The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities published a report outlining final joint Guidelines for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings in the financial sector. The Joint Committee consists of the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. The final Guidelines follow a consultation on draft guidelines published on July 3, 2015, and will replace previous guidelines published by the ESAs’ predecessors in 2008.

The purpose of the final Guidelines is to provide legal certainty and clarity on assessment processes relating to increases of control and acquisitions of banks, investment firms and insurance firms, bringing a more harmonized, clear and transparent process in prudential assessments by national regulators. In addition, the final Guidelines seek to provide clearer details on what information is required from proposed acquirers. The guidelines cover questions related to: (i) indirect acquisitions of qualifying holdings, persons acting in concert and decisions to acquire; (ii) assessment periods; and (iii) financial soundness of acquirers. The report summarizes the main points and comments that were raised in the twelve responses to its Consultation. 

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published recommendations for harmonizing the EU framework for covered bonds. For banks investing in covered bonds that meet certain criteria, the Capital Requirements Regulation sets preferential risk weights to be applied. The recommendations are set out in a report which builds on the EBA's 2014 Report on EU covered bond frameworks and capital treatment. The aim of the recommendations is to ensure that only financial instruments which comply with certain harmonized structural, credit risk and prudential standards are capable of being covered bonds, and as such have access to the special regulatory and capital treatment provided. Harmonizing the EU framework on covered bonds is part of the Capital Markets Union initiative launched by the European Commission in September 2015

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft Guidelines on supervision of significant branches. The proposed Guidelines set out how the consolidating supervisor, the home supervisor and the host supervisor should cooperate to prudentially supervise and coordinate monitoring of significant branches requiring intensified supervision. An "intensification test" is proposed to assess which branches should be designated as significant-plus branches. Significant-plus branches will be those that are assessed as important for the firm of the group or as performing critical functions or as important for the financial stability of the host Member State. A branch that is assessed to be a significant-plus branch would be subject to intensified supervision which would entail, amongst other things, a separate branch risk assessment, regular on-the-spot checks and inspections, extensive sharing of supervisory intelligence, coordinated application of supervisory and precautionary measures and reflection of the branch in the firm&'s recovery planning. The consultation closes on March 20, 2017.

View the consultation paper.

The US Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule requiring large (generally defined as consolidated assets of $50 billion or more) depository institution holding companies, and certain nonbank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve, to publicly disclose their liquidity coverage ratio. The final rule requires these covered financial institutions to publicly disclose quantitative and qualitative information regarding their liquidity coverage ratio calculation on a quarterly basis. The disclosures must be made in a direct and prominent manner on the company’s public internet site or in a public financial or other public regulatory report and must remain available for five years. The Federal Reserve stated that requiring institutions to report their medium-term liquidity position would provide “a better indication of the overall strengths and weaknesses of a company’s liquidity position” rather than an examination of short-term swings in a company’s liquidity position. The final rule is similar to the rule proposed in November 2015; however, the rule as adopted extends the implementation timeline of the public disclosure requirements by nine months. Under the new rule, covered companies, which include those that have $700 billion or more in total consolidated assets or those that have $10 trillion or more in assets under custody, will need to start complying with the public disclosure requirements beginning on April 1, 2017. Other covered companies will be required to comply with the public disclosure requirements beginning on April 1, 2018.

View text of the final rule.

The US Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the US National Credit Union Administration and the OCC issued FAQs to assist institutions in implementing the new accounting standard for credit losses, which was recently issued by the US Financial Accounting Standards Board. The new standard, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses,” replaces the existing incurred loss methodology in US GAAP and establishes the new current expected credit losses methodology (CECL). The FAQs expand on the “Joint Statement on the New Accounting Standard on Financial Instruments—Credit Losses,” which the agencies issued in June 2016. The agencies plan to continue issuing FAQs regarding the implementation of the CECL methodology.

View notice to the banks.

View FAQs.

The Financial Stability Board published a consultative paper containing draft Guiding Principles on the internal total loss-absorbing capacity or Internal TLAC of global systemically important banks. The FSB is proposing the Guiding Principles to support the implementation of the TLAC Standard. The TLAC Standard is designed to ensure that failing G-SIBs will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity available in resolution. The FSB committed to develop implementation guidance on the TLAC Standard, in particular for internal TLAC. Internal TLAC is the loss-absorbing resources that a resolution entity commits to its material subsidiaries. The proposed Guiding Principles cover, among other things: (i) the process for identifying material sub-groups, the composition of sub-groups, the distribution of internal TLAC between the entities within material sub-groups and the treatment of unregulated or non-bank entities; (ii) the role of home and host authorities and the factors to be considered when determining the size of the internal TLAC requirement; (iii) practical considerations relating to the issuance and composition of internal TLAC; (iv) the trigger mechanism for internal TLAC; and (v) cooperation and coordination between home and host authorities in triggering the write-down and/or conversion into equity of internal TLAC. Responses to the consultation are due by February 10, 2017. The FSB intends to review the technical implementation of the TLAC Standard by the end of 2019.

