The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on the application of the Internal Ratings-Based approach, in particular, the estimation of risk parameters for non-defaulted exposures, namely of the probability of default (PD) and the loss given default (LGD), and on the treatment of defaulted assets. The Guidelines should be applied in conjunction with the requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the assessment methodology for national regulators regarding compliance by firms with the requirements to use the IRB Approach.

The Guidelines aim to address concerns raised over the lack of comparability of capital requirements determined under the IRB approach across firms which the EBA raised in its Opinion and Report on the implementation of the regulatory review of the IRB approach to calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, published in February 2016.

Read more.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced an extension of the comment period for two significant proposals that are currently out for comment. One proposal concerns guidance on supervisory expectations for boards of directors, and the other concerns a new large financial institution supervisory rating system. The comment period for both proposals had been previously extended through November 30, 2017, but will now remain open through February 15, 2018.

View Proposed Guidance on Supervisory Expectations for Boards of Directors.
View Proposed Large Financial Institution Rating System.

Mike Crapo, chairman of the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, introduced the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act which would introduce significant financial regulatory reform. Among other things, the bill, which received bipartisan support, would reduce the threshold at which a bank holding company is considered to be a “systemically important financial institution” from $50 billion to $250 billion. The bill also provides other relief for community banks, including setting a leverage ratio of tangible equity to average consolidated assets of between 8% and 10% for banks with less than $10 billion in assets. These same institutions would be exempt from the Volcker Rule. US Senator Sherrod Brown (ranking member of the US Senate Banking Committee) released a statement opposing the bill, cautioning generally against rolling back the protections of Dodd-Frank with little or no perceived benefit to working families. The full Senate Banking Committee is expected to mark up the bill after Thanksgiving.

View full text of the bill.

Two regulations and two decisions of the European Central Bank on systemically important payment systems have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will enter into force on December 6, 2017. These regulations and decisions have been made by the ECB in its capacity as supervisor under the Single Supervisory Mechanism for Eurozone banks, following the first comprehensive assessment of SIPS.

The two regulations amend: (i) the ECB Regulation on oversight requirements for SIPS, to make clarifications and amendments deemed necessary for the application of the highest oversight standards; and (ii) the ECB Regulation on the powers of the ECB to impose sanctions, to ensure that sanctions can be effectively imposed for oversight infringements.

The two decisions cover procedural aspects for the ECB to impose corrective measures for non-compliance with the ECB Regulation on oversight requirements and the methodology for calculating sanctions when the oversight requirements are infringed.

View Regulation Amending the Regulation on Oversight Requirements.

View Regulation Amending the Regulation on ECB Sanctions Powers.

View Decision on Procedural Aspects.

View Decision on Sanctions Calculation Methodology.

The US House Financial Services Committee announced that it had approved 23 bills, many of which are focused on financial regulatory reform. In a press release, US House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling noted that the bills are intended to provide greater capital market access to small business, and relief for community banks and credit units. The 23 bills include a proposed repeal of Title VIII of Dodd-Frank, which gives the Financial Stability Oversight Council the ability to designate payment and clearing organizations as financial market utilities and allows them to have access to the Federal Reserve discount window. Other bills included in the package would improve the living will submission process and stress testing process, including that a bank holding company would only be subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review process every two years.

View full text of the bills.

Michael Held, Vice President and General Counsel of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York discussed the many lessons learned from the financial crisis and cautioned against the dangers of forgetting these lessons. Mr. Held conceded that although post-crisis reforms and regulations should be reviewed, they should not be repealed at the cost of safety and soundness. Mr. Held discussed the improved resilience of the financial system, including praising the Orderly Liquidation Authority and other post-crisis improvements to the bankruptcy process, as improving cross-border resolution. Mr. Held stressed that financial institutions and regulators need to evolve as systems and risks evolve, in order to be adequately prepared for the next economic downturn.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published a report setting out the outcomes of its ongoing peer review exercise into whether its 2014 Guidelines specifying the criteria for the identification of Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SIIs) have been applied effectively. National regulators from the EU Member States and the supervisory authorities of the three countries of the European Economic Area participated in the peer review exercise. The EBA report concludes that the majority of national regulators are compliant, but notes deviations from the Guidelines in some jurisdictions.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on connected clients under the Capital Requirements Regulation, following two earlier consultations. The Guidelines are intended to replace the "Guidelines on the implementation of the revised large exposures regime" issued in 2009 by the EBA's predecessor, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors.

Read more.

The European Commission has launched a consultation on proposals for statutory prudential backstops to address insufficient provisioning for newly originated loans that turn into non-performing loans. Since the 2007/08 financial crisis, there has been a build-up of NPLs in the EU, which impacts banks' viability and lending capabilities. The Commission is proposing to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation to introduce a requirement for all banks established in the EU to cover incurred and expected losses on newly originated loans that become non-performing. The requirements would be in the form of compulsory and time-bound prudential deductions of NPLs from own funds, and where that minimum coverage requirement is not met, a deduction of the difference between the level of the actual coverage and the minimum coverage from Common Equity Tier 1.

The European Commission has also asked the European Banking Authority to provide technical advice in relation to the Commission's consultation proposals. The advice must provide country-by-country estimates on additional/accelerated capital needs triggered for EU banks by the prudential backstops, taking into account, to the extent possible, expected increases in provisions as a result of the application of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 from January 2018. The advice must also assess the impact of certain design aspects too, including those that are relevant to the functioning, scope design and calibration of statutory prudential backstops. The Commission has requested the EBA to provide its report by November 27, 2017.

The Commission's consultation closes on November 30, 2017.

View the Consultation Paper.

View the consultation page.

View the Commission's request for advice. 

The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on the draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the methods of prudential consolidation under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The CRR provides that banks, investment firms, financial institutions and, when certain criteria apply, ancillary services undertakings, fall within the scope of the prudential consolidation framework. Banks and investment firms are required to fully consolidate all subsidiaries that are banks, investment firms and financial institutions. Different methods of consolidation, such as proportional consolidation, the equity method or the aggregation method, are allowed as an alternative to full consolidation.

Read more. 

The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion and a Report on financial intermediaries and regulatory perimeter issues under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The Opinion and Report are a result of the EBA's up-to-date analysis of issues relating to non-bank financial intermediaries (referred to by the EBA as other financial intermediaries or OFIs) and the scope of EU-level and national prudential regulation. The Opinion and the Report provides the EBA's assessment of the use of the exemptions for certain entities from the CRDIV requirements, national approaches to prudential supervision of OFIs, the ambiguities around the definitions of "ancillary services undertaking" and "financial institution" in CRR and the need to update the list of activities that are part of the EU passporting regime.

The Opinion sets out the EBA's view on issues arising under the EU capital requirements framework that the European Commission, European Parliament and Council of the European Union should consider further in their current deliberations over the proposed amendments to the CRR and CRD.

Read more. 

The European Central Bank has published a Report on the supervision of less significant institutions under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The SSM is made up of the ECB and national regulators of Eurozone member states, and is responsible for the prudential supervision of all banks in the euro area. The ECB directly supervises the larger firms, classified as significant institutions, and national regulators directly supervise the less significant institutions, subject to the oversight of the ECB. The ECB is also responsible for certain common procedures, such as the granting and withdrawal of authorization and the acquisition of qualifying holdings in SSM firms. The ECB can issue guidelines, regulations or general instructions to the SSM national regulators or even take over the direct supervision of a less significant institution (at its own initiative or at the request of the national regulator).

The ECB's Report discusses the main concerns for less significant institutions, which include competition, and suggests that less significant firms may choose to consolidate businesses to improve profitability. The Report also sets out the steps that the SSM supervisory functions have taken towards harmonizing supervisory approaches to level the playing field, and highlights that the key challenge that needs to be addressed is the use of different accounting systems because that hinders comparability of data between the firms. Finally, the ECB indicates that it is developing specific policy positions and operational guidance on issues relevant to Brexit and the likely relocation of some activities of UK firms moving into the Eurozone.

View the report.

Acting Comptroller of the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Keith Noreika questioned the US regulatory requirement for banks to maintain a separation between banking and commerce. Noreika noted that the Glass-Steagall Act was enacted at a time when there were very few banks, distinguishing today’s economy where there are many more banks that are subject to a “robust regulatory regime.” He suggested that preventing commercial firms from engaging in banking activities has concentrated US banking operations in a few large banks. He reiterated a commonly expressed view that the financial crisis demonstrated that the separation of banking and commerce does not make the financial system inherently safer. Noreika also rebuked calls to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act, challenging the notion that the separation of commercial banking from investment banking in any way serves the best interest of the financial system and economy.

View Acting Comptroller Noreika’s speech.

Randal Quarles made his first public address after being formally sworn in as the new Vice Chairman for Supervision of the US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at The Clearing House’s Annual Conference in New York. Although Quarles’s remarks have not yet been posted publicly, he notably called for taking a "fresh look" at various Dodd-Frank regulatory requirements, including stress testing, living wills and the leverage ratio.  Although he generally did not discuss any specifics, he indicated his support for improving transparency, including seeking input for how to improve the Federal Reserve’s stress testing process. He also expressed support for tailoring regulation to reflect the risks associated with a bank’s activities and not just its size. Specifically, he noted that making adjustments to the $50 billion threshold for enhanced prudential supervision under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act are not dependent on Congressional action.

The European Banking Authority has published a final Report and final Guidelines on the supervision of significant branches. The Capital Requirements Directive and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive provide the EU legal framework for the prudential supervision of branches. The Guidelines set out how the consolidating supervisor, the home supervisor and the host supervisor should cooperate to supervise prudentially and assess recovery planning and coordinate monitoring of significant branches requiring intensified supervision. The Guidelines apply to 'significant-plus' branches of EU firms established in another EU member state, not to branches of third-country firms.

Read more. 

The European Banking Authority has launched a consultation on reviewing three Guidelines with the aim of strengthening the Pillar 2 framework. The consultation covers updates to the following:

1. Guidelines on common procedures and methodology for Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP Guidelines).

2. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities (IRRBB Guidelines).

3. Guidelines on institutions' stress testing.

The consultation on the three Guidelines is being run in parallel, with feedback on the proposals requested by January 31, 2018.

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published final guidelines for the identification and management of step-in risk, following consultations in December 2015 and March 2017.

The Basel Committee refers to step-in risk as the risk that a bank may provide financial support to an entity that is under financial stress beyond or without any contractual obligations to do so, to protect itself from any adverse reputational risk that may result from its connection to the entity. The aim of the guidelines is to mitigate potential spillover effects from the shadow banking system to banks. The Basel Committee's work on developing the guidelines is part of the G20 initiative to strengthen the oversight and regulation of the shadow banking system to mitigate systemic risks, in particular risks arising due to banks' interactions with shadow banking entities.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion on issues relating to Brexit where a UK firm seeks to establish an entity within the EU27. The Opinion is addressed to the European Commission, national regulators of member states, the European Central Bank in its role as bank prudential supervisor for entities established in the eurozone and to national regulators in Norway, Lichtenstein and Iceland (as per the EEA Agreement). The Opinion is intended to provide guidance on supervisory expectations and to address regulatory and supervisory arbitrage issues that may arise as firms consider establishing entities within the EU27 before the date of the UK's exit from the EU. The Opinion covers areas such as the authorization process, equivalence access for investment services, internal model approvals, resolution and deposit scheme issues and internal governance and risk management. In particular, the Opinion addresses outsourcing and risk transfers using back-to-back or intragroup transactions. The EBA states that 'letter-box' or 'empty shell' entities do not meet the existing regulatory requirements and that national regulators should assess whether outsourcing is being used solely as a means of obtaining an EU passport. The EBA also considers that a group with a new EU27 entity that uses back-to-back or intragroup transactions to transfer risk must have enough capital, risk management and operational capabilities to absorb any material unhedged or unsecured portfolio in the event of the default of the group entity to which the risks have been transferred.

View the EBA's Opinion.

The European Commission has published a report, addressed to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, on the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The Banking Union is made up of the SSM, the Single Resolution Mechanism and the deposit guarantee scheme. The SSM is the first pillar of the Banking Union, which the European Authorities are aiming to complete by the end of 2019. The SSM is made up of the European Central Bank and national regulators of Eurozone Member States, and implements the prudential policy and requirements of all banks in the euro area. The ECB directly supervises the larger firms, classified as significant institutions, and national regulators directly supervise the less significant institutions, subject to the oversight of the ECB.

Read more.

The European Commission has published a Communication in which it calls for completion of the Banking Union by 2019 and provides a path on how that could be achieved. The Banking Union is made up of the Single Supervisory Mechanism, the Single Resolution Mechanism and the deposit guarantee scheme. The Communication is addressed to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The Communication sets out the Commission's view on the steps needed to complete the Banking Union.

Read more.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has announced that it has agreed to allow jurisdictions discretion to lower the Net Stable Funding Ratio's treatment for derivatives liabilities. The discretion will allow jurisdictions to lower the required 20% stable funding factor for derivatives liabilities to a floor of 5%. The NSFR measures the assumed degree of stability of liabilities and the liquidity of assets over a one-year horizon. Implementation of the NSFR is expected to begin on January 1, 2018 and this agreement is intended to facilitate implementation. The Committee is considering whether any further revisions to the treatment of derivative liabilities are warranted and will carry out a public consultation on any further proposed changes.

View the announcement.

The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposed changes and clarifications to requirements relating to intragroup transactions in the Large Exposures (LE) Part of the PRA Rulebook. The PRA is making the proposals following its review of its framework for the prudential treatment of financial groups.

The LE framework complements the capital framework by aiming to protect firms from large losses resulting from the sudden default of a single counterparty or a group of connected counterparties. The consultation proposals aim to simplify the overall intragroup LE framework, improve the consistency of the process of granting intragroup permissions and facilitate the orderly resolution of banking groups.

Under the LE framework, firms can apply to the PRA for intragroup permissions, under which exposures to certain group members (entities within a firm's core UK group (CUG)) are exempt from the LE limit and are also excluded from a firm's leverage ratio. The LE framework also permits a firm to apply to the PRA to increase its total exposures to certain cross-border group entities (known as non-core LE group (NCLEG) entities) from 25% to 100% of its own eligible capital.

Read more. 

The Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation on proposals to amend the Groups policy framework it has in place for the application of prudential standards to firms on an individual and consolidated basis within banking groups. The consultation proposals are being put forward following a review by the PRA of its Groups policy framework to ensure that it remains coherent and fit for purpose in light of post-crisis financial reforms such as ring-fencing and the Basel III reforms.

The PRA proposes to amend relevant Statements of Policy and Supervisory Statements and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment part of the PRA rulebook to implement changes that will enable: (i) assessment and mitigation of the risks to group resilience due to the use of "double leverage" (which occurs when one or more parent entities in a group funds some of the capital in its subsidiaries by raising debt or lower forms of capital externally); (ii) assessment and mitigation of the risks highlighted by prudential requirements applied by local national regulators on overseas subsidiaries of UK consolidation groups; and (iii) improved monitoring of the distribution of financial resources across different group entities. The consultation paper also sets out some further policy proposals to refine the Groups policy framework.

Comments on the proposals are invited by January 4, 2018. The resulting policy will be implemented fully from January 1, 2019. The PRA also requests that, where practical and applicable, firms should aim to incorporate the consultation proposals in their 2018 ICAAP/Individual Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP) submissions ahead of full implementation.

View the PRA consultation paper on groups policy and double leverage (CP19/17).

The European Central Bank has published for consultation an Addendum to its Guidance for banks on non-performing loans. The ECB published its final Guidance for banks on NPLs on March 20, 2017. The proposed Addendum sets out the ECB's proposal to supplement its Guidance with quantitative supervisory expectations concerning the minimum levels of prudential provisions expected for new NPLs. The ECB notes that the proposed measures should be regarded as prudential backstops which are intended to prevent the excessive future build-up of non-covered aged NPLs on banks' balance sheets. The ECB is proposing that banks would be expected to provide full coverage for the unsecured portion of new NPLs after two years at the latest and for the secured portion after seven years at the latest.

As with the Guidance, the proposed Addendum would be non-binding but would apply to all Eurozone Significant Institutions supervised by the ECB in the Single Supervisory Mechanism as well as their international subsidiaries. If a bank did not comply with the Addendum, then it would need to explain its non-compliance. Any non-compliance could lead to supervisory action being taken. The ECB intends the Addendum to become applicable as soon as it is finalized and for the backstops to apply to new NPLs classified as non-performing from January 2018.

The consultation closes on December 8, 2017. 

View the ECB's proposed Addendum.

View the ECB's Guidance on NPLs.

The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a Policy Statement setting out refinements to the Pillar 2A Capital Framework, under which the PRA sets capital requirements for risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The PRA consulted on the Pillar 2A refinements in a February 2017 consultation which closed on May 31, 2017. The PRA's proposals will be implemented largely as consulted on, save for minor amendments.

The PRA has made the following changes to the Reporting Pillar 2 Part of the PRA Rulebook:

· adjustments to the PRA’s Pillar 2A approach for firms using the standardised approach (SA) for credit risk;

· revisions to the PRA’s internal ratings-based (IRB) benchmark used for assessing credit risk; and

· additional considerations the PRA will make, as part of the SREP, for SA firms using International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) as their accounting framework.

The PRA has also made consequential changes to update:

· its Supervisory Statements "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" and "Pillar 2 reporting, including instructions for completing data items FSA071 to FSA082"; and

· its Statement of Policy "The PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital".

The revised Pillar 2A framework, which will affect banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, takes effect from January 1, 2018.

View the Policy Statement (PRA PS22/17).

Following positive feedback to a combined consultation issued in June 2017, the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee and the Prudential Regulation Authority are proceeding with proposed changes to the UK leverage ratio framework. The aim of the proposals (summarized below) was to ensure that the leverage ratio framework does not act as a barrier to the effective implementation of any monetary policy action that leads to an increase in central bank reserves.

In the June 2017 consultation, the FPC consulted on a draft Recommendation to the PRA that the PRA amend its rules on the leverage ratio to: (i) allow firms to exclude from the calculation of the total exposure measure (which serves as the denominator for the leverage ratio) those assets constituting claims on central banks, where they are matched by deposits accepted by the firm that are denominated in the same currency and of identical or longer maturity; and (ii) require a minimum leverage ratio of 3.25%. Central bank claims include reserves held by a firm at a central bank, banknotes and coins constituting legal currency in the jurisdiction of the central bank, and assets representing debt claims on the central bank with a maturity of no longer than three months.

Read more.

The Bank of England has published a consultation paper setting out proposed changes to the Statement of Policy it issued in November 2016 on its approach to setting a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). MREL is the requirement for firms to maintain a minimum amount of loss-absorbing resources to ensure that, should the firm fail, the resolution authority can use the firm's own financial resources to absorb losses and recapitalize the business so it can continue to provide critical functions without the need to rely upon public funds. The MREL requirement is the EU implementation, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board.

The BoE's 2016 Statement of Policy focused on "external" MREL, i.e. the calibration of the MREL of UK resolution entities. This consultation sets out the BoE's proposals on "internal" MREL, i.e. instruments that are issued to the resolution entity from other legal entities in a group. The consultation paper sets out the scope of internal MREL, how it should be calibrated, which instruments are eligible and the proposed transitional period for the application of the requirements. Internal MREL is intended to cover UK-headquartered banking groups as well as UK subsidiaries of overseas banking groups.

Read more. 

The European Banking Authority has published an Opinion on the design of a new EU prudential framework for non-bank, non-systemically important investment firms. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate and for which a separate prudential regime should be established. The Commission issued a second CfA in June 2016 asking for: (i) advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them; and (ii) advice on the new prudential regime for investment firms that should not be subject to CRD IV. The EBA published an Opinion on point (i) on October 19, 2016 concluding that investment firms that have been identified, according to the current EU regulatory framework contained in the relevant technical standards and EBA Guidelines, as global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) or other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) should be subject to the full requirements of CRD IV although these criteria might need to be revised through technical standards to take into account the specificities of investment firms. This latest Opinion is in response to the second part of the Cfa and follows the EBA's November 2016 Discussion Paper on its proposals.

Read more. 

Following its consultation earlier this year, the Prudential Regulation Authority has published a final Supervisory Statement on compliance with the European Banking Authority's Guidelines on disclosure.

The EBA published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation on December 14, 2016. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a statement reminding firms that the Guidelines of the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities on the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings will apply with effect from October 1, 2017. The Prudential Regulation Authority has provided a similar statement by way of notification on its website.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published a Discussion Paper on significant risk transfer in securitization, seeking views on proposals to strengthen the regulatory and supervisory framework of significant risk transfer. The EBA's proposals are based on the newly agreed European securitization framework, comprising the Securitization Regulation and amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation, which is due to come into effect in 2018. The Securitization Regulation includes new requirements on risk retention, due diligence, transparency and a new regime for simple, transparent and standardized securitizations (known as STS securitizations). STS securitizations will provide preferential regulatory capital treatment for investors, in particular, for bank investors through the related CRR amendments.

The EBA is proposing to strengthen the supervisory treatment of structural features used in securitizations that may impede the ability of originators to meet the SRT requirements on a continuous basis. The structural features are those that are not covered in the EBA's 2014 Guidelines on SRT for securitization - amortization structure, call options, excess spread and synthetic securitization. The EBA proposes a set of safeguards for each structural feature and a requirement that originators submit a risk transfer self-assessment to the national regulator when submitting their SRT notification.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published Guidelines for national regulators aimed at ensuring the convergence of supervisory practices in the assessment of the information and communication technology (ICT) risk under the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP).

Read more.
 

The European Banking Authority has published final draft Implementing Technical Standards setting out the common templates to be used and the procedures to be followed by resolution authorities when reporting to the EBA the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) that has been set for each financial institution in their jurisdiction. The MREL requirement is the EU equivalent, in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, of the standard for total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) set by the Financial Stability Board. The TLAC standard is the minimum amount of loss-absorbing capital an institution needs to hold so that bail-in tools can be deployed successfully on a resolution.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has launched a consultation on changes to its client money rules (CASS 7) to amend the existing 30-Day Rule under which firms are prevented from placing client money in bank accounts with unbreakable terms of longer than 30 days. The FCA introduced the 30-Day Rule in July 2014 to restrict the practice of some firms of depositing client money in unbreakable deposits for periods of up to years. The placing of client money in lengthy unbreakable terms attracts the risk of diminution if a firm is unable to withdraw that money in response to market events and the risk that client money may not be available for distribution in the case of a firm insolvency. Therefore, the FCA was (and remains) of the view that placing client money in unbreakable deposits for long periods is incompatible with the purpose of the client money regime. However, it is now proposing to allow the use of 31-90 day unbreakable deposits following feedback from firms about an increasing reluctance of banks to provide 30-day unbreakable deposits.

The reduced appetite from banks appears to have arisen due to the interaction between the 30-Day rule and the liquidity requirements of the prudential regime. All client money is subject to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio which requires banks to have highly liquid assets to cover 100% of their potential net cash outflows over 30 days. Unbreakable deposits of a maximum of 30 days are therefore capital inefficient.

Read more.

The Financial Conduct Authority has published a Policy Statement and final rules following its January 2017 consultation on proposed changes to the client money distribution rules (CASS 7A) affecting the return of client assets following a firm's failure or other pooling events. The rule changes, which come into effect on July 26, 2017, are designed to speed up the distribution of client assets, improve consumer outcomes and reduce the market impact of an investment firm failure. Following consultation feedback, the FCA is introducing the majority of the proposed changes in the form consulted on. However, minor changes have been made to the proposals on post-transfer client notifications (a 14-day deadline will be introduced rather than the 7-day deadline originally proposed) and on the proposed guidance on reconciliations that follow a primary pooling event. The FCA also provided new guidance concerning the need for firms to designate as client transaction accounts those accounts which the CCP makes available as customer accounts for such purposes. The FCA will not be proceeding with its original proposal to require firms to provide annotated samples of their client statements.

View the FCA Policy Statement (PS 17/18).

The Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on an update to its November 2016 Supervisory Statement, "The minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) - buffers and Threshold Conditions". The Supervisory Statement (SS 16/16) set out the PRA';s expectations on the relationship between the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and both capital and leverage ratio buffers, as well as the implications that a breach of MREL would have for the PRA's consideration of whether a firm is failing, or likely to fail, to satisfy the Threshold Conditions. The Supervisory Statement states that the PRA expects firms not to count Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital towards both MREL and the buffer requirements.

Since its publication of the Supervisory Statement in November 2016, the PRA has been asked about the approach to be taken in the situation where MREL is calibrated on the basis of one capital regime (e.g. leverage, in circumstances where the leverage requirement is larger than the risk-weighted requirement), but the largest requirement for buffers derives from the other regime (e.g. risk-weighted capital). The PRA is consulting on revisions to SS 16/16 to clarify that the expectations set in SS16/16 are not intended to create a different buffer requirement from that which is usable in the going-concern regime.

The PRA invites responses to the consultation by September 29, 2017. The PRA aims to publish a revised supervisory statement by the end of 2017.

View the PRA's consultation paper.

The European Banking Authority has published its final draft Regulatory Technical Standards setting out a comprehensive list of the information that must be provided to national regulators by firms applying for authorization as a credit institution under the Capital Requirements Directive. The final draft RTS are accompanied by final draft Implementing Technical Standards which set out the various procedures and requirements for making applications, along with a template to be used and guidance on how national regulators should deal with incomplete applications. The next step is for the European Commission to consider the draft RTS and ITS with a view to making a decision whether to endorse them via delegated legislation. In an accompanying press release, the EBA urges the Commission to consider adopting the RTS and ITS at the earliest opportunity to enable processing of applications from entities seeking to relocate to continental Europe in the context of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union.

View the EBA Final Report.

View the Press Release.

The UK Prudential Regulation Authority has published a consultation setting out its proposals on a cashflow mismatch risk (CFMR) framework and other methodologies it will use to assess firms' liquidity risk under the Pillar 2 liquidity framework.  CFMR is the risk that a firm has insufficient liquidity from liquid assets and other liquidity inflows to cover liquidity outflows on a daily basis.

The Capital Requirements Directive gives national regulators discretion to set additional Pillar 2 liquidity requirements. The Pillar 2 framework complements the Pillar 1 Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirements by capturing those liquidity risks that are either not captured or not fully captured under Pillar 1. The PRA has previously set out, in a consultation in May 2016, a non-exhaustive list of Pillar 2 risks. This consultation builds on the proposals in, and feedback received on, the May 2016 consultation and proposes updates to the Supervisory Statements "The PRA's approach to supervising liquidity and funding risks" and "Guidelines for completing regulatory returns".

Read more.

The Prudential Regulation Authority is consulting on proposals to change its Supervisory Statement "The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)" and its Statement of Policy "The PRA's methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital". The PRA's proposals are intended to bring greater clarity, consistency and transparency to the PRA's capital-setting approach and to promote a greater level of transparency and disclosure.

Read more.

The Prudential Regulation Authority has launched a consultation on compliance with the European Banking Authority's guidelines on disclosure of the composition of collateral for exposures to counterparty credit risk.

The EBA published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation on December 14, 2016. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR.

Read more.

A Commission Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to central counterparties set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Markets Infrastructure Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority has published for consultation draft Recommendations on outsourcings by financial institutions to cloud service providers.

The EBA has identified the need for specific guidance for outsourcing to cloud service providers to address uncertainty regarding supervisory expectations in this area. The draft Recommendations build on the existing outsourcing guidelines by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors, published in 2006, which the EBA intends to update in due course.

The draft Recommendations address five key areas: the security of data and systems, location of data and data processing, access and audit rights, chain outsourcing, and contingency plans and exit strategies. The draft Recommendations would apply to banks and investment firms subject to the Capital Requirements Directive as well as and national regulators. The EBA will consider whether to extend the applicability of the draft Recommendations to other regulated firms.

The consultation closes on August 18, 2017.

View the Recommendations.

View the CEBS Guidelines.

The European Central Bank has published a final Guide on fitness and propriety assessments for the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders in significant banks. The final Guide differs from the consultation version published in January, with several clarifications being made, including a requirement that fit and proper assessments are confidential. The ECB Guide is based on six Principles, namely: the primary responsibility of banks in carrying out due diligence and assessments, the role of the ECB as a "gatekeeper", the harmonization of assessments across the euro area, proportionality and case-by-case assessment, due process and fairness, and interaction with ongoing supervision. The Guide sets out the five assessment criteria against which the fitness and propriety of members of the management body is assessed: experience, reputation, conflicts of interest and independence of mind, time commitment and collective suitability. The Guide provides information on the purpose, scope and type of interviews conducted by the ECB of appointees. The Guide highlights how a decision is taken by the ECB after every fit and proper assessment and the various types of decisions that may be taken. The Guide also notes that under the Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation, the ECB has the power to remove, at any time, members from the management body of a significant supervised entity who do not fulfill the fit and proper requirements.

View the ECB Guidance.

The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on banks' credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses. These final Guidelines are a result of a consultation that ended on October 26, 2016, and build on the related Guidance by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, published in December 2015. The Guidelines will apply at the start of the first accounting period beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

Many banks in the EU apply the International Financial Reporting Standards. IFRS 9, which will apply for accounting periods beginning January 1, 2018, will require the measurement of impairment loss allowances to be based on an expected credit loss accounting model rather than on an incurred loss accounting model. The use of an ECL accounting model involves some discretion in its application. The Guidelines set out supervisory expectations for credit institutions related to sound credit risk practices associated with implementing and applying an ECL accounting model.

These Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the provisions of the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive IV as well as the relevant technical standards.

View the final Guidelines.

View the Consultation Paper.

View the Basel Committee Guidance.

The European Banking Authority has published final Guidelines on the assessment of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risk in the context of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). These final Guidelines are a result of a consultation that ended on January 6, 2017. The Guidelines will apply to national EU regulators and aim to promote common procedures and methodologies for their assessment of ICT risk. The Guidelines will apply from January 1, 2018.

Read more.

On May 8, 2017, the US Financial Stability Oversight Council issued a readout of its meeting in which FSOC discussed efforts to assess the efficacy of the Volcker Rule. Reportedly, at the closed-door meeting, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin directed the various agencies with oversight over the Volcker Rule to re-examine the scope of permissible activities under the rule.

View text of the FSOC readout.

US Federal Reserve Board Governor Jerome Powell gave a speech at the Global Finance Forum assessing the “core reforms” of the post-crisis financial regulatory framework. Although Governor Powell generally defended such reforms, he acknowledged that some aspects of the framework could be better tailored and less burdensome, in particular with respect to regulations that have been applied to small and medium-sized institutions.  In addition, Governor Powell acknowledged that the post-crisis framework was, in many cases, excessively complex, and called for, among other things, a reassessment of the Federal Reserve’s supervisory expectations of the boards of directors of banking firms.

View text of the speech.

The US OCC announced that its Office of Innovation will host two days of office hours for national banks, federal savings associations (FSAs) and fintech companies to discuss the OCC’s perspective on responsible innovation. This initial round of meetings will be held in the OCC’s San Francisco Field Office on May 16 and 17, 2017. The OCC anticipates holding office hours in other designated cities at a later date.

The OCC’s Acting Chief Innovation Officer Beth Knickerbocker noted that the office hours are an opportunity for attendees to have candid discussions with OCC staff regarding financial technology, new products or services, partnering with a bank or fintech company or other matters related to financial innovation. OCC staff will provide feedback and respond to questions during the one-hour meetings. The OCC expects to meet with up to fifteen companies over the two-day period.

View more information regarding the meetings.

US FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig delivered remarks regarding the semi-annual report of the Global Capital Index released that day.

Read more.

The European Central Bank has published a Guideline and Recommendation to harmonize the way in which Euro member state national regulators of "less significant" banks exercise discretions available to them under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. This follows a public consultation on the draft Guideline and Recommendation, which was launched on November 3, 2016 and ended on January 5, 2017. The ECB has already harmonized the application of options and discretions for the banks that it directly prudentially supervises under the Single Supervisory Mechanism.

Read more.