The UK Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement on the implementation of ring-fencing, covering prudential requirements, intragroup arrangements and the use of financial market infrastructures. The policy statement summarizes feedback received to the consultation paper published in October 2015. The PRA states that it does not consider that the responses received to the consultation paper have necessitated any significant changes to its proposals. 

Read more.

The US Federal Reserve Board extended until July 21, 2017, the conformance period for banking entities to divest ownership in certain legacy investment funds and terminate relationships with funds that are prohibited under section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule. This order formalizes the Federal Reserve Board’s December 2014 announcement that it would make this extension to provide for orderly divestitures and to prevent market disruptions.

This extension would permit banking entities additional time to divest or conform only “legacy covered fund” investments, such as prohibited investments in hedge funds and private equity funds that were made prior to December 31, 2013. This extension does not apply to investments in and relationships with a covered fund made on or after December 31, 2013, or to proprietary trading activities; banking entities were required to conform those activities to the final rule by July 21, 2015.

This is the final of the three one-year extensions that the Federal Reserve Board is authorized to grant. Additionally, upon the application of a banking entity, the Federal Reserve Board is permitted under section 619 to provide up to an additional five years to conform investments in certain illiquid funds, where the banking entity had a contractual commitment to invest in the fund as of May 1, 2010. The Federal Reserve Board expects to provide more information in the near term as to how it will address such applications.

View Federal Reserve Board order approving extension.

The CFTC Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight issued a staff advisory to remind futures commission merchants and introducing brokers of their compliance obligations to report suspicious activities to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. In addition, the staff advisory reminds all CFTC registrants of their compliance obligations regarding economic sanctions programs against countries and groups of individuals administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. The staff advisory provides a brief outline of the requirements of suspicious activity reporting and the requirements of OFAC.

View CFTC staff advisory.

A Commission Implementing Regulation setting out the Implementing Technical Standards on the provision of information to national resolution authorities for the purpose of developing resolution plans was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive provides that resolution authorities must prepare a resolution plan for each bank and empowers resolution authorities to require firms to provide information for that purpose. The ITS set out the procedure for the provision of that information, as well as the templates to be used which will capture the minimum set of information required, including, for example, organizational structure, critical counterparties and pledged collateral. 

The ITS entered into force on July 26, 2016.

View the ITS on provision of information for resolution plans.

The European Commission published proposed revisions to the EU Fourth Money Laundering Directive. The Commission is proposing to bring virtual currency exchange platforms and custodian wallet providers within the scope of 4MLD so that they would, among other things, be required to apply customer due diligence and establish place policies and procedures to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing. The Commission is also proposing to lower, from EUR 250 to EUR 150, the thresholds for non-reloadable pre-paid payment instruments to qualify for the exemption from customer due diligence requirements. It further proposes to require all EU member states to set up automated centralised mechanisms to enable swift identification of holders of bank and payment accounts and to harmonize the regime on enhanced customer due diligence for countries that have weak AML & CFT regimes. Public access to information on beneficial ownership of companies and trusts engaged in commercial activities is also proposed and Financial Intelligence Units are to be given greater powers to request information from entities that are subject to 4MLD. 
 

The Bank of England published its latest Financial Stability Report in which the Bank's Financial Policy Committee sets out the key risks to the UK's financial system and weighs them against the resilience of the system. In March 2016, the FPC had identified areas through which there could be increased risk to the UK's financial stability as a result of the vote by the UK public to leave the EU. Such areas include financing of the UK's large current account deficit, the commercial real estate market, the high level of household indebtedness, limited growth in the global economy and vulnerabilities in the functioning of the financial markets. The FPC states that there is evidence that some of these risks have begun to crystallize and that the current outlook for financial stability is challenging. The FPC is monitoring closely the risks of, amongst other things, further deterioration in investor appetite for UK assets, adjustments in commercial real estate markets tightening credit conditions and reduced and fragile liquidity in core financial markets.

To support the supply of credit and in support of market functioning, the FPC has reduced the UK countercyclical capital buffer rate from 0.5% to 0% of banks' UK exposures with immediate effect. This rate is expected to remain in effect until June 2017, and will reduce regulatory capital buffers by £5.7 billion. The FPC continues to monitor the risks closely.

View the report.

You may like to view our client publications and webinar materials on the impact of Brexit, available here.

The European Banking Authority published a comparative report on recovery plan governance and indicators. Banks and certain large investment firms are required by the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive to prepare recovery plans and to submit them to their national regulator. The national regulator must assess the credibility of the recovery plans. The BRRD requires firms to include appropriate conditions and procedures for the timely implementation of any recovery actions and a framework of indicators that identify the points at which certain recovery actions may be taken. The EBA compared the recovery plans of 26 European cross-border banking groups with parent firms located across 12 EU countries. The aim of the analysis is to assess how firms are implementing the requirements of the BRRD as well as draft technical standards on the content of recovery plans and EBA Guidelines on recovery indicators and to consider the credibility and effectiveness of governance arrangements across the sample banks. The EBA hopes that the analysis will assist regulators in their assessments of recovery plans, in particular, in identifying crucial elements to be considered by institutions when designing credible governance arrangements and effective indicator frameworks. 

