The OCC announced the appointment of Charles M. Steele as the agency’s Deputy Chief Counsel. Mr. Steele will supervise the Administrative and Internal Law, Community and Consumer Law, Enforcement and Compliance and Litigation divisions. He will also supervise the district counsel staffs in the OCC’s Southern District and Western District offices.

View the OCC press release.
 

The Secure Payments Task Force, a 160-member task force convened by the US Federal Reserve Board to advance the safety, security and resiliency of the national payment system, requested comments from payment system industry participants in connection with its efforts to enhance three priority areas: (i) payment identity management; (ii) data protection and (iii) information sharing related to payments risk and fraud. For each of these focus areas, working group members have been meeting to document the current environment, the attributes of a more effective environment, the desired outcomes in each area and the barriers to implementation of recommended solutions.

The Secure Payments Task Force has been working across payment industry segments to define challenges and develop potential solutions. An online survey has been created to gather comments on how the task force is addressing challenges related to the three focus areas. The goal is to help ensure that the solutions being pursued will meet industry needs.
The survey was open for comment through November 8, 2016.

View Informatin regarind the survey.

The US Federal Reserve Board announced the approval of fee schedules, effective January 3, 2017, for payment services the Federal Reserve Banks provide to depository institutions (priced services). The Monetary Control Act of 1980 requires that the Federal Reserve Board establish fees to recover the costs of providing priced services, including imputed costs, over the long run, to promote competition between the Reserve Banks and private-sector service providers.

The Reserve Banks project that they will recover 100 percent of their priced services costs in 2017. The Reserve Banks expect to fully recover actual and imputed expenses, including profit that would have been earned if a private business firm provided the services. Overall, the Reserve Banks estimate that the price changes will result in a 3.2 percent average price increase. In particular, the Reserve Banks estimate that the price changes will result in: (i) a 5.3 percent average price increase for FedACH® customers; (ii) a 3.3 percent average price increase for Fedwire® Funds customers; (iii) an 18 percent average price increase for Fedwire Securities Service customers; and (iv) an 8.1 percent average price increase for FedLine® customers. The fees will remain unchanged for the Reserve Banks’ National Settlement Service and check service. The 2017 fee schedule for each of the priced services is available on the Federal Reserve Banks’ financial services website at FRBservices.org.

View the Federal Register notice.
 

The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it had voted to affirm the countercyclical capital buffer at the current level of zero percent. The release notes that the CCyB is a macroprudential tool that can be used to raise capital requirements on internationally active banking organizations when such organizations are exposed to an elevated risk of above-normal future losses. In such circumstances, the CCyB would be available to help banking organizations absorb higher losses and to moderate credit supply fluctuations.

The Federal Reserve Board’s release noted that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the OCC were consulted before the Federal Reserve Board voted on this decision. Should the Federal Reserve Board in the future modify the CCyB amount, banking organizations would have twelve months before an increase becomes effective unless the Federal Reserve Board decides on an earlier effective date.

View the Federal Reserve Board press release.

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released a report highlighting market innovations with the potential for consumer benefits as part of its Project Catalyst, a collaborative effort for the CFPB to research and encourage new or emerging projects that are consumer-friendly. The CFPB highlighted how Project Catalyst has led to the regulator engaging with companies and entrepreneurs that are developing new financial products—the report highlighted how the placing of the CFPB’s “trial disclosure waiver” program and no-action letter policy under the auspices of Project Catalyst has led to the CFPB better supporting innovation.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published a report outlining its response to the Commission's call for advice, published on April 26, 2016, on the review of the large exposures framework laid down in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The Commission is considering whether to implement the agreed Basel Committee on Banking Supervision framework for measuring and controlling large exposures by modifying the CRR through a legislative proposal before the end of 2016. The EBA's Report analyzes the impact of aligning certain aspects of the large exposures framework pursuant to the CRR.

Read more.

Katharine Braddick was appointed Director General of Financial Services at HM Treasury. Ms. Braddick was previously Director for Financial Services (International and EU) at HM Treasury but has taken up her new post immediately. Ms. Braddick replaces Charles Roxborough who, in June of this year, was appointed Permanent Secretary to the Treasury.

The Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) Order 2016 was made. The Order amends secondary legislation as a result of updates to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 relating to disciplinary powers for the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority applying to the misconduct of individuals and the senior manager’s regime. The Order also amends FSMA secondary legislation which specifies a "qualifying EU provision" applied for the purposes of determining whether a person has been knowingly concerned in a contravention of a relevant requirement by an authorized person under the new section of FSMA relating to FCA and PRA powers. The Order will enter into force on November 21, 2016.

View the Order.

