The draft Building Societies Act 1986 (Modifications) Order 2024 has been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The Order amends Parts 7 and 8 of the Building Societies Act 1986 to assimilate the law relating to building societies and to companies concerning directors' retirement and balance sheet signature following modification of the statutory provisions in force in relation to companies. The draft Order will amend: (i) sections 60 and 61 of the Building Societies Act to remove all references to the normal retirement age or the compulsory retirement age for directors, as stated in the 1986 Act. This will update the 1986 Act in line with the Companies Act 2006, where there are no longer corresponding restrictions for company directors; and (ii) section 80(1) of the 1986 Act so that the current requirement for the balance sheet of a building society to be signed by two directors and the CEO is changed to allow one director to sign the balance sheet on behalf of the board. This amendment aims to modernize the 1986 Act, aligning the provisions with section 414(1) of the Companies Act 2006. This would reduce a small but unnecessary burden for building societies, providing building societies with the equivalent accounts sign-off procedures as to companies. The draft Order will come into force 21 days after the day on which it is made.

The Building Societies Act 1986 (Amendment of Small Business Turnover Limit) Order 2024 has been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The Order amends section 7(10) and (11) of the Building Societies Act 1986 to increase the turnover limit in a relevant financial year for the definition of a small business in section 7(10) of the Act from £1 million to £6.5 million. It also makes a corresponding amendment to the reference to the equivalent limit in any other currency in subsection (11)(c). Under section 7(1) and (2) of the Building Societies Act, subject to some exclusions, building societies are required to raise at least 50 per cent of their funding from members' deposits; the rest can be raised from other sources, known as wholesale funding. Deposits by small businesses with a society, or any subsidiary undertaking of the society, are excluded from the wholesale funding limit by section 7(3)(aa). By amending the definition of a small business in section 7(10) of the Building Societies Act, the Order will exclude a larger range of deposits with building societies by small businesses from the funding limit, thereby providing building societies with greater flexibility in their funding sources. This amendment will also help building societies compete more effectively with ring-fenced retail banks for deposits from small businesses. The proposed new small business turnover limit of £6.5 million is already used to classify the smaller businesses whose deposits must be held within the ringfence. The Order comes into force on November 4, 2024.

The House of Commons has published a written statement by Tulip Siddiq, Economic Secretary to HM Treasury, on the status of reforms to the bank ring-fencing regime. Ms Siddiq states that the U.K. Government will implement a package of reforms as soon as parliamentary time allows. The reforms will aim to improve competition and competitiveness in the U.K. banking sector and support economic growth, while maintaining financial stability.

The reforms include:

• The introduction of a secondary threshold to exempt retail-focussed banking groups from the regime—where investment banking activity accounts for less than ten per cent of Tier 1 capital.
• New flexibilities to allow ring-fenced banks to operate globally, subject to the Prudential Regulation Authority's rules.
• Measures to encourage more investment by ring-fenced banks in U.K. SMEs.
• Measures to reduce the compliance burdens associated with the regime.
• An increase in the primary deposit threshold for ring-fenced banks, from £25bn to £35bn.

The Basel Committee on Banking Standards has published a progress report on the 2023 banking turmoil and liquidity risk. The report, requested by the G20 Brazilian Presidency, provides an update on the Basel Committee's analytical work on liquidity risk dynamics observed during the turmoil, building on the Committee's stocktake report published in October 2023. The report includes updated empirical analysis on a range of liquidity-related issues highlighted by the turmoil, including distressed banks' outflow rates, the materiality of different liquidity risk factors, and the role and use of supervisory monitoring tools. Drawing on the findings of this progress report, the Basel Committee plans to pursue a series of follow-up initiatives related to the turmoil, including: (i) prioritizing work to strengthen supervisory effectiveness and identify issues that could merit additional guidance at a global level; and (ii) pursuing additional follow-up analytical work based on empirical evidence to assess whether specific features of the Basel Framework, such as liquidity risk and interest rate risk in the banking book, performed as intended during the turmoil and assess the need to explore policy options over the medium term.

The U.K. Technology Working Group, supported by the Investment Association, published a report on the current and future usage of artificial intelligence in investment management. The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury are observers on the Group and supportive of the agenda. The report outlines common use cases of AI, examines enablers and barriers for longer-term AI adoption, and makes recommendations for future AI integration in the investment management industry. Key recommendations include:

• establishing regulatory clarity and consistency to enable developers and users of AI to plan and invest with confidence. This would include closer coordination between regulators and the further development of AI standards;
• building a U.K. fintech ecosystem with strong international connections that investment management firms can leverage to gain access to innovative solutions, specialized knowledge, and valuable insights;
• joint public and private sector action on AI-enabled fraud, to combat malicious actors and fight cybercrime and misinformation; and
• managing systemic risk through collective understanding and identifying best practices in risk management. The changing profile of systemic risk in the financial sector should not be a reason to hold back from innovating.

The draft Consumer Composite Investments (Designated Activities) Regulations 2024 have been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The Regulations establish a proposed new legislative framework for the regulation of Consumer Composite Investments, formerly Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products. They replace the following assimilated law relating to PRIIPs: (i) the PRIIPs Regulation; (ii) the PRIIPs Regulations 2017; (iii) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653; and (iv) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1904. The Regulations take into account feedback that HM Treasury received on the original version of the draft statutory instrument, which was published for technical comments in November 2023.

Read more.

