HM Treasury published the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Regulations 2016 together with an explanatory memorandum. The Regulations implement the provisions of the European UCITS V Directive and relate to depositaries, remuneration as well as sanctions for breaching the Directive. The Regulations also set out certain requirements for the Financial Conduct Authority relating to information that is provided and reported to the European Securities and Markets Authority. The Regulations include: (i) amendments to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, which allows for the disciplinary powers that may be taken under FSMA against authorised persons, approved persons and senior managers, also being exercisable in the case of contravention of these Regulations; (ii) provisions enabling the FCA to exercise powers to cancel an authorised person’s permission to carry on regulated activities in cases where there have been serious breaches of the requirements imposed by the Regulations; and (iii) provisions requiring the FCA to establish procedures for receiving and following up on reports on infringements under the Directive and providing ESMA with aggregated information on all penalties and measures that have been imposed under the Directive, on an annual basis. The Regulations enter into force on March 18, 2016.
 
View the Regulations.
 
View the Explanatory Memorandum.

The US House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee’s Capital Markets Subcommittee held a hearing on legislation that would clarify the name-sharing provision of the Volcker Rule. Specifically, the Financial Services Committee discussed provisions of H.R. 4096, the Investor Clarity and Bank Parity Act, which would “correct a statutory error” in the Volcker Rule which restricts the ability of a banking entity to sponsor a covered fund, specifically by prohibiting name-sharing between a banking entity’s affiliates and a covered fund. The bill would permit investment adviser affiliates to share a name with a covered fund if the investment adviser is not (or does not control) an insured depository institution or is not treated as a bank holding company under Section 8 of the International Banking Act of 1978. The Financial Services Committee will consider a markup of the bill in a hearing scheduled on March 2, 2016.

View the full text of the markup.
 

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association published a paper which analyzes the regulatory frameworks in the US and EU for the supervision and oversight of trading platforms and aims to provide principles for the recognition of EU trading platforms by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Both the US and the EU have introduced rules which require certain derivatives to be traded on trading platforms. The US rules, which came into force in October 2013, provide that US persons may only trade the relevant derivatives on platforms that have registered as a Swap Execution Facility and that are subject to the oversight of the CFTC. The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation, which is currently due to come into force on January 3, 2017 unless proposed legislation is passed to delay it for a year, requires certain derivatives to be traded on EU trading venues. ISDA considers that the CFTC should be able to make comparability decisions, deeming EU trading platforms comparable with those in the US, by focusing on the outcomes and core objectives of the EU regime, thereby recognizing EU trading platforms as SEFs. This would allow US persons to trade on an EU trading venue in compliance with the US trade execution rules.
 
View ISDA's paper.

The Financial Action Task Force published final Guidance on a Risk-Based Approach for Money or Value Transfer Services. This non-binding guidance is applicable to the entire MVTS sector but is primarily aimed at non-banking MVTS providers. The purpose of the guidance is to assist MVTS providers and associated banks, financial institutions and competent authorities in the development of a common understanding of a risk-based approach to anti money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism. The risk-based approach assists in the implementation of the revised FATF International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation published in 2012. The Guidance outlines key elements in the application of a risk-based approach to AML and counter-terrorist financing in the context of MVTS.

View the FATF Guidance.

View the FATF Recommendations.

The European Banking Authority has launched the next round of EU-wide bank stress tests and released the associated methodology and macroeconomic scenarios for its application. The test will involve a sample of 51 EU banks, covering 70% of the region's banking sector. The purpose of the test is to provide a common analytical framework for supervisors, banks and other market participants to assess and compare the stress of EU banks when faced with economic shocks. The common methodology of the test is to assess solvency and the main types of risk faced by EU banks: credit and securitization, market, sovereign, funding and operational and conduct risk. The adverse scenario posed by the test highlights the most material threats to the stability of the EU banking sector: (i) sudden increased risk compounded by a reduction in secondary market liquidity; (ii) weak profitability prospects; (iii) low nominal growth and rising debt sustainability concerns; and (iv) stress in the growing shadow banking sector fueled by liquidity risk. An EU-wide asset quality review will not be conducted before the 2016 test, as was the case in 2014. National regulators regularly assess asset quality as part of their supervisory work. The EBA has not set a single capital threshold. The EBA expects the results of the stress test to be published in the third quarter of 2016. The results will be used to assist the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Processes when determining appropriate capital resources. National regulators will review the results and determine whether any supervisory measure is necessary to address any capital shortfall. 

View the EBA press release and related documents.

