The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued the “Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act” booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook. The revised booklet replaces a similar booklet issued in October 2011 and provides updated information resulting from recent changes in Regulation X (12 CFR 1024) related to mortgage servicing and loss mitigation. Additionally, on April 15, 2015, the OCC issued the “Trade Finance and Services” booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook. The revised booklet replaces the “Trade Finance” and “Bankers’ Acceptances” booklets issued in November 1998 and September 1999, respectively.
 

View the OCC press release.
View the "Trade Finance and Services" booklet.
View the OCC bulletin for the "Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act" booklet.

The Federal Reserve Board requested public comment on proposed amendments to Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions). The amendments include making technical changes to the calculation of interest payments on certain balances maintained by depository institutions at Federal Reserve Banks. Comments on the proposal are requested within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register.

View the press release.

View the proposal.
 

The Financial Stability Board initiated the second review of resolution regimes in FSB member jurisdictions. The goal of the review is to survey the scope of resolution powers that are available in FSB jurisdictions for the banking sector. As part of the review, the FSB invites feedback from financial institutions, industry associations, and other stakeholders on the implementation of reforms to resolution regimes. Feedback should be submitted to the FSB by May 8, 2015 and the peer review report will be published in early 2016.

View the press release.

View the details of the peer review.

The European Banking Authority published its first report on progress towards convergence of supervisory practice across EU Member States. Under the Capital Requirements Directive, the EBA must report annually to the EU Parliament and the Council on the degree of convergence of supervisory practices between Member States. The EBA is responsible for developing a Single Rulebook and recommendations as well as a European supervisory handbook to promote consistency across the EU. The EBA’s report focuses on the supervisory review and evaluation process and assessment of risks (known as SREP), stress testing, review of permissions to use internal approach, and supervisory measures and powers. The EBA notes that there has been significant progress since 2011 in strengthening supervisory colleges and that supervisory convergence is under way. However, further work is required, such as the development of technical standards and guidelines on key aspects of the Internal Ratings Based Approach, the interaction between capital buffers, and additional capital requirements and implementation by national regulators of the EBA’s guidelines and other policy items relating to supervision.

View the EBA’s report.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a final rule expanding the applicability of its Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (“Policy Statement”) to include certain savings and loan holding companies and raising the asset threshold of the Policy Statement from $500 million to $1 billion in total consolidated assets. This rulemaking will allow a greater number of community banks to qualify for the advantages of being deemed a small bank holding company.

Small bank holding companies are exempt from the requirement to maintain consolidated regulatory capital ratios; instead, regulatory capital ratios only apply at the subsidiary bank level. This rule allows small bank holding companies to use non-equity funding, such as holding company loans, to finance growth and/or to use leverage to fund share repurchases and otherwise provide liquidity to shareholders.

The final rule implements a law passed in December 2014 by Congress. It will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

View the Federal Reserve Board press release.

View the draft final rule.
 

The International Organization of Securities Commissions launched two consultations on business continuity plans for trading venues and for market intermediaries which aim to address weaknesses and gaps in the business continuity plans and recovery strategies of trading venues and market intermediaries. The first consultation report, “Mechanisms for Trading Venues to Effectively Manage Electronic Trading Risks and Plans for Business Continuity,” focuses on how trading venues manage technology and the potential risks arising from technological developments and electronic trading. The second consultative report, “Market Intermediary Business Continuity and Recovery Planning,” proposes standards for regulators and sound practices for market intermediaries whilst recognizing that not all of the sound practices are suitable for each type of intermediary. Both consultations close on June 6, 2015.
 

View the consultation papers.

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued answers to certain frequently asked questions on the regulatory capital rule. The topics addressed in the FAQs include the following: (i) the definition of capital; (ii) separate account and equity exposures to investment funds; (iii) high volatility commercial real estate exposures; (iv) other real estate and off-balance-sheet exposures; (v) qualifying central counterparty questions; (vi) credit valuation adjustment questions; and (vii) other miscellaneous questions.
 

The full text of the FAQs.