The U.K. Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF) has published three guides to help the financial sector develop its approach to climate-related financial risks and opportunities. The CFRF is a financial services industry forum established jointly by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority and is comprised of senior representatives from across the financial services industry. The three guides are: (i) Nature-related Risk: Handbook for Financial Institutions - this provides an introduction for financial institutions to help frame nature as a risk, and discusses emerging practices in incorporating nature into financial risk management; (ii) Short-Term Scenarios - this discusses the use cases of short-term scenarios for banks/asset managers/insurers to provide more guidance to firms; and (iii) Mobilising Adaptation Finance to Build Resilience - this provides guidance for the industry to assess the physical risks they face and to facilitate increased levels of investment into climate adaptation to respond to those risks as an opportunity.

The Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services, and Capital Markets Union has launched a targeted consultation on the effectiveness of the EU securitization framework. Feedback gathered in preparation of the European Commission's report on the functioning of the Securitisation Regulation, and subsequent stakeholder engagement, indicates that issuance and investment barriers remain high in the securitization market, hindering the EU economy from fully reaping the benefits that securitization can offer. Originators and investors argue that issuance and investment barriers are partly driven by the conservativeness of specific aspects of the regulatory framework, such as transparency and due diligence requirements, as well as the capital and liquidity treatment of securitizations. The consultation seeks feedback on a range of issues impacting the EU securitization market, including: (i) the effectiveness of the securitization framework; (ii) the scope of application of the Securitisation Regulation; (iii) due diligence requirements; (iv) transparency requirements and the definition of public securitization; (v) supervision; (vi) the simple, transparent, and standardized standard; (vii) the securitization platform; and (viii) the prudential and liquidity treatment of securitization for banks. The deadline for comments is December 4, 2024.

The Council of the European Union has adopted the Listing Act legislative package, marking the final step in the decision-making process. The package consists of: (i) a regulation amending the Prospectus Regulation, Market Abuse Regulation, and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation; (ii) a directive amending the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and repealing the Listing Directive; and (iii) a directive on multiple vote shares. The regulation and directive amending MiFID and repealing the Listing Directive seek to streamline the rules applicable to companies going through a listing process or companies already listed on EU public markets. The aim is to simplify the process for companies, particularly SMEs, by alleviating administrative burdens and costs, while preserving a sufficient degree of transparency, investor protection, and market integrity. The multiple-vote shares directive creates a minimum harmonization at EU level that removes obstacles for the access of SMEs with multiple-vote structures to SME growth markets and any other multilateral trading facility open to trading of SME shares. The directive protects the rights of shareholders with fewer votes per share by introducing safeguards on how key decisions are taken at general meetings and also helps investors to take decisions by mandating transparency measures for companies with multiple-vote share structures.

Read more.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a Dear CEO Letter setting out its supervisory strategy for financial advisers and investment intermediaries. The FCA's priorities over the next two years are reducing and preventing serious harm to consumers who rely on financial advice, monitoring and testing higher industry standards under the Consumer Duty, and enabling more consumers to pursue their financial objectives through the Advice Guidance Boundary Review.

Read more.

The draft Securitisation (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2024 have been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. At present, U.K. investors in U.K.- or EU-origin Simple, Transparent, and Standardized securitizations can benefit from preferential prudential treatment due to a temporary arrangement. The time by which EU STS securitizations can enter the temporary arrangement will expire on December 31, 2024. This instrument extends the time by which such EU-origin STS securitizations can enter the temporary arrangement to June 30, 2026. The U.K. government is aiming to provide continuity and certainty to investors, until a non-time-limited assessment is undertaken. The explanatory memorandum explains that the three EEA-EFTA states will implement the EU Securitisation Regulation in their respective national legislation indicatively during 2025. It is preferable for the U.K. to undertake a single equivalence assessment at such a time when the EU and the three EEA-EFTA states have implemented the EU Securitisation Regulation uniformly, to reach a single assessment outcome for the EEA.

HM Treasury has published a policy statement on the treatment of overseas investment exchanges for the purposes of the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation. HM Treasury initially proposed to expand the definition of 'recognized exchanges' in the U.K. CRR to include those in the Recognized Overseas Investment Exchange regime and those detailed in the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority's technical standards that accompany the U.K. CRR definition. Following feedback that these proposals would be insufficient in restoring competitiveness with other jurisdictions (there are 30 exchanges in the ROIE regime compared to the EU's list of 108 exchanges), HM Treasury has amended its proposals. HM Treasury will add the link to the ROIE regime as initially proposed, but rather than refer to the PRA's technical standards, the CRR definition will refer to a set of conditions that will come to be specified in the PRA rulebook for the purpose of identifying recognized exchanges or assets traded on such exchanges. The PRA will therefore formulate new rules for the purposes of identifying recognized exchanges and intends to consult on these as soon as is practicable. Until the rules are made, qualifying exchanges will include those that are domestic U.K. investment exchanges and those in the ROIE regime, once the necessary legislation is made.

The draft Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (Retail Disclosure) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 have been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The Regulations make transitional amendments to the onshored Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products Regulation and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 (the MiFID Org Regulation), relating to cost disclosure requirements for U.K.-listed closed-ended funds (or "investment trusts"). The single aggregate costs figure currently being supplied to clients is not deemed to give an accurate representation of the actual cost of investment in shares in an investment trust. The draft Regulations therefore exclude investment trusts from the scope of the PRIIPs Regulation, meaning investment trusts (and anyone advising on or selling shares in them) will not be obliged to produce a Key Information Document. The draft Regulations also exclude costs of manufacturing and managing shares in a U.K.-listed investment trust from the aggregated cost disclosure requirements in the MiFID Org Regulation. The Regulations will come into force the day after the day on which they are made.

