Following its consultation in February 2018, the Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement and final new Supervisory Statement on Algorithmic Trading. The Supervisory Statement sets out the PRA's supervisory expectations of firms in relation to their algorithmic trading activities and covers: (i) governance; (ii) a firm's algorithmic approval process; (iii) testing and deployment; (iv) inventories and documentation; and (v) risk management and other systems and controls functions.

The Supervisory Statement applies to firms that engage in algorithmic trading and that are subject to the PRA's rules on algorithmic trading as well as the Regulatory Technical Standards on the organizational requirements of investment firms engaged in algorithmic trading (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/589) under the Markets in Financial Instruments package. The Supervisory Statement applies to all of a firm's algorithmic trading activities, including those related to unregulated financial instruments.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has adopted two Decisions on the provision of Contracts for Difference and binary options to retail investors. The effect of the Decisions is to prohibit the marketing, distribution and sale of binary options to retail investors and to impose a number of restrictions on the marketing, distribution and sale of Contracts for Difference to retail investors. Both CFDs and binary options are considered to have given rise to significant investor protection concerns, due to their complexity, the lack of transparent information at the point of sale, the risk of significant loss for investors and the deployment of aggressive marketing techniques by providers and distributors of the products.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority have published a joint statement on the treatment of retail holdings of debt financial instruments under the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The EBA and ESMA highlight that care is needed when bail-in is implemented in relation to debt liabilities held by retail customers. There have been a number of mis-selling cases as a result of firms not complying with the investor protection requirements at the point of sale of banks' debt liabilities to retail investors.

The EBA and ESMA emphasize that to ensure that debt instruments are distributed to clients for whom they are suitable, firms must properly implement the MiFID II investor protection requirements. Those requirements oblige firms to, among other things, act honestly, fairly, professionally and in the best interests of clients, disclose certain information to potential and existing clients and conduct suitability assessments. In addition, the product governance framework requires manufacturers and distributors of financial products to act in the client's best interests at all stages of the life-cycle of products or services. In particular, firms must identify the target market for complex products to a greater level of detail than other products. Instruments subject to bail-in must be classified as complex products.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a Final Report setting out finalized Guidelines on aspects of the suitability requirements under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. ESMA consulted previously on a draft version of the Guidelines between July and October 2017.

The finalized Guidelines largely confirm ESMA's previous 2012 guidelines on MiFID I, but have a broader scope and ESMA has added clarifications and refinements where necessary.

Read more.

The European Commission has published a proposal for a Regulation to amend the Market Abuse Regulation and the new Prospectus Regulation. The aim of the proposed Regulation is to promote the use of SME Growth Markets by making technical adjustments to the MAR and the new PR to make the regulatory framework applying to listed Small and Medium-sized Enterprises more proportionate and to foster the liquidity of equity instruments listed on SME Growth Markets, while maintaining a high level of investor protection and market integrity. The proposed Regulation is in line with the objectives of the EU Capital Markets Union of reducing the overreliance on bank funding and diversifying market-based sources of financing for European companies.

SME Growth Markets are a new sub-category of multilateral trading facility introduced by the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in January 2018. Companies listed on an SME Growth Market are required to comply with MAR and the PR and are impacted by some aspects of MiFID II. The adjustments in the proposal for a Regulation are designed to lower the administrative burden and costs for issuers on SME Growth Markets stemming from compliance with MAR and the PR and to address regulatory shortcomings in MAR that can affect the liquidity of SME financial instruments. The European Commission has also published a separate proposal for a regulation amending delegated legislation under MiFID II to address regulatory barriers to the take-up of the SME Growth Markets.

Read more.

The European Commission has published for consultation a draft Delegated Regulation on registration conditions to promote the use of SME Growth Markets for the purposes of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. MiFID II introduced SME Growth Markets as a new sub-category of multilateral trading facility in January 2018 to facilitate access to capital for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. The proposed delegated regulation will amend existing delegated legislation under MiFID II to address regulatory barriers to the take-up of SME Growth Markets. The European Commission has also published separately a legislative proposal to make adjustments to the Market Abuse Regulation and the Prospectus Regulation is to promote the use of SME Growth Markets.

Read more.

