The US Securities and Exchange Commission published a report of private fund industry statistics and trends. The SEC aggregated and anonymized data private fund advisors have submitted to the SEC on Form ADV and Form PF. The report, which the SEC intends to update periodically, reflects information reported from the first calendar quarter of 2013 through the fourth calendar quarter of 2014. Among other things, the report includes statistics about the distribution of borrowings, an analysis of hedge fund gross notional exposure to net asset value, information regarding beneficial ownership and a comparison of average hedge fund investor and hedge fund portfolio liquidity.

View the report.

The European Commission launched a consultation into the review of the European Venture Capital Funds Regulation and the European Social Entrepreneurships Funds Regulation as part of its Capital Markets Union initiative. The Commission is seeking views on steps that could be taken to improve the take-up of EuVECA and EuSEF funds through amendments to the two Regulations. Proposals include: (i) allowing managers authorized under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive to be able to offer EuVECA and EuSEF funds to clients; (ii) exempting managers of EuVECA and EuSEF funds from authorization under AIFMD once they exceed the EUR500 million threshold; (iii) reducing the minimum subscription threshold for non-professional investors to attract more private investors; (iv) harmonization of registration requirements, including related costs; (v) extending the EuVECA and EuSEF Regulations to third country managers; (vi) extending the range of eligible assets that a EuVECA fund can invest in; and (vii) harmonizing requirements for the marketing of funds and fees for cross-border notifications. The consultation closes on January 6, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a final report on draft Implementing Technical Standards on the procedures and forms for submitting information on penalties and measures under the UCITS V Directive. The draft ITS have been submitted to the European Commission for endorsement. National regulators will be required to provide ESMA with aggregated information on an annual basis of all penalties and measures that they have imposed on individuals and companies for breaches under UCITS V. Measures and penalties disclosed by national regulators to the general public must also be reported to ESMA simultaneously. The draft ITS include the relevant form that is to be submitted to ESMA. Member States must implement UCITS V into national law by March 18, 2016.

View ESMA's final report.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments pursuant to Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to SEC rule 2a-7, related to the removal of credit rating references in the rule. Rule 2a-7 is the principal rule that governs money market funds and the form that money market funds use to report information to the SEC each month about their portfolio holdings.
 
The amendments to rule 2a-7 would eliminate provisions which currently require money market funds to invest only in securities that have received one of the two highest short-term credit ratings or, if they are not rated, securities that are of comparable quality. In addition, under the amended rule, money market funds would also no longer be required to invest at least 97 percent of their assets in securities that have received the highest short-term credit rating. Instead, the amended rule would limit money market funds to investing in a security only if the fund determines that the security presents minimal credit risks after analyzing certain prescribed factors, which factors are discussed in more detail in the adopting release.
 
The SEC adopted additional amendments to rule 2a-7 that would subject additional securities to issuer diversification provisions in the money market fund rule by eliminating a current exclusion for securities subject to a guarantee issued by a non-controlled person.
 
View the SEC press release here. 

View the final rule here. 
 

The Financial Conduct Authority issued a consultation paper on the implementation of the Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities V Directive and other changes to the FCA Handbook that affect investment funds. The consultation deals with three sets of proposals for the regulation of authorized investment funds and seeks views on: (i) the rules and guidance that will give effect to the most recent changes made to the UCITS V Directive; (ii) changes that are to be made to the Handbook to ensure that these work well in conjunction with the European Long Term Investment Funds Regulation, a new kind of fund vehicle which aims to contribute to financing the sustainable growth of the EU’s economy through targeting long term investment, which becomes applicable on December 9, 2015; and (iii) other changes to the Handbook relating to authorized investment funds, including clarification for some of the FCA’s reporting requirements and ambiguities to certain rules, so that the Handbook is kept up to date generally. The FCA is required to transpose the most recent changes to the UCITS V Directive by March 18, 2016. Comments are due by November 9, 2015 for Part I of the consultation, October 5, 2015 for Part II and December 7, 2015 for Part III.

View the consultation.
 