Read more.

The draft U.K. Prudential Regulation of Credit Institutions (Meaning of CRR Rules and Recognised Exchange) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 have been published, together with an explanatory memorandum. The purpose of the Regulations is to ensure that the revocation of the onshored Capital Requirements Regulation under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (which is yet to take effect) will not impact the U.K.'s approach to implementation of Basel 3.1, which has been delegated to the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority in accordance with the U.K. government's smarter regulatory framework. Regulation 2 amends the definition of "CRR rules" in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to include rules made by the PRA as part of Basel 3.1 implementation to replace CRR provisions revoked under FSMA 2023. This ensures that the FSMA 2000 accountability framework will continue to apply to the PRA's new rules. Regulation 3 makes a related amendment to section 5 of the Financial Services Act 2021 to ensure that certain requirements apply to those rules. Regulation 4 expands the definition of a "recognized exchange" in the CRR so that a wider range of instruments can benefit from preferential capital treatment. It does this by allowing overseas investment exchanges to be brought into the definition. This will include those exchanges on the Recognized Overseas Investment Exchanges register, and eventually it will also include exchanges where they meet conditions set by the PRA, which will be consulted on shortly. The instrument will enter into force the day after the day on which it is made. HM Treasury has published a separate policy statement on the treatment of overseas investment exchanges under CRR.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published its first annual report on EU carbon markets. The report delivers insights into the functioning of the EU Emissions Trading System market. Key findings highlighted by ESMA relate to:

• prices and volatility - the price of EU emission allowances declined in 2023, driven in part by lower demand for emission allowances from weak industrial activity, falling natural gas prices which led to a reduction in coal-based power generation and an increase in renewable energy, along with increased supply following the decision to auction additional allowances to finance the REPowerEU plan;
• auctions - the volume of emission allowances increased in 2023, and the primary emission allowance market remains considerably concentrated, with ten participants buying 90% of auctioned volumes in 2023, reflecting a preference by most EU ETS operators to source allowances from financial intermediaries; and
• trading and positions - the vast majority of emission allowance trading in secondary markets takes place through derivatives, reflecting the annual EU ETS compliance cycle where non-financial sector firms hold long positions (for compliance purposes) while banks and investment firms hold short positions.

The report concludes that no significant issue has been identified in the functioning of EU carbon markets. No major policy issues have been identified, although further analysis may be needed in the future as ESMA will continue to monitor carbon market developments.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a consultation on the review of regulatory technical standards on transaction data reporting and on order book data under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The proposed changes to the RTS stem from the MiFIR Review amendments. We discuss the overall MiFIR Review changes in our bulletin "MiFID II: the EU's latest adaptations". The deadline for comments is January 3, 2025. ESMA aims to publish a final report and submit the draft technical standards to the EC by the end of Q2 2025.

Read more.

HM Treasury has published a final draft version of the Payment Services (Amendment) Regulations 2024, enhancing efforts to address authorized push payment fraud. The draft Regulations amend regulation 86 of the Payment Services Regulations which require payment service providers to execute payment transactions within maximum time limits. The amendments give a payer's PSP the ability to delay the execution of certain payment orders where, within a specified time, provided the PSP establishes reasonable grounds to suspect the order has been made subsequent to fraud or dishonesty perpetrated by a third party (which may include the payee). The purpose of the delay is to enable the PSP to determine whether the order should be executed and must not exceed a specified time limit. Where the PSP exercises the ability to delay, the PSP will be liable for any charges or interest incurred by the payer resulting from the delay. The legislation is due to be laid before parliament shortly after the government's return from conference recess.

The Payment Systems Regulator has published a policy statement confirming the maximum level of Authorized Push Payment scam reimbursement. The statement follows the PSRs recent announcement confirming its decision to reduce the maximum level that payment service providers will have to reimburse victims of Faster Payments APP scams to £85,000 per claim, in line with the Financial Services Compensation Scheme limit. The statement provides an overview of the responses the PSR received to the consultation, sets out how the PSR has considered and weighed the responses and information received through the consultation in reaching its view and explains the reasons for its decision on the maximum level. The PSR explains that it will keep this level under review and consider it as part of its 12-month evaluation of the reimbursement policy. The Bank of England, as the operator of CHAPS, has also decided to set the maximum level for CHAPS APP scams to £85,000 per claim. The start date for the reimbursement policy is October 7, 2024, and the PSR reminds PSPs to continue the work already underway to prepare and ensure they are ready to implement the requirements.

The Bank of England has published the record of the Financial Policy Committee meeting on September 19, 2024. Headline judgements and policy actions from the meeting: (i) risks to U.K. financial stability are broadly unchanged since the June 2024, although significant financial market and global vulnerabilities remain; (ii) there was a significant spike in volatility across global financial markets in August. Although short-lived, the FPC notes that the extent of the moves, in response to relatively limited economic news, illustrates the potential for vulnerabilities in market-based finance to amplify shocks; (iii) the U.K. banking system remains in a strong position to support households and businesses, even if economic and financial conditions were substantially worse than expected.