 

The OCC named Maryann H. Kennedy and Kris A. McIntire Deputy Comptrollers for Large Bank Supervision. In this role, Ms. Kennedy and Mr. McIntire will oversee the supervision of a portion of the OCC’s large bank portfolio.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published further Rules and Supervisory Statements and Policy Statements that will form part of the PRA Rulebook. The new Rulebook parts include verification of standing data rules and internal governance rules. The new Supervisory Statements cover internal governance, exercising certain functions under the Building Societies Act 1986 and supervising building societies’ treasury and lending activities. Also published is a new Policy Statement on the PRA’s approach to insurance business transfers. The PRA is creating a stand-alone PRA Rulebook and intends to launch the new Rulebook website online in summer 2015. The current PRA Handbook sits alongside the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook, inherited from the Financial Services Authority.

View the PRA Rulebook.
 

View the additional parts to the PRA Rulebook.

Richard Taft was named as Deputy Comptroller for Credit Risk at the OCC, starting in May. As a principal advisor on credit risks facing the banking system, he will oversee the Commercial and Retail Credit Policy units.

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association published a document entitled “Path Forward for Centralized Execution of Swaps.” The Path Forward is a set of principles which aim to promote consistency between the regulatory rules adopted by different jurisdictions for the mandatory trading of derivatives on an exchange or electronic trading platform. ISDA is concerned that market fragmentation will continue and increase if US, European and other regulators do not reconcile their requirements. ISDA suggests that the US regulations are inconsistent with its principles and that changes need to be made to the US trade execution rules for a harmonized international regime to be achieved. The principles are: (i) the trading liquidity of a derivatives contract should be determined by reference to specific objective criteria; (ii) derivatives contracts that are subject to the trading obligation should be able to trade on a number of different types of centralized venues; and (iii) trading venues should offer flexible execution mechanisms that take into account the trading liquidity and unique characteristics of a particular category of swap.

View the Path Forward.

The European Banking Authority published its recommendations on the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes of third country supervisory authorities. Under the EU Capital Requirements Directive, third country supervisory authorities may participate in a college of supervisors set up for an international cross-border bank if: (i) it is considered appropriate for that authority to participate and (ii) the authority is subject to confidentiality requirements that are equivalent to those set out in the EU Capital Requirements Directive. The EBA’s recommendations only relate to the equivalence of the confidentiality regimes. The appropriateness issue is to be determined by each college of supervisors. The EBA recommends that the confidentiality regimes of the supervisory authorities in the following countries should be considered as equivalent to the CRD IV requirements: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, China, FYR Macedonia, Mexico, Montenegro, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey and the United States.
 

View the EBA Recommendation.

The European Securities and Markets Authority announced the launch of two centalized data projects relating to obligations under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the Market Abuse Regulation. The projects are:

• The Instrument Reference Data Project which will provide a central facility for instrument and trading data and the calculation of transparency and liquidity thresholds. This facility is expected to go live in early 2017.
• The Trade Repositories Project which will provide a single access point to trade repository data under EMIR. This data facility is expected to go live in 2016.

ESMA has agreed to develop the centralized data solutions following requests from EU national regulators. The projects will allow ESMA to collect data directly from trading venues and trade repositories and make that data publicly available through a centralized system.
 

View ESMA’s announcement.

The CFTC issued no-action relief, subject to specified conditions, to provisionally registered swap dealers from compliance with certain CFTC regulations. The regulations relate to business conduct standards with counterparties and swap trading relationship documentation when entering into swaps with certain special purpose vehicles (“SPVs”) in existence prior to October 10, 2013. Such swaps are referred to as “Legacy SPV Swaps” and the documentation governing the Legacy SPV Swaps are referred to as “Legacy SPV Swap Documentation.” As outlined in the request for the no-action relief, SPVs are entities established for very limited purposes and the permitted activities of SPVs, therefore, are significantly limited through covenants contained in their constitutive documents and transaction agreements. Since they are not operating entities, SPVs rely on third-party service providers to satisfy the SPV’s obligations under the Legacy SPV Swap Documentation and the various structured finance transaction agreements. As the specified CFTC regulations were not contemplated or addressed under the Legacy SPV Swap Documentation and related structured finance transaction agreements, there are consequent legal and practical impediments to third-party service providers taking the steps on behalf of SPVs that may be necessary to comply with the regulatory obligations set forth under the CFTC regulations.