The European Commission has published a package of legislative reforms on sustainable finance. The aim of the package of reforms, which form part of the Commission's broader Capital Markets Union initiative, is to ensure that environmental, social and governance considerations are consistently integrated into the investment and advisory process across sectors. The proposed measures comprise:

(i) a proposed Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment. This will establish an EU-wide classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities and ensure that investment strategies are oriented towards economic activities that genuinely contribute to achieving environmental objectives. The proposed Regulation will empower the European Commission to adopt delegated acts to specify technical screening criteria to assess the contribution of a given economic activity to a particular environmental objective as substantial. A list of six environmental objectives is set out in the proposed regulation, namely: climate change mitigation; climate change adaptation; sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; transition to a circular economy, waste prevention and recycling; pollution prevention and control; and protection of healthy ecosystems (which includes biodiversity conservation).

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a letter from its Chair, Steven Maijoor, to the European Commission seeking clarification on how to interpret the ancillary activity exemption under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.

MiFID II exempts non-financial entities that deal on own account, or provide investment services to clients, in commodity derivatives from having to obtain authorization as an investment firm under MiFID II provided that, among other things, this activity is ancillary to their main business. The provisions of MiFID II are supplemented by a Commission Delegated Regulation setting out the Regulatory Technical Standard on the criteria to establish when an activity is considered to be ancillary to the main business. The wording of both MiFID II and the RTS suggest that the tests for whether activity is ancillary should be carried out at the level of the entity's group. However, some drafting amendments that were introduced by the Commission have led to uncertainty as to whether the tests should be carried out at the level of the entity rather than at group level.

ESMA states that it would not be appropriate for it to address this uncertainty through its usual Questions and Answers and invites the Commission to provide further guidance on the interpretation and implementation of the ancillary activity criteria, in particular on the level at which the tests should be applied.

View the ESMA letter.

View the Commission Delegated Regulation (2017/592).

The Financial Conduct Authority has published its Business Plan for 2018/19 which sets out its key priorities for the coming year. The FCA confirms that it will continue to focus on issues relating to the U.K.'s withdrawal from the EU by working with the Government, ensuring appropriate transition measures for EEA firms, working towards operational readiness and cooperating at international level.

The FCA divides the remainder of its priorities into cross-sector priorities and sector priorities. There are seven cross-sector priorities: firms' culture and governance; financial crime and anti-money laundering; data security, resilience and outsourcing; innovation, big data, technology and competition; treatment of existing customers; long-term savings, pensions and intergenerational differences; and high-cost credit. There are seven sector priority areas: wholesale financial markets; investment management; retail lending; pensions and retirement income; retail investments; retail banking; and general insurance and protection. The FCA also published Sector Views for each of these sectors which provide an FCA view of how each sector was performing as of mid-2017.

Read more. 

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a statement confirming the regulatory requirements applicable to firms engaged in cryptocurrency derivatives. The FCA does not regulate cryptocurrencies, provided that they do not form part of other regulated services or products. However, the FCA states that cryptocurrency derivatives may be categorized as financial instruments under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II and that firms carrying out regulated activities in cryptocurrency derivatives should comply with the FCA's Handbook rules as well as the directly applicable EU provisions. The FCA points out that dealing in, arranging transactions in, advising on or providing other services that are regulated activities in relation to derivatives that reference cryptocurrencies or tokens issued through an Initial Coin Offering will require FCA authorization.

View the FCA's statement.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions has published a final report on regulatory reporting and public transparency in the secondary corporate bond markets. The report discusses the importance to robust capital markets of making information accessible to regulators and the public via regulatory reporting requirements and pre- and post-trade transparency requirements respectively. The report discusses the approach taken in various jurisdictions to impose these requirements before setting out seven recommendations for national regulators.

The recommendations update IOSCO's 2004 report, "Transparency of Corporate Bond Markets," which discussed the then-existing transparency arrangements for corporate bond markets, as well as the regulatory regimes that were in place in member jurisdictions and set out Core Measures for national regulators to consider to ensure adequate transparency and regulatory reporting arrangements. The recommendations also take into account IOSCO's 2017 report, "Examination of the Liquidity of the Secondary Corporate Bond Markets," which set out the findings of an evidence-based examination of the state of secondary corporate bond markets from 2004 until approximately 2015 and provided a detailed overview and discussion of the markets and how they had evolved since 2004.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has confirmed that it will use its product intervention powers under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation to prohibit the marketing, distribution and sale of binary options to retail investors. It will also impose a number of restrictions on the marketing, distribution and sale of Contracts for Difference to retail investors. Both CFDs and binary options have given rise to significant investor protection concerns, due to their complexity, the lack of transparent information at the point of sale, the risk of significant loss for investors and the deployment of aggressive marketing techniques by providers and distributors of the products.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a final report and final draft amending Regulatory Technical Standards to amend the RTS on the equity transparency obligations of trading venues and investment firms (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587, known as RTS 1). The Markets for Financial Instruments Regulation requires Systematic Internalisers to make public firm quotes in equity instruments. The quotes must: (i) be at least equivalent of 10% of the standard market size for the quoted instrument; (ii) include both a bid and offer price; and (iii) reflect the prevailing market conditions for that instrument. RTS 1 specifies the concept of "prices reflecting prevailing market conditions" as being "close in price, at the time of publication, to quotes of equivalent sizes for the same financial instrument on the most relevant market in terms of liquidity".

