The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced the creation of a new group called the Wholesale Product Office. The WPO, currently a function within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Executive Office, manages the Fedwire Funds, Fedwire Securities, and the National Settlement Service. Richard P. Dzina will serve as the head of the WPO as of July 1, 2015, as well as a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Management Committee.

View the press release.

The Bank of England published a consolidated version of its rules for Recognized Clearing Houses. RCHs are regulated by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and are subject to the FSMA 2000 (Recognition Requirements) Regulations 2001, though different recognition requirements will apply under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation for RCHs that are also CCPs. RCHs that are also CCPs must comply with domestic requirements as well as EMIR. All UK RCHs must comply with the BoE rules.

View the BoE RCH rules.

The EBA published the new taxonomy for national regulators to provide data to the EBA under the supervisory reporting requirements set out in the Capital Requirements Directive. The revised taxonomy is for reporting on funding plans and supervisory benchmarking from December 31, 2014 onwards. The revised taxonomy incorporates corrections to funding plans and benchmarking reporting structures.

View the EBA announcement.

The European Banking Authority published its final report on guidelines on triggers for the use of early intervention powers under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. The final guidelines provide national regulators with guidance on when to apply early intervention measures to firms. National regulators are not obliged to apply the triggers automatically and may even apply the measures when the triggers are not met. The guidelines identify the following triggers: (i) overall Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process score and outcome, expanding on when regulators should consider application of the early intervention measures; (ii) material changes or anomalies identified in the monitoring of key financial and non-financial indicators under SREP; and (iii) significant events indicating that the conditions for early intervention are met. The final guidelines will apply from January 1, 2016.

View the guidelines.

Jeremiah O. Norton submitted his resignation as Director of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Mr. Norton has served as Director of the FDIC since April 16, 2012. His resignation will become effective on June 5, 2015.

View the press release.

The SEC announced that David Grim wills serve as the new Director of the Division of Investment Management. Mr. Grim has been the acting director of the Division of Investment Management since February 2015.

View the SEC press release.

The European Commission and US Commodity Futures Trading Commission published a statement made jointly by Jonathan Hill, European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, and Timothy Massad, CFTC Chairman. Mr Massad and Commissioner Hill discussed a possible European Commission equivalence decision for CCPs regulated and supervised by the CFTC, and the statement reveals that discussions will continue so that an approach may be finalized by summer 2015.

View the statement.

The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper comprising draft Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft ITS aim to determine the mapping between credit ratings and credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights to ECAIs’ ratings issued on securitizations. Under the CRR, risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approach for securitization positions should be based on the credit quality of those positions established according to the credit ratings of ECAIs. The ITS aim to enhance regulatory harmonization across the EU allowing credit ratings of all registered credit rating agencies to be used for calculating institutions’ capital requirements. Responses to the consultation are due by August 7, 2015.

View the consultation paper.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published a consultation on sound practices at large intermediaries, discussing alternatives to the use of credit ratings in assessing creditworthiness. The report lists thirteen draft practices to be considered by large market intermediaries when developing internal credit assessment policies. These aim to encourage the implementation of efficient alternative methods to assess creditworthiness and reduce the overreliance on credit rating agencies. These draft practices are to be considered also by regulators when overseeing market intermediaries. The draft sound practices include: (i) establishing independent credit assessment functions separate from other business units; (ii) incorporating diverse qualitative and quantitative measures into robust assessment processes; and (iii) improving credit risk assessment practices to ensure that firms remain well informed on the latest developments that might have an adverse effect on the firm. A final report will be prepared after responses to the consultation have been considered. Responses to the consultation are due by July 8, 2015.

View the consultation.

The New York State Department of Financial Services announced that it has granted a charter under the New York Banking Law to itBit Trust Company, LLC – a commercial Bitcoin exchange based in New York City. The announcement establishes ItBit as the first virtual currency company to receive a charter from the NYDFS. This announcement caps a series of announcements from the NYDFS, outlining and establishing regulatory guidelines for virtual currencies. Most recently, in December 2014, the NYDFS released a framework for licensing virtual currency firms, known as the "Bitlicense framework." The BitLicense framework included consumer protection, anti-money laundering compliance and cyber security rules tailored for virtual currency firms, including the creation of a two-year transitional BitLicense to assist startups. The additional comment period for the revised BitLicense framework ended in March 2015 and NYDFS expects to put forward its final regulatory framework later this month.