In the no-action relief, the CFTC stated that no enforcement action would be taken against swap dealers for failure to comply with certain CFTC regulations as such regulations may apply to a Legacy SPV Swap.
 

View the CFTC Staff Letter 15-21.

The Bank of England announced that non-executive Prudential Regulation Authority board member, Iain Cornish, would be stepping down with immediate effect.

The Regulation of the European Central Bank on reporting of supervisory financial information was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulation sets out the requirements for significant and less significant banks to report supervisory financial information to their relevant national regulator. The Regulation applies to all banks that fall under the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as any branches of banks established outside of the SSM where the branch operates in a Eurozone Member State or another Member State that has opted into the SSM. The aim of the Regulation is to ensure that both significant and less significant firms report a common minimum set of information to national regulators, which will then be passed to the ECB. The Regulation came into effect on April 1, 2015.
 

View the Regulation.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the US Office of the Comptroller announced that Wells Fargo – one of the largest global systemically important financial institutions – will be permitted to use the “advanced approaches” capital framework to calculate and publicly disclose its risk-based capital requirements as of the second quarter of 2015. The US advanced approaches framework is available for the largest US banks following a trial or “parallel run” in which the bank proves its ability to meet disclosure requirements for the capital framework under the advanced approach method for four consecutive calendar years. Currently, seven other US banks use the advanced approaches framework. Previously, Wells Fargo used the standardized approach to calculate risk-based capital.

View the Federal Reserve Board press release.

A revised Global Preamble: Codes of Best Practice and Shared Global Principles was published by eight FX committees which sit in the major financial centres — Australia, Canada, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, London, New York, Singapore and Tokyo. FX market participants are expected to incorporate the guidance into their FX policies in a timely manner. The Global Preamble, last revised in 2013, covers standards of personal conduct, execution and dealing practices, confidentiality and market conduct.

View the revised Global Preamble.

The Bank of England published details of the 2015 stress test for the largest UK banks and building societies. The stress test, which aims to assess the resilience of banks and the banking system to severe shock, was agreed between the Financial Policy Committee and the Prudential Regulation Authority Board. It is not a variant to the EU stress test calibrated by the European Banking Authority, as was the case for the 2014 stress test. The European Banking Authority is not intending to undertake an EU-wide stress test this year. The results of the stress test will be announced in December 2015. If a firm’s capital or leverage ratios fall below the threshold in the test, it is likely that the PRA will require the firm to strengthen its capital position. The PRA may also require a firm whose ratios meet the threshold to strengthen its capital position after examining capital adequacy, recovery and resolution plans and the extent to which potentially significant risks are not quantified adequately as part of the stress. Any weakness detected in the banking system will be addressed by the FPC which has a variety of powers at its disposal, including recommendations to the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority.
 

View the stress test details.

The European Central Bank and the Bank of England published a joint press release announcing that they had agreed to enhanced information exchange and cooperation arrangements for UK CCPs with significant euro-denominated business. Further, both central banks are extending the scope of their standing swap line order to aid the provision of multi-currency liquidity support by both central banks to CCPs established in the UK and the euro area. As a result of the measures, the UK Government announced that it would withdraw the two as yet undecided cases brought by the UK Government against the ECB’s CCP location policy. The announcements follow the General Court judgment on March 4, 2015, which annulled the ECB’s Eurosystem Oversight Policy Framework which had the effect of requiring CCPs with significant euro-denominated business to be located within the eurozone. The ECB has not yet made any announcement about the documents which are the subject of the two cases to be withdrawn (Decision of 11 December 2012 on the terms and conditions of TARGET2 and the ECB’s Statement of Standards published on 18 November 2011 in so far as it sets out a location policy for CCPs).

View the ECB / BoE press release.

View the UK Government’s announcement.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York appointed Michael Strine first Vice President, effective July 1, 2015. The appointment was approved by the Federal Reserve Board.

