Pillar 2 and combined buffer requirements and restrictions on distributions. The EBA considers that national regulators should ensure that the Common Equity Tier 1 capital that is used for calculation of the maximum distributable amount is limited to the amount not used to meet a firm's Pillar 1 and 2 own funds requirements. Also, national regulators should require firms to disclose MDA-relevant capital requirements. The EBA is also of the view that the Commission should review the MDA provisions of the Capital Requirements Directive, aiming to eliminate inconsistencies in the application of the provisions across the EU and should review the prohibition on distribution, in particular, as it relates to Additional Tier 1 instruments when no profits are made in a given year.

View the Opinion.

The Single Resolution Board announced the first members appointed to its Appeal Panel. The nominated members are: Ms Hélène Vletter Van Dort (Chair), Mr Yves Herinckx (Vice-Chair), Mr Kaarlo Jännäri, Mr Marco Lamandini, Mr Christopher Pleister. Ms Eleni Dendrinou-Louri and Mr Luis Silva Morais have been nominated as alternates to the Appeal Panel. The appointments are for a term of five years, starting on January 1, 2016. The Appeal Panel is established to hear appeals brought by individuals or legal persons, including resolution authorities, against a decision of the SRB that is either addressed, or of direct and individual concern, to that person.

View the announcement.

A Commission Implementing Directive on the procedures and requirements for protection of individuals that report an actual or potential infringement of the Market Abuse Regulation to a national regulator was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Implementing Directive sets out the procedures for reporting, record-keeping requirements, measures for the protection of whistle blowers that are working under a contract of employment and arrangements for the protection of personal data of whistle blowers. Member States must transpose the requirements of the Implementing Directive into their national laws by July 3, 2016 and apply the new legislation from that date. The Market Abuse Regulation sets out the EU requirements on insider dealing, the unlawful disclosure of inside information and market manipulation and will apply directly across the EU from July 3, 2016.

View the Implementing Directive.

The European Banking Authority published a report on its analysis and market practice assessment of synthetic securitization in Europe. The report makes recommendations for the European Commission's proposed legislative amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation and proposed securitization regulation, which provide for the preferential regulatory treatment of simple, transparent and standardized securitizations. The EBA's analysis supports the approach taken by the Commission in its proposed securitization framework, which provides for a different regulatory treatment of on-balance sheet synthetic securitization positions retained by originator banks. The EBA concurs that the proposed framework should not be extended to all synthetic securitizations applicable to all investors across asset types. The EBA recommends that certain criteria be met for eligibility of balance sheet synthetic transactions, including requirements that originator banks should meet to transfer the risk of eligible transactions to public or private investors. In particular, the EBA advises the Commission to consider amending its proposal to include transactions in which private investors provide credit protection in the form of cash. The report follows the EBA's report in July 2015 on a qualifying framework for traditional securitization.

View the report.

View the Commission's proposed securitization framework.

The European Banking Authority published a report, dated December 15, 2015, on the necessity for adding stable funding requirements to the EU regulatory capital requirements framework. The Capital Requirements Regulation requires the EBA to report to the Commission on whether and how it would be appropriate to ensure that banks and investment firms use stable sources of funding and to provide an assessment of the impact of a stable funding requirement on the businesses and risk profiles of firms in the EU, the financial markets, the economy and trade financing, as well as potential methodologies for determining the amount of stable funding available to and required by firms. The mandate was included in the CRR in response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's publication in 2010 of a net stable funding ratio (known as the NSFR) to be put in place by 2018. The NSFR requires firms to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to their assets and off-balance-sheet activities over a period of one year.

Read more.