View the press release.

The EBA published its final report on guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators, including the final guidelines. Under the Banking Recovery and Resolution Directive, banks and certain investment firms are required to prepare recovery plans setting out the measures that a firm would take to restore its financial position. Recovery plans are required to include a set of indicators which identify when any of the measures included in the recovery plan are to be invoked. The final guidelines, which should be read in conjunction with the guidelines on the range of scenarios to test recovery scenarios, must be agreed by the national regulator charged with approving the overall recovery plan of a firm. The final guidelines specify that each recovery plan must include capital, liquidity, profitability and asset quality recovery plan indicators. Market-based indicators and macroeconomic indicators must also be included in a recovery plan unless the national regulator agrees that such indicator/s is not relevant to the firm’s legal structure, risk profile, size and complexity. For each category of indicators, the guidelines set out the specific indicators to be included. The guidelines are a minimum list of indicators and firms should not limit their indicators to that minimum. The guidelines will apply from July 31, 2015 to banks and investment firms subject to the BRRD and to national regulators.

View the guidelines.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission approved a proposal by the national securities exchanges and the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority regarding a two-year pilot program widening the minimum quoting and trading increments, known as "tick sizes" for stocks of some small firms. The pilot program aims to assess whether wider tick sizes would improve the quality of small company stocks for issuers and investors.

View the the SEC press release.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its guidelines on the application of the definition of commodity derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (known as MiFID I). The guidelines aim to provide a common, uniform and consistent application of the definition of commodity derivatives. There is no commonly adopted definition of derivatives in the EU under MiFID I, which can result in the inconsistent application of EMIR when it refers to the MiFID commodity derivatives definition. The guidelines also aim to ensure continuity when MiFID II replaces MiFID I from January 3, 2017. The guidelines will apply from August 7, 2015.

View the guidelines.

The TARGET2-Securities advisory group of the European Central Bank published an impact analysis report on non-compliance with T2S harmonization standards. The standards aim to provide a single centralized platform for securities settlement in central bank funds across European securities markets. In November 2014, six jurisdictions declared that it would not be likely that they would be able to comply with some of the obligatory harmonization standards by the time their markets plan to migrate to T2S. These jurisdictions are Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Romania and Switzerland. The report states that there have been no new cases of non-compliance with T2S harmonization standards. The T2S group has assessed the impact of non-compliant T2S markets on the T2S community as a whole. For the Belgian, Dutch, French, Romanian and Swiss markets, the impact of non-compliance is deemed to be manageable and the T2S group has asked for the further monitoring of implementation plans. A decision for the German market has been postponed until the next impact analysis.

View the impact analysis.

The Council of the European Union issued a press release stating it had reached a tentative agreement with the European Parliament on a draft directive that would further the development of electronic payments in the EU market. The new directive will incorporate and repeal the existing Payment Services Directive to create a new framework for emerging and innovative payment services, including internet and mobile payments, providing a more secure and harmonized environment for payments. Once the full text is finalized, the draft directive will need to be confirmed by the Council, submitted to the European Parliament for a vote and then to the Council for adoption. Once adopted, member states will have two years to transpose the directive into national law.

View the press release.

The CFTC’s Division of Clearing and Risk issued an interpretive letter in response to letters from the Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, among others. The CFTC letter clarifies that a securitization special purpose vehicle wholly-owned by, and consolidated with, an entity as described in Section 2(h)(7)(C)(iii) of the Commodity Exchange Act qualifies as a captive finance company. Captive finance companies, in turn, are eligible to elect the end-user exception from the clearing requirement issued by the CFTC under Section 2(h) of the CEA.

View the press release.