View the consultative paper.

The European Central Bank published the outcome of its second Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process in 2016 and updated Recommendations on dividend distribution and remuneration policies for 2017. The ECB comments that SREP outcomes reveal a broadly stable capital demand for 2017 and that any changes in individual bank levels reflect changes in individual bank risk profiles. The aggregate capital demand by directly supervised banks for 2017 is comparable to that of 2016, with an average of around 10% Common Equity Tier 1. The ECB also imposed liquidity measures that require banks to have higher liquidity coverage ratios than the regulatory minimum. 

The updated ECB Recommendations on dividend distribution and remuneration policies are to be adopted in 2017, for the financial year 2016. The ECB has maintained its general stance on both topics whilst accounting for regulatory change on the obligation of the supervisor to differentiate between the types of Pillar 2 capital that a bank is required to hold. 

View the press release. 

View the recommendations.

The US Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule establishing total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) long-term debt (LTD), clean holding company requirements and regulatory capital deductions for US global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and the US intermediate holding companies of non-US G-SIBs. While the final TLAC rule is largely consistent with the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed rule issued in October 2015, the Federal Reserve Board made certain adjustments in the final rule in response to comments received. Notably, the Final Rule: (1) lowered certain of the TLAC and LTD requirements; (2) allows certain US intermediate holding companies to issue external LTD rather than require all such LTD to be issued to the foreign parent company or affiliate; (3) allows for the grandfathering of certain long-term debt including debt that was issued prior to December 31, 2016 and contained acceleration clauses or was governed by foreign law; and (4) removed the phase-in periods provided for under the proposed rule. Institutions that meet the relevant thresholds under the final rule would be required to comply with the requirements by January 1, 2019.

View final rule.

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a final rule to remove outdated or unnecessary provisions of certain rules to reduce regulatory burden. The rule is a result of the OCC’s decennial review of its rules required by the US Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act (EGRPRA) of 1996. While the OCC is conducting the EGRPRA review jointly with the other federal financial regulatory agencies, the final rule addresses regulations that are exclusive to the OCC. Of note, the final rule: removes notice and approval requirements for certain changes in permanent capital involving national banks; clarifies national bank director oath requirements; removes certain financial disclosure requirements for national banks;  integrates and updates OCC rules for national banks and federal savings associations relating to municipal securities dealers, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 disclosures, securities offering disclosures and insider and affiliate transactions; updates recordkeeping and confirmation requirements for national banks’ and federal savings associations’ securities transactions; and permits the electronic submission of filings required under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act. The OCC has also recommended legislative chances that would remove unnecessary burden for national banks and federal saving associations.

View final rule.

The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on compliance with the regulatory disclosure requirements in the Capital Requirements Regulation. The EBA's Guidelines aim to ensure harmonized implementation of the Basel III Pillar 3 requirements that were released in January 2015. The Guidelines introduce specific guidance and formats for Pillar 3 disclosures, including tables and templates. The Guidelines will apply to Globally and Other Systemically Important Institutions. However, national regulators are able to require other firms to apply the Guidelines when complying with their Pillar 3 disclosure obligations under CRR. The Guidelines apply for year-end 2017 disclosures. However, the EBA recommends that G-SIIs implement these for year-end 2016 disclosures, and strongly encourages implementation of the guidelines for a limited subset of disclosure requirements relating to risk-weighted assets and capital requirements for the year-end 2016 disclosures.

View the final Guidelines. 

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board and Office of Comptroller of Currency issued interagency final rules that increase the number of small banks and savings associations eligible for an 18-month examination cycle rather than a 12-month cycle. The purpose of the rules is to reduce regulatory compliance costs for smaller institutions, while maintaining safety and soundness protections.

Under the final rules, qualifying well-capitalized and well-managed banks and savings associations with less than $1 billion in total assets are eligible for an 18-month examination cycle. Previously, only firms with less than $500 million in total assets were eligible for extended examination cycle. Qualifying well-capitalized and well-managed US branches and agencies of foreign banks with less than $1 billion in total assets are also eligible.

These rules have been in effect since February 29, 2016, pursuant to interim final rules previously adopted by the agencies. After soliciting comment on interim final rules, the agencies have re-issued them as final rules. Final rules are identical to interim final rules.

View final rules.

The US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a statement of policy regarding how banking entities may seek an extension to conform their investments in certain illiquid hedge funds and private equity funds (covered funds) to the requirements of section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule. As noted below, any such extension requests must be submitted by January 21, 2017.

The Volcker Rule provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act permits the Federal Reserve Board, upon an application by a banking entity, to provide up to an additional five years to conform investments in certain legacy illiquid covered funds where the banking entity had a contractual commitment to invest in the fund as of May 1, 2010. The five-year extension for certain legacy illiquid covered funds is the last conformance period extension that the Federal Reserve Board is authorized to provide banking entities under the statute.

Read more.