The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting requirements of the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities. The ITS set out the procedures and templates for the identification and transmission of information by resolution authorities to the EBA on the MREL that has been set for each firm. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive requires national resolution authorities to set individual levels of MREL for each firm. MREL is the EU equivalent of US Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). The consultation closes on November 21, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

CFPB Director Richard Cordray delivered a speech at Money 20/20, focused on how financial innovation can better serve consumers. Cordray noted that CFPB, as a new agency, feels an affinity towards innovators in finance. Cordray highlighted how FinTech companies and financial institutions are developing products that “cut across” regulatory frameworks and pledged that CFPB will continue to work with companies to encourage innovation, while ensuring laws are complied with—he cited enforcement actions CFPB has taken focused on deceptive conduct, while noting that the agency is not looking to punish actors for “raising novel issues” or questions that fall into “unforeseen cracks in regulatory framework.”

The majority of Cordray’s remarks focused on 2 points: (i) how innovation can facilitate access to financial markets and products to underserved populations and (ii) how technology can help consumers better manage their own finances. He noted that technology is giving customers who remain “locked out” of traditional banking system options beyond an all-cash economy. He also highlighted automatic or motivational tools that help encourage consumers to save and talked about various CFPB policies, including its no-action letter program that allows programs to hold promise for consumers but would be held back by regulatory uncertainty to proceed for a defined period. Cordray concluded that the interests the CFPB and FinTech firms are aligned at a deep level, as they both require a focus on service to consumers.

View Cordray's remarks.
 

The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it plans to begin collecting data on Treasury security secondary market transactions from banks. The Federal Reserve Board intends to negotiate with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority to potentially act as the collection agent for this data on behalf of the Federal Reserve Board. These plans are intended to complement a recent FINRA rule change, approved by the SEC, requiring broker-dealers to report secondary market transactions in Treasury securities. The release cited the Inter Agency Working Group’s report on the market events of October 15, 2014, as recommending enhanced data collection activities. The Federal Reserve Board intends to seek public comment on the proposal.

View Federal Reserve Board release.

The Financial Action Task Force published Guidance on correspondent banking services, which it has developed in collaboration with the Financial Stability Board. The Guidance is in response to increased concerns about so-called "de-risking", whereby financial institutions avoid, rather than manage, the risks associated with money laundering or terrorist financing by terminating business relations with entire regions or classes of customers. The FATF considers that de-risking is inconsistent with FATF Recommendations, that it has negatively impacted correspondent banking and that it may result in financial transactions being directed into less regulated areas which would reduce transparency and increase exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing risks.

Read more.

The Financial Action Task Force published Guidance to assist countries on the content required to comply with the obligation to criminalize terrorist financing. The Guidance builds on FATF Recommendation 5, which provides measures to assist countries in fulfilling their legal requirements under the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism 1999 and relevant United National Security Council Resolutions. The Guidance outlines various aspects that offenses relating to terrorist financing must cover when implemented by national legal systems. For example, a terrorist financing offense must cover all types of willful terrorist financing activity. The Guidance specifies that the requirement of willful conduct is largely based on the Terrorist Financing Convention and requires a mental element or mens rea, such that the conduct is deliberately committed with an unlawful intention. The Guidance also sets out the bases and rationale of the Convention and Resolutions to assist countries in the implementation of such requirements. The Guidance focuses on the specific elements of the Recommendation that have most commonly been identified as creating particular implementation challenges and provides examples of how such requirements have been implemented by differing legal systems.

View the Guidance.

View the FATF Recommendations.

William Dudley, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, delivered opening remarks at the New York Fed’s third conference on culture in the financial industry. Dudley opened by citing “pervasive” evidence that the financial services industry faces deep-seated cultural and ethical problems and an erosion of trustworthiness that impedes the ability of the industry to do its job. Dudley argued that a trustworthy financial industry would also be a more productive industry, avoiding spending time on reputational or legal problems and better attracting top talent.

Dudley also argued that incentive structures and accountability will do more to improve the culture of the industry than “statements of virtues,” citing the need for real consequences rather than aspirational ideals. He argued that firms need to assess their incentive regimes to be consistent with good conduct, and supervisors should monitor compensation to see if incentive structures must be changed. Dudley also noted the role of the public sector and new rules in overcoming collective action and first-mover problems. Dudley concluded by arguing that an effort to air previously silent issues and discuss what had not been discussed before could be an effective tool in reforming the culture of the financial industry.

View President Dudley’s remarks.

The European Banking Authority published an Opinion on the criteria for identifying investment firms to which the EU regulatory capital requirements legislation should apply. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate. It recommended that a separate prudential regime should be established for these investment firms. The Commission issued a second Call for Advice in June 2016, asking for advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published updated translations of its final Guidelines on the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation for persons receiving market soundings and on delayed disclosure of inside information. ESMA had published the translations on October 20, 2016 but due to a linguistic issue with the Polish version had to re-publish all of the translations. The substantive content of the Guidelines is unchanged. The publication of the translations triggers the application of the Guidelines and so the Guidelines will now apply from January 10, 2017 instead of December 20, 2016. ESMA consulted on the draft Guidelines in January 2016 and published final versions of the Guidelines in July 2016.