The European Banking Authority published a report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 capital instruments issued by EU institutions. Under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation, the EBA must monitor the quality of own funds instruments issued by EU institutions. The report presents the EBA’s recent monitoring results and updates the EBA’s earlier report on the topic, published in October 2014. The EBA has examined fifteen AT1 issuances made between August 2013 and November 2014, five of which were made under a conversion mechanism and ten under a temporary write-down mechanism. The report states that certain provisions or wording of existing AT1 instruments should be avoided or revised so that uncertainty and complexity is minimized. Wording used should be consistent with that in the CRR, for example, "non-objection" cannot be used as a substitute for "supervisory permission," a term used in the CRR. The EBA intends to continue monitoring certain AT1 issuances, expects that future issuances will use some level of standardization, and advises that terms and conditions should not be unjustifiably complex. The EBA will also develop standardized terms and conditions for AT1 issuances. These would be non-compulsory for institutions, but would help to ensure compliance with regulatory provisions. The EBA report is not fully comprehensive and a final report will be published at the end of May 2015.

View the report.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced the resignation of Sarah Dahlgren, executive vice president and head of the New York Fed’s Financial Institution Supervision Group. On October 1, 2015, Ms. Dahlgren will assume the role of senior advisor to the president of the New York Fed, Mr. William C. Dudley. Ms. Dahlgren is expected to remain in her current position as head of FISG until October 1, 2015, to assist with the transition.

View the press release.

The UK Prudential Regulation Authority published a policy statement introducing the final rule that implements the Branch Return, a new return that will collect data biannually from EEA and non-EEA firms with UK branches. The final rule is also directed at firms looking to operate in the UK in the future. The new return gathers quantitative information on economic functions performed by branches in the UK and aims to enhance the PRA’s understanding of the impact that branches have on UK financial stability.

View the Policy Statement and Branch Return Form.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published its third consultation paper on the PRA Rulebook, setting out proposals to amend or delete certain modules of the PRA Handbook and create a new PRA Rulebook. The aim of the review is to reshape materials inherited from the Financial Services Authority to create a Rulebook which contains PRA rules only and follows the split of the FSA into the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority. This is intended to facilitate firms’ compliance with PRA rules and to provide access to more concise rules, resulting in a more comprehensive understanding of the PRA’s requirements. The consultation paper sets out suggested Rulebook parts including on: (i) the exercise of passport rights by UK firms; (ii) reverse stress-testing (which will be moved to the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment part of the Rulebook); and (iii) integrated regulatory reporting. The consultation paper also includes draft supervisory statements on: (i) guidelines for completing regulatory reports; (ii) internal governance of third country branches; (iii) Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process; and (iv) internal governance. Responses to the consultation are due by June 30, 2015.

View the consultation paper.

The US Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Task Force on Consumer Compliance issued interagency examination procedures for Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) and Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act). The procedures reflect recent amendments by the CFPB to Regulation Z and Regulation X that, among other things, revised and integrated the disclosures received in connection with certain closed-end mortgage loans. The guidance will become effective on August 1, 2015.

View the Federal Reserve Board’s press release.

View a summary of the updates to the examination procedures.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System released its Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity. The report delivers aggregate information on applications submitted by bank holding companies, state member banks, savings and loan holding companies, foreign banking organizations, and other entities and individuals for approval to undertake various transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, and engaging in new activities. The latest report covers the period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. During that period, 681 proposals were reviewed, of which 629 were approved and 52 were withdrawn. Among other things, the report noted that merger and acquisition proposals are generally more complex than other proposals. The average and median number of days to approve such an application is 60 and 41 days, respectively, but the average number of days to approve an application that receives adverse public comments is 206 days.

View the latest Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a list of ten third country central counterparties that have been recognized to offer services in the EU under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. These third country CCPs are established in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore, jurisdictions that are deemed by the European Commission to have legal and supervisory provisions for CCPs equivalent to the regime for EU CCPs under EMIR. The ten CCPs are ASX Clear (Futures) Pty Ltd, ASX Clear Pty Ltd, HKFE Clearing Corporation Limited, Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited, OTC Clearing Hong Kong Limited, SEHK Options Clearing House Limited, Japan Securities Clearing Corporation, Tokyo Financial Exchange Inc, Singapore Exchange Derivatives Clearing Limited and The Central Depository (Pte) Limited. The recognized CCPs will be able to provide clearing services to clearing members or trading venues established in the EU and clearing on these CCPs will satisfy the clearing obligation under EMIR.