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued the “Quarterly Banking Profile” which summarized financial results for the fourth quarter of 2015 for commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the FDIC. As a general matter, FDIC-insured institutions reported aggregated net income of $40.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2015, an increase of 11.9% (or $4.4 billion) from the previous year. In a statement, FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg noted that the banking industry improved on both revenue and income from the previous year, but noted that banks should remain vigilant to continued interest-rate risk, credit risk and evolving market conditions.

View more information on the FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile.

View the full text of Chairman Gruenberg’s statement.
 

The Financial Stability Board published proposals for the identification of data elements for monitoring non-cash collateral re-use and for the development of a measure of non-cash collateral re-use. The proposals are part of the FSB's global securities financing data collection initiative, the Standards for which were published in November 2015. The Standards identify a data element on collateral re-use eligibility to be collected for collateral received or posted for securities financing transactions by national regulators for provision to the FSB.  The FSB is proposing to add possible measures of non-cash collateral re-use and related data elements into the Standards to help evaluate global trends on collateral re-use and to assess financial stability risks. Comments on the FSB's proposals are requested by April 22, 2016. The FSB intends to develop recommendations by the end of 2016.
 
View the FSB proposals.
 
View the FSB Standards for securities financing data collection.

HM Treasury published the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (Designated Representative Bodies) Order 2016 together with an explanatory memorandum. Under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, representatives designated by the Treasury can issue complaints to the Payments Systems Regulator (which was itself established under the Act) when one or more features of a UK operated market (or a market that operates only in part in the UK) for services provided by payment systems are, or appear to be, significantly damaging the interests of payment service users. The Order is the first to designate representatives that are able to issue complaints under the Act and aims to ensure that misconduct or market failure in the payment system sector is brought to the attention of the PSR and investigated. The Order designates five representatives: (i) the National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux; (ii) the Consumers’ Association; (iii) the Consumer Council for Northern Ireland; (iv) the National Federation of Self Employed and Small Businesses; and (v) Age UK. The Order comes into force on April 1, 2016.
 
View the Order.
 
View the Explanatory Memorandum.

The Single Resolution Board announced that it had started to collect data for the purposes of resolution planning and the determination of the Minimum Requirement for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (known as MREL) for banking groups within its remit. The SRB is the resolution authority for all banking groups and entities as well as cross-border groups that are subject to direct prudential supervision by the European Central Bank (i.e., for banks within the Banking Union). The Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation requires the SRB to set the MREL during 2016. The SRB published a Liability Data Template for firms to provide it with the required information, prioritizing the minimum data required by EU legislation and requesting that other data be provided on a priority or best efforts basis in 2016.

View the SRB announcement.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced the reappointment of William C. Dudley and Michael Strine as president and first vice president of the New York Fed, respectively. Eligible members of the New York Fed’s board of directors voted unanimously to reappoint Mr. Dudley and Mr. Strine, and the Federal Reserve Board approved that decision. Their new five-year terms begin March 1, 2016.

View the New York Fed press release.    

US Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary Jo White addressed the annual “SEC Speaks” program, noting the critical role capital markets play in the US economy and the importance of risk-taking as part this process. White argued that regulators should not seek to eliminate risk altogether but rather safeguard the investment and capital raising process from unacceptable risks that dilute, distort or disable the fair playing field that is integral to robust free financial markets.

View the speech. 

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency jointly issued interim final rules that will allow certain well-capitalized and well‑managed insured depository institutions with less than $1 billion in total assets to qualify for an 18-month examination cycle, rather than a 12-month cycle. Institutions are considered to be well-capitalized and well-managed if they have a composite examination rating of 1 or 2—the top ratings in the five-point scale indicating the safety and soundness of a bank or savings association. 

The rules are estimated to increase the number of institutions that may qualify for an 18-month examination cycle by approximately 617, to nearly 5,000 insured depository institutions. In addition, the rules increase the number of US branches and agencies of foreign banks that may qualify for an 18-month examination cycle by 26 branches and agencies, to a total of 89. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory compliance costs for smaller institutions, while still maintaining safety and soundness protections. Comments to the rules will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

View the interim final rules and request for comments. 

The Prudential Regulation Authority published policy statement outlining approach to identifying other systematically important institutions (i.e. institutions that are not classed as globally systematically important financial institutions but whose failure would have a significant negative effect on the UK financial system). The PRA is required to identify O-SIIs pursuant to the Capital Requirements Directive which implements the framework for domestic systemically important institutions developed by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision.

Read More.