A Commission Implementing Regulation on the extension of the transitional periods related to own funds requirements for exposures to central counterparties set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation and European Markets Infrastructure Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The authorization process for existing CCPs established in the European Union is complete but there are still third-country CCPs, notably some based in the US, that are awaiting recognition status. Without an extension of the transitional periods, banks and investment firms in the EU would need to increase their own funds requirements for their exposures to those CCPs that are not yet recognized. The implementing Regulation extends the transitional period by an additional six months to June 15, 2017. 

The recent proposals to amend the CRR published by the European Commission include an amendment to these transitional provisions. The proposed amendment would remove the need for the European Commission to continuously extend the transitional period by basing the transitional deadline instead on the timing of an application for recognition by a third country CCP. 

View the Implementing Regulation.

View more about the proposed amendments to CRR. 

The US Federal Reserve Board invited comment on a proposal to fully apply the Federal Reserve Board’s existing rating system for bank holding companies to savings and loan holding companies.

The Dodd-Frank Act transferred responsibility for the regulation and supervision of savings and loan holding companies to the Federal Reserve Board, effective July 2011. Since then, the Federal Reserve Board has applied its rating system to savings and loan holding companies on an “indicative” basis that describes how the savings and loan holding company would be rated. However, the assignment of an unsatisfactory indicative rating has not automatically triggered supervisory action.

The Federal Reserve Board’s rating system is in part used to determine the safety and soundness of a financial institution, as well as potential supervisory responses. Fully applying the rating system to both bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies will help ensure consistent standards and supervision.

The proposal would fully apply the rating system to most savings and loan holding companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board. However, it would not apply to savings and loan holding companies engaged in significant insurance or commercial activities. These firms would instead continue to receive indicative ratings.

Comments on the proposed rule must be received no later than February 13, 2017.

View proposed rule.
 

The US Federal Reserve announced the approval of technical amendments to its rule regarding risk-based capital surcharges for US-based global systemically important bank holding companies (GSIB surcharge rule), requiring those firms to hold additional amounts of risk-based capital to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The changes would not materially alter the underlying rule approved by the Federal Reserve Board in July 2015.

Read more.

The European Commission published a report on benchmarking of diversity practices under the Capital Requirements Directive. The CRD requires banks and investment firms to ensure that the composition of management bodies is sufficiently diverse in terms of age, gender, geographical provenance, education and professional background. Firms are required to put in place a policy promoting management body diversity and to publish the report, the firm's objectives, relevant targets (if any) and the extent to which these have been met. The Commission is required to report to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on the results achieved as a result of the requirements of CRD and on the appropriateness of benchmarking diversity practices. The Commission found that improvements could still be made, both for having a policy in place and achieving greater diversity and highlighted the need for firms and supervisors to take steps to ensure that the policies are put in place. In addition, the Commission concluded that the benchmarking of diversity practices is a useful tool for assessing the impact and effectiveness of the CRD requirements over time and to monitor for compliance. The Commission does not consider that any legislative amendments are required at this time. 

View the report.

The US Federal Reserve Board published a notice in the Federal Register that it has finalized its proposed revisions to Form FR Y-7Q implementing the home country capital adequacy requirements prescribed in Sections 252.143(b) and 252.154(b) of Regulation YY. These revisions are effective December 31, 2016, except for the three new line items regarding a foreign banking organization’s (FBO) leverage ratio, which are effective March 31, 2018.

The Federal Reserve Board noted that the submission of the information required on Form FR Y-7Q constitutes compliance with both the home country capital adequacy reporting and the certification requirements of Regulation YY. Accordingly, commencing with the FR Y-7Q filings as of December 31, 2016, the Federal Reserve Board will treat each quarterly filing as a certification of the reporting FBO’s home country capital adequacy. The Federal Reserve Board also eliminated the proposed line items for Pillar II buffers and any “other” applicable capital buffer. However, it retained the line item for reporting home country GSIB buffers. Regarding confidentiality, the Federal Reserve Board considers all the required information to be publicly available, but will consider, on a case-by-case basis, requests by individual FBOs for confidential treatment of specific line items.

View the Federal Register notice.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published a Statement of Policy setting out its approach to the implementation of the systemic risk buffer. The SRB is used to prevent and mitigate long term non-cyclical macro-prudential or systemic risks not covered by the Capital Requirements Regulation. It is a firm-specific buffer based on a firm's risk weighted exposures and must be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital. The Statement of Policy is relevant to ring-fenced bodies under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and large building societies that hold more than £25 billion in deposits. These are jointly referred to as "SRB institutions". The UK Independent Commission on Banking recommended that the UK's systemically important SRB institutions be held to a higher capital standard. In addition to these recommendations, the UK legislation implementing the systemic risk buffer requires that the PRA apply the Financial Policy Committee framework as of January 1, 2019. The FPC's framework for the systemic risk buffer was published in May 2016.

Read more.

Federal Reserve Board Governor Tarullo gave a speech defending post-financial crisis efforts to strengthen regulation governing the financial system. Governor Tarullo also criticized recent Republican legislative regulatory reform proposals, including the Financial CHOICE Act’s proposal to raise the leverage ratio of banks to 10% in return for relief from many other prudential requirements, including risk-based capital requirements.