Commission Delegated Regulations on the information to be provided by national regulators to the European Securities and Markets Authority on the passport for EU alternative investment fund managers managing or marketing EU alternative investment funds in the EU were published on March 27, 2015. Under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, ESMA is required to assess the functioning of the EU passport regime, the operating conditions for AIFs and their managers and the potential impact of an extension of the passport. The Regulations set out the information that national regulators will need to provide to ESMA, including the numbers of EU AIFMs authorized in their jurisdiction, problems relating to coordination between national regulators and cooperation arrangements with non-EU regulators, the effectiveness of the collection and sharing of information for monitoring systemic risk and the national regime for marketing of non-EU AIFs by EU AIFMs.

View the Regulations.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued a no-action letter to futures commission merchants, swap dealers and major swap participants that provides relief from certain requirements under CFTC Regulation 3.3(f). CFTC Regulation 3.3(f) requires FCMs, SDs and MSPs to submit to the CFTC annual reports by Chief Compliance Officers not more than 60 days after the end of their fiscal year. The relief grants FCMs, SDs and MSPs an additional 30 days to provide such annual reports to the CFTC. The relief will remain in effect until the adoption of a rule or rule amendment that modifies the timing requirements of CFTC Regulation 3.3(f)(2) and provides that the CFTC retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action relief provided, in its discretion.
 

CView FTC Staff Letter No. 15-15.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its final report and final draft technical standards on the assessment of acquisitions and increases in qualifying holdings in investment firms under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive I. The final draft technical standards comprise regulatory technical standards to establish an exhaustive list of information that an acquirer of an investment firm must provide to the relevant national regulator and implementing technical standards with standard forms, templates and procedures for cooperation and exchange of information between relevant national regulators. ESMA previously submitted draft RTS and ITS to the European Commission in December 2013. However, due to an amendment to legislation, those RTS need to be amended to cover information that the proposed acquirer must provide on the reputation and experience of any person who will direct the business of the investment firm after the proposed acquisition. The RTS and ITS published by ESMA on March 27, 2015 are the proposed revised RTS and ITS. Under MiFID II, which comes into effect on January 3, 2017, ESMA is required to prepare identical RTS and ITS and therefore ESMA considers that the revised RTS and ITS also satisfy its obligations under MiFID II.

View ESMA final report.

HM Treasury published a consultation paper on its proposed transposition of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II into UK law, including four draft statutory instruments. Member States are required to adopt measures transposing MiFID II by July 3, 2016 and to apply the provisions from January 3, 2017. In addition to the proposed statutory instruments, the FCA will also need to revise current rules and make new rules to transpose MiFID II. The proposed statutory instruments include provisions which create the position limit regime for commodity derivatives, make operating an organized trading facility a regulated activity, bring emission allowances, structured deposits and option and futures within the regulatory perimeter, provide for the exercise of the optional exemptions and transpose other exemptions and impose obligations on certain unauthorized firms in relation to algorithmic trading, provision of direct electronic access services and acting as a general clearing member of the CCP. The consultation closes on June 1, 2015. It is expected that the proposed legislation will be made in 2016.

View the consultation page.

The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC permanently changed the annual resolution plan or “living will” deadline for four non-bank systemically important financial institutions (“non-bank SIFIs”) from July 1 to December 31 beginning in 2016. The institutions include American International Group, Inc., General Electric Capital Corporation, Inc., MetLife Inc., and Prudential Financial, Inc. The agencies previously temporarily extended the 2015 living will deadlines for American International Group, General Electric Capital Corporation, and Prudential Financial to December 31, 2015. MetLife, recently designated as systemically important, is required to submit its first resolution plan by December 31, 2016.

Resolution plans are required by the Dodd-Frank Wall-Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for the largest financial institutions. Each living will must describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code in the event of material financial distress or failure of the company.

View the press release.