Read more.

The US Federal Reserve Board issued letters to two banks, granting relief from certain US risk committee requirements under Regulation YY in light of certain home country corporate governance requirements and practices of the banks involved. Regulation YY requires foreign banking organizations with combined US assets of more than $50 billion but US non-branch assets of less than $50 billion to establish a US risk committee as a committee of the global board of directors, on a standalone basis, or as a joint committee with its enterprise-wide risk committee. One member of the committee must not be an officer or employee of the company or its affiliates (or an immediate family member of a person who is an executive officer of the company or its affiliates).

Read more.

The US Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC jointly released an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comments on enhanced cybersecurity risk-management and resilience standards. The new rule would apply to any depository institution or holding company with consolidated assets of at least $50 billion, foreign banking organizations with total US assets of at least $50 billion and financial infrastructure companies and nonbank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board.

Read more
 

The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the International Organization of Securities Commissions published a joint consultative report on the harmonization of a second batch of key OTC derivatives data elements. The report is in response to the 2009 G20 agreement that all OTC derivatives contracts would be reported to trade repositories - part of the G20’s overall commitment to reforming the OTC derivatives markets to improve transparency, mitigate systemic risk and prevent market abuse. This consultation complements the consultation on Harmonization of key OTC derivatives data elements (other than UTI and UPI), published in September 2015 and other reports on the Harmonization of the Unique Product Identifier. The purpose of this consultation is to develop guidance for regulators on definitions for the second batch of critical data elements that are important for global consistency and the meaningful aggregation of trade repository OTC derivatives transactions data. The consultation seeks views on matters including: (i) proposed definitions of key data elements; (ii) whether the proposed definitions cover different market practices globally; (iii) whether any alternative approaches to those mentioned in the report would better achieve the stated objectives; and (iv) whether the consultative guidance is unambiguous. A consultation on the third batch of key data elements is expected in 2017. Responses to the proposals are due by November 30, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

View the consultative report on the first batch of OTC derivatives data elements. 

The European Commission published a report on reporting obligations under the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation. The Report reviewed references to external credit ratings in EU legislation and in private contracts among financial markets counterparties and outlines potential alternatives to credit ratings produced by credit rating agencies that are currently used by market participants across the EU. The alternatives examined include the use of market-based credit risk assessments, internal credit risk assessment tools and third-party credit risk assessments. The Commission concluded that there are currently no feasible alternatives to replace external credit ratings entirely. The Report reviews the credit ratings market and provides an assessment of provisions in the CRA Regulation aimed at increasing competition in the credit rating market. The Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of External Credit Assessment Institutions (published in the Official Journal of the European Union on October 12, 2016) is highlighted as promoting competition as it enables European banks and insurers to use smaller CRAs. The Commission commented that such mapping could create future opportunities for the use of smaller CRAs and possibly stimulate market development. The Report also examined the impact and effectiveness of the provisions in the CRA Regulation on governance and internal procedures; such as the prevention of conflicts of interests and alternative remuneration models. 

Read more.

The Financial Stability Board published methodology for assessing the implementation of the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for financial institutions in the banking sector. The methodology sets out the criteria to guide the assessment of a jurisdiction’s bank resolution framework and its compliance with the FSB’s Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions with the aim of promoting consistent assessments across jurisdictions. The Key Attributes were adopted in October 2011 and were endorsed as a new international standard for resolution regimes by the G20 Leaders at the Cannes Summit. They were supplemented in 2014 with new Annexes containing sector-specific guidance on, amongst other things, how the Key Attributes apply to insurers, financial market infrastructure and the protection of client assets in resolution. The Key Attributes apply to resolution regimes for any financial institution that could be viewed as systematically significant or critical in the event of failure. The Key Attributes also cover the resolution of financial groups and conglomerates; including holding companies of and non-regulated operational entities within a financial group or conglomerate. The Methodology would be used for the assessments performed by regulators of existing resolution regimes in their jurisdiction and any reforms to such regimes to implement the Key Attributes.  It can also be applied to peer reviews of resolution regimes conducted within the FSB framework to monitor implementation by member jurisdictions. Assessments should include, amongst other things, a summary view of whether the resolution regime has the necessary scope and reflects the Key Attributes. 

View the Methodology.

View the Key Attributes.