View Governor Tarullo’s remarks.

The US House of Representatives passed a bill (H.R. 6392) that would replace the current supervisory framework under the Dodd-Frank Act that automatically subjects all bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to enhanced prudential standards with a system that would authorize the Financial Stability Oversight Council to designate companies on a case-by-case basis if the FSOC makes a final determination that material financial distress at the bank holding company, or the nature, scope, size, scale, concentration, interconnectedness or mix of its activities could threaten the financial stability of the United States. G-SIBs, however, would be treated as if such a determination had been made. In a statement issued in support of the bill, Representative Warren Davidson (R-OH) stated that the bill “prevent[s] the Fed and Treasury from Blindly implementing new regulations proposed by an international entity, whether coming from the [BCBS] or unelected bureaucrats on the Financial Stability Board.” By contrast, Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) called the legislation the “first step in the Trump agenda to deregulate Wall St.”

View text of HR 6392.

Thomas Curry, Comptroller of the Currency provided remarks at The Clearing House’s Annual Conference, focusing on value of strong capital, the need for liquidity, and importance of effective supervision.

Curry began by highlighting that increased capital requirements, and leverage ratio requirements that supplement these capital standards, have led to large bank holding companies being projected to remain well-capitalized under most severe stress test scenario. He argued against reduction in capital and leverage requirements. He similarly emphasized the importance of strong liquidity requirements that were implemented since the financial crisis and noted that US banks have higher revenues and higher profits than their European counterparts under the new regulations.

Curry discussed the importance of “holistic” supervision, arguing that regulators and banks must continue to improve both metrics and “soft” standards of performance. Curry mentioned a trend in some banks to separate Chairmanship of the Board from the CEO position and noted that the OCC is considering whether it would make sense for all, or all of the largest, federally supervised banks to make the same change. Curry concluded by highlighting the performance of community banks and smaller institutions alongside large institutions and noting the progress made since 2008.

View  Comptroller Curry's remarks.

The Bank of England published its latest Financial Stability report. In the Report, the Financial Policy Committee explains the key risks affecting the UK financial system, how it is addressing these risks and the developments since the Brexit referendum. The Report also includes a summary of the results of the Bank of England's 2016 bank stress test.

The first part of the Report outlines in detail the Committee’s analysis of major risks posed to the stability of the UK economy and the action it is taking in light of such risks. The second part of the Report contains a summary of the Committee’s analysis of those risks and of the resilience of the financial system. The Committee comments that since the Referendum, financial stability in the UK has been maintained despite a challenging period of uncertainty around the domestic and global economic outlook. For example, there have been significant movements in asset prices, including a 12% fall in the sterling exchange rate index. The Committee also comments that the outlook for financial stability in the UK remains challenging as the economy has entered into a period of adjustment. Since July, vulnerabilities that stem from the global economic environment and financial markets have further increased, such as the expected expansionary fiscal policy that could follow the recent US election. The Committee comments that the UK banking system is capitalized to sustain the provision of financial services when faced with severe stresses. Since the global financial crisis, UK banks have built up capital resources with the aggregate common equity Tier 1 capital held by major UK banks now at 13.5% of risk-weighted assets (as at September 2016).  

Read more.

Antonio Weiss, Counselor to the US Treasury Secretary, argued that the FSOC has become a “critical nerve center during episodes of market volatility or stress,” providing a forum to assess system-wide risks, which was missing during the financial crisis. In the speech, Weiss stated that the establishment of FSOC has improved the ability of regulators to share information and collaborate in a way that no single regulator can do on its own.

View text of Weiss’s remarks.
 

The European Banking Authority announced the launch of a second impact assessment on the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9. The second impact assessment builds on the findings in the first impact assessment that was published by the EBA in a report on November 10, 2016. The Report analyzes the estimated impact of implementing IFRS 9 on firms and their regulatory capital and assesses the interaction between IFRS 9 and other prudential requirements. The implementation efforts by firms (such as the development of processes, systems and models) are ongoing and the EBA expects that implementation measures will continue to evolve until at least the initial application of IFRS 9 on January 1, 2018. The EBA highlights that smaller banks are lagging in preparation compared to larger banks and notes that firms should not underestimate the work required to implement IFRS 9.

The second impact assessment will include questions focused on specific aspects around the main topics and findings from the first impact assessment. The EBA expects more detailed and accurate information from banks relating to their implementation of IFRS 9 than the previous assessment, as the information previously given reflected that banks were at an early stage of implementation.

Read more. 

The European Banking Authority published translations of the final Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The substantive content of the Guidelines is unchanged since the final Guidelines were published in August 2016. The publication of the translations triggers the application of the Guidelines which will apply from March 1, 2017.

Examples of relevant transactions include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR places restrictions on providing implicit support to securitizations. These rules apply in addition to the so-called "skin in the game" requirements on originators to retain part of the risk on securitizations. To prevent uncapitalized risks of implicit support, the CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR also states that a transaction is not considered to provide support to a securitization if it is executed under arm’s-length conditions and taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The CRR requires a sponsor or originator institution that has failed to comply with this requirement to, at a minimum, hold own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized.