The Financial Conduct Authority published a discussion paper on its proposals for implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II conduct of business and organizational requirements. The paper sets out the policy choices available to the FCA in implementing some provisions of MiFID II including: (i) the application of MiFID II to insurance-based investment products and pensions; (ii) the best approach to implementing the extended application of MiFID II’s investor protection requirements to the sale of and advice on structured deposits; (iii) whether a ban on discretionary investment management firms accepting commissions and other deposits is appropriate for retail client business; (iv) changing the criteria for local authorities’ treatment as elective professional clients; (v) adopting the new requirements for independent advice on shares, bonds, derivatives and structured products; (vi) extending the MiFID II remuneration rules for conduct of business to non-MiFID firms; and (viii) amending the UK approach to recording telephone conversations and electronic communications. The FCA paper also highlights key conduct of business changes that firms will be required to comply with from January 3, 2017. In particular, the paper discusses types of third party inducements that firms will be able to receive and the classification of products as either non-complex or complex, relevant to the determination of whether the appropriateness test must be applied. The FCA consultation closes on May 26, 2015. The FCA intends to consult fully on implementing the MiFID II requirements in December 2015 and to publish its final rules in June 2016.

View the FCA discussion paper.

View an FCA implementation timetable.

The Financial Conduct Authority published proposed guidance on the application of ex-post risk adjustment to variable compensation (also known as performance adjustment). Ex-post risk adjustment is the adjustment of variable compensation to take into account a specific crystalized risk or adverse performance outcome and includes measures such as reducing current year awards, the application of malus and clawback. The proposed guidance is intended to amend and replace the guidance consulted on by the FCA in its joint consultation paper with the Prudential Regulation Authority on strengthening the alignment of risk and reward at the end of 2014. The revised proposed guidance will only apply to dual-regulated firms — banks, building societies and PRA-designated investments firms — and not to firms that are only regulated by the FCA, as was proposed in the 2014 consultation. The FCA notes that the revised proposed guidance may need to be amended depending on the outcome of the European Banking Authority's consultation on guidelines on sound compensation policies under the EU Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, known as CRD IV. Responses to the FCA's consultation are due by May 7, 2015. The FCA expects that the final revised proposed guidance will come into effect in summer 2015.
 

View the consultation paper.

The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that it is considering proposing rules that would require lenders to ensure that consumers can repay their loans. The proposals under consideration would also restrict lenders from attempting to collect payment from consumers’ bank accounts in ways that pile up excessive fees. The consumer protections being considered would apply to payday loans, vehicle title loans, deposit advance products and certain high-cost installment loans and open-end loans. The CFPB published an outline of the proposals under consideration in preparation for convening a Small Business Review Panel to gather feedback from small lenders, which is the next step in the rulemaking process.

View a fact sheet summarizing the proposals under consideration.

View an outline of the proposals under consideration.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule amendments to require broker- dealers trading in off-exchange venues to become members of a national securities association. The amendments would seek to heighten regulatory oversight of active proprietary trading firms. The proposed amendments to Rule 15b9-1 under the Exchange Act of 1934 would narrow the current exemption available to certain broker-dealers from membership of a national securities association if the broker-dealer is a member of a national securities exchange, carries no customer accounts and has annual gross income of no more than $1,000 that is derived from securities transactions effected otherwise than on a national securities exchange of which it is a member. The exemption was originally tailored to exchange specialists and other floor members that might need to utilize limited hedging or other off-exchange activities secondary to their floor-based business. The proposed amendments would also update the exemption that permits off-exchange transactions necessary to comply with the regulatory requirements preventing trade-throughs. The public comment period on the proposed rule amendment will last 60 days following its publication in the Federal Register.
 

View the proposed rule.

The SEC adopted final rules to allow smaller companies better access to capital and provide investors with more investment choices. The new rules update and expand Regulation A, an existing exemption from registration for smaller issuers of securities and will enable smaller companies to offer and sell up to $50 million of securities in a 12-month period, subject to eligibility, disclosure and reporting requirements. The rules are mandated by Title IV of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act and will attempt to provide investors with more investment choices, especially among smaller companies. The rules will be effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

View the Final Rules.

The UK Payment Systems Regulator published the regulatory framework for payment systems in the UK which sets out the PSR’s approach to regulation of payment systems and related industry, work programme regulatory tools and guiding principles. The new PSR is fully operational as of April 1, 2015. Two market reviews were announced alongside the publication of the regulatory framework. The first review is into the ownership and competitiveness of payment systems infrastructure which will look into the ownership of a small number of banks of both BACS, Faster Payments Services and LINK payment systems and the central infrastructure for those systems, VocalLink. The second review is into the supply of indirect access to payment systems which is provided only by Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and RBS. The PSR is seeking comments on the scope of the reviews with a view to finalizing the terms of reference for each review by the end of May at which time more detailed timetables will be available.