The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions published proposed guidance on the Unique Product Identifier which will allow for the identification of OTC derivatives products that authorities require, or may require in the future, to be reported to trade repositories.  The UPI is made up of an OTC derivatives products classification system and an associated code (i.e. how the UPI will be represented in trade reports). A separate consultation will be launched on the code at a later date. Currently, OTC derivative trades are reported to 20 trade repositories authorized for some asset classes. However, in order to properly mitigate systemic risk and protect against market abuse, it is necessary for data across trade repositories to be aggregated so that national regulators have a comprehensive view of the OTC derivatives markets and trading activity. The CPMI and IOSCO have been tasked by the Financial Stability Board with developing global guidance on the harmonization of data elements reported to trade repositories, including a Unique Transaction Identifier and a UPI. The CPMI and IOSCO are proposing principles and high-level business specifications for the UPI as well as two approaches for the granularity of the UPI classification system. In particular, feedback is sought on potential implementation challenges. The consultation closes on February 24, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision launched a consultation on the identification, assessment and measurement of step-in risk. The proposed framework would form the basis for identifying, assessing and addressing step-in risk that is potentially embedded in banks' relationships with shadow banking entities. The Basel Committee refers to step-in risk as the risk that a bank may provide financial support to an entity that is under financial stress beyond or without any contractual obligations to do so to protect itself from any adverse reputational risk that may result from its connection to the entity. The proposals only apply to unconsolidated entities (i.e. entities that are outside of the regulatory scope of consolidation). The proposed framework includes descriptions of the relationships and indicators that characterize such relationships between banks and shadow banking entities, such as capital ties, sponsorship, provision of financial facilities, decision-making and operational links. The Basel Committee proposes that any step-in risk that is identified could be addressed through prudential measures, such as through quantitative requirements or by bringing the relevant entity within regulatory consolidation. The consultation closes on March 17, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

The International Organization for Securities Commissions published a report on the existing tools available to fund managers for liquidity management in collective investment schemes. The report, which covers the frameworks in 26 jurisdictions, provides a global view of the tools available to fund managers, particular in extreme situations, and the funds to which those tools apply, including the availability of tools in particular jurisdictions, their use and effectiveness and any system-wide implications that the tools pose. The report is part of IOSCO's work on the collection of data about asset management activity. IOSCO is considering developing guidance on liquidity risk management that would go beyond its 2013 Principles of Liquidity Risk Management for Collective Investment Schemes, which would include stress testing.

View the report.

View the IOSCO Principles.

The UK Government launched a consultation on further proposals for implementing the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive into UK law following the identification of a few changes that the Government believes will clarify and strengthen the UK's transposition of the BRRD. The proposals would amend the Banking Act 2009, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and certain secondary legislation and a draft Order was published with the consultation paper.

Read more.

An amending Order was published which stops certain provisions of the Senior Manager & Certification Regime from coming into effect on March 7, 2016, the date from which the SM&CR becomes effective for banks, building societies, credit unions and investment firms designated by the Prudential Regulation Authority.  The provisions that will not come into effect on March 7, 2016 are: (i) the obligation on firms to notify the PRA or Financial Conduct Authority when it knows or suspects that a senior manager or certified person has failed to comply with the conduct rules; and (ii) the presumption of responsibility for senior managers. Certain changes to the regime have been proposed by the UK Government, including extending the regime to all financial services firms and replacing the presumption of responsibility with a duty of responsibility. It remains to be seen whether Parliament will approve those changes. In the meantime, the PRA advises firms to prepare for implementation of the regime on the basis that the above two provisions will not come into effect in March 2016.

View the Order.

View the PRA's related statement.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a final report and final guidelines on the assessment of knowledge and competence of individuals providing investment advice or information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on behalf of investment firms. Under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, an investment firm is required to ensure that individuals giving investment advice or providing information about financial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients on its behalf have the necessary knowledge and competence to do so and to satisfy the firm's obligations on suitability, appropriateness and reporting and provision of information to clients. An investment firm may be requested to demonstrate that the requirements are met on request by its national regulator. National regulators must publish the criteria that will be used to assess such knowledge and competence. ESMA's guidelines, which apply to national regulators and investment firms, specify the criteria for the assessment of knowledge and competence, establishing the minimum standards that staff providing the relevant services should meet. The guidelines will come into effect on January 3, 2017.

View the guidelines.

The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the valuation of derivatives for the purpose of bailing in derivative liabilities. Under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, a resolution authority may bail-in relevant derivative liabilities provided that the authority complies with certain conditions including exercising the bail-in power only upon or after closing out the derivatives and ensuring that derivatives subject to a netting agreement are bailed-in on a net basis following the terms of the netting agreement. Before exercising the bail-in power, a resolution authority is required to ensure that an independent valuation of the assets and liabilities of a firm is carried out. For derivative liabilities, the valuation will determine a value of those derivative liabilities at the moment of exercise of the resolution power. The EBA's final draft RTS provide a methodology for resolution authorities to follow when comparing the destruction in value that would arise from the close-out with the losses that those derivatives would incur in a bail-in, principles for determining the point in time at which the value of a derivative should be established and measures for establishing the value of classes of derivatives. The EBA has submitted the final draft RTS to the European Commission for endorsement. Member states are required to implement the bail-in tool by January 1, 2016.