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published its second report analyzing the level of asset encumbrance across EU banks. The analysis aims to assist EU supervisors in assessing how banks manage funding stress as well as the impact that switching from unsecured to secured funding might have on banks in conditions of stress. The report is based on data received for December 2014 and December 2015 further to a requirement under the Capital Requirements Regulation for banks to report levels of repurchase agreements, securities lending and all forms of asset encumbrance to national regulators and for the EBA to prepare annual reports based on that data. The analysis shows that there has been no significant increase in the overall weighted average encumbrance ratio over the last year. The report noted that high levels of asset encumbrance in some countries (notably Denmark and Sweden) were driven by large covered bond markets or by high central bank funding in countries affected by the sovereign debt crisis (e.g. Greece) or by high levels of repo financing and collateral requirements for OTC derivatives (e.g. UK and Belgium). 

View the report.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council approved revisions to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) that will take effect on September 30, 2016 and March 31, 2017. The revisions were proposed by the three US federal banking agencies in September 2015 (see FIL-39-2015, dated September 18, 2015), and included certain burden-reducing changes, a number of instructional clarifications and certain new and revised Call Report data items (e.g., a new item on “dually payable” deposits in foreign branches of US banks). After considering comments received on the proposal, FFIEC and the banking agencies are proceeding with most of the proposed reporting changes, with some modifications.

The Call Report revisions are part of an initiative launched by the FFIEC in December 2014 to identify potential opportunities to reduce burden associated with Call Report requirements for community banks, such as the costs arising from the Call Report preparation process.

View summary of the revisions.

The European Securities and Markets Authority submitted two amendments to the European Commission on the final draft regulatory technical standards on transaction reporting obligations under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The draft RTS were first submitted on September 25, 2015. The final draft RTS outlines transparency requirements for trading venues and investment firms in respect of shares, depositary receipts, exchange-traded funds, certificates and other financial instruments such as bonds and derivatives.

Read more.

A Commission Delegated Regulation in the form of Implementing Technical Standards on the means for appropriate public disclosure of inside information and for delaying the public disclosure of inside information was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Market Abuse Regulation requires an issuer to inform the public as soon as possible of information which directly concerns the issuer. An issuer may delay disclosing the information in certain circumstances, for example, if immediate disclosure is likely to prejudice the legitimate interests of the issuer. The ITS set out the technical means for issuers to publicly disclose inside information and the means for delaying the public disclosure of inside information. The ITS also requires an issuer bank or investment firm that wishes to delay disclosure of inside information to notify its regulator in writing to obtain the regulator's consent to the delay. The ITS applied from July 3, 2016.

View the RTS on Disclosing or Delaying Disclosure of Inside Information.

A Commission Delegated Regulation in the form of Implementing Technical Standards on the means for appropriate public disclosure of inside information and for delaying the public disclosure of inside information was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Market Abuse Regulation requires an issuer to inform the public as soon as possible of information which directly concerns the issuer. An issuer may delay disclosing the information in certain circumstances, for example, if immediate disclosure is likely to prejudice the legitimate interests of the issuer. The ITS set out the technical means for issuers to publicly disclose inside information and the means for delaying the public disclosure of inside information. The ITS also requires an issuer bank or investment firm that wishes to delay disclosure of inside information to notify its regulator in writing to obtain the regulator's consent to the delay. The ITS applied from July 3, 2016.

View the RTS on Disclosing or Delaying Disclosure of Inside Information.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published an Opinion, dated June 23, 2016, on a Denmark-based pension scheme that is to be exempted from the clearing obligation under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. The Opinion was requested by Finanstilsynet (the Danish financial supervisory authority) and relates to life insurer personal schemes. ESMA published a positive opinion for three other types of Danish pension schemes in April this year: life insurer occupational schemes, labor market related life insurer and multi employer pension fund. Transitional exemptions from the clearing obligation under EMIR can be granted to pension scheme arrangements that meet certain criteria, essentially, when OTC derivatives contracts are entered into and are used for hedging purposes. To obtain an exemption, requests must be made by the pension scheme to a national regulator. Under EMIR, the national regulator must then seek an Opinion from ESMA before making a final exemption decision. This follows the extension of the transitional exemption period from the clearing obligation for pension funds to August 16, 2017 which is the revised date by which pension funds must comply with the EU clearing obligation under EMIR.

View ESMA's Opinion.

