The Financial Conduct Authority published its final report on the investment and corporate banking market study. The focus of the study was on primary market activities in the UK, including equity capital markets, debt capital markets and merger and acquisition services. The FCA published its interim report in April 2016, consulting on its proposed remedies to the deficiencies identified. The FCA does not consider the feedback received an indication that there is any reason to change its interim findings. The FCA concludes that whilst there are a wide range of banks and advisers active in the provision of primary markets services and despite finding that a number of clients, in particular corporate clients, believe that they are well served by such providers, there are some practices undertaken by certain providers that could have a negative impact on competition, particularly for smaller clients. 

The FCA is proposing a ban on restrictive contractual clauses in investment and corporate banking engagement letters and contracts where the clause covers future corporate finance services carried out from a UK establishment. Some banks use clauses in agreements that oblige clients to award or offer future services to that same bank. The FCA considers the most restrictive of these the “right of first refusal” and “right to act” clauses - which the regulator proposes to prohibit. The FCA is proposing to exclude engagement letters relating to bridging loans from the prohibition; because the nature of this type of loan means that banks are unlikely to offer such a loan if it cannot confirm whether it would be instructed to provide the longer term financing. Responses to the consultation are due by December 16, 2017. The FCA aims to publish a policy statement early in 2017 and is proposing that the rules would also apply from early in 2017. 

Read more.

The UK's Competition & Markets Authority published proposals for the implementation of certain remedies to counter the adverse effects on competition which were identified in the CMA's final report on the retail banking market investigation. The CMA published its final report into the supply of retail banking services to personal current account customers and small and banking services to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the UK in August 2016. In that report, the CMA made several recommendations, including the introduction of Open Banking, a single digital application that allows customers to manage their accounts with multiple providers. In response to that recommendation, the nine providers identified in the CMA's report have made proposals for the structure, membership, governance and funding arrangements of the Implementation Entity. It is proposed, amongst other things, that the Implementation Entity's Steering Group would comprise the nine providers as well as representatives of FinTechs, smaller "challenger" banks and payment service providers. Andrew Pinder has already been appointed as Implementation Trustee and will oversee the work of the Implementation Entity. Comments on the Implementation Entity proposals should be provided to the CMA by October 21, 2016. 

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on the correction required for the calculation of Modified Duration for debt instruments subject to prepayment risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR establishes two methods to calculate capital requirements for general interest rate risk. The relevant methods are the Maturity-Based calculation and the Duration-Based calculation of general risk. The final Guidelines apply to the Duration-Based calculation. The Duration-Based calculation uses the concept of Modified Duration pursuant to the formulae outlined in the CRR. This method is only valid for instruments that are not subject to repayment risk. The EBA has is mandated to issue guidelines establishing how to correct the Modified Duration calculation to reflect prepayment risk. The EBA has proposed two approaches to correct the calculation. One option is to treat the debt instrument with prepayment risk as if it is a combination of a plain vanilla bond and an embedded option. The Modified Duration of the plain vanilla bond is therefore corrected with the change in value of the embedded option; which is estimated according to its theoretical delta, resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The other option is directly to calculate the change in value of the whole instrument subject to a repayment risk resulting from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates. The Guidelines will apply from March 1, 2017.

View the final Guidelines.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published two sets of final Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies under the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities Directive and the Alternative Investment Funds Management Directive. The Guidelines follow ESMA’s final report that was published in March of this year.

The UCITS Sound Remuneration Guidelines will apply to management companies, including those that are subsidiaries of credit institutions subject to sector-specific remuneration principles, and investment companies that have not designated a management company authorized under the UCITS Directive. The Guidelines set out the obligations of the management company to manage its financial situation and the governance of remuneration (which includes issues such as the design, approval and oversight of the remuneration policy) and outline the requirements for establishing and applying remuneration policies and practices for management companies and their identified staff, specifying the categories of identified staff. 

Read more.

A Bill was introduced in the UK Parliament proposing amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and Terrorism Act 2000. The Bill forms part of the UK Government’s Action Plan to counter money laundering and the funding of terrorism. The Government launched a consultation in April this year on its proposals to overhaul the UK approach to AML and CTF. The Government’s Response to the initial consultation was published on the same day that the Bill was introduced. 

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published the final Standard for Total Loss Absorbing Capacity holdings. The Financial Stability Board published the TLAC requirements for global systemically important banks in November 2015, which set a minimum requirement for TLAC for G-SIBs, including a Term Sheet implementing the requirements. The Term Sheet states that G-SIBs must deduct, from their own TLAC or regulatory capital, exposures to TLAC instruments and liabilities issued by other G-SIBs and calls on the Basel Committee to further specify these requirements. The Basel Committee consulted in November 2015 on the proposed treatment of TLAC holdings in G-SIBs. 

The TLAC holdings standard will require banks to deduct holdings of TLAC instruments that are not already included in regulatory capital from their own Tier 2 capital, subject to the thresholds that apply to existing holdings of regulatory capital and an additional 5 per cent threshold for non-regulatory-capital TLAC holdings only. In addition, instruments that are ranked at the same level as subordinated forms of TLAC must also be deducted. 