The Financial Conduct Authority published proposed guidance on the FCA's updated view on enforcing security under the Consumer Credit Act and when a default notice is required to be issued. The guidance is aimed at firms that provide consumer credit services and products. The proposed guidance invites comment on "what is enforcement" in the context of when a firm could breach the CCA. The proposed guidance relates to the requirement under the CCA to serve a default notice, following the breach of a regulated agreement, before taking certain enforcement actions. In a previous feedback statement published in September 2015, the FCA stated that a default notice was not required when taking or demanding payment from guarantors following a default because this was deemed to be enforcement of a security. This guidance provides the updated view that this statement made in the feedback statement was incorrect. The guidance provides specific circumstances where a default notice would be required in the context of guarantor loans. One such circumstance is where a creditor wishes to request or take payment from a guarantor following non-payment by a debtor. The FCA has taken the view that a creditor cannot take payment from the guarantor where it has failed to serve a valid default notice. Comments on the consultation may be submitted until March 18, 2016.

View the Proposed Guidance.

The European Central Bank launched a consultation on its proposed guide to the recognition of institutional protection schemes for prudential purposes. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation an IPS is a contractual or statutory liability arrangement of a group of banks which protects member institutions, in particular, by ensuring their liquidity and solvency. Certain waivers or relaxation of capital requirements are available for IPS member institutions under CRR.  In particular, CRR provides that the ECB may, subject to certain exceptions, allow credit institutions to apply a 0% risk weight to exposures to other counterparties whichare members of the same IPS. The ECB directly supervises the largest Eurozone banks for prudential purposes and overseas the prudential supervision by national regulators of the smaller Eurozone banks. The ECB's proposed guidelines set out how it intends to assess compliance of an IPS and its members with the requirements set out in the CRR. Responses to the consultation should be submitted by April 15, 2016. Once finalized, the final guidelines will be incorporated into the ECB Guide on options and discretions available in Union law (which is currently being finalized).
 
View the proposed guide.
 
View the ECB's consultation webpage.

The Financial Conduct Authority published the findings of its review into the research and due diligence processes that firms undertake on the products and services they recommend to retail clients. The FCA assessed 13 advisory firms and also visited seven external research and due diligence consultancy firms. Key findings that emerged from the thematic review were that most firms seek to achieve positive outcomes for their clients when undertaking research and due diligence and that there is some evidence of good practice. However, many firms do not demonstrate good practice consistently across all products and services. The FCA found that a corporate culture of challenge was a key driver of good research and due diligence. Those firms that did not have a corporate culture of challenge: (i) did not try to understand or challenge their own inappropriate bias towards products, services or providers; and (ii) inadequately managed conflicts of interest. The FCA has taken steps to address the issues found, instructing three firms to improve their research and due diligence process. The FCA has also asked one firm to complete a past business review. The FCA intends to provide firms with further communications that set out its expectations in this area in greater detail. In addition, the FCA's second consultation paper on implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, due to be published later this year, will cover requirements for research on products.

View the FCA's review report.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight issued a no-action letter providing time-limited relief for end users from the Form TO filing requirement under CFTC Regulation 32.3(b)(2), which the CFTC has proposed to amend.  The regulation currently requires counterparties to trade options that are not required to be reported to a swap data repository to submit a Form TO filing by March 1 following the end of any calendar year during which they entered into one or more unreported trade options. While the CFTC is considering the proposed amendment to the Trade Options Rule, DMO will not recommend that the CFTC take enforcement action against a market participant that is neither a swap dealer nor a major swap participant for failing to report its otherwise unreported trade options entered into during 2015 on Form TO by April 1, 2016.

View the CFTC press release.

View CFTC Staff Letter 16-10.  

View the CFTC regulation.  

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight and Office of Data and Technology staff extended the comment period on the draft technical specifications for certain prioritized swap data elements and associated questions to March 7, 2016.  The draft technical specifications include certain swap data elements that are reportable under Part 45 and related provisions of the CFTC’s regulations, as well as certain swap data elements that are not currently reportable under the CFTC’s regulations, but which have been identified as data elements that may assist the CFTC in fulfilling its regulatory mandates.  Specifically, the request for comment seeks public input on 80 questions addressing 120 data elements for various swap data reporting topics including counterparty-related elements, price, clearing, product, periodic reporting, orders, package transactions, options, additional fixed payments, notional amount, events, rates and foreign exchange. 

View the CFTC press release. 

View the draft technical specifications.    

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved the reappointment of 10 Federal Reserve Bank presidents and 10 first vice presidents by their respective boards of directors. Each individual has been approved to serve a new five-year term beginning March 1, 2016. The recently named presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Minneapolis and Dallas, as well as the recently appointed first vice presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia and Chicago, were approved for terms through February 28, 2021, at the time of their initial appointments.

View the list of presidents and first vice presidents, by Federal Reserve District.  