The New York State Department of Financial Services issued its Transaction Monitoring and Filtering Program Requirements and Certifications final rule, which includes several notable departures from the proposal issued by DFS on December 1, 2015. The issuance of the final rule is another example of DFS enforcing anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements applicable to banks under US federal law. Like the proposed rule, the final rule requires covered institutions to maintain a transaction monitoring program for potential Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering violations and suspicious activity reporting, maintain a filtering program to prevent transactions prohibited by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and submit to the DFS annually a confirmation regarding compliance with the DFS’ transaction monitoring and filtering program requirements.

Perhaps most significantly, and apparently in recognition of serious concerns raised by the industry during the comment period, the final rule does not include the proposed “annual certification” by an institution’s chief compliance officer attesting to a covered institution’s compliance with the rule, nor does it include a reference to criminal penalties for filing an incorrect or false certification. Instead, the final rule requires an annual board resolution or senior officer compliance finding confirming that the covered institution is in compliance with the regulation “to the best of the [individual’s] knowledge.” The final rule also introduced “reasonably designed” standard into the transaction monitoring and filtering programs that institutions must establish.

View DFS final rule.

The US Federal Reserve Board released its annual determination of the aggregate consolidated liabilities of financial companies as required by section 622 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits a financial company from combining with another company if the resulting company’s liabilities would exceed 10 percent of the aggregate consolidated liabilities of all financial companies.

Financial companies subject to the limit include insured depository institutions, bank holding companies, savings and loan holding companies, foreign banking organizations, companies that control insured depository institutions and nonbank financial companies designated for Federal Reserve Board supervision by the FSOC.

As of July 1, 2016, aggregate consolidated liabilities equal $21,786,571,865,000, which is the average of the year-end financial sector liabilities of the preceding two years and will be the measure of aggregate consolidated liabilities for purposes of section 622 of the Dodd-Frank Act for the time period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

View Federal Reserve Board announcement.

The US FDIC finalized updates to its Frequently Asked Questions regarding identifying, accepting and reporting brokered deposits. In general, brokered deposits are treated less favorably than nonbrokered deposits for various supervisory purposes, including a prohibition on accepting such deposits if an insured depository institution’s capital falls below certain thresholds under the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) framework.

In November 2015, the FDIC released for comment proposed updates to the FAQs that were originally issued in January 2015. After consideration of the comments received, the agency retained a majority of the proposed updates, with certain clarifications and the addition of new FAQs.

The FAQs are based on the statute, regulation and explanations of the requirements for identifying and accepting brokered deposits provided to the industry through published advisory opinions and the FDIC’s Study on Core Deposits and Brokered Deposits issued in July 2011, as well as on comments received since publication of the FAQs. The FAQs provide plain language information about categorizing brokered deposits.

Key updates since the FAQs were issued in January 2015 address matters related to: (i) business professionals and deposit referral programs; (ii) deposits gathered through “dual hatted,” “dual” and “call center” employees (as explained in the FAQs) or contractors; (iii) deposits underlying government-sponsored prepaid or debit card programs; (iv) whether certain non-maturity deposits are brokered; and (v) actions an insured depository institution should take if it holds certain brokered deposits and falls below “well capitalized” for PCA purposes.

View updated FAQs.

The FICC Markets Standards Board published a draft standard for Reference Price Transactions for the fixed income markets. This is the first standard that the FMSB has published since it was established in June 2015 in response to the Fair and Effective Markets Review conducted by the HM Treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority. The FMSB’s objective is to improve conduct in the wholesale Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities markets. Feedback on the proposed standard was due by September 8, 2016. The standards serve as a supplement to applicable law, rules and regulation and seek to deal with traders’ conflicts of interests where hedging entered into by the liquidity provider could influence the reference price transaction. Once finalized, the standard will apply to all FMSB member firms (just over 30 firms to date) on a global basis. 

View the proposed standard.

EU legislation postponing the implementation date of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The MiFID II package will now formally not apply until January 3, 2018 instead of 2017. The postponement includes all of the technical standards and national laws although member states will need to transpose the requirements into national laws by July 3, 2017. In addition to the provisions delaying the implementation date, certain substantive amendments have also been made to the original texts of MiFID II. For example, Securities Financing Transactions, as defined in the new Securities Financing Transactions Regulation, will be excluded from the pre- and post-trade transparency obligations under MiFID II and there are revisions to specifically require the public disclosure of bid and offer prices for package orders.