View the final draft RTS.

The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards and final guidelines on the business reorganization plans that a firm that has been recapitalized using the bail-in tool is required to produce. Under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, a firm that has been recapitalized through a bail-in must: (i) produce a reorganization plan that sets out how the firm will be restored to long-term viability; (ii) submit progress reports twice annually throughout the reorganization period. The BRRD requires the EBA to develop RTS on the minimum content of the business reorganization plans and progress reports and to issue guidelines for national regulators and resolution authorities to assess the reorganization plan. The final draft RTS require a business plan to identify and address the cause of the firm's failure, demonstrate that the firm can operate viably in the long-term, address shortcomings in the firm's business model (even if not related to the firm's failure), include financial performance projections with relevant milestones and indicators. The progress report should report on implementation of the reorganization plan and include proposed amendments to the plan, if necessary. The EBA's guidelines provide national regulators and resolution authorities with the means to assess whether the business reorganization plan is credible and realistic and consistent with other business plans prepared by the firm in parallel. Verification by independent entities, such as auditors, should be possible, where necessary.

View the final draft RTS and guidelines.

The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards specifying the information on financial contracts that a firm may be required to maintain. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive gives resolution authorities the power temporarily to suspend the termination rights of any counterparty to a contract with a firm that is under resolution. Both national regulators and resolution authorities may require a firm to maintain detailed records of financial contracts (generally, these are securities contracts, commodities contracts, futures and forwards contracts, swap agreements, inter-bank borrowing agreements) on whether or not they include suspensory provisions. The EBA's final draft RTS set out the minimum set of information on financial contracts that should be included in the detailed records held by a firm which includes information such as whether a contract includes contractual recognition of resolution powers, information on value and valuation, collateral, termination rights, maturity and netting arrangements. The RTS also prescribe the circumstances in which the requirement to hold such records should be imposed and take a wide approach by including all firms or entities that might be subject to resolution actions. The EBA considers that firms that would be placed into an insolvency procedure need not be included but the European authority does not prohibit national regulators or resolution authorities from imposing similar requirements on such firms, or any other firms.

View the final draft RTS.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions announced it appointed Paul Andrews as its new Secretary General, replacing David Wright from March 2016 for a three-year term.

View the press release.

The European Banking Authority published final draft Regulatory Technical Standards which set out the prudential regime for central securities depositories under the Central Securities Depositories Regulation. A distinction is made in CSDR between CSDs that offer banking-type ancillary services and which are also authorised as credit institutions (i.e. banks) and CSDs that are not permitted to offer ancillary banking services. The final draft RTS cover: (i) the capital requirements applicable to all CSDs; (ii) the additional risk-based capital surcharge which takes into account the risks, including intra-day credit and liquidity risks, that arise from the ancillary banking services of CSDs; and (iii) the framework and tools for monitoring, measuring, managing, reporting and disclosing the above-mentioned credit and liquidity risks. CSDs that carry out ancillary banking services will also need to comply with the Capital Requirements Regulation and the final draft RTS impose stricter requirements than those in CRR in some respects. The final draft RTS have been sent to the European Commission for endorsement. The CSDR, which introduces common standards for settlements across the EU, will apply directly across the EU from January 1, 2023 to transferable securities issued after that date and from January 1, 2025 to all transferable securities.

View the final draft RTS.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its third progress report on the adoption by banks of its Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. The Principles must be implemented by global systemically important banks by January 1, 2016, and aim to strengthen risk data aggregation and risk reporting at banks so that risk management and decision-making practices are improved. The report details the progress that G-SIBs have made in order to comply with the Principles. The Basel Committee recommends that: (i) banks and national regulators should continue to promote understanding of the Principles; (ii) national regulators should conduct more in-depth/specialised examinations on data aggregation requirements to evaluate weaknesses; (iii) banks should clearly articulate risk data aggregation and risk reporting expectations, in line with their risk appetite in both normal and stress periods; (iv) banks should have appropriate governance arrangements in place to oversee manual processes; (v) banks should consider reducing the complexity of their systems to meet the data aggregation requirements; (vi) auditors should undertake an independent assessment of each bank's compliance with the Principles in early 2016, reporting any necessary remedial action to the bank's board; and (vii) banks that are unable to comply by the deadline should agree plans to do so with their national regulator. The Basel Committee also recommends that national regulators apply the Principles to domestic systemically important banks (known as D-SIBs) from three years after they have been identified as such.

View the report.