ESMA considers that this concept needs to be further elaborated and consulted on proposed amendments last year. ESMA has not made any changes to its proposal.  The final draft amending RTS provide that the quotes of an SI can only adequately reflect prevailing market conditions when the quotes reflect the minimum price increments ('tick sizes') quoted for a financial instrument on a trading venue.

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published an Opinion on the treatment of package orders in the context of the trading obligation for derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The trading obligation requires that the trading of certain derivatives must take place on a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, organised trading facility or on an equivalent third-country trading venue.

Package orders are used by investment firms and their clients to conduct trades for risk management and hedging purposes. They are composed of two or more financial instruments that are priced as a single unit. The execution of each component is simultaneous and contingent upon on the execution of all the other components. Under MiFIR, the trading obligation is designed to apply at instrument level, not package level – the obligation attaches to the components of a package, but not to the package as a whole. Difficulties may arise where a package order contains a mixture of instruments, where some are subject to the trading obligation while others are not. ESMA considers that the components of a package need to be executed on a trading venue only where it is feasible to do so without creating undue operational or execution risk.

Read more.

The European Commission has published a proposed Regulation on European Crowdfunding Service Providers for Business. The proposed ECSP Regulation is part of the EU Capital Markets Union initiative and the Commission's FinTech Action Plan. It aims to increase access to finance through crowdfunding for innovative companies, start-ups and SMEs.

The Commission is seeking to introduce an "EU label for crowdfunding service providers" which would be authorized and supervised by the European Securities and Markets Authority and able to passport their services across the EU. Currently, different EU Member States apply different levels of regulatory requirements to CSPs. Some Member States require CSPs to comply with onerous obligations under the Markets in Financial Instruments package, some apply more lenient regimes, while others allow CSPs to benefit from exemptions and remain unregulated. The Commission's view is that this divergence hampers the potential scaling-up of crowdfunding activity, because CSPs need to comply with different legal and regulatory requirements and adjust their business models accordingly if they want to provide services in more than one EU Member State. The Commission is not proposing that current national frameworks be repealed. Instead, those frameworks can continue to exist, which will allow CSPs to choose to either provide or continue providing services on a domestic basis under national laws or to provide services under the proposed ECSP Regulation. However, the Commission is proposing that the MiFID II Directive be amended to exclude CSPs from its obligations.

Read more. 

The European Commission has published a Communication on completing the Capital Markets Union by 2019. The Communication confirms the Commissions commitment to completing the CMU by mid-2019 and announces the publication of the FinTech Action Plan, including a proposed Regulation on Crowdfunding, and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan. Legislative proposals on covered bonds, the cross-border distribution of collective investment funds and the law applicable to third-party effects of assignment are expected to be published on March 12, 2018. In May 2018, the Commission intends to publish a proposed Directive on credit servicers, credit purchasers and the recovery of collateral as well as impact assessments on the SME listing regime and the resolution of investment disputes.

The Commission states that completion of the CMU is more urgent due to the impending exit by the UK from the EU because the UK is currently the EUs largest financial centre. The Commission notes that an effective CMU will need to "open-up markets to give better access to finance for EU businesses and more and innovative investment opportunities for savers." 

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published on its website trading volumes and calculations for the purposes of the Double Volume Cap under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The published data covers the periods January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2018.

The DVC has been introduced under MiFIR as a measure to limit the amount of dark pool trading, which can harm price formation in equity markets. The DVC places a cap on the volume of equities trading using two of the available waivers from the pre-trade transparency obligations of the MiFIR, namely the negotiated transaction waiver and the reference price waiver. The double cap comprises a per-venue cap of 4% of the total volume of trading in a particular financial instrument on all EU trading venues across over the previous 12 months and an EU-wide cap of 8%. ESMA is required to publish reports on the volume of trades that have relied on the waivers.  National regulators must suspend, for six months, trading under the waivers that exceeds either of the caps.