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued an interim final rule amending Regulation I to implement provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act. The FAST Act reduced the dividend rate applicable to certain Reserve Bank depository institution stockholders that have total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion to the lesser of (i) 6 percent or (ii) the most recent 10-year Treasury auction rate prior to the dividend payment. The dividend rate for other member banks remains at 6 percent. Typically, Reserve Banks pay dividends to member banks twice each year in June and December.

The interim final rule also adjusts the treatment of accrued dividends when a Reserve Bank issues or cancels capital stock owned by a large member bank. Comments to the interim final rule will be accepted for 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

View the Federal Reserve Board press release. 

View the interim final rule. 

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized a policy, first proposed in October 2014, establishing a process for companies to apply for a no-action letter from CFPB staff that would reduce regulatory uncertainty for a new product or service that offers the potential for significant consumer-friendly innovation. This letter would indicate that CFPB staff reviewed the company’s application and have no present intention to recommend enforcement or supervisory action with respect to the particular aspects of the company’s product under the specifically-identified provisions and applications of statutes or regulations that are the subject of the no-action letter.

The new policy was created as part of the CFPB’s Project Catalyst initiative, which was designed to encourage consumer-friendly developments in markets for consumer financial products and services. The CFPB views this initiative as an important aspect of fulfilling its mandate under the Dodd-Frank Act to provide all consumers access to fair, transparent, effective, and innovative markets. The policy also builds on a trial disclosure waiver policy issued by the CFPB in 2013, which allows financial services providers to take advantage of new technologies in designing and testing improved alternative federal consumer disclosures. 

View the CFPB press release.

View the policy. 

 

The Financial Conduct Authority issued a Call for Input on the retained provisions of the Consumer Credit Act. Responsibility for regulating consumer credit markets was transferred to the FCA in April 2014. The aim of the review is to simplify the regime and provide appropriate protection for consumers without burdening firms disproportionately. The FCA is seeking input on three key areas: (i) whether any specific retained provisions should be prioritized for review; (ii) the timeline of the review; and (iii) the manner in which the review should be undertaken. Responses to the Call for Input are due by May 18, 2016. The FCA is expected to establish a stakeholder's consultative group and to finalize the scope of the review in the next few months. The regulator will publish an update on progress in the fourth quarter of 2016. The FCA is required to report its recommendations to the Treasury by April 1, 2019. The report could outline legislative change and whether repealing any of the retained provisions in the CCA could have an adverse effect on the appropriate level of consumer protection. The report must also consider whether any of the retained provisions of the CCA could be replaced by FCA rules. In making the review the FCA must have regard to the principle that a burden imposed in relation to the carrying on of an activity should be proportionate to the benefits.

View the Call for Input.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System sent a letter to firms participating in the upcoming Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) and Comprehensive Capital Analysis Review (CCAR) notifying them of certain enhancements to aspects of its operational risk and capital models. Among the enhancements to operational risk models are losses from expenses related to put‑back mortgages, as well as potential costs form unfavorable litigation outcomes. For DFAST 2016, the Federal Reserve Board notes that it will use historically-based loss projections (with two new modifications) using an average of two models, while dropping the loss distribution approach. Changes to capital models include incorporating greater precision in the adjustments to the regulatory capital ratio denominators, as well as modifying assumptions regarding the relationship between mortgage servicing assets and associated deferred tax liabilities.

View the letter.    

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a proposal that would require certain insured depository institutions to maintain certain books and records in order to facilitate the payment of insured deposits to customers in the event such institutions were to fail. The proposed rule applies to insured depositary institutions with a large number of deposit accounts (more than 2 million). Based on current data, 36 insured depository institutions would be covered by the rule. The recordkeeping requirements would require the institutions covered by the rule to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor and would require such institutions to ensure that their information technology systems have the ability to calculate the amount of insured money for each depositor within 24 hours of a failure. Comments on the proposed rule must be received within 90 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register.

View the text of the FDIC proposed rule.

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the US Securities and Exchange Commission jointly issued a proposed rule to implement provisions for the orderly liquidation of covered brokers and dealers as required under Title II of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Specifically, Title II provides for federal receivership proceedings of qualifying financial companies, including covered broker-dealers, with the FDIC serving as receiver. The proposed rule defines a covered broker or dealer as any covered financial company that is registered with the SEC as a broker or dealer and is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. A covered financial company is generally one that is in danger of default and whose failure would have serious adverse effects on US financial stability, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. In the case of covered broker dealer, the FDIC will serve as receiver, but the SIPC will serve as trustee. 

Comments on the proposed rule must be received within 60 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register.