The TLAC holdings standard will apply to G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs from January 1, 2019 for investments in
most G-SIBs which is the same time that the TLAC requirements apply. The TLAC holdings standard will apply later for G-SIBs headquartered in emerging market economies. 

View the final Standard.

A Commission Implementing Regulation containing Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of assessments by Credit Rating Agencies for securitization positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR permits the risk weights under the standardized and internal ratings based approaches for securitization positions to be determined, if applicable, based on the credit quality of the positions. This credit quality is determined by reference to credit ratings issued or endorsed by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation). The ITS determine the mapping between credit ratings and the credit quality steps for the allocation of risk weights set out in the CRR for securitization positions. The ITS enter into force from November 1, 2016.

View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for securitizations.

A Commission Implementing Regulation containing the Implementing Technical Standards on the mapping of credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The CRR requires the credit ratings scales used by ECAIs (i.e., credit rating agencies that are registered or certified under the EU Credit Rating Agency Regulation) to be mapped to the risk weights categories in the CRR. 

The European Commission has adopted ITS that amended the final draft ITS submitted by the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority). This is despite the ESAs rejecting the Commission's proposed amendments in an Opinion published in May 2016. 

The ITS aim to ensure sound credit assessments to encourage financial stability in the EU and determine an objective approach for attributing risk weights to assessments carried out by ECAIs. 

View the ITS on mapping of credit assessments for credit risk.

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit declared the structure of the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau unconstitutional, stating that the “massive, unchecked power” exercised by its director, Richard Cordray, lacks necessary supervision and direction from the President of the United States. It also vacated a $109.2 million penalty against PHH Corp., a home mortgage loan provider, sending it back to the CFPB for further proceedings.

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published a consultation paper and discussion paper on the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions under the Basel III capital framework and related policy considerations. The International Accounting Standards Board and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board have adopted new provisioning standards that require the use of expected credit loss models rather than incurred loss models - the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 and the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL), respectively. These standards modify provisioning standards to incorporate forward-looking assessments in the estimation of credit loss. The new IASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2018, although earlier application is permitted. The new FASB Standards will apply from January 1, 2020 for certain banks that are public companies and from 2020 for all other banks, although early application by all banks is permitted from 2019. The Basel Committee is considering the implications of new ECL models for regulatory capital because the new models will result in fundamental changes to the provisioning practices of banks. The consultation paper sets out the current regulatory treatment of provisions as well as the Basel Committee’s proposal to retain, for an interim period, the current regulatory treatment of provisions under the standardized and the internal ratings-based approaches. In particular, the Committee is proposing that, in the interim period, jurisdictions would extend their existing approaches to categorizing provisions as general provisions (GP) and specific provisions (SP) to provisions measured under the applicable ECL accounting model.

Read more.

The G7 Cyber Expert Group published a statement on the fundamental elements of cyber security in the financial sector. The high-level elements are intended to assist a financial sector entity to design and implement their cyber security strategy and operating framework as well as to guide public authorities in developing their policies. The elements include the establishment of a cybersecurity strategy and operating framework, governance, risk and control assessments, monitoring, timely and proportionate responses to a cyber incident, the recovery of operations and remediation following a cyber security event, sharing information and reviewing the strategy and framework regularly to address relevant changes. The elements are not legally binding. 

View the elements of cyber security.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a Final Report providing its responses to the feedback on the proposed Guidelines on transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronization under the MiFID II package. The final Guidelines were also published. The MiFID II package, which comprises the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive as well as the related technical standards, imposes transaction reporting and order record keeping obligations on investment firms, approved reporting mechanisms, trading venues and systematic internalizers. The Guidelines focus on the preparation of transaction reports and order data records for various scenarios and aim to harmonize across Member States the approach to compliance with the MiFID II requirements. The Guidelines also include examples for reporting specific financial instruments with a focus on derivatives and provide further clarification on specific legislative provisions in the MiFID II package, on terms such as “reportable events” and “gateway-to-gateway latency”.  The Guidelines will apply from January 3, 2018 in line with the application date of the MiFID II package.

View ESMA's Final Report and final Guidelines.