The publication of the data follows a delay announced by ESMA in January 2018 due to issues with the quality and completeness of data that had been submitted.

View the ESMA press release.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions has launched a consultation on proposed recommendations for trading venues and their regulators to consider when implementing, operating and monitoring volatility control mechanisms to preserve orderly trading. The consultation supports IOSCO’s objective of ensuring that markets are fair, efficient and transparent and focuses on automatic volatility interruptions and mechanisms to halt trading or reject orders.

Read more.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority have published co-ordinated papers on their expectations around firms' use of algorithmic trading strategies in wholesale markets. Firms have had to comply, since January 3, 2018, with new requirements introduced by the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and related Regulatory Technical Standards. The FCA's paper sets out the applicable regulatory requirements and provides examples of good and poor practice for firms regulated by the FCA. Firms that are dual-regulated by the FCA and the PRA should also review the PRA paper, which takes the form of a formal consultation on a proposed Supervisory Statement, covering the PRA's expectations regarding firms' governance and risk management. The PRA consultation runs until May 7, 2018.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published its Supervisory Convergence Work Programme for 2018. It highlights a total of five key priorities for its work on supervisory convergence in 2018, comprised of three ongoing priorities (application of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments framework, data quality and investor protection) and two new priorities (Brexit and financial innovation).

In addition to the key priorities, the 2018 programme also sets out ESMA key objectives and main planned outputs in relation to a number of thematic and cross-cutting issues, including: investor protection and intermediaries; secondary markets; investment management; market integrity (including market abuse and benchmarks); post-trading (including CCPs, securities financing and settlement); corporate finance (in particular the new prospectus regime); corporate reporting; market data; financial innovation; IT infrastructure; and peer reviews.

Read more.
 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has issued a call for evidence on the possible use of its product intervention powers under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation to impose restrictions and/or prohibitions on the marketing, distribution and sale of contracts for difference and binary options to retail investors.

Read more.

A Commission Delegated Regulation amending the Regulatory Technical Standards on authorization, organizational requirements and the publication of transactions for data reporting services providers under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

MiFID II requires consolidated tape providers to collect post-trade information published by trading venues and approved publication arrangements and to consolidate this into a continuous live data stream made available to the public, both for equity instruments and non-equity products.

The amending Regulation adds provisions to the existing RTS to set out the scope of the consolidated tape for non-equity products (i.e., bonds, structured finance products, emission allowances and derivatives). In particular, the amending Regulation:

•  permits non-equity CTPs to specialize in one or more asset classes to increase the likelihood of a viable business case for non-equity consolidated tape provision;

•  specifies the APAs and trading venues that have to be included in the non-equity consolidated tape, based on the required consolidated tape coverage ratio of 80% of all transactions published in an asset class in the EU; and

•  requires CTPs to reach minimum coverage ratios by January 1, 2019.

The amending Regulation applied from January 3, 2018. However, the provisions relating to CTPs will apply from September 3, 2019. The amending Regulation does not differ substantively from the final draft RTS submitted to the European Commission on March 31, 2017.

View the amending Regulation.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a "Dear CEO" letter that was sent to firms that offer contracts for difference products to retail customers on either an advisory or discretionary portfolio management basis (including pursuant to limited power of attorney). The "Dear CEO" letter follows a review conducted by the FCA which assessed internal processes, policies, controls and oversight arrangements at a sample of 19 providers and 15 distributors of CFD products to retail customers. The "Dear CEO" letter identifies a number of areas of concern: target market identification and alignment of the target market to the characteristics of the product; communication, oversight and challenge; the process for taking on new distributors; management of conflicts of interest; the use of management information and key performance indicators; client categorisation; and remuneration arrangements.

The FCA considers that there is a high risk that firms across the sector are not meeting its rules and expectations when providing and distributing CFDs and that consumers are likely to experience poor outcomes unless these poor practices are addressed. The letter highlights the need for firms overall to improve a number of oversight and control arrangements to reach the standard required by FCA rules and guidance. The FCA will conduct further work on CFDs and firms may be asked to take part in a follow-up review to assess how they have responded to the feedback in the Dear CEO letter. The FCA will also be assessing firms' compliance with the new Product Intervention and Product Governance sourcebook, which came into effect on January 3, 2018, implementing as rules the product governance requirements of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.