Read more.

The US Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule, amending Regulation I to implement provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, a five-year bill that reauthorized, at then-current levels, the core programs providing federal transportation funding to the states. The final rule adopts substantively all of the provisions of the interim final rule issued in February of this year. The rule will reduce the dividend rate for banks with total assets of more than $10 billion to the lesser of 6% or the most recent 10-year Treasury auction rate prior to the dividend payment. The rule also adjusts the treatment of accrued dividends when a Federal Reserve Bank issues or cancels capital stock owned by a large member bank.

View text of the rule.

The European Commission published a package of proposed legislative amendments in relation to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive, the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation, the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive. The amendments aim in part to introduce some of the revised global prudential standards from latest FSB/Basel developments, to apply a more proportionate approach to regulating banks and investment firms depending on their size and complexity and to remove some of the options and discretions that are currently available to EU Member States.

The changes to CRR and CRD IV include a new requirement on non-EU G-SIBs (or non-EU banking groups that have EU firms with total assets of at least EUR 30 billion) that have two or more EU firms to establish an EU intermediate holding company.  This controversial proposal does not square well with US or other third country bank structural laws nor will it be reflected in banks' existing resolution and recovery plans, and so will doubtless be a contentious issue as it is developed further.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published a Report and the final draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the Capital Requirements Regulation on the assessment methodology national regulators should use when a firm applies for approval to calculate their own funds requirements using their internal models for one or more risk categories. In particular, the final draft RTS cover: (i) the methodology for national regulators to assess whether a firm complies with the requirements to use an Internal Model Approach for market risk; and (ii) the conditions under which national regulators assess the significance of the positions that will be included in the scope of an IMA. When finalizing the final draft RTS, the EBA took into account, to the extent possible under the existing CRR, the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published in January 2016. The final draft RTS have been submitted to the European Commission for consideration.

View the final draft RTS.

The European Banking Authority published a response to the European Commission’s request for further information on the EBA’s Opinion on the application of the principle of proportionality to remuneration provisions in the Capital Requirements Directive. On December 21, 2015, the EBA published its first Opinion, recommending a possible set of exemptions from some of the remuneration principles, specifically the variable elements of remuneration. The EBA's proposed amendments included: (i) the application of deferral arrangements; (ii) the pay out in instruments for small and non-complex institutions; and (iii) for identified staff that receive only a low amount of variable remuneration when specific criteria are met. The Commission requested further information from the EBA through a letter dated April 21, 2016 on the issue of proportionality. The EBA responded on May 27, 2016, noting the scope of its then-planned analysis and the limitations on such a response given the timing and available data resources.

The EBA found that all but five Member States allow for waivers in the areas of remuneration, that most Member States permit the application of waivers through thresholds based on balance total or by making case-by-case assessments. The EBA concluded that the extent to which banks and identified staff benefit from waivers differs significantly across the EU. 

Read more.

The Financial Stability Board published an updated list of global systemically important banks. The 2016 list of G-SIBs includes the same banks as those in the 2015 list. However, some banks have moved to a higher or lower bucket due to improved data quality, changes in underlying activity and/or the use of supervisory judgement. 

View the 2016 list of G-SIBs.

The US Federal Reserve Board announced that it was broadening the scope of post-employment restrictions applicable to senior examiners and officers of Federal Reserve Banks. The revised rule broadens the one-year bar on accepting paid work from a financial institution from applying to only examiners who are “central points of contacts” (CPCs) to include deputy CPCs, senior supervisory officers (SSOs), deputy SSOs, enterprise risk officers and supervisory team leaders. The new policy also prohibits former Federal Reserve Bank officers from representing third parties before current Federal Reserve employees for one year after leaving their position, and imposes a one-year ban on current employees discussing official business with these former officers.

The restriction on former officers became effective on December 5, 2016, and the restriction on senior examiner employment will become effective on January 2, 2017.

View press release.

The European Banking Authority published a list of public sector entities that may be treated as regional governments, local authorities or central governments when firms are calculating their capital requirements to EU public sector entities for credit risk purposes under the Capital Requirements Regulation. Exposures to the public sector entities that are included in the EBA's list will attract the same risk weight as the respective regional governments, local authorities or central governments. The EBA has compiled the list on its own initiative to enhance harmonization across the EU in this area.

View the EBA's list. 

Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, gave a speech to the Exchequer Club laying out a potential financial regulatory agenda for the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans to pursue. He began by calling for thwarting the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, as well as preventing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from regulating small dollar, “payday” loans.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published for consultation draft amending Implementing Technical Standards to amend the current ITS on supervisory reporting of firms as amended by the ITS on additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting. Under the Capital Requirements Regulation, banks are subject to liquidity reporting requirements. The ITS on supervisory reporting include provisions on a firm's liquidity reporting requirements. Additional monitoring metrics for liquidity were added to the ITS in March 2016. The EBA's final draft ITS on those additional monitoring metrics included a maturity ladder templates and instructions which were removed by the European Commission before it adopted the ITS. The European Commission has since requested the EBA to update the maturity ladder in line with the detailed information of liquid assets as set out in the Delegated Act on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. The EBA's proposed amending ITS are mostly concerned with reintroducing a maturity ladder in line with the reporting requirements provided for in the LCR Delegated Act. The EBA is due to submit the final revised draft ITS in March/April 2017. It is expected that the revised reporting requirements would apply from March 2018. The consultation closes on January 2, 2016. 

View the consultation paper. 

The Government Accountability Office released a report highlighting limitations in the Federal Reserve stress testing programs. The GAO report noted three specific areas that could hinder the effectiveness of stress tests: qualitative assessment disclosure and communication, scenario design and model risk management. Specifically, the GAO faulted the Federal Reserve for not disclosing full information on its qualitative assessment approach, posing challenges to companies that must meet assessment goals and for not analyzing whether the severe scenario used for stress testing adequately reflects a full range of possible outcomes in the event of a crisis. The GAO report makes 15 specific recommendations, which it reported that the Federal Reserve “generally agreed” with and noted specific ongoing and future efforts to implement these recommendations.

View GAO press release.

View the report.

The Board of the FDIC approved a final rule establishing recordkeeping requirements for FDIC-insured institutions with more than two million deposit accounts. Such institutions are required to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor and to implement information technology systems capable of calculating the amount of insured money for depositors within 24 hours of a failure. The final rule also established alternative requirements for certain deposit accounts with “pass through” deposit insurance coverage, including trust and brokered deposits, allowing for institutions to process these accounts during a longer time period after a failure. The rule will become effective on April 1, 2017.

View FDIC press release.

View final rule.

Guidelines laying down principles for the coordination of the assessment and monitoring by the European Central Bank and regulators of institutional protection schemes pursuant to the Capital Requirements Regulation was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Guidelines are applicable to Single Supervisory Mechanism regulators, which includes the ECB and regulators of the participating states. The Guidelines relate to the assessment of IPSs for the purpose of granting prudential permissions and waivers to IPS members pursuant to the CRR and to the monitoring of IPSs that have been recognized for prudential purposes. The Guidelines apply where member institutions simultaneously submit their application for prudential waivers. An IPS is a contractual or statutory liability arrangement that protects its member institutions and ensures that they have the liquidity and solvency needed to avoid bankruptcy where necessary. The CRR requires that regulators must approve and monitor the adequacy of the IPS’s systems for the monitoring and classification of risk and further requires that the IPS conducts its own review. Regulators may allow for certain derogations by an IPS member from certain CRR requirements. The Guidelines outline the process for regulators in making decisions relating to members of the same IPS that consist of both significant and less significant credit institutions. The purpose of the Guidelines is to ensure that regulators apply the same criteria when assessing IPS applications from less significant institutions and consistently monitor ongoing legal requirements. SSM regulators must comply with the Guidelines by December 2, 2016.

View the Guidelines.

The European Central Bank published for consultation draft Guidance on the fit and proper assessment of members of management bodies of significant banks. The ECB is responsible for direct prudential supervision of certain significant banks based in the Eurozone as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The purpose of the draft Guidance is to outline how the ECB will evaluate the qualifications, skills and proper standing of a candidate for becoming a member of a management body. The draft Guidance builds on the current draft guidance under the Capital Requirements Directive and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive published by the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Banking Authority on October 28, 2016. The assessment criteria for the fitness and proprietary of members of the management body are outlined in the draft Guidance. The criteria include experience, reputation, conflicts of interest and independence of mind, time commitment and collective suitability. The draft Guidance provides information on the purpose, scope and type of interviews conducted by the ECB of appointees. The draft Guidance highlights how a decision is taken by the ECB after every fit and proper assessment and the various types of decisions that may be taken. The draft Guidance also notes that under the SSM Regulation, the ECB has the power to remove, at any time, members from the management body of a significant supervised entity who do not fulfill the fit and proper requirements, which is provided for in the SSM Regulation. The ECB is seeking feedback on its draft Guidance by January 20, 2017.

View the draft Guidance.

The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper proposing revisions to the Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting.The ITS on supervisory reporting collate the prudential reporting requirements of banks under the Capital Requirements Regulation, related technical standards and other financial information required by national regulators. The ITS on supervisory reporting are updated when prudential or supervisory requirements change. The EBA is proposing to revise the ITS in relation to supervisory reporting in order to address weaknesses in the existing supervisory reporting requirements concerning sovereign exposures. The EBA has identified areas where additional information or gaps should be filled. In addition, the EBA is proposing to amend the ITS on supervisory reporting in relation to operational risk so that national regulators can more closely monitor losses due to operational risk events and analyze the drivers behind those events that lead to material losses, in particular for larger banks.