The UK Government announced that it would not be taking forward its plans to create a secondary market for consumers to sell their annuity income.  The market was to extend the recently introduced pension freedoms and flexibilities to individuals, who retired prior to April 2015. In December 2015, the Government announced that tax changes would come into effect from April 2017, which would allow individuals to receive all of the proceeds following the sale of an annuity as a taxable lump sum, arrange for the buyer to pay all of the proceeds into a flexi-access drawdown fund or arrange for the proceeds to be used to buy a new ‘flexible’ annuity. In April this year, the UK Government and the Financial Conduct Authority consulted on the proposed regulatory framework for the secondary annuities market. The UK Government’s view is that a balance between creating conditions for a competitive market with multiple buyers and sellers of annuities combined with sufficient consumer protections could not be achieved. 

View the press release. 

View the HM Treasury consultation.

View the FCA consultation. 

The Financial Conduct Authority published its final report on the investment and corporate banking market study. The focus of the study was on primary market activities in the UK, including equity capital markets, debt capital markets and merger and acquisition services. The FCA published its interim report in April 2016, consulting on its proposed remedies to the deficiencies identified. The FCA does not consider the feedback received an indication that there is any reason to change its interim findings. The FCA concludes that whilst there are a wide range of banks and advisers active in the provision of primary markets services and despite finding that a number of clients, in particular corporate clients, believe that they are well served by such providers, there are some practices undertaken by certain providers that could have a negative impact on competition, particularly for smaller clients. 

The FCA is proposing a ban on restrictive contractual clauses in investment and corporate banking engagement letters and contracts where the clause covers future corporate finance services carried out from a UK establishment. Some banks use clauses in agreements that oblige clients to award or offer future services to that same bank. The FCA considers the most restrictive of these the “right of first refusal” and “right to act” clauses - which the regulator proposes to prohibit. The FCA is proposing to exclude engagement letters relating to bridging loans from the prohibition; because the nature of this type of loan means that banks are unlikely to offer such a loan if it cannot confirm whether it would be instructed to provide the longer term financing. Responses to the consultation are due by December 16, 2017. The FCA aims to publish a policy statement early in 2017 and is proposing that the rules would also apply from early in 2017. 

Read more.

The UK's Competition & Markets Authority published proposals for the implementation of certain remedies to counter the adverse effects on competition which were identified in the CMA's final report on the retail banking market investigation. The CMA published its final report into the supply of retail banking services to personal current account customers and small and banking services to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the UK in August 2016. In that report, the CMA made several recommendations, including the introduction of Open Banking, a single digital application that allows customers to manage their accounts with multiple providers. In response to that recommendation, the nine providers identified in the CMA's report have made proposals for the structure, membership, governance and funding arrangements of the Implementation Entity. It is proposed, amongst other things, that the Implementation Entity's Steering Group would comprise the nine providers as well as representatives of FinTechs, smaller "challenger" banks and payment service providers. Andrew Pinder has already been appointed as Implementation Trustee and will oversee the work of the Implementation Entity. Comments on the Implementation Entity proposals should be provided to the CMA by October 21, 2016. 

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on the correction required for the calculation of Modified Duration for debt instruments subject to prepayment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes two methods to calculate capital requirements for general interest rate risk. The relevant methods are the Maturity-Based calculation and the Duration-Based calculation of general risk. The final Guidelines apply to the Duration-Based calculation. The Duration-Based calculation uses the concept of Modified Duration pursuant to the formulae outlined in the CRR. This method is only valid for instruments that are not subject to repayment risk. The EBA has is mandated to issue guidelines establishing how to correct the Modified Duration calculation to reflect prepayment risk. The EBA has proposed two approaches to correct the calculation. One option is to treat the debt instrument with prepayment risk as if it is a combination of a plain vanilla bond and an embedded option. The Modified Duration of the plain vanilla bond is therefore corrected with the change in value of the embedded option; which is estimated according to its theoretical delta, resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The other option is directly to calculate the change in value of the whole instrument subject to a repayment risk resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The Guidelines will apply from March 1, 2017.

View the final Guidelines.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published two sets of final Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies under the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities Directive and the Alternative Investment Funds Management Directive. The Guidelines follow ESMA’s final report that was published in March of this year.

The UCITS Sound Remuneration Guidelines will apply to management companies, including those that are subsidiaries of credit institutions subject to sector-specific remuneration principles, and investment companies that have not designated a management company authorized under the UCITS Directive. The Guidelines set out the obligations of the management company to manage its financial situation and the governance of remuneration (which includes issues such as the design, approval and oversight of the remuneration policy) and outline the requirements for establishing and applying remuneration policies and practices for management companies and their identified staff, specifying the categories of identified staff. 

Read more.

A Bill was introduced in the UK Parliament proposing amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and Terrorism Act 2000. The Bill forms part of the UK Government’s Action Plan to counter money laundering and the funding of terrorism. The Government launched a consultation in April this year on its proposals to overhaul the UK approach to AML and CTF. The Government’s Response to the initial consultation was published on the same day that the Bill was introduced. 