View the "Dear CEO" letter.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has announced that it will delay the publication of data for January 2018 on the double volume cap mechanism introduced by the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation from January 3, 2018. The DVC mechanism introduced by MiFIR seeks to ensure that dark pool trading using waivers from pre-trade transparency requirements does not unduly harm price formation. It does so by capping the amount of trading for orders placed in systems which are based on a trading methodology using the reference price waiver and certain transactions using the negotiated price waiver.

ESMA expects to work with national regulators and trading venues to address issues it has identified with the quality and completeness of the data it has so far received from trading venues. It hopes to publish the data in March 2018.

View the press release.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a list of trading venues exempt from the open access requirements of the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation under transitional arrangements for exchange-traded derivatives under the "de minimis" principle. Various national regulators have also delayed the coming into effect of the open access requirements of MiFID II for clearing houses.

MiFIR requires a trading venue to provide open and non-discriminatory access to a CCP so that a CCP can clear trades concluded on a trading venue of their choice, which will in turn allow the members of a trading venue to select the CCP they wish to use for clearing. There is a reciprocal requirement on CCPs to provide open and non-discriminatory access to a trading venue that wishes to clear financial instruments through a particular CCP. These provisions are controversial since they mean that valuable intellectual property and IT systems developed by exchanges effectively must be made available to competitors or new market entrants. It has been argued that the open access requirements make the EU unattractive as a location for exchange businesses due to commercial disadvantages that result for those exchanges which have successfully invested in innovation.

MiFIR provides for a transitional opt-out from the open access requirements for trading venues and clearing houses in relation to ETDs provided that certain criteria are met. ESMA's list specifies four trading venues from Spain, Poland, Norway and Greece that have had their application for exemption approved and one from Sweden whose approval is pending. The four trading venues - MEFF Sociedad Rectora del Mercado de Productos Derivados S.A.U., Giełda Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie S.A., Oslo Børs ASA and Athens Exchange S.A. - are exempt from the MiFIR open access requirements until July 3, 2020.

Read more. 

A Commission Delegated Regulation on the derivatives trading obligation under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The trading obligation is applicable to classes of derivatives that: (i) have been declared subject to the clearing obligation under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, (ii) are admitted to trading or traded on at least one EU trading venue (a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, organized trading facility or a third country equivalent trading venue) and (iii) are sufficiently liquid. The trading obligation applies to financial counterparties and to non-financial counterparties. Where a class of derivatives is determined to be subject to the MiFIR trading obligation, such derivative may only be traded on a third country trading venues if it has been determined to be equivalent by the European Commission.

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a statement in response to indications that not all investment firms will succeed in obtaining Legal Entity Identifier codes from all their clients that are legal persons ahead January 3, 2018 when the Markets in Financial Instrument Regulation takes effect. There is also concern that trading venues may not obtain LEI codes for non-EU issuers in time.

Under MiFIR, investment firms are required to identify all clients that are legal persons with an LEI code. An investment firm is acquired to obtain the LEI code of a client prior to providing any service that triggers the obligation to submit a transaction report for a transaction entered into on behalf of a client who is eligible for the LEI code. Trading venues must also identify each issuer of a financial instrument traded on their systems with an LEI code when making daily submissions to the Financial Instruments Reference Data System.

Read more.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2382 has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will take effect on January 3, 2018.

The Implementing Regulation contains Implementing Technical Standards on the standard forms and templates that should be used for notifications and the procedures for the transmission of information when investment firms, market operators operating a multilateral trading facility or organised trading facility, and, where required by the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, credit institutions, want passport investment services or perform activities in another Member State.

View the Implementing Regulation.

The European Commission has adopted an Implementing Decision declaring the two Swiss stock exchanges equivalent for the purpose of the shares trading obligation under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. MiFIR requires EU investment firms to ensure that the trades they undertake in shares admitted to trading on a regulated market or traded on a trading venue take place on a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, systematic internaliser or equivalent third-country trading venue.

The legal and supervisory framework of SIX Swiss Exchange AG and BX Swiss AG have been assesses as equivalent to the requirements of MiFIR, the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, the Market Abuse Regulation and the Transparency Directive.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a revised procedure and a harmonized template to be used by national regulators in reporting to ESMA the parameters to halt or constrain trading used by the trading venues under their jurisdiction. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive places obligations on national regulators to require a regulated market in their jurisdiction to be able to temporarily halt or constrain trading if there is significant price movement in a financial instrument on that market or a related market during a short period and, in exceptional cases, to be able to cancel, vary or correct any transaction. The regulated market must report the parameters for halting trading and any material changes to those parameters to the national regulator and the national regulator must in turn report them to ESMA.