View the full text of the proposed rule.

A Commission Implementing Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, updating the list of third countries with equivalent regulatory arrangements in relation to prudential requirements for banks and investment firms for the purpose of the treatment of exposures. The Decision lists the countries whose arrangements for supervision and regulation of banks and investment firms are deemed by the European Commission to be equivalent to the standards of the EU as set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The assessments reviewed the supervisory and regulatory arrangements in each country for: (i) banks; (ii) investment firms; and (iii) exchanges. The following nations are now equivalent across all three categories: Australia, Brazil, China, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa and the United States. This Decision will enter into force on March 8, 2016.

View the list of equivalent third countries and territories.

The US Government Accountability Office released a report that examines the potential illicit uses of remittances and analyzes the benefits of requiring remittance senders to provide certain types of identification at a threshold below the current $3,000 level for US anti-money laundering efforts. Among other things, the report examines: (i) BSA remittance requirements for remittance providers and related challenges that remittance providers face in complying with these requirements; (ii) money laundering risks that remittances pose; and (iii) views of relevant stakeholders’ (including the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, regulators, remittance providers, law enforcement, and industry and other associations) on the extent to which requiring remittance providers to verify identification and collect information at a lower dollar transaction amount than is currently required, or adding a requirement to verify legal immigration status, would assist US federal agencies’ AML efforts.

View the report. 

In a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari argued that banks are still too big to fail and remain a significant, ongoing risk to the US economy. Kashkari noted that the Dodd-Frank Act did not go far enough and that regulators should consider breaking up large banks into smaller entities, turning them into public utilities by forcing them to hold higher levels of capital (as high as 25% of total assets), and taxing leverage throughout the financial system. According to Kashkari, the Minneapolis Fed will launch an initiative to consider transformational options through policy symposiums and policy briefs and create an actionable plan to end too big to fail that will be released by year-end for consideration by legislators, policymakers, and the public.

Kashkari’s predecessor at the Minneapolis Fed, Narayana Kocherlakota, responded to Kashkari’s proposals, noting that such measures, particularly imposing higher capital standards, would have “adverse macroeconomic consequences.”

View Kashkari’s speech.  

View Kocherlakota’s response.  

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a peer review report on the implementation by national regulators of the Committee of European Securities Regulators' Guidelines on a common definition of European Money Market Funds. The Guidelines specify a common definition of MMFs and establish a list of criteria that funds need to comply with should they wish to be categorized as a "Money Market Fund". The Guidelines aim to improve investor protection and apply both to: (i) collective investment undertakings subject to the Undertakings for the Collective Investment of Transferable Securities Directive; and (ii) non-harmonized collective investment undertakings regulated by the national laws of a Member State, which is supervised and complies with risk-spreading rules. The peer review follows the initial peer review published in April 2013 which identified that numerous regulators had at that time failed to implement the Guidelines. This second review updates the first review and covers 8 out of 30 countries which at the time of the previous review had not fully or in part implemented the guidelines. The 8 countries are Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta and Portugal. The review states that the guidelines are or are about to be fully applied in all these jurisdictions apart from Hungary, where some failings have been identified. 
 
View the Guidelines.
 
View the 2013 peer review report.
 
View the 2016 peer review report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a discussion paper on the proposed EU Benchmarks Regulation and its technical implementation. ESMA is seeking views on initial proposals it intends to make in the form of draft Regulatory Technical Standards and Technical Advice. This follows on from the European Commission's mandate sent to ESMA on February 11, 2016, requesting technical advice on potential delegated acts on the Benchmark Regulation. The areas on which ESMA is seeking views include: (i) the definition of benchmarks; (ii) what constitutes administering arrangements for determining a benchmark, taking into account different existing business practices; (iii) what constitutes the issuance of a financial instrument for the purposes of defining the use of a benchmark; (iv) the measurement for the nominal amount of financial instruments other than derivatives, the notional amount of derivatives and the net asset value of investment funds for a benchmark within a combination of benchmarks relating to the assessment of benchmarks; and (v) transparency requirements for benchmark methodology. The exact entry into force of the Benchmark Regulation is still unknown, though it is expected to enter into force in June 2016. ESMA has been asked to provide its technical advice four months after the Regulation enters into force. Currently, the Regulation and delegated acts are expected to apply 18 months after the Regulation enters into force. ESMA aims to analyze the responses to the discussion paper before July 2016 and to publish a consultation paper later this year. Comments on the discussion paper are due by March 31, 2016.

View the discussion paper.