View the list of third-country CCPs.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules that would require companies to disclose to shareholders the relationship between executive compensation and the financial performance of a company. The proposal, which is designed to enhance company transparency and to allow shareholders to be better informed when making voting decisions to elect directors, would require a company to disclose for itself as well as for other companies in its peer group certain information, including but not limited to information regarding executive pay and performance as well as total shareholder return. Under the rule, companies would be required to disclose the relevant information for the last five fiscal years. Smaller reporting companies, as defined in the proposed rule, would only be required to provide disclosure for the last three fiscal years. The proposed rule provides for a phased-in compliance period for these requirements. The comment period for the SEC proposal is 60 days after publication in the Federal Register which occurred on April 29, 2015. 

View our client note on this development.

View the SEC press release.

The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper to update its data template for the identification methodology for Global Systemically Important Institutions under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. This review follows on from the introduction by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision of new identification methodology in January 2015. The consultation paper includes a draft regulation amending the regulatory technical standards on the identification methodology for G-SIIs and the implementing technical standards on uniform format and date of disclosure by G-SIIs. The new data template comprises minor technical revisions such as: (i) average exchange rates being provided by the relevant supervisory authority rather than the respondent bank; and (ii) long-term monitoring items being re-labeled as "Ancillary Data". The scope of the disclosure requirements under CRD IV remains unchanged. Draft revised guidelines on further specification of the indicators of global systemic importance are also included in the consultation paper. Going forward, the data template will be incorporated into the guidelines and instructions specifying how the template should be completed will be published on the EBA website. Responses to the consultation are due by May 30, 2015.

View the consultation paper.

Comptroller of the Currency Thomas J. Curry appointed Michael Brickman as Deputy Comptroller for Thrift Supervision. Mr. Brickman will also continue to serve as Deputy Comptroller for Special Supervision.

View the press release.

The European Securities and Markets Authority launched a consultation on draft guidelines specifying the criteria for the assessment of the knowledge and competence of employees in investment firms that provide investment advice, information aboutfinancial instruments, investment services or ancillary services to clients. Under the new Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, investment firms will have to ensure and be able to demonstrate to national regulators that employees of the firm involved in such activities have the necessary knowledge and competence to provide such advice, to act in the best interests of the client and to act honestly, fairly and professionally. The draft guidelines will apply to investment firms and national regulators from January 3, 2017, the date that MiFID II comes into effect. Responses to the consultation are due by July 10, 2015. ESMA intends to publish its final report in Q4 2015.
 

View the consultation paper.

The CFTC’s Division of Market Oversight issued guidance to SEFs concerning the calculation of projected operating costs for the purpose of complying with the financial resource requirements under SEF Core Principle 13 and CFTC Regulation 13.1303. This guidance follows two no-action letters providing relief for erroneous swap trades and swap trade confirmations issued on April 22, 2015. The guidance provides that the cost of variable commissions that a voice-based SEF might pay its employee-brokers does not need to be included in a SEF’s calculation of projected operating costs. However, any fixed salaries or compensation payable to the SEF’s employee-brokers must be included in the calculation of projected operating expenses.

View the CFTC guidance to SEFs.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a call for evidence on investment using virtual currency or distributed ledger technology. ESMA has been monitoring virtual currency investment to understand market developments, the potential benefits and risks for investors and potential issues for market integrity and financial stability. ESMA sets out its analysis in the paper and requests feedback on three particular topics: (i) virtual currency investment products, such as collective investment schemes or derivatives that have virtual currencies as an underlying or which invest in virtual currency businesses; (ii) virtual currency based assets, securities and asset transfers; and (iii) the application of distributed ledger technology to securities. ESMA is not proposing regulatory action at this stage but will continue to monitor investments using virtual currencies or distributed ledger technology to assist national regulators in keeping up to date with market developments. In July 2014, the European Banking Authority published an opinion proposing a potential regulatory regime for virtual currencies and advising national regulators to “discourage” financial institutions from buying, holding or selling them until a regulatory regime is in place.