The European Securities and Markets Authority published a consultation paper on draft Regulatory Technical Standards for European Long-Term Investment Fund Regulation. An ELTIF is a new kind of fund vehicle which aims to contribute to financing the sustainable growth of the European Union's economy through targeting long-term investment.  To achieve this aim, ELTIFs are subject to various rules concerning the types of assets in which they can invest. For example, an ELTIF should invest at least 70% of its capital in “eligible investment assets” (which are generally illiquid).  ELTIFs are EU AIFs managed by authorized AIFMs and are therefore additionally subject to the AIFMD rules. The draft RTS aim to determine amongst other things: (i) the characteristics of the facilities made available to retail investors such as those for making subscriptions, payments to unit or shareholders, or repurchasing or redeeming units or shares; (ii) given that an ELTIF may not use financial derivative instruments except where it solely serves the purpose of hedging risks inherent to other investments of an ELTIF, the criteria for establishing the circumstances in which financial derivative instruments solely serve hedging purposes; and (iii) the circumstances in which the life of an ELTIF is considered to be sufficient in length. ELTIFs are expected to increase the volume of non-bank finance for companies investing in the European Union.

View the consultation paper.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its Advice to the European Commission, Parliament and Council on the potential extension of the EU passport to non-EU countries under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive. It also published its Opinion on the functioning of the EU passport under the AIFMD and on the operation of the National Private Placement Regime. Under current rules, non-EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers and EU AIFMs of non-EU Alternative Investment Funds are only able to market their funds into member states when permitted by the relevant NPPR. ESMA has now assessed six non-EU jurisdictions: Guernsey, Hong Kong, Jersey, Singapore, Switzerland and the US. ESMA's Advice states that there are no obstacles for extending the passport to Guernsey and Jersey AIFs and AIFMs. The same applies to Switzerland, pending certain amendments to the Swiss Federal Act on Stock Exchanges and Securities Trading. ESMA states that there is currently a lack of evidence for an appropriate assessment to be made in respect of Hong Kong, Singapore and the US, though it will complete its assessment of these jurisdictions as soon as possible. An assessment of other jurisdictions will also be undertaken. ESMA's Opinion states that some issues have been identified related to the use of the EU passport, including divergent approaches to marketing rules. The Opinion concludes that there is insufficient evidence to show that either the passport or NPPR have raised any major issues in the functioning and implementation of the AIFMD framework. ESMA recommends that a further Opinion on the functioning of the passport and the NPPR is prepared after a longer period of implementation has elapsed in all Member States.

View the Opinion and Advice.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published proposed guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the Undertakings for the Collective Investment of Transferable Securities Directive, known as UCITS V. A minor revision of the guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, known as AIFMD, is also proposed. The proposed UCITS V guidelines are based on the Guidelines on sound remuneration practices developed under AIFMD. ESMA intends to publish a final report and guidelines in Q1 2016 ahead of the implementation deadline for the UCITS V Directive of March 18, 2016. The consultation is open until October 23, 2015.

View the consultation paper.

The UK Government published proposals to amend the Limited Partnership Act 1907 as it applies to funds. The aim of the proposals is to remove unnecessary legal complexity and administrative burdens so as to ensure that the UK limited partnership remains the market standard for European private equity and venture capital funds and other private funds. The proposals include: (i) for private fund vehicles that are limited partnerships to be designated as private fund limited partnerships upon registration; (ii) adding a non-exhaustive list of activities that a limited partner of a private fund limited partnership may carry out without being considered to take part in the management of the business; (iii) removing the requirement for limited partners in private funds to make capital contributions; (iv) allowing the partners in a private fund to agree who should wind up the limited partnership and removing the requirement to obtain a court order; and (v) removing the requirement for certain details to be provided when a private fund is established as a limited partnership. The consultation is open until October 5, 2015.

View the consultation.

View the draft amendment instrument.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions published proposed recommendations and statements of practice on fees and expenses of investment funds. The recommendations and statements of practice are intended to update the 2004 report on International Regulatory Standards on Fees and Expenses which provided a set of international standards of best practice for collective investment schemes and regulators to consider. The proposed recommendations and statements of practice cover issues such as types of permitted fees and expenses, performance-related fees, disclosure of fees and expenses, transaction costs and hard and soft commissions on transactions. The report is aimed at funds whose shares or units may be sold to retail investors and includes open-ended funds, closed-ended funds whose shares are traded in the securities market, unit investment trusts and contractual models. The proposals are open for comment until September 23, 2015. 