The European Banking Authority published final draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes that the risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approach for securitization positions should be based, if applicable, on the credit quality of the positions. This credit quality is determined by reference to the credit ratings of CRAs. The draft ITS determine the mapping between credit ratings and credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights to External Credit Assessment Institutions' ratings issued on securitizations. The mapping is backed by the results of an impact analysis as well as quantitative considerations. A securitization-specific systematic mapping methodology is also being considered by the EBA and this would be based on the historical performance of securitization ratings. The ITS aim to enhance regulatory harmonization across the EU allowing credit ratings of all registered credit rating agencies to be used for calculating institutions’ capital requirements.
 
View the final draft ITS.

The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority jointly published a Policy Statement on the implementation of the Senior Manager and Certification Regimes, Senior Insurance Managers Regime and the requirements of the PRA on regulatory references. The Policy Statement, amongst other things, sets out a first set of PRA rules on the provision of regulatory references by firms under the SM&CR and SIMR, i.e., employment references passed between firms when an individual moves roles. These PRA rules are set out in Appendix 1 of the Policy Statement and will apply from March 7, 2016. The rules are largely a continuation of the existing requirements under the Approved Persons Regime and should be read and applied together with the FCA's equivalent requirements. The FCA's Policy Statement was published on February 4, 2016 and sets out the feedback received on the PRA and FCA's joint consultation on regulatory references. A second set of rules are expected to be published at a later date and will cover the areas on which feedback received by the PRA is still under consideration.
 
View the PRA and FCA's Policy Statement.
 
View the FCA's Policy Statement.

The European Banking Authority published its final Guidelines relating to cooperation agreements between Deposit Guarantee Schemes in accordance with the EU Deposit Schemes Directive. The Guidelines provide the minimum content for cooperation agreements between DGSs. The EBA has also provided a multilateral framework cooperation agreement in an attempt to minimize the need for numerous detailed bilateral agreements to be executed between multiple DGSs. The framework offers scope for DGSs to enter multilateral and bilateral agreements with more detailed terms than those provided for in the Guidelines, if necessary. The Guidelines stipulate minimum specifications to be included in cooperation agreements, including the means for: (i) repayment of depositors by the host DGS at branches of banks established in other Member States; (ii) the transfer of contributions from one DGS to another where a bank ceases to be a member of a DGS and joins another DGS; and (iii) mutual lending between DGSs. The EBA has attempted to cater for depositors in EU branches of firms headquartered in other Member States, so that they are treated in a similar fashion to depositors in home Member States by providing direction on the sequence and timing of events when the host DGS pays out depositors on behalf of the home DGS. The Guidelines will come into effect six months after their publication in all official EU languages.

View the Guidelines.

The Commission Implementing Regulation on the disclosure of leverage ratios by financial institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulation provides that firms must disclose relevant information concerning leverage ratios in the form of an approved template. Firms will be under an obligation to disclose a breakdown of the leverage ratio total exposure measure, a reconciliation of the leverage ratio for a firm's published financial statements and qualitative information on the risk of excessive leverage and the factors impacting the leverage ratio. The Regulation applies directly across the EU from February 16, 2016.

View the Regulation.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight provided no-action relief clarifying that the exemption from registration in Rule 3.10(c)(3) for persons located outside the United States who act as Introducing Brokers, Commodity Trading Advisors or Commodity Pool Operators on behalf of persons located outside of the United States is available in connection with swaps that are not submitted for clearing if such swaps are not subject to a CFTC clearing requirement.

View the CFTC no-action letter.
 

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued two revised booklets of the Comptroller’s Handbook: the “Country Risk Management” booklet and the “Installment Lending” booklet. Each revised booklet updates and replaces the previous versions of the respective booklets. The “Installment Lending” booklet provides updated guidance to examiners regarding the administration of installment lending practices and the controls and processes necessary to manage the risks associated with those practices as well as updated guidance for assessing the quantity of risk associated with installment lending activities.

The “Country Risk Management” booklet provides updated guidance to examiners regarding country risk management, based on lessons learned from the financial crisis of 2008 as well as the European banking and debt crises. The booklet also updates descriptions of the risks associated with international activities and contains a more detailed discussion of the effects of country risk, cross-border risk and sovereign risk on the OCC’s 8 risk categories (credit, interest rate, liquidity, price, operational, compliance, strategic, and reputation).

View the “Installment Lending” booklet.

View the “Country Risk Management” booklet. 