The ESMA procedure and template is designed to establish a common format for national regulators to use for the reports they make to ESMA. However, national regulators can, if they wish, require trading venues to report to them the parameters using a different and/or more granular format.

Read more.

The European Commission has published a consultation paper in which it seeks views on the main challenges for SME-dedicated markets and possible changes to EU legislation that might help build the EU high-growth SME markets. The consultation paper follows previous consultations and papers relating to the Capital Markets Union Action Plan.

The consultation focuses on SME Growth Markets, a new type of trading venue introduced under the Markets in Financial Instruments package. The consultation paper is split into two sections, the first of which considers the main drivers behind the downward trend of SME initial public offerings and bond issuances. The second section considers specific regulatory barriers to SME markets, small issuers and the local ecosystems surrounding SME markets. In particular, the Commission is seeking views on the MiFID II provisions which set the scope of SME Growth Markets, the market requirements for SME issuers to be assisted by a key adviser, delisting rules on SME Growth Markets and transfer of listings. 

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published two revised Opinions providing further guidance on the post-trade transparency and position limits requirements relating to transactions on non-EU trading venues under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. ESMA first published the Opinions in May 2017.

The first Opinion sets out ESMA's view on determining third-country trading venues for the purpose of transparency under MiFIR. MiFIR requires EU investment firms to make information on transactions in financial instruments traded on a trading venue public. Details of actual transactions must be made public as close to real time as possible – for equities, within one minute of trading, and for non-equities, within 15 minutes (reducing to five minutes in 2020). The Opinion sets out ESMA's view of which transactions between EU and non-EU firms, and which transactions conducted on third-country trading venues should be subject to these post-trade transparency requirements. The Opinion provides objective criteria for identifying those third-country venues that have similar post-trade transparency requirements as EU trading venues. Trades on third-county venues that satisfy the criteria will not need to be made transparent post-trade.

Read more.

An amending Delegated Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union which closes a loophole in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive provisions relating to systematic internalisers. In February this year, the European Securities and Markets Authority highlighted the possibility that investment firms operating broker-crossing networks might try to circumvent the MiFID II requirements by setting up networks of connected SIs which would allow SIs to cross third party buying and selling interests via matched principal trading or other types of back-to-back transactions.

Read more.

The European Commission has adopted Implementing Decisions for equivalence of the legal and supervisory framework of Australia, Hong Kong and the USA for national securities exchanges and alternative trading systems in accordance with the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
 

MiFID II requires EU investment firms to ensure that the trades they undertake in shares admitted to trading on regulated markets, or traded on trading venues should take place on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or systematic internalisers, or third-country trading venues assessed by the European Commission as equivalent. These latest three equivalence decisions by the European Commission will allow investment firms to comply with MiFID II when shares are traded on trading venues in these three countries.
 

View Implementing Decision for Australia.
 

View Implementing Decision for Hong Kong.
 

View Implementing Decision for USA.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Markets in Financial Instruments) (No. 2) Regulations 2017 have been published, and will take effect mainly from January 3, 2018. Some technical provisions will come into force a day earlier, on January 2, 2018, for the purpose of making corrections to other legislation in advance of the implementation date for the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a Policy Statement setting out new Handbook rules and guidance to implement some of the recommendations arising from the Financial Advice Market Review launched by the FCA jointly with HM Treasury in August 2015.

Read more.

The European Commission has adopted a Commission Implementing Decision on the equivalence of the legal and supervisory framework applicable to designated contract markets and swap execution facilities in the United States for the purposes of the trading obligation for derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. From January 3, 2018 MiFIR will require that derivatives declared subject to the trading obligation must be traded on EU trading venues or third-country trading venues recognized by the European Commission as equivalent. Derivatives that will be subject to the trading obligation are euro, dollar and pound interest rate swaps in the most common benchmark tenors, as well as index-based credit default swaps.

Read more.

A Commission Delegated Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, on the criteria for identifying a liquid market for package orders under the Markets in Financial Instrument Regulation.

The Delegated Regulation sets out criteria for identifying package orders for which there is a liquid market as a whole and provides further asset-class specific criteria to be met where a package order consists exclusively of interest rate derivatives, equity derivatives, credit derivatives or commodity derivatives.