View the call for evidence.

The Financial Stability Board published a statement written by FSB Chairman Mark Carney to the International Monetary and Financial Committee. The statement contains information on ongoing work to finalize post-crisis reforms and measures being taken by the FSB to promote financial stability. The letter discusses certain financial vulnerabilities, such as diminished market liquidity, asset price discontinuities, financial institution misconduct and contagion across markets. The statement reports certain measures taken by the FSB to address these risks, including the formulation of a plan to identify financial stability risks associated with market liquidity in fixed-income markets and asset management activities, ending too-big-to fail for global systemically important banks and developing procedures for implementation monitoring of the agreed international financial regulatory reforms.
 

View the statement.

US and UK regulators imposed fines on Deutsche Bank AG for failings related to EURIBOR and LIBOR (collectively known as IBOR) submissions. The CFTC imposed a financial penalty of $800 million, the US Department of Justice imposed a financial penalty of $775 million on DB Group Services (UK) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, which agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud for its role in manipulating LIBOR, the New York Department of Financial Services imposed a fine of $600 million and the UK FCA imposed a fine of £227 million (circa $340 million). The FCA found that Deutsche Bank had breached several regulatory requirements by attempting to manipulate IBOR rates and improperly influence IBOR submissions and for failing to have proper systems and controls in place. The FCA also fined the bank for the failure by its Managers and Senior Managers to deal with it in an open and cooperative way, for misleading the FCA and for not responding to requests for information timeously and effectively.

The CFTC Order stated that from at least 2005 through early 2011, and across currencies, Deutsche Bank’s submitters routinely took into account other Deutsche Bank traders’ derivatives trading positions, as well as their own cash and derivatives trading positions, when making the bank’s IBOR submissions. Furthermore, Deutsche Bank allowed submitters and traders to prioritize profit motives over appropriate submission considerations, permitted a culture of trader self-interest to exist and created conflicts of interest, which allowed the misconduct to occur.

View the FCA notice.

View the CFTC order.

View the New York Department of Financial Services order.

View the US Department of Justice press release

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight and the Division of Clearing and Risk issued two no-action letters providing certain time-limited relief to swap execution facilities and designated contract markets. CFTC Staff Letter 15-24 provides time-limited relief from certain CFTC regulations to permit SEFs and DCMs to correct clerical or operational errors that may cause a swap to be rejected for clearing and permits counterparties to resubmit the trade with the correct terms. The no-action letter also permits SEFs and DCMs to correct clerical or operational errors revealed after a swap has been cleared. It allows counterparties to execute a trade to offset the cleared trade and submit a new trade with the correct terms. The relief provided is set to expire on June 15, 2016.

CFTC Staff Letter 15-25 extends the time period for relief previously provided in No-Action Letter 14-108, from September 30, 2015 to March 31, 2016, with certain modifications. This Confirmation No-Action Letter provides relief to SEFs from certain requirements concerning trade confirmations required from SEFs for non-cleared swaps. Specifically, it provides relief to SEFs from the requirement to obtain documents that are incorporated by reference in a trade confirmation issued by a SEF, prior to issuing the confirmation. Additionally, the letter relieves SEFs from the requirement to preserve such documents as records.

View CFTC Staff Letter 15-24.

View CFTC Staff Letter 15-25.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision agreed to eliminate certain national discretions from the Basel II capital framework. The use of national discretions can hinder comparability across jurisdictions and increase variability in risk-weighted assets. The Basel Committee has agreed to remove national discretions from the Basel II capital framework regarding: (i) the treatment of past due loans; (ii) the definition of retail exposures; (iii) transitional arrangements for corporate, sovereign, bank and retail exposures; (iv) the rating structure standards for wholesale exposures; (v) internal and external audit; and (vi) re-ageing. The national discretion for the internal ratings-based approach treatment of equity exposures will expire in 2016. The Basel Committee intends to monitor national discretions that are still available and consider whether more of them should be removed. The Basel Committee also responded to a frequently asked question on funding valuation adjustment. The FAQ notes that a bank’s adoption of FVA should not have the effect of offsetting or reducing its “own credit” adjustment. A bank should continue to derecognize its debit valuation adjustment in full, whether or not it has adopted a funding valuation-type adjustment.