 

The Southwark Crown Court ordered Mr. Alex Hope and Mr. Raj Von Badlo to return around £2.9 million to investors who were defrauded by a collective scheme that Mr. Hope established and operated without regulatory authorization to do so. The Court made a confiscation order against Mr. Hope, pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, for an amount of £166,696. Mr. Hope's co-defendant, Mr. Von Badlo, was also subject to a confiscation order made at a hearing on December 18, 2015, in which he was ordered to pay £99,819. The Orders follow a prosecution by the Financial Conduct Authority.  The scheme, which was closed down by the FCA in April 2012, had a significant impact on over 100 investors. Mr. Hope had represented himself as a talented and skilful trader however he only actually traded around 12% of the total money his investors had given him and spent the majority of his investors' funds on himself. Mr. Hope was found guilty of fraud for operating an investment scheme without authorization in September 2015. Mr. Badlo pleaded guilty in July last year to recklessly making false representations to investors and promoting a collective investment scheme without authorization. Both individuals were sentenced to seven and two years’ imprisonment respectively in January 2015. Failure by Mr. Hope or Mr. Von Badlo to comply with the Court’s orders could result in their current prison sentences being extended.

View the FCA’s press release.

The European Commission published a joint statement following a meeting that took place on February 3, 2016 between the participants of the US-EU Financial Market Regulatory Dialogue. The group met to discuss key regulatory topics including recent developments in bank capital and liquidity measures, bank resolution, cross-border bank supervision, CCP resolution, derivatives reforms and benchmarks reforms. Amongst other things, US and EU participants outlined the progress made on: (i) the common approach on requirements for central clearing counterparties and the equivalence of US trading platforms under the EU Markets in Financial Instruments framework; (ii) the proposed European Benchmark reform; and (iii) resolution frameworks for CCPs. The participants included representatives from the European Commission, European Central Bank, US Treasury, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The next meeting will be taking place in Brussels in July 2016.
 
View the joint statement.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that, as part of the transfer of certain consumer protection rulewriting authority to the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under the Dodd–Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board was repealing Regulation AA (Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices). Among other things, Regulation AA contained the Federal Reserve Board’s “credit practices rule,” which prohibited banks from engaging in certain practices to enforce consumer credit obligations and from including these practices in consumer credit contracts. Separately, the Federal Reserve Board announced the proposal to repeal Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure), which has been superseded by CFPB rules.

View the Federal Reserve Board press release.

View the text of the final rule repealing Regulation AA.

View the text of the proposed rule to repeal Regulation C.
 

The European Commission asked the European Securities and Markets Authority for technical advice on potential delegated acts due under the proposed European Benchmark Regulation. The proposed Benchmark Regulation aims to ensure that benchmarks produced and used in the EU are robust, reliable, fit for purpose and free from manipulation. The Commission's mandate requests technical advice from ESMA on matters including: (i) what constitutes administering arrangements for determining a benchmark, taking into account different existing business practices; (ii) what constitutes the issuance of a financial instrument for the purposes of defining the use of a benchmark; and (iii) the conditions under which a national regulator may decide that there is an objective reason for the provision of a benchmark or family of benchmarks in a third country. In response to the Commission's request, ESMA published a discussion paper on the Regulation and its technical implementation. The proposed Regulation is expected to enter into force in June 2016. ESMA has been asked to provide its technical advice four months after the Regulation's entry into force. Currently, the Benchmark Regulation and delegated acts are expected to apply 18 months after the Regulation enters into force.
 
View the Commission's request for technical advice.
 
View the Commission's covering letter to ESMA.
 
View ESMA's discussion paper.

The Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority jointly published a consultation paper on how complaints about them are reported and responded to. The regulators operate a Complaints Scheme that investigates complaints against them. The scheme has recently been revised. The revisions require the Complaints Commissioner, which is the investigator of complaints against the regulators, to produce an annual report on such investigations and send a copy of the report to the regulators as well as the Treasury. If the Complaints Commissioner makes recommendations or criticisms about the handling of a complaint against a regulator, the regulator must respond to such recommendations or criticisms and send its response to both the Complaints Commissioner and Treasury. The Regulators are seeking views on the proposed revisions to the Complaints Scheme, following the legislative amendments. The regulators are also obliged to review the operation of the scheme after three years, which may lead to a further consultation in 2016. Responses to the consultation are due by March 8, 2016.
 
View the consultation paper.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules applicable to non-US firms engaging in cross-border security-based swap activities.  Under the final rules, a non-US company that arranges, negotiates or executes a security-based swap transaction in connection with its dealing activity using personnel located in a US branch or office must count that transaction when determining eligibility for the de minimis exception to the security-based swap dealer registration requirement. A non-US firm must include such transactions in its de minimis threshold calculation together with security-based swap transactions connected with its dealing activity where its counterparty is a US person. Compliance with the rules is not required until the latest of either 12 months following publication in the Federal Register or the “SBS Entity Counting Date,” as specified in the SEC’s SBS Entity Registration adopting release.