View the Commission Delegated Regulation.

The final Regulatory Technical Standards under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation on indirect clearing arrangements for exchange-traded derivatives and amending RTS under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation on indirect clearing arrangements for OTC derivatives have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The versions published are equal to those which were adopted by the European Commission on September 22, 2017. Indirect clearing refers to a situation where two or more entities are intermediaries standing between a client and a CCP in a contractual chain. EMIR established RTS on indirect clearing arrangements applicable to OTC products and MiFID extends these rules and principles to exchange-traded products. The EMIR RTS is now being revised to align with the new MiFIR RTS. Both pieces of legislation allow for indirect clearing arrangements to be established, and establish structures intended to result in equivalent protections for indirect clearing to those available for direct clearing (where only one intermediary exists). Various requirements in relation to segregation and portability at client, clearing member and CCP level are established and new required procedures to manage client defaults apply at clearing member level. Two new kinds of accounts must be established at client, clearing member and CCP level which enable such persons to distinguish indirect client positions and collateral from own account client positions and collateral.

The RTS and the amending RTS will enter into force on December 11, 2017 and will apply from January 3, 2018.

View the RTS on indirect clearing under MiFIR.

View the amending RTS on indirect clearing under EMIR.

View the existing RTS on indirect clearing under EMIR.

The Court of Justice of the European Union has given a preliminary ruling on the meaning and scope of "regulated market" under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive following a referral by the Dutch Administrative Court of Appeal for Trade and Industry. A regulated market is defined in MiFID I as "a multilateral system operated and/or managed by a market operator, which brings together or facilitates the bringing together of multiple third-party buying and selling interests in financial instruments - in the system and in accordance with its non-discretionary rules - in a way that results in a contract, in respect of the financial instruments admitted to trading under its rules and/or systems, and which is authorised and functions regularly and in accordance with the provisions of Title IIII". The definition is unchanged in MiFID II which will replace MiFID I from January 3, 2018.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a statement alerting investors about the high risks of investment in Initial Coin Offerings, including the risk of total loss of their investment. The statement is accompanied by an alert to EU firms involved in ICOs reminding them of their regulatory obligations.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a consultation proposing amendments to the Regulatory Technical Standards on the equity transparency obligations of trading venues and investment firms (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587, known as 'RTS 1') under the Markets for Financial Instruments Regulation. MiFIR requires Systematic Internalisers to make public firm quotes in equity instruments. The quotes must: (i) be at least equivalent of 10% of the standard market size for the quoted instrument; (ii) include both a bid and offer price; and (iii) reflect the prevailing market conditions for that instrument. RTS 1 specifies the concept of 'prices reflecting prevailing market conditions' as being 'close in price, at the time of publication, to quotes of equivalent sizes for the same financial instrument on the most relevant market in terms of liquidity'. ESMA is of the view that this specification needs to be amended because the quotes of an SI can only adequately reflect prevailing market conditions when the quotes reflect the minimum price increments ('tick sizes') quoted for a financial instrument on a trading venue.

Read more. 

A Commission Delegated Regulation with Regulatory Technical Standards on information and requirements for the authorization of investment firms under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. MiFID II provides the requirements and conditions for authorization of an investment firm. The RTS set out the information that a firm applying for authorization as an investment firm must submit to the relevant national regulator. The information includes general corporate information, information on the applicant's sources of capital and financial situation, information on the applicant's shareholders, management body and persons who direct the business and information on the organization of the firm.

Read more. 

A Commission Delegated Regulation with Regulatory Technical Standards on the information requirements for notification by a proposed acquirer of its proposed acquisition of a qualifying holding of an investment firm under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Both MiFID and MiFID II require that acquisitions of an investment firm or a qualifying holding in an investment firm are subject to prior approval by the relevant regulator. A qualifying holding is a direct or indirect holding in an investment firm of 10% or more of the capital or voting rights. The RTS set out the information that an acquirer must submit to a national regulator so that it can assess the proposed acquisition. The information includes that of the proposed acquirer, the persons who will direct the business of the target entity, the new proposed group structure and its impact on supervision and financing of the acquisition. The RTS also provide for the information requirements to be reduced where the proposed acquirer is an EU authorized entity and where the target entity does not hold client assets, is not authorized to undertake proprietary trading or underwriting of financial instruments and, if the target is authorized as a portfolio manager, the assets under management by the target are less than EUR 500 million.