The Bank of England published a consultation paper on the Bank’s proposals to reform the Sterling Overnight Index Average Interest Rate Benchmark, known as SONIA. The Bank of England, which took over as administrator of SONIA on April 25, 2016, notes that despite being viewed as critical for the sterling financial markets, SONIA is currently based on a market for brokered deposits which has limited transaction volumes. The consultation builds on the Bank’s earlier consultation in mid-2015, where it proposed that SONIA should capture a broader range of unsecured overnight deposits by including bilaterally negotiated transactions alongside brokered transactions. The Bank is seeking feedback on its proposals in four areas: (i) the SONIA calculation methodology: the Bank is proposing to switch the current calculation to measuring the average rate using a volume-weighted median, rather than a volume weighted mean; (ii) the definition of SONIA: the Bank is proposing to amend the definition of SONIA to reflect recent EU and IOSCO benchmark regulatory reforms and to account for international best practices for benchmark administration; (iii) transition planning: the Bank is working with market participants to transition from the current benchmark to the proposed reformed SONIA between October and December of 2017; and (iv) publication policies: the Bank is proposing to publish SONIA at 9:00 a.m. on the business day following the business to which the data pertains and to charge users who receive SONIA data on a timely basis directly from the Bank. Responses to the consultation are due by December 31, 2016. The Bank is expected to publish the final methodology for and definition of SONIA, the transition arrangements, and the publication and licensing arrangements in early 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The European Banking Authority published an updated Report on the monitoring of Additional Tier 1 instruments and standardized templates for AT1 instruments. This follows a consultation in July 2016. The Capital Requirements Regulation sets out the eligibility criteria for AT1 instruments, which are further detailed in Regulatory Technical Standards. The CRR requires the EBA to review the quality of own funds instruments issued by banks across the EU. The Report sets out the results of its monitoring the issuances of AT1 capital instruments, assessing the terms and conditions of selected issuances against the criteria provided for in CRR and the related RTS. The Report is based on the review of 33 AT1 issuances from EU banks, which took place between August 2013 and December 2015, for a total amount of EUR 35.5 billion. The Report sets out detailed analysis of some of the clauses reviewed, including the EBA's views on those clauses, and interpretation of some of the CRR provisions, in particular the provisions relating to triggers.  

Read more.

As part of remarks delivered at an Institute of International Finance panel on blockchain, US Federal Reserve Board Governor Lael Brainard addressed distributed ledger technology, noting that this technology may represent the most significant development in many years in payments, clearing and settlement. Brainard highlighted the payments system as an important area of oversight, noting that the FRB wants to maintain public confidence in the payments system, while supporting innovation that provides broadly shared benefits to the public over time, including through reduction of unnecessary frictions, costs and delays.

Among other things, Brainard discussed several use cases that the FRB explored in its discussions with industry stakeholders in order to illustrate the potential of distributed ledger technologies, as well as considerations important to the FRB in its assessment of benefits and risks. Regarding risk associated with the use of distributed ledgers, Brainard stated that, “[w]hat matters to us as policymakers and regulators is not only whether the migration to a new technological platform increases or reduces risks, but also whether risks are rendered more or less opaque, and how they are distributed among and between financial intermediaries and end users.”

Brainard noted that going forward, the FRB will deepen its engagement with a range of financial institutions and other stakeholders to refine its understanding of the new technologies, and will focus specifically on is responsibilities for the payments system, as well as its oversight of financial market intermediaries. The FRB expects to publish a research paper later this year that summarizes some key findings from its industry engagement on this topic thus far.

View Governor Brainard's remarks.

The Financial Action Task Force published a report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors updating them on the steps being taken by the FATF on implementation of international standards on transparency and beneficial ownership. In April 2016, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors requested the FATF and the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes to make initial recommendations by October 19, 2016 on ways to improve the implementation of the international standards on transparency, including on the availability of beneficial ownership information, and its international exchange. The report states that many countries still do not implement the beneficial ownership requirements effectively. Therefore, the FATF has committed to focus on beneficial ownership in the FATF peer review follow-up process, to deliver recommendations on how countries can improve their implementation of beneficial ownership requirements and to improve cooperation between the FATF and the Global Forum to improve transparency on beneficial ownership. The FATF will be considering the initial recommendations further at its meeting on October 19, 2016. The FATF is also calling on the G20 members to issue a public commitment to meet the FATF standards on beneficial ownership because, in the FATF's view, prevention of the abuse of corporate vehicles can only be remedied by individual countries. 

View the report on beneficial ownership. 

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission Division of Market Oversight (DMO) extended time-limited no-action relief to swap execution facilities from certain requirements in the definition of “block trade” in CFTC regulations. Specifically, CFTC regulation section 43.2 defines a “block trade” as, among other things, a publicly reportable swap transaction that “[o]ccurs away from the registered [SEF’s] or [DCM’s] trading system or platform and is executed pursuant to the registered [SEF’s] or [DCM’s] rules and procedures.”

Subject to certain conditions, the no-action letter extends time-limited relief to SEFs from the “occurs away” requirement under section 43.2 until November 15, 2017 before 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, or the effective date of any CFTC action with respect to the issues discussed in this no-action letter. Among other things, the extension will allow the DMO to continue to evaluate best practices and a more permanent solution to the issues involved in screening block trade orders for compliance with risk-based limits including, if appropriate, amendments to CFTC regulations.

Parties to a swap who do not use the SEF functionalities this letter provides must ensure the required pre-execution credit check occurs.

View CFTC staff letter.

The CFTC announced that CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad and Andrew Bailey, Chief Executive of the FCA, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding cooperation and the exchange of information in the supervision and oversight of certain regulated firms that operate on a cross-border basis in the United States and in the United Kingdom.

Through the MOU, the CFTC and FCA express their willingness to cooperate in the interest of fulfilling their regulatory mandates. The scope of the MOU includes the 20 firms registered with the CFTC as swap dealers.

View MOU.