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the final Standard for Total Loss Absorbing Capacity holdings. The Financial Stability Board published the TLAC requirements for global systemically important banks in November 2015, which set a minimum requirement for TLAC for G-SIBs, including a Term Sheet implementing the requirements. The Term Sheet states that G-SIBs must deduct, from their own TLAC or regulatory capital, exposures to TLAC instruments and liabilities issued by other G-SIBs and calls on the Basel Committee to further specify these requirements. The Basel Committee consulted in November 2015 on the proposed treatment of TLAC holdings in G-SIBs. 

The TLAC holdings standard will require banks to deduct holdings of TLAC instruments that are not already included in regulatory capital from their own Tier 2 capital, subject to the thresholds that apply to existing holdings of regulatory capital and an additional 5 per cent threshold for non-regulatory-capital TLAC holdings only. In addition, instruments that are ranked at the same level as subordinated forms of TLAC must also be deducted. 

The TLAC holdings standard will apply to G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs from January 1, 2019 for investments in
most G-SIBs which is the same time that the TLAC requirements apply. The TLAC holdings standard will apply later for G-SIBs headquartered in emerging market economies. 

View the final Standard.

A Commission Implementing Regulation containing Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR permits the risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approaches for securitization positions to be determined, if applicable, based on the credit quality of the positions. This credit quality is determined by reference to credit ratings issued or endorsed by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation). The ITS determine the mapping between credit ratings and the credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights set out in the CRR for securitization positions. The ITS enter into force from November 1, 2016.

View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for securitizations.

A Commission Implementing Regulation containing the Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR requires the credit ratings scales used by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation) to be mapped to the risk weights categories in the CRR. 

The European Commission has adopted ITS that amended the final draft ITS submitted by the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority). This is despite the ESAs rejecting the Commission's proposed amendments in an Opinion published in May 2016. 

The ITS aim to ensure sound credit assessments to encourage financial stability in the EU and determine an objective approach for attributing risk weights to assessments carried out by ECAIs. 

View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for credit risk.

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit declared the structure of the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unconstitutional, stating that the “massive, unchecked power” exercised by its director, Richard Cordray, lacks necessary supervision and direction from the President of the United States. It also vacated a $109.2 million penalty against PHH Corp., a home mortgage loan provider, sending it back to the CFPB for further proceedings.

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation paper and discussion paper on the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions under the Basel III capital framework and related policy considerations. The International Accounting Standards Board and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board have adopted new provisioning standards that require the use of expected credit loss models rather than incurred loss models - the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 and the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL), respectively. These standards modify provisioning standards to incorporate forward-looking assessments in the estimation of credit loss. The new IASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2018, although earlier application is permitted. The new FASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2020 for certain banks that are public companies and from 2020 for all other banks, although early application by all banks is permitted from 2019. The Basel Committee is considering the implications of new ECL models for regulatory capital because the new models will result in fundamental changes to the provisioning practices of banks. The consultation paper sets out the current regulatory treatment of provisions as well as the Basel Committee’s proposal to retain, for an interim period, the current regulatory treatment of provisions under the standardized and the internal ratings-based approaches. In particular, the Committee is proposing that, in the interim period, jurisdictions would extend their existing approaches to categorizing provisions as general provisions (GP) and specific provisions (SP) to provisions measured under the applicable ECL accounting model.

Read more.

The G7 Cyber Expert Group published a statement on the fundamental elements of cyber security in the financial sector. The high-level elements are intended to assist a financial sector entity to design and implement their cyber security strategy and operating framework as well as to guide public authorities in developing their policies. The elements include the establishment of a cybersecurity strategy and operating framework, governance, risk and control assessments, monitoring, timely and proportionate responses to a cyber incident, the recovery of operations and remediation following a cyber security event, sharing information and reviewing the strategy and framework regularly to address relevant changes. The elements are not legally binding. 

View the elements of cyber security.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a Final Report providing its responses to the feedback on the proposed Guidelines on transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronization under the MiFID II package. The final Guidelines were also published. The MiFID II package, which comprises the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive as well as the related technical standards, imposes transaction reporting and order record keeping obligations on investment firms, approved reporting mechanisms, trading venues and systematic internalizers. The Guidelines focus on the preparation of transaction reports and order data records for various scenarios and aim to harmonize across Member States the approach to compliance with the MiFID II requirements. The Guidelines also include examples for reporting specific financial instruments with a focus on derivatives and provide further clarification on specific legislative provisions in the MiFID II package, on terms such as “reportable events” and “gateway-to-gateway latency”.  The Guidelines will apply from January 3, 2018 in line with the application date of the MiFID II package.

View ESMA's Final Report and final Guidelines.