View the report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its opinion on the impact of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation on requirements under the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive for OTC derivative transactions that are centrally cleared. ESMA recommends that the provisions on the counterparty risk limits for OTC derivatives in the UCITS Directive should be amended to take into account the clearing obligation of certain OTC derivatives under EMIR. ESMA’s opinion is that the UCITS Directive should not differentiate between OTC derivatives and exchange traded derivatives. The distinction should rather be between cleared and uncleared derivative transactions which would allow a UCITS to treat ETDs and cleared derivatives transactions with similar counterparty risk characteristics in the same way.

View ESMA’s opinion.

The Regulation on European long-term investment funds was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Regulation sets out harmonized rules for the authorization, investment policies and operating conditions of EU alternative investment funds, or parts thereof, that are marketed in the European Union as European long-term investment funds. The Regulation will apply in all EU Member States from December 9, 2015 and Member States are not able to add additional requirements for areas covered by the Regulation.

View the Regulation.

The Council of the EU adopted a regulation that would increase the capital available for long-term investment in the EU economy. The new kind of fund vehicle, the European long-term investment fund, known as an ELTIF, is expected to provide investors with stable long term returns. An ELTIF will be subject to additional rules, requiring it, for example, to invest at least 70% of its capital in clearly defined categories of assets. Only alternative investment funds managed by alternative investment fund managers and authorized under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive would be able to market themselves as ELTIFs. The regulation will come into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

View the text of the regulations.

Commission Delegated Regulations on the information to be provided by national regulators to the European Securities and Markets Authority on the passport for EU alternative investment fund managers managing or marketing EU alternative investment funds in the EU were published on March 27, 2015. Under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, ESMA is required to assess the functioning of the EU passport regime, the operating conditions for AIFs and their managers and the potential impact of an extension of the passport. The Regulations set out the information that national regulators will need to provide to ESMA, including the numbers of EU AIFMs authorized in their jurisdiction, problems relating to coordination between national regulators and cooperation arrangements with non-EU regulators, the effectiveness of the collection and sharing of information for monitoring systemic risk and the national regime for marketing of non-EU AIFs by EU AIFMs.

View the Regulations.

The Volcker Inter-Agency Group posted a new frequently asked question (“FAQ 13”) clarifying the scope of the marketing restriction under the Solely Outside the US (“SOTUS”) covered fund exemption. FAQ 13 adopts the position that the marketing restriction applies only to the activities of a foreign banking entity (including its affiliates) that seeks to rely on the SOTUS covered fund exemption and does not apply to where the foreign banking entity seeks to invest in a covered fund that is sponsored and marketed by a third party. As defined in the FAQ, “third-party covered fund” means a covered fund in which “the foreign banking entity (including its affiliates) does not sponsor, or serve, directly or indirectly, as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor to, the covered fund.” This view is consistent with limiting the extraterritorial application of section 13 to foreign banking entities while seeking to ensure that the risks of covered fund investments by foreign banking entities occur and remain solely outside of the United States.

View the Volcker Rule FAQ

The Financial Conduct Authority published a report on asset management firms and the risk of market abuse. The report sets out the findings from the FCA's thematic review on how asset management firms manage the risk of insider dealing, improper disclosure, market manipulation and market abuse. The report found that firms have procedures in place to control such risks, but that further work is required to cover all material risks as comprehensive procedures were found to be in place only in a minority of firms. Only a small number of firms were found to have appropriate controls on post-trade surveillance, and further steps to manage such risks, and the risks of receiving inside information during the investment process, are recommended.

View the report.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published its technical advice (dated February 3, 2015) to the European Commission on certain aspects of secondary legislation to be adopted under the EU Regulations on European Social Entrepreneurship Funds and European Venture Capital Funds. The advice covers: (i) the types of goods and services, methods of production for goods and services and financial support representing a social objective; (ii) conflicts of interest of European Social Entrepreneurship and European Venture Capital fund managers; (iii) methods for the measurement
of social impact; and (iv) information that European Social Entrepreneurship fund managers should provide to investors. The European Commission will use the technical advice to develop the required secondary legislation.

View ESMA's advice.