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on the proposed Guidelines for the assessment of Information and Communication Technology risk under the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process. The increasing complexity of ICT risk in the banking industry and the increasing potential adverse prudential impact such risks pose to individual firms and on the sector as a whole has led the EBA to propose the Guidelines. The purpose of the proposed Guidelines is to promote common procedures and methodologies for regulators throughout the EU when they are conducting supervisory assessments of a firm's governance and strategy on ICT and a firm's exposures and controls, as required by the Capital Requirements Directive. National regulators should apply the Guidelines to their assessment of firms proportionately, as set out in the EBA SREP guidelines. The proposed Guidelines should be read alongside the EBA SREP Guidelines. Responses to the consultation are due by January 6, 2017.          

View the draft Guidelines.

View the EBA SREP Guidelines. 

The UK Payment Systems Regulator published the final Guidance on its approach to monitoring compliance with the EU Interchange Fee Regulation. The final Guidance consolidates the previous final Guidance published in March 2016 on enforcing compliance of the provisions of the Regulation that came into force on December 9, 2015, with the latest Guidance relating to provisions that subsequently came into force on June 9, 2016. The PSR has also published a Policy Statement which summarizes the main responses to the PSR's latest draft Guidance. 

The Interchange Fee Regulation imposes caps on interchange fees on consumer debit and credit card transactions where the issuer and acquirer are both located in the EEA. The final Guidance applies to payment card schemes, issuing and acquiring payment service providers, processing entities, other technical service providers and merchants. 

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published draft Guidelines on trading halts by regulated markets under the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. MiFID II requires regulated markets to temporarily halt or constrain trading if there is a significant price movement in a financial instrument (equity, equity-like and debt instruments) on that market or a related market in a short period. Regulated markets must also, in exceptional cases, cancel, vary or correct any transaction. ESMA is required to develop Guidelines on the calibration of those trading halts, taking into account the liquidity of the different asset classes and sub-classes, the nature of the market model and types of users. ESMA is also proposing Guidelines, at its own initiative, which set out how trading halts should be communicated to market participants and other venues and on the procedure and format of submissions by regulated markets to national regulators setting out the parameters for halting trading. The Guidelines will apply to national regulators, trading venues (regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs) and all trading systems allowing or enabling algorithmic trading. The consultation closes on December 6, 2016. ESMA intends to finalize the Guidelines in Q1 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The CFPB issued a final rule that applies federal consumer protections under Regulations E and Z for prepaid account users for the first time. Prepaid accounts may be loaded with funds by a consumer or by a third party, such as an employer. Consumers generally can use these accounts to make payments, store funds, withdraw cash at ATMs, receive direct deposits or send money to others.

Read more.

The OCC issued risk management guidance to national banks, federal savings associations and federal branches and agencies regarding the periodic reevaluation of risks in connection with providing correspondent banking accounts for foreign banks. The guidance provides a collection of best practices for banks to consider when undertaking such periodic reevaluations and when determining whether to retain or terminate certain accounts. Such practices include, among others, communicating these decisions to bank senior management with consideration given to potential international financial inclusion impacts, considering mitigating information obtained from foreign financial institutions and ensuring a clear audit trail of the reasons and method used for account closure.

The guidance restates the OCC’s supervisory expectation that banks assess risks associated with foreign correspondent banking as part of their on-going risk management and due diligence practices. As a general matter, decisions to retain or terminate banking relationships reside with the bank. The OCC does not direct banks to open, close or maintain individual accounts without regard to the risks presented by an individual customer or the bank’s ability to manage the risk.

View OCC guidance.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published draft Guidelines on the target market assessment for the new product governance requirements in the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. The product governance requirements require firms which manufacture and distribute financial instruments and structured deposits to act in their clients’ best interests during all the stages of the life-cycle of products or services. The requirements in MiFID II were further specified in secondary legislation which was adopted by the European Commission in April 2016. ESMA's proposed Guidelines focus on the ‘target market assessment’, which has been identified as the most important for achieving consistent application of the product governance requirements across the EU. 

The proposed Guidelines set out, amongst other things, the determination of the potential target market by the manufacturer or distributor in terms of categories to be considered and differentiation on the basis of the nature of the product manufactured or distributed, regular reviews to assess whether products and services are reaching the target market and the distribution of products manufactured by entities not subject to the MiFID II product governance requirements by MiFID II distributor firms. ESMA has also included practical examples and case studies on the application of certain aspects of the proposed Guidelines. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017. ESMA will consider the feedback it receives and intends to publish a final report in Q1 or Q2 2017. 

View the consultation paper.

The European Securities and Markets Authoritypublished draft Guidelines on the requirements for the management body of market operators and Data Reporting Services Providers respectively. The revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive requires all members of the management body of any market operator to be of sufficiently good repute, possess sufficient knowledge, skills and experience to perform their duties, to commit sufficient time to perform their functions and to act with honesty, integrity and independence of mind. Market operators must also promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body. Similar requirements are placed on the management body of DRSPs but DRSPs are not required to promote diversity and allocate adequate human and financial resources to the induction and training of the management body.