The Bank of England published a consultation paper on the Bank’s proposals to reform the Sterling Overnight Index Average Interest Rate Benchmark, known as SONIA. The Bank of England, which took over as administrator of SONIA on April 25, 2016, notes that despite being viewed as critical for the sterling financial markets, SONIA is currently based on a market for brokered deposits which has limited transaction volumes. The consultation builds on the Bank’s earlier consultation in mid-2015, where it proposed that SONIA should capture a broader range of unsecured overnight deposits by including bilaterally negotiated transactions alongside brokered transactions. The Bank is seeking feedback on its proposals in four areas: (i) the SONIA calculation methodology: the Bank is proposing to switch the current calculation to measuring the average rate using a volume-weighted median, rather than a volume weighted mean; (ii) the definition of SONIA: the Bank is proposing to amend the definition of SONIA to reflect recent EU and IOSCO benchmark regulatory reforms and to account for international best practices for benchmark administration; (iii) transition planning: the Bank is working with market participants to transition from the current benchmark to the proposed reformed SONIA between October and December of 2017; and (iv) publication policies: the Bank is proposing to publish SONIA at 9:00 a.m. on the business day following the business to which the data pertains and to charge users who receive SONIA data on a timely basis directly from the Bank. Responses to the consultation are due by December 31, 2016. The Bank is expected to publish the final methodology for and definition of SONIA, the transition arrangements, and the publication and licensing arrangements in early 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The European Banking Authority published an updated Report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 instruments and standardized templates for AT1 instruments. This follows a consultation in July 2016. The Capital Requirements Regulation sets out the eligibility criteria for AT1 instruments, which are further detailed in Regulatory Technical Standards. The CRR requires the EBA to review the quality of own funds instruments issued by banks across the EU. The Report sets out the results of its monitoring the issuances of AT1 capital instruments, assessing the terms and conditions of selected issuances against the criteria provided for in CRR and the related RTS. The Report is based on the review of 33 AT1 issuances from EU banks, which took place between August 2013 and December 2015, for a total amount of EUR 35.5 billion. The Report sets out detailed analysis of some of the clauses reviewed, including the EBA's views on those clauses, and interpretation of some of the CRR provisions, in particular the provisions relating to triggers.  

Read more.

As part of remarks delivered at an Institute of International Finance panel on blockchain, US Federal Reserve Board Governor Lael Brainard addressed distributed ledger technology, noting that this technology may represent the most significant development in many years in payments, clearing and settlement. Brainard highlighted the payments system as an important area of oversight, noting that the FRB wants to maintain public confidence in the payments system, while supporting innovation that provides broadly shared benefits to the public over time, including through reduction of unnecessary frictions, costs and delays.

Among other things, Brainard discussed several use cases that the FRB explored in its discussions with industry stakeholders in order to illustrate the potential of distributed ledger technologies, as well as considerations important to the FRB in its assessment of benefits and risks. Regarding risk associated with the use of distributed ledgers, Brainard stated that, “[w]hat matters to us as policymakers and regulators is not only whether the migration to a new technological platform increases or reduces risks, but also whether risks are rendered more or less opaque, and how they are distributed among and between financial intermediaries and end users.”

Brainard noted that going forward, the FRB will deepen its engagement with a range of financial institutions and other stakeholders to refine its understanding of the new technologies, and will focus specifically on is responsibilities for the payments system, as well as its oversight of financial market intermediaries. The FRB expects to publish a research paper later this year that summarizes some key findings from its industry engagement on this topic thus far.

View Governor Brainard's remarks.

The Financial Action Task Force published a report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors updating them on the steps being taken by the FATF on implementation of international standards on transparency and beneficial ownership. In April 2016, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors requested the FATF and the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes to make initial recommendations by October 19, 2016 on ways to improve the implementation of the international standards on transparency, including on the availability of beneficial ownership information, and its international exchange. The report states that many countries still do not implement the beneficial ownership requirements effectively. Therefore, the FATF has committed to focus on beneficial ownership in the FATF peer review follow-up process, to deliver recommendations on how countries can improve their implementation of beneficial ownership requirements and to improve cooperation between the FATF and the Global Forum to improve transparency on beneficial ownership. The FATF will be considering the initial recommendations further at its meeting on October 19, 2016. The FATF is also calling on the G20 members to issue a public commitment to meet the FATF standards on beneficial ownership because, in the FATF's view, prevention of the abuse of corporate vehicles can only be remedied by individual countries. 

View the report on beneficial ownership. 

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission Division of Market Oversight (DMO) extended time-limited no-action relief to swap execution facilities from certain requirements in the definition of “block trade” in CFTC regulations. Specifically, CFTC regulation section 43.2 defines a “block trade” as, among other things, a publicly reportable swap transaction that “[o]ccurs away from the registered [SEF’s] or [DCM’s] trading system or platform and is executed pursuant to the registered [SEF’s] or [DCM’s] rules and procedures.”

