The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission approved a final rule amending CFTC Regulation 1.22 by removing December 31, 2018 as the automatic termination date of the phased-in compliance period for the Residual Interest Deadline for Futures Commission Merchants. Regulation 1.22 concerns the posting of collateral. In the event that a customer’s account has insufficient margin, an FCM must commit its own capital—often referred to as “residual interest” — to make up the difference. Previously, the Residual Interest Deadline was set at 6pm Eastern Standard Time and would automatically occur, without any CFTC action or opportunity for public input. In November 2014, the CFTC proposed to amend the rule so that the Residual Interest Deadline would not occur earlier than 6pm without an affirmative CFTC action and an opportunity for public comment. The current action by the CFTC is to finalize this change.

View the Final Rule

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission requested public comment on the US District Court of DC’s remand order in Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. v. CFTC (“Cross-Border Litigation”). The CFTC release expands on its consideration of costs and benefits of 10 swaps rules regarding the treatment of overseas swaps subject to the order and requests comment on the application of the costs and benefits of the rules in the context of extraterritoriality. In Cross-Border Litigation, three trade associations challenged the CFTC’s 2013 Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance with Certain Swap Regulations and requested the court to release 14 swap regulations in terms of overseas applications issued in July 2013. On September 16, 2014, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the CFTC and denied the plaintiffs relief; however it required the CFTC to supplement the 10 swaps regulations with a detailed analysis of associated costs and benefits. Comments are due by May 11, 2015.

View the CFTC press release

View the CFTC request for comment

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a revised opinion on its draft RTS on the clearing obligation for interest rate swaps. ESMA has revised its original opinion to take account of the notification it received from the European Commission that the Commission intended to adopt the draft RTS with amendments. The opinion annexes revised RTS which clarify certain points and propose further revisions to the Commission’s amendments, including that: (i) for a period of three years, financial counterparties will be able to apply for the intragroup transaction exemption for their transactions with any third-country entity in the absence of decisions on equivalence; and (ii) the €8 billion clearing obligation threshold applies at individual fund level when the counterparties are UCITS or alternative investment funds.

View the ESMA’s opinion

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association published a set of principles for improving regulatory transparency of the global derivatives markets through standardizing, aggregating and sharing data. The principles are: (i) regulatory reporting requirements for derivatives transactions should be harmonized within and across borders; (ii) policy makers should adopt the use of standards to aid improved quality and consistency of compliance with reporting requirements; (iii) market participants and regulators should collaborate to improve consistency in the absence of global standards; (iv) laws and regulations preventing access by authorities to data across borders should be amended or repealed; and (v) reporting progress should be benchmarked to provide incentives to progress reporting.

View the ISDA principles

The European Securities and Markets Authority published an addendum consultation paper complementing the transparency section of its previous consultation paper published in December 2014 on the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation. The addendum seeks views on transparency requirements for non-equity instruments not covered in the previously published consultation paper, namely foreign exchange derivatives, credit derivatives, other derivatives and contracts for difference. The draft regulatory technical standards on transparency requirements of bonds, structured finance  products, emission allowances and derivatives previously referred to in the December 2014 consultation are completed in this addendum, and therefore the addendum should be read alongside the previously published consultation. MiFID II and MiFIR are applicable from January 3, 2017. The consultation closes on March 20, 2015.

View the consultation paper.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its annual report on its supervision of credit rating agencies and trade repositories. In the report, ESMA sets out its work plan for trade repositories for 2015. Trade repositories are authorized and supervised by ESMA under EMIR. ESMA’s 2015 work plan focuses on: (i) monitoring the action and improvement plans of trade repositories, including the data quality action plan; (ii) monitoring system operation and changes deployment; (iii) thematic reviews relating to the inter-TR reconciliation process, business continuity planning and cost relatedness of fees; (iv) trade repository’s systems software development lifecycle; (v) data availability; (vi) regulators’ access to trade repositories; and (vii) confidentiality of trade repository data.