Read more.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published final amendments to its rules on the contractual recognition of bail-in. The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive requires EU banks and certain investment firms to include clauses in certain contracts governed by non-EU law by which the creditor agrees to recognise that the liability may be bailed in by the national resolution authority. In November 2015, the PRA issued a Modification by Consent which disapplied the requirement for unsecured liabilities that are not debt securities (known as "phase 2 liabilities") where compliance would be impracticable until June 30, 2016. The PRA published its final rules and extended the Modification by Consent until July 31, 2016. The amended rules applied from August 1, 2016. The PRA also published a Supervisory Statement which provides guidance on the meaning of the term "impracticable" by providing a list of non-exhaustive examples of impracticability such as it is illegal in the third country to include contractual recognition language in agreements or instruments creating liabilities governed by the laws of that third country and the creation of liabilities is governed by international protocols which the firm has no power to amend. The onus will be on firms to demonstrate that compliance with the contractual recognition requirement would be impracticable.

View the amended rules, final Policy Statement and Supervisory Statement.

The European Commission published a report on the appropriateness of the inclusion of credit claims as collateral in the Financial Collateral Directive, including the appropriateness of the restriction on member states to require any formal act for the creation of or validity of such collateral unless the formal act was necessary for the purposes of perfection, priority, enforceability or admissibility in evidence against the debtor or third parties. The Commission assessed the laws that member states implemented across the EU and concluded that, although there is not full harmonization on implementation of the option, the option to include credit claims as collateral should not be removed from the Financial Collateral Directive without further work being undertaken to assess the related impacts. In addition, the Commission considers that action taken within the Capital Markets Union to remove barriers to cross-border clearing and settlement will likely improve the current uncertainty in cross-border exchange of collateral.

View the report.

The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it has not objected to the capital plans of 30 of the 33 bank holding companies participating in the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Federal Reserve Board objected to two firms’ plans and while one other firm’s plan was not objected to, it is being required to address certain weaknesses and resubmit its plan by the end of 2016.

CCAR evaluates the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of the largest US-based bank holding companies (including US BHC subsidiaries of non-US banking organizations), including the firms’ planned capital actions such as dividend payments and share buybacks and issuances. When considering a firm’s capital plan, the Federal Reserve Board analyzes, and may object to a capital plan based on, quantitative factors (e.g., a firm’s projected capital ratios under a hypothetical scenario of severe economic and financial market stress) and qualitative factors (e.g., the strength of the firm’s capital planning process, which incorporate the risk management, internal controls and governance practices that support the process). If the Federal Reserve Board objects to a capital plan, a firm may not make any capital distribution unless expressly authorized by the Federal Reserve Board.

Since the first round of stress tests led by the Federal Reserve Board in 2009, the common equity capital ratio, which compares high-quality capital to risk-weighted assets, of the 33 bank holding companies in the 2016 CCAR has more than doubled from 5.5 percent in the first quarter of 2009 to 12.2 percent in the first quarter of 2016. This reflects an increase of more than $700 billion in common equity capital to a total of $1.2 trillion during the same period.

View CCAR 2016 assessment framework and results.

The Bank for International Settlements' Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the International Organization of Securities Commissions published Guidance on cyber resilience for financial market infrastructures. The Guidance supplements the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures and aims to assist FMIs to improve their cyber resilience. The Guidance is not intended to impose additional standards on FMIs, but rather to provide FMIs with further detail on how they can enhance their cyber resilience capabilities and limit the increasing risks that cyber threats pose to financial stability. FMIs are expected to take a risk-based approach to implementing the Guidance and to act immediately to improve their cyber resilience, taking the Guidance into account. In particular, FMIs are expected to develop plans by June 2017 to improve their capability to meet the two-hour return to operations requirements.

View the Guidance on cyber resilience for financial market infrastructures.

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation proposing Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA aims to ensure harmonized and timely implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The proposed Guidelines will introduce specific guidance and formats for disclosure, using tables and templates. Responses to the consultation are due by September 29, 2016. The Guidelines are set to apply for year-end disclosures 2017. However, the EBA recommends that Globally Systemically Important Institutions implement a limited subset of disclosures relating to risk-weighted assets and capital requirements for the year-end 2016 disclosures.

View the consultation paper.

US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass), along with US Senator Mark Warner (D-Va), introduced a new derivatives regulation bill. The Derivatives Oversight and Taxpayer Protection Act proposes to strengthen federal oversight of the derivatives market and ensure that big financial firms, instead of taxpayers, will be held responsible for derivative losses.

If enacted, Senator Warren’s bill would greatly expand the regulatory capacities and powers of the CFTC. It proposes to provide the CFTC with a stable funding stream and allows the agency to impose penalties large enough to impact the bottom lines of even the largest financial firms. The bill also proposes to place certain cross-border and foreign exchange swaps under CFTC jurisdiction, changes how derivatives are treated in bankruptcy, requires posting of initial margin for inter-affiliate swaps, limits the use of netting in calculating risk-based capital and leverage limits relating to derivatives transactions and requires regulators to review derivatives clearinghouses.

View text of the bill.