The FPC decided to maintain the U.K. countercyclical capital buffer at its neutral rate of 2% and as part of its annual review of the leverage ratio Direction, the FPC confirmed that the U.K. leverage ratio framework remained appropriate. The FPC's next meeting will be on November 15, and the record will be published on November 29, 2024.

The Bank of England has published a joint press release with the Financial Conduct Authority and the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates (Working Group) on the end of LIBOR. On September 30, 2024, the remaining synthetic LIBOR settings were published for the last time. All 35 LIBOR settings have now permanently ceased and the Working Group has been wound down effective on October 1, 2024. Moving forward, market participants are encouraged to continue to ensure they use the most robust rates for the relevant currency, such as SONIA for GBP and SOFR for USD. Market participants should ensure their use of term risk-free reference rates, such as term SONIA and term SOFR, are limited and comply with the best practice guidance. Market participants are reminded that credit sensitive rates should not emerge as successor rates, because they are not robust or suitable for widespread use as a benchmark. In particular, USD credit sensitive rates have the potential to reintroduce many of the financial stability risks associated with LIBOR.

The United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative has published a 2024 progress report produced by the Net-Zero Banking Alliance. Launched in 2021, the NZBA is a bank-led alliance of 144 banks globally voluntarily committed to aligning their financing activities with routes to net zero emissions by 2050. The progress report summarizes information received from 122 member banks and offers insights into members' progress on target setting and transition planning. Overall, the report shows that most NZBA banks are taking significant steps towards meeting their climate goals. In the report, the NBZA identifies areas where more work is required, such as setting decarbonization targets for banks, which remains a challenging exercise due to the quality of client greenhouse gas emissions data, unclear decarbonization pathways, and a lack of a supportive policy environment. Insights gained from the progress will inform the steps NZBA will take to support emerging market banks that need more time to meet milestones. Following the vote earlier this year by member banks to reinforce and update the NZBA target setting guidelines, NZBA banks with significant capital markets activities are due to update their targets to include related emissions by November 2025.

The Bank of England and Financial Conduct Authority have published a joint policy statement providing feedback to responses received to the Digital Securities Sandbox joint consultation (CP24/5). We discussed the proposals in April in "UK Regulators Consult on Digital Securities Sandbox". The policy statement covers the following topics: (a) the approach to regulating DSS firms; (b) the scope of the DSS; (c) settlement of the payment leg; (d) operation of the DSS; (e) Gate 2 and end-state rules; (f) supervision of the DSS; and (g) other general issues relating to the DSS. Overall respondents welcomed the regulators proposals, with no respondents explicitly disagreeing with the creation of the DSS.

In response to feedback, the BoE and FCA have made some changes to their proposed approach and guidance, such as: (i) extending the scope of the DSS to include non-GDP (non-pound sterling) denominated assets; (ii) a more flexible approach to firm-specific limits at Gate 2, moving from fixed 'go-live' limits to a flexible range; and (iii) reducing the minimum capital requirement for a DSD from nine to six months of operating expenses.

Read more.

The Single Resolution Board has published a communication on the changes to its minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities policy to be implemented in line with the "Daisy Chains Directive" (Directive (EU) 2024/1174). That Directive amended the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. The changes brought in by the Daisy Chains Directive mean that from November 14, 2024, the SRB will not determine the MREL for liquidation entities unless it considers it justifiable to set an amount exceeding the amount sufficient to absorb losses. In addition, provisions of the Capital Requirements Regulation under which resolution authorities may allow, subject to certain conditions being met, institutions to reduce eligible liabilities instruments, will not apply to liquidation entities for which the SRB has not determined MREL. As a result, reporting and disclosure obligations do not apply to the liquidation entities for which the SRB does not determine MREL.

The SRB confirms that the previously adopted decisions setting MREL at the level equal to the loss absorption amount will be repealed with effect as of November 14, 2024. Furthermore, the prior permissions granted to the same liquidation entities under CRR and the related process set out in Delegated Regulation (EU) 241/20146 with validity beyond November 14, 2024 are repealed as of the same date. This means that relevant liquidation entities will no longer be limited by the prior permissions and will be in the position to reduce eligible liabilities instruments without the SRB's prior permission.

The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group has published the amended version to Part II Sector 18 (wholesale markets) of its AML/CTF guidance for the financial services sector. Changes to the guidance include: (i) a new section relating to customer due diligence on authorized personnel acting on behalf of the customer. It includes a clarification that the identities of internal personnel who are authorized to sign contractual documents may be collected by a firm for AML/CTF purposes on a risk-based approach; and (ii) a new section on wholesale subscription finance in private capital funds. The revisions have been submitted to HM Treasury for Ministerial approval.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has announced the next steps for the selection of Consolidated Tape Providers for bonds, shares and ETFs. ESMA will launch the selection procedure for the CTP for bonds on Friday January 3, 2025, intending to adopt a reasoned decision on the selected applicant within six months of the launch, i.e. by early July 2025. In June 2025, ESMA will launch the selection procedure for the CTP for shares and ETFs with the objective to adopt a reasoned decision on the selected applicant by the end of 2025.