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has announced the launch of the second phase of its Financial Instrument Reference Database (FIRDS). FIRDS covers the requirements under both the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the Market Abuse Regulation for reference data collection, transparency reporting obligations, submission of the Double Volume Cap data and the transaction exchange reporting mechanism. With the launch, ESMA is providing access to the database holding the currently available reference data that market participants will use to identify instruments subject to the reference data reporting requirements. The aim of the launch is to assist market participants in preparing their systems in advance of the obligation coming into effect on January 3, 2018.

View ESMA's announcement.

The European Commission and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission have published a joint statement announcing a common approach for recognizing certain derivatives trading venues authorized in the EU and the US for the purposes of the trading obligation. The Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation imposes a trading obligation on EU financial counterparties and non-financial counterparties for transactions in derivatives that: (i) have been declared subject to the clearing obligation under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation; (ii) are admitted to trading or traded on at least one EU trading venue (a regulated market, multilateral trading facility or organized trading facility) or a third-country equivalent trading venue; and (iii) are sufficiently liquid. The European Commission may adopt an equivalence decision declaring that certain third-country trading venues are subject to an equivalent legal, supervisory and enforcement regime to the EU requirements under MiFID II and the Market Abuse Regulation. The common approach signifies that it is intended that the European Commission will adopt an equivalence decision for swap execution facilities and designated contract markets regulated by the CFTC. Similarly, the CFTC will exempt MTFs and OTFs from the requirement to register as SEFs.

Read more. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a briefing on the Legal Entity Identifier for compliance with the revised Markets in Financial Instruments package. MiFID II has applied across the EU since January 3, 2018. The LEI provides a clear and unique identification of legal entities participating in financial instruments. Firms need an LEI to ensure compliance with their reporting obligations under a number of existing EU regulations and directives, including the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, the Market Abuse Regulation and the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation. The purpose of ESMA's briefing is to flag to investment firms, investment firm clients, trading venues, issuers and Approved Reporting Mechanism firms that they will need an LEI to fulfil their obligations under MiFID II. In addition, the use of the LEI is required, or is in the process of being implemented, in other jurisdictions, including the United States, Canada and Asia-Pacific.

View the briefing.

A Commission Delegated Regulation exempting compliance with the pre- and post-transparency requirements for non-equity transactions with the Bank for International Settlements and the central banks of 12 third countries has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Market in Financial Instruments Regulation, which applies from January 3, 2018, exempts transactions from the trade transparency rules where a member of the European System of Central Banks is a counterparty to the transaction, provided that the transaction is entered into in the performance of monetary, foreign exchange or financial stability policy and the central bank notifies its counterparty that the exemption applies. The exemption does not apply to transactions entered into by a member of the ESCB in the performance of their investment operations. MiFIR allows the European Commission to extend the exemption to other central banks. The Delegated Regulation provides for the exemption to be extended to the BIS and to central banks in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey and the US. The list may be amended in the future to add or remove a central bank. The Delegated Regulation enters into force on October 27, 2017, and will apply from January 3, 2018.

View the Delegated Regulation.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published final Guidelines on the requirements for the management body of market operators and Data Reporting Services Providers. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive requires all members of the management body of any market operator to be of sufficiently good repute, possess sufficient knowledge, skills and experience to perform their duties, to commit sufficient time to perform their functions and to act with honesty, integrity and independence of mind. Market operators must also promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body. Similar requirements are placed on the management body of DRSPs, but DRSPs are not required to promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority has published a final Report and final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the trading obligation for derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The trading obligation is applicable to classes of derivatives that: (i) have been declared subject to the clearing obligation under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation, (ii) are admitted to trading or traded on at least one EU trading venue (a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, organized trading facility or a third country equivalent trading venue) and (iii) are sufficiently liquid. The trading obligation will apply to financial counterparties and to non-financial counterparties. Where ESMA determines that a class of derivatives should be subject to the MiFIR trading obligation, third country trading venues would only be permissible for trading by EU entities when determined to be equivalent by the European Commission.

The final draft RTS on the trading obligation provide for the trading obligation to apply to fixed-to-float interest rate swaps denominated in euros, US dollars and pound sterling and to index credit default swaps (iTraxx Europe Main and iTraxx Europe Crossover). The trading obligation for both IRS and CDS will apply from January 3, 2018, unless the clearing obligation for a particular class of derivatives has not yet entered into force.

Read more.