Subject to certain conditions, the no-action letter extends time-limited relief to SEFs from the “occurs away” requirement under section 43.2 until November 15, 2017 before 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, or the effective date of any CFTC action with respect to the issues discussed in this no-action letter. Among other things, the extension will allow the DMO to continue to evaluate best practices and a more permanent solution to the issues involved in screening block trade orders for compliance with risk-based limits including, if appropriate, amendments to CFTC regulations.

Parties to a swap who do not use the SEF functionalities this letter provides must ensure the required pre-execution credit check occurs.

View CFTC staff letter.

The CFTC announced that CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad and Andrew Bailey, Chief Executive of the FCA, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding cooperation and the exchange of information in the supervision and oversight of certain regulated firms that operate on a cross-border basis in the United States and in the United Kingdom.

Through the MOU, the CFTC and FCA express their willingness to cooperate in the interest of fulfilling their regulatory mandates. The scope of the MOU includes the 20 firms registered with the CFTC as swap dealers.

View MOU.

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on the proposed Guidelines for the assessment of Information and Communication Technology risk under the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. The increasing complexity of ICT risk in the banking industry and the increasing potential adverse prudential impact such risks pose to individual firms and on the sector as a whole has led the EBA to propose the Guidelines. The purpose of the proposed Guidelines is to promote common procedures and methodologies for regulators throughout the EU when they are conducting supervisory assessments of a firm's governance and strategy on ICT and a firm's exposures and controls, as required by the Capital Requirements Directive. National regulators should apply the Guidelines to their assessment of firms proportionately, as set out in the EBA SREP guidelines. The proposed Guidelines should be read alongside the EBA SREP Guidelines. Responses to the consultation are due by January 6, 2017.          

View the draft Guidelines.

View the EBA SREP Guidelines. 

The UK Payment Systems Regulator published the final Guidance on its approach to monitoring compliance with the EU Interchange Fee Regulation. The final Guidance consolidates the previous final Guidance published in March 2016 on enforcing compliance of the provisions of the Regulation that came into force on December 9, 2015, with the latest Guidance relating to provisions that subsequently came into force on June 9, 2016. The PSR has also published a Policy Statement which summarizes the main responses to the PSR's latest draft Guidance. 

The Interchange Fee Regulation imposes caps on interchange fees on consumer debit and credit card transactions where the issuer and acquirer are both located in the EEA. The final Guidance applies to payment card schemes, issuing and acquiring payment service providers, processing entities, other technical service providers and merchants. 

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published draft Guidelines on trading halts by regulated markets under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. MiFID II requires regulated markets to temporarily halt or constrain trading if there is a significant price movement in a financial instrument (equity, equity-like and debt instruments) on that market or a related market in a short period. Regulated markets must also, in exceptional cases, cancel, vary or correct any transaction. ESMA is required to develop Guidelines on the calibration of those trading halts, taking into account the liquidity of the different asset classes and sub-classes, the nature of the market model and types of users. ESMA is also proposing Guidelines, at its own initiative, which set out how trading halts should be communicated to market participants and other venues and on the procedure and format of submissions by regulated markets to national regulators setting out the parameters for halting trading. The Guidelines will apply to national regulators, trading venues (regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs) and all trading systems allowing or enabling algorithmic trading. The consultation closes on December 6, 2016. ESMA intends to finalize the Guidelines in Q1 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The CFPB issued a final rule that applies federal consumer protections under Regulations E and Z for prepaid account users for the first time. Prepaid accounts may be loaded with funds by a consumer or by a third party, such as an employer. Consumers generally can use these accounts to make payments, store funds, withdraw cash at ATMs, receive direct deposits or send money to others.

Read more.

The OCC issued risk management guidance to national banks, federal savings associations and federal branches and agencies regarding the periodic reevaluation of risks in connection with providing correspondent banking accounts for foreign banks. The guidance provides a collection of best practices for banks to consider when undertaking such periodic reevaluations and when determining whether to retain or terminate certain accounts. Such practices include, among others, communicating these decisions to bank senior management with consideration given to potential international financial inclusion impacts, considering mitigating information obtained from foreign financial institutions and ensuring a clear audit trail of the reasons and method used for account closure.

The guidance restates the OCC’s supervisory expectation that banks assess risks associated with foreign correspondent banking as part of their on-going risk management and due diligence practices. As a general matter, decisions to retain or terminate banking relationships reside with the bank. The OCC does not direct banks to open, close or maintain individual accounts without regard to the risks presented by an individual customer or the bank’s ability to manage the risk.

View OCC guidance.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published draft Guidelines on the target market assessment for the new product governance requirements in the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The product governance requirements require firms which manufacture and distribute financial instruments and structured deposits to act in their clients’ best interests during all the stages of the life-cycle of products or services. The requirements in MiFID II were further specified in secondary legislation which was adopted by the European Commission in April 2016. ESMA's proposed Guidelines focus on the ‘target market assessment’, which has been identified as the most important for achieving consistent application of the product governance requirements across the EU. 