View the regulatory framework.

UK legislation was enacted which gives the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee power to issue directions to the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority for certain macro-prudential measures. The FPC will be able to give a direction to (i) specify a minimum leverage ratio for UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms; (ii) require UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms for which the PRA sets a strategic risk buffer to also maintain an additional leverage ratio specified by the FPC; (iii) require globally systemically important institutions to hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy an additional leverage ratio specified by the FPC; and (iv) require UK banks and PRA-designated UK investment firms to hold sufficient capital to maintain a countercyclical leverage buffer. The legislation comes into force on April 6, 2015, except for the power of direction for firms required to hold a strategic risk buffer which comes into force on January 1, 2019.

View the legislation.

The Single Resolution Board announced its priorities for 2015 following its first plenary meeting. The SRB is part of the Single Resolution Mechanism in the Eurozone and will have the powers of a resolution authority under the Banking Recovery and Resolution Directive. The SRM is part of the Banking Union and therefore the SRB will only have powers over Eurozone banks or banks in those Member States that opt into the Banking Union. The SRB’s priorities in 2015 will be to (i) establish cooperation with key stakeholders and international partners; (ii) set standards for credible resolution plans; and (iii) focus on resolution planning, including at an international level, to address obstacles to resolution. The SRB will have full powers by 2016 to carry out its resolution powers.

View the SRB announcement.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published its revised Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies as part of a report on the issue. IOSCO consulted in 2012 on revisions to the Code to take into account the number of credit rating agencies that have become subject to supervision by national or regional authorities since the recent financial crisis. The updated Code (i) aims to enhance provisions on protecting the integrity of the credit rating process, managing conflicts of interest, providing transparency and safeguarding non-public information; (ii) adds measures on governance, training and risk management; and (iii) adds new definitions for key terms and revising existing definitions and terminology. The revised Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies is intended to synchronize with the national and regional frameworks for supervision and oversight of credit rating agencies whilst remaining the international standard for credit rating agency self-governance.
 

View the revised Code.

A Commission Delegated Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Journal, which amends the Delegated Regulation on own funds requirements for investment firms based on fixed overheads. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation certain investment firms are able to use an alternative method based on a quarter of their fixed costs to calculate their total capital requirement. The amending Regulations insert into the Delegated Regulation the methodology for investment firms to calculate fixed overheads. The amending Regulations come into force on April 14, 2015.
 

View the amending Regulations.

The Financial Conduct Authority published its business plan for 2015/2016 which indicates upcoming focus areas for the regulator and announces upcoming priorities. Key issues include: (i) conflicts of interest in dark pools; (ii) investor charges in asset management; (iii) the wholesale market study into competition in investment and corporate banking; (iv) poor culture and controls which threaten market integrity; and (v) systems and controls for financial crime.
 

View the FCA business plan.

The European Securities and Markets Authority launched a consultation on proposed guidelines for the assessment of whether debt instruments and structured deposits are complex or not. Under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, investment firms are able to provide reception, transmission and execution of orders for clients without carrying out the appropriateness test subject to certain conditions being met, including that the services do not relate to financial instruments that are (i) bonds, other forms of securitized debt and money market instruments incorporating a structure which makes it difficult for a client to understand the risk involved; or (ii) structured deposits incorporating a structure which makes it difficult for a client to understand the risk or return or the cost of exiting the product before term. ESMA is required to develop, by January 3, 2016, guidelines for the assessment of such instruments to help firms and national regulators classify correctly MiFID debt instruments and structured deposits as either complex or non-complex.

View ESMA’s consultation paper.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced the completion of reviews of annual resolution plans or “living wills” submitted in 2014 by three foreign banking organizations and gave feedback letters to each bank. The FBOs included BNP Paribas, HSBC Holdings plc and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.