The EBA intends to submit the final draft revised ITS to the European Commission in March or April 2017. The revised reporting requirements are expected to apply from March 1, 2018. Responses to the consultation are requested by January 7, 2017.

View the consultation paper.

The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on proposed Guidelines on the application of the Internal Ratings-Based approach, in particular, the estimation of risk parameters for non-defaulted exposures, namely of the probability of default (PD) and the loss given default (LGD), and on the treatment of defaulted assets. The draft Guidelines focus on the definitions and modelling techniques used in the estimation of risk parameters for both non-defaulted and defaulted exposures. The Guidelines aim to address concerns raised over the lack of comparability of capital requirements determined under the IRB approach across firms which the EBA raised in its Opinion and Report on the implementation of the regulatory review of the IRB approach to calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, published in February 2016. 

Responses to the consultation are due by February 10, 2017. The EBA is proposing that the Guidelines would apply from the end of 2020 due to the numerous changes to rating systems that the Guidelines would involve.
 
View the consultation paper. 

View the EBA's Opinion and Report on the implementation of the IRB approach.

The European Securities and Markets Authority issued a public Statement on the implementation of IFRS 9. The purpose of the Statement is to promote consistent application of European securities and markets legislation, and more specifically, International Financial Reporting Standards. ESMA notes that issuers of securities admitted to trading on regulated markets and their auditors should take the public statement into consideration during the implementation of IFRS 9; in particular, when disclosing and auditing its effects on such financial statements. ESMA is of the view that in most cases it would be appropriate to provide disclosures about changes in accounting policies and impacts on an entity’s financial statements in the period of initial application already prior to the entity’s 2017 annual financial reports.  ESMA highlights that IFRS 9 is expected to have significant impacts on firms and, in particular, on credit institutions, due to the new classification for financial assets as well as implementation of the new impairment model based on the ECL. ESMA's Statement provides an illustrative timeline for implementation and a non-exhaustive list of good practices of disclosure when issuers (in general, and not limited to financial institutions) expect the application of IFRS 9 to have a significant impact on their financial statements. ESMA notes that each individual issuer should take into account materiality and its individual circumstances to ensure that relevant and transparent financial information is provided to users of its financial statements. 

View ESMA’s Statement.

The European Banking Authority published a Report outlining observations from its impact assessment on the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9.  The report analyzes the estimated impact of implementing IFRS 9 on firms and assesses the interaction between IFRS 9 and other prudential requirements. The impact assessment was launched in January 2016 on a sample of approximately 50 firms. The implementation efforts by firms (such as the development of processes, systems and models) are ongoing and the EBA expects that implementation measures will continue to evolve until at least the initial application of IFRS 9 from January 1, 2018. The EBA highlights that smaller banks are lagging in preparation compared to larger banks and notes that firms should not underestimate the work required to implement IFRS 9. The EBA is proposing further steps to assist in monitoring the implementation of IFRS 9, including a second exercise on the impact of IFRS 9, ongoing dialogue on the implementation issues outlined in the Report through engagement with the EBA, firms and auditors and considering additional regulatory guidance on the interaction between existing prudential requirements and the applicable accounting framework, including any guidance on transitional arrangements for the application of revised accounting frameworks and clarifications regarding the current regulatory technical standards for specifying specific credit risk adjustments and general credit risk adjustments.

View the Report.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published its final Supervisory Statement on the relationship between a firm's Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) and capital and leverage buffers as well as the relationship between MREL and the PRA's Threshold Conditions which are a set of minimum requirements that authorized firms must meet in order to continue carrying out their regulated activities. The PRA also provided feedback on the responses to its consultation on its proposed approach. The PRA is maintaining its proposed approach without any substantive changes but has amended the Supervisory Statement to provide clarity to firms. The PRA's approach is to prohibit firms from being able to double-count common equity Tier 1 capital towards MREL and to risk-weighted capital and leverage buffers. Some guidance has been given on enforcement: when a firm is in breach of its MREL requirements, the PRA may investigate whether that firm is failing or likely to fail to meet the Threshold Conditions, although investigation will not be automatic. The PRA's Supervisory Statement should be read in conjunction with the Bank of England's policy documents on setting MREL. The PRA will apply the MREL buffer and Threshold Conditions policies in line with the interim and end-state MREL dates set by the BoE. A firm that cannot meet its MREL requirement should notify the PRA promptly.

View the PRA's Policy Statement on buffers and capital requirements for MREL.

View the PRA's Supervisory Statement on buffers and capital requirements for MREL.