ESMA explains that each selection procedure will be launched with the publication of a contract notice and procurement documents on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal. Prospective applicants are invited to register and familiarize themselves with the Portal. In the coming weeks, ESMA intends to share additional guidance on the assessment of exclusion criteria. ESMA will be available to answer questions throughout the application periods, ESMA also confirms that applicants will be granted as much time as possible, within the boundaries of EU procurement rules, to provide details on their projects. ESMA states that it will publish in December the feedback statement to its proposed technical standards on CTPs and the assessment criteria for the CTP selection procedure. We discussed ESMA's draft technical standards in "European Securities and Markets Authority Proposes Draft Technical Standards for Consolidated Tape Providers".

The Financial Conduct Authority has updated its statement on forbearance in relation to investment trust disclosure requirements under the U.K.'s current Packaged Retail and Insurance-Based Investment Products Regulation. The Government announced earlier in September its intention to exempt listed investment trusts from the PRIIPs Regulation along with a statement on reforms to the U.K. retail disclosure regime through the introduction of Consumer Composite Investments regime. At the same time, the FCA announced it would immediately apply forbearance until the legislation takes effect. We discussed the earlier announcements by HM Treasury and the FCA in "UK Announces Final Reforms to Financial Services Retail Disclosure Requirements".

The updated forbearance statement provides great clarity on the implication of the forbearance as regards compliance by firms with other rules and regulations, including the Consumer Duty and communicating to consumers. The FCA confirms that the forbearance applies along the distribution chain to any firm carrying on business relating to the relevant investment trusts, including manufacturing, distribution or marketing. The FCA states that firms across the distribution chain will need to consider what approach will deliver good outcomes for their retail clients, including the product information needed to support retail investors.

The FCA expects firms in the distribution chain for securities issued by investment trusts to work together to determine and share the required information to enable the continued distribution of these products, in compliance with their more general obligations towards retail investors, in particular under the Consumer Duty.

The U.K. Accelerated Settlement Taskforce Technical Group has published a draft recommendation report and consultation. The Taskforce was established to examine the case for the securities settlement cycle to be shortened from its current standard of Trade Date plus 2 days, or 'T+2', to Trade Date plus 1 day or 'T+1'. The Taskforce's initial recommendation was that the U.K. should move to T+1 by the end of 2027, which was accepted by the previous government who asked the newly established Technical Group to make recommendations by the end of 2024 on implementing the move. We discuss that recommendation in "UK To Move to T+1 Settlement by Latest End 2027".

The Technical Group's draft report sets out a number of draft recommendations. The main recommendation, referred to as recommendation zero, looks at the scope of instruments that will be covered by the implementation of T+1. There are two scenarios: (a) the U.K. migrates ahead of the EU/Switzerland. In this scenario, some instruments such as ETPs and Eurobonds will be exempted pending a subsequent transition to T+1 of the EU and/or Switzerland; or (b) the U.K., EU and Switzerland migrate to T+1 together, in which case it would be a straight transfer of all instruments currently covered today Central Securities Depositories Regulation.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a new webpage on the repeal and replacement of assimilated law. The new webpage predominantly reproduces the FCA webpage on the replacement of retained EU law originally published in July 2023. The timings for the FCA's work on the following files has been updated:

Consumer Composite Investments
The FCA plans to publish a consultation paper in H2 and a policy statement in H1 2025.

Long Term Investment Funds
The FCA will review responses to its consultation on removing references to LTIF from the Handbook, aiming to implement any changes in Q4.

MiFID II Directive, U.K. MiFIR and Wholesale Market Review reforms
The FCA aims to start a tender process later in 2024 to appoint a single consolidated tape provider for bonds and will update on an equities tape before the end of the year. The FCA will also publish a policy statement on commodity derivatives and a discussion paper on transaction reporting in Q4, followed by a consultation paper in H1 2025. The FCA also plans to publish a consultation paper on the MiFID Organisation Regulation in Q4.

Read more.

The U.K. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero published an update in relation to an extension of the U.K. Emissions Trading Scheme's first free allocation period. The U.K. ETS Authority is consulting operators in the scheme on a proposal to move the start of the second allocation period from 2026 to 2027, extending the current allocation period to include 2026. Operators will receive the consultation from their scheme regulator and have until October 11, 2024 to submit responses. The change aims to align changes to free allocation with the introduction of the U.K. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in 2027. The Authority received a significant number of responses to the Free Allocation Review consultation indicating a preference for this alignment to ensure a consistent approach to carbon leakage mitigation. The Authority will ensure that any changes made to free allocation rules under the Free Allocation Review will be published by the end of 2025, with implementation in 2027.

The European Central Bank has published a paper outlining how the European framework for threat intelligence-based ethical red teaming, the TIBER-EU framework, can help competent authorities and financial entities fulfil their threat-led penetration testing requirements under the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act. TIBER-EU is a common European framework that delivers a controlled, bespoke and intelligence-led red team test of financial entities' critical live production systems. It was established as a tool for testing and improving key elements of the cyber resilience of participating financial entities, while focusing heavily on the learning opportunities provided by the testing. The ECB suggests that guiding and performing threat-led penetration testing on the basis of the DORA regulatory technical standards alone will be challenging given the high standards required by such tests but that TIBER-EU will alleviate these difficulties to a large extent and provides a framework that can be used to fulfil the DORA threat-led penetration testing requirements. The paper considers the benefits of the TIBER-EU framework for authorities and financial entities subject to DORA.