View the press release.

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPR”), seeking input on potential new recordkeeping standards for certain FDIC-insured institutions with more than two million deposit accounts. The FDIC is required to provide depositors with access to their insured accounts as soon as possible after an institution fails. For a bank with a large number of deposit accounts, payments might be delayed if the bank’s records are unclear or incomplete, making it difficult to determine what is insured and what is not. Generally, the FDIC seeks input on whether banks with a large number of deposit accounts should be required to have a greater responsibility in the deposit insurance determination process. Specifically, the FDIC seeks comment on whether banks should be required to meet certain records standards, including the ability to calculate insured and uninsured amounts for each depositor at the end of each business day. The FDIC also seeks input on what types of new data requirements would aid a quick and effective insurance determination process as well as the appropriate threshold for institutions to have to comply with the potential new requirements. The proposals will be open for comment for 90 days after the ANPR has been published in the Federal Register.
 

View a statement issued by FDIC Director, Jeremiah O. Norton.

View the press release.

The Council of the EU approved a new directive and regulation aimed at strengthening rules against money laundering and terrorist financing. The new set of laws, when in effect, aim to bring the EU in line with approaches currently taken internationally, and follow the recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force which is deemed to be a global reference for anti-money laundering and terrorist financing. The final text of the regulation and directive is yet to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Once published, member states will have two years to transpose the directive into national law. The regulation will be directly applicable in EU Member States without the need for any further transposition. The new laws will repeal the current European regulation and directive on anti-money laundering and terrorist financing.
 

View the proposed texts of the regulation and directive and press release.

The Council of the EU adopted a regulation that would increase the capital available for long-term investment in the EU economy. The new kind of fund vehicle, the European long-term investment fund, known as an ELTIF, is expected to provide investors with stable long term returns. An ELTIF will be subject to additional rules, requiring it, for example, to invest at least 70% of its capital in clearly defined categories of assets. Only alternative investment funds managed by alternative investment fund managers and authorized under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive would be able to market themselves as ELTIFs. The regulation will come into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

View the text of the regulations.

The Financial Stability Board chair wrote a letter to the G20 Financial Ministers and Central Bank Governors on the FSB’s progress on the financial regulation agenda. The letter includes information on continuing work to finalize post-crisis reforms in two major areas: (i) ending too-big-to-fail for financial institutions; and (ii) emerging vulnerabilities, specifically, financial stability risks, especially those from asset managers, and misconduct risks and withdrawal from correspondent banking.

View the letter.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Division of Banking, Supervision and Regulation issued information regarding the operating structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee supervisory program. SR Letter 15-7 provides information on the program’s organizational structure, including the roles and responsibilities of the committees, subgroups and dedicated supervisory teams that collectively comprise the LISCC’s governance structure. Established in 2010, the LISCC program aims to oversee and supervise the largest, most systemically important financial institutions using a centralized process and is comprised of senior Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Bank officers and financial professionals.

View the letter.

The European Banking Authority published its annual assessment on the EU Colleges of Supervisors. Colleges bring together regulatory authorities that supervise a banking group and provide a framework for coordinating and performing supervisory duties within the EU banking sector. The College of Supervisors is established for EEA banks with subsidiaries or significant branches in other EEA countries and includes national regulators from the EU as well as non-EU areas when necessary. The EBA’s assessment specifies an action plan for 2015, and states that the College’s 2014 action plan was fulfilled to a reasonable extent with improvements in the efficiency of EU supervisory cooperation and the development of a better understanding of the risk profiles of cross-border banking groups. The 2015 action plan covers issues such as: (i) credit, conduct and IT risk; (ii) key tasks for supervisory colleges, including joint decisions on capital and liquidity; and (iii) how best to align the functioning of the College with the new Regulatory Technical Standards and Implementing Technical Standards on the operational functioning of supervisory colleges.