The FDIC announced that the living wills were “not credible” and that 2015 plans would be required to demonstrate significant progress. Common shortcomings identified across the FBOs included: (i) unrealistic assumptions about behavior of various parties (i.e., customers, counterparties, investors, or regulators); and (ii) insufficient analysis on the inter-connectedness between banks. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC will expect that the annual plans submitted by the three banks on or before December 31, 2015, demonstrate that the banks are making significant progress to address the shortcomings identified, and are taking actions to improve their resolvability under the US Bankruptcy Code.

View the press release.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published its policy statement and first set of final rules on strengthening individual accountability in banking and insurance. The policy statement implements the new Senior Managers Regime and Certification Regime for UK banks and certain investment firms as well as the Senior Insurance Managers Regime under Solvency II. The new SMR is created to support a change in culture for individuals who are subject to regulatory approval and requires firms to assign a variety of responsibilities to those individuals as well as assess their fitness and propriety regularly. The new Certification Regime will require relevant firms to assess the fitness and propriety of certain individuals of the firm who could cause significant harm to the institution or its customers. The rules include the Prescribed Responsibilities of Senior Managers and the scope of the PRA’s Certification Regime. Separately, the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority are jointly consulting on proposed plans for extending and tailoring the SMR, Certification Regime and Conduct Rules to UK branches of non-EEA institutions, and this consultation is open until May 25, 2015. The new Senior Managers and Certification Regime will apply from March 7, 2016.

View the policy statement

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a final report including guidelines on the periodic information that is to be submitted by Credit Rating Agencies to ESMA in the context of ESMA’s ongoing supervision. The guidelines detail the kind of information that CRAs should regularly submit to ESMA on a quarterly, semi-annual and annual basis, so that ESMA can carry out its ongoing supervision of CRAs consistently. This includes information related to: (i) financial revenues and costs; (ii) staff turnover, vacancies and key promotions; and (iii) board minutes, court, arbitration and other dispute resolution proceedings. The guidelines will enter into force two months after they have been published on ESMA’s website.

View the guidelines

The UK Government published a report on managing and mitigating cyber security risks with cyber insurance. The report details how insurers and insurance can play a role in reducing cyber security risks. The report notes that there is a lack of awareness that insurance is available for cyber risk and recommends that firms review their cyber risk management to include a board-level assessment for cyber risk, and draw up recovery plans and use stress testing to confirm financial resilience against cyber threats. The report also gives details of its new industry supported scheme, Cyber Essentials, which was developed as part of the UK’s National Cyber Security Program and guides businesses in protecting themselves against cyber threats.

View the report

The Code of Conduct for the Members of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The code includes the basic principles that members of the board are to abide by, as well as rules on conflicts of interest, private financial transactions and wealth declarations. This follows on from the ECB’s new prudential supervisory role for banks in the Eurozone under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB assumed this new role in November 2014, and the SSM creates a new system of financial supervision, under which the ECB directly supervises 120 significant banking groups, and sets and monitors supervisory standards for other Eurozone banks by working more closely with national regulators. The code entered into force on March 21, 2015.

View the code of conduct

HM Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority issued a joint consultation on the Implementation of the Transparency Amending Directive that entered into force on November 26, 2013 and which amends the Transparency Directive, the Transparency Directive Implementing Directive and the Prospectus Directive. The directives aim to harmonize the information disclosure requirements of companies, and the consultation sets out the proposed amendments to be implemented by HM Treasury to the Financial Services and Markets Act and by the FCA to the FCA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules, including: (i) the extension of the deadline to publish half-yearly reports and the period of time for which financial reports are publicly available; and (ii) changes to the definition of an issuer. The Transparency Amending Directive must be implemented by EU Member States before November 26, 2015. Comments on the consultation may be submitted until May 20, 2015.

View the consultation paper

The European Securities and Markets Authority issued a call for evidence on the disclosure obligations required for Structured Finance Instruments under the Credit Ratings Agency Regulations and extending those requirements to private and bilateral SFI transactions. The call for evidence seeks to gather information on whether ESMA should make a distinction between private and bilateral transactions when considering the extension of the requirements, and if so, how the two terms should be defined. ESMA will then seek to ascertain whether the disclosure requirements can be used in their entirety for both private and bilateral SFI transactions or whether any additional issues should be taken into account to adapt the requirements to each type of transaction. An extension of the disclosure requirements would then be phased in for private and bilateral transactions. ESMA will analyze the evidence it has received to revise the current Regulatory Technical Standards under the Credit Ratings Agency Regulations. Comments on the consultation may be submitted until May 20, 2015.