The FSOC announced the rescission of its designation of GE Capital Global Holdings LLC (GE Capital) as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI). The FSOC unanimously decided that GE Capital no longer meets the standards for SIFI designation. Therefore, GE Capital will not be subject to enhanced prudential standards or supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

FSOC originally designated GE Capital as a SIFI in 2013 after identifying a number of key concerns, including the company’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding and its leading position in a number of funding markets. Since then, GE Capital made strategic changes to decrease its total assets by over 50%, reduce its interconnectedness with large financial institutions and have more stable funding. In order to become less systemically important, it has undergone a corporate reorganization, a series of divestitures and a transformation of its funding model.

View the public explanation of the basis for the FSOC’s rescission.

View FSOC press release.

An EU Regulation extending the exemption for commodity dealers from large exposures requirements and own fund requirements was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The exemption has been extended from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2020 or until a revised framework for the application of the Capital Requirements Regulation to commodity dealers and investment firms comes into force, whichever is the earlier. The European Council announced in March this year that it had agreed to the extension. 

Read more.

The final EU Regulation on Benchmarks was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Benchmark Regulation has been introduced in response to the numerous instances of benchmark manipulation that have emerged in recent years. In addition, the Benchmark Regulation is intended to harmonize across the EU the rules that have implemented the International Organization of Securities Commissions Principles for Financial Benchmarks and Principles for Oil Price Reporting Agencies. 

The Benchmark Regulation sets out the authorization and registration requirements for benchmark administrators, including third country entities, requirements for governance and control of administrators, provides for different categories of benchmarks depending on the risks involved and imposes additional requirements on benchmarks considered to be critical, powers of national regulators to mandate, under certain conditions, contributions to or the administration of a critical benchmark.

Read more.

The SEC proposed a rule that would require registered investment advisers to adopt and implement written business continuity and transition plans. The new rule requires investment advisers to prepare in advance for significant disruptions in their operations—whether temporary or permanent (such as a natural disaster, cyber-attack, technology failures, etc.)—thereby mitigating client and investor harm.

The proposed rule would require an adviser’s plan to be based on the particular risks associated with its operations, but also include policies and procedures addressing specified components, such as the maintenance of systems and protection of data, pre-arranged alternative physical locations, communication plans and review of third-party service providers. The rule would allow advisers to tailor the detail of their plans to the complexity of their business operations.

SEC Chair Mary Jo White commented that this rule was “the latest action in the Commission’s efforts to modernize and enhance regulatory safeguards for the asset management industry.” In addition to the proposed rule, the SEC staff issued related guidance addressing business continuity planning for registered investment companies, including oversight of operational capabilities of key fund service providers.

View the SEC press release.

View the proposed rule.

View SEC staff guidance.

The European Banking Authority published translations of its final Guidelines on sound remuneration policies. The final Guidelines are applicable to banks and investment firms and cover all staff with particular aspects focusing on staff whose professional activities have a material impact on a firm's risk profile. The Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2017 and will repeal the existing guidelines produced by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors in December 2010. The Guidelines set out detailed requirements for remuneration policies, the related governance arrangements and processes for implementing remuneration policies. 

View the Final Guidelines.

US Federal Reserve Board Governor Jerome Powell delivered remarks to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, highlighting the impact of Brexit on the outlook for the US economy.

Governor Powell voiced concern that the Brexit vote has the potential to create new headwinds for economies around the world, including the United States. He noted that while it may be “far too early to judge the effects of the Brexit vote,” it will be important to assess implications for the US economy, and for the stance of policy to foster continued progress towards the objectives of maximum employment and price stability in the United States.

Governor Powell noted that for some time, the principal risks to the US labor market recovery and economic growth have been from abroad. Due to the high and continuously appreciating trade-weighted value of the US dollar, the economy inevitably “imports” trading partners’ weak economic performances and financial volatility. Powell stated that to successfully contain the impact of the British referendum, the Federal Reserve Board is “prepared to provide dollar liquidity through existing swap lines” with central banks to address pressures in global funding markets. Powell also noted that while financial conditions have “tightened” since the Brexit vote, markets have continued to function in an “orderly” manner and the US financial markets remain resilient.

View Governor Powell’s speech.

The US Supreme Court elected not to review a Second Circuit decision that found debt purchased from a national bank by a non-national bank entity to be subject to state usury laws.

Read more.
 

The SEC voted to propose amendments that would increase the financial thresholds in the “smaller reporting company” definition. By expanding the number of companies that qualify as smaller reporting companies, the proposal is intended to “promote capital formation and reduce compliance costs for smaller companies” according to SEC Chairman Mary Jo White. Smaller reporting companies may qualify for scaled disclosures provided in Regulations S-K and Regulations S-X.