The proposed Guidelines will apply to the management body of market operators which are the individuals who operate a regulated exchange and to DRSPs. Investment firms operating a multilateral trading facility, an organized trading facility or banks operating a trading venue will not be subject to the proposed Guidelines. Instead the management bodies of operators of these other types of trading venues will be subject to separate Guidelines developed under other provisions of MiFID II and the Capital Requirements Directive which ESMA and the European Banking Authority are expected to consult on soon. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017. ESMA will consider the feedback it receives and intends to publish a final report in Q1 or Q2 2017.

View the consultation paper. 

The US Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC posted the public portions of the required “targeted submissions” for eight systemically important US banking institutions. This follows the joint determination of the agencies in April of this year that each of the 2015 resolution plans of Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, JPMorgan Chase, State Street and Wells Fargo was not credible or would not facilitate an orderly resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code, the standard established in the Dodd-Frank Act. Accordingly, the agencies issued joint letters to these firms detailing the deficiencies in their plans and requisite actions to be taken by the firms to address them. The firms were given until October 1, 2016 to remediate their deficiencies and file a targeted submission to the agencies detailing the remediation. A firm that has not remediated the identified deficiencies may be subject to more stringent prudential requirements.

The agencies jointly identified weaknesses in the 2015 resolution plans of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup that the firms must address in their 2017 resolution plans. These firms were also required to file targeted submissions by the October 1st deadline.

View targeted submissions.

and.

Nearly 500 members of two national task forces convened by the US Federal Reserve Board began their review of nineteen proposals submitted by interested task force members across the payments industry that outline potential approaches for a faster payment system in the United States.

One task force is focused on faster payment capabilities, while the other is working to enhance payment system security. The review by the two task forces, each of which includes representatives of financial institutions, consumer groups, payment service providers, financial technology firms, businesses, government agencies and other interested parties, follows an independent analysis of the proposals by a global consulting firm, which assessed the proposals against 36 effectiveness criteria created by members of both task forces earlier this year.

A final two-part report is expected to result from the Faster Payments Task Force work effort. The first section, slated for release in January 2017, will describe the task force history and background. The report will detail gaps in the current payments landscape, identify opportunities for improvements and outline the benefits to the public of a faster payment system and the needs it would serve.

The second section of the final report, targeted for release in mid-year 2017, will include a discussion and assessment of the specific proposals, offering models of what an end-to-end faster payment system in the United States could look like and demonstrating how each proposal measured up against the various effectiveness criteria. This section will also identify strategic issues deemed important to the successful development of faster payments in the United States and recommend industry actions required to advance their implementation and adoption.

View Federal Reserve Board press release.

The European Commission adopted Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for uncleared OTC derivatives. The European Market Infrastructure Regulation requires counterparties to uncleared OTC derivative transactions to implement risk mitigation techniques to reduce counterparty credit risk. These RTS prescribe the regulatory margin amounts to be posted and collected and the methodologies by which the minimum amount of initial margin and variation margin should be calculated as well as outlining a broad list of securities eligible as collateral for the exchange of margins, such as sovereign securities, covered bonds, specific securitizations, corporate bonds, gold and equities.

The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities submitted final draft RTS to the Commission on March 8, 2016. The Joint Committee is made up of the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. On July 28, 2016, the European Commission requested the ESAs to amend the final draft RTS and submit a modified version for approval. The ESAs rejected many of the proposed amendments in an Opinion published on September 8, 2016, including certain amendments relating to concentration limits on initial margin for pensions scheme arrangements, the proposed amendments to the calculation of the threshold against non-netting jurisdictions, amendments relating to the treatment of covered bonds and the treatment of bilateral derivative contracts where a counterparty is a CCP, transactions with third country counterparties and the process for regulators on the exemption of intragroup derivative contracts.

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a consultation paper containing draft Regulatory Technical Standards specifying the scope of the consolidated tape for non-equity financial instruments under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II. The RTS on the scope of tape for equity instruments was previously endorsed by the European Commission on June 2, 2016. ESMA's proposed draft RTS will amend the endorsed RTS on the equity consolidated tape by adding a list of non-equity asset classes that are to be included in the CTP electronic data stream. The list includes classes of bonds (excluding exchange traded commodities and notes), structured finance products, securitized derivatives, interest derivatives, foreign exchange derivatives, contracts for differences and emission allowances.

Read more.

The Bank of England announced that the results of the UK 2016 banking stress test would be reported to the relevant firms involved on November 29, 2016 and published on November 30, 2016. The 2016 test is the first to be designed under the new approach to stress testing published in October 2015 and covers seven UK banks and building societies: Barclays plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Nationwide Building Society, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, Santander UK plc and Standard Chartered plc. 

The Bank also announced that for the first time the UK stress test next year will include two scenarios: the annual cyclical scenario, which assesses the risks to the banking system resulting from the financial cycle, and an additional "exploratory" scenario which assesses a bank's resilience to a wider range of potential threats. 

View the announcement.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published Model Written Arrangements for Benchmark Colleges (dated September 30, 2016). The Benchmark Regulation requires the national regulator of a benchmark administrator that provides a critical benchmark to establish a college of regulators. ESMA will be a member of each of the colleges. The Model Written Arrangements are intended to provide a framework for establishing a college and for the exchange of information between the relevant regulators. 