The U.K. Payment Systems Regulator has confirmed that the maximum reimbursement limit for victims of Faster Payments Authorized Push Payment scams will be £85,000. The PSR began consulting on reducing the reimbursement limit earlier in September. The PSR will publish a final policy statement to explain the reasoning for the decision next week. The Bank of England, as the operator of CHAPS, has also decided that the maximum reimbursement for CHAPS will be £85,000. In making this decision, the BoE has given weight to the benefits to industry and consumers of having consistency of limits across the two payment systems. The BoE is committed to reviewing this limit within 12 months.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a consultation on proposals to address weaknesses in the safeguarding regime for payments and e-money firms. The FCA explains that there remain poor practices across the industry due to poor implementation of the regulatory framework. For firms that became insolvent between Q1 2018 and Q2 2023, there was an average shortfall of 65% in funds owed to clients (difference between funds owed and funds safeguarded). In developing the safeguarding proposals, the FCA has adapted the approaches in the existing CASS rules to reflect payment services.

Read more.

The Bank of England has announced the establishment of an Artificial Intelligence consortium. Its purpose is to provide a platform for public-private engagement to gather input from stakeholders on the capabilities, development, deployment and use of AI in U.K. financial services. Its specific aims are:

• to identify how AI is or could be used in financial services, for example, by considering new capabilities, deployments and use cases as well as technical developments where relevant;
• to discuss the benefits, risks and challenges arising from the use of AI. Such benefits, risks and challenges may be with respect to financial services firms or with respect to the wider financial system; and
• to inform the BoE's approach to addressing risks and challenges, and promoting the safe adoption of AI.

Membership of the consortium is at the BoE's invitation following a selection process. A consortium membership call for interest explains that applications to join the consortium can be submitted until November 8, 2024.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a speech by Therese Chambers, FCA Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, on the FCA's evolving approach to enforcement.

The FCA is adapting its approach to enforcement to meet evolving threats and maximise the deterrent effect. It has more than doubled its trading data coverage to around 1 billion records per day, and its systems can interrogate data across multiple asset classes quickly. The Cyber Forensics Unit is equipped with the latest technology and expertise to handle complex digital forensic tasks, and the FCA is improving those capabilities all the time. Going forwards, the FCA's approach will be ever more data and technology driven, and Ms Chambers strongly encourages firms to collaborate with the FCA in this.

Read more.

The U.K. Payment Systems Regulator has published a policy statement and draft guidance to support payment service providers in assessing whether an authorized push payment scam claim raised by a consumer is not reimbursable under the Faster Payments Scheme and CHAPS reimbursement rules because it is a private civil dispute. By private civil dispute the rules mean a dispute between a consumer and payee which is a private matter between them for resolution in the civil courts, rather than involving criminal fraud or dishonesty. The guidance sets out five high-level factors that PSPs should consider when determining whether a claim is a reimbursable APP scam or a civil dispute.

PSPs should consider all high-level factors and the information provided by the consumer or third party when assessing a claim. Changes to the draft guidance as consulted on include: (i) clarification that the guidance does not set any expectations on consumers; (ii) broadening the guidance where possible to include more detail on peer-to-peer disputes; and (iii) clarification on how to use information from Companies House, as an unverified source of information. The PSR consulted on the draft guidance in July this year.

The U.K. Payment Systems Regulator updated its Powers and Procedures Guidance to reflect recent developments in its processes and structure. The guidance explains: (i) the PSR's role and its ways of working; (ii) the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 legal and regulatory framework under which it operates; (iii) the PSR's powers to take regulatory action under the FSBRA, how the PSR will decide what, if any, action to take, what processes and procedures it will follow, and how a party can appeal against regulatory action; and (iv) the PSR's powers to take enforcement action under the FSBRA where it considers that a potential compliance failure has occurred, how it will decide what, if any, enforcement action to take, what processes and procedures it will follow, and how a party can appeal against a decision to impose a penalty or publish details of any compliance failure.

The PSR has also published a response to its October 2023 consultation on the updated guidance. Changes to the guidance include in relation to: (a) the process for opening an investigation; and (b) flexibility for staff deployed on monitoring or enforcement to work across functions. The guidance applies from September 20, 2024.

Post Brexit, the U.K. Government and Financial Conduct Authority are committed to the ongoing reform programme to reinvigorate the U.K.'s capital markets. As part of this, the Government and FCA are committed to replacing EU-inherited consumer cost disclosure regulation with a new framework tailored to U.K. markets and firms, and removing the legal uncertainties that arose from the EU Packaged Retail and Insurance-Based Investment Products Regulation, particularly as to the scope of instruments captured. HM Treasury and the FCA have announced final plans to reform U.K. retail disclosure rules. HM Treasury plans to replace the EU-inherited PRIIPs Regulation with a new framework for Consumer Composite Investments (CCIs). HM Treasury aims to lay legislation as soon as possible to provide the FCA with the appropriate powers to deliver this reform. The new CCI regime will deliver more tailored and flexible rules which will address concerns across industry with current disclosure requirements, including for costs.

Read more.

The Payment Systems Authority has published a consultation paper on a draft statement of policy on its cost benefit analysis (CBA) framework. The draft statement builds on and replaces the draft CBA framework published earlier this year, and explains the PSR's approach to CBAs and how the CBA framework in this document helps the PSR develop policies with a positive impact. The draft statement of policy also:

• Sets out the purposes of the PSR's CBAs and how it sees them being applied in the most useful way.
• Explains the typical circumstances in which the PSR develops and publishes CBAs.
• Presents the scope and high-level methodology of the PSR's CBAs, including the questions it tries to answer and how the PSR goes about answering them.
• Describes how the PSR develops CBAs.