The proposed rules would enable a company with less than $250 million of public float to provide scaled disclosure as a smaller reporting company, as compared to the $75 million threshold under the current definition. If a company does not have a public float, it would be permitted to provide scaled disclosures if its annual revenues are less than $100 million, as compared to the current threshold of less than $50 million in annual revenues.

It is important to note, however, that the SEC is not proposing to increase the $75 million threshold in the “accelerated filer” definition. As a result, smaller reporting companies with $75 million or more of public float will be subject to accelerated filer requirements.

View SEC press release.

View the proposed rule.

The CFTC approved a final rule that amends existing swap reporting regulations to provide additional clarity to swap counterparties and registered entities regarding their reporting obligations for cleared swap transactions and to improve the efficiency of data collection and maintenance associated with the reporting of the swaps involved in cleared swap transactions.

The final rule removes uncertainty as to which counterparty to a swap is responsible for reporting creation and continuation data for each of the various components of a cleared swap transaction. For example, it clarifies whose obligation it is to report the extinguishment of a swap upon its acceptance by a derivatives clearing organization for clearing. The CFTC anticipates that the rule will have a number of other benefits, including a reduced likelihood of double counting notional exposures and an improved ability to trace the history of a cleared swap transaction from execution between the original counterparties to clearing novation. The rule was published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2016, and will become effective 180 days from the date of publication.

View Final Rule.

The US Federal Reserve Board released the results of supervisory stress tests for 33 participating BHCs, representing more than 80 percent of US domestic banking assets. According to the Federal Reserve Board, the largest US bank holding companies “continue to build their capital levels and improve their credit quality, strengthening their ability to lend to households and businesses during a severe recession.”

Under the most severe hypothetical scenario, the results project that loan losses at the 33 participating firms would total $385 billion during the nine quarters tested. This “severely adverse” scenario features a severe global recession with the domestic unemployment rate rising five percentage points, accompanied by a heightened period of financial stress and negative yields for short-term US Treasury securities. In addition to results under the severely adverse hypothetical scenario, the Federal Reserve Board also released results from the “adverse” scenario, which features a moderate recession and mild deflation in the United States. In this scenario, the average common equity tier 1 capital ratio of the 33 firms fell from an actual 12.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015 to a projected minimum level of 10.5 percent in the first quarter of 2018.

The Dodd-Frank Act supervisory stress tests are one component of the Federal Reserve Board’s analysis during the CCAR, which is an annual exercise to evaluate the capital planning processes and capital adequacy of large bank holding companies. This is the sixth round of stress tests led by the Federal Reserve Board since 2009 and the fourth round required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

View Supervisory Stress Test Methodology and Results.

The CFTC requested public comment on 34 submissions CFTC received in past several years from seven registered derivatives clearing organizations pursuant to section 2(h)(2)(B) of Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulation 39.5(b). Submissions cover certain interest rate swaps, credit default swaps, foreign exchange non-deliverable forwards, energy swaps, agricultural and inflation swaps. Public comments will inform CFTC as it considers whether to propose swap clearing requirement pursuant to section 2(h)(2)(D) of CEA.

In posting these submissions, CFTC is not proposing swap clearing requirement, as CFTC did most recently on June 9, 2016, regarding certain interest rate swaps. Submissions do not include swaps subject to this recent proposal or swaps currently required to be cleared under the CFTC’s existing clearing requirements. If CFTC decides to propose a clearing requirement determination for any of the swaps covered by the submissions posted on June 23, then, at that time, the CFTC will invite further public comment in response to a notice of proposed rulemaking, similar to the one published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2016 (81 Fed. Reg. 39506).

Comments may pertain specifically to a single submission or generally to several or all submissions. The CFTC is particularly interested in comments that provide data and analysis and discusses the swaps in terms of the five factors that CFTC is required to consider in determining whether to issue a clearing requirement determination under section 2(h)(2)(D) of the CEA. The comment period ended on July 25, 2016.

View CFTC press release.

US Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry delivered remarks as part of the US OCC’s Forum on Responsible Innovation, highlighting the OCC’s efforts to develop a framework for identifying and evaluating responsible innovation. Comptroller Curry defined a responsible innovation as one that meets the changing needs of consumers, businesses and communities, is consistent with sound risk management and aligns with the company’s business strategy. Within the context of a federal banking system, a responsible innovation is one that would help institutions achieve their public purpose without compromising their safety or soundness. During his remarks, Comptroller Curry made references to the OCC White Paper on responsible innovation that was released in March 2016.

In addition to Comptroller Curry’s remarks, the forum brought together thought leaders from banks, financial technology companies, academia, community and consumer groups and the OCC to discuss developments, opportunities and challenges related to financial innovation. The forum examined questions such as whether financial technology companies and banks could coexist and learn from one another and what the impact of innovation on consumers and communities may be.

View Comptroller Curry’s remarks.