View the Model Written Arrangements.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Examples of such transactions include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR places restrictions on providing implicit support to securitizations. These rules apply in addition to the so-called "skin in the game" requirements on originators to retain part of the risk on securitizations. To prevent uncapitalized risks of implicit support, the CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR also states that a transaction is not considered to provide support to a securitization if it is executed under arm’s length conditions and taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The CRR requires a sponsor or originator institution that has failed to comply with this requirement to, at a minimum, hold own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized. The Guidelines set out an objective test in relation to the definition of arm's length conditions.

Read more.

The US Federal Reserve Board’s October 2016 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey revealed that, in general, banks did not change standards on commercial and industrial loans while they tightened standards on commercial real estate loans over the third quarter; banks also reported easing of standards on residential mortgage loans, whether or not the loans were eligible for purchase by government-sponsored enterprises. Banks also noted a weakening of demand from middle- and large-market firms for commercial loans and stronger demand for construction and land development loans in the CRE space. The Federal Reserve Board also asked special questions on commercial and industrial loan demand, and banks indicated that they do not expect changes in demand.

View the Federal Reserve Board’s survey report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a consultation paper on its proposed draft Implementing and Regulatory Technical Standards for the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation. Securities financing transactions involve the use of securities to borrow cash or other higher investment-grade securities, or vice versa. Such transactions can include repurchase transactions, securities lending and sell/buy backs. The purpose of the SFTR is to increase the transparency of such shadow banking activities. The SFTR will require both financial and non-financial market participants to report details of their SFTs to an approved EU trade repository. The draft RTS outlines the procedure and criteria for registration as a trade repository under the SFTR, the use of internationally agreed reporting standards, reporting logic and the main aspects of the structured content of SFT reports, the requirements regarding transparency of data, data collection, aggregation and comparison as well as access levels for different regulators. 

Read more.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a Final Report and final Guidelines on information expected or required to be disclosed on commodity derivatives markets or related spot markets under the Market Abuse Regulation. This follows the consultation that ESMA undertook in March 2016. MAR replaced the current Market Abuse Directive and its implementing legislation from July 3, 2016. One of the changes that MAR will introduce is the expansion of the definition of inside information relating to commodity derivatives to cover price sensitive information relevant to the related spot commodity contracts as well as the derivative. This means that transactions in commodity derivatives based on inside information relating to underlying spot transactions will be expressly prohibited. In addition, the market manipulation prohibitions will include transactions in derivatives markets that manipulate the related spot commodity transaction and transactions in spot commodity markets that manipulate the related derivative. 

Read more.

The OCC published a final rule adopting enforceable guidelines for recovery planning by insured national banks, insured Federal savings associations and insured Federal branches of foreign banks with at least $50 billion in average total consolidated assets. The guidelines are effective on January 1, 2017, but are subject to phased-in compliance based on an institution’s asset size: six months for institutions with $750 billion or more, 12 months for institutions with $100 billion or more but less than $750 billion, and 18 months for institutions with $50 billion or more but less than $100 billion. The guidelines provide a framework for evaluating the financial impact of a severe stress on an institution, and various measures an institution could implement to be able to withstand such a period of stress.

The recovery plan must address the following elements, among others: triggers reflecting the bank’s vulnerabilities, recovery options, impact assessments for each option, escalation procedures, communications procedures and any other information that the OCC communicates in writing to the bank regarding the recovery plan. The OCC noted that it has no specific expectations regarding the length or detail of recovery plans, so long as the plan is specific to the characteristics of each institution. The OCC emphasized that recovery plans should be integrated into a bank’s risk governance framework, and a bank should coordinate its recovery plan with its holding company’s recovery and resolution planning. The guidelines also call for at least annual review of a bank’s recovery plan by management and the bank’s board, as well as management review after any material event.

View FR publication of final rule.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement and Supervisory Statement setting out its final policy approach to underwriting standards for buy-to-let mortgage contracts. The Supervisory Statement sets out the minimum standards that firms should use to underwrite buy-to-let mortgage contracts, including minimum requirements for affordability assessments. It also clarifies that the PRA's expectation is that the reduction of capital requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation for loans to small and medium-sized enterprises should not be applied where the purpose of the loan is to fund a buy-to-let business. The standards will apply to all PRA-regulated firms undertaking buy-to-let lending that are not subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. The PRA expects firms within scope to ensure that the standards are adopted by other firms within their groups that undertake buy-to-let lending. 

The new standards will need to be implemented by relevant firms by January 1, 2017 for the interest cover ratio tests and interest rate affordability stress tests. The remaining standards will need to be implemented by September 30, 2017.
 
View the Policy Statement.

View the Supervisory Statement. 

