A letter from the Chair of the Supervisory Board of the Single Supervisory Mechanism at the European Central Bank, addressed to the management of significant banks, discussing the practices that apply in the new supervisory setting of the SSM was published by the ECB. The ECB assumed its new prudential supervisory role for banks in the Eurozone under the SSM in November 2014. The SSM creates a new system of financial supervision, under which the ECB directly supervises 120 significant banking groups, and sets and monitors supervisory standards for other Eurozone banks by working more closely with national regulators. The letter states that written clarification has been requested by banks on the processes and practices that apply within the new supervisory framework. The Board recognizes that a broad variety of practices relating to the supervision of significant banks exist across member states, and confirms that the existing process under the SSM Regulation will apply until further notice. In the meantime, the ECB will proactively assess the merits of
various other approaches.

View the ECB letter.

The European Banking Authority published draft amended final Regulatory Technical Standards on prudent valuation of fair-valued positions under the Capital Requirements Regulation. The draft RTS, initially published in March 2014, specified the conditions under which prudent valuation requirements should be applied and introduced a methodology to calculate additional valuation adjustments in the form of two approaches: the simplified approach and the core approach. The revised draft RTS contain small amendments replacing all occurrences in Articles 9 and 10 of the word "volatility" to the word "variance." This affects institutions using the core approach only, and relaxes the calibration of the volatility test, giving more flexibility in the implementation of the prudent valuation framework. The EBA suggests that the calibration of the volatility test should be revised within the first two years of implementation.

View the revised RTS.

The UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority published an updated version of its supervisory statement on the approach it will take under the Capital Requirements Regulation on credit risk treatments of exposures to third country counterparties, and for recognized exchanges. Initially, the supervisory statement set out the approach that was to be taken by the PRA on certain credit risk treatments under the CRR, where relevant third country equivalence determinations had not yet been made by the European Commission. It also set out the individual markets and exchanges that qualified as recognized exchanges under the CRR in the absence of a determination by the European Commission. Further to the binding decision of the European Commission that came into effect on January 1, 2015 (which published the names of third countries that apply supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the EU), the section in the supervisory statement dealing with this topic no longer applies and has therefore been deleted.

View the updated supervisory statement.

View the European Commission’s Decision.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its second progress report on the adoption by banks of its Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. The Principles are to be implemented by global systemically important banks by 2016, and aim to strengthen risk data aggregation and risk reporting at banks so that risk management and decision-making practices are improved. The report details the progress that G-SIBs have made and the measures that they have taken to comply with the Principles. Fourteen out of the thirty-one G-SIBs have stated that they will not be able to comply with the principles by the 2016 deadline. The report also states that national regulators are recommended to apply the Principles to domestic systemically important banks (known as D-SIBs) from three years after they have been identified as such.

View the report.

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released a list of Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") performance evaluations that became public during the period of December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. The CRA requires each federal bank regulatory agency to assess each federally insured institution's record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community, consistent with safe and sound lending. The list only includes national banks, federal savings associations and insured federal branches of foreign banks. The possible rating categories are as follows: outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve and substantial noncompliance. Of the thirty evaluations made public, two were rated outstanding and twenty-eight were rated satisfactory.

View list of evaluations.

The FDIC issued a proposed rule amending regulations related to “Fair Credit Reporting.” The three proposed amendments are as follows: (i) rescinding and removing the provisions of FDIC’s Part 334; (ii) rescinding and removing 12 CFR Part 391 Subpart C and amending 12 CFR Part 334 of the FDIC’s existing Rules and Regulations; and (iii) amending the definition of “creditor” in the Red Flag Identity Theft rule to implement the Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010. Overall, the revisions would streamline FDIC rules and eliminate unnecessary regulations.

View the Federal Register notice.

The US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) issued a proposed rule revising certain provisions of the Securitization Safe Harbor rule regarding the treatment of financial assets transferred in the process of a securitization or participation in a FDIC receivership. The rule, if finalized as proposed, would clarify the retention of economic interest in the credit risk of securitized financial assets. The amendment would be effective on the same timeline as the credit risk retention rule adopted under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act.

View the Federal Register notice.

The EU Implementing Regulation which amends the Regulation laying down Implementing Technical Standards on supervisory reporting of institutions regarding asset encumbrance, single data point model and validation rules under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendments include changes on: (i) the format and frequency of reporting on asset encumbrance on an individual and consolidated basis; (ii) first reporting reference dates; and (iii) validation rules. The Implementing Regulation enters into force on February 10, 2015.