The OCC announced that Beverly F. Cole will become its Deputy Comptroller for Compliance Supervision. In this new role, Ms. Cole will serve as the operational executive responsible for developing and promulgating compliance operational protocols, examination strategies and schedules. She will oversee a staff implementing bank supervision policy for compliance and establish programs to ensure efficient bank supervision for compliance. She will report to the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Compliance and Community Affairs. She took on these duties in July 2016.

View The OCC press release.

As part of his remarks at the Riksbank Macroprudential Conference in Stockholm, US Federal Reserve Board Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer responded to criticisms of the Dodd-Frank Act’s orderly liquidation authority and the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed total loss-absorbing capacity, or TLAC, requirement.

The proposed TLAC requirement mandates that systemically important firms maintain a minimum level of long-term, outstanding debt that could be used to absorb losses and recapitalize the firm in an orderly resolution under either the Bankruptcy Code or the orderly liquidation authority.

In his remarks, Fischer addressed the three most common criticisms of the TLAC proposal, starting with whether TLAC is a redundant backup OLA because the Bankruptcy Code provides an adequate framework for the resolution of any financial company. He also assessed whether OLA provides for a taxpayer bailout of systemically important funds through the orderly liquidation fund, concluding that it does not since OLA allows for liquidity support, and that any losses incurred by the fund would be covered by assessments imposed on large financial firms. Finally, he set forth reasons why TLAC requirements should not lead to GSIBs increasing their leverage and thereby their probability of failure.

View Vice Chairman Fischer’s speech.
 

The FSB launched a consultation on proposed Policy Recommendations to Address Structural Vulnerabilities from Asset Management Activities. The FSB recommendations aim to address four structural vulnerabilities from asset management activities that could cause financial stability risks. Those vulnerabilities are: (i) liquidity transformation by investment funds; (ii) leverage within funds; (iii) operational risk and challenges in transferring investment mandates in stressed conditions; and (iv) securities lending activities of asset managers and funds. The FSB makes 14 recommendations and seeks feedback on the proposals by September 21, 2016. The FSB intends to finalize the recommendations by the end of 2016.

View the consultation paper. 

The Banking Supervision arm of the European Central Bank published a Single Supervisory Mechanism supervisory statement on governance and risk appetite. In 2015, a thematic review was undertaken of all significant firms in the euro area to assess their management bodies and their risk appetite frameworks. The supervisory statement reports on the findings from that review, identifies good practices and sets out supervisory expectations for a bank's board and risk appetite framework, aiming to guide banks on their implementation of international best practices. 

View the supervisory statement.

The FDIC issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to remove and modify references to credit ratings with respect to permissible activities for certain foreign banking organizations, consistent with section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act and the FDIC’s authority under section 5(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Specifically, the proposed rule amends subparts A and B of the FDIC’s international banking regulations (12 C.F.R. Part 347). The proposed rule would delete references in Subpart A to nationally recognized statistical rating organization credit ratings in the definition of “investment grade” and replace such references with alternative standards for determining the creditworthiness of securities and other financial instruments. Subpart B would be amended in a similar fashion to eliminate references to credit ratings in respect of the eligibility criteria for assets that foreign banks may pledge in order to satisfy the FDIC’s asset pledge requirement. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due by August 29, 2016.

View FDIC notice of proposed rulemaking.

The FDIC released a final rule revising the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule (12 C.F.R. Part 360.6) to clarify that its requirement that servicers of securitized assets take loss mitigation action within 90 days after an asset becomes delinquent does not conflict with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Regulation X (12 C.F.R. Part 1024), which prohibits a mortgage loan servicer from initiating foreclosure notices or filings unless a mortgage loan is more than 120 days delinquent. Specifically, the Securitization Safe Harbor Rule is being revised to clarify that documents governing a securitization transaction need not require the servicer of securitized assets to take any action that would be prohibited by Regulation X in order to satisfy the 90-day loss mitigation requirement of the securitization safe harbor. The final rule is effective July 27, 2016.

View the FDIC final rule.

The US FDIC approved a final rule developed jointly by the FDIC, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, the Farm Credit Administration and the Federal Housing Finance Agency that, pursuant to Title III of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (TRIPRA), exempts certain non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps with certain financial and non-financial end users from initial and variation margin requirements required pursuant to Sections 731 and 765 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Specifically, the final rule exempts from the margin requirements certain swaps with counterparties that are commercial end users, certain captive finance affiliates, treasury affiliates, cooperatives and small financial institutions. The final rule is effective October 1, 2016.

View FDIC final rule.

As part of her remarks at the Managed Funds Association Forum, CFTC Commissioner Sharon Bowen outlined various proposals to improve governance in CFTC-regulated entities.