The Bank of England published a consultation paper proposing the introduction of a draft Code of Practice and Supervisory Statement on governance in recognized payment system operators. The final Code and the Supervisory Statement will contain the minimum governance requirements and expectations for recognized payment system operators to meet. Recognized payment systems include Bacs, CREST, CHAPS, LINK and Faster Payment Services. The Principles for financial market infrastructures, developed by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems and the International Organization of Securities Commissions, form the basis of the draft Code although the Bank has also taken into account other sources such as the UK Corporate Governance Code. Amongst other things, the draft Code would require a recognized payment system operator to be a systemic risk manager (by promoting the safety and efficiency of the payment system and supporting the stability of the financial system), review its performance annually and document its governance policies and procedures. It would also set out the requirements for composition of the board and expectations on governance arrangements. It is not intended that the Code would apply to a recognized payment system that is operated by a recognized clearing house or central securities depository because those entities are already subject to similar requirements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation or the Central Securities Depositories Regulation.  The Bank of England is proposing that the Code be implemented 12 months after publication of the final version. The consultation closes on December 2, 2016.

View the consultation paper. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority published for consultation the draft technical standards it is required to prepare under the Benchmark Regulation. The Benchmark Regulation sets out the authorization and registration requirements for benchmark administrators, including third country entities and requirements for governance and control of administrators.  It provides for different categories of benchmarks depending on the risks involved, imposes additional requirements on benchmarks considered to be critical and gives powers to national regulators to mandate, under certain conditions, contributions to or the administration of a critical benchmark.

Read more.

A Commission Implementing Regulation amending Regulatory Technical Standards on the reporting of financial information under the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The RTS lay down uniform requirements in relation to supervisory reporting to regulators, pursuant to the Capital Requirements Regulation, in the following areas: (i) own funds requirements and financial information; (ii) losses stemming from lending collateralized by immovable property; (iii) large exposures; (iv) leverage ratio; and (v) Liquidity Coverage requirements and Net Stable Funding Requirements. The amending Regulation amends the definitions, templates, and instructions used for the purposes of supervisory reporting. The amending Regulation is based on draft RTS submitted by the European Banking Authority in March 2016. The amending Regulation will enter into force on October 19, 2016 and will apply from December 1, 2016 with the first reporting date being December 31, 2016.

View the amending Regulation. 

The Financial Conduct Authority launched its third consultation on the implementation of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in the UK. The consultation paper is split into two parts. The first part is on conduct of business requirements and covers topics such as inducements, research, client categorization, disclosure requirements, independence, dealing and managing, suitability, appropriateness and investment research. The second part covers a range of issues such as product governance, supervision and authorization, knowledge and competence requirements and perimeter guidance. 

The FCA's conduct of business proposals follow on from its Discussion Paper published last year which covered two general issues: whether the MiFID II conduct rules should apply to insurance-based investments and pensions and whether the MiFID II rules applicable to the activities of advising on or selling structured products should be incorporated into the FCA's Conduct of Business sourcebook. On the first issue, the FCA has decided to wait until EU implementing measures under the Insurance Distribution Directive are finalized before it sets out its proposals. The FCA is intending to consult on implementing the IDD in 2017. On the second issue, the FCA has decided to proceed with incorporating such MiFID II rules into the Conduct of Business sourcebook. The FCA is proposing to apply individual conduct rules to those activities, which is in line with the provisions in MiFID II. 

Read more.

The US Comptroller of the Currency, Thomas J. Curry, spoke at a conference of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists about the OCC’s role in the BSA/AML regulatory regime and the risks the regime is meant to curtail. Curry noted that risks in the BSA and AML space are increasing and that banks must have effective systems for BSA and AML management and timely reporting. He cautioned against overly reactionary “de-risking,” where institutions shrink their exposure to high risk geographies and customers, warning that it can lead to entire regions being excluded from the global financial system.

Curry noted that regulators can work with banks they supervise to help them maintain and enhance risk-management systems by communicating expectations clearly. He highlighted specific actions regulators have recently taken, including the joint fact sheet published by the US Treasury on the BSA and AML examination process regarding foreign correspondent banking. He also highlighted upcoming OCC guidance that will clearly lay out the risk management expectations for banks regarding their foreign correspondent portfolios, including best practices for banks on governance, communications and risk mitigation regarding correspondent accounts. Curry closed by reiterating the key points from the joint fact sheet, namely that the OCC, like its fellow federal regulators does not follow a “zero-tolerance” approach to enforcement, and that a decision to terminate a banking relationship or exit a line of business lies solely with a bank.

View Comptroller Curry's speech.

The European Banking Authority published the final Guidelines specifying the application of the definition of default in relation to the Internal Ratings Based Approach and the Standardized Approach under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR sets out the definition of default of an obligor that is used for the purposes of the IRB and Standardized Approaches. The purpose of the Guidelines is to harmonize the definition of default across the EU framework so that EU banks apply regulatory requirements to their capital positions in a more consistent and comparable way, especially in the context of IRB models. The Guidelines expand on various aspects of the application of the definition of default including the “days past due” criterion for default identification, indications of unlikeliness to pay, specific aspects of the application of the definition of default for retail exposures, application of the default definition in a banking group, treatment of external data and criteria for a return to non-defaulted status. 
 