View ESMA's report.

The Securities and Exchange Commission published final rules regarding security-based swap data repository registration and security-based swap reporting in accordance with Section 763 and Section 766 of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rules establish (i) a registration process for swap data repositories; and (ii) certain policies and procedures for the reporting and dissemination of security-based swap transactions by registered swap data repositories. The goal of the regulation is to improve transparency in security-based swap reporting and is a part of the overall regulatory agenda to improve transparency in the OTC dervatives markets.

Additionally, the SEC issued two security-based swap proposed rules regarding the physical reporting and public availability of security-based swap data. The SEC also proposed new rules, rule amendments and guidance to Regulation SBSR regarding the reporting duties for cleared and platform-executed security-based swap transactions.

View the final rule on the SEC site.

View the SEC Open Meeting notice.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued a no-action letter (“CFTC Letter 15-03”) that provides additional time for reporting parties to comply with certain reporting requirements of the ownership and control final rule (“OCR Final Rule”). CFTC Letter 15-03 letter extends certain relief provided under CFTC Letter No. 14-95, a no-action letter issued July 23, 2014 that extended time-limited no-action relief from certain reporting obligations under the OCR Final Rule. The OCR Final Rule requires the electronic submission of trader identification and market participant data reporting forms. CFTC Letter 15-03 provides time-limited no-action relief for reporting parties from the requirement to file the forms electronically and provide certain additional information required by the OCR Final Rule. The relief is extended to dates ranging from September 30, 2015 to February 13, 2017.

View the CFTC Letter 15-03.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission approved the issuance of amendments that would increase corporate disclosure of company hedging policies for directors and employees. The proposed rules, mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, would require directors, officers and other employees to disclose any hedges or offsetting transactions which would decrease their exposure to equity securities granted by the company as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by directors or employees.

According to the SEC, the proposed rules, if finalized as proposed, would enhance transparency into corporate governance practices and provides additional information to investors to understand the alignment of employee/directors interests with shareholder interests.

View the proposed rule.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its Feedback Statement on its consultation on the clearing obligation for non-deliverable forwards. ESMA confirmed that it has decided against moving forward, at this time, with mandatory clearing requirements for NDFs following the concerns raised by industry participants during the consultation which include: (i) the timing of entry into force of the proposed clearing obligation particularly when participants are currently dealing with implementing processes for compliance with the clearing obligation for interest rate swaps and credit default swaps; (ii) that only one EU CCP is authorized to clear NDFs; (iii) the lack of experience globally of NDF clearing; (iv) the importance of international consistency in implementation of the proposed clearing obligation; and (v) the lack of a consistent definition for FX derivatives across the EU. ESMA originally proposed regulatory technical standards for clearing NDFs with an implementation schedule beginning in Q4 2015. ESMA is of the view that more time is needed to properly consider those concerns, but stressed that its current position did not exclude the possibility of it proposing a clearing obligation for NDFs in future.

View ESMAs feedback statement.

The European Commission published a report on the progress made by CCPs in developing technical solutions for the transfer by pension schemes of non-cash collateral as variation margin. Under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation pension schemes that meet certain requirements are exempt from the clearing obligation for a temporary period. The exemption was included in EMIR to provide CCPs with time to develop solutions for the transfer of non-cash collateral by pension schemes to meet variation margin calls. CCPs require highly liquid collateral, mostly cash, as variation margin, but pension schemes are not set up to hold large amounts of cash and would have to amend their business model at high costs to do so. The exemption period may be extended under EMIR to provide CCPs with further time to develop solutions. The Commission’s report assesses the progress made by CCPs to develop solutions and concludes that not enough progress has been made and that imposing the clearing obligation on pension schemes would adversely effect the retirement benefits of future pensioners. The Commission therefore intends to extend the exemption period for a further two years by adopting a Delegated Act.