The deadline for comments is November 3, 2024. The PSR aims to publish its final statement of policy at the end of the year.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published its findings from the first year of the implementation of the price and value outcome under the Consumer Duty. The specific focus of the price and value outcome rules is to ensure that the price a customer pays for a product or service is reasonable compared to the overall benefits they receive. Firms are expected to think about price when assessing fair value, but it should not be the sole consideration. The FCA rules do not set prices, require prices to be low or require firms to charge the same as competitors. However, the FCA requires firms to assess whether they are providing fair value and act if they are not.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published an update on progress in the cash savings market. This update provides further detail on how the cash savings market has developed since the FCA's update in December 2023. Specifically, the update considers the progress that has been made in respect of the points identified by the FCA in its July 2023 Review. In this update, the FCA identifies eight FCA-specific actions that should be helpful for all firms which offer cash savings products and highlights areas where it expects to see further improvements.

Since publication of the review, the FCA has seen improvements in both the rates available to savers and the volume and timing of firms' communications to savings customers. However, despite these improvements, the review of fair value assessments has shown that many firms have found the assessment of value challenging and the largest firms generally continue to pay below the market average for standard easy access products. The FCA reminds firms that they should be carefully reviewing its good and poor practice examples. The FCA also expects firms to improve fair value assessments over time and the FCA will take appropriate action where it considers this is not the case.

The FCA will continue to closely monitor firms' future savings rate changes and will expect a clear explanation where it identifies that a firm has changed its savings rates significantly more quickly and fully in response to interest rate reductions, compared to previous interest rate increases. The FCA explains that while it will continue to monitor how well the savings market is operating, it does not anticipate providing further savings updates unless it identifies further market-wide concerns not addressed within this publication.

The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on its proposals to restate, and in some cases modify, the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation requirements relating to the definition of own funds in its own rulebook. The PRA rules will replace the existing definition of own funds under CRR, which HM Treasury is proposing to revoke under draft legislation published on September 12, 2024 (discussed above).

The PRA proposes to restate in its rules the vast majority of the current U.K. CRR requirements in this area, with some modifications to ensure their operability in the PRA Rulebook, and to omit some provisions that are not necessary or relevant for U.K. firms. The PRA also proposes to make some minor adjustments to enhance the proportionality or transparency of the PRA's approach covering the following elements of the definition of own funds framework: (i) proportionality in the Pre/Post-Issuance Notification regime; (ii) inclusion of interim profits in Common Equity Tier 1 capital resources; (iii) reduction of Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments; (iv) clarification of the regulatory capital treatment of non-CET1 shares; (v) a requirement for PRA permission for additional forms of capital reduction; and (vi) permitting the terms governing CET1 instruments to reflect the possibility of (but not commit to) a future capital reduction.

Read more.

The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on streamlining the Pillar 2A capital framework and capital communications process. In addition to PRA-regulated banks, building societies, designated investment firms and PRA-approved or PRA-designated holding companies, the revised rules will also be relevant to Small Domestic Deposit Takers, firms who meet the SDDT criteria and are considering becoming a SDDT and firms that anticipate being subject to the Interim Capital Regime. The deadline for comments is December 12, 2024.

Read more. 

The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published its second near-final Policy Statement on the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards. The PRA has decided to move the implementation date by a further six months to January 1, 2026 with a transitional period of 4 years to ensure full implementation by January 1, 2030.

The policy statement provides feedback to responses to the following sections of the PRA's Consultation Paper 16/22: Chapter 3 – credit risk – standardized approach; Chapter 4 – credit risk – internal ratings based approach; Chapter 5 - credit risk mitigation; Chapter 9 - output floor; Chapter 11 - disclosure (Pillar 3); and Chapter 12 - reporting. The statement also contains feedback to responses on the parts of Pillar 2 relating to the Pillar 2A credit risk methodology, use of IRB approach benchmarks, and the interaction with the output floor.

Read more. 
 

The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on its proposed simplified capital regime and additional liquidity simplifications for small domestic deposit takers. This consultation forms the second phase of the PRA's simplified prudential regulation for SDDTs, the PRA having already finalised its requirements in relation to non-capital related prudential regulation, along with the criteria that must be met to be a SDDT. Together with the Phase 1 simplifications, the proposals would create a simpler, more certain and less costly capital regime for SDDTs.

Read more. 

The U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on amendments to the U.K. framework on capital buffers under the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-Prudential Measures) Regulations (CBR), which will be revoked. HM Treasury has published a draft statutory instrument that will restate certain of the CBR provisions. Other provisions under the CBR will be transferred to the PRA's rulebook. The CBR sets out the statutory framework for the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), Capital Conservation Buffer (CcoB), Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SII) buffer, Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) buffer and the Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB).

The PRA's consultation does not propose changes to its policy approach to capital buffers, but rather streamlines some of its policy materials to enhance usability and clarity. The PRA may make further amendments to its proposals depending on the outcome of HM Treasury's proposed changes to the CBR. The PRA proposes to: (i) revoke the U.K. Technical Standards on the methodology for the identification of G-SIIs; (ii) introduce a new Statement of Policy (SoP) setting out the PRA's approach to G-SII identification and buffers, which will replace the aforementioned U.K. Technical Standards and relevant provisions to be revoked in the CBR; (iii) make minor amendments to the PRA's existing Statements of Policy on O-SII designation and O-SII buffer setting to reflect proposed amendments to the CBR; and (iv) make minor consequential amendments to PRA rules that refer directly to the current CBR.