View the SEC press release. 

View the final rules. 

Janet Yellen, the Chair of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System submitted before Congress the Federal Reserve Board’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report. In her remarks, Chair Yellen discussed the current economic situation and outlook of the US economy since July 2015, including strong gains in the job market along with continued moderate expansion in economic activity. Chair Yellen further discussed monetary policy and emphasized that the Federal Open Market Committee continues to monitor the federal funds rate, but anticipates that economic conditions will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate.

VIew Chair Yellen’s testimony. 
 

The European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly announced the adoption of a common approach regarding requirements for transatlantic central clearing counterparties. The common approach is intended to resolve an impasse that had prevented recognition of US CCPs under EMIR. Under the common approach, the European Commission is expected to determine that CFTC regulation of central counterparties is equivalent to EU requirements, subject to certain conditions. The CFTC is also expected to propose a determination of comparability with respect to certain EU requirements in order to permit EU CCPs that are or seek to be registered as derivatives clearing organizations to comply with such EU requirements in lieu of US requirements. The CFTC staff also committed to streamlining the registration process for EU CCPs wishing to register with the CFTC. In statements, CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad and Commissioner Jonathan Hill applauded the adoption of the common approach as an important step toward stable and uniform regulation of the global derivatives market.

View the Shearman & Sterling publication on the common approach. 

View the statement of CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad regarding the common approach.

View the statement of Commissioner J. Christopher Giancarlo regarding the common approach. 
 

Stanley Fischer, the Vice Chairman of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System gave a speech at a conference sponsored by the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation discussing the function of the Federal Reserve as a lender of last resort in the United States. In his remarks, Vice Chairman Fischer noted that, despite recent developments that have placed limitations on the Federal Reserve’s actions as a lender of last resort, the Federal Reserve, when necessary and appropriate, has the authority to act as lender of last resort in several ways. Vice Chairman Fischer noted that the Federal Reserve retains the power to extend discount window loans, either to individual institutions or more generally in order to address broader financial stresses, to insured depository institutions, including commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions, or US branches and agencies of foreign banks.  Further, the Federal Reserve is also permitted, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, to lend to non-bank institutions through the use of broad-based facilities to provide liquidity to financial markets.

View the text of Vice Chairman Fischer's speech.
 

The European Commission and US Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced they had reached agreement on a common approach to requirements for central clearing counterparties. The Commission is expected to adopt an equivalence decision affirming that the CFTC requirements for US CCPs are equivalent to those under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. US CCPs recognised under EMIR will be able to continue to provide services in the EU whilst complying with CFTC requirements, although this will likely be subject to US CCP compliance with certain aspects of EU rules on collateral calculations.

Read more.

The European Commission proposed a one-year extension to the effective date of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation, collectively known as MiFID II. The proposal, if approved, would mean that national regulators would have an additional year to comply with MiFID II. The new effective date would be January 3, 2018 instead of January 3, 2017.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority issued a Call for Input on its approach to the current payment services regime further to the revised Payment Services Directive (known as PSD2) which is to be transposed into national law by January 2018. PSD2 will affect the way payments services providers (such as banks, building societies and money transmission firms) are regulated. The FCA expects to revise certain sections of its Handbook in light of the revised directive and is seeking views on whether any issues exist that should be addressed when the updates are made. Responses to the Call for Input are due by March 23, 2016.
 
View the Call for Input.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation released the economic scenarios for use by certain covered financial institutions in the 2016 stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act. Generally, those financial institutions with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion are required to conduct stress tests. The released scenarios include key variables that reflect economic activity, such as unemployment, exchange rates, prices, income, interest rates and other economic and financial factors. The FDIC coordinated with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, which released the scenarios in late January, in developing and distributing the scenarios. 

View FDIC stress test scenarios.
 

The European Banking Authority published its Opinion expressing its disagreement with certain of the European Commission's proposed amendments to the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the criteria for setting the Minimum Requirement for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL). MREL is the European equivalent of US TLAC. The EBA submitted the draft RTS to the Commission in July 2015. The Commission proposed a number of amendments in December 2015. The EBA disagrees on, amongst other things: (i) the removal of the reference to a minimum contribution to loss absorption and recapitalization of 8% of total liabilities and own funds; (ii) the removal of the test for downward adjustments to the recapitalization amount and peer group reference for systemic institutions; and (iii) the removal of the upper limit (48 months) on the transitional compliance period, instead making reference to a transitional period that is "as short as possible". The EBA has resubmitted a further revision of the draft RTS to the Commission as an Annex to the Opinion.
 
View the Opinion.