View the call for evidence

The Department for Business Innovation & Skills published guidance for employers and prescribed persons regarding whistleblowing. The documents lay out various policies and procedures for employers regarding whistleblowing. A prescribed person is an organization or individual that a worker may approach outside their workplace to report suspected or known wrongdoing. The Prescribed Persons Order 2014 sets out a list of over 60 such organizations and individuals that have been designated as prescribed persons because they have an authoritative or oversight relationship with the sector, often as a regulatory body.

View the guidance for employers and the code of practice

View the guidance for prescribed persons

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation and published draft guidelines on setting limits on exposures to shadow banking entities which carry out activities outside of the regulated framework under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The guidelines set out the approaches that institutions should take to develop internal policies for monitoring and setting limits on individual and aggregate levels. The Principal Approach and the Fallback Approach for setting limits on exposures are set out in the guidelines. The Principal Approach proposes that institutions set an aggregate limit to exposures to the shadow banking sector in relation to the institution’s eligible capital. If an institution is not able to apply the Principal Approach, due to, for example, holding insufficient information about the activities of shadow banking entities, the Fallback Approach should be used which would mean that a limit of 25% of the institution’s eligible capital would be applied to its aggregate exposures to shadow banking entities. In addition, institutions would set tighter limits to individual exposures and should take into account matters such as the financial situation and regulatory status of the shadow banking entity, and whether the entity is vulnerable to asset price or credit quality volatility. The draft guidelines also set out the proposed definitions that are to be used for terms that have not been defined or sufficiently defined in the CRR, such as “shadow banking entities”, “exposures to shadow banking entities”, “excluded undertakings” and “credit intermediation activities.” Comments on the consultation may be submitted until June 19, 2015.

View the consultation paper and guidelines

The Comptroller of the Currency discussed the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s approach to adapting regulatory and supervisory expectations to the size and complexity of supervised institutions. His remarks were part of testimony before the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. His testimony provides a brief overview of the key provisions of Section 165 of Dodd-Frank Act as they apply to bank holding companies and how the OCC’s supervisory and regulatory tools complement and support the objectives of these provisions. He also describes that the OCC has tailored its supervisory programs into three distinct portfolios—community banks, midsize banks, and large banks.

View the oral statement

View the written testimony

HM Treasury published a report detailing the outcome of its consultation on the criteria for the designation of payments for oversight by the Payment Systems Regulator. HM Treasury is responsible for designating the payment systems that will be subject to regulation and proposals in its consultation suggested the designation of seven payment systems: Bacs, CHAPS, Faster Payment Service, LINK, Cheque and Credit Clearing, Northern Ireland Cheque Clearing, MasterCard and Visa. HM Treasury confirms in its outcome report that only those seven payment systems will be subject to regulation at this stage.

View the report

The International Organization of Securities Commissions and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a revised version of their policy framework regarding minimum standards for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. The new framework contains several substantive changes from the previous policy framework published by the Basel Committee and IOSCO in September 2013. The framework consists of key principles aimed to ensure harmonization across jurisdictions. The requirements apply to financial firms and systemically important non-financial entities (“covered entities”), the definitions for which are left to national regulation. The Basel Committee and IOSCO have no power to impose any mandatory requirements on regulatory authorities, but rather serve as a reference for national regulators as they adopt their respective margin regimes. The main revisions pertain to the phase in period for posting and collecting initial margin which has been delayed from December 1, 2015 to September 1, 2016. Additionally, the phase-in period for required variation margin, originally set to begin on December 1, 2015, will now begin on September 1, 2016 for covered entities belonging to a group whose aggregate month-end average notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives exceeds €3 trillion and March 1, 2017 for all other covered entities. There has currently been no formal statement from US or EU regulatory authorities regarding delay to implementation.

View the revised policy framework

View the summary of key revisions to the September 2013 policy framework