The Bank of England published the final rules on implementing the EU Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL). This is the equivalent of the US Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (known as TLAC) rule. Under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and related UK legislation, the BoE is responsible for directing relevant firms to maintain MREL. MREL is a minimum requirement for firms to maintain equity and eligible debt liabilities that can bear losses before and in resolution and results in a top up to standard regulatory capital requirements, similar in concept to the old Tier 3 requirements under Basel II. The requirement will apply to UK authorized banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms, parent undertakings of those firms that are financial holding companies and to UK authorized subsidiaries of such firms.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority published a consultation paper on proposed technical standards on the information to be provided by applicant banks to national regulators in support of their applications for authorization. The Capital Requirements Directive requires a bank to obtain authorization before it begins its operations. Member states set out the requirements for the authorization in their country which means that different standards apply across the EU. At the moment, national regulators stipulate the information required to be submitted in support of a bank's application for authorization and the requirements around the application process. CRD IV requires the EBA to prepare Regulatory Technical Standards setting out the information to be provided in support of an application for bank authorization, requirements applicable to shareholders and qualifying holdings and obstacles which may prevent the effective exercise of supervisory powers by a national regulator. The EBA is also required to prepare Implementing Technical Standards setting out the forms, templates and procedures relating to an authorization application. Once the RTS and ITS enter into force, the requirements will be directly applicable across the EU, largely replacing the existing national regimes on information requirements for authorization applications. However, the proposed RTS do allow some flexibility for national regulators to require additional information from an applicant and provide that information is not required where a national regulator has waived a certain authorization requirement for a particular applicant bank. The EBA is proposing that an application for authorization includes, amongst other things, information on a bank's identification and history, own funds, the proposed activities the bank intends to carry out, shareholders and close links, organizational structure and internal audit policies and infrastructure.

Read more. 

The US OCC announced that it will launch a web-based system for banks to file licensing and public welfare investment applications and notices early next year. The Central Application Tracking System will allow OCC-supervised institutions to draft, submit and track applications and notices online. The system also will allow OCC staff to receive, process and manage those submissions online. The first phase of the system’s rollout will start on January 17, 2017, with the second and third phases set to begin that spring. The new system will replace the current OCC systems, e-Corp and CD-1 Invest. Before the phase 1 rollout, the OCC will provide webinars and resources to explain registration and use of the new system.

View the OCC press release.

The European Banking Authority published a Report on the impact of the adoption into EU legislation of the new international frameworks for counterparty credit risk and market risk. The EBA Report responds to Calls for Advice from the European Commission received in April 2016, as part of the Commission's review of the Capital Requirements Regulation.

As part of its review, the Commission is considering the impact of implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's framework for market risk, known as the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB), published in January 2016 and the new standardized approach for the calculation of the exposure value of derivatives, known as SA-CCR, published in March 2014. The Commission asked the EBA to provide technical advice assessing the impact for EU banks resulting from the adoption of the Basel Committee's framework on market risk and whether any adjustments to that framework would be appropriate. The EBA was also asked for advice on the impact of implementing the SA-CCR, including the proportionate application of SA-CCR to smaller firms.

Read more.

The European Central Bank launched a consultation on proposals to harmonize how Euro member state national regulators of less significant banks exercise the options and discretions available to them under the Capital Requirements Regulation and Capital Requirements Directive. The ECB has already harmonized the application of options and discretions for the banks that it directly prudentially supervises under the Single Supervisory Mechanism. The ECB considers that it is appropriate to develop a harmonized approach of supervision for all banks within the SSM, to ensure the smooth functioning of the whole euro area banking system. To do so, the ECB is intending to adopt a Guideline, which would be legally binding, and a Recommendation, which would not be legally binding. The options and discretions relate to own funds requirements, capital requirements, large exposures, liquidity and transitional provisions. The consultation closes on January 5, 2017.

View the proposed Guideline.

View the proposed Recommendation.

View further information about the ECB's proposals.

The European Banking Authority published a discussion paper on the design for a new framework for applying prudential standards to non-bank investment firms that are not deemed to be systemically important. The EBA published a report in December 2015 in response to a Call for Advice from the European Commission on the suitability of certain aspects of the EU prudential regime for investment firms. In that report, the EBA recommended that it was necessary to distinguish between investment firms for which the requirements in the Capital Requirements Directive and the Capital Requirements Regulation are appropriate and investment firms for which those requirements are inappropriate. It recommended that a separate prudential regime should be established for these investment firms. The Commission issued a second CfA in June 2016, asking for advice on the criteria to identify the investment firms for which the CRD IV requirements are appropriate and which rules should apply to them. The EBA published an Opinion on the criteria aspect of the CfA on October 20, 2016.

Read more.

The European Banking Authority launched a consultation on draft revised Guidelines on internal governance for credit institutions and investment firms. The EU Capital Requirements Directive imposes governance requirements on banks and investment firms which include, amongst other things, requirements to have robust governance arrangements, to establish a risk committee and nomination committee and to have adequate risk management processes and internal controls. CRD requires the EBA to develop Guidelines on internal governance. The proposed new Guidelines set out the internal governance arrangements, processes and mechanisms that firms must implement to ensure effective management of the firm. The Guidelines will apply to a firm's governance arrangements, including their organizational structure and processes to identify, manage, monitor and report risks that they may be exposed to, taking into account the three lines of defense model. The EBA's current Guidelines on internal governance, published on September 27, 2011, will be repealed when the new Guidelines enter into force. Responses to the consultation are due by January 28, 2017.

View the consultation paper and proposed revised Guidelines.

View the current Guidelines.