View the Implementing Regulation.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its work program for 2015 and 2016. The program is based around four themes: (i) policy development; (ii) the balance between simplicity, comparability and risk sensitivity across the regulatory framework; (iii) monitoring and assessing implementation of the Basel framework; and (iv) improving the effectiveness of supervision. The Basel Committee’s work program states its objectives, which include restoring confidence in capital ratios, continuing to revise existing methods of measuring risk-weighted assets, assessing the role of stress testing, reviewing the regulatory treatment of sovereign risk as well as assessing the interaction of reform policies overall.

View the report.

The Prudential Regulation Authority published a consultation paper on assessing Pillar 2 capital adequacy under the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV. Pillar 2 aims to ensure that firms have sufficient capital to cover potential risks not sufficiently addressed in the prescriptive Pillar 1 requirements. The consultation paper sets out proposed changes to the current framework, rules and supervisory statements, focusing on: (i) new proposed methodologies for determining Pillar 2A capital (which aims to strengthen the relationship between an institution’s risk profile, risk management and risk mitigation systems); (ii) the buffer and the form it would take; (iii) governance and risk management; and (iv) disclosure. The consultation period closes on April 17, 2015. The PRA plans to publish its policy statement and final rules together with a supervisory statement in July 2015. It is expected that the new rules would apply from January 1, 2016.

View the consultation paper.

The following Delegated Regulations supplementing the Capital Requirements Regulation and the Capital Requirements Directive, together known as CRD IV, were published in the Official Journal of the European Union:

1. Delegated Regulation on the liquidity coverage requirement for credit institutions covering matters such as stress scenarios, the composition of the liquidity buffer and the general requirements for liquid assets. This Delegated Regulation will enter into force on February 6, 2015.

2. Delegated Regulation on the leverage ratio covering matters such as the calculation of the leverage ratio and the exposure value of derivatives. This Delegated Regulation entered into force on January 18, 2015.

View Delegated Regulation 1

View Delegated Regulation 2

The European Banking Authority published its second impact assessment report for the liquidity coverage ratio requirements under the Capital Requirements Directive and Capital Requirements Regulation, together known as CRD IV. The report is based on data provided by 322 European banks and concludes that the LCR is not expected to have a material detrimental impact on the business and risk profile of EU-established institutions. This is mainly because EU institutions have significantly improved their compliance with LCR requirements and the potential for making adjustments to balance sheets to meet LCR requirements.

View the report.

HM Treasury published the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 ("the Amending Regulations") together with an explanatory memorandum. The Regulations amend the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014, which implemented all of the capital buffers under the Capital Requirements Directive except for the Systemic Risk Buffer and the Other Sysemically Important Institutions buffer. The Amending Regulations introduce the SRB for banks and investment firms. Capital buffers require firms to hold additional amounts of capital on top of their minimum capital requirements. Under CRD, member states are able to decide which firms should meet the SRB and must notify the European Commission, European Systemic Risk Board, European Banking Authority and national regulators of the reasons for use of the SRB. The SRB would apply to banks and building societies with deposits of more than £25 billion (i.e. it will apply to ring-fenced banks under the bank structural reform requirements), The Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England will be responsible for setting the SRB and the Prudential Regulation Authority will apply the SRB on an entity-by-entity basis. The SRB is applicable from January 1, 2019.

View the Regulations.

View the explanatory memorandum.

The US Department of the Treasury (“US Treasury”), acting for the US Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), issued a proposed rulemaking aimed to implement the Qualified Financial Contract (“QFC”) recordkeeping requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed rules would apply to financial companies with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets, financial companies designated by the FSOC, as well as financial affiliates of these companies and would require recordkeeping of positions, counterparties, legal documentation and collateral. This information is needed to help the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver to, among other things, decide whether to transfer QFCs, evaluate the consequences of decisions to transfer, disaffirm or permit the termination of QFCs with one or more counterparties, and conclude whether any financial systematic risks are posed by the transfer, disaffirmation or termination of such QFCs in the case of a distressed situation. The deadline for comments is April 7, 2015.

View the US Treasure press release.

View the Federal Register notice of proposed rulemaking.