View the assessment.

The European Banking Authority published a report on the eXtensible Business Reporting Language taxonomy filing rules. National regulators use this taxonomy to provide data to the EBA under the supervisory reporting requirements set out in the new European capital requirements legislation. The document corrects the scheme identifier for pre-LEIs. Supervisory reporting covers own funds, financial information, large exposures, leverage and liquidity ratios, asset encumbrance and funding plans

View the report.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Division of Banking, Supervision and Regulation issued information regarding the operating structure of the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee supervisory program. SR Letter 15-7 provides information on the program’s organizational structure, including the roles and responsibilities of the committees, subgroups and dedicated supervisory teams that collectively comprise the LISCC’s governance structure. Established in 2010, the LISCC program aims to oversee and supervise the largest, most systemically important financial institutions using a centralized process and is comprised of senior Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Bank officers and financial professionals.

View the letter.

President Obama announced the nomination of the US Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Director, Adam Szubin, for the role of Undersecretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Crimes.

View the press release.

On April 16 and 17, 2015, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors held their second meeting under Turkish presidency in Washington, DC. Further to the meeting, a communiqué was published which detailed the conclusions of the group as well as its goals for the future. The G20 stated, amongst other things, that (i) the commitment remains to finalize the total loss absorbing capacity standard for global financial institutions by November 2015; (ii) gaps in the recovery and resolution of CCPs will be identified and addressed; (iii) the G20 roadmap for the regulation of shadow banking is being implemented; and (iv) that cross-border cooperation will be enhanced to ensure more effective regulations, particularly for resolution and OTC derivative market reforms. The G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors will meet again in September 2015. The next G20 summit is in November 2015.
 

View the communiqué.

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a final rule intended to improve the process for companies submitting consumer credit card agreements to the CFPB. The final rule suspends credit card issuers’ obligations to submit their credit card agreements to the CFPB for one year. The purpose of the suspension period is to give the CFPB time to create a more streamlined and automated electronic submission system. Under the rule, credit card issuers will not be required to submit agreements that would otherwise have been due to the CFPB by the first business day on or after April 30, 2015, July 31, 2015, October 31, 2015 and January 31, 2016. During the temporary suspension period, the CFPB will collect consumer credit card agreements from credit card issuers’ public websites and post the agreements to its online consumer credit card agreements database. Credit card issuers will be required to resume submitting credit card agreements on a quarterly basis starting on April 30, 2016.

View the final rule.

Regulations on the calculation of margin periods of risk of netting sets, which calculation firms must use to calculate their own funds requirements when acting as a clearing member, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulations, which supplement the Capital Requirements Regulation, provide for the calculation of exposures to clients according to whether a transaction is cleared by a qualifying CCP or not. A qualifying CCP is one which has been authorized or recognized under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation.

View the Regulations.

The Financial Conduct Authority published final guidance for Multilateral Trading Facility operators on regulatory requirements for MTF rulebooks and procedures as set out in the Market Conduct Sourcebook of the FCA Handbook. The FCA consulted on its proposed guidance late in 2014 which was based on feedback received through a thematic review. The FCA expects all MTF operators to be able to demonstrate that they have considered the good practice observations included in the guidance when setting their approach to compliance with the Market Conduct requirements.

View the final guidance.

The European Securities and Markets Authority announced that the latest set of statistical data on the performance of credit ratings is available in the Central Ratings Repository. CEREP contains information on credit ratings issued by credit rating agencies which are either registered or certified in the European Union and is intended to assist investors in assessing the performance and reliability of credit ratings on different types of ratings, asset classes and geographical regions.

View ESMA's announcement.

The International Monetary Fund recently published two chapters for its annual Global Financial Stability Report discussing the risks mutual funds and local lenders may pose to financial stability. The two chapters are titled: “Chapter 2: International Banking After the Crisis: Increasingly Local and Safer?” and “Chapter 3: The Asset Management Industry and Financial Stability.” The IMF warns that mutual funds are increasingly crowding into the same securities, especially bond funds, and that this “herding behavior” may lead to financial instability.

View the chapter.