The US Securities and Exchange Commission voted to establish enhanced standards for the operation and governance of securities clearing agencies that are deemed systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council or that are involved in complex transactions, such as security-based swaps. Covered securities clearing agencies are required to adopt specific enhancements related to financial risk management, governance, recovery planning, operations and disclosure to market participants. The rules, if adopted, will come into effect 60 days after the final rule is published in the Federal Register, and covered security clearing agencies would be required to comply with the rule’s requirements within 120 days thereafter.

The SEC also voted to propose to apply the enhanced standards to other categories of securities clearing agencies, including all SEC-registered clearing agencies that are central counterparties, central securities depositories or securities settlement systems. Comments are due on the proposed amendments within 60 days of publication of the release in the Federal Register.

View proposed rule.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on compensation policies and practices related to the sale and provision of retail banking products and services. The purpose of the Guidelines is to protect consumers from risks associated with poor compensation policies and practices that promote the mis-selling of financial products. The Guidelines apply to compensation paid to staff employed by credit institutions, credit intermediaries, payment institutions and electronic money institutions when selling deposits, payment accounts, payment services, electronic money, residential mortgages and other forms of credit to consumers. The Guidelines contain a framework for such firms to implement compensation policies and practices to improve the correlation between compensation of sales staff and the fair treatment of consumers, with the overall objective of reducing the risk of mis-selling whilst also minimizing conduct costs for firms. The final Guidelines have been amended following feedback received during consultation. Amendments include separate requirements for approval and monitoring of compensation policies and practices, clarification of the type of information to be recorded by firms to achieve compliance, limiting delegation of design and monitoring of compensation policies to ensure that the management body retains ultimate responsibility and clarification that the need to obtain advice on the compensation policies and practices is limited to firms that have established a compensation committee. The implementation date of Guidelines has been postponed from January 3, 2017 to January 13, 2018. The extension is to provide market participants with enough time to implement the Guidelines given the revised application date of MiFID II of January 3, 2018 and align with the application date of the Payment Services Directive II, January 17, 2018.

View the Guidelines.

The CFTC expanded the existing clearing requirement to interest rate swaps through an amendment to regulation 50.4(a), requiring that market participants submit a covered swap for clearing by a derivatives clearing organization. The amendment expanded four interest rate swap classes to require clearing by a DCO: (i) fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps denominated by the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Hong Kong dollar, Mexican peso, Norwegian krone, Polish zloty, Singapore dollar, Swedish krona and Swiss franc; (ii) basis swaps denominated in Australian dollars; (iii) forward rate agreements denominated in Norwegian krone, Polish zloty and Swedish krona; and (iv) overnight index swaps (OIS) denominated in Australian and Canadian dollars, as well as US dollar-, euro- and sterling-denominated OIS with termination dates up to three years. Unlike the proposed rulemaking, AUD-denominated forward rate agreements were not included in the final rule. Compliance with the final rule will be phased in over a two-year period according to an implementation schedule based on when analogous clearing requirements will take effect in other jurisdictions.

View final rule.

View Q&A document.

Janet Yellen, Chair of the Federal Reserve, testified before the Committee on Financial Services of the US House of Representatives. Yellen began by discussing the Federal Reserve Board’s efforts to strengthen regulation on the largest financial institutions, specifically efforts to strengthen the resiliency and provide for the resolvability of large and complex institutions. She discussed several changes to the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review program that have been made or are being contemplated by the Federal Reserve Board. She also highlighted efforts to reduce and streamline regulatory requirements applicable to community banks and proposed that Congress consider carving out community banks from the Volcker Rule and the incentive compensation limits of the Dodd-Frank due to the lower likelihood of the presence at community banks of the sorts of risks those provisions guard against. Yellen closed by briefly discussing current conditions in the financial system. She highlighted the improved financial conditions and funding positions of US G-SIBS, as well as the facts that large and regional banks are well capitalized and increasing in profitability and that community banks are significantly healthier and returning to profitability.

View FRB transcript of Chair Yellen's testimony.

The Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority launched a consultation proposing amendments to the Senior Manager & Certification Regime. Most of the changes result from the legislative changes made in the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016. However, the regulators are also proposing some other changes which they consider appropriate having had the opportunity to assess the SM&CR in practice.

Read more. 

The Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority published proposed revised guidance on remuneration, principally to bring their guidance into line with the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies which apply from January 1, 2017. The remuneration rules and guidance will apply to banks, building societies and investment firms, including UK branches of non-EEA headquartered firms.

Read more. 

The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Policy Statement and final rules on buy-outs of deferred variable remuneration, i.e., where a firm compensates a new employee for deferred variable remuneration not received from a previous employer due to the employee having left the former firm. Current compensation rules, which seek to encourage greater alignment between risk and reward, as well as more effective risk management, allow employers to withhold or reduce unpaid or unvested awards (i.e., the "malus" rules) or recoup paid or vested awards (i.e., the "clawback" rules). The PRA is concerned that the practice of buy-outs could undermine these rules as employees could evade accountability for their actions during a previous employment by moving to a new employer who buys out their cancelled deferred remuneration.

Read more.