The proposed Guidelines set out, amongst other things, the determination of the potential target market by the manufacturer or distributor in terms of categories to be considered and differentiation on the basis of the nature of the product manufactured or distributed, regular reviews to assess whether products and services are reaching the target market and the distribution of products manufactured by entities not subject to the MiFID II product governance requirements by MiFID II distributor firms. ESMA has also included practical examples and case studies on the application of certain aspects of the proposed Guidelines. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017. ESMA will consider the feedback it receives and intends to publish a final report in Q1 or Q2 2017. 

View the consultation paper.

The European Securities and Markets Authoritypublished draft Guidelines on the requirements for the management body of market operators and Data Reporting Services Providers respectively. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive requires all members of the management body of any market operator to be of sufficiently good repute, possess sufficient knowledge, skills and experience to perform their duties, to commit sufficient time to perform their functions and to act with honesty, integrity and independence of mind. Market operators must also promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body. Similar requirements are placed on the management body of DRSPs but DRSPs are not required to promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body.

The proposed Guidelines will apply to the management body of market operators which are the individuals who operate a regulated exchange and to DRSPs. Investment firms operating a multilateral trading facility, an organized trading facility or banks operating a trading venue will not be subject to the proposed Guidelines. Instead the management bodies of operators of these other types of trading venues will be subject to separate Guidelines developed under other provisions of MiFID II and the Capital Requirements Directive which ESMA and the European Banking Authority are expected to consult on soon. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017. ESMA will consider the feedback it receives and intends to publish a final report in Q1 or Q2 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The US Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC posted the public portions of the required “targeted submissions” for eight systemically important US banking institutions. This follows the joint determination of the agencies in April of this year that each of the 2015 resolution plans of Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, JPMorgan Chase, State Street and Wells Fargo was not credible or would not facilitate an orderly resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code, the standard established in the Dodd-Frank Act. Accordingly, the agencies issued joint letters to these firms detailing the deficiencies in their plans and requisite actions to be taken by the firms to address them. The firms were given until October 1, 2016 to remediate their deficiencies and file a targeted submission to the agencies detailing the remediation. A firm that has not remediated the identified deficiencies may be subject to more stringent prudential requirements.

The agencies jointly identified weaknesses in the 2015 resolution plans of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup that the firms must address in their 2017 resolution plans. These firms were also required to file targeted submissions by the October 1st deadline.

View targeted submissions.

and.

Nearly 500 members of two national task forces convened by the US Federal Reserve Board began their review of nineteen proposals submitted by interested task force members across the payments industry that outline potential approaches for a faster payment system in the United States.

One task force is focused on faster payment capabilities, while the other is working to enhance payment system security. The review by the two task forces, each of which includes representatives of financial institutions, consumer groups, payment service providers, financial technology firms, businesses, government agencies and other interested parties, follows an independent analysis of the proposals by a global consulting firm, which assessed the proposals against 36 effectiveness criteria created by members of both task forces earlier this year.

A final two-part report is expected to result from the Faster Payments Task Force work effort. The first section, slated for release in January 2017, will describe the task force history and background. The report will detail gaps in the current payments landscape, identify opportunities for improvements and outline the benefits to the public of a faster payment system and the needs it would serve.

The second section of the final report, targeted for release in mid-year 2017, will include a discussion and assessment of the specific proposals, offering models of what an end-to-end faster payment system in the United States could look like and demonstrating how each proposal measured up against the various effectiveness criteria. This section will also identify strategic issues deemed important to the successful development of faster payments in the United States and recommend industry actions required to advance their implementation and adoption.

View Federal Reserve Board press release.

The European Commission adopted Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for uncleared OTC derivatives. The European Market Infrastructure Regulation requires counterparties to uncleared OTC derivative transactions to implement risk mitigation techniques to reduce counterparty credit risk. These RTS prescribe the regulatory margin amounts to be posted and collected and the methodologies by which the minimum amount of initial margin and variation margin should be calculated as well as outlining a broad list of securities eligible as collateral for the exchange of margins, such as sovereign securities, covered bonds, specific securitizations, corporate bonds, gold and equities.

The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities submitted final draft RTS to the Commission on March 8, 2016. The Joint Committee is made up of the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. On July 28, 2016, the European Commission requested the ESAs to amend the final draft RTS and submit a modified version for approval. The ESAs rejected many of the proposed amendments in an Opinion published on September 8, 2016, including certain amendments relating to concentration limits on initial margin for pensions scheme arrangements, the proposed amendments to the calculation of the threshold against non-netting jurisdictions, amendments relating to the treatment of covered bonds and the treatment of bilateral derivative contracts where a counterparty is a CCP, transactions with third country counterparties and the process for regulators on the exemption of intragroup derivative contracts.

Read more.