Commissioner Bowen emphasized maintaining independent, high-caliber boards of directors. She suggested that the boards of CFTC-regulated entities “craft qualitative and quantitative standards for directors” to ensure individuals meet expected fitness standards, “create a strong company ethos” to improve the culture of compliance and limit the tenure of independent audit and compensation committee members to protect director independence.

Commissioner Bowen also proposed swap execution facility reform, calling for the centralized oversight of SEF surveillance and enforcement functions. She proposed that “all SEFs should be under one self-regulatory organization . . . whether that is the NFA or some other SRO,” so as to increase the efficiency of enforcement mechanisms, standardize rules and increase transparency.

Finally, with regards to swap intermediaries, Commissioner Bowen stated that “the CFTC should also require registration and testing of all swap intermediaries.” Registration would allow the CFTC to obtain more information about those entities intermediating trades in the market, and assess whether their actions are appropriate. Moreover, having robust testing standards for swap intermediaries would serve as a quality control check.

View Commissioner Bowen’s remarks.

The FSOC released its 6th annual report to Congress. The FSOC reports annually to Congress on a range of issues, including significant financial market and regulatory developments, potential emerging threats to the financial stability of the United States and the activities of the FSOC. The report also makes recommendations to promote market discipline, maintain investor confidence and enhance the integrity, efficiency, competitiveness and stability of US financial markets.

This year, in particular, the report focused on cyber security, as well as risks associated with asset management products and activities, capital and liquidity, central counterparties and reforms of wholesale funding markets. The report also made recommendations about promoting market discipline, maintaining investor confidence and enhancing the competitiveness and efficiency of the US financial markets.

View the Report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published an updated document on its approach to waivers to certain pre-trade transparency requirements under the current Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. MiFID I allows national regulators to grant waivers to regulated markets and multilateral trading facilities from certain pre-trade transparency requirements for shares based on the market model or the type and size of orders. ESMA first published the document in August 2015, setting out examples of pre-trade waivers under MiFID I. The document is intended to assist national regulators in ensuring that their supervisory practices are in line with ESMA’s opinions and to assist firms by clarifying the content of the MiFID I requirements.

View ESMA's document.

US Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) sent a letter to the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC encouraging the agencies to use “all statutory tools at their disposal” if banks’ resolution plans, also known as living wills, are found not credible. The Senators expressed concern that, eight years after the financial crisis, and “after a multi-year review process, the living wills of five large banks reveal that the banks are still too vulnerable to weather a major economic storm without threatening the economy.” The Senators further noted that Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act provides the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC “the authority to impose more stringent prudential requirements on, or even ultimately restructure, large financial institutions unable to craft credible resolution plans on their own.”

Earlier this year, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly determined that five large financial institutions had submitted living wills that were not credible. The agencies have required those five firms to address the deficiencies and submit revised plans by October 1 of this year.

View the text of the letter.

The Federal Reserve Board, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the US National Credit Union Administration released a joint statement providing information about the new Financial Accounting Standards Board statement regarding credit loss estimation. The joint statement provides supervisory views regarding the recently introduced standard which introduces the current expected credit losses methodology for estimating credit losses. This standard applies to all banks, savings associations, credit unions and financial holding companies, regardless of their asset size. Early application is permitted for fiscal years after December 15, 2018, but the rule becomes effective in 2020 for public business entities that are US Securities and Exchange Commission filers, and in 2021 for public business entities that are not SEC-filers and private companies.
 

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its Opinion on the proposed requirements for Emission Allowance Market Participants to disclose inside information under the Market Abuse Regulation. ESMA's Opinion is in response to the European Commission's notification that it intended to endorse, subject to certain amendments, ESMA's Implementing Technical Standards on the public disclosure of inside information by issuers and EAMPs and on the means for delaying public disclosure of inside information. The European Commission is concerned that the ITS will lead to EAMPs being subject to duplicative disclosure requirements under the EU Regulation on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency, known as REMIT. The Commission's view is that the ITS should deem the REMIT disclosure requirements sufficient for the purposes of disclosure requirements under MAR, so as to avoid imposing duplicative requirements on EAMPs.

Read more.

An EU Delegated Regulation containing Regulatory Technical Standards on investment recommendations under the Market Abuse Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. MAR will apply from July 3, 2016 except for those concepts that will be introduced by the revised Market in Financial Instruments Directive and the Market in Financial Instruments Regulation, which will apply from 3 January 2018.

The RTS set out the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations and for disclosure of particular interests or conflicts of interest.  The RTS require that a firm producing a recommendation must disclose its identity, as well as the names and identities of the individuals involved in preparing a recommendation. Firms that disseminate recommendations will be subject to similar disclosure obligations and must also indicate on a recommendation the date on which it was first disseminated. Firms producing recommendations must also disclose relevant interests or conflicts of interest.

View the RTS on investment recommendations.