The deadline for responses to the PRA's consultation is December 12, 2024. The PRA proposes that the implementation date for the changes will be Q2 2025.

HM Treasury has published a policy update to confirm its legislative approach for applying the "FSMA model" to the assimilated EU capital requirements regime under the U.K. Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Buffers Regulations. The application of the Financial Services and Markets Act model, which transfers firm-facing rulemaking powers to the regulators, will take place in three stages. HM Treasury will: (i) revoke articles of the U.K. CRR which the U.K. Prudential Regulation Authority will replace with rules in order to implement the Basel 3.1 package; (ii) revoke any U.K. CRR provisions left on the statute book following Basel 3.1 implementation and revoke and restate (with modifications) the CBR; and (iii) publish new legislation to: (a) restate the U.K. CRR equivalence regimes in legislation (with the exception of the Article 142 regime); (b) restate (with certain modifications) key U.K. CRR definitions which are needed to ensure that the overall framework continues to operate as intended; and (c) make any consequential amendments to other parts of the statute book which will be needed once the U.K. CRR has been completely revoked.

Read more.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published guidance to assist firms in making an application for an overseas investment fund to be recognised under the Overseas Funds Regime. The OFR will allow certain investment funds established outside the U.K. to be promoted in the U.K., including to retail clients. At the outset, the OFR will be available to most funds established in EEA and EU member states that have been authorised under the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (other than EEA UCITS that have been authorised as money market funds).

The FCA provides details of the application process and sets out the standards required of funds to be eligible for the regime, including that they are managed in the best interests of investors, hold appropriate investments that align with a clear investment objective and policy and demonstrate good governance. The FCA sets out certain features that funds may exhibit that are unlikely to be compatible with its standards. These include: (i) funds with unsuitable names; (ii) funds that have economic exposure to cannabis-related investments; (iii) funds that have exposure to crypto-currency; (iv) funds that have exposure to contingent convertible bonds; and (v) liquid funds that charge permanent redemption/exit charges.

Read more.

The Trade, Aircraft and Shipping Sanctions (Civil Enforcement) Regulations 2024 (together with explanatory memorandum) have been laid in Parliament. The Regulations equip the soon to be launched Office of Trade Sanctions Implementation (OTSI) with its civil enforcement powers. Breach of trade, aircraft and shipping sanctions is already a criminal offence, but it is hoped the introduction of civil penalties will strengthen the U.K. government's enforcement capability. OTSI will be responsible for the civil enforcement of certain trade sanctions as they relate to U.K. services and overseas trade with a U.K. nexus. The office will be able to impose monetary penalties of up to £1 million, or 50% of the estimated value of the breach, whichever is higher. Where a civil monetary penalty can be imposed, breaches may be determined on a 'strict liability' basis. OTSI will also be empowered to make public disclosure of breaches. The Regulations introduce reporting obligations for relevant persons, and powers to request information. Failure to comply with either of these can amount to a criminal offence. The powers will come into effect on 10 October. To assist people in complying with the new regulations, the Department for Business and Trade has published statutory guidance. It covers the prohibitions and requirements imposed by the regulations and provides guidance on compliance, enforcement and the circumstances where they do not apply.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has published a consultation paper on a new regulatory reporting return for consumer credit firms engaging in any one, or more, of the regulated activities of credit broking, providing credit information services, debt adjusting and debt counselling services. If introduced, the new return will replace some of the existing returns for these activities. The return will include the following five mandatory sections of questions for all firms in scope: (i) permissions – regarding the regulated activities firms have undertaken in the past 12 months; (ii) business model – regarding the financial products, goods, and/or services that firms are providing; (iii) marketing – regarding the channels firms are using to target consumers; (iv) revenue – total revenue from credit-related activities and non-credit related activities; and (v) employees – regarding the number of employees and incentive and remuneration arrangements. Firms will then be presented tailored questions specific to the relevant permissions they hold. The FCA hopes to receive more detailed, accurate, and consistent data from firms through the proposed return, as well as simplifying the experience for firms. This should enable the FCA to accurately identify how firms are using their permissions so that it can better understand which firms are engaging in activities with a higher risk of harm to consumers and how these risks are changing over time. The data will also help the FCA to identify earlier firms that aren't using their permissions and no longer require authorisation. The deadline for comments is October 31, 2024. The FCA intends to publish a final policy statement in Spring 2025. The FCA proposes that the first reporting period will cover January 1 to December 31, 2025. There will be no change to the reporting frequency for firms.

The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation has published a financial sanctions notice reminding firms of their annual frozen assets reporting requirement. Every year HM Treasury carries out a review to update its records to reflect any changes to these assets during the reporting period. As part of this review, HM Treasury requests all persons that hold or control funds or economic resources belonging to, owned, held, or controlled by a designated person, to provide a report to OFSI with the details of these assets. The deadline for submission is November 11, 2024. The report must include details of all funds or economic resources frozen in the U.K. as well as those overseas where these funds or economic resources are subject to U.K. financial sanctions legislation. Accounts blocked solely by other national authorities (e.g., Office of Foreign Assets Control) do not need to be reported. The report must include the value of all such assets as at close of business on September 30, 2024. Reports therefore must not be submitted before this date. Firms that submitted a report last year (other than a nil return) and no longer hold the frozen assets should submit a nil return.