View the Commission's report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published an Opinion on the draft of Regulatory Technical Standards on the clearing obligation for itnerest rate swaps under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation. The draft RTS specify details such as the class of OTC derivatives that should be subject to the clearing obligation and the dates from which the clearing obligation takes effect. ESMA’s Opinion follows on from the Commission’s recent communication to ESMA of its intention to endorse the draft RTS with amendments. The amendments proposed by the Commission include postponing the starting date of the frontloading requirement (which is the obligation to clear OTC derivative contracts after a central counterparty has been authorized under EMIR and before the date of application of the clearing obligation), clarifying the calculation of the threshold for investment funds and excluding non-EU intragroup transactions from the clearing obligation. In the Opinion, ESMA addresses the changes made by the Commission to the RTS and, in articular, states that the processes that would exempt non-EU intragroup transactions from the clearing obligation are not appropriate. ESMA states that it can provide technical advice on the issue if requested, so that an alternative solution can be found and delays to the implementation of the clearing obligation can be avoided.

View the Opinion.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published its final report on risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives, setting out nine standards to help strengthen the non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives market. The standards include risk mitigation techniques relating to trade confirmation, valuation with counterparties, dispute resolution and cross-border transactions, and aim, amongst other issues, to enhance legal certainty over the terms of non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions and shorten the amount of time it may take to resolve disputes.

View the final report.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") issued no-action relief for CFTC Regulations 1.10 and 1.17, respectively. The relief pertains to certain introducing brokers ("IB") regarding net capital and financial reporting requirements. The no-action relief allows foreign-domiciled IBs to file audited and unaudited form 1-FR-IBs, utilizing local accounting principles in effect where the IB is located in lieu of US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or International Financial Reporting Standards.

View the CFTC Staff Letter.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published the Memorandum of Understanding it entered into with the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission on December 19, 2014. The MoU was established further to the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation, under which ESMA is required to set out cooperation arrangements between ESMA and non-EU authorities whose legal and supervisory framework for CCPs are deemed to be equivalent to the European requirements. The MoU provides ESMA with the tools to monitor the ongoing compliance of CCPs with the recognition conditions under EMIR and deals with topics such as requests for information, on-site inspections and confidentiality. The MoU is effective from December 19, 2014.

View the MoU.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted final rules regarding security-based swap data repository ("SDR") registration, duties and core principles in accordance with Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act"), which authorizes the SEC to regulate security-based swaps and to take steps to encourage accountability and transparency in this market. Adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the final rule establishes a registration process for SDRs and requires SDRs to comply with certain duties and core principles regarding maintaining data and when and how a repository’s data could be accessed. It also establishes a requirement for SDRs to have a Chief Compliance Officer and other governance requirements. The SEC’s rules require all swaps to be reported within twenty-four hours until more study is done to refine the timing.

View the press release on the FDIC website.

View the related SEC Open Meeting Agenda.

The European Securities and Markets Authority issued a report on its involvement with the supervisory colleges established under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation for the authorization and supervision of EU-based central counterparties. Supervisory colleges are the channels through which information between home and host authorities is exchanged and through which supervisory activity is coordinated. ESMA is required under EMIR to maintain a coordinating role between national regulators and colleges so as to encourage consistent supervisory practices.

View the report.

Pursuant to a notice published in the Federal Register on January 5, 2015, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission reopened the comment period, and issued a clarification regarding the reopened comment periods, for two position limit rulemakings. On December 9, 2014, the CFTC Agricultural Advisory Committee convened to discuss, among other things, deliverable supply exemptions for hedging positions. To allow commenters enough time to respond to questions raised at the meeting, the CFTC extended the comment periods for an additional 45 days. The CFTC clarified that, in addition to commenting on agenda issues pertaining to agricultural commodities, comments may also include the issues raised at the meeting or in the associated materials posted to the CFTC’s website. The comment period closes January 22, 2